1
|
Malshy K, Marthi S, Ortiz R, Nicaise E, Golijanin B, Miller K, Hartsell L, Cancian M. Comparing the lifespan of virgin artificial urinary sphincters in radiated patients: transcorporal vs. standard placement. World J Urol 2024; 42:391. [PMID: 38985294 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05085-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the lifespan of first transcorporal cuff (TC) placement of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) versus standard placement (SP) in patients with prior radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS We reviewed first (virgin) AUS placements from two high-volume care centers between 1/2011 and 1/2021, including PCa patients with RT history. AUS lifespan was assessed via the hazard ratio of device explantation and/or revision within a ten-year timeframe for the TC vs. SP approaches. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t-tests compared clinicodemographic variables. Kaplan-Meier curve compared TC and SP lifespan. RESULTS 85/314 men with AUS met inclusion criteria, with 38.8% (33/85) in the TC group and 61.2% (52/85) in the SP group. Median ages were 69.8 (IQR = 65.2-73.6) and 67.1 (61.6-72.9), respectively, p = 0.17. Over a median follow up of 51.9 (15.8-86.1) and 80.4 (28.1-128.3) months for the TC and SP, overall, 12 (36.4%) TC devices were removed (four [12.1%] due to mechanical failures; eight [24.2%] erosions, and two [6.1%] infections) vs. 29 (55.8%) in the SP group (14 [26.9%] mechanical failures; 11 [21.1%] erosions, and five [9.6%] infections). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two approaches, with HR = 0.717, 95% CI 0.37-1.44, p = 0.35. The calculated device survival probabilities for the TC vs. SP at one, five, and 10 years were 78.8% vs. 76.9%, 69.3% vs. 58.7%, and 62.1% vs. 46.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS TC cuff insertion for the first AUS implantation in pre-radiated patients showed to be comparable to SP when it comes to device survival, with comparable complication rates. Current guidance for approach selection is primarily based on patient selection and surgeon preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamil Malshy
- The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, The Miriam Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 86, 8th street, Providence, RI, 02906, US.
| | - Siddharth Marthi
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Rebecca Ortiz
- The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, The Miriam Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 86, 8th street, Providence, RI, 02906, US
| | - Edouard Nicaise
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Borivoj Golijanin
- The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, The Miriam Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 86, 8th street, Providence, RI, 02906, US
| | - Kennon Miller
- The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, The Miriam Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 86, 8th street, Providence, RI, 02906, US
| | - Lindsey Hartsell
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Madeline Cancian
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thakker PU, Sandberg M, Hemal AK, Rodriguez AR. A Comprehensive Review of the Current State of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Salvage Prostatectomy. Int Braz J Urol 2024; 50:398-414. [PMID: 38701186 PMCID: PMC11262726 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2024.0126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Salvage robot assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP) is performed for patients with biochemical or biopsy proven, localized prostate cancer recurrences after radiation or ablative therapies. Traditionally, sRARP has been avoided by lower volume surgeons due to technical demand and high complication rates. Post-radiation sRARP outcomes studies exist but remain few in number. With increasing use of whole gland and focal ablative therapies, updates on sRARP in this setting are needed. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of recently reviewed studies on the oncologic outcomes, functional outcomes, and complications after post-radiation and post-ablative sRARP. Tips and tricks are provided to guide surgeons who may perform sRARP. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a non-systematic literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE for the most relevant articles pertaining to the outlined topics from 2010-2022 without limitation on study design. Only case reports, editorial comments, letters, and manuscripts in non-English languages were excluded. Key Content and Findings: Salvage robotic radical prostatectomy is performed in cases of biochemical recurrence after radiation or ablative therapies. Oncologic outcomes after sRARP are worse compared to primary surgery (pRARP) though improvements have been made with the robotic approach when compared to open salvage prostatectomy. Higher pre-sRARP PSA levels and more advanced pathologic stage portend worse oncologic outcomes. Patients meeting low-risk, EAU-biochemical recurrence criteria have improved oncologic outcomes compared to those with high-risk BCR. While complication rates in sRARP are higher compared to pRARP, Retzius sparing approaches may reduce complication rates, particularly rectal injuries. In comparison to the traditional open approach, sRARP is associated with a lower rate of bladder neck contracture. In terms of functional outcomes, potency rates after sRARP are poor and continence rates are low, though Retzius sparing approaches demonstrate acceptable recovery of urinary continence by 1 year, post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS Advances in the robotic platform and improvement in robotic experience have resulted in acceptable complication rates after sRARP. However, oncologic and functional outcomes after sRARP in both the post-radiation and post-ablation settings are worse compared to pRARP. Thus, when engaging in shared decision making with patients regarding the initial management of localized prostate cancer, patients should be educated regarding oncologic and functional outcomes and complications in the case of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer that may require sRARP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parth U Thakker
