Antigen-specific CD4- and CD8-positive signatures in different phases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

Tuberculosis in a Migrant Population: Integrated Management of a Case through the Prevention Department and Hospital Services

Among numerous public health actions, the Prevention Departments of Local Health Authorities take charge of the migrant asylum-seeking population for health assessments, for the implementation of preventive activities, and for any consequent actions. This report describes two cases of tuberculosis in Belluno Province managed by a multidisciplinary team made up of healthcare workers that involved numerous diagnostic, clinical, and prophylactic implications, as well as an analysis of the epidemiological aspects related to the incidence of cases along the migration route. Although the cases occurred in a northeastern Italian territory, the management methods described here may represent good practices to share on this operational line, which can promote the strengthening of cooperation between Health Authorities and Emergency Reception Centers to correctly identify cases of active tuberculosis that may not have been initially screen-detected.

Comparing patterns of recent and remote Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection determined using the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus assay in a high TB burden setting

One quarter of the world's population is estimated to be infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Identifying recent TB infection (TBI) offers an avenue to targeted TB preventative therapy provision, and prevention to disease progression. However, detecting recent TBI remains challenging. The QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus assay (QFT-Plus) claims to have improved sensitivity in detecting recent TBI, by the addition of the TB2 antigen tube to the TB1 tube used in previous tests. TB2 detects CD8-mediated interferon gamma response, a potential marker of recent infection. We compared QFT-Plus TB1 and TB2 responses in individuals with recent and remote infection in high-burden settings. The Tuberculosis Reduction through Expanded Antiretroviral Treatment and TB Screening (TREATS) Project followed a cohort of adolescents and young people (AYP) aged 15-24 years in Zambia and South Africa to determine TBI incidence measured by QFT-Plus over 24 months. We categorised individuals with QTF-Plus positive result into recent and remote infection. We compared their TB1 and TB2 responses and the antigen tube differential [TB2-TB1], an indicator of CD8-activity, using logistic regression. At baseline, 3876 AYP, 1852/3876 (47.8%) were QFT-Plus positive whilst 2024/3876 (52.2%) QFT-Plus negative. Of the QFT-Plus baseline positives, 1069/1852 (57.7%) tested positive at both 12 and 24 months-remote infection. Of the QFT-Plus baseline negatives, 274/2024(13.3%) converted within a 12-month period- recent infection. TB1 and TB2 responses were higher in remote than recent infection. In recent infection, TB2 responses were greater than TB1 responses. The mean differential was 0.01 IU/ml in recent and -0.22 IU/ml in remote infection, (p = 0.145). The quantitative QFT-Plus results did not appear to reflect a marked distinction between recent and remote infection. Further analysis of the responses of infected individuals who developed disease is required to determine whether any signal in QFT-Plus results may predict progression to disease.

A Retrospective Study of Factors Contributing to the Performance of an Interferon-Gamma Release Assay Blood Test for Tuberculosis Infection

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global health concern. Accurate detection of latent TB infection is crucial for effective control and prevention. We aimed to assess the performance of an interferon-gamma release assay blood test (QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus [QFT-Plus]) in various clinical contexts and identify conditions that affect its results.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 31 000 QFT-Plus samples collected from 26 000 subjects at a tertiary hospital in South Korea over a 4-year period and compared the rates of positivity and indeterminate results across diverse clinical situations. We also analysed the contribution of the QuantiFERON TB2 tube to the test's sensitivity and determined optimal cutoff values for 3 hematologic parameters to distinguish false-negative results. These cutoff values were validated in a separate cohort of subjects with microbiologically confirmed subclinical TB.

RESULTS

Rates of QFT-Plus positivity and indeterminate results were disparate across diagnoses. The TB2 tube increased QFT-Plus sensitivity by 4.1% (95% CI, 1.1%-7.0%) in patients with subclinical TB. Absolute lymphocyte count ≤1.19 × 109/L, absolute neutrophil count ≥5.88 × 109/L, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥4.33 were effective criteria to discriminate false-negative QFT-Plus results. Application of the hematologic criteria, individually or combined with mitogen response <10 IU/mL, substantially improved performance in the main study cohort and the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the influence of clinical context and patient hematologic profiles on QFT-Plus results. To minimise neglected latent TB infections due to false-negative QFT-Plus results, serial retesting is advisable in patients with severe lymphopenia or neutrophilia, particularly when the mitogen response is <10 IU/mL.

Exploring the Potential of Exosomes as Biomarkers in Tuberculosis and Other Diseases

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and remains an important public health issue in developing countries worldwide. The existing methods and techniques available for the diagnosis of TB are based on combinations of laboratory (chemical and biological), radiological, and clinical tests. These methods are sophisticated and laborious and have limitations in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Clinical settings need improved diagnostic biomarkers to accurately detect biological changes due to pathogen invasion and pharmacological responses. Exosomes are membrane-bound vesicles and mediators of intercellular signaling processes that play a significant role in the pathogenesis of various diseases, such as tuberculosis, and can act as promising biomarkers for the monitoring of TB infection. Compared to conventional biomarkers, exosome-derived biomarkers are advantageous because they are easier to detect in different biofluids, are more sensitive and specific, and may be useful in tracking patients' reactions to therapy. This review provides insights into the types of biomarkers, methods of exosome isolation, and roles of the cargo (proteins) present in exosomes isolated from patients through omics studies, such as proteomics. These findings will aid in developing new prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers and could lead to the identification of new therapeutic targets in the clinical setting.

Prevalence and risk factors of M tuberculosis infection in young people across 14 communities in Zambia and South Africa

BACKGROUND

From 2018-2021 the TB Reduction through Expanded Antiretroviral Treatment and TB Screening (TREATS) project took place in 21 Zambian and South African communities. The TREATS Incidence of TB Infection Cohort Study was conducted in adolescents and young people (AYP), aged 15-24 years in 14 communities. We describe the baseline prevalence and risk factors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) infection among this cohort and explore the quantitative QFT-Plus interferon gamma (IFN-γ) responses.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A random sample of approximately 300 AYP per community were recruited and information on TB/HIV risk factors, TB symptoms and social mixing patterns collected. QuantiFERON TB Gold Plus assay (QFT-Plus) was used to detect M. tuberculosis infection, following manufacturer's instructions. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with infection. 5577 eligible AYP were invited to participate across both countries, with 4648 enrolled. QFT-Plus results were available for 4529: 2552(Zambia) and 1977(South Africa). Overall, 47.6% (2156/4529) AYP had positive QFT-Plus results, the prevalence of infection in South Africa being twice that in Zambia (64.7% (1280/1977) vs 34.3% (867/2552) p<0.001). Infection was associated with age, household contact with TB and alcohol in Zambia but showed no associations in South Africa. The antigen tube differential (TB2-TB1>0.6 IU/ml) of the assay at baseline showed no evidence of association with recent TB exposure.

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence of infection in AYP warrants urgent action to address TB control, especially in South Africa. Further research is required to delineate antigen tube responses of the QFT-Plus assay more precisely to fully realise the benefit of the additional TB2 tube in high TB/HIV burden settings.

Vitamin D supplementation to prevent tuberculosis infection in South African schoolchildren: multicenter phase 3 double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial (ViDiKids)

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether weekly oral supplementation with 10,000 IU vitamin D3 for 3 years reduces the risk of sensitization to M. tuberculosis in South African schoolchildren aged 6-11 years with negative QuantiFERON-tuberculosis (TB) Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) assay results at baseline.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial in 1682 children attending 23 primary schools in Cape Town. The primary outcome was a positive end-trial QFT-Plus result, analyzed using a mixed effects logistic regression model with the school of attendance included as a random effect.

RESULTS

829 vs. 853 QFT-Plus-negative children were randomized to receive vitamin D3 vs. placebo, respectively. Mean end-study 25(OH)D concentrations in participants randomized to vitamin D vs. placebo were 104.3 vs 64.7 nmol/l, respectively (95% confidence interval for difference, 37.6 to 41.9 nmol/l). A total of 76/667 (11.4%) participants allocated to vitamin D vs. 89/687 (13.0%) participants allocated to placebo tested QFT-Plus positive at 3-year follow-up (adjusted odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.19, P = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

Weekly oral supplementation with 10,000 IU vitamin D3 for 3 years elevated serum 25(OH)D concentrations among QFT-Plus-negative Cape Town schoolchildren but did not reduce their risk of QFT-Plus conversion.

