Screening and surveillance in hereditary gastrointestinal cancers: Recommendations from the European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO) expert discussion at the 20th European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)/World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, June 2018

Selection of Germline Genetic Testing Panels in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To guide use of multigene panels for germline genetic testing for patients with cancer.

METHODS

An ASCO Expert Panel convened to develop recommendations on the basis of a systematic review of guidelines, consensus statements, and studies of germline and somatic genetic testing.

RESULTS

Fifty-two guidelines and consensus statements met eligibility criteria for the primary search; 14 studies were identified for Clinical Question 4.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients should have a family history taken and recorded that includes details of cancers in first- and second-degree relatives and the patient's ethnicity. When more than one gene is relevant based on personal and/or family history, multigene panel testing should be offered. When considering what genes to include in the panel, the minimal panel should include the more strongly recommended genes from Table 1 and may include those less strongly recommended. A broader panel may be ordered when the potential benefits are clearly identified, and the potential harms from uncertain results should be mitigated. Patients who meet criteria for germline genetic testing should be offered germline testing regardless of results from tumor testing. Patients who would not normally be offered germline genetic testing based on personal and/or family history criteria but who have a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant identified by tumor testing in a gene listed in Table 2 under the outlined circumstances should be offered germline testing.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/molecular-testing-and-biomarkers-guidelines.

Colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk and high-risk individuals: A systematic review

AIMS

This review aims to summarize the different colorectal cancer guidelines for average-risk and high-risk individuals from various countries.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search regarding guidelines, consensus recommendations, or position statements about colorectal cancer screening published within the last 10 years (1st January 2012 to 27th August 2022), was performed at EBSCOhost, JSTOR, PubMed, ProQuest, SAGE, and ScienceDirect.

RESULTS

A total of 18 guidelines were included in this review. Most guidelines recommended screening between 45 and 75 years for average-risk individuals. Recommendations regarding colorectal cancer screening in high-risk individuals were more varied and depended on the risk factor. For high-risk individuals with a positive family history of colorectal cancer or advanced colorectal polyp, screening should begin at age 40. Some frequently suggested screening modalities in order of frequency are colonoscopy, FIT, and CTC. Furthermore, several screening intervals were suggested, including colonoscopy every 10 years for average-risk and every 5-10 years for high-risk individuals, FIT annually in average-risk and every 1-2 years in high-risk individuals, and CTC every five years for all individuals.

CONCLUSION

All individuals with average-risk should undergo colorectal cancer screening between 45 and 75. Meanwhile, individuals with higher risks, such as those with a positive family history, should begin screening at age 40. Several recommended screening modalities were suggested, including colonoscopy every 10 years in average-risk and every 5-10 years in high-risk, FIT annually in average-risk and every 1-2 years in high-risk, and CTC every five years.

Non-metastatic colon cancer: French Intergroup Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatments, and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, SFP, AFEF, and SFR)

INTRODUCTION

This article is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of non-metastatic colon cancer (CC), revised in November 2022.

METHODS

These guidelines represent collaborative work of all French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of CC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B, and C) according to the level of evidence found in the literature published up to November 2022.

RESULTS

Initial evaluation of CC is based on clinical examination, colonoscopy, chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography (CT) scan, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay. CC is usually managed by surgery and adjuvant treatment depending on the pathological findings. The use of adjuvant therapy remains a challenging question in stage II disease. For high-risk stage II CC, adjuvant chemotherapy must be discussed and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy proposed according to the type and number of poor prognostic features. Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX or CAPOX) is the current standard for adjuvant therapy of patients with stage III CC. However, these regimens are associated with significant oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. The results of the recent IDEA study provide evidence that 3 months of treatment with CAPOX is as effective as 6 months of oxaliplatin-based therapy in patients with low-risk stage III CC (T1-3 and N1). A 6-month oxaliplatin-based therapy remains the standard of care for high-risk stage III CC (T4 and/or N2). For patients unfit for oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is recommended.

CONCLUSION

French guidelines for non-metastatic CC management help to offer the best personalized therapeutic strategy in daily clinical practice. Each individual case must be discussed within a multidisciplinary tumor board and then the treatment option decided with the patient.

Use of multi-gene panels in patients at high risk of hereditary digestive cancer: position statement of AEG, SEOM, AEGH and IMPaCT-GENÓMICA consortium

This position statement, sponsored by the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología, the Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica, the Asociación Española de Genética Humana and the IMPaCT-Genómica Consortium aims to establish recommendations for use of multi-gene panel testing in patients at high risk of hereditary gastrointestinal and pancreatic cancer. To rate the quality of the evidence and the levels of recommendation, we used the methodology based on the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). We reached a consensus among experts using a Delphi method. The document includes recommendations on clinical scenarios where multi-gene panel testing is recommended in colorectal cancer, polyposis syndromes, gastric and pancreatic cancer, as well as the genes to be considered in each clinical scenario. Recommendations on the evaluation of mosaicisms, counseling strategies in the absence of an index subject and, finally, constitutional analysis after identification of pathogenic tumor variants are also made.

Endoscopic surveillance for familial intestinal gastric cancer in low-incidence areas: An effective strategy

While clinical practice guidelines for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer are well established, there is no consensus on the approach for familial intestinal gastric cancer (FIGC). In low-incidence gastric cancer (GC) areas such as the United States or most European countries, there are no evidence-based recommendations on endoscopic assessment in FIGC families. We aim to describe the yield of GC surveillance in these families, and to identify epidemiological risk factors for the development of GC and its precursor lesions. This is a multicenter observational study involving nine tertiary Spanish hospitals, in which all individuals fulfilling FIGC criteria who underwent endoscopic surveillance were included between 1991 and 2020. Forty-one healthy individuals of 31 families were recruited. The median number of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies per individual was 3 (interquartile range, IQR, 1-4). The median interval time between tests was 2 years (IQR 1.5-2.5), and the median follow-up was 9 years (IQR 3-14.5). In 18 (43.9%) subjects, a precursor lesion of GC was found during follow-up, and in 2 (4.9%), an early GC was identified, in which curative treatment was offered. Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection proved to be independently associated with an increased risk of developing precursor lesions or GC, adjusted by age, gender and follow-up, with an Odds Ratio of 6.443 (1.36-30.6, P value .019). We present the first outcomes that support endoscopic surveillance with biopsies and detection of Hp in FIGC families, although the periodicity has yet to be defined.

Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors for Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is a heterogeneous and prevalent disease. The traditional environmental exposures associated with elevated risk of gastric cancer are less prevalent in the USA today. Genetic risks and risks associated with inflammation remain. Most cases are sporadic, and familial clustering is observed in about 10% of the cases. Hereditary gastric cancer accounts for a very low percentage of cases. Here we review the genetic and environmental risk factors associated with the disease. In addition, we will review screening guidelines and current modalities that are available for screening in high-risk populations.

[Novel Treatment Concepts in Patients with Colorectal Carcinomas and High Microsatellite Instability]

Approximately 15% of patients with colorectal cancer show high microsatellite instability (MSI-high) in their tumour tissue. For one third of these patients, there is a hereditary cause for this finding - that leads to the diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome. In combination with clinical findings such as the Amsterdam or the revised Bethesda criteria, MSI-high status has been used as a tool in identifying patients at risk. Today, MSI-status has gained much more importance, due to its impact on treatment decisions. Patients with UICC II cancers should not receive adjuvant treatment. For patients with distant metastases and MSI-high status, immune checkpoint inhibitors can be given as first line therapy - with tremendous success. Novel data show a deep response for immune checkpoint antibodies in patients with locally advanced colon as well as rectal cancer in a neoadjuvant setting. Especially for patients with MSI-high rectal cancer, there might be a novel therapeutic regimen utilising immune checkpoint inhibitors without neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy and even without surgery. This could lead to a relevant reduction in morbidity in this patient cohort. In conclusion, universal MSI-testing is essential for identifying patients at risk for Lynch syndrome and for optimal decision making in treatment planning.