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Maxwell Sandberg
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Ashok K Hemal
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Alejandro R Rodriguez
- Department of Urology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Feng T, Liang Z, Xiao Y, Pan B, Zhou Y, Ma C, Zhou Z, Yan W, Zhu M. Can a nomogram predict apical prostate cancer pathology upgrade from fusion biopsy to final pathology? A multicenter study. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7341. [PMID: 38845479 PMCID: PMC11157165 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluates the efficacy of a nomogram for predicting the pathology upgrade of apical prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS A total of 754 eligible patients were diagnosed with apical PCa through combined systematic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy followed by radical prostatectomy (RP) were retrospectively identified from two hospitals (training: 754, internal validation: 182, internal-external validation: 148). A nomogram for the identification of apical tumors in high-risk pathology upgrades through comparing the results of biopsy and RP was established incorporating statistically significant risk factors based on univariable and multivariable logistic regression. The nomogram's performance was assessed via the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS Univariable and multivariable analysis identified age, targeted biopsy, number of targeted cores, TNM stage, and the prostate imaging-reporting and data system score as significant predictors of apical tumor pathological progression. Our nomogram, based on these variables, demonstrated ROC curves for pathology upgrade with values of 0.883 (95% CI, 0.847-0.929), 0.865 (95% CI, 0.790-0.945), and 0.840 (95% CI, 0.742-0.904) for the training, internal validation and internal-external validation cohorts respectively. Calibration curves showed good consistency between the predicted and actual outcomes. The validation groups also showed great generalizability with the calibration curves. DCA results also demonstrated excellent performance for our nomogram with positive benefit across a threshold probability range of 0-0.9 for the training and internal validation group, and 0-0.6 for the internal-external validation group. CONCLUSION The nomogram, integrating clinical, radiological, and pathological data, effectively predicts the risk of pathology upgrade in apical PCa tumors. It holds significant potential to guide clinicians in optimizing the surgical management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianrui Feng
- Department of UrologyPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
| | - Zhen Liang
- Department of UrologyPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
| | - Yu Xiao
- Department of PathologyPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
| | - Boju Pan
- Department of PathologyPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
| | - Yi Zhou
- Department of UrologyPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
| | - Chengquan Ma
- Department of UrologyTianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjinChina
| | - Zhien Zhou
- Department of UrologyPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
| | - Weigang Yan
- Department of UrologyPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
| | - Ming Zhu
- Department of UrologyPeking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Takano S, Tomita N, Takaoka T, Niwa M, Torii A, Kita N, Okazaki D, Uchiyama K, Nakanishi-Imai M, Ayakawa S, Iida M, Tsuzuki Y, Otsuka S, Manabe Y, Nomura K, Ogawa Y, Miyakawa A, Miyamoto A, Takemoto S, Yasui T, Hiwatashi A. Late genitourinary toxicity in salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: impact of daily fraction doses. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1050-1056. [PMID: 38466928 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of daily fraction doses on late genitourinary (GU) toxicity after salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for prostate cancer. METHODS This multi-institutional retrospective study included 212 patients who underwent SRT between 2008 and 2018. All patients received image-guided intensity-modulated SRT at a median dose of 67.2 Gy in 1.8-2.3 Gy/fraction. The cumulative rates of late grade ≥2 GU and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were compared using Gray test, stratified by the ≤2.0 Gy/fraction (n = 137) and ≥2.1 Gy/fraction groups (n = 75), followed by multivariate analyses. The total dose was represented as an equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) with α/β = 3 Gy. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 63 months, the cumulative rates of 5-year late grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicities were 14% and 2.5%, respectively. The cumulative rates of 5-year late grade ≥2 GU toxicity in the ≥2.1 Gy/fraction and ≤2.0 Gy/fraction groups were 22% and 10%, respectively (P = .020). In the multivariate analysis, ≥2.1 Gy/fraction was still associated with an increased risk of late grade ≥2 GU toxicity (hazard ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-4.99; P = .023), while the total dose was not significant. CONCLUSION The present results showed that ≥2.1 Gy/fraction resulted in a higher incidence of late grade ≥2 GU toxicity in SRT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The impact of fraction doses on late GU toxicity after SRT remains unknown. The results suggest that higher fraction doses may increase the risk of late GU toxicity in SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiya Takano