Advancing personalized medicine for tuberculosis through the application of immune profiling

While early and precise diagnosis is the key to eliminating tuberculosis (TB), conventional methods using culture conversion or sputum smear microscopy have failed to meet demand. This is especially true in high-epidemic developing countries and during pandemic-associated social restrictions. Suboptimal biomarkers have restricted the improvement of TB management and eradication strategies. Therefore, the research and development of new affordable and accessible methods are required. Following the emergence of many high-throughput quantification TB studies, immunomics has the advantages of directly targeting responsive immune molecules and significantly simplifying workloads. In particular, immune profiling has been demonstrated to be a versatile tool that potentially unlocks many options for application in TB management. Herein, we review the current approaches for TB control with regard to the potentials and limitations of immunomics. Multiple directions are also proposed to hopefully unleash immunomics' potential in TB research, not least in revealing representative immune biomarkers to correctly diagnose TB. The immune profiles of patients can be valuable covariates for model-informed precision dosing-based treatment monitoring, prediction of outcome, and the optimal dose prediction of anti-TB drugs.

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube assays for detecting latent tuberculosis infection in Thai healthcare workers

Detecting latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is important, especially in high-risk populations including healthcare workers (HCWs). QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is a new version of the interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) to replace the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube (QFT-GIT). However, data on the use of QFT-Plus for LTBI detection in high TB-burden countries are limited. This study was conducted in a TB-endemic setting in Thailand. HCWs were enrolled in the study and underwent both tests during the annual health screening. The testing results were compared and the concordance was determined. Of 102 HCWs, 11 (10.78%) were positive according to both tests, and 15 (14.71%) were positive according to QFT-Plus. The overall agreement between assays was 96.08%, with Cohen's kappa coefficient (k) at 0.82. All four discordant results occurred with QFT-GIT negative and QFT-Plus positive. The comparison between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus based on each antigen tube (TB1 or TB2) exhibited similar concordance with 99.02% and 95.10% agreement, respectively. The intra-comparison between TB1 and TB2 of QFT-Plus also showed good concordance at 96.08%. Among this group of HCWs, the LTBI prevalence of any positive results in both tests was low. Overall, the study showed good agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT (k = 0.82) with a minimal difference, suggesting similar assay performance to that mainly carried out in TB-low incidence countries. The results support the use of QFT-Plus for detecting LTBI in a format similar to QFT-GIT.

Factors Influencing False-Negative Results of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) in Active Tuberculosis and the Desirability of Resetting Cutoffs for Different Populations: A Retrospective Study

Objectives The value of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) in the diagnosis of TB varies by population, comorbidities, and other factors. In this study, we aimed to investigate factors that influence false-negative results of QFT-GIT test in the diagnosis of TB as well as the impact of different cutoffs on the diagnostic value. Methods A total of 3562 patients who underwent QFT-GIT tests at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital were enrolled retrospectively between May 2016 and May 2017. False-negative and false-positive results were analyzed using different clinical stratifications. The optimal cutoff values were established under different clinical conditions. Results Positive QFT-GIT results greatly shortened the time taken to diagnose smear-negative TB. The factors of age, smear and culture results, site of TB, comorbidity with tumors, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, and CD4/CD8 ratio were significantly correlated with false-negative QFT-GIT results (p < 0.05). Personalized cutoff values were established according to different influencing factors. The results showed high consistency between the smear-negative and total populations. Conclusion QFT-GIT can facilitate the early diagnosis of smear-negative TB. The diagnostic performance of the QFT-GIT test in the diagnosis of active TB was shown to be affected by many clinical factors. Personalized cutoff values may have superior value in the identification of active tuberculosis under different conditions.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and T-SPOT.TB in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis in febrile patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the accuracy of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing active tuberculosis (ATB) in febrile patients, to explore influencing factors of positive results and to verify the potential value of QFT-Plus in the identification of ATB and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI).

METHODS

A total of 240 febrile patients with ATB (n = 80) and non-ATB (n = 160) were recruited to assess the accuracy of QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of positive results.

RESULTS

The proportion of indeterminate results (ITRS) in QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB were 3.3% and 0%, respectively. The consistency between the results of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB was substantial. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB was 0.792 and 0.849 (p = 0.070), respectively. The sensitivity of differentiating ATB from non-ATB was 92.2% in QFT-Plus versus 95.0% in T-SPOT.TB. The influencing factors of T-SPOT.TB positive result were male (odds ratio (OR) = 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-4.26, p = 0.006), evidence of previous TB (OR 11.36, 95% CI 4.62-27.94, p < 0.001), while male (OR = 3.17, 95% CI 1.73-5.84, p < 0.001), evidence of previous TB (OR = 7.58, 95% CI 3.60-15.98, p <0.001), and use of immunosuppressant (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.260.94, p = 0.030) were influencing factors for QFT-Plus positive result. There was no significant difference in QFT-Plus in differentiating ATB from LTBI in febrile patients.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference between QFT-Plus and T-SPOT.TB for diagnosing ATB in febrile patients. QFT-Plus is prone to ITRS. The influencing factors including males, evidence of the previous TB, and use of immunosuppressant should be considered when interpreting positive results.

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Assay in Patients With Latent vs. Active Tuberculosis in a Low Incidence Setting: Level of IFN-γ, CD4/CD8 Responses, and Release of IL-2, IP-10, and MIG

Objectives

We analyzed the results of the QuantiFERON Glod Plus assay (QFT) and cytokine patterns associated with active tuberculosis (ATB) among patients with positive QFT.

Methods

A total of 195 patients are QFT-positive, among which 24 had an ATB and 171 had a latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) secretion was analyzed relative to interleukin-2 (IL-2), IFN-γ inducible protein or CXCL-10 (IP-10), and monokine induced by IFN-γ or CXCL-9 (MIG) secretion, and then compared between two sets of peptide antigens [tube 1 - cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4+) T cell stimulation; tube 2 - CD4+/CD8+ T cell response].

Results

Higher IFN-γ responses were measured in the ATB group (p = 0.0089). The results showed that there was a lower ratio of tube 1/tube 2 IFN-γ concentrations in the ATB group (p = 0.0009), and a median [interquartile ranges (IQR)] difference between the two sets at −0.82 IU/ml (−1.67 to 0.18) vs. −0.07 IU/ml (−0.035 to 0.11, p &lt; 0.0001) in the ATB group compared to the LTBI group, respectively. In addition, patients with low ratios of IL-2/IFN-γ, IP-10/IFN-γ, and MIG/IFN-γ were much more likely to have ATB.

Conclusion

High levels of IFN-γ secretion, preferential IFN-γ response in tube 2, and lower secretion of IL-2, IP-10, and MIG release relative to IFN-γ secretion were more likely observed in subjects with ATB. These features of T cell response may be helpful in low prevalence settings to suspect ATB in patients tested positive for IFN-γ release assays (IGRA).

Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and QuantiFERON-TB Gold-Plus in the Diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infections in Immunocompromised Patients: a Real-World Study

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is an emerging QuantiFERON test after QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) for tuberculosis infection detection; it is an IFN-γ release assay. We compared QFTPlus, which has an additional TB antigen 2 (TB2) tube to induce cell-mediated (CD8⁺ T cell) immune responses, with QFT-GIT. We conducted this study to assess the agreement of the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays in immunocompromised patients in a clinical setting. A total of 278 immunocompromised patients and 175 immunocompetent patients from different departments were continuously enrolled from August 2020 to March 2021, and each patient underwent both tests. Correlations between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays showed good agreement (κ value = 0.859). Patients receiving long-term immunosuppressant therapy had the lowest concordance between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays; 9 out of 11 positive latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) cases were diagnosed by the QFT-Plus assay, implying that QFT-Plus may detect more LTBI than QFT-GIT does in these patients. Indeterminate results were associated with lower lymphocyte, CD4⁺ T cell, and CD8⁺ T cell absolute counts, and with lower CD4/CD8 ratios. In conclusion, we found that the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays had high agreement not only in immunocompetent patients but also in immunocompromised patients. QFT-Plus may detect more LTBI than QFT-GIT in patients receiving long-term immunosuppressant therapy. Thresholds were established for lymphocyte absolute counts of >1.15 × 10⁹ cells, and for CD4⁺ T cell absolute counts of >467.7 × 10⁶ to 478.5 × 10⁶ cells, which may lessen the incidence of indeterminate results.

IMPORTANCE This study evaluated the performance of QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus in the diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection in immunocompromised patients and found that QFT-Plus may detect more LTBI than QFT-GIT does in patients receiving long-term immunosuppressant therapy. We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because it highlights the different diagnostic accuracies of QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus in different subpopulations of immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients. Selecting a test with better performance, particularly in patients with a high risk of developing active TB, may assist the health sector in better managing TB. Furthermore, we believe that this study will be of significance to the diagnosis of LTBI.

