Prolonged tamoxifen treatment increases relapse-free survival for patients with primary breast cancer expressing high levels of VEGF

Network Pharmacology-Based Dissection of the Comprehensive Molecular Mechanisms of the Herbal Prescription FDY003 Against Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

Estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (ERPBC) is the commonest subtype of breast cancer, with a high prevalence, incidence, and mortality. Herbal drugs are increasingly being used to treat ERPBC, although their mechanisms of action are not fully understood. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to analyze the therapeutic properties of FDY003, a herbal anti-ERPBC prescription, using a network pharmacology approach. FDY003 decreased the viability of human ERPBC cells and sensitized them to tamoxifen, an endocrine drug that is widely used in the treatment of ERPBC. The network pharmacology analysis revealed 18 pharmacologically active components in FDY003 that may interact with and regulate 66 therapeutic targets. The enriched gene ontology terms for the FDY003 targets were associated with the modulation of cell survival and death, cell proliferation and growth arrest, and estrogen-associated cellular processes. Analysis of the pathway enrichment of the targets showed that FDY003 may target a variety of ERPBC-associated pathways, including the PIK3-Akt, focal adhesion, MAPK, and estrogen pathways. Overall, these data provide a comprehensive mechanistic insight into the anti-ERPBC activity of FDY003.

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) correlates with long-term survival in patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC): a study from the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer (TOC) Consortium

OBJECTIVE

The impact of angiogenesis on long-term survival of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients remains unclear. This study investigated whether angiogenic markers correlated with 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) in a large cohort of matched advanced HGSOC tissue samples.

METHODS

Tumor samples from 124 primary HGSOC patients were retrospectively collected within the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer ( http://www.toc-network.de ). All patients were in advanced stages (FIGO stage III-IV). No patient had received anti-angiogenesis therapy. The cohort contains 62 long-term survivors and 62 controls matched by age and post-surgical tumor residuals. Long-term survivors were defined as patients with no relapse within 5 years after the end of first-line chemotherapy. Controls were patients who suffered from first relapse within 6-36 months after primary treatment. Samples were assessed for immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) A and VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2). Expression profiles of VEGFA and VEGFR2 were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Significant correlation between VEGFA and VEGFR2 expression was observed (p < 0.0001, Spearman coefficient 0.347). A high expression of VEGFR2 (VEGFR2^high) was found more frequently in long-term survivors (77.4%, 48/62) than in controls (51.6%, 30/62, p = 0.001), independent of FIGO stage and VEGFA expression in multivariate analysis (p = 0.005). Also, VEGFR2^high was found the most frequently in women with PFS ≥ 10 years (p = 0.001) among all 124 patients. However, no significant association was detected between VEGFA expression and 5-year PFS (p = 0.075).

CONCLUSIONS

VEGFR2 overexpression significantly correlated with long-term PFS in HGSOC patients, independent of age, FIGO stage, tumor residual and VEGFA expression.

Hormone Use is Associated with Lymphovascular Invasion in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Risk of developing breast cancer increases with short breastfeeding and the use of hormones. The prognosis of breast cancer is better if the tumours are hormone receptor positive. Since breast feeding affects estrogen and progesterone receptors, we wanted to investigate how such reproductive factors as breastfeeding and the use of hormones interact with known prognostic markers and specific tumour characteristics in women with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 250 women treated for breast cancer from a larger cohort completed a questionnaire on breastfeeding, number and age at births and use of hormones. A logistic regression analysis was made to search for connections between known prognostic markers on the one hand (type of cancer, grade, tumor size, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, lymphovascular invasion and DNA-ploidy) and reproductive data, breastfeeding, and hormone use on the other.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Hormone use, but not breastfeeding, was significantly associated, also on multivariate analysis, with the prognostic variable lymphovascular invasion, connected to a worse prognosis. No other hormone use or breast feeding correlations with prognostic variables were found.

Proteomics profiling identify CAPS as a potential predictive marker of tamoxifen resistance in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer

Background

Despite the success of tamoxifen since its introduction, about one-third of patients with estrogen (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PgR) - positive breast cancer (BC) do not benefit from therapy. Here, we aim to identify molecular mechanisms and protein biomarkers involved in tamoxifen resistance.

Results

Using iTRAQ and Immobilized pH gradient-isoelectric focusing (IPG-IEF) mass spectrometry based proteomics we compared tumors from 12 patients with early relapses (<2 years) and 12 responsive to therapy (relapse-free > 7 years). A panel of 13 proteins (TCEAL4, AZGP1, S100A10, ALDH6A1, AHNAK, FBP1, S100A4, HSP90AB1, PDXK, GFPT1, RAB21, MX1, CAPS) from the 3101 identified proteins, potentially separate relapse from non-relapse BC patients. The proteins in the panel are involved in processes such as calcium (Ca²⁺) signaling, metabolism, epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), metastasis and invasion. Validation of the highest expressed proteins in the relapse group identify high tumor levels of CAPS as predictive of tamoxifen response in a patient cohort receiving tamoxifen as only adjuvant therapy.