[Management of the Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome]

The current evidence to guide management of Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome (PJS) is sparse. Here we summarise the European guidelines that were published in 2021 by the EHTG (European Hereditary Tumour Group), extended with new evidence on some aspects of clinical management that have been generated since then. EHTG with this revised guideline has updated and extended their own previous expert opinion guideline from 2010. For this purpose, all published literature was systematically screened and the level of evidence determined by using the GRADE methodology (Grading of Recommendations Assessment. Development and Evaluation). This was followed by a Delphi process and the consensus for a statement was achieved if the voting committee reached ≥ 80% approval.The only other more recently published guidelines encountered only addressed the clinical management of gastrointestinal and pancreatic manifestations of PJS. These recommendations were reviewed and adopted, since no further relevant literature was identified in the systematic literature search. However, additional questions were identified and formulated into recommendations after following the described process. It may be stated that 10 years after the predecessor guideline, new evidence has been sparse. As with all rare diseases, a call for more collaborative studies must here be made in order to improve patient management by addressing open clinical questions and generating collaborative evidence with increased case numbers, both nationally and internationally. With the limited published evidence, these European guidelines are the most current reference for management of PJS patients.

Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Prevention Options in Older Adults

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and its incidence increases with age. The proportion of older adults in the United States continues to rise, making CRC prevention a key health priority for our aging population. CRC is a largely preventable disease through screening and polyp surveillance, and noninvasive modalities represent an important option for older adults in whom the burdens and risks of invasive testing are higher compared with younger adults. This review highlights the evidence, risks, and benefits of noninvasive CRC screening and surveillance options in older adults and discusses the challenges of CRC prevention in this cohort.

A retrospective study of consistency between immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer

Objectives

Identification of endometrial cancers (EC) with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) is essential for Lynch syndrome screening and treatment stratification. We aimed to assess the utility of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for MMR protein expression and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based MSI assays in EC and the correlation between MMR/MSI status and various clinicopathological parameters.

Methods

We reviewed the clinical and pathological information of 333 patients with EC. MMR protein expression was assessed as retained or lost to determine MMR status by IHC staining, and MSI status was identified by PCR capillary electrophoresis (PCR-CE) testing with a National Cancer Institute (NCI) panel. The correlation of MMR/MSI status with clinicopathological features was determined by statistical analysis. Discrepant results were further analyzed using an alternative PCR-CE MSI (Promega panel) method, MLH1 promoter methylation assays, and next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Results

Among the EC patients, the overall percentage of dMMR was 25.2%, and the overall percentage of MSI-H was 24%. Among the dMMR patients, 50 (59.5%) showed loss of MLH1 and PMS2 expression, 19 (22.6%) loss of MSH2 and MSH6 expression, and seven (8.3%) and eight (9.5%) loss of PMS2 and MSH6 expression, respectively. The dMMR subgroup was significantly younger than the pMMR subgroup, especially for <60-years-old patients (p = 0.038). In addition, we identified a strong correlation between MMR/MSI status and high-grade endometrioid or nonendometrioid components (p = 0.004 or p = 0.003). IHC staining and PCR-CE assay results showed a high level of overall concordance (98.8%, Cohen's κ = 0.98). Four patients were found to have dMRR/MSS in both examinations. We reanalyzed them with additional methods. One case showed MLH1 promotor methylation, and the other three cases harbored MSH6 germline pathogenic variations. One of the cases with MSH6 deficiency was reanalyzed as MSI-H by alternative PCR-CE assay or NGS testing.

Conclusions

This study indicates that the combined use of MMR-IHC and PCR-CE MSI analyses may effectively avoid misdiagnoses of EC patients with dMMR/MSI-H. However, use of PCR-CE alone to evaluate MMR/MSI status may lead to missed diagnosis, especially for EC patients with MSH6 deficiency and presenting MSS.

Using a multistep approach with multidisciplinary team to increase the diagnosis rate of Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer after universal screening: a single-center study in Japan

BACKGROUNDS

This study aimed to evaluate the changes in the rates of genetic counseling and genetic testing as well as the diagnosis rate of Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated colorectal cancer before and after multistep approach with multidisciplinary team in Japanese.

METHODS

In September 2016, we started universal screening for LS by mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry and prospectively collected the records. Following patient interviews, we started multistep approach with multidisciplinary team (MA) in January 2020. MA consists of six surgeons, one genetic counselor, one medical geneticist, and six pathologists. MA is set up to compensate for patients' lack of knowledge about genetic diseases and make case selection for elderly colorectal cancer patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR). MA is designed as a system that could be performed by a small number of medical genetic specialists. A total of 522 patients were included during the study duration, 323 and 199 patients in the pre-MA (P-MA) and MA groups, respectively.

RESULTS

The frequency of dMMR in all patients was 10.0%. The patient interview results indicated a significant lack of patient education regarding genetic diseases. The rates of genetic counseling and genetic testing was significantly higher in MA group than in P-MA group (genetic counseling: MA 34.6% vs. P-MA 7.7%, p = 0.04; genetic testing: MA 30.8% vs. P-MA 3.8%, p = 0.02). Moreover, the diagnosis rate of LS-associated colorectal cancer was significantly higher in MA group (2.5%) than in P-MA group (0.3%) (P = 0.03). In addition, MA could be performed without problems despite the small number of medical and human genetics specialists.

CONCLUSIONS

MA has achieved appropriate pickup of suspected hereditary colorectal cancer patients and complemented the lack of knowledge about genetic diseases. The introduction of MA increased LS-associated colorectal cancer after universal screening. MA is an appropriate LS screening protocol for Japanese patients who lag behind in medical and human genetics education.

Clinical factors associated with skin neoplasms in individuals with Lynch syndrome in a longitudinal observational cohort

BACKGROUND

Little is known about patient-specific risk factors for skin neoplasia in individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS).

OBJECTIVE

Identify clinical factors associated with development of skin neoplasms in LS.

METHODS

Clinical data were systematically collected on a cohort of LS carriers (confirmed pathogenic germline variants in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, or EPCAM) age ≥18 undergoing clinical genetics care at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from January 2000 to March 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate clinical factors associated with skin neoplasia.

RESULTS

Of 607 LS carriers, 9.2% had LS-associated skin neoplasia and 15.0% had non-LS-associated skin neoplasia; 58.2% (353/607) had documentation of prior dermatologic evaluation; 29.7% (38/128) with skin neoplasms lacked a history of visceral LS-associated malignancy. LS-associated skin neoplasms were significantly associated with male sex, age, race, MLH1 pathogenic germline variants, MSH2/EPCAM pathogenic germline variants, and personal history of non-LS skin neoplasms. Non-LS-associated skin neoplasms was significantly associated with age, number of first- and second-degree relatives with non-LS-associated skin neoplasms, and personal history of LS-associated skin neoplasms.

LIMITATIONS

Single-institution observational study; demographic homogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Skin neoplasms are common in individuals with LS. We identified clinical factors associated with LS- and non-LS-associated skin neoplasms. Regular dermatologic surveillance should be considered for all LS carriers.

Current chemoprevention approaches in Lynch syndrome and Familial adenomatous polyposis: a global clinical practice survey

Background

International chemoprevention preferences and approaches in Lynch syndrome (LS) and APC-associated polyposis, including Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and attenuated FAP (AFAP) have not been previously explored.

Aim

To describe current chemoprevention strategies for patients with LS or FAP/AFAP (referred to collectively as FAP) practiced by members of four international hereditary cancer societies through administration of a survey.