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Natsuo Tomita
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Taiki Takaoka
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Masanari Niwa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Akira Torii
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Nozomi Kita
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Dai Okazaki
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Kaoru Uchiyama
- Department of Radiology, Kariya Toyota General Hospital, Kariya, Aichi 448-8505, Japan
| | - Mikiko Nakanishi-Imai
- Department of Radiology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8650, Japan
| | - Shiho Ayakawa
- Department of Radiology, Japan Community Health care Organization Chukyo Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi 457-8510, Japan
| | - Masato Iida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Suzuka General Hospital, Suzuka, Mie 513-0818, Japan
| | - Yusuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan
| | - Shinya Otsuka
- Department of Radiology, Okazaki City Hospital, Okazaki, Aichi 444-8553, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Manabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanbu Tokushukai General Hospital, Shimajiri, Okinawa 901-0493, Japan
| | - Kento Nomura
- Department of Radiotherapy, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 462-8508, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kasugai Municipal Hospital, Kasugai, Aichi 486-8510, Japan
| | - Akifumi Miyakawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi 460-0001, Japan
| | - Akihiko Miyamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokuto Hospital, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-0833, Japan
| | - Shinya Takemoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujieda Heisei Memorial Hospital, Fujieda, Shizuoka 426-8662, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yasui
- Department of Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| | - Akio Hiwatashi
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meijer D, van Leeuwen PJ, Eppinga WS, Vanneste BG, Meijnen P, Daniels LA, van den Bergh RC, Lont AP, Bodar YJ, Ettema RH, de Bie KC, Oudshoorn FH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, van der Poel HG, Donswijk ML, Heymans MW, Oprea-Lager DE, Schaake EE, Vis AN. Development and Internal Validation of a Novel Nomogram Predicting the Outcome of Salvage Radiation Therapy for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients without Metastases on Restaging Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 61:37-43. [PMID: 38384437 PMCID: PMC10879939 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Owing to the greater use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), patient selection for local salvage radiation therapy (sRT) has changed. Our objective was to determine the short-term efficacy of sRT in patients with BCR after RARP, and to develop a novel nomogram predicting BCR-free survival after sRT in a nationwide contemporary cohort of patients who underwent PSMA PET/CT before sRT for BCR of PCa, without evidence of metastatic disease. Methods All 302 eligible patients undergoing PCa sRT in four reference centers between September 2015 and August 2020 were included. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis using a backward elimination procedure to develop a nomogram for predicting biochemical progression of PCa, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥0.2 ng/ml above the post-sRT nadir within 1 yr after sRT. Key findings and limitations Biochemical progression of disease within 1 yr after sRT was observed for 56/302 (19%) of the study patients. The final predictive model included PSA at sRT initiation, pathological grade group, surgical margin status, PSA doubling time, presence of local recurrence on PSMA PET/CT, and the presence of biochemical persistence (first PSA result ≥0.1 ng/ml) after RARP. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for this model was 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.64-0.79). Using our nomogram, patients with a predicted risk of >20% had a 30.8% chance of developing biochemical progression within 1 yr after sRT. Conclusions Our novel nomogram may facilitate better patient counseling regarding early oncological outcome after sRT. Patients with high risk of biochemical progression may be candidates for more extensive treatment. Patient summary We developed a new tool for predicting cancer control outcomes of radiotherapy for patients with recurrence of prostate cancer after surgical removal of their prostate. This tool may help in better counseling of these patients with recurrent cancer regarding their early expected outcome after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennie Meijer
