Management of brain metastasized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) – From local treatment to new systemic therapies

Immune cell-derived exosomes as promising tools for cancer therapy

Exosomes are nanoscale vesicles with a size of 30-150 nm secreted by living cells. They are vital players in cellular communication as they can transport proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and etc. Immune cell-derived exosomes (imEXOs) have great potential for tumor therapy because they have many of the same functions as their parent cells. Especially, imEXOs display unique constitutive characteristics that are directly involved in tumor therapy. Herein, we begin by the biogenesis, preparation, characterization and cargo loading strategies of imEXOs. Next, we focus on therapeutic potentials of imEXOs from different kinds of immune cells against cancer from preclinical and clinical studies. Finally, we discuss advantages of engineered imEXOs and potential risks of imEXOs in cancer treatment. The advantages of engineered imEXOs are highlighted, including selective killing effect, effective tumor targeting, effective lymph node targeting, immune activation and regulation, and good biosafety.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer and brain metastasis

The presence of brain metastases (BM) is a negative prognostic factor for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their incidence seems to be higher in patients with oncogene-driven tumours, especially those with EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged tumours. Although targeted treatments demonstrate significant efficacy regarding BM, they only apply to a minority of NSCLC patients. On the other hand, systemic therapies for nononcogenic-driven NSCLC with BM have shown limited clinical benefit. In recent years, immunotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy has been adopted as a new standard of care in first-line therapy. This approach seems to be beneficial to patients with BM in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Combined immune checkpoint inhibition as well as the combination of immunotherapy and radiation therapy show promising results with significant, but overall acceptable toxicity. A pragmatic approach of allowing enrolment of patients with untreated or symptomatic BM in randomised trials evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors strategies, possibly coupled with central nervous system-related endpoints may be needed to generate data to refine treatment for this patient population.

Cerebrospinal fluid as a liquid biopsy for molecular characterization of brain metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM) is a challenging clinical issue with poor prognosis. No data exist regarding extensive genetic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and its correlation to associated tumor compartments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed a study across multiple NSCLC patients with matched material from four compartments; primary tumor, BM, plasma and CSF. We performed enrichment-based targeted next-generation sequencing analysis of ctDNA and exosomal RNA in CSF and plasma and compared the outcome with the solid tumor compartments.

RESULTS

An average of 105 million reads per sample was generated with fractions of mapped reads exceeding 99% in all samples and with a mean coverage above 10,000x. We observed a high degree of overlap in variants between primary lung tumor and BM. Variants specific for the BM/CSF compartment included in-frame deletions in AR, FGF10 and TSC1 and missense mutations in HNF1a, CD79B, BCL2, MYC, TSC2, TET2, NRG1, MSH3, NOTCH3, VHL and EGFR.

CONCLUSION

Our approach of combining ctDNA and exosomal RNA analyses in CSF presents a potential surrogate for BM biopsy. The specific variants that were only observed in the CNS compartments could serve as targets for individually tailored therapies in NSCLC patients with BM.

Brain metastasis in breast cancer: focus on genes and signaling pathways involved, blood-brain barrier and treatment strategies

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most prevalent types of cancer in women. Despite advancement in early detection and efficient treatment, recurrence and metastasis continue to pose a significant risk to the life of BC patients. Brain metastasis (BM) reported in 17-20 percent of BC patients is considered as a major cause of mortality and morbidity in these patients. BM includes various steps from primary breast tumor to secondary tumor formation. Various steps involved are primary tumor formation, angiogenesis, invasion, extravasation, and brain colonization. Genes involved in different pathways have been reported to be associated with BC cells metastasizing to the brain. ADAM8 gene, EN1 transcription factor, WNT, and VEGF signaling pathway have been associated with primary breast tumor; MMP1, COX2, XCR4, PI3k/Akt, ERK and MAPK pathways in angiogenesis; Noth, CD44, Zo-1, CEMIP, S0X2 and OLIG2 are involved in invasion, extravasation and colonization, respectively. In addition, the blood-brain barrier is also a key factor in BM. Dysregulation of cell junctions, tumor microenvironment and loss of function of microglia leads to BBB disruption ultimately resulting in BM. Various therapeutic strategies are currently used to control the BM in BC. Oncolytic virus therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, mTOR-PI3k inhibitors and immunotherapy have been developed to target various genes involved in BM in BC. In addition, RNA interference (RNAi) and CRISPR/Cas9 are novel interventions in the field of BCBM where research to validate these and clinical trials are being carried out. Gaining a better knowledge of metastasis biology is critical for establishing better treatment methods and attaining long-term therapeutic efficacies against BC. The current review has been compiled with an aim to evaluate the role of various genes and signaling pathways involved in multiple steps of BM in BC. The therapeutic strategies being used currently and the novel ones being explored to control BM in BC have also been discussed at length.

Therapeutic effectiveness and safety of sequential ICIs with radiotherapy for symptomatic brain and bone metastases in NSCLC patients

In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the brain and bones are common metastatic sites, and the disease seriously affects the survival time and quality of life. For metastatic lesions with symptoms, local treatment often precedes systemic treatment. However, in clinical trials, patients with symptomatic brain or bone metastases are often excluded. Therefore, limited data are available on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in those patients. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of local radiotherapy followed by ICIs in driver gene-negative NSCLC patients with symptomatic local metastasis in the brain and bone. This is a 29-month 2 centered retrospective cohort study performed in China between March 2019 and August 2021. A total of 22 patients with advanced NSCLC were included. All patients received radiotherapy in the brain or bone before the administration of ICIs. For all patients, the overall response rate was 59.09%, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months, the PFS rate at 6 months was 72.73%, and the PFS rate at 1 year was 13.64%. Waterfall plots showed that tumor size was mostly reduced compared with baseline. The spider map showed that the tumor continued to shrink. In terms of symptom improvement, 100% pain control and 83.33% improvement were observed in epilepsy and neurological function. Sequential ICIs with local radiotherapy is effective for the treatment of patients with symptomatic brain and bone metastases of driver gene-negative NSCLC, which will benefit patients and improve their symptoms.