Results

Ninety-six participants across four hereditary gastrointestinal cancer societies responded to the survey. Most respondents (91%, 87/96) completed information regarding their demographics and practice characteristics relating to hereditary gastrointestinal cancer and chemoprevention clinical practices. Sixty-nine percent (60/87) of respondents offer chemoprevention for FAP and/or LS as a part of their practice. Of the 75% (72/96) of survey respondents who were eligible to answer practice-based clinical vignettes based off of their responses to ten barrier questions regarding chemoprevention, 88% (63/72) of those participants completed at least one case vignette question to further characterize chemoprevention practices in FAP and/or LS. In FAP, 51% (32/63) would offer chemoprevention for rectal polyposis, with sulindac - 300 mg (18%, 10/56) and aspirin (16%, 9/56) being the most frequently selected options. In LS, 93% (55/59) of professionals discuss chemoprevention and 59% (35/59) frequently recommend chemoprevention. Close to half of the respondents (47%, 26/55) would recommend beginning aspirin at time of commencement of the patient's first screening colonoscopy (usually at age 25yrs). Ninety-four percent (47/50) of respondents would consider a patient's diagnosis of LS as an influential factor for aspirin use. There was no consensus on the dose of aspirin (≤100 mg, >100 mg - 325 mg or 600 mg) to offer patients with LS and there was no agreement on how other factors, such as BMI, hypertension, family history of colorectal cancer, and family history of heart disease, would affect the recommendation for aspirin use. Possible harm among older patients (>70 years) was identified as the most common reason to discourage aspirin use.

Conclusion

Although chemoprevention is widely discussed and offered to patients with FAP and LS by an international group of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer experts, there is significant heterogeneity in how it is applied in clinical practice.

AXIN2 germline testing in a French cohort validates pathogenic variants as a rare cause of predisposition to colorectal polyposis and cancer

Only a few patients with germline AXIN2 variants and colorectal adenomatous polyposis or cancer have been described, raising questions about the actual contribution of this gene to colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility. To assess the clinical relevance for AXIN2 testing in patients suspected of genetic predisposition to CRC, we collected clinical and molecular data from the French Oncogenetics laboratories analyzing AXIN2 in this context. Between 2004 and June 2020, 10 different pathogenic/likely pathogenic AXIN2 variants were identified in 11 unrelated individuals. Eight variants were from a consecutive series of 3322 patients, which represents a frequency of 0.24%. However, loss-of-function AXIN2 variants were strongly associated with genetic predisposition to CRC as compared with controls (odds ratio: 11.89, 95% confidence interval: 5.103-28.93). Most of the variants were predicted to produce an AXIN2 protein devoid of the SMAD3-binding and DIX domains, but preserving the β-catenin-binding domain. Ninety-one percent of the AXIN2 variant carriers who underwent colonoscopy had adenomatous polyposis. Forty percent of the variant carriers developed colorectal or/and other digestive cancer. Multiple tooth agenesis was present in at least 60% of them. Our report provides further evidence for a role of AXIN2 in CRC susceptibility, arguing for AXIN2 testing in patients with colorectal adenomatous polyposis or cancer.

Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance in Carriers of a Germline Pathogenic Variant in CDKN2A

Three percent of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) present a germline pathogenic variant (GPV) associated with an increased risk of this tumor, CDKN2A being one of the genes associated with the highest risk. There is no clear consensus on the recommendations for surveillance in CDKN2A GPV carriers, although the latest guidelines from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium recommend annual endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) regardless of family history. Our aim is to describe the findings of the PDAC surveillance program in a cohort of healthy CDKN2A GPV heterozygotes. This is an observational analysis of prospectively collected data from all CDKN2A carriers who underwent screening for PDAC at the high-risk digestive cancer clinic of the “Hospital Clínic de Barcelona” between 2013 and 2021. A total of 78 subjects were included. EUS or MRI was performed annually with a median follow-up of 66 months. Up to 17 pancreatic findings were described in 16 (20.5%) individuals under surveillance, although most of them were benign. No significant precursor lesions were identified, but an early PDAC was detected and treated. While better preventive strategies are developed, we believe that annual surveillance with EUS and/or MRI in CDKN2A GPV heterozygotes may be beneficial.

Outcomes of upper endoscopy screening in Lynch syndrome: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lynch syndrome (LS) predisposes affected individuals to a high lifetime risk of malignancies, including colorectal, endometrial, gastric, and duodenal cancers. The role of upper GI (UGI) cancer screening in LS has been uncertain, but recent studies have evaluated its utility.

METHODS

Databases were queried through December 2021 to identify studies that examined upper endoscopy screening in LS using EGD. Mantel-Haenszel pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes were constructed using a random-effects model to identify pooled odds of endoscopic findings in persons with LS. Event rates for detection of gastric and duodenal cancers, high-risk lesions, and clinically actionable findings were calculated. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.

RESULTS

Nine studies were identified with 2356 LS patients undergoing approximately 7838 EGDs. In total, 47 LS-associated UGI cancers (18 gastric and 29 duodenal cancers), 237 high-risk lesions, and 335 clinically actionable findings were identified. The pooled event rate for detection of any UGI cancer, high-risk lesions, and clinically actionable findings during screening were .9% (95% CI, .3-2.1; I² = 89%), 4.2% (95% CI, 1.6-10.9; I² = 98%), and 6.2% (95% CI, 2.2-16.5; I² = 99%), respectively. There was no difference between LS-associated gene and gastric or duodenal cancer detection.

CONCLUSIONS

In LS, there is evidence that endoscopic screening detects UGI cancers, precancerous lesions, and other clinically actionable findings that favor its use as a part of cancer risk management in LS.

Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients with the Highest Risk of Gastric Cancer: Challenges and Solutions

Gastric cancer is one of the most significant causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Recognized modifiable risk factors include Helicobacter pylori infection, geographic location, select dietary factors, tobacco use and alcohol consumption. In addition, multiple hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes are associated with significantly elevated gastric cancer risk. Endoscopic surveillance in hereditary gastric cancer predisposition syndromes has the potential to identify gastric cancer at earlier and more treatable stages, as well as to prevent development of gastric cancer through identification of precancerous lesions. However, much uncertainty remains regarding use of endoscopic surveillance in hereditary gastric cancer predisposition syndromes, including whether or not it should be routinely performed, the surveillance interval and age of initiation, cost-effectiveness, and whether surveillance ultimately improves survival from gastric cancer for these high-risk individuals. In this review, we outline the hereditary gastric cancer predisposition syndromes associated with the highest gastric cancer risks. Additionally, we cover current evidence and guidelines addressing hereditary gastric cancer risk and surveillance in these syndromes, along with current challenges and limitations that emphasize a need for continued research in this field.

Identification of HnRNP Family as Prognostic Biomarkers in Five Major Types of Gastrointestinal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs), a large family of RNAbinding proteins, have been implicated in tumor progression in multiple cancer types. However, the expression pattern and prognostic value of hnRNPs in five gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, including gastric, colorectal, esophageal, liver, and pancreatic cancer, remain to be investigated.

OBJECTIVE

The current research aimed to identify prognostic biomarkers of the hnRNP family in five major types of gastrointestinal cancer.

METHODS

Oncomine, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), and Kaplan-Meier Plotter were used to explore the hnRNPs expression levels concerning clinicopathological parameters and prognostic values. The protein level of hnRNPU was validated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in human tissue specimens. Genetic alterations of hnRNPs were analyzed using cBioportal, and Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses were performed to illustrate the biological functions of co-expressed genes of hnRNPs.

RESULTS

The vast majority of hnRNPs were highly expressed in five types of GI cancer tissues compared to their adjacent normal tissues, and mRNA levels of hnRNPA2B1, D, Q, R, and U were significantly different in various GI cancer types at different stages. In addition, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the increased hnRNPs expression levels were correlated with better prognosis in gastric and rectal cancer patients (log-rank p < 0.05). In contrast, patients with high levels of hnRNPs exhibited a worse prognosis in esophageal and liver cancer (log-rank p < 0.05). Using immunohistochemistry, we further confirmed that hnRNPU was overexpressed in gastric, rectal, and liver cancers. In addition, hnRNPs genes were altered in patients with GI cancers, and RNA-related processing was correlated with hnRNPs alterations.

CONCLUSION

We identified differentially expressed genes of hnRNPs in tumor tissues versus adjacent normal tissues, which might contribute to predicting tumor types, early diagnosis, and targeted therapies in five major types of GI cancer.