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wietse S.C. Eppinga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ben G.L. Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philip Meijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laurien A. Daniels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne P. Lont
- Department of Urology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Yves J.L. Bodar
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rosemarijn H. Ettema
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katelijne C.C. de Bie
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jakko A. Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G. van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L. Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn W. Heymans
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva E. Schaake
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N. Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Giesen A, Van den Broeck T, Develtere D, Raskin Y, Wymer K, Eden C, Claessens M, Hente R, Rans K, Berghen C, De Meerleer G, Langley S, Karnes RJ, Heidenreich A, Pfister D, Joniau S. Salvage vesiculectomy for local prostate cancer recurrence: surgical technique and early post-operative outcomes. World J Urol 2024; 42:81. [PMID: 38358521 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04771-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Isolated recurrence in remnants of the seminal vesicles (SV) after treatment of primary prostate cancer (PCa) has become a more frequent entity with the widespread use of more sensitive next-generation imaging modalities. Salvage vesiculectomy is hypothesized to be a worthwhile management option in these patients. The primary goal of this study is to describe the surgical technique of this new treatment option. Secondary outcomes are peri- and post-operative complications and early oncological outcomes. METHODS Retrospective multicenter study, including 108 patients with solitary recurrence in the SV treated between January 2009 and June 2022, was performed. Patients with local recurrences outside the SVs or with metastatic disease were excluded. Both SVs were resected using a robot-assisted or an open approach. In selected cases, a concomitant lymphadenectomy was performed. RESULTS Overall, 31 patients (29%) reported complications, all but one grade 1 to 3 on the Clavien-Dindo Scale. A median PSA decrease of 2.07 ng/ml (IQR: 0.80-4.33, p < 0.001), translating into a median PSA reduction of 92% (IQR: 59-98%) was observed. At a median follow-up of 14 months, freedom from secondary treatment was 54%. Lymphadenectomy had a significant influence on PSA reduction (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION Salvage vesiculectomy for PCa recurrence limited to the SV is a safe procedure with excellent PSA response and is a potential curative treatment in a subset of patients. A concomitant lymphadenectomy can best be performed in all patients that did not underwent one at primary treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Giesen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Van den Broeck
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dries Develtere
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yannic Raskin
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Urology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - Kevin Wymer
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Christopher Eden
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | | | - Robert Hente
- Department of Urology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium
| | - Kato Rans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlien Berghen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stephen Langley
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | | | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Department of Urology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tremeau L, Mottet N. Management of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Curative Treatment: A Focus on Older Patients. Drugs Aging 2022; 39:685-694. [PMID: 36008748 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-022-00973-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Following a treatment with curative intent, a biochemical recurrence may be diagnosed, often many years after the primary treatment. The consequences of this relapse on survival are very heterogeneous. The expected specific survival at relapse is above 50% at 10 years. Therefore, its management needs to be balanced with the individual life expectancy. The relapse needs to be categorized as either a low- or high-risk category. The latter has to be considered for salvage therapy, provided the individual life expectancy is long enough. It is evaluated through an initial geriatric assessment, starting with the G8 score as well as the mini-Cog. A comprehensive geriatric assessment might be needed based on the G8 score. Patients will then be categorized as either fit, vulnerable, or frail. If a local salvage therapy is considered, the relapse localization might be of interest in some situations. Available salvage therapies in senior adults have nothing special compared to salvage of younger men, except for aggressive local therapy, which might be less well tolerated. The key objective in managing a biochemical recurrence in senior adults is to find the right balance between under- and over-treatment in a shared decision process. In many frail and vulnerable men, a clinically oriented watchful waiting should be preferred, while fit men with an aggressive relapse and a significant life expectancy need an active therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lancelot Tremeau
- Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France.