KIF20A is associated with clinical prognosis and synergistic effect of gemcitabine combined with ferroptosis inducer in lung adenocarcinoma

Gemcitabine (GEM), an antimetabolite that terminates DNA synthesis, is commonly used in the treatment of cancers including lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, downregulation of sensitivity limits the therapeutic effect. Ferroptosis as the new form of regulated cell death has been shown to have great potential for cancer treatment with chemoresistance. Here, three genes with both ferroptosis and GEM-response-associated features were screened from RNA sequencing and public data for constructing an independent risk model. LUAD patients with different risk scores had differences in mutational landscape, gene enrichment pathways, and drug sensitivity. By Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, flow cytometry, and colony forming assay, we demonstrate that GEM and ferroptosis inducer (FIN) imidazole Ketone Erastin had a synergistic combined anti-proliferative effect on LUAD cells and knockdown of KIF20A (the core gene of our model) further enhanced cell death in vitro by inducing ferroptosis. In conclusion, we identified a link between ferroptosis and GEM response in LUAD cells and developed a robust signature that can effectively classify LUAD patients into subgroups with different overall survival. For LUAD, the combined treatment modality of GEM and FIN is potentially effective and KIF20A may be a new therapeutic target.

Correlation between C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to examine the relationship between the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) and the prognosis of patients with lung adenocarcinoma and thus provide a reference for evaluating the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The clinical data of 130 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The patients' overall survival (OS) time was calculated, and the factors affecting OS were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The CAR was correlated with sex, clinical stage, brain metastasis, S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B), interleukin 17, myelin basic protein, squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), and the lymphocyte count. The median OS was significantly shorter in the high- than low-CAR group (18 vs. 64 months, respectively). The CAR, clinical stage, brain metastasis, S100B, interleukin 17, SCC-Ag, C-reactive protein, albumin, and neutrophil count affected the OS of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. The CAR and clinical stage were independent risk factors for a poor prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAR and clinical stage are independent risk factors for OS in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Exosomal lncRNA LINC01356 Derived From Brain Metastatic Nonsmall-Cell Lung Cancer Cells Remodels the Blood-Brain Barrier

Brain metastasis is a severe complication that affects the survival of lung cancer patients. However, the mechanism of brain metastasis in lung cancer remains unclear. In this study, we constructed an in vitro BBB model and found that cells from the high-metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line H1299 showed a higher capacity to pass through the blood-brain barrier (BBB), as verified by Transwell assays, than cells from the low-metastatic NSCLC cell line A549. Brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) could internalize H1299-derived exosomes, which remarkably promoted A549 cells across the BBB. The BBB-associated exosomal long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) was selected from the RNA-Seq dataset (GSE126548) and verified by real-time PCR and Transwell assays. LncRNA LINC01356 was significantly upregulated in H1299 cells and exosomes derived from these cells compared to that of A549 cells. Moreover, LINC01356 was also upregulated in serum exosomes of patients with NSCLC with brain metastasis compared with those without metastasis. In addition, BMECs treated with LINC01356-deprived exosomes expressed higher junction proteins than those treated with the control exosomes, and silencing LINC01356 in exosomes derived from H1299 cells could inhibit A549 cells from crossing the BBB. These data might indicate that the exosomal lncRNA LINC01356 derived from brain metastatic NSCLC cells plays a key role in remodeling the BBB system, thereby participating in brain metastasis in lung cancer.

State of the Art in Combination Immuno/Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Common origins for brain metastases (BMs) are melanoma, lung, breast, and renal cell cancers. BMs account for a large share of morbidity and mortality caused by these cancers. The advent of new immunotherapeutic treatments has made a revolution in the treatment of cancer patients and particularly, as a new concept, if it is combined with radiotherapy, may lead to considerably longer survival. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the survival rate and toxicities of such a combination in brain metastases.

METHODS

To perform a systematic review of the literature until January 2021 using electronic databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase; the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of cohort studies. For data extraction, two reviewers extracted the data blindly and independently. Hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI), fixed-effect model, and inverse-variance method was calculated. The meta-analysis has been evaluated with the statistical software Stata/MP v.16 (The fastest version of Stata).

RESULTS

In the first step, 494 studies were selected to review the abstracts, in the second step, the full texts of 86 studies were reviewed. Finally, 28 studies were selected consisting of 1465 patients. The addition of IT to RT in the treatment of brain metastasis from melanoma and non-small-cell lung carcinoma was associated with a 39% reduction in mortality rate and has prolonged overall survival, with an acceptable toxicity profile. The addition of IT to RT compared with RT alone has a hazard ratio of 0.39(95% CI 0.34-0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of immuno/radiotherapy (IR) for the treatment of patients with BMs from melanoma and non-small-cell lung carcinoma has prolonged overall survival and reduced mortality rate, with acceptable toxicity. In terms of timing, RT seems to have the best effect on the result when performed before or simultaneously with immunotherapy.

PD-L1 blockade exhibits anti-tumor effect on brain metastasis by activating CD8+ T cells in hematogenous metastasis model with lymphocyte infusion

Brain metastases are common complication in cancer patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors show therapeutic benefits also in patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases. However, their antitumor effects on metastatic tumors and their underlying mechanisms are still poorly understood. In this study we investigated the antitumor effect of anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody on metastatic brain tumors and evaluated immune responses during treatment. We employed a hematogenous brain metastasis xenograft model using immunodeficient mice with murine lymphocyte infusions. A human non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line stably expressing NanoLuc^® reporter (Nluc-H1915) was inoculated from the internal carotid artery of SCID mice. After metastases were established (24 days after inoculation), splenocytes prepared from H1915-immunized BALB/c mice were injected intravenously and mouse IgG or anti-PD-L1 antibody treatment was started (day 1). Evaluated by Nluc activity, tumor volume in the brain on day 14 was significantly lower in anti-PD-L1-treated mice than in mouse IgG-treated mice. Furthermore CD8⁺ cells were primarily infiltrated intratumorally and peritumorally and anti-PD-L1 treatment induced a significantly higher proportion of Granzyme B (GzmB)⁺ cells among CD8⁺ T cells. The antitumor effect of anti-PD-L1 antibody on brain metastasis is thought to be achieved by the enhanced activation of infiltrated CD8⁺ T cells into metastatic brain tumor. These results suggest that anti-PD-L1 antibody-containing regimens may be promising treatment options for cancer patients with brain metastases.