Risk factors for gastric cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome

INTRODUCTION

The cumulative lifetime risk of gastric cancer (GC) in patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) is reported to be 8%. There is limited evidence on specific risk factors for GC and no agreement among guidelines on gastric endoscopic surveillance schedule in LS patients.

AIMS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to identify risk factors for gastric precancerous conditions (chronic atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia) and GC in patients with LS and a case-control study to compare the prevalence of these conditions with a control group.

RESULTS

We included 385 LS patients (40.5% male, mean age 49.0 years). During a median follow-up period of 48 months (interquartile range, 24-84 months), precancerous conditions were identified in 110 patients (34%) and the prevalence of advanced stages of atrophic gastritis was 3% for OLGA III/IV and 0.6% OLGIM III/IV. Family history of GC was significantly associated with OLGA III/IV ( P = 0.020). Among LS patients, 10 patients (2.6%) were diagnosed with GC (incidence rate of 5/1000 persons-year). Older age and OLGA III/IV were identified as risk factors for GC ( P < 0.001). When compared with controls, patients with LS had significantly higher rates of Hp infection ( P = 0.035) and lower OLGA and OLGIM stages ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.026, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, the incidence of GC and advanced stages of atrophic gastritis was low. Older age and OLGA III/IV were associated with a higher risk of GC. Identification of risk factors for GC in LS patients can help tailoring endoscopic surveillance.

Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Surveillance in Lynch Syndrome

Simple Summary

Lynch syndrome is the most common cause of hereditary colorectal cancer, but is also associated with increased extracolonic cancer risk, including upper gastrointestinal cancers. While there is agreement regarding the benefit of frequent colonoscopic surveillance in Lynch syndrome, there remains a lack of consensus on the use of upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance. Here, we review the upper gastrointestinal cancer risks in Lynch syndrome, the varying guideline recommendations in this area, and the published outcomes of upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance in this high-risk population. Finally, we highlight ongoing controversies in upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance and opine on how upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance can be incorporated into a Lynch syndrome risk management program. Upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance is an increasingly studied area of risk management in Lynch syndrome, and continued research will be vital in determining how to best incorporate this surveillance in these high-risk patients.

Abstract

Lynch syndrome is a common hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome associated with increased digestive cancer risk including colorectal, gastric, and duodenal cancers. While colorectal cancer surveillance is widely accepted to be an important part of a comprehensive Lynch syndrome risk management plan, the use of upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome remains more controversial. Currently, upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance guidelines for Lynch syndrome vary widely, and there is no consensus on who should undergo upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance, how surveillance should be performed, the age at which to initiate surveillance, or how often individuals with Lynch syndrome should undergo upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance. Fortunately, research groups around the world have been focusing on upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome, and recent evidence in this field has demonstrated that upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance can be performed with identification of precancerous lesions as well as early-stage upper gastrointestinal cancers. In this manuscript, we review the upper gastrointestinal cancer risks in Lynch syndrome, differing guideline recommendations for surveillance, outcomes of upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance, and controversies in the field, and we provide a framework based on our collective experience with which to incorporate upper gastrointestinal cancer surveillance into a risk management program for individuals with Lynch syndrome.

Acromegaly and Colorectal Neoplasm: An Update

Acromegaly is a systemic disease caused by excessive inappropriate secretion of GH and IGF-I levels, resulting in many systemic complications, including cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic diseases, and a possible increased risk of some neoplasias. Although many studies on acromegaly and cancer remain uncertain, most data indicate that colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is increased in this population. The exact mechanism involved in the role of GH-IGF-I axis in CRC has not been fully explained, yet it is associated with local and circulating effects of GH and IGF-I on the colon, promoting angiogenesis, cell proliferation, risk of mutation, inhibition of tumor-suppressor genes and apoptosis, thus facilitating a tumor microenvironment. Nevertheless, population-based studies present controversial findings on CRC incidence and mortality. All worldwide guidelines and expert consensuses agree with the need for colonoscopic screening and surveillance in acromegaly, although there is no consensus regarding the best period to do this. This review aims to analyze the existing data on CRC and acromegaly, exploring its pathophysiology, epidemiological studies and their limitations, colonic polyp characteristics, overall cancer and CRC incidences and mortality, risk factors for colon cancer pathophysiology, and recommendation guideline aspects.

Uptake and outcomes of small intestinal and urinary tract cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome associated with increased risk of multiple cancers. While colorectal cancer surveillance decreases mortality in LS and is recommended by guidelines, there is lack of evidence for the efficacy of surveillance for extra-colonic cancers associated with LS, including small intestinal cancer (SIC) and urinary tract cancer (UTC). Given the limited evidence, guidelines do not consistently recommend surveillance for SIC and UTC, and it remains unclear how often individuals will choose to undergo and follow through with extra-colonic surveillance recommendations.

AIM

To study factors associated with SIC and UTC surveillance uptake and outcomes in LS.

METHODS

This is an IRB-approved retrospective analysis of individuals with LS seen at a tertiary care referral center. Included individuals had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, or EPCAM, or were a confirmed obligate carrier, and had at least one documented visit to our center. Information regarding SIC and UTC surveillance was captured for each individual, and detailed personal and family history was obtained for individuals who had an initial LS management visit in our center’s dedicated high-risk LS clinic between January 1, 2017 and October 29, 2020. During these initial management visits, all patients had in-depth discussions of SIC and UTC surveillance with 1 of 3 providers experienced in LS management to promote informed decision-making about whether to pursue SIC and/or UTC surveillance. Statistical analysis using Pearson’s chi-squared test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test was completed to understand the factors associated with pursuit and completion of SIC and UTC surveillance, and a P value below 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of 317 individuals with LS, 86 (27%) underwent a total of 105 SIC surveillance examinations, with 5 leading to additional work-up and no SICs diagnosed. Additionally, 99 (31%) patients underwent a total of 303 UTC surveillance examinations, with 19 requiring further evaluation and 1 UTC identified. Of 155 individuals who had an initial LS management visit between January 1, 2017 and October 29, 2020, 63 (41%) chose to undergo SIC surveillance and 58 (37%) chose to undergo UTC surveillance. However, only 26 (41%) and 32 (55%) of those who initially chose to undergo SIC or UTC surveillance, respectively, successfully completed their surveillance examinations. Individuals with a pathogenic variant in MSH2 or EPCAM were more likely to initially choose to undergo SIC surveillance (P = 0.034), and older individuals were more likely to complete SIC surveillance (P = 0.007). Choosing to pursue UTC surveillance was more frequent among older individuals (P = 0.018), and females more frequently completed UTC surveillance (P = 0.002). Personal history of cancer and family history of SIC or UTC were not significantly associated with electing nor completing surveillance. Lastly, the provider discussing SIC/UTC surveillance was significantly associated with subsequent surveillance choices.

CONCLUSION

Pursuing and completing SIC/UTC surveillance in LS is influenced by several factors, however broad incorporation in LS management is likely unhelpful due to low yield and frequent false positive results.

Screening and surveillance for gastric cancer: Does family history play an important role in shaping our strategy?

Family history is an important risk factor of gastric cancer. No guidelines have been developed that target gastric cancer with a family history; only hereditary familial gastric cancer is targeted. We review the available evidence regarding the familial aggregation mechanisms of gastric cancer and a strategy of screening and surveillance for gastric cancer in individuals with a positive family history of the disease. As there is a synergic effect of Helicobacter pylori infection and family history on the increased risk of gastric cancer, Helicobacter pylori eradication should be considered in all infected individuals with a family history of gastric cancer. Currently, there is weak evidence indicating that suitable timing to initiate eradication therapy is at the age of 20, when precancerous lesions, including significant gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia, have not been established. Reasonable timing to initiate screening for gastric cancer in individuals with a family history of gastric cancer is 10 years prior to the age of onset of gastric cancer in affected relatives. A 2-year surveillance interval, instead of the 3-year interval recommended in the present guidelines, may be better to detect early gastric cancer in those individuals who have already developed precancerous gastric lesions.