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shimoyachi N, Yoshioka Y, Sasamura K, Yonese J, Yamamoto S, Yuasa T, Soyano T, Kozuka T, Oguchi M. Comparison Between Dose-Escalated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy for Salvage Radiation Therapy After Prostatectomy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100753. [PMID: 34934854 PMCID: PMC8655408 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare long-term outcomes and late toxicity between patients treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and with dose-escalated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) as salvage radiation therapy (SRT) after prostatectomy. Methods and Materials A total of 110 patients who had been treated at our institution between 2010 and 2018 with SRT for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy were included. The patients were treated either by 3D-CRT with 64 Gy (59 patients) or by IMRT with 70 Gy (51 patients). The irradiation target was the prostate bed only (106 patients) or the prostate bed and pelvic region (4 patients). Twelve patients (11%) received concurrent androgen deprivation therapy. The differences in clinical outcomes and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity between the 3D-CRT and IMRT groups were retrospectively assessed. Toxicities were recorded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression after SRT was defined as an increase in the serum PSA level of 0.2 ng/mL from the PSA nadir after SRT and confirmed by a second PSA measurement that was higher than the first. Results The median follow-up time was 7.8 years for 3D-CRT (range:,0.3-9.2 years) and 3.1 years for IMRT (range, 0.4-7.2 years). There was no significant difference in the 4-year biochemical no-evidence-of-disease (bNED) rate between the 3D-CRT and IMRT groups (43.5% vs 52.1%; P = .20). Toxicity analysis showed no significant difference in late GI or GU toxicities of grade 2 or greater between the 3D-CRT and IMRT groups. The respective 4-year cumulative rates of toxicity in the 3D-CRT and IMRT groups were as follows: grade ≥2 GI toxicity, 8.8% and 4.4% (P = .42); grade ≥2 GU toxicity, 19.1% and 20.3% (P = .93); and grade ≥2 hematuria, 5.3% and 8.0% (P = .67). In the 3D-CRT group, the 8-year cumulative rates of GI toxicity, GU toxicity, and hematuria of grade 2 or greater were 8.8%, 28.4%, and 12.6%, respectively. Conclusions Dose-escalated IMRT showed no improvements in bNED or late toxicity compared with 3D-CRT. In addition, the results suggest that GU toxicity can occur after a long period (even after 6 years), whereas GI toxicity is seldom newly observed after 4 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nana Shimoyachi
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and
- Corresponding author: Nana Shimoyachi, MD
| | | | | | - Junji Yonese
- Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinya Yamamoto
- Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Yuasa
- Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Soyano
- Department of Radiology, Japan Self-Defense Forces Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takuyo Kozuka
- Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cao JZ, Su R, Pan JF, Yan ZJ, Ma Q. The Use of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Plus 150mg Bicalutamide as First Line Salvage Therapy for Local Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:705025. [PMID: 34868911 PMCID: PMC8636315 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.705025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) are often treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). However, more than 30% of such patients have high risk of recurrence. Salvage radiotherapy (SRT), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and combination of radiotherapy and ADT are the standard care for recurrent PCa. Recently, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has gradually applied in the treatment of recurrent PCa. Here, we proposed a hypothesis that combined HIFU and bicalutamide 150mg as first line salvage therapy to treat patients with local recurrent PCa with visible lesions due to the following advantages: (1) HIFU is effective in reducing local tumor load, and bicalutamide 150mg is a feasible and safety option to combine with HIFU. (2) Compared with radiotherapy, HIFU plus 150mg bicalutamide is minimal invasiveness with fewer adverse effects and better quality of life(QOL); (3) Radiotherapy can be preserved as the second-line salvage method in the cases who are failure to HIFU and 150mg bicalutamide combination. More clinical trials are warranted to confirm this hypothesis in treatment with recurrent PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-zhou Cao