The number of brain metastases predicts the survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation status

Background

Lung cancer is the common cause of cancer‐related deaths throughout the world, and brain is a frequent metastatic site of lung cancer.

Aim

This research sought to evaluate the impact of the number of brain metastases in prognosticating non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients accounting to the role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations.

Methods and Results

NSCLC patients with brain metastases diagnosed/treated in West China Hospital, Sichuan University between 2009 and 2017 were identified retrospectively. Kaplan–Meier approach was adopted to estimate OS. And we performed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses of characteristics related to overall survival (OS) in both EGFR‐mutated and wild‐type cohorts. In total, this study included 611 eligible NSCLC patients with brain metastases. Extracranial metastases and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors of OS in both cohorts. As the disease progressed, EGFR‐mutated patients had brain metastasis significantly earlier (P < .0001), but they also had notably better survival outcomes than wild‐type patients (P < .0001). And the number of brain metastases impacted the survival incidence in the progression significantly in both EGFR‐mutated and wild‐type groups (P = .0087/.037, respectively).

Conclusion

The number of brain metastases was a prognostic factor for lung cancer patients either with EGFR mutations or with wild‐type EGFR, with larger number indicating more unfavorble clinical outcomes. Patients with EGFR mutations had a better survival.

Response and safety of whole-brain radiotherapy plus temozolomide for patients with brain metastases of non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of the present work was to investigate the response and safety of whole‐brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plus temozolomide (TMZ) for patients with brain metastases of non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

The electronic databases of Pubmed, EMbase, Cochrane, Wangfang, china national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI), and Google scholar were systematically searched to identify the prospective randomized trials relevant to WBRT plus TMZ for patients with brain metastases of NSCLC. The data associated with treatment response and toxicity were extracted from original included studies. The relative risk (RR) for treatment response and toxicity between WBRT+TMZ and WBRT alone was pooled by fixed or random effect model. Publication bias was investigated by Begg's funnel plot and Egger's line regression test.

Results

Twenty‐five clinical trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta‐analysis. The pooled results showed WBRT+TMZ can significant improve the objective response rate (ORR) compared with WBRT alone (RR = 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32–1.55, p < 0.05) under a fixed effect model. WBRT+TMZ significantly increased the III–IV hematological toxicity compared to WBRT alone (RR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.12–2.54, p < 0.05) in the fixed effect model. Grade III–IV gastrointestinal toxicity was increased in WBRT+TMZ compared to WBRT alone (RR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.29–2.30, p < 0.05). Begg's funnel plot and Egger's line regression test indicated publication bias.

Conclusion

Based on the present work, WBRT+TMZ can improve the ORR for brain metastases of NSCLC, but the risk of treatment‐associated grade III/IV hematological toxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity were also increased compared to WBRT alone.

Research Progress and Challenges in the Treatment of Central Nervous System Metastasis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common malignant tumors and has high morbidity and mortality rates. Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is one of the most frequent complications in patients with NSCLC and seriously affects the quality of life (QOL) and overall survival (OS) of patients, with a median OS of untreated patients of only 1-3 months. There are various treatment methods for NSCLC CNS metastasis, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, which do not meet the requirements of patients in terms of improving OS and QOL. There are still many problems in the treatment of NSCLC CNS metastasis that need to be solved urgently. This review summarizes the research progress in the treatment of NSCLC CNS metastasis to provide a reference for clinical practice.

Blood-Brain Barrier, Cell Junctions, and Tumor Microenvironment in Brain Metastases, the Biological Prospects and Dilemma in Therapies

Brain metastasis is the most commonly seen brain malignancy, frequently originating from lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. Brain tumor has its unique cell types, anatomical structures, metabolic constraints, and immune environment, which namely the tumor microenvironment (TME). It has been discovered that the tumor microenvironment can regulate the progression, metastasis of primary tumors, and response to the treatment through the particular cellular and non-cellular components. Brain metastasis tumor cells that penetrate the brain–blood barrier and blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier to alter the function of cell junctions would lead to different tumor microenvironments. Emerging evidence implies that these tumor microenvironment components would be involved in mechanisms of immune activation, tumor hypoxia, antiangiogenesis, etc. Researchers have applied various therapeutic strategies to inhibit brain metastasis, such as the combination of brain radiotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies. Unfortunately, they hardly access effective treatment. Meanwhile, most clinical trials of target therapy patients with brain metastasis are always excluded. In this review, we summarized the clinical treatment of brain metastasis in recent years, as well as their influence and mechanisms underlying the differences between the composition of tumor microenvironments in the primary tumor and brain metastasis. We also look forward into the feasibility and superiority of tumor microenvironment-targeted therapies in the future, which may help to improve the strategy of brain metastasis treatment.

High Density of NRF2 Expression in Malignant Cells Is Associated with Increased Risk of CNS Metastasis in Early-Stage NSCLC

Simple Summary

We retrospectively analyzed 304 patients with surgically removed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Multiplex antibody staining of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) and thioredoxin reductase 1 (TrxR1) was conducted and scored in cytokeratin-positive (CK+) cells within the whole-tissue core as well as the tumor and stromal compartments of each tissue microarray (TMA) core. A high density of NRF2+/CK+ cells in the whole-tissue core compartment was an independent prognostic factor, with an eightfold increase in odds regarding the risk of relapse in the central nervous system (CNS). This is the first study to report a tumor-cell-associated protein biomarker for CNS relapse in early-stage lung cancer and the first trial to report the correlation between NRF2 expression and risk of CNS relapse. The results of our study may have an impact on the follow-up strategy for early-stage NSCLC patients and eventually improve their prognosis.

