1
|
Bloem M, van Not OJ, Aarts MJB, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Blank CU, Blokx WAM, Boers-Sonderen MJ, Bonenkamp JJ, de Groot JWB, Haanen JB, Hospers GAP, Kapiteijn EW, de Meza MM, Piersma D, van Rijn RS, Stevense-den Boer MAM, van der Veldt AAM, Vreugdenhil G, van den Eertwegh AJM, Suijkerbuijk KPM, Wouters MWJM. Adjuvant treatment with anti-PD-1 in acral melanoma: A nationwide study. Int J Cancer 2024; 155:1455-1465. [PMID: 38922879 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.35060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Previous studies demonstrated limited efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable acral melanoma (AM); it remains unclear how this translates to the adjuvant setting. This study investigates clinical outcomes of acral compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 after complete resection. All stages III-IV AM and CM patients receiving adjuvant anti-PD-1 after complete resection between 2018 and 2022 were included from the prospective nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. We analyzed recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). A multivariable Cox regression analysis of RFS was performed to adjust for potential confounders. We included 1958 (86 AM and 1872 CM) patients. At baseline, AM patients more frequently had KIT mutations, higher disease stages, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, and fewer BRAF and NRAS mutations. Median RFS was 14.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.5-29.3) in AM and 37.4 months (95% CI: 34.6 to not reached) in CM (p = .002). After correcting for potential confounders, AM remained associated with a higher risk of recurrence (HRadj 1.53; 95% CI: 1.07-2.17; p = .019). Two-year DMFS tended to be worse for AM than for CM: 64.5% versus 79.7% (p = .050). Two-year OS was significantly lower in AM (71.5% vs. 84.3%; p = .027). The results of this study suggest a poorer outcome of adjuvant-treated AM compared to CM. Studies assessing the added value of adjuvant treatment in AM are needed. Future research should investigate alternative treatment strategies to improve outcomes of high-risk AM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manja Bloem
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier J van Not
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen J B Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christian U Blank
- Department of Medical Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willeke A M Blokx
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marye J Boers-Sonderen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes J Bonenkamp
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - John B Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen W Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Melissa M de Meza
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Djura Piersma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rozemarijn S van Rijn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Vreugdenhil
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons J M van den Eertwegh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Janka EA, Szabó IL, Kollár S, Toka-Farkas T, Ványai B, Várvölgyi T, Kapitány A, Shabu H, Szegedi A, Emri G. Prognostic Role of Clinicopathological Characteristics and Serum Markers in Metastatic Melanoma Patients Treated with BRAF and MEK Inhibitors. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2981. [PMID: 39272837 PMCID: PMC11393897 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16172981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2024] [Revised: 08/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Prognostic studies can provide important information about disease biology and improve the use of biomarkers to optimize treatment decisions. METHODS A total of 199 patients with advanced melanoma treated with BRAF + MEK inhibitors were included in our single-center retrospective study. We analyzed the risk of progression and death using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. The predictive effect of prognostic factors on progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated in ROC analysis. RESULTS We found that primary tumor localization, Clark level, pT category, baseline M stage and baseline serum S100B are independent and significant prognostic factors for PFS. The discriminative power of the combination of these factors was excellent for predicting 18 month PFS (AUC 0.822 [95% CI 0.727; 0.916], p < 0.001). Primary tumor localization on the extremities, Clark level V, baseline M1c stage or M1d stage, and elevated baseline serum S100B and LDH levels were independently and significantly associated with unfavorable overall survival (OS). CONCLUSION Baseline M stage and serum S100B appear to be independent prognostic factors for both PFS and OS in melanoma patients treated with BRAF + MEK inhibitors. We newly identified significant and independent prognostic effects of primary tumor localization and Clark level on survival that warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eszter Anna Janka
- Department of Dermatology, MTA Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
- HUN-REN-UD Allergology Research Group, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Imre Lőrinc Szabó
- Department of Dermatology, MTA Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
- HUN-REN-UD Allergology Research Group, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Sándor Kollár
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
- Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Tünde Toka-Farkas
- Department of Dermatology, MTA Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Beatrix Ványai
- Department of Dermatology, MTA Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Tünde Várvölgyi
- Department of Dermatology, MTA Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Anikó Kapitány
- Department of Dermatology, MTA Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
- HUN-REN-UD Allergology Research Group, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Hibah Shabu
- Department of Dermatology, MTA Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Andrea Szegedi
- Department of Dermatology, MTA Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
- HUN-REN-UD Allergology Research Group, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Gabriella Emri
- Department of Dermatology, MTA Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