Identification of Recent Tuberculosis Exposure Using QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus, a Multicenter Study

We investigated whether the difference of antigen tube 2 (TB2) minus antigen tube 1 (TB1) (TB2-TB1) of the QuantiFERON-TB gold plus test, which has been postulated as a surrogate for the CD8⁺ T-cell response, could be useful in identifying recent tuberculosis (TB) exposure. We looked at the interferon gamma (IFN-γ) responses and differences in TB2 and TB1 tubes for 686 adults with QFT-plus positive test results. These results were compared among groups with high (368 TB contacts), low (229 patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases [IMID]), and indeterminate (89 asylum seekers or people from abroad [ASPFA]) risks of recent TB exposure. A TB2-TB1 value >0.6 IU·ml^-1 was deemed to indicate a true difference between tubes. In the whole cohort, 13.6%, 10.9%, and 11.2% of cases had a TB2>TB1 result in the contact, IMID, and ASPFA groups, respectively (P = 0.591). The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for an association between a TB2-TB1 result of >0.6 IU·ml^-1 and risk of recent exposure versus contacts were 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 1.61) for the IMID group and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.49 to 1.52) for the ASPFA group. In TB contact subgroups, 11.4%, 15.4%, and 17.7% with close, frequent, and sporadic contact had a TB2>TB1 result (P = 0.362). The aORs versus the close subgroup were 1.29 (95% CI, 0.63 to 2.62) for the frequent subgroup and 1.55 (95% CI, 0.67 to 3.60) for the sporadic subgroup. A TB2-TB1 difference of >0.6 IU·ml^-1 was not associated with increased risk of recent TB exposure, which puts into question the clinical potential as a proxy marker for recently acquired TB infection. IMPORTANCE Contact tuberculosis tracing is essential to identify recently infected people, who therefore merit preventive treatment. However, there are no diagnostic tests that can determine whether the infection is a result of a recent exposure or not. It has been suggested that by using the QuantiFERON-TB gold plus, an interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assay, a difference in IFN-γ production between the two antigen tubes (TB2 minus TB1) of >0.6 IU·ml^-1 could serve as a proxy marker for recent infection. In this large multinational study, infected individuals could not be classified according to the risk of recent exposure based on differences in IFN-γ in TB1 and TB2 tubes that were higher than 0.6 IU·ml^-1. QuantiFERON-TB gold plus is not able to distinguish between recent and remotely acquired tuberculosis infection, and it should not be used for that purpose in contact tuberculosis tracing.

Retrospective Performance Analyses of over Two Million U.S. QuantiFERON Blood Sample Results

Both the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) tests are interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assays (IGRAs) intended to detect in vitro cell-mediated immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed performance data for both the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus test systems from over 2 million samples. QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT testing was performed as specified in the respective package inserts at 23 Quest Diagnostics sites. Blood specimens were collected from individuals in all 50 states from November 2018 through December 2019. Retrospective analyses compared the proportion of positive, indeterminate, and conversion/reversion results. The overall proportion of QFT-positive results was 7% for both the QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT. The proportion of positive results was highest for QFT-GIT (7.5%) followed by the heparin 1-tube QFT-Plus (7.2%); a lower proportion of positives was observed with the 4-tube (all four QFT tubes were used in blood collection) QFT-Plus (6.0%). The proportions of indeterminate results for the 1-tube (heparin-only tube collection) and 4-tube QFT-Plus methods were less than 1% and 4%, respectively. This study indicates a higher proportion of positive results for M. tuberculosis than data from other studies. Additionally, the proportion of indeterminate QFT results were markedly lower when the sample was transported in one lithium-heparin tube instead of direct inoculation into 4 QFT-Plus tubes at the site of blood collection. IMPORTANCE In this study, we retrospectively analyzed results from both the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus test systems from over 2 million blood specimens. The variables analyzed were (i) QFT positivity rates among various U.S. populations, (ii) indeterminate rates among various types of blood draws and how often an indeterminate result was resolved within 30 days after the initial draw, and (iii) the association of TB1 and TB2 antigen tubes with IGRA reversion and conversion events from serial QFT testing. This is, to our knowledge, the largest QFT study representing patients from an extensive geographic coverage across the United States and U.S. territories.

Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube tests for patients with active and latent tuberculosis: A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance and clinical value of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) tests in patients with active tuberculosis (TB) or latent TB infection (LTBI).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 140 patients, including 63 with active TB and 77 with LTBI, between March 2017 and October 2018. QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus were performed simultaneously in all subjects.

RESULTS

QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT test results showed significant agreement, in both active TB and LTBI patients, in terms of the interferon-γ concentration and interpretation result. QFT-Plus had higher sensitivity than QFT-GIT for predicting active TB (82.5% vs. 77.8%) and showed fewer false-negative and indeterminate results in both active TB and LTBI patients due to its "TB2 tube". The QFT-Plus TB2-TB1 value was higher in the active TB group than in the LTBI group. The QFT-Plus TB1-Nil and TB2-Nil values were useful in predicting remote LTBI, rather than recent LTBI.

CONCLUSIONS

QFT-Plus showed good agreement with QFT-GIT in both active TB and LTBI patients, and higher sensitivity for predicting active TB than QFT-GIT. The QFT-Plus TB2 tube results, which reflect CD8⁺ T cell immunity, may improve predictive accuracy and detection of the immune response associated with active TB and LTBI.

Longitudinal Mycobacterium tuberculosis specific interferon-γ responses in Ethiopian HIV-negative women during pregnancy and post-partum

Pregnancy may influence cellular immune responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We investigated M. tuberculosis-specific interferon-γ responses in women followed longitudinally during pregnancy and postpartum. Interferon-γ levels (stimulated by M. tuberculosis antigens [TB1 and TB2] and mitogen included in the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus assay) were measured in blood from pregnant HIV-negative women identified from a prospective cohort at Ethiopian antenatal care clinics. Longitudinal comparisons included women without active tuberculosis (TB) with M. tuberculosis-triggered interferon-γ responses of ≥ 0.20 IU/ml, sampled on two and/or three occasions (1st/2nd trimester, 3rd trimester, and 9 months postpartum). Among 2,093 women in the source cohort, 363 met inclusion criteria for longitudinal comparisons of M. tuberculosis-stimulated interferon-γ responses. Median M. tuberculosis-triggered interferon-γ concentrations were higher at 3rd than those at the 1st/2nd trimester (in 38 women with samples available from these time points; TB1: 2.8 versus 1.6 IU/ml, P = 0.005; TB2: 3.3 versus 2.8 IU/ml, P = 0.03) and postpartum (in 49 women with samples available from these time points; TB1: 3.1 versus 2.2 IU/ml, P = 0.01; TB2: 3.1 versus 2.3 IU/ml, P = 0.03). In contrast, mitogen-stimulated interferon-γ levels were lower at 3rd than those at 1st/2nd trimester (in 32 women with samples available from these time points: 21.0 versus 34.9 IU/ml, P = 0.02). Results were similar in 22 women sampled on all 3 occasions. In HIV-negative women, M. tuberculosis-stimulated interferon-γ responses were higher during the 3rd trimester than those at earlier stages of pregnancy and postpartum, despite decreased mitogen-triggered responses. These findings suggest increased M. tuberculosis-specific cellular responses due to dynamic changes of latent TB infection during pregnancy.

MS-Based HLA-II Peptidomics Combined With Multiomics Will Aid the Development of Future Immunotherapies

Immunotherapies have emerged to treat diseases by selectively modulating a patient's immune response. Although the roles of T and B cells in adaptive immunity have been well studied, it remains difficult to select targets for immunotherapeutic strategies. Because human leukocyte antigen class II (HLA-II) peptides activate CD4+ T cells and regulate B cell activation, proliferation, and differentiation, these peptide antigens represent a class of potential immunotherapy targets and biomarkers. To better understand the molecular basis of how HLA-II antigen presentation is involved in disease progression and treatment, systematic HLA-II peptidomics combined with multiomic analyses of diverse cell types in healthy and diseased states is required. For this reason, MS-based innovations that facilitate investigations into the interplay between disease pathologies and the presentation of HLA-II peptides to CD4+ T cells will aid in the development of patient-focused immunotherapies.