Abstract

Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) protein expression promotes cancer progression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its role in the clinical setting has not been established. We retrospectively analyzed data from 304 patients with surgically removed NSCLC. Multiplex antibody staining of NRF2 and thioredoxin reductase 1 (TrxR1) was conducted and scored in cytokeratin-positive (CK+) cells within the whole-tissue core as well as the tumor and stromal compartments of each tissue microarray (TMA) core. A high density of NRF2+/CK+ cells in the whole-tissue core compartment was correlated with a higher risk of central nervous system (CNS) relapse OR = 7.36 (95% CI: 1.64–33.06). The multivariate analysis showed an OR = 8.00 (95% CI: 1.70–37.60) for CNS relapse in NRF2+/CK+ high-density cases. The density of TrxR1+/CK+ cells failed to show any statistically significant risk of relapse. The OS analyses for NRF2+/CK+ and TrxR1+/CK+ cell density failed to show any statistical significance. This is the first study to report a correlation between NRF2+/CK+ cell density and the risk of CNS relapse in early-stage NSCLC. The results of our study may impact the follow-up strategy for early-stage NSCLC patients and eventually improve their prognosis.

WBRT for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: for whom and when?-Contemporary point of view

The incidence of brain metastases (BM) is estimated between 20% and 40% of patients with solid cancer. The most common cause of this failure is lung cancer, and in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) BM represent a common site of relapse in 30-55% cases. The basic criteria of therapeutic decision-making are based on the significant prognostic factors which are components of prognostic scores. The standard approach to treatment of BM from NSCLC include whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) which is used as adjuvant modality after local therapy (surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery) or as primary treatment and it remains the primary modality of treatment for patients with multiple metastases. WBRT is also used in combination with systemic therapy. The aim of presented review of literature is trying to answer which patients with BM from NSCLC should receive WBRT and when it could be omitted. There were presented the aspects of application of WBRT in relation to (I) choice between WBRT or the best supportive care and (II) employment of WBRT in combination with local treatment modalities [surgical resection or stereotactic radio-surgery (SRS)] and/or with systemic therapy. According to data from literature we concluded that the most important factor that needs to be considered when assessing the suitability of a patient for WBRT is the patient's prognosis based on the Lung-molGPA score. WBRT should be applied in treatment of multiple BM from lung cancer in patients with favourable prognosis and in in patients with presence of EML4-ALK translocation before therapy with crizotinib. Whereas WBRT could be omitted in patients with poor prognosis and after primary SRS.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in non-small cell lung cancer: evidence and future development

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BM) will affect up to 50% of patients during whole disease period. BM themselves impact heavily not only on patient’s prognosis but also are a source of symptoms aggravating quality of life. Standard (pemetrexed), and non-standard chemotherapy (temozolomide) in patients with NSCLC failed to prevent them from BM. In terms of systemic treatment there are promising results showed when durvalumab (PACIFIC study), osimertinib (FLAURA trial) or alectinib (JALEX study) was used. However, those substances are effective only in small cohort with ALK or EGFR alterations. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) as a non-specific treatment has proven to be a powerful tool in preventing BM without affecting overall survival in neither way. That has been proved in nearly all earlier and all recent studies—NVALT11/DLCRG-02, RTOG 0214 update, Li et al. The positive effect of BM incidence reduction may draw fear form PCI usage due to potential cognitive toxicity the PCI may cause. Results of recent trials show that after PCI only mild cognitive disorders (MCD) may arise. Promising results in terms of reducing MCD are shown when memantine is used or/and hippocampal avoidance techniques are implemented. HA in PCI seem to be cost effective but calculations were made on small-cell lung cancer cohorts. Still even recent studies did not clarify finally which patients could benefit from PCI or other forms of preventing BM. It seems that new trials should focus on younger, fit and non-squamous histology patients and use the tests for mild cognitive disorders (MoCA, BHA) rather than screening tests for dementia (MMSE, HVLT, ADL). The main obstacle in performing new trials on PCI in NSCLC cohorts may be, however, patients’ accrual, as a difficulty which occurred during latest trials.

Systemic Therapy for Mutation-Driven NSCLC

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, and patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer have traditionally had a poor prognosis. An improved understanding of targetable oncogenic molecular alterations has led to a growing number of effective and first-line therapies in targeted patient populations. This review provides an overview of systemic therapy options available for patients with mutation-driven nonsmall cell lung cancer, as well as a discussion of data regarding safety when combined with radiation therapy.

The impact of baseline brain metastases on clinical benefits and progression patterns after first-line crizotinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer

Baseline brain metastasis (BBM) commonly occurs in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. Crizotinib prolongs the survival of patients with ALK rearrangement but lacks significant effect on brain metastasis. It remains unclear whether BBM and local therapy affect therapeutic outcomes and progression patterns during crizotinib treatment.Patients with ALK-positive (immunotherapy) non-small cell lung cancer were screened from West China Hospital between May 2013 and January 2019. A total of 155 patients were enrolled in this research, with entirely recorded statistics to analyze retrospectively.Baseline brain metastasis occurred in 64 patients (55.7%). Thirty-seven patients received local therapy, while 24 patients did not. We observed higher overall response rate in patients receiving local therapy (70.2% vs. 41.7%, P = .026), but no statistical difference was found in median progression free survival (mPFS) (12.0 months vs 13.0 months, P = .633). A significantly shorter mPFS was found in patients not receiving local treatment compared with the 16.5 months mPFS of patients without BBM (P = .029). Intracranial progressions were recorded in 35 patients with BBM (71%) and 16 patients who don't have (30%). As for extracranial progression, there is a higher occurrence rate (75.5%) in patients who had baseline extracranial metastases versus 49.0% in BBM patients. A significantly higher occurrence rate of multiple progression was noted in patients with BBM (14/49 vs. 6/53).Baseline intracranial metastasis changes the location and number of progressions after the first-line crizotinib and results in poor prognosis. There is no evidence that local treatment for brain metastasis had a protective effect on intracranial progression.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer: focus on challenging populations

In recent years, immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have represented one of the major breakthroughs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer treatment scenario. However, enrollment in registering clinical trials is usually restricted, since frail patients (i.e., elderly, individuals with poor performance status and/or active brain metastases), as well as patients with chronic infections or who take concurrent medications, such as steroids, are routinely excluded. Thus, safety and efficacy of ICIs for these subgroups have not been adequately assessed in clinical trials, although these populations often occur in clinical practice. We reviewed the available data regarding the use of ICIs in these 'special' populations, including a focus on the issues raised by the administration of immunotherapy in lung cancer patients infected with Sars-Cov-2.

