Choledocholithiasis--principles of diagnosis and management

Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage-based saline-injection ultrasound: an imaging technique for remnant stone detection after retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Background

The purpose of this retrospective study aimed to assess the accuracy of detection of remnant common bile duct (CBD) stones by injecting saline through endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) tubes under transabdominal ultrasound (US) guidance.

Method

Stone extraction and ENBD are regularly achieved through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with CBD stones. At 1–3  days thereafter, routine US studies were performed and repeated, using ENBD tubal saline injections (20–100  mL).

Results

A total of 302 patients underwent standard ERCP stone extractions in conjunction with occlusion cholangiograms, routine US testing, and ENBD-based saline-injection US exams. By occlusion cholangiogram, remnant stones were suspected in 31 (10.3%) patients in total of 302, and 26 (83.8%) were verified as true positives (sensitivity, 50.9%; specificity, 98.0%). Routine US studies proved suspicious in 13 (4.3%) patients in total of 302, and 12 (92.3%) were verified as true positives (sensitivity, 23.5%; specificity, 99.6%). Using ENBD-based saline-injection US, suspected stones were identified in 50 (16.6%) patients in total of 302, and 46 (92%) were verified as true positives (sensitivity, 90.1%; specificity, 98.4%). The sensitivity of ENBD-based saline-injection US significantly surpassed that of occlusion cholangiogram (p < 0.001) and routine US (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Detection of remnant CBD stones via ENBD-based saline-injection US is a valid, inexpensive, and repeatable means of patient screening that is non-invasive, radiation-free, and dynamically informative. This may help improve the accuracy of detecting remnant CBD stones after ERCP.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02394-8.

Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic and surgical approaches

Gallstone disease and complications from gallstones are a common clinical problem. The clinical presentation ranges between being asymptomatic and recurrent attacks of biliary pain requiring elective or emergency treatment. Bile duct stones are a frequent condition associated with cholelithiasis. Amidst the total cholecystectomies performed every year for cholelithiasis, the presence of bile duct stones is 5%-15%; another small percentage of these will develop common bile duct stones after intervention. To avoid serious complications that can occur in choledocholithiasis, these stones should be removed. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on the ideal management strategy to perform such. For a long time, a direct open surgical approach to the bile duct was the only unique approach. With the advent of advanced endoscopic, radiologic, and minimally invasive surgical techniques, however, therapeutic choices have increased in number, and the management of this pathological situation has become multidisciplinary. To date, there is agreement on preoperative management and the need to treat cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis, but a debate still exists on how to cure the two diseases at the same time. In the era of laparoscopy and mini-invasiveness, we can say that therapeutic approaches can be performed in two sessions or in one session. Comparison of these two approaches showed equivalent success rates, postoperative morbidity, stone clearance, mortality, conversion to other procedures, total surgery time, and failure rate, but the one-session treatment is characterized by a shorter hospital stay, and more cost benefits. The aim of this review article is to provide the reader with a general summary of gallbladder stone disease in association with the presence of common bile duct stones by discussing their epidemiology, clinical and diagnostic aspects, and possible treatments and their advantages and limitations.

Intraoperative Cholangiography Can Be Safely Omitted during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Study of 413 Consecutive Patients

Background and Aims:

The aim of the study was to show that laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) can be performed safely without intraoperative cholangiography (IOC).

Material and Methods:

We conducted a prospective study of 413 consecutive patients with symptomatic gallstone disease, who underwent LC. According to the preoperative clinical, laboratory and ultrasound criteria, 38 patients (9.2 %) were selected for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). All patients were followed postoperatively for symptoms and signs of common bile duct (CBD) stones.

Results:

Preoperative ERC allowed to make a diagnosis of choledocholithiasis in 22 (58 %) of the 38 selected patients. Stone clearance was achieved with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in all cases. Three patients (7.9 %) had an episode of mild self-limited pancreatitis after the procedure. Eight patients (1.9 %) of 413 required conversion from LC to open cholecystectomy. There were no CBD injuries and no death cases. Of the postoperative complications, 1.5 % were recorded during hospital stay. During the follow-up period, for at least 2 years after surgery, retained CBD stones were verified in 6 patients (1.5 %); however, the supposed rate of residual stones was 2.4 %.

Conclusions:

This study demonstrates that performance of selective preoperative ERC with ES when necessary, followed by LC, is an appropriate and safe approach to the treatment of patients with cholecystolithiasis and unsuspected choledocholithiasis. This approach allows to omit IOC and to perform LC safely without biliary duct injuries, ensuring low rate of retained CBD stones in the late follow-up period.

Various techniques for the surgical treatment of common bile duct stones: a meta review

Common bile duct stones (CBDSs) may occur in up to 3%–14.7% of all patients for whom cholecystectomy is preformed. Patients presenting with CBDS have symptoms including: biliary colic, jaundice, cholangitis, pancreatitis or may be asymptomatic. It is important to distinguish between primary and secondary stones, because the treatment approach varies. Stones found before, during, and after cholecystectomy had also differing treatments. Different methods have been used for the treatment of CBDS but the suitable therapy depends on conditions such as patient' satisfaction, number and size of stones, and the surgeons experience in laparoscopy. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with or without endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, laparoscopic CBD exploration (transcystic or transcholedochal), or laparotomy with CBD exploration (by T-tube, C-tube insertion, or primary closure) are the most commonly used methods managing CBDS. We will review the pathophysiology of CBDS, diagnosis, and different techniques of treatment with especial focus on the various surgical modalities.

Can computed tomography with coronal reconstruction improve the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Many technical developments of computed tomography (CT) made in recent years have improved imaging quality. However, the diagnostic efficacy of CT with coronal reconstruction for choledocholithiasis remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate if CT with coronal reconstruction can aid in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.

METHODS

Two hundred and sixty-six patients with clinically suspected choledocholithiasis undergoing abdominal CT before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were recruited. Among them, 163 patients confirmed with choledocholithiasis were divided into three groups: group 1, 92 patients undergoing CT using 5-mm thick sections with coronal reconstruction; group 2, 32 patients undergoing CT using 5-mm thick sections without coronal reconstruction; and group 3, 39 patients undergoing CT using 7-mm thick sections without coronal reconstruction. The diagnostic rate of CT for choledocholithiasis, the stone size and biochemical data among the three groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of CT in diagnosing choledocholithiasis were 77.3% and 72.8%. There was no significant difference of CT diagnostic rate among the three groups (75.0%, 81.2% and 79.5%, respectively). The diameter of common bile duct (CBD), size of CBD stones and white cell count showed significant differences between CT true-positive and false-negative cases in group 1 patients. The CT diagnostic rate was significantly lower in patients with choledocholithiasis of less than 5 mm than in patients with choledocholithiasis of 5 mm or more (56.5% vs 81.2%).

CONCLUSION

The coronal reconstruction of CT imaging did not increase its diagnostic efficacy on choledocholithiasis. The stone size affects the diagnostic rate of abdominal CT for detecting choledocholithiasis.