Evaluation for therapeutic measures to small gastric stromal tumor: A retrospective study of 90 cases

Association between calcification and risk stratification in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Risk assessment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), particularly those with a diameter ≤ 5 cm, remains a clinical challenge. Previous research has primarily focused on tumor size, ulceration, necrosis, and enhancement patterns, with less emphasis on the role of tumor calcification, which remains controversial regarding its correlation with malignancy risk.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the characteristics of calcification in gastric GISTs and its correlation with risk stratification as defined by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), to improve preoperative risk assessment for gastric GISTs ≤ 5 cm.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 385 pathologically confirmed gastric GIST patients, including 178 with small gastric GISTs (< 2 cm), was conducted. Tumors were categorized into low-risk (very low / low) and high-risk (intermediate / high) groups based on NIH criteria. Variables such as age, gender, tumor long-axis diameter, calcification rates, calcification size, the number and distribution of calcification, calcification to tumor long-axis diameter ratio were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of malignancy for gastric GISTs, with predictive values assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between high-risk and low-risk groups in treatment methods, tumor long-axis diameter, the ratio of calcification to tumor long-axis, and calcification distribution (P < 0.05). Calcification rates varied across risk categories, with 23.6% in very low-risk, 31.6% in low-risk, 9.8% in intermediate-risk, and 31.7% in high-risk categories (P < 0.05). In GISTs ≤ 5 cm, both tumor long-axis diameter (OR = 3.07, 95% CI: 2.29-4.10) and calcification (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.13-0.97) were independent predictors of malignancy risk (both P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis yielded areas of 0.849 for tumor long-axis diameter, 0.578 for calcification, and 0.862 for their combination.

CONCLUSION

The study indicates lower calcification rates in intermediate-risk gastric GISTs and higher rates in other risk categories. Additionally, tumors of different sizes exhibit two distinct calcification patterns, suggesting possible differing mechanisms of calcification in tumors. Calcification in gastric GISTs ≤ 5 cm acts as a protective factor against higher malignancy risk, and when combined with tumor long-axis diameter, significantly enhances predictive accuracy over long-axis diameter alone.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Elderly Patients

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are prevalent in elderly patients. Endoscopic resection has become popular for treating small (≤5 cm) gastric GISTs. However, little is known about the outcomes of endoscopic resection in elderly patients.

Aim

To assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for small (≤5 cm) gastric GISTs in elderly patients (≥65 years old).

Methods

A total of 260 patients (265 lesions) with gastric GISTs treated via endoscopic resection from January 2011 to May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 65 patients were ≥65 years old (elderly group), and 195 patients were <65 years old (nonelderly group). Clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative complications, and tumor recurrence rates between the two age groups were compared.

Results

A total of 260 patients with primary small (≤5 cm) gastric GISTs were treated with endoscopic resection. The median ages of the elderly and nonelderly groups were 68 (range 65-83) years and 55 (range 32-64) years, respectively. Elderly patients showed a higher incidence of comorbidities compared with nonelderly patients (61.5% versus 32.3%s, respectively; p < 0.001). All elderly patients and 99.0% of nonelderly patients underwent en bloc resection; only two nonelderly patients received piecemeal resection. No significant differences were found regarding postoperative complications or tumor recurrence rates between the two groups.

Conclusions

Although elderly patients had more comorbidities than nonelderly patients, both groups had similar postoperative complications and recurrence rates. We suggest that endoscopic resection performed by experienced endoscopists is safe and effective for treating small (≤5 cm) gastric GISTs in elderly patients.