Outcome of Patients with NSCLC and Brain Metastases Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in a 'Real-Life' Setting

Simple Summary

We identified non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden and University Hospital of Heraklion, Greece from 2016 to 2019. We analyzed intracranial efficacies in the patients who had not received local treatment for their brain metastases less than three months prior to the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors and had adequate radiological evaluation. We demonstrated that immune checkpoint inhibitors are active in NSCLC patients with brain metastases regardless of the presence of neurological symptoms. This is a novel finding since, until now, this patient group has irrefutably been underrepresented in clinical studies and there is a clear scarcity of data. The results of our analyses suggest that symptomatic patients with active brain metastases (BM) may be considered for immunotherapy in routine clinical practice as well as clinical trials.

Abstract

There is lack of data addressing the intracranial (IC) efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on brain metastases (BM) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This patient category is underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. We retrospectively collected clinical data on patients with non-oncogenic driven NSCLC with BM who were treated with ICIs at two medical oncology institutes in Sweden and Greece from 2016 to 2019. IC efficacy was assessed in patients who had not received local treatment for BM less than three months prior to the initiation of ICIs and had adequate radiological evaluation. We screened 280 patients, of which 51 had BM. BM was an independent predictor for inferior PFS (HR = 2.27; 95% CI, 1.53–3.36) but not OS (HR = 1.58; 95% CI, 0.97–2.60) for the whole patient population. IC response assessment was done on 33 patients. IC objective response rate (ORR) was 24.2%. The presence of neurological symptoms related to BM did not affect IC ORR (p = 0.48). High PD-L1 levels from extracranial biopsies were not a predictive factor for IC ORR (p = 0.13). ICIs are active in NSCLC patients with BM regardless of the presence of neurological symptoms and can achieve durable IC disease stabilization in a subgroup of patients.

KIAA1429 promotes the progression of lung adenocarcinoma by regulating the m6A level of MUC3A

OBJECTIVE

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the most frequently occurring human malignancies worldwide, but its potential molecular mechanism has not yet been fully elucidated. N6-methyladenosine (m6A), the most common internal chemical modification of mRNAs, is implicated in diverse pathological processes in different human malignancies, but its functions in LUAD remain elusive. The current study aimed to investigate the function and molecular mechanism of KIAA1429 in LUAD.

METHODS

The KIAA1429 expression level in LUAD tissues was assessed using databases and was detected in LUAD cells and tissues via quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blot. m6A levels in LUAD tissues and cells were quantified. Next, correlation between the KIAA1429 expression level and the clinical and pathological features and prognosis of patients with LUAD was analyzed. Further, KIAA1429 levels were decreased, and LUAD cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and cycle were assessed. Prediction websites revealed the aberrant expression and probable methylation modification of MUC3A in LUAD, and correlation between MUC3A and KIAA1429 was analyzed. Ultimately, the impact of the KIAA1429 expression on MUC3A-mediated malignant phenotypes of LUAD was examined by a torsion test.

RESULTS

KIAA1429 expression was remarkably high and m6A level was aberrantly elevated in LUAD cells and tissues. In addition, high KIAA1429 expression indicated a larger tumor diameter, higher tumor-node-metastasis stage, greater proneness to lymph node and distant metastasis, and lower overall survival rate. siRNA-triggered KIAA1429 downregulation dramatically suppressed LUAD cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that MUC3A was expressed in LUAD at an unusually high level and may be methylated under the control of KIAA1429. Western blot, qRT-PCR, and correlation analyses revealed a positive correlation between KIAA1429 expression level and MUC3A. Finally, torsion test results revealed that low KIAA1429 expression reversed LUAD cell migration, proliferation, and invasion facilitated by low MUC3A expression as well as cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase.

CONCLUSION

KIAA1429 exhibited an unusually high expression in LUAD cells and tissues, and high KIAA1429 expression was correlated with the clinical and pathological features of patients with LUAD, thereby leading to an unsatisfactory prognosis. Furthermore, KIAA1429 regulates MUC3A expression through m6A modification to modulate LUAD cells to proliferate, migrate, invade, and induce cell cycle arrest.

Outcomes in Patients With Non-small-cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases Treated With Pembrolizumab-based Therapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and untreated brain metastases (BM) have been excluded from most trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Real-world evidence on efficacy and survival outcomes of ICIs in patients with BM is limited.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients with mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy and compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with and without BM using Kaplan-Meier and Cox methodology. We also characterized systemic and intracranial objective response rate (ORR) and treatment details, including timing of cranial irradiation.

RESULTS

Between Augutst 2013 and December 2018, 570 patients with mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab-based therapy were analyzed. Of 126 (22.1%) patients with BM, 96 (76.2%) had treated BM (local therapy prior to pembrolizumab), and 30 (23.8%) had untreated BM. Of patients with untreated BM, 17 (56.7%) underwent radiation within 30 days after pembrolizumab initiation. In the remaining 13 (43.3%) treated with pembrolizumab-based therapy alone, intracranial ORR was 36.4%. Patients with and without BM did not have significantly different systemic ORR (27.8% vs. 29.7%; P = .671), PFS (mPFS 9.2 vs. 7.7 months; P = .609), or OS (mOS 18.0 vs. 18.7 months; P = .966). Factors associated with improved survival on Cox analysis included female gender, performance status, adenocarcinoma histology, and first-line therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BM did not have inferior survival to patients without BM after treatment with pembrolizumab-based therapy. In the current era, BM may not automatically confer inferior survival, and should not exclude patients from receiving pembrolizumab-based therapy.