Evaluation of CD8+ response in QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus as a marker of recent infection

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) is essential for the elimination of TB. Preventive therapy could be limited to those with recent TB contact. QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus), a new Interferon-γ release assay, includes a new antigen tube (TB2), which elicits CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell responses.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate CD8⁺ T-cell response as a marker of recent TB infection.

DESIGN

We retrospectively studied 1165 patients who were screened for LTBI. Patients were divided according to history of recent exposure to TB (contact with a confirmed index case in the previous year). CD8⁺ T-cell activity was measured as the difference between QFT-Plus tubes (TB2-TB1) using two cut-offs (>0.35 IU/mL and >0.60 IU/mL).

RESULTS

CD8⁺ T-cell activity was significantly higher in the exposed group for both cut-offs (96 - 13% vs 36 - 5% patients - OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.13-2.52 for >0.35 IU/mL and 77 vs 28 patients - OR 1.72 95% CI 1.10-2.70 for >0.60 IU/mL). CD8⁺ T-cell activity also showed an association with positive sputum smear of the index case and higher exposure time.

CONCLUSION

CD8⁺ T-cell activity as measured with TB2-TB1 shows a significant association with recent exposure to TB, especially in patients with higher exposure and may prove to be a useful tool in identifying patients with recent LTBI.

Evaluation of the performance of QuantiFERON®-TB Gold plus test in active tuberculosis patients

The aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and the possible factors affecting the sensitivity of the QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) assay in culture-positive active TB (Tuberculosis) patients, to investigate the possible causes of negative and indeterminate results in active TB patients, and to compare the QFT-Plus results of active TB patients and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) cases. The QFT-Plus assay was performed in 46 active TB patients and 64 LTBI. The sensitivity of the test was found as 79.5% in all culture-positive patients, 72.7% in the immunocompromised patients, and 86.4% in the non-immunocompromised patients. Compared to active TB, individuals with LTBI had a lower T-cell response and lower IFN-ɣ concentrations. It was determined that the immunocompromisation reduced the sensitivity of the test and the secreted IFN-ɣ concentrations and increased the indeterminate results in patients with active TB. There was no difference in secreted IFN-ɣ concentrations between M. tuberculosis clones, but higher IFN-ɣ concentrations in patients infected with M. tuberculosis strains compared to patients infected with zoonotic strains. Compared with active TB, response to “only to TB2” was significantly higher in LTBI. In conclusion, it was concluded that TB2 tube increased sensitivity in LTBI but may not contribute to sensitivity in active TB.

CD4 response of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus for positive consistency of latent tuberculosis infection in patients on dialysis

A significantly negative reversion in the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube (QFT-GIT) test is reported in patients on dialysis, which makes the results unreliable. The CD4 and CD8 responses of the QFT-Gold plus (QFT-Plus) may have better positive consistency, but this needs to be investigated. We enrolled dialysis patients with baseline positive QFT-GIT₀ results and conducted two rounds of follow-up paired QFT-GIT_1&2 and QFT-Plus_1&2 tests at an interval of 6 months. The positive consistency, concordance, and discordance of the QFT results were analyzed. A total of 236 patients on dialysis were screened, and 73 participants with positive QFT-GIT₀ results were enrolled. The baseline QFT-GIT₀ response was higher in the 1st QFT-Plus₁(+) group than in the QFT-Plus₁(-) group, but insignificantly different between the 1st QFT-GIT₁(+) and QFT-GIT₁(-) groups. The two assays had good correlation when concurrently tested. Fifty-three subjects completed a second round of the QFT-GIT₂ and QFT-Plus₂. Persistent positivity was higher with the QFT-Plus₂ (81.8%) than with the QFT-GIT₂ (58.8%, p = 0.040). The QFT-GIT₁ and QFT-Plus₁ CD4 responses were higher in patients with persistent positivity than in those with negative reversion, whereas the difference of the QFT-Plus TB1 and TB2 data, representative of the CD8 response, were similar between positive persistence and negative reversion. In conclusion, the QFT-Plus provides more reliable positive consistency than does the QFT-GIT. The CD4 interferon-γ response might play a role in maintaining positivity of LTBI.

Epidemic and pandemic viral infections: impact on tuberculosis and the lung: A consensus by the World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid), Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN), and members of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Study Group for Mycobacterial Infections (ESGMYC)

Major epidemics, including some that qualify as pandemics, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), HIV, influenza A (H1N1)pdm/09 and most recently COVID-19, affect the lung. Tuberculosis (TB) remains the top infectious disease killer, but apart from syndemic TB/HIV little is known regarding the interaction of viral epidemics and pandemics with TB. The aim of this consensus-based document is to describe the effects of viral infections resulting in epidemics and pandemics that affect the lung (MERS, SARS, HIV, influenza A (H1N1)pdm/09 and COVID-19) and their interactions with TB. A search of the scientific literature was performed. A writing committee of international experts including the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Public Health Emergency (ECDC PHE) team, the World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid), the Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN), and members of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Mycobacterial Infections (ESGMYC) was established. Consensus was achieved after multiple rounds of revisions between the writing committee and a larger expert group. A Delphi process involving the core group of authors (excluding the ECDC PHE team) identified the areas requiring review/consensus, followed by a second round to refine the definitive consensus elements. The epidemiology and immunology of these viral infections and their interactions with TB are discussed with implications for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of airborne infections (infection control, viral containment and workplace safety). This consensus document represents a rapid and comprehensive summary on what is known on the topic.

Interferon-Gamma Release Assay Testing in Children Younger Than 2 Years in a US-Based Health System

BACKGROUND

Use of interferon-gamma releasing assays (IGRAs) in children <2 years old may derive many of the same advantages, which have led to preference over tuberculin skin test (TST) in older children, but data are limited. Since 2011, we have tested children <2 years old with Quantiferon-TB Gold/Gold Plus (QFT)) in select clinical scenarios at Denver Health, a health system encompassing a TB clinic, refugee and immigrant screening and primary care.

METHODS

We identified patients <2 years old tested with QFT between February, 2011 and August, 2019. The primary outcome measure was incident cases of TB among tested patients. Test results and in vitro characteristics were analyzed, as were demographic, epidemiologic and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

We analyzed 116 QFTs ordered in children age 7-23 months. Two were positive, 3 indeterminate, 3 failed/refused phlebotomy and the remainder (93%) were negative. Mitogen tube results were robust. Thirteen patients were TST-positive: 11 were QFT-negative, 1 QFT-positive and 1 failed phlebotomy. Eight patients received some form of TB medication, including 4 QFT-negative patients who were treated for active TB or latent TB infection based on positive TST or clinical findings. Among QFT-negative patients, including 6 TST-positive, not treated for active TB or latent TB infection, no TB disease has been identified over a median follow-up time of 2.96 years.

CONCLUSIONS

IGRA use was not limited by barriers of phlebotomy, indeterminate result or gamma-interferon production. The risk of missing an infected but IGRA-negative patient can be reduced by treatment of select patients at higher risk. Current recommendations against IGRA use in children <2 years old could be amended to allow careful introduction, particularly among well-appearing BCG-vaccinated patients.

Fourth-Generation QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus: What Is the Evidence?

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is the latest generation of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) to receive approval from the U.S. FDA, replacing its predecessor, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT). The novelty of QFT-Plus is that it elicits a response from CD8 T cells, in addition to CD4 T cells, thus collecting a broader response from T-cell subsets than QFT-GIT. It was developed with the aim to improve the detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), especially among recently exposed contacts, immunocompromised hosts, and young children. In this minireview, we summarize the performance of QFT-Plus compared with that of QFT-GIT among active tuberculosis (TB) patients (a surrogate for LTBI patients), high-risk populations, and low-risk individuals based on recent publications. Studies comparing QFT-Plus to QFT-GIT currently do not support the superior performance of QFT-Plus in individuals with active TB and LTBI. The difference in sensitivity between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT in active TB patients was not significant in nearly all studies and ranged from -4.0 to 2.0%. Among high-risk groups, the agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT was 89.9 to 96.0% (kappa coefficient range, 0.80 to 0.91). The specificity in the low-risk population was slightly lower for QFT-Plus than for QFT-GIT, with the difference ranging from -7.4 to 0%. Further studies are needed to accurately evaluate the sensitivity of QFT-Plus in immunocompromised hosts and children. In addition, further evidence is required to validate a modified interpretation of QFT-Plus for the identification of false-positive results in low-risk health care workers.