- Medical School, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
- Comprehensive Urogenital Cancer Center, Ningbo First Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
| | - Rui Su
- Comprehensive Urogenital Cancer Center, Ningbo First Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
- Department of Urology, Ningbo First Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
- Ningbo Clinical Research Center for Urological Disease , Ningbo, China
| | - Jin-feng Pan
- Medical School, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
- Comprehensive Urogenital Cancer Center, Ningbo First Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
| | - Ze-jun Yan
- Department of Urology, Ningbo First Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
- Ningbo Clinical Research Center for Urological Disease , Ningbo, China
| | - Qi Ma
- Comprehensive Urogenital Cancer Center, Ningbo First Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
- Department of Urology, Ningbo First Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
- Ningbo Clinical Research Center for Urological Disease , Ningbo, China
- Translational Research Laboratory for Urology, The Key Laboratory of Ningbo City, Ningbo First Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Moris L, Gandaglia G, Vilaseca A, Van den Broeck T, Briers E, De Santis M, Gillessen S, Grivas N, O'Hanlon S, Henry A, Lam TB, Lardas M, Mason M, Oprea-Lager D, Ploussard G, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, van der Poel H, Wiegel T, Willemse PP, Yuan CY, Grummet JP, Tilki D, van den Bergh RCN, Cornford P, Mottet N. Evaluation of Oncological Outcomes and Data Quality in Studies Assessing Nerve-sparing Versus Non-Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy in Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:690-700. [PMID: 34147405 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Surgical techniques aimed at preserving the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy (RP) have been proposed to improve functional outcomes. However, it remains unclear if nerve-sparing (NS) surgery adversely affects oncological metrics. OBJECTIVE To explore the oncological safety of NS versus non-NS (NNS) surgery and to identify factors affecting the oncological outcomes of NS surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Relevant databases were searched for English language articles published between January 1, 1990 and May 8, 2020. Comparative studies for patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer (PCa) treated with primary RP were included. NS and NNS techniques were compared. The main outcomes were side-specific positive surgical margins (ssPSM) and biochemical recurrence (BCR). Risk of bias (RoB) and confounding assessments were performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Out of 1573 articles identified, 18 studies recruiting a total of 21 654 patients were included. The overall RoB and confounding were high across all domains. The most common selection criteria for NS RP identified were characteristic of low-risk disease, including low core-biopsy involvement. Seven studies evaluated the link with ssPSM and showed an increase in ssPSM after adjustment for side-specific confounders, with the relative risk for NS RP ranging from 1.50 to 1.53. Thirteen papers assessing BCR showed no difference in outcomes with at least 12 mo of follow-up. Lack of data prevented any subgroup analysis for potentially important variables. The definitions of NS were heterogeneous and poorly described in most studies. CONCLUSIONS Current data revealed an association between NS surgery and an increase in the risk of ssPSM. This did not translate into a negative impact on BCR, although follow-up was short and many men harbored low-risk PCa. There are significant knowledge gaps in terms of how various patient, disease, and surgical factors affect outcomes. Adequately powered and well-designed prospective trials and cohort studies accounting for these issues with long-term follow-up are recommended. PATIENT SUMMARY Neurovascular bundles (NVBs) are structures containing nerves and blood vessels. The NVBs close to the prostate are responsible for erections. We reviewed the literature to determine if a technique to preserve the NVBs during removal of the prostate causes worse cancer outcomes. We found that NVB preservation was poorly defined but, if applied, was associated with a higher risk of cancer at the margins of the tissue removed, even in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. The long-term importance of this finding for patients is unclear. More data are needed to provide recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Moris