Real-world outcome of universal screening for Lynch syndrome in Japanese patients with colorectal cancer highlights the importance of targeting patients with young-onset disease

Despite the recommendations of the latest guidelines, the practical efficacy of universal screening for identifying Lynch syndrome (LS) among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) may be limited in the real world due to infrequent referrals and the difficulties of genetic testing. Thus, the present study aimed to retrospectively analyze the results of universal screening of patients with CRC at a referral hospital in Japan. Immunohistochemistry was performed for mismatch repair proteins [including DNA mismatch repair protein MSH6 (MSH6), mismatch repair endonuclease PMS2 (PMS2), DNA mismatch repair protein Msh2 (MSH2) and DNA mismatch repair protein Mlh1 (MLH1)] and BRAF V600E mutation. Tumors that showed the following were considered to indicate LS and patients with such tumors were designated as genetic testing candidates (GTCs): i) Loss of MSH6/MSH2; ii) loss of MSH6 alone; iii) loss of PMS2 alone; and iv) loss of PMS2/MLH1 with negative BRAF V600E. MLH1 methylation and BRAF V600E mutation were analyzed in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) tumors retrospectively. The frequency of dMMR and GTCs in an independent cohort of patients with young-onset CRC were also investigated. Universal screening revealed dMMR tumors, GTCs and LS probands in 7.3, 3.9 and 0.4%, respectively, of 463 patients with CRC. Although dMMR tumors were observed in both younger (<50 years) and older (≥60 years) patients, the GTCs were enriched in younger individuals. Evaluation of mismatch repair status in an independent cohort confirmed the high rate of GTCs in patients with young-onset CRC. The low detection rate of LS demonstrated in this study questions the implementation of routine universal screening in regions with low prevalence of LS. Considering the enrichment of GTCs in young-onset CRCs, age-restricted strategies may be simple and efficient practical alternatives to universal screening in the real world.

Gene-Specific Variation in Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Strategies for Lynch Syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lynch syndrome is associated with pathogenic variants in 4 mismatch repair (MMR) genes that increase lifetime risk of colorectal cancer. Guidelines recommend intensive colorectal cancer surveillance with colonoscopy every 1-2 years starting at age 25 years for all carriers of Lynch syndrome-associated variants, regardless of gene product. We constructed a simulation model to analyze the effects of different ages of colonoscopy initiation and surveillance intervals for each MMR gene (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, quality-adjusted life-years, and cost.

METHODS

Using published literature, we developed a Markov simulation model of Lynch syndrome progression for patients with each MMR variant. The model simulated clinical trials of Lynch syndrome carriers, varying age of colonoscopy initiation (5-year increments from 25-40 years), and surveillance intervals (1-5 years). We assessed the optimal strategy for each gene, defined as the strategy with the highest quality-adjusted life-years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio below a $100,000 willingness-to-pay threshold.

RESULTS

Optimal surveillance for patients with pathogenic variants in the MLH1 and MSH2 genes was colonoscopy starting at age 25 years, with 1- to 2-year surveillance intervals. Initiating colonoscopy at age 35 and 40 years, with 3-year intervals, was cost-effective for patients with pathogenic variants in MSH6 or PMS2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a simulation model to select optimal surveillance starting ages and intervals for patients with Lynch syndrome based on MMR variant. The model supports recommendations for intensive surveillance of patients with Lynch syndrome-associated variants in MLH1 or MSH2. However, for patients with Lynch syndrome-associated variants of MSH6 or PMS2, later initiation of surveillance at 35 and 40 years, respectively, and at 3-year intervals, can be considered.

Inherited Predisposition to Gastric Cancer

Approximately 10% of patients with gastric cancer show familial aggregation and up to 3% are related to an inherited cancer syndrome. There are multiple germline pathogenic variants and cancer syndromes associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer. Appropriate assessment of familial and genetic risk may allow a personalized approach to gastric cancer prevention through screening and risk-reducing surgeries. The ability to better identify carriers with pathogenic genetic variants associated with gastric cancer before a diagnosis of cancer requires effective genetic risk assessment and testing, followed by optimal screening and surveillance recommendations to further reduce the morbidity and mortality.

The contribution of Lynch syndrome to early onset malignancy in Ireland

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant hereditary cancer syndrome responsible for 2-4% of hereditary colorectal cancers (CRC). Mismatch repair protein deficiency (dMMR) is a characteristic feature of LS. It has been associated with a poor response to standard chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). There is currently no LS database to monitor trends of disease in Ireland. We aim to centralise LS data in Ireland to assess the burden of LS in Ireland and guide improvements in prevention and treatment of LS-associated cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out including all medical records for LS patients from two of the three cancer genetics clinics in Ireland between 2000 and 2018 was carried out. Clinicopathological data of probands (n = 57) and affected family members including demographics, mutation status, cancer diagnosis and outcome was recorded. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS software.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven families including three-hundred and forty-five individuals affected by cancer were identified. The most common cancers recorded were colorectal (53%), breast (12%) and endometrial (10%). One-hundred and thirty-eight confirmed carriers were identified: 65 path_MLH1 (47%), 43 path_MSH2 (31%), 11 path_MSH6 (8%), 17 path_PMS2 (12%) and two path_EPCAM (1%). Cancer type varied significantly by gene. Median age of first diagnosis was 44.5 years (range 23-81). Half of all deceased patients (n = 11) in this group died within 2.5 years of first diagnosis. These deaths were directly related to cancer in 59% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Under diagnosis of LS misses a powerful preventive and therapeutic opportunity. LS causes early onset dMMR cancer diagnoses with substantial societal impact. Implementation of ICBs into treatment policy for this small cohort of dMMR mCRC is an achievable therapeutic goal that may significantly improve survival. A prospective database for LS in Ireland is necessary to maximise prevention in this population.

Characteristics of colorectal carcinoma patients with PMS2 defects detected by immunohistochemistry

Lynch syndrome is the most prevalent form of familial colorectal cancer (CRC) and is caused by pathogenic germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations. MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutations have been well studied, but the rate and characteristics of PMS2 mutations are rare, especially in China. This study enrolled 1706 unselected patients with CRC who underwent colorectal resection from June 2016 to November 2018, the MMR status and clinicopathological features were analysed. A total of 11.8% of patients with CRC had defects in at least one MMR-related protein. Among them, 8.3% were identified with PMS2 defects, and 3.1% of patients had isolated PMS2 defects. Compared with MMR-proficient CRC, PMS2-defect CRC occurred more frequently in the right colon and less frequently in the rectum, had more poorly differentiated and mucinous carcinoma cases, and had fewer perineural invasions and a lower pN stage but a more advanced pT stage and a larger tumour size. In the cases with PMS2 defect, there were fewer tumours in the right colon, fewer poorly differentiated cases and smaller tumour sizes than in the cases with both MLH1 and PMS2 defects. In addition, in cases with isolated PMS2 defects, there were more tumours in the right colon and, more mucinous carcinoma cases than in cases with MMR-proficient CRCs, but had a similar cancer onset age. This study identified the rate, clinicopathological and age characteristics of PMS2 defects in CRCs in China and highlighted the importance of universal screening and germline detection of PMS2 in CRC.

Upper Gastrointestinal Lesions during Endoscopy Surveillance in Patients with Lynch Syndrome: A Multicentre Cohort Study

Simple Summary

Patients with Lynch syndrome are at increased risk of upper gastrointestinal cancer. Recommendations for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy screening vary widely with limited data supporting effectiveness. The aim of our study was to investigate yields of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy screening in a large multicentre cohort of 172 Lynch syndrome mutation carriers. In our study, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy surveillance detects frequent neoplastic lesions particularly after the age of 40 years. Ours results suggest that Lynch patients should be considered for upper gastrointestinal endoscopic and Helicobacter pylori screening.