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus combined with HBHA-Induced IFN-γ release assay improves the accuracy of identifying tuberculosis disease status

OBJECTIVE

QFT-Plus's newly added antigen elicited a specific CD8 T-cell response, which is closely related to active TB (ATB), and the IGRA based on Heparin-binding haemagglutinin (HBHA-IGRA) is a promising tool in latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) diagnosis. The objective of our study is to evaluate whether the combination of QFT-Plus and HBHA-IGRA can improve the diagnosis accuracy of ATB and LTBI.

METHODS

135 healthcare workers (HCWs) and 57 patients with active pulmonary TB in a Chinese TB Hospital were recruited, HCWs underwent screening for LTBI using the QFT-Plus assay. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the distribution of peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets in active TB patients with positive culture result. Then, the patients with ATB, individuals with LTBI and healthy TB-uninfected controls (HC) were tested by QFT-Plus and HBHA-IGRA respectively, and the efficiency of distinguishing LTBI from ATB by QFT-Plus and HBHA-IGRA were evaluated by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

QFT-Plus TB2-TB1 which was positively correlated with CD8 T-cell response (r = 0.731, P < 0.001) in peripheral blood was significantly higher in ATB than LTBI and HC (median 0.47 IU/mL versus 0.02 IU/mL and 0.00 IU/mL, respectively; both P < 0.0001). While the HBHA-induced IFN-γ response did not differ between ATB and HC (median 12.12 pg/mL versus 10.95 pg/mL; P = 0.463), but was significantly higher in the LTBI (median 69.67 pg/mL; both P < 0.0001). The ROC area under the curve (AUC) for identifying ATB and LTBI was 0.769 (95% CI: 0.652-0.886; P = 0.0001) for QFT-Plus TB2-TB1, and 0.886 (95% CI:0.791-0.982; P＜0.0001) for HBHA-IGRA. After combining the HBHA-IGRA with QFT-Plus results, the accuracy of identifying ATB and LTBI was improved to 85.7% from 74.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

HBHA-based IGRA better differentiates between LTBI and ATB compared to QFT-Plus CD8 T-cell response. In addition, combining HBHA-IGRA and QFT-Plus improves the accuracy of identifying tuberculosis disease status.

Comparison of the change in QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube results after preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection

Background

We investigated changes in the interferon-γ levels before and after treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) using QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assays. The objective was to assess whether QFT-Plus could serve as a biomarker of LTBI treatment response.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 44 individuals whose baseline QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus showed positive results at a tertiary referral center in South Korea between March 2017 and March 2018. The results of the QFT-Plus assay were defined as positive if either or both of the antigen tubes (TB1 and/or TB2) were positive. After LTBI treatment, both tests were repeated.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 47.6 years. The QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays revealed positive results in 42/44 (95.5%) and 41/44 (93.2%) participants after LTBI treatment, showing overall agreement of 93.2%, with a Cohen’s kappa value of 0.37 (fair agreement). The differences between pre- and post-LTBI treatment interferon-γ levels were measured using the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays. No significant differences were noted among the 3 values: the median difference in interferon-γ value with QFT-GIT, QFT-Plus TB1, and QFT-Plus TB2 was 0.211 IU/mL (IQR, −0.337–3.347), 0.025 IU/mL (IQR, −0.338–1.368), and 0.180 IU/mL (IQR, −0.490–2.278), respectively (P = 0.401).

Conclusion

The change in interferon-γ levels before and after LTBI treatment measured using the QFT-Plus assay showed a similar trend to that of the QFT-GIT assay. Considering that the QFT-GIT assay is not a useful biomarker of LTBI treatment response, QFT-Plus also appears not to be useful for this purpose.

Accuracy of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Test for Diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection in Children

Compared to its predecessor QuantiFERON-TB Gold In Tube (QFT-IT), QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) contains an additional antigen tube (TB2), stimulating both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells. The ability to discriminate CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ responses is suggested to be useful in differentiating stages of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. While QFT-Plus has already been evaluated in adults, there are not enough data in children evaluated for suspected active tuberculosis (TB) or latent TB infection (LTBI). A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among children aged 0 to 17 years who were evaluated for suspected active TB or screened for LTBI. All children underwent QFT-Plus and further clinical, radiological, and/or microbiological analyses according to clinical scenario. Of the 198 children enrolled, 43 (21.7%) were tested because of suspicion of active TB. A total of 12/43 (27.9%) were diagnosed with active TB, and among these, 10/12 (83.3%) had a positive QFT-Plus assay. Of the 155 children screened for LTBI, 18 (11.6%) had a positive QFT-Plus, and 5 (2.5%) had an indeterminate result. TB1 and TB2 quantitative responses were not able to discriminate active disease from latent infection. The percent agreement between TB1 and TB2 was 100%. QFT-Plus assay showed good sensitivity for active TB and was particularly useful for the evaluation of children with suspected LTBI, giving a low rate of indeterminate results in this group. More studies are needed to properly evaluate QFT-Plus ability in discriminating active disease from latent infection.

Accuracy of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Test for Diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection in Children

Compared to its predecessor QuantiFERON-TB Gold In Tube (QFT-IT), QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) contains an additional antigen tube (TB2), stimulating both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells. The ability to discriminate CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ responses is suggested to be useful in differentiating stages of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. While QFT-Plus has already been evaluated in adults, there are not enough data in children evaluated for suspected active tuberculosis (TB) or latent TB infection (LTBI). A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among children aged 0 to 17 years who were evaluated for suspected active TB or screened for LTBI. All children underwent QFT-Plus and further clinical, radiological, and/or microbiological analyses according to clinical scenario. Of the 198 children enrolled, 43 (21.7%) were tested because of suspicion of active TB. A total of 12/43 (27.9%) were diagnosed with active TB, and among these, 10/12 (83.3%) had a positive QFT-Plus assay. Of the 155 children screened for LTBI, 18 (11.6%) had a positive QFT-Plus, and 5 (2.5%) had an indeterminate result. TB1 and TB2 quantitative responses were not able to discriminate active disease from latent infection. The percent agreement between TB1 and TB2 was 100%. QFT-Plus assay showed good sensitivity for active TB and was particularly useful for the evaluation of children with suspected LTBI, giving a low rate of indeterminate results in this group. More studies are needed to properly evaluate QFT-Plus ability in discriminating active disease from latent infection.

Effect of HIV-infection on QuantiFERON-plus accuracy in patients with active tuberculosis and latent infection

OBJECTIVE

HIV-infection increases the risk to progress to active-tuberculosis (TB). Detection of latent TB infection (LTBI) is needed to eventually propose preventive-therapy and reduce TB reservoir. QuantiFERON-TB Plus (QFT-Plus)-test identifies LTBI. Currently, only two studies on QFT-Plus accuracy in HIV-infected-population are available in high TB-endemic-countries. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the effect of HIV-infection on QFT-Plus accuracy to detect LTBI in a low TB-endemic-country.

METHODS

We enrolled 465 participants, among the 167 HIV-infected-persons: 32 with active-TB (HIV-TB), 45 remote-LTBI (HIV-LTBI) and 90 at low M. tuberculosis (Mtb)-infection risk. Among the 298 HIV-uninfected-persons: 170 with active-TB, 76 recent-LTBI, 34 remote-LTBI and 18 with low Mtb-infection risk.

RESULTS

QFT-Plus sensitivity was similar in TB regardless of HIV-status. CD4-count did not influence the distribution of IFN-γ values in HIV-TB and HIV-LTBI. Moreover HIV-LTBI and HIV-uninfected remote LTBI had a similar proportion of results in the uncertain range (IFNγ ≥0.2 ≤ 0.7 IU/ml) differently from those LTBI-persons reporting recent-exposure (p = 0.016). Cytometry results demonstrated that CD8-response was similar in HIV-infected- and -uninfected-persons whereas CD4-response was impaired in HIV-infected-persons (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-infection does not affect QFT-Plus response in active-TB, whereas the time of exposure influences the proportion of uncertain-results in LTBI.

Evaluation of cytokine levels using QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus in patients with active tuberculosis

OBJECTIVES

A recently released new QuantiFERON (QFT) product, QFT TB Gold plus (QFT-plus), is optimized for both CD4 and CD8 responses and reported to have higher sensitivity compared to the former QFT-3 G. Previously, using supernatants of QFT-3 G, we and others have demonstrated that cytokines other than IFN-γ may be useful in diagnosing tuberculosis. The present study aimed to identify cytokines that are useful for accurately diagnosing active tuberculosis by using QFT-plus and compared the data to those with QFT-3 G.