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Antoni Vilaseca
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Nikos Grivas
- Department of Urology, Hatzikosta General Hospital, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Shane O'Hanlon
- Medicine for Older People, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ann Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Thomas B Lam
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Malcolm Mason
- Division of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine Cardiff University, UK
| | - Daniela Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Olivier Rouviere
- Department of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul Willemse
- Department of Oncological Urology, Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cathy Y Yuan
- Department of Medicine, Health Science Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jeremy P Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center and Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Philip Cornford
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pak S, Lee DE, You D, Jeong IG, Joung JY, Lee KH, Hong JH, Kim CS, Ahn H. Validation of the European association of urology biochemical recurrence risk groups after radical prostatectomy in an Asian cohort and suggestions for refinement. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:298.e1-298.e6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
12
|
Wang S, Du P, Cao Y, Yang X, Yang Y. Tumor Biological Feature and Its Association with Positive Surgical Margins and Apical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy in Non-Metastasis Prostate Cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:1528-1536. [PMID: 33924669 PMCID: PMC8167593 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28020144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: We assessed clinical and tumor biological features and evaluated their association with positive surgical margins (PSMs) and positive apical margins (PAMs) variability after radical prostatectomy (RP) in men with non-metastasis prostate cancer (nmPCa) in our institute. Patients and methods: During the period from January 2013 to December 2017, clinical and pathological data were collected in 200 patients with nmPCa undergoing RP in the Urological department of Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute. Surgical and apical margins were stated negative and positive, separately. A dichotomous logistic regression model was used to assess clinical and tumor biological features including age, total prostate volume (TPV), biopsy positive cores (BPC), D’Amico risk grade, tumor clinical stage, International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) grade, tPSA, f/t and pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) invasion, and their association with PSMs and PAMs was evaluated. Results: Overall, men with nmPCa in this study had a high ISUP grade (58.5% grade 3–5), high risk grade (89.4%) and high clinical T stage (56% cT3-4). PSMs were detected in 106 patients; the rate of PSMs was 53%. Among patients with PSMs, 83% were PAMs; the overall rate of PAMs was 44%. Among patients with PSMs, high risk (OR, 1.439; p = 0.023), cT3a (OR, 1.737; p = 0.045), cT3b (OR, 5.286; p < 0.001), cT4 (OR, 6.12; p < 0.001), ISUP Grade 4 (OR, 2; p = 0.034) and Grade 5 (OR, 6.167; p < 0.001) and PLN invasion (OR, 6; p = 0.019) were strongly associated with PSMs using a dichotomous logistic regression univariable model, and high risk (OR, 6; p = 0.019), cT3a (OR, 5.116; p = 0.048), cT3b (OR, 9.194; p = 0.008), cT4 (OR, 4.58; p = 0.01), ISUP Grade 4 (OR, 7.04; p = 0.035), Grade 5 (OR, 16.514; p = 0.002) and PLN invasion (OR, 5.516; p = 0.03) were independently associated with PSMs by using multivariable analysis. Among patients with PAMs, cT3b (OR, 2.667; p = 0.004), cT4 (OR, 3; p = 0.034) and proportion of BPC (OR, 4.594; p = 0.027) were strongly associated with PAMs by using a dichotomous logistic regression univariable model, and cT3b (OR, 3.899; p = 0.02), cT4 (OR, 2.8; p = 0.041) and proportion of BPC (OR, 5.247; p = 0.04) were independently associated with PSMs by using multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Patients with nmPCa in our institute had high risk, high ISUP grade and high clinical stage. Tumor biological factors were strongly associated with PSMs and PAMs, and PLN invasion was independently associated with PSMs. The risk factors influenced the status of surgical margins, and apical margins were different.