Conclusions

This data implicate CAPS in tamoxifen resistance and as a potential predictive marker.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12014-015-9080-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Retinoic acid receptor alpha is associated with tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer

About one-third of oestrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen relapse. Here we identify the nuclear receptor retinoic acid receptor alpha as a marker of tamoxifen resistance. Using quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics, we show that retinoic acid receptor alpha protein networks and levels differ in a tamoxifen-sensitive (MCF7) and a tamoxifen-resistant (LCC2) cell line. High intratumoural retinoic acid receptor alpha protein levels also correlate with reduced relapse-free survival in oestrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen solely. A similar retinoic acid receptor alpha expression pattern is seen in a comparable independent patient cohort. An oestrogen receptor alpha and retinoic acid receptor alpha ligand screening reveals that tamoxifen-resistant LCC2 cells have increased sensitivity to retinoic acid receptor alpha ligands and are less sensitive to oestrogen receptor alpha ligands compared with MCF7 cells. Our data indicate that retinoic acid receptor alpha may be a novel therapeutic target and a predictive factor for oestrogen receptor alpha-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen.

Celecoxib alleviates tamoxifen-instigated angiogenic effects by ROS-dependent VEGF/VEGFR2 autocrine signaling

BACKGROUND

Tamoxifen (TAM) is widely used in the chemotherapy of breast cancer and as a preventive agent against recurrence after surgery. However, extended TAM administration for breast cancer induces increased VEGF levels in patients, promoting new blood vessel formation and thereby limiting its efficacy. Celecoxib (CXB), a selective COX-2 inhibitor, suppresses VEGF gene expression by targeting the VEGF promoter responsible for its inhibitory effect. For this study, we had selected CXB as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug in combination with TAM for suppressing VEGF expression and simultaneously reducing doses of both the drugs.

METHODS

The effects of CXB combined with TAM were examined in two human breast cancer cell lines in culture, MCF7 and MDA-MB-231. Assays of proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, metastasis, cell cycle distribution, and receptor signaling were performed.

RESULTS

Here, we elucidated how the combination of TAM and CXB at nontoxic doses exerts anti-angiogenic effects by specifically targeting VEGF/VEGFR2 autocrine signaling through ROS generation. At the molecular level, TAM-CXB suppresses VHL-mediated HIF-1α activation, responsible for expression of COX-2, MMP-2 and VEGF. Besides low VEGF levels, TAM-CXB also suppresses VEGFR2 expression, confirmed through quantifying secreted VEGF levels, luciferase and RT-PCR studies. Interestingly, we observed that TAM-CXB was effective in blocking VEGFR2 promoter induced expression and further 2 fold decrease in VEGF levels was observed in combination than TAM alone in both cell lines. Secondly, TAM-CXB regulated VEGFR2 inhibits Src expression, responsible for tumor progression and metastasis. FACS and in vivo enzymatic studies showed significant increase in the reactive oxygen species upon TAM-CXB treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, our experimental results indicate that this additive combination shows promising outcome in anti-metastatic and apoptotic studies. In a line, our preclinical studies evidenced that this additive combination of TAM and CXB is a potential drug candidate for treatment of breast tumors expressing high levels of VEGF and VEGFR2. This ingenious combination might be a better tailored clinical regimen than TAM alone for breast cancer treatment.

Overlooking evolution: a systematic analysis of cancer relapse and therapeutic resistance research

Cancer therapy selects for cancer cells resistant to treatment, a process that is fundamentally evolutionary. To what extent, however, is the evolutionary perspective employed in research on therapeutic resistance and relapse? We analyzed 6,228 papers on therapeutic resistance and/or relapse in cancers and found that the use of evolution terms in abstracts has remained at about 1% since the 1980s. However, detailed coding of 22 recent papers revealed a higher proportion of papers using evolutionary methods or evolutionary theory, although this number is still less than 10%. Despite the fact that relapse and therapeutic resistance is essentially an evolutionary process, it appears that this framework has not permeated research. This represents an unrealized opportunity for advances in research on therapeutic resistance.

Angiogenesis-associated sequence variants relative to breast cancer recurrence and survival

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer (BrCA) risk stratification using clinico-pathological biomarkers helps improve disease prognosis prediction. However, disease recurrence rates remain unfavorable and individualized clinical management strategies are needed. Consequently, we evaluated the influence of 14 sequence variants detected in IL-10, TGF-β1, VEGF, and their associated receptors as effective predictors of BrCA clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Tumor DNA samples collected from 441 BrCA patients were genotyped using TaqMan-PCR. Most selected targets alter cytokine serum/plasma levels or signaling pathways. Relationships between genetic profiles and recurrence as well as disease-related mortality were evaluated using cumulative incidence curves and competing risk regression models.

RESULTS

The VEGF(-2578)C allele was associated with a 1.3- to 1.6-fold increase in BrCA recurrence (HR(trend) = 1.28; 95% CI = 0.96-1.72) and disease-related mortality (HR(trend) = 1.56; 95% CI = 0.93-2.56). Although this marker was marginally significant relative to BrCA outcomes, there were substantial gains in the 5- and 8-year predictive accuracy compared to standard prognostic indicators. Among ER(+)/PR(+) status patients, there was a significant impact of the VEGF(-2578)CC genotype on disease recurrence and predictive accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest inheritance of the VEGF(-2578)C allele could serve as an independent prognostic indicator of BrCA prognosis. The VEGF(-2578) marker may have clinical implications among a subset of ER(+)/PR(+) patients with an aggressive phenotype. Because the VEGF(-2578)C allele is linked to high VEGF expression, this cytokine is a potential prognostic and targeted clinical management tool.