METHODS

Eighty-three active tuberculosis patients and 70 healthy control subjects who were examined by QFT at Tokyo National Hospital from June 2017 to July 2018 were enrolled. QFT-3 G and QFT-plus were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. At the same time, blood cell culture supernatants were collected and assayed for their cytokine levels using R&D Systems Luminex Assay and MAGPIX System. The levels of cytokines were compared between different antigen-containing tubes (3 G Ag, TB1 and TB2 tubes), as well as between the patients and the control subjects. ROC curves were drawn, and the AUCs were calculated.

RESULTS

Five cytokines, i.e., IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IP-10 and MIP-1β, produced by human blood cells in three independent tubes containing different tuberculosis antigens were higher in the 3 G Ag tube compared to both the TB1 and TB2 tubes. Further, when the TB1 and TB2 tubes were compared, TB2 showed greater production of only PDGF-BB, and less production of IL-6 and TNF-α. For diagnosing active tuberculosis, the levels of IP-10 were superior to the level of IFN-γ based on showing a larger AUC for ROC curves in our present study setting. Finally, the levels of IFN-γ, IL-1RA, IL-2, IP-10, MCP-1 and MIP-1β were distinctly different between the active tuberculosis patients and healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, there was no cytokine that was higher in the tubes of QFT-plus compared to the tube of QFT-3 G, suggesting inferiority of QFT-plus antigens to 3 G Ag in terms of elicitation of cytokine production. Our results also suggest the usefulness of cytokines that showed a significant difference between the active tuberculosis patients and the healthy controls-namely, IFN-γ, IL-1RA, IL-2, IP-10, MCP-1 and MIP-1β-for diagnosing tuberculosis, but the roles of these cytokines in the pathogenesis of tuberculosis need to be elucidated (UMIN000035253).

Can Interferon-γ Release Assays Be Useful for Monitoring the Response to Anti-tuberculosis Treatment?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The number of studies which evaluated interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) results after anti-tuberculosis (TB) treatment has been rapidly increasing. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential use of IGRAs (QFT-GIT, T-SPOT.TB, QFT-Plus) in assessing the response to anti-TB treatment. We searched all studies in English language published from 1 October 2011 to 18 November 2018 in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Our search included the term "tuberculosis treatment AND interferon-γ release assay". We included studies evaluating the performance of commercial IGRAs (including QFT-GIT, T-SPOT.TB and QFT-Plus) before and after the anti-TB treatment. We performed subgroup analysis based on the age (children, adults), type of TB (active, latent, active and latent, and contacts exposed to MDR defined as MDR LTBI), type of IGRAs (QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB), and follow-up interval (2, 3, 4, 6, 9 months). Of the 18 included studies, 12 used QFT-GIT for assessment of IGRA performance after therapy, 1 used T-SPOT.TB, and 3 used both QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB. Since then, only two studies have assessed the QFT-Plus performance during therapy. According to the results of the meta-analysis, the pooled rate of positive IGRAs (QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB) following anti-TB therapy was estimated at 76% [95% CI 70-81%] and no difference was found compared to the pooled positive rate of IGRAs before initiation of therapy which was 76% [95% CI 60-89%]. The subgroup analysis showed that the pooled rate of positive IGRAs (QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB) after anti-TB therapy was significantly higher in monitoring active TB subjects [80% (95% CI 74-88%)] than LTBI [71% (95% CI 70-81%)]. Available data are now sufficient to suggest that monitoring changes in the IGRAs (QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB) response during anti-TB treatment may have limited use in evaluating the effectiveness of treatment, while the monitoring changes in QFT-Plus during anti-tubercular treatment are recommended to determine treatment efficacy or for treatment monitoring. Further research is needed to establish the efficacy of this new assay as marker on a larger scale for treatment monitoring.

Risk of Occupational Latent Tuberculosis Infection among Health Personnel Measured by Interferon-Gamma Release Assays in Low Incidence Countries-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Healthcare workers (HCWs) have increased risk for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and tuberculosis (TB) disease due to their occupational exposure. For some years now, interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) have replaced the tuberculin skin test for the diagnosis of LTBI in many countries. This review examined the occupational risk of LTBI in HCWs with IGRA testing in low incidence countries. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from 2005 onwards provide data regarding the prevalence of LTBI in HCWs. In addition, the pooled effect estimates were calculated for individual regions and occupational groups. 57 studies with 31,431 HCWs from four regions and a total of 25 countries were analysed. The prevalence of LTBI varied from 0.9 to 85.5%. The pooled estimation found the lowest prevalence of LTBI for North American and West Pacific countries (<5%), and the highest prevalence for Eastern Mediterranean countries (19.4%). An increased risk for LTBI was found only for administrative employees. Studies on the occupational risk of LTBI continue to show increased prevalence of HCWs, even in low-incidence countries. Good quality studies will continue to be needed to describe occupational exposure.

Immune Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring of Tuberculosis: Current Developments and Future Prospects

Tuberculosis (TB) treatment monitoring is paramount to clinical decision-making and the host biomarkers appears to play a significant role. The currently available diagnostic technology for TB detection is inadequate. Although GeneXpert detects total DNA present in the sample regardless live or dead bacilli present in clinical samples, all the commercial tests available thus far have low sensitivity. Humoral responses against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) antigens are generally low, which precludes the use of serological tests for TB diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring. Mtb-specific CD4⁺ T cells correlate with Mtb antigen/bacilli burden and hence might serve as good biomarkers for monitoring treatment progress. Omics-based techniques are capable of providing a more holistic picture for disease mechanisms and are more accurate in predicting TB disease outcomes. The current review aims to discuss some of the recent advances on TB biomarkers, particularly host biomarkers that have the potential to diagnose and differentiate active TB and LTBI as well as their use in disease prognosis and treatment monitoring.

Comparing QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus with Other Tests To Diagnose Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection

The fourth-generation QuantiFERON test for tuberculosis infection, QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) has replaced the earlier version, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT). A clinical need exists for information about agreement between QFT-Plus and other tests. We conducted this study to assess agreement of test results for QFT-Plus with those of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT), T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT), and the tuberculin skin test (TST). Persons at high risk of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and/or progression to tuberculosis (TB) disease were enrolled at the 10 sites of the Tuberculosis Epidemiologic Studies Consortium from October 2016 through May 2017; each participant received all four tests. Cohen's kappa (κ) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared qualitative and quantitative results of QFT-Plus with the other tests. Test results for 506 participants showed 94% agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT, with 19% positive and 75% negative results. When the tests disagreed, it was most often in the direction of QFT-GIT negative/QFT-Plus positive. QFT-Plus had similar concordance as QFT-GIT with TST (77% and 77%, respectively) and T-SPOT (92% and 91%, respectively). The study showed high agreement between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus in a direct comparison. Both tests had similar agreement with TST and T-SPOT.

Comparison of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube interferon-γ release assays: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is a new generation of QuantiFERON assay that differs from QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT). The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the new FDA-approved QFT-Plus interferon (IFN)-γ release assays (IGRAs) with the QFT-GIT version of this assay.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We searched all studies published in English in electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.

RESULTS

The positive proportion of positive results by QFT-Plus was higher than QFT-GIT in cured tuberculosis (TB) cases (82% vs. 73%). The two tests showed a substantial agreement and the majority of the latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) subjects responded concomitantly to both QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT. However, QFT-Plus showed a stronger association with surrogate measures of TB suspects than QFT-GIT. The QFT-Plus test demonstrated a higher sensitivity than QFT-GIT in the older adults. The sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR- and DOR overall were 94% (95% CI 89-97), 96% (95% CI 94-98), 24.4 (95% CI 15-39), 0.05 (95% CI 0.03-0.11) and 414 (95% CI 251-685), respectively. The area under summary ROC curve was 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-0.99).

CONCLUSION

QFT-Plus performs equivalently to the QFT-GIT for detection of patients at risk for LTBI; however, QFT-Plus test had higher sensitivity than the QFT-GIT test, with similar specificity among the older participants. Higher IFN-γ release in TB2 compared to TB1 might be due to recent LTBI.

QuantiFERON TB Gold Plus for the diagnosis of tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Estimated 2017 tuberculosis (TB) incidence is 10 million and mainly depends on the reservoir of individuals with latent TB infection (LTBI). Quantiferon^Ⓡ-TB Gold in-Tube (QFT-GIT) is one of the tests used for LTBI detection. Since 2015 a new version, Quantiferon^Ⓡ-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is available.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy for TB of QFT-Plus compared to QFT-GIT.

METHODS

PubMed and Scopus were used to detect records related to predefined strings from 2015 to 2018. Full text articles dealing with the sensitivity and/or specificity of the QFT-Plus vs. QFT-GIT for active-TB and LTBI detection were analyzed. Scientific quality and risk of bias were assessed using QADAS-2.