Collapse
|
13
|
Rans K, Berghen C, Joniau S, De Meerleer G. Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:156-162. [PMID: 32035581 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Revised: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
For patients experiencing biochemical recurrence in the absence of distant metastasis, salvage radiotherapy (SRT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is currently the only possible curative treatment option. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) monitoring and the selected use of SRT has some advantages when compared with adjuvant radiotherapy. The most important one is avoidance of a potential overtreatment of patients who would never have disease progression, even in the presence of high-risk pathological features. The identification of a specific PSA cut-off seems to be incorrect. In patients with more adverse pathological features, early SRT administered at the very first sign of a PSA rise granted better disease control. Dose-intensified SRT is feasible and well tolerated with no significant difference in grade 2 or more acute and late toxicity. At least 66 Gy must be given in the salvage setting. ADT has a radio-sensitising effect on the radiotherapy by inhibiting the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. The use of ADT in the salvage setting results in a better oncological outcome. Hormonal therapy is associated with a decrease in quality of life and side-effects depending on the duration of hormone therapy. The oncological benefit of hormone therapy duration depends on their clinical and pathological characteristics. 68-Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography is the gold standard in staging prostate cancer patients with biochemical persistence or recurrence after radical prostatectomy. The implementation of 18F-labelled PSMA tracers can provide a further improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Rans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - C Berghen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Leufgens F, Berneking V, Vögeli TA, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Eble MJ, Pinkawa M. Quality of Life Changes >10 Years After Postoperative Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:382-388. [PMID: 31201895 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Revised: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze long-term quality-of-life (QoL) changes related to postoperative radiation therapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients who received postoperative 3-dimensional conformal RT in the years 2003 to 2008 with 1.8 to 2.0 Gy fractions up to 66.0 to 66.6 Gy (n = 181) were surveyed using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire before the beginning of RT (A); on the last day (B); and 2 months (C), 1 to 3 years (D), 6 to 9 years (E), and 10 to 13 years (F) after RT. RESULTS Mean urinary bother, urinary incontinence bother, and bowel bother score changes (in relation to baseline at time A) of 13, 14, and 7 and 14, 15, and 7 were found at times E and F, respectively (P < .01 for all comparisons). Sexual function scores decreased 6 and 8 points on average (P < .01). Patient age at the time of RT had a considerable impact on urinary bother and urinary incontinence bother, with increasing differences over time when comparing patients aged <68 versus ≥68 years: 0 versus 7 and 0 versus 7 points at time D and 8 versus 23 and 6 versus 35 points at time F, respectively. Patients who did not respond to RT with a decreasing prostate-specific antigen level had greater urinary and urinary incontinence bother and bowel bother score changes >10 years after treatment (25 vs 12; P = .04, 36 vs 10; P = .03, and 20 vs 5; P = .07, respectively). A higher rectal dose was associated with greater acute and long-term bowel bother score decrease. No correlation was found between the dose to the bladder and QoL changes. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to early evaluations in the first years, significantly decreasing QoL in the urinary, bowel, and sexual domains was found >5 years after RT. Aging is likely to be a major factor. Younger patients who responded to the treatment had the most favorable long-term QoL results. As 3-dimensional conformal RT was used in this study, intensity modulated concepts could result in improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vanessa Berneking
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael J Eble
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Heath EI, Nanus DM, Slovin S, Strand C, Higano C, Simons VH, Johnson C, Kyriakopoulos CE, Reichert ZR, Lory S, George DJ, Mucci LA, Marcus JD, Trendel JA, Bock CH. Prostate Cancer National Summit's Call to Action. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019; 17:161-168. [PMID: 31085057 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth I Heath
- Karmanos Cancer Institute and Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI.
| | - David M Nanus
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine and Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Susan Slovin
- Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Celestia Higano
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Crawford Johnson
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, and Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Christos E Kyriakopoulos
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Zachery R Reichert
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine and University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Daniel J George
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine and Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Lorelei A Mucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | | | - Jill A Trendel
- Karmanos Cancer Institute and Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | - Cathryn H Bock
- Karmanos Cancer Institute and Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| |
Collapse
|