Downregulated Mucin 1 alleviates paclitaxel resistance in non‑small cell lung cancer cells

Multidrug resistance of non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a common clinical problem, which is one of the main reasons leading to the failure of chemotherapy. Therefore, how to overcome or prevent drug resistance has become a hot and difficult issue in clinical research. The present study was designed to investigate the expression patterns, functions and underlying mechanisms of MUC1 in regulating paclitaxel‑resistant cell line A549/PR in NSCLC. RT‑qPCR and western blot was performed to determine the mRNA and protein level, respectively. CCK‑8 was conducted to determine the cell viability of A549/PR cells. Moreover, flow cytometry assay was applied to examine the apoptosis rate of A549/PR. Herein, the MUC1 was over‑expressed in clinic NSCLC tissues and A549/PR cells. Silence of MUC1 could obviously suppress the proliferation and promote apoptosis of A549/PR cells in treatment of paclitaxel through up‑regulating the expression of Bax and Caspase‑3, and down‑regulating the expression of Bcl‑2, suggesting that chemotherapy combined with the modulation of MUC1 might be characterized as a promising therapeutic approach to overcome paclitaxel‑resistance in NSCLC in the future.

An immune gene expression signature distinguishes central nervous system metastases from primary tumours in non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Dissemination of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the central nervous system is a frequent and challenging clinical problem. Systemic or local therapies rarely prolong survival and have modest activity regarding local control. Alterations in gene expression in brain metastasis versus primary tumour may increase aggressiveness and impair therapeutic efforts.

METHODS

We identified 25 patients with surgically removed NSCLC brain metastases in two different patient cohorts. For 13 of these patients, primary tumour samples were available. Gene expression analysis using the nCounter® PanCancer Immune Profiling gene expression panel (nanoString technologies Inc.) was performed in brain metastases and primary tumour samples. Identification of differentially expressed genes was conducted on normalized data using the nSolver analysis software.

RESULTS

We compared gene expression patterns in brain metastases with primary tumours. Brain metastasis samples displayed a distinct clustering pattern compared to primary tumour samples with a statistically significant downregulation of genes related to immune response and immune cell activation. Results from KEGG term analysis on differentially expressed genes revealed a concomitant enrichment of multiple KEGG terms associated with the immune system. We identified a 12-gene immune signature that clearly separated brain metastases from primary tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a unique gene downregulation pattern in brain metastases compared with primary tumours. This finding may explain the lower intracranial efficacy of systemic therapy, especially immunotherapy, in brain metastasis of patients with NSCLC.

Icotinib is as efficacious as gefitinib for brain metastasis of EGFR mutated non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases is very poor. Currently, therapeutic methods for this patient population include whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), surgery, radiosurgery and systemic treatment. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) could be effective on cerebral metastases of mutated NSCLC. However, which EGFR-TKIs is more appropriate is still unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of advanced NSCLC patients with brain metastases for EGFR targeted therapy from November 2013 to April 2018 at Dongguan People's Hospital, Southern Medical University, China. A total of 43 patients were recruit in this study. Among them, 21 cases received icotinib (125 mg, thrice a day) and 22 cases received gefitinib (250 mg, once a day) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point of this study was intracranial PFS (iPFS). The relationships between therapeutic arms and patients characteristics were performed using Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. The differences in PFS among the two arms were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank tests.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference of intracranial ORR (66.6% versus 59.1%, P = 0.62) and DCR (85.7% versus 81.8%, P = 0.73) between the two arms. The median intracranial PFS (iPFS) for icotinib and gefitinib arms were 8.4 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 11.3 months) and 10.6 months (95% CI, 6.3 to 14.8 months), respectively (P = 0.17). Adverse events of the two study arms were generally mild. None of the patients experienced dose reduction of EGFR-TKIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that icotinib and gefitinib had similar efficacy for brain metastasis of EGFR mutated NSCLC. Large randomized studies are suggested to further illuminate the effect of these two EGFR-TKIs on cerebral lesions of NSCLC.

Use of Programmed Death Receptor-1 and/or Programmed Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Brain Metastasis of Lung Cancer

The central nervous system (CNS) is regarded as an immune privileged environment; however, changes in the neuroimmunology paradigm have led to an increased interest in systematic immunotherapy in lung cancer therapy. The presence of the lymphatic system in the CNS as well as the physiological and biochemical changes in the blood–brain barrier in the tumor microenvironment suggests that immunocytes are fully capable of entering and exiting the CNS. Emerging clinical data suggest that inhibitors of programmed death receptor-1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) can stimulate surrounding T cells and thus have antitumor effects in the CNS. For example, PD-1 antibody (pembrolizumab) monotherapy has displayed a 20–30% encephalic response rate in patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer. Combined application of nivolumab and ipilimumab anti-PD-1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 showed an encephalic response rate of 55% in patients with brain metastases of melanoma. Further evidence is required to verify these response rates and identify the mechanisms of curative effects and drug tolerance. While regional treatments such as whole-brain radiosurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and brain surgery remain the mainstream, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors display potential decreased neurotoxic effects. To date, five drugs have been approved for use in patients with encephalic metastases of lung carcinoma: the anti-PD-1 drugs, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, and the anti-PD-L1 agents, atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab. In recent years, clinical trials of inhibitors in combination with other drugs to treat brain metastasis have also emerged. This review summarizes the biological principles of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for brain metastasis of lung cancer, as well as ongoing clinical trials to explore unmet needs.

[Targeted Therapies for Driver Gene Mutation-positive Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastasis]

脑是晚期肺癌转移最常见的部位，驱动基因阳性者脑转移发病率更高，肺癌脑转移患者预后较差，且不同治疗方式的选择影响肺癌脑转移患者的病程转归及预后。近年来，随着精准医学的发展，针对肺癌脑转移，尤其是具有特殊靶点的驱动基因阳性患者治疗方式的选择越来越成为人们的研究热点，并逐步取得进展。本文主要阐述了肺癌脑转移治疗存在的挑战，系统综述了驱动基因阳性肺癌脑转移的靶向治疗进展，以期在精准医学时代下，指导此类患者临床实践中个体化精准治疗方案的抉择。

Clinical implications of an analysis of pharmacokinetics of crizotinib coadministered with dexamethasone in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Dexamethasone is a systemic corticosteroid and a known cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A inducer. Crizotinib is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of ALK, ROS1, and MET and a substrate of CYP3A. This post hoc analysis characterized the use of concomitant CYP3A inducers with crizotinib and estimated the effect of dexamethasone use on crizotinib pharmacokinetics at steady state.