RESULTS

We selected 15 articles. Studies were mainly observational and cross-sectional, performed in 8 countries. Sample size differed in the TB group (27 to 164) compared to LTBI group (29 to 1031). Pooled sensitivity of QFT-Plus for active-TB was 0.94 (0.91 and 0.95 for TB1 and TB2, respectively), whereas pooled specificity for healthy status was 0.96. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for LTBI was 0.91 and 0.95, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We show that QFT-Plus is more sensitive compared to QFT-GIT for detecting M. tuberculosis infection, mainly due to TB2 responses.

Metallic Fe-Au Barcode Nanowires as a Simultaneous T Cell Capturing and Cytokine Sensing Platform for Immunoassay at the Single-Cell Level

Barcode nanowires (BNWs) composed of multiple layered segments of different materials are attractive to bioengineering field due to their characteristics that allow the adjustment of physicochemical properties and conjugation with two or more types of biomolecules to facilitate multiple tasks. Here, we report a metallic Fe (iron)-Au (gold) BNW-based platform for capturing CD8 T cells and the interferon-γ (γ) they secrete, both of which play key roles in controlling infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, at the single-cell level. We also describe an efficient approach for conjugating distinct antibodies, which recognize different epitopes to appropriate materials. The platform achieved detection even with 4.45-35.6 μg mL^-1 of BNWs. The T cell capture efficiency was close to 100% and the detection limit for interferon-γ was 460 pg mL^-1. This work presents a potential guideline for the design of single-cell immunoassay platforms for eliminating diagnostic errors by unambiguously identifying disease-relevant immune mediators.

CD8 response measured by QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and tuberculosis disease status

BACKGROUND

Clinical application of the CD8 response as measured by the newer interferon gamma release assay, QuantiFERON-TB Gold-Plus (QFT-Plus), remains to be investigated.

METHOD

We performed this prospective study and recruited active TB patients, contacts with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and contacts without LTBI in two centres in northern Taiwan in 2017. Subjects were tested with both QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) and QFT-Plus. LTBI was defined by positive result by QFT-GIT and exclusion of active TB.

RESULTS

A total of 336 participants (118 uninfected contacts, 105 LTBI, 113 active TB) were included. The concordance rate of QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus was high (n = 300, 89.3%). The kappa value was 0.811 among contacts and 0.708 among active TB. While TB1 and TB2 quantitative responses were not different between active TB and LTBI (TB1: 1.74 ± 2.73 IU/ml vs. 2.03 ± 2.28 IU/ml, p = 0.403; TB2: 2.21 ± 3.09 IU/ml vs. 2.15 ± 2.40 IU/ml, p = 0.867), CD8 response was higher in active TB than LTBI (0.47 ± 1.53 IU/ml vs. -0.06 ± 1.47 IU/ml, p = 0.011). Culture-confirmed TB had a higher CD8 response compared with LTBI (0.63 ± 1.74 IU/ml vs. -0.05 ± 1.47 IU/ml, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated specific CD8 responses among uninfected contacts, LTBI as well as active TB.

Specificity of QuantiFERON-TB Plus, a New-Generation Interferon Gamma Release Assay

Interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) are important tools in identifying prior tuberculosis exposure. The new-generation QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) assay, recently approved for use in the United States, differs from the current-generation QFT Gold-In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assay with the addition of a second antigen tube that also contains novel CD8⁺ T-cell-stimulating peptides. The QFT-Plus assay has increased sensitivity in immunocompromised populations, and we sought to assess the specificity of QFT-Plus compared to that of QFT-GIT in low-risk individuals. We enrolled adults without tuberculosis risk factors, including a subgroup with pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) disease due to Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) or Mycobacterium abscessus. The primary outcome measures included specificity, interassay concordance, and agreement between the QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT assays. Of 262 participants enrolled, 51 had pulmonary NTM. The median age was 39 years (age range, 18 to 78 years); 73% were female. Among the 262 individuals who were enrolled, 5 (1.9%) individuals had positive QFT-Plus results, and 3 of these individuals also had positive QFT-GIT results. The two individuals with discordant results (QFT-Plus positive/QFT-GIT negative) had only one tube positive in the QFT-Plus assay. The overall specificity of QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT was 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95.6, 99.4%) and 98.9% (95% CI, 96.7, 99.8%), respectively. The QFT-Plus specificity was similar in both the NTM (98.0% [95% CI, 89.4, 99.9%]) and non-NTM (98.1% [95% CI, 95.2, 99.5%]) groups. QFT-Plus has a high specificity, similar to that of the QFT-GIT assay, including in patients with pulmonary MAC or M. abscessus disease.

Can we predict tuberculosis cure? What tools are available?

Antibiotic treatment of tuberculosis takes ≥6 months, putting a major burden on patients and health systems in large parts of the world. Treatment beyond 2 months is needed to prevent tuberculosis relapse by clearing remaining, drug-tolerant Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli. However, the majority of patients treated for only 2-3 months will cure without relapse and do not need prolonged treatment. Assays that can identify these patients at an early stage of treatment may significantly help reduce the treatment burden, while a test to identify those patients who will fail treatment may help target host-directed therapies.In this review we summarise the state of the art with regard to discovery of biomarkers that predict relapse-free cure for pulmonary tuberculosis. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanning to measure pulmonary inflammation enhances our understanding of "cure". Several microbiological and immunological markers seem promising; however, they still need a formal validation. In parallel, new research strategies are needed to generate reliable tests.

Comparative Evaluation of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus in Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Immunocompromised Patients

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is a new-generation QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assay which has two antigen-coated tubes called TB1, which contains long peptides derived from ESAT-6 and CFP-10, and TB2, which contains the same components as TB1 and additional short peptides which potentially stimulate CD8⁺ T cells through the presentation of major histocompatibility complex class I. This is the first study to compare QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT for use in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among immunocompromised patients in the Republic of Korea. Among 317 consecutive patients who underwent screening for LTBI before solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor treatment, LTBI was identified in 92 (29.0%) and 88 (27.8%) patients by QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus, respectively. The rate of concordance between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus was 93.7% (κ value, 0.860), and the indeterminate rate (3.2%) was similar between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus. Of 20 (6.3%) samples with discordant results, 11 (55.0%) and 7 (35.0%) were positive by QFT-GIT alone and QFT-Plus alone, respectively, and 2 (15.0%) were indeterminate by each assay. The interferon gamma level in samples with discordant results ranged from 0.39 to 1.10 IU/ml, except for one sample, in which the gamma interferon level was 2.97 IU/ml only in TB2. Conclusively, there was a high degree of agreement between the results of QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus for the screening of immunocompromised patients for LTBI. The reactivity in TB2 contributed substantially to the difference between QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus, particularly in solid organ transplant candidates. The significance of the discrete responses in TB1 and TB2 of QFT-Plus needs to be explored further by means of an immunological and clinical approach in different patient groups and clinical settings.

QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus Is a More Sensitive Screening Tool than QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube for Latent Tuberculosis Infection among Older Adults in Long-Term Care Facilities

We investigated the prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among the residents in seven long-term care facilities (LTCFs) located in different regions of Taiwan and compared the performance of two interferon gamma release assays, i.e., QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) for screening LTBI. We also assessed the diagnostic performance against a composite reference standard (subjects with persistent-positive, transient-positive, and negative results from QFTs during reproducibility analysis were classified as definite, possible, and not LTBI, respectively). Two hundred forty-four residents were enrolled, and 229 subjects were included in the analysis. The median age was 80 years (range, 60 to 102 years old), and 117 (51.1%) were male. Among them, 66 (28.8%) and 74 (32.3%) subjects had positive results from QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus, respectively, and the results for 215 (93.9%) subjects showed agreement. Using the composite reference standard, 66 (28.8%), 11 (4.8%), and 152 (66.4%) were classified as definite, possible, and not LTBI, respectively. For definite LTBI, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of QFT-GIT were 89.4%, 95.7%, 89.4%, and 95.7%, respectively, and those for QFT-Plus were 100.0%, 95.1%, 89.2%, and 100.0%, respectively. The sensitivity of QFT-GIT decreased gradually with patient age. Compared to QFT-GIT, QFT-Plus displayed significantly higher sensitivity (100.0% versus 89.4%, P = 0.013) and similar specificity (95.1% versus 95.7%). In conclusion, a high prevalence of LTBI was found among elders in LTCFs in Taiwan. The new QFT-Plus test demonstrated a higher sensitivity than QFT-GIT in the older adults in LTCFs.