Abstract

Background: Patients with Lynch syndrome are at increased risk of gastric and duodenal cancer. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy surveillance is generally proposed, even though little data are available on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in these patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prevalence and incidence of gastrointestinal lesions following upper gastrointestinal endoscopy examination in Lynch patients. Methods: A large, multicentre cohort of 172 patients with a proven germline mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes and at least one documented upper gastrointestinal endoscopy screening was assessed. Detailed information was collected on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings and the outcome of endoscopic follow-up. Results: Seventy neoplastic gastrointestinal lesions were diagnosed in 45 patients (26%) out of the 172 patients included. The median age at diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal lesions was 54 years. The prevalence of cancer at initial upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was 5% and the prevalence of precancerous lesions was 12%. Upper gastrointestinal lesions were more frequent after 40 years of age (p < 0.001). Helicobacter pylori infection was associated with an increased prevalence of gastric, but not duodenal, lesions (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Neoplastic upper gastrointestinal lesions are frequent in patients with Lynch syndrome, especially in those over 40 years of age. The results of our study suggest that Lynch patients should be considered for upper gastrointestinal endoscopic and Helicobacter pylori screening.

Beyond the Guidelines: The Grey Zones of the Management of Gastric Cancer. Consensus Statements from the Gastric Cancer Italian Network (GAIN)

BACKGROUND

Management of gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains challenging, because of the heterogeneity in tumor biology within the upper gastrointestinal tract. Daily clinical practice is full of grey areas regarding the complexity of diagnostic, staging, and therapeutic procedures. The aim of this paper is to provide a guide for clinicians facing challenging situations in routine practice, taking a multidisciplinary consensus approach based on available literature.

METHODS

The GAIN (GAstric cancer Italian Network) group was established with the aims of reviewing literature evidence, discussing key issues in prevention, diagnosis, and management of gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma, and offering a summary of statements. A Delphi consensus method was used to obtain opinions from the expert panel of specialists.

RESULTS

Forty-nine clinical questions were identified in six areas of interest: role of multidisciplinary team; risk factors; diagnosis; management of early gastric cancer and multimodal approach to localized gastric cancer; treatment of elderly patients with locally advanced resectable disease; and treatment of locally advanced and metastatic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The statements presented may guide clinicians in practical management of this disease.

The Management of Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome: European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG) Guideline

The scientific data to guide the management of Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS) are sparse. The available evidence has been reviewed and discussed by diverse medical specialists in the field of PJS to update the previous guideline from 2010 and formulate a revised practical guideline for colleagues managing PJS patients. Methods: Literature searches were performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane. Evidence levels and recommendation strengths were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). A Delphi process was followed, with consensus being reached when ≥80% of the voting guideline committee members agreed. Recommendations and statements: The only recent guidelines available were for gastrointestinal and pancreatic management. These were reviewed and endorsed after confirming that no more recent relevant papers had been published. Literature searches were performed for additional questions and yielded a variable number of relevant papers depending on the subject addressed. Additional recommendations and statements were formulated. Conclusions: A decade on, the evidence base for recommendations remains poor, and collaborative studies are required to provide better data about this rare condition. Within these restrictions, multisystem, clinical management recommendations for PJS have been formulated.

Diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome and Strategies to Distinguish Lynch-Related Tumors from Sporadic MSI/dMMR Tumors

Simple Summary

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome (LS)-related tumors but is not specific, as most of MSI/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors are sporadic. Therefore, the identification of MSI/dMMR requires additional diagnostic tools to identify LS. In this review, we address the hallmarks of LS and present recent advances in diagnostic and screening strategies to identify LS patients. We also discuss the pitfalls associated with current strategies, which should be taken into account in order to improve the diagnosis of LS.

Abstract

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of Lynch syndrome (LS)-related tumors but is not specific to it, as approximately 80% of MSI/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors are sporadic. Methods leading to the diagnosis of LS have considerably evolved in recent years and so have tumoral tests for LS screening and for the discrimination of LS-related to MSI-sporadic tumors. In this review, we address the hallmarks of LS, including the clinical, histopathological, and molecular features. We present recent advances in diagnostic and screening strategies to identify LS patients. We also discuss the pitfalls associated with the current strategies, which should be taken into account to improve the diagnosis of LS and avoid inappropriate clinical management.

Recent advances in the pathology of heritable gastric cancer syndromes

Despite the relative rarity of hereditary gastric cancer syndromes, the prompt recognition of their specific clinical features and histopathological characteristics is pivotal in offering patients the most appropriate treatment. In this article, we address the three major inherited syndromes that primarily affect the stomach: hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), caused by germline variants in CDH1 and CTNNA1; gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach, caused by germline mutations in promoter 1B of APC; and familial intestinal gastric cancer, which has a poorly defined genetic cause. The main focus will be on HDGC, in light of the recent publication of updated clinical practice guidelines and emerging concepts regarding HDGC histopathology. In particular, we describe the broad morphological spectrum of HDGC lesions, stressing the importance of recognising indolent and aggressive phenotypes. Moreover, we discuss the increased risk of gastric (pre)malignancies developing in patients with other well-defined hereditary cancer syndromes, such as familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, and hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome.

Importance of early detection of juvenile polyposis syndrome: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Juvenile polyposis syndrome (JPS) is a rare genetic gastrointestinal disorder with hidden and variable clinical features. Early detection is crucial for good prognosis.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 20-year-old female went to hospital for fever, and was unexpectedly diagnosed as JPS during treatment. She reported no clinical signs or family history of JPS.

DIAGNOSIS

Blood routine examination on hospital admission suggested a moderate anemia. Bone marrow cytology and leukemia fusion gene test were performed to rule out leukemia. Other examinations including ultrasound and computed tomography were also conducted for differential diagnosis. Further electronic colonoscopy identified more than 20 pedicle polyps located at her ileocecum and rectum. Mutation analysis detected a novel de novo pathogenic variant, c.910C>T (p.Gln304Ter) within bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 1A gene, establishing the diagnosis of JPS.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was treated with endoscopic interventions. We also provided a genetic counseling for this family.

OUTCOMES

The patient's polyps were removed, some of which already had adenomatous changes. The patient received surveillance of hereditary colorectal cancer according to guidelines.

LESSONS

Variable features and lack of family history probably lead to a great underestimation of potential JPS population. It is recommended to perform genetic testing by a multigene panel in individuals who have suspected symptoms of polyposis.

Targeted next-generation sequencing as a diagnostic tool in gastrointestinal system cancer/polyposis patients

Background:

Recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology have enabled multigene testing and changed the diagnostic approach to hereditary gastrointestinal cancer/polyposis syndromes. The aim of this study was to analyze different cancer predisposition genes in hereditary/sporadic gastrointestinal cancer/polyposis.

Methods:

Cancer predisposition genes were analyzed with an Illumina MiSeq NGS system in 80 patients with gastrointestinal cancer/polyposis who were examined between the years 2016 and 2019. Deletion/duplication analysis of MLH1, MSH2, and EPCAM genes was performed by using the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification method.

Results:

Germline testing of hereditary cancer-related genes was performed in 80 patients with gastrointestinal cancer/polyposis. A total of 30 variants in 30 cases (37.5%) were assessed as pathogenic/likely pathogenic. A total of 19 heterozygous variants were assessed as variants of uncertain clinical significance in 17 cases (21.25%) and 18 (22.5%) novel variations (9 pathogenic/likely pathogenic, 9 variants of uncertain significance) were determined. In 4 (5%) cases, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification detected deletions in MLH1, MSH2, and EPCAM genes.

Conclusion:

The accumulation of analyses with multigene testing will increase the available data for cancer predisposition genes in hereditary gastrointestinal cancer/polyposis. Educational campaigns for prevention, efficient screening programs, and more personalized care based on the profile of individual patients are necessary.