- HUN-REN-UD Allergology Research Group, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Not OJ, van den Eertwegh AJM, Jalving H, Bloem M, Haanen JB, van Rijn RS, Aarts MJB, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Blank CU, Boers-Sonderen MJ, de Groot J W B JW, Hospers GAP, Kapiteijn E, Leeneman B, D P, Stevense-den Boer M, van der Veldt AAM, Vreugdenhil G G, Wouters MWJM, Blokx WAM, Suijkerbuijk KPM. Long-Term Survival in Patients With Advanced Melanoma. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2426641. [PMID: 39141388 PMCID: PMC11325208 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Long-term survival data from clinical trials show that survival curves of patients with advanced melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) gradually reach a plateau, suggesting that patients have a chance of achieving long-term survival. OBJECTIVE To investigate long-term survival in patients with advanced melanoma treated with ICIs outside clinical trials. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cohort study using prospectively collected data from the nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry, including patients in the Netherlands with advanced melanoma treated with first-line ICIs from 2012 to 2019. Data were analyzed from January to September 2023. EXPOSURES Patients were treated with first-line ipilimumab-nivolumab, antibodies that target programmed cell death (anti-PD-1), or ipilimumab. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Progression-free survival (PFS) and melanoma-specific survival were analyzed, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate factors associated with PFS after reaching partial response (PR) or complete response (CR). RESULTS A total of 2490 patients treated with first-line ICIs were included (median [IQR] age, 65.0 [55.3-73.0] years; 1561 male patients [62.7%]). Most patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 1 or lower (2202 patients [88.5%]) and normal lactate dehydrogenase levels (1715 patients [68.9%]). PFS for all patients was 23.4% (95% CI, 21.7%-25.2%) after 3 years and 19.7% (95% CI, 18.0%-21.4%) after 5 years. Overall survival for all patients was 44.0% (95% CI, 42.1%-46.1%) after 3 years and 35.9% (95% CI, 33.9%-38.0%) after 5 years. Patients with metastases in 3 or more organ sites had a significantly higher hazard of progression after reaching PR or CR (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.11-1.69). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study of patients with advanced melanoma treated with ICIs in clinical practice showed that their survival reached a plateau, comparable with patients participating in clinical trials. These findings can be used in daily clinical practice to guide long-term surveillance strategies and inform both physicians and patients regarding long-term treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier J van Not
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Alfons J M van den Eertwegh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hilde Jalving
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Manja Bloem
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John B Haanen
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rozemarijn S van Rijn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Maureen J B Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Christian U Blank
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marye J Boers-Sonderen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Brenda Leeneman
- Department of Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Erasmus Center for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Piersma D
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerard Vreugdenhil G
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Willeke A M Blokx
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Castanares-Zapatero D, Verleye L, Devos C, Thiry N, Silversmit G, Van Damme N, De Gendt C, Hulstaert F, Neyt M. Survival of patients with unfavorable prognosis cutaneous melanoma with increased use of immunotherapy agents: a population-based study in Belgium. Int J Dermatol 2024; 63:947-955. [PMID: 38297428 DOI: 10.1111/ijd.17046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although metastatic cutaneous melanoma is associated with an unfavorable prognosis, innovative therapies including immunomodulating agents and targeted therapies have shown survival benefits in clinical trials. We assessed the impact of the introduction of innovative drugs into clinical practice on the survival of patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma during the period 2004-2017, in Belgium. The evolution of associated expenses was also analyzed. METHODS This is a retrospective population-based study using data from the national Belgian Cancer Registry, compulsory health insurance, and administrative survival data. The immunomodulating drugs were ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, while targeted therapies included vemurafenib, dabrafenib and trametinib. RESULTS We did not identify a trend for improvement over time. Median survival (years) was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.1-1.8) in 2004-2008, 1.1 (95% CI: 0.8-1.5) in 2009-2013, and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.3-2.4) in 2014-2017, respectively. In contrast, survival improved in those with unknown primary tumor localization. In this group, median survival time was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.4-2.9) in the most recent period, while it was 1.1 (95% CI: 0.7-1.3) in 2009-2013, and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.6-1.2) in 2004-2008. The uptake of innovative drugs remained modest, with no drug being used by more than 30% of patients. Yearly expenditure was almost non-existent, and gradually increased, reaching several million euros in 2014-2017. CONCLUSION Patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 showed no apparent improvement in survival. In contrast, increased survival was observed in the subgroup of patients with unknown primary tumor localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leen Verleye
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Carl Devos
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nancy Thiry
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Frank Hulstaert
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mattias Neyt
- Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Not OJ, van den Eertwegh AJ, Haanen JB, Blank CU, Aarts MJ, van Breeschoten J, van den Berkmortel FW, de Groot JWB, Hospers GA, Ismail RK, Kapiteijn E, Bloem M, De Meza MM, Piersma D, van Rijn RS, Stevense-den Boer MA, van der