Incipient and Subclinical Tuberculosis: a Clinical Review of Early Stages and Progression of Infection

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading infectious cause of mortality worldwide, due in part to a limited understanding of its clinical pathogenic spectrum of infection and disease. Historically, scientific research, diagnostic testing, and drug treatment have focused on addressing one of two disease states: latent TB infection or active TB disease. Recent research has clearly demonstrated that human TB infection, from latent infection to active disease, exists within a continuous spectrum of metabolic bacterial activity and antagonistic immunological responses. This revised understanding leads us to propose two additional clinical states: incipient and subclinical TB. The recognition of incipient and subclinical TB, which helps divide latent and active TB along the clinical disease spectrum, provides opportunities for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to prevent progression to active TB disease and transmission of TB bacilli. In this report, we review the current understanding of the pathogenesis, immunology, clinical epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of both incipient and subclinical TB, two emerging clinical states of an ancient bacterium.

Comparison of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube Interferon Gamma Release Assays in Patients at Risk for Tuberculosis and in Health Care Workers

The QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus; Qiagen, Germantown, MD) interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) received FDA clearance in 2017 and will replace the prior version of the assay, the QFT-Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT). Here, we compared performances of the QFT-Plus assay and the QFT-GIT version in a diverse patient population, including patients undergoing evaluation for or follow-up of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI; n = 39) or active TB infection (n = 3), and in health care workers (HCWs; n = 119) at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). Compared to the QFT-GIT, the QFT-Plus assay showed 91.2% (31/34) positive, 98.4% (124/126) negative, and 96.6% (156/161) overall qualitative agreement among the 161 enrolled subjects, with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.91 (excellent interrater agreement). Among the 28 patients diagnosed with LTBI at the time of enrollment, the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays agreed in 24 (85.7%) patients; in all four discordant patients, the positivity of the QFT-GIT or QFT-Plus IGRA was associated with low-level interferon gamma (IFN-γ) reactivity, ranging from 0.36 IU/ml to 0.66 IU/ml. Additionally, we document a high degree of correlation between IFN-γ levels in the QFT-GIT TB antigen tube and each of the two QFT-Plus TB antigen tubes, as well as between the QFT-Plus TB1 and TB2 tubes (Pearson's correlation coefficients [R] > 0.95). Overall, we show comparable results between the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays in our study population composed of subjects presenting with a diverse spectrum of TB infections. Our findings suggest that the necessary transition to the QFT-Plus assay will be associated with a minimal difference in assay performance characteristics.

Latent tuberculosis infection: Opportunities and challenges

Diagnosing and treating latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) is recognized by the World Health Organization as an important strategy to accelerate the decline in global TB and achieve TB elimination. Even among low-TB burden countries that have achieved high rates of detection and successful treatment for active TB, a number of barriers have prevented implementing or expanding LTBI treatment programmes. Of those infected with TB, relatively few will develop active disease and the current diagnostic tests have a low predictive value. LTBI treatment using isoniazid (INH) has low completion rates due to the long duration of therapy and poor tolerability. Both patients and physicians often perceive the risk of toxicity to be greater than the risk of reactivation TB. As a result, LTBI treatment has had a limited or negligible role outside of countries with high resources and low burden of disease. New tools have emerged including the interferon-gamma release assays that more accurately diagnose LTBI, particularly in people vaccinated with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). Shorter, better tolerated treatment using rifamycins are proving safe and effective alternatives to INH. While still imperfect, TB prevention using these new diagnostic and treatment tools appear cost effective in modelling studies in the United States and have the potential to improve TB prevention efforts globally. Continued research to understand the host-organism interactions within the spectrum of LTBI is needed to develop better tools. Until then, overcoming the barriers and optimizing our current tools is essential for progressing toward TB elimination.

Evaluation of IP-10 in Quantiferon-Plus as biomarker for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection

The QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is a new test for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) diagnosis, in which has been added a new tube containing shorter peptides stimulating CD8 T-cells and CD4-stimulating-peptides. Measurement of alternative biomarkers to Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) in QFT-Plus may improve its sensitivity. Interferon-γ inducible protein 10 (IP-10), has been proposed as a tuberculosis (TB) biomarker. We aimed to evaluate the IP-10 accuracy in QFT-Plus for LTBI diagnosis. QFT-Plus was performed in 36 active TB, 31 LTBI and 16 healthy donors (HD). IP-10 was detected by ELISA. IP-10 is increased in TB1 and TB2 tubes in subjects with active TB and LTBI compared to HD. A ROC analysis comparing active TB and HD was performed and a cut-off of 1174 pg/mL for TB1 and 928.8 pg/mL for TB2 identified active TB with 86% sensitivity (Se) and 94% specificity (Sp). Moreover, increased IP-10 in response to TB1 was found in subjects with LTBI compared to those with active TB. A cut-off point of ≥16,108 pg/mL was chosen to maximize the test performance. However, the test predicted LTBI only with 58% Se and 61% Sp. These results suggest that IP-10 is an alternative biomarker to IFN-γ in the QFT-Plus format.

Stratification by interferon-γ release assay level predicts risk of incident TB

INTRODUCTION

Targeted testing and treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI) are priorities on the global health agenda, but LTBI management remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the QuantiFERON TB-Gold (QFT) test for incident TB, focusing on the interferon (IFN)-γ level, when applied in routine practice in a low TB incidence setting.

METHODS

In this large population-based prospective cohort, we linked QFT results in Norway (1 January 2009-30 June 2014) with national registry data (Norwegian Surveillance System for Infectious Diseases, Norwegian Prescription Database, Norwegian Patient Registry and Statistics Norway) to assess the prognostic value of QFT for incident TB. Participants were followed until 30 June 2016. We used restricted cubic splines to model non-linear relationships between IFN-γ levels and TB, and applied these findings to a competing risk model.

RESULTS

The prospective analyses included 50 389 QFT results from 44 875 individuals, of whom 257 developed TB. Overall, 22% (n=9878) of QFT results were positive. TB risk increased with the IFN-γ level until a plateau level, above which further increase was not associated with additional prognostic information. The HRs for TB were 8.8 (95% CI 4.7 to 16.5), 19.2 (95% CI 11.6 to 31.6) and 31.3 (95% CI 19.8 to 49.5) times higher with IFN-γ levels of 0.35 to <1.00, 1.00 to <4.00 and >4.00 IU/mL, respectively, compared with negative tests (<0.35 IU/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistently, QFT demonstrates increased risk of incident TB with rising IFN-γ concentrations, indicating that IFN-γ levels may be used to guide targeted treatment of LTBI.

Performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus for detection of latent tuberculosis infection in pregnant women living in a tuberculosis- and HIV-endemic setting

We evaluated the performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus), which includes two Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen formulations (TB1 and TB2), for detection of latent tuberculosis infection during pregnancy. Eight-hundred-twenty-nine Ethiopian pregnant women (5.9% HIV-positive) were tested with QFT-Plus, with bacteriological sputum analysis performed for women with clinically suspected tuberculosis and HIV-positive women irrespective of clinical presentation. QFT-Plus read-out was categorized according to the conventional cut-off (0.35 IU/ml) for both antigen formulations. In addition, we analysed the distribution of QFT-Plus results within a borderline zone (0.20–0.70 IU/ml), and interferon-γ response in relation to HIV infection and gestational age. Two-hundred-seventy-seven women (33%) were QFT-Plus-positive (HIV-positive 16/49 [33%]; HIV-negative 261/780 [33%]). There was a strong agreement between the two antigen formulations (κ = 0.92), with discordant results in 29 cases (3.5%). Whereas discordant QFT-Plus results were rare in pregnancy, several results with both TB1 and TB2 within the borderline range were observed (11/49 [22%] vs. 43/780 [5.5%] in HIV-positive and HIV-negative women, respectively; p<0.0001). HIV-positive women had lower absolute interferon-γ levels (TB1: 0.47 vs. 2.16 IU/ml; p<0.001, TB2: 0.49 vs. 2.24 IU/ml, p<0.001, considering results ≥0.20 IU/ml) compared to HIV-negative women. QFT-Plus-positive women who submitted samples at later stages of pregnancy had lower mitogen- (p<0.001) but higher TB-antigen-specific (p = 0.031 for TB1, p = 0.061 for TB2) interferon-γ response. Considering their lower capacity to produce TB-specific interferon-γ, a lower cut-off level for defining QFT-Plus-positivity may be considered in HIV-positive pregnant women.