Reorganization of the endoscopic activity of Cancer Institutes during phase II of the Covid-19 emergency

After the lockdown during the emergency phase of the Covid-19 pandemic, we have to deal with phase 2, a period of uncertain duration, with a controlled and progressive return to normalization, in which we need to reconcile our work and our movements with the presence of the virus on our territory. Digestive endoscopic activity is a high-risk transmission procedure for Covid-19. The measures put in place to protect healthcare personnel and patients are stressful and "time-consuming" and lead to a reduction in the number of endoscopic procedures that can be performed. In this scenario, the Oncological Institutes are forced to make a rigorous selection of patients to undergo endoscopic examinations and treatments, according to lists of exceptional priorities, in order to guarantee cancer patients and subjects at high risk of developing digestive tumors, a preferential diagnostic and therapeutic process, protected from contagion risks. For this purpose, cuts and postponing times of endoscopic performances are here proposed, which go beyond the guidelines of scientific societies and have little evidences in the literature. These changes should be applied limited to this exceptional period and in proportion to the capacity of each operating unit in order to meet the demands of the patients.

Gastric cancer screening in low incidence populations: Position statement of AEG, SEED and SEAP

This positioning document, sponsored by the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica, aims to establish recommendations for the screening of gastric cancer (GC) in low incidence populations, such as the Spanish. To establish the quality of the evidence and the levels of recommendation, we used the methodology based on the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). We obtained a consensus among experts using a Delphi method. The document evaluates screening in the general population, individuals with relatives with GC and subjects with GC precursor lesions (GCPL). The goal of the interventions should be to reduce GC related mortality. We recommend the use of the OLGIM classification and determine the intestinal metaplasia (IM) subtype in the evaluation of GCPL. We do not recommend to establish endoscopic mass screening for GC or Helicobacter pylori. However, the document strongly recommends to treat H.pylori if the infection is detected, and the investigation and treatment in individuals with a family history of GC or with GCPL. Instead, we recommend against the use of serological tests to detect GCPL. Endoscopic screening is suggested only in individuals that meet familial GC criteria. As for individuals with GCPL, endoscopic surveillance is only suggested in extensive IM associated with additional risk factors (incomplete IM and/or a family history of GC), after resection of dysplastic lesions or in patients with dysplasia without visible lesion after a high quality gastroscopy with chromoendoscopy.

Complete Loss of EPCAM Immunoexpression Identifies EPCAM Deletion Carriers in MSH2-Negative Colorectal Neoplasia

Simple Summary

Colorectal carcinomas from patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) due to EPCAM deletions show loss of MSH2 expression. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of EPCAM expression in identifying carriers of EPCAM deletion among patients with MSH2-negative lesions. MSH2 and EPCAM immunohistochemistry was performed in a large series of lesions (190) composed of malignant and benign neoplasms as well as precursor lesions of different organs from 71 patients with suspected LS due to MSH2 alterations. Germ-line analysis confirmed LS in 68 patients due to MSH2 mutations (53) and EPCAM deletions (15). Among colorectal lesions with lack of MSH2 expression, only 17 were EPCAM-negative and belonged to patients with EPCAM deletions. We confirm that loss of EPCAM expression identifies EPCAM deletion carriers with 100% specificity and we recommend adding EPCAM IHC to the algorithm of MSH2-negative colorectal neoplasia.

Abstract

The use of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EPCAM) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is not included in the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening algorithm to detect Lynch syndrome (LS) patients. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate that EPCAM IHC is a useful tool to guide the LS germ-line analysis when a loss of MSH2 expression was present. We retrospectively studied MSH2 and EPCAM IHC in a large series of 190 lesions composed of malignant neoplasms (102), precursor lesions of gastrointestinal (71) and extra-gastrointestinal origin (9), and benign neoplasms (8) from different organs of 71 patients suspicious of being LS due to MSH2 alterations. LS was confirmed in 68 patients, 53 with MSH2 mutations and 15 with EPCAM 3′-end deletions. Tissue microarrays were constructed with human normal tissues and their malignant counterparts to assist in the evaluation of EPCAM staining. Among 154 MSH2-negative lesions, 17 were EPCAM-negative, including 10 CRC and 7 colorectal polyps, and 5 of them showed only isolated negative glands. All lesions showing a lack of EPCAM expression belonged to patients with EPCAM 3′-end deletions. EPCAM IHC is a useful screening tool, with 100% specificity to identify LS patients due to EPCAM 3′-end deletions in MSH2-negative CRC and MSH2-negative colorectal polyps.

Comparison Between Familial Colorectal Cancer Type X and Lynch Syndrome: Molecular, Clinical, and Pathological Characteristics and Pedigrees

Objective

This study aimed to compare the molecular, clinical, and pathological characteristics and pedigrees of familial colorectal cancer type X (FCCTX) with those of Lynch syndrome (LS) to provide a theoretical basis for the management of FCCTX.

Methods

Overall, 46 cases of FCCTX and 47 LS probands and affected families were enrolled between June 2008 and September 2018 for this study. Multigene cancer panel tests that included 139 genes were performed for all patients, and variants in each group were described. The clinical, pathological, and pedigree characteristics were also compared between the two groups.

Results

In total, 42 variants were detected in 27 (58.7%) cases in the FCCTX group, with BRCA1, BRCA2, POLE, POLD1, ATR, and ATM being the most frequently mutated genes. The mean onset age of colorectal cancer (CRC) was significantly older in the FCCTX group than in the LS group (53.57 ± 12.88 years vs. 44.36 ± 11.26 years, t = −9.204, p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with rectal cancer was also higher in the FCCTX group than in the LS group [43.5% (20/46) vs. 10.6% (5/47), χ² = 12.823, p = 0.005]. Within a median follow-up time of 53.9 ± 37.0 months, the proportion of patients who developed metachronous CRC was significantly higher in the LS group than in the FCCTX group [34.0% (16/47) vs. 13.0% (6/46), χ² = 5.676, p = 0.017]. When comparing pedigrees, older age at cancer onset and rectal cancer clustering were observed in the FCCTX families. A higher prevalence in male patients was also observed in the FCCTX families.

Conclusion

FCCTX is an entity distinct from LS, but its genetic etiology remains unknown. A larger multigene panel would be recommended for determining the underlying pathogenic variants. Considering the pathology and moderate penetrance of the CRC link to FCCTX, less stringent surgical treatments and colonoscopy surveillance would be preferable. Rectum preference is a typical feature of FCCTX. Colonoscopy surveillance in FCCTX families could be less intensive, and more attention should be given to male members.

Upper Endoscopic Surveillance in Lynch Syndrome Detects Gastric and Duodenal Adenocarcinomas

Lynch syndrome is a prevalent hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome. While colorectal cancer is the most common gastrointestinal (GI) cancer in Lynch syndrome, there is also increased risk of gastric and small intestinal cancers. Recommendations for upper GI cancer surveillance in Lynch syndrome vary widely with limited data supporting effectiveness. Herein, we collected data on individuals with a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome seen at our tertiary care referral center. We identified individuals who underwent upper endoscopy and those with upper GI cancers, and associated demographics, genetic testing results, and endoscopic information. Standard statistical analyses were performed. Among 295 individuals with Lynch syndrome seen at our center, 217 (73.6%) underwent 660 total upper endoscopies. Of these 217, precancerous upper endoscopy findings included Barrett's esophagus (7, 3.2%), gastric intestinal metaplasia (18, 8.3%), and duodenal adenomas (4, 1.8%), and Helicobacter pylori was identified in 6 (2.8%). Upper GI cancers were diagnosed in 11 individuals (3.7%), including esophageal in 1, gastric in 6, and duodenal in 4. Five (1.7%) of these upper GI cancers were identified on surveillance. Individuals with upper GI cancers identified on surveillance were older at first surveillance endoscopy, with median age 63.3 versus 44.9 years (P < 0.001). Of the upper GI cancers detected on surveillance, 80% (4/5) occurred within 2 years of last upper endoscopy and 80% were stage I. In conclusion, upper endoscopy surveillance in Lynch syndrome identifies upper GI cancers. For individuals with Lynch syndrome who undergo upper GI surveillance, a short surveillance interval may be warranted.

Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Gastric and Pancreatic Cancer in High-Risk Gastrointestinal Cancer Clinics: An Effective Strategy

The identification of high-risk groups of gastric (GC) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) due to a hereditary basis could imply a benefit in the affected families by establishing personalized preventive strategies. We aimed at assessing the diagnostic yield of GC/PC hereditary syndromes in individuals evaluated based on specific clinical criteria. In total, 77 unrelated individuals (45 from GC group/32 from PC group) were recruited: 51 (66.2%) cancer diagnosis ≤60 years, 3 (4%) with personal history of GC/PC and other cancer and 23 (29.8%) due to family history. Immunohistochemical analysis of DNA mismatch repair proteins was performed in 38 (49.3%) available tumors, being pathological in one (2%) GC. A genetic analysis was performed if clinical criteria of hereditary syndrome were fulfilled, identifying a mutation in 10/22 (45.5%) families [7/16 (43.7%) with GC and 3/6 (50%) with PC] and 19 (24.7%) fulfilled criteria of familial cancer. Diagnosis of cancer <40 years and personal history of other cancers were independent risk factors of a hereditary syndrome [OR:11.3 (95%IC 1.9–67); p = 0.007 and OR:17.4 (95% IC 2.5–119.9); p = 0.004; respectively]. The selection of patients based on clinical criteria leads to high diagnostic yield, detecting a causative germline mutation in almost half of the cases; therefore, both meticulous genetic counseling and use of multi-gen panels is crucial.

Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop recommendations for management of patients with breast cancer (BC) with germline mutations in BC susceptibility genes.

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology convened an Expert Panel to develop recommendations based on a systematic review of the literature and a formal consensus process.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight articles met eligibility criteria and formed the evidentiary basis for the local therapy recommendations; six randomized controlled trials of systemic therapy met eligibility criteria.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients with newly diagnosed BC and BRCA1/2 mutations may be considered for breast-conserving therapy (BCT), with local control of the index cancer similar to that of noncarriers. The significant risk of a contralateral BC (CBC), especially in young women, and the higher risk of new cancers in the ipsilateral breast warrant discussion of bilateral mastectomy. Patients with mutations in moderate-risk genes should be offered BCT. For women with mutations in BRCA1/2 or moderate-penetrance genes who are eligible for mastectomy, nipple-sparing mastectomy is a reasonable approach. There is no evidence of increased toxicity or CBC events from radiation exposure in BRCA1/2 carriers. Radiation therapy should not be withheld in ATM carriers. For patients with germline TP53 mutations, mastectomy is advised; radiation therapy is contraindicated except in those with significant risk of locoregional recurrence. Platinum agents are recommended versus taxanes to treat advanced BC in BRCA carriers. In the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting, data do not support the routine addition of platinum to anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (olaparib and talazoparib) are preferable to nonplatinum single-agent chemotherapy for treatment of advanced BC in BRCA1/2 carriers. Data are insufficient to recommend PARP inhibitor use in the early setting or in moderate-penetrance carriers. Additional information available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.

[MUTYH-associated polyposis: Review and update of the French recommendations established in 2012 under the auspices of the National Cancer Institute (INCa)]

MUTYH-associated polyposis (MUTYH-associated polyposis, MAP) is an autosomal recessive inheritance disorder related to bi-allelic constitutional pathogenic variants of the MUTYH gene which was first described in 2002. In 2011, a group of French experts composed of clinicians and biologists, performed a summary of the available data on this condition and drew up recommendations concerning the indications and the modalities of molecular analysis of the MUTYH gene in index cases and their relatives, as well as the management of affected individuals. In view of recent developments, some recommendations have become obsolete, in particular with regard to the molecular analysis strategy since MUTYH gene has been recently included in a consensus panel of 14 genes predisposing to colorectal cancer. This led us to revise all the points of the previous expertise. We report here the revised version of this work which successively considers the phenotype and the tumor risks associated with this genotype, the differential diagnoses, the indication criteria and the strategy of the molecular analysis and the recommendations for the management of affected individuals. We also discuss the phenotype and the tumor risks associated with mono-allelic pathogenic variants of MUTYH gene.

Hereditary gastric cancer: Three rules to reduce missed diagnoses

Gastric cancer remains one of the most lethal cancers. The incidence and mortality rates are quite similar. The main reason for the high mortality is diagnosis at advanced stages of disease, when treatment options are poor. One of the supposed strategies to overcome late-stage diagnosis is identifying people at high risk with the aim of establishing rigorous clinical control, including routine endoscopy and biopsies. Hereditary gastric cancer (HGC) syndromes, though representing a sizeable group to monitor for prevention or, at least, for early diagnosis, are apparently extremely rare. The low rate of HGC diagnosis might be related to the low rates of suspicion, insufficient familiarity about clinical diagnosis criteria, and the supposed conditional necessity of a molecular diagnosis. In this review, we will discuss simple measures to increase HGC diagnosis by applying three rules that might provide an opportunity for precision care to benefit the families affected by this disease.

Clinical Factors Associated With Gastric Cancer in Individuals With Lynch Syndrome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Lynch syndrome is the most common inherited cause of gastrointestinal cancer and increases risk for a variety of malignancies, including gastric cancer. We aimed to identify clinical factors associated with gastric cancer in carriers of germline variants causing Lynch syndrome.

METHODS

We collected data from 52,758 consecutive individuals tested for genetic variants associated with Lynch syndrome from June 2006 through July 2013 at a commercial laboratory. We obtained clinical and demographic data, as well as information on personal and family histories of cancer (first- and second-degree relatives) from forms completed by ordering providers. We performed multivariate logistic regression to identify clinical factors associated with gastric cancer in carriers of mutations that cause Lynch syndrome (pathogenic mutations).

RESULTS

After we excluded individuals with missing clinical data (n = 1664) or with multiple pathogenic mutations (n = 8), we analyzed data from 51,086 individuals. Of these, 3828 persons carried pathogenic mutations (1346 with mutations in MLH1, 1639 with mutations in MSH2, 670 with mutations in MSH6, 145 with mutations in PMS2, and 28 with mutations in EPCAM). Of the 3828 carriers of pathogenic mutations, 41 (1.1%) had a previous gastric cancer and 350 (9.1%) had 1 or more first- or second-degree relatives with gastric cancer. In multivariate analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.82; 95% CI, 1.48-5.38), older age (OR, 2.07 per 10 years; 95% CI, 1.64-2.61), mutations in MLH1 (OR, 6.53; 95% CI, 1.50-28.42) or MSH2 (OR, 5.23 compared to mutations in MSH6, PMS2, or EPCAM; 95% CI, 1.21-22.71), and number of first-degree relatives with gastric cancer (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.42-4.45), but not second-degree relatives (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.40-3.18) were independently associated with gastric cancer among carriers of pathogenic mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of data from almost 4000 carriers of Lynch syndrome-associated mutations, we found history of gastric cancer to be independently associated with male sex, older age, mutations in MLH1 or MSH2, and number of first-degree relatives with gastric cancer. These findings suggest that personalized, risk-stratified approaches to gastric cancer surveillance may be appropriate for individuals with Lynch syndrome-associated mutations.

Familial Pancreatic Cancer: Current Perspectives

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a highly lethal disease, mostly incurable when detected. Thus, despite advances in PC treatments, only around 7% of patients survive 5-years after diagnosis. This morbid outcome is secondary to multifactorial reasons, such as late-stage diagnosis, rapid progression and minimal response to chemotherapy. Based on these factors, it is of special relevance to identify PC high-risk individuals in order to establish preventive and early detection measures. Although most PC are sporadic, approximately 10% cases have a familial basis. No main causative gene of PC has been identified but several known germline pathogenic mutations are related with an increased risk of this tumor. These inherited cancer syndromes represent 3% of all PC. On the other hand, in 7% of cases of PC, there is a strong family history without a causative germline mutation, a situation known as familial pancreatic cancer (FPC). In recent years, there is increasing evidence supporting the benefit of genetic germline analysis in PC patients, and periodic pancreatic screening in PC high-risk patients (mainly those with a lifetime risk greater than 5%), although there is no general agreement in the group of patients and individuals to study and screen. In the present review, we expose an update in the field of hereditary and FPC, with the aim of describing the current strategies and implications in genetic counseling, surveillance and therapeutic interventions.