METHODS

This analysis used data from four clinical studies (PROFILE 1001, 1005, 1007, and 1014) including 1690 patients with non-small cell lung cancer with ALK or ROS1 rearrangements treated with crizotinib at 250 mg twice daily. Frequency and reasons for use of concomitant CYP3A inducers, including dexamethasone, with crizotinib were characterized. Multiple steady-state trough concentrations (C_trough,ss) of crizotinib were measured for each patient. A linear mixed-effects model was used for within-patient comparison of crizotinib C_trough,ss between dosing of crizotinib alone and crizotinib coadministered with dexamethasone consecutively for ≥ 21 days.

RESULTS

Dexamethasone was the most commonly used CYP3A inducer (30.4%). A total of 15 patients had crizotinib C_trough,ss for both crizotinib dosing with and without dexamethasone. The adjusted geometric mean ratio of crizotinib C_trough,ss following coadministration with dexamethasone relative to crizotinib without dexamethasone, as a percentage, was 98.2% (90% confidence interval, 79.1-122.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Crizotinib plasma exposure following coadministration with dexamethasone was similar to that when crizotinib was administered without dexamethasone, indicating dexamethasone has no effect on crizotinib exposure or efficacy. Other CYP3A inducers with similar potency would likewise have no clinically relevant effect on crizotinib exposure.

Brain metastases in resected non-small cell lung cancer: The impact of different tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) on the survival of brain metastases (BM) in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We selected the patients who had developed metastatic NSCLC; analyzed the differences between brain metastases and other sites of metastases, including patient characteristics, EGFR status, and survival; and selected the patients who had BM for further investigation. We also compared the treatment effects of first-generation TKIs with those of second-/third-generation TKIs.

Results

A total of 785 cases of stage I-IIIa NSCLC were reviewed. Thirty-six (4.6%) patients were identified as having BM. Among them, 14 patients had a mutated EGFR status. No association between EGFR mutation and the incidence of BM was observed (p = 0.199). Patients with mutated EGFRs had significantly longer overall survival and post-recurrence survival than patients with wild-type EGFR mutation (p = 0.001 for both). However, there was no survival difference between patients with exon 19 and exon 21 mutations (p = 0.426). Furthermore, patients who received the second- and/or third-generation EGFR-TKIs had better survival than patients who only received first-generation EGFR-TKIs (p = 0.031). A multivariate analysis indicated that the next-generation TKIs (HR, 0.007; 95% CI, 0.000 to 0.556; p = 0.026) and a longer interval before BM development (HR, 0.848; 95% CI, 0.733 to 0.980; p = 0.025) were significant factors in longer survival.

Conclusions

EGFR-TKIs were effective in treating NSCLC patients with BM after curative pulmonary surgery, especially in those patients harboring EGFR mutations. Furthermore, the second-/third-generation EGFR-TKIs showed more promising results than the first-generation EGFR-TKIs in treating those particular patients, though larger studies needed to further prove the results.

Comparing the efficacy of concurrent EGFR-TKI and whole-brain radiotherapy vs EGFR-TKI alone as a first-line therapy for advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastases: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a global public health problem, and brain is a common metastatic site in advanced NSCLC. Currently, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) remains a major treatment for brain metastases, while EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the standard treatment for advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, which is also effective for brain metastases. However, whether EGFR-TKIs plus radiotherapy is superior to EGFR-TKIs alone for the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLS with brain metastases remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of concurrent EGFR-TKIs and WBRT vs EGFR-TKI alone in a retrospective cohort of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLS with brain metastases.

Patients and methods

The medical records of 104 treatment-naïve, advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases were retrospectively reviewed, and there were 56 patients undergoing concurrent EGFR-TKI and WBRT, and 48 patients given EGFR-TKI alone, including 20 cases with salvage WBRT upon brain metastasis progression. The survival prognosis was compared between the two cohorts.

Results

The baseline clinicopathologic factors were balanced between the two cohorts. After a median follow-up of 23 months, 35.6% of the study subjects survived. Concurrent EGFR-TKI and WBRT significantly improved the median intracranial PFS (iPFS) compared with EGFR-TKI alone (17.7 vs 11.0 months, P=0.015); however, no significant difference was seen in median overall survival between the two cohorts (28.1 vs 24.0 months, P=0.756). In addition, the median iPFS was found to significantly vary in the number of brain metastases (≤3 vs>3 metastases: 18.0 vs 12.5 months, P=0.044). Subgroup analysis showed that concurrent EGFR-TKI and WBRT improved median iPFS compared with EGFR-TKI alone in patients with more than three brain metastases (P=0.001); however, no significant difference was observed between the two regimens in patients with three or less brain metastases (P=0.526).

Conclusion

Our data demonstrate that concurrent EGFR-TKI and WBRT achieves longer iPFS than EGFR-TKI alone in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC with brain metastases. In advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC with three or less brain metastases, EGFR-TKI alone may be an option as a first-line therapy.

Therapeutic Schedule Evaluation for Brain-Metastasized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with A Probabilistic Linguistic ELECTRE II Method

With the rapid development of modern medicine, therapeutic schedules of brain-metastasized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are expanding. To assist a patient who suffers from brain-metastasized NSCLC to select the most suitable therapeutic schedule, firstly, we establish an indicator system for evaluating the therapeutic schedules; then, we propose a probabilistic linguistic ELECTRE II method to handle the corresponding evaluation problem for the following reasons: (1) probabilistic linguistic information is effective to depict the uncertainty of the therapeutic process and the fuzziness of an expert’s cognition; (2) the ELECTRE II method can deal with evaluation indicators that do not meet a fully compensatory relationship. Simulation tests on the parameters in the proposed method are provided to discuss their impacts on the final rankings. Furthermore, we apply the proposed method to help a patient with brain-metastasized NSCLC at the Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute to choose the optimal therapeutic schedule, and we present some sensitive analyses and comparative analyses to demonstrate the stability and applicability of the proposed method.

Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Versus Observation in Radically Treated Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Phase III NVALT-11/DLCRG-02 Study

Purpose The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) reduces the incidence of symptomatic brain metastases in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with curative intention. Patients and Methods Patients with stage III NSCLC-staged with a contrast-enhanced brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging-were randomly assigned to either observation or PCI after concurrent/sequential chemoradiotherapy with or without surgery. The primary end point-development of symptomatic brain metastases at 24 months-was defined as one or a combination of key symptoms that suggest brain metastases-signs of increased intracranial pressure, headache, nausea and vomiting, cognitive or affective disturbances, seizures, and focal neurologic symptoms-and magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography demonstrating the existence of brain metastasis. Adverse effects, survival, quality of life, quality-adjusted survival, and health care costs were secondary end points. Results Between 2009 and 2015, 175 patients were randomly assigned: 87 received PCI and 88 underwent observation only. Median follow-up was 48.5 months (95% CI, 39 to 54 months). Six (7.0%) of 86 patients in the PCI group and 24 (27.2%) of 88 patients in the control group had symptomatic brain metastases ( P = .001). PCI significantly increased the time to develop symptomatic brain metastases (hazard ratio, 0.23; [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.56]; P = .0012). Median time to develop brain metastases was not reached in either arm. Overall survival was not significantly different between both arms. Grade 1 and 2 memory impairment (26 of 86 v seven of 88 patients) and cognitive disturbance (16 of 86 v three of 88 patients) were significantly increased in the PCI arm. Quality of life was only decreased 3 months post-PCI and was similar to the observation arm thereafter. Conclusion PCI significantly decreased the proportion of patients who developed symptomatic brain metastases with an increase of low-grade toxicity.

Diversity of brain metastases screening and management in non-small cell lung cancer in Europe: Results of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group survey

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BM) are frequent in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but there is a lack of evidence-based management of this patient group. We aimed to capture a snapshot of routine BM management in Europe to identify relevant research questions for future clinical trials.

METHODS

An EORTC Lung Cancer Group (LCG) online survey containing questions on NSCLC BM screening and treatment was distributed between 16/02/17 and 15/06/17 to worldwide EORTC LCG members, and through several European scientific societies in the thoracic oncology field.

RESULTS

A total of 462 European physician responses (394 institutions) were analysed (radiation oncologist: 53% [n = 247], pulmonologist: 26% [n = 119], medical oncologist: 18% [n = 84]; 84% with >5 years' experience in NSCLC). Italy (18%, n = 85), Netherlands (15%, n = 68), UK (14%, n = 66), and France (12%, n = 55) contributed most. 393 physicians (85%) screened neurologically asymptomatic patients for BM at diagnosis (52% using magnetic resonance imaging). Most often screened patients were those with a driver mutation (MUT+; 51%, n = 234), stage III (63%, n = 289), and IV (43%, n = 199). 158 physicians (34%) used a prognostic classification to guide initial treatment decisions, and in 50%, lowest prognostic-score threshold to receive treatment differed between MUT+ and non-driver mutation (MUT-) patients. MUT+ patients with >4 BM were more likely to receive stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) compared with MUT- (27% versus. 21%; p < 0.01). Most physicians (90%) had access to SRS. After single BM surgery, 50% systematically prescribed SRS or WBRT, and 45% only in case of incomplete resection. The preferred treatment in neurologically asymptomatic treatment-naive patients diagnosed with >5 BM was systemic treatment (79%). Of all, 45%/49% physicians stated that all tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockers were discontinued (timing varied) during SRS/WBRT, respectively. Drugs most often continued during SRS/WBRT were erlotinib (44%/40%), gefitinib (39%/34%), afatinib (29%/25%), crizotinib (33%/26%) and anti-PD-(L)-1 (28%/22%).

CONCLUSION

BM management is highly variable in Europe: screening is not uniform, prognostic classifications are not often used and MUT+ NSCLC patients generally receive more intensive local treatment. Prospective assessment of BM management in MUT+ NSCLC patients is required.

Prognostic factors affecting survival after whole brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastasized lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the standard of care for multiple NSCLC brain metastases but due to its toxicity and lack of survival benefit, its use in the palliative setting is being questioned.

PATIENT AND METHODS

This was a single institution cohort study including brain metastasized lung cancer patients who received WBRT at Karolinska University Hospital. Information about Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA) and Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) scores, demographics, histopathological results and received oncological therapy were collected. Predictors of overall survival (OS) from the time of received WBRT were identified by Cox regression analyses. OS between GPA and RPA classes were compared by pairwise log rank test. A subgroup OS analysis was performed stratified by RPA class.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 280 patients. RPA 1 and 2 classes had better OS compared to class 3, patients with GPA <1.5 points had better OS compared to GPA≥ 1.5 points and age >70 years was associated with worse OS (p< .0001 for all comparisons). In RPA class 2 subgroup analysis GPA ≥1.5 points, age ≤70 years and CNS surgery before salvage WBRT were independent positive prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

RPA class 3 patients should not receive WBRT, whereas RPA class 1 patients should receive WBRT if clinically indicated. RPA class 2 patients with age ≤70 years and GPA ≥1.5 points should be treated as RPA 1. WBRT should be omitted in RPA 2 patients with age >70. In RPA 2 patients with age ≤70 years and GPA <1.5 points WBRT could be a reasonable option.

The Current Role of Whole Brain Radiation Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

The incidence of brain metastases has increased in patients with NSCLC as a result of better systemic disease control and advances in imaging modalities. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the mainstay treatment of multiple symptomatic brain metastases for years. A number of recent publications have questioned its place in the absence of a survival and quality of life benefit and the possible risk for long-term neurotoxicity. Omission or deferral of WBRT and strategies consisting of stereotactic radiosurgery or delivery of systemic therapies alone are being proposed more and more. However, critical analysis of the literature shows that WBRT still has relevant indications in well-selected patients. Within this review, we discuss the place of WBRT in the modern management of patients with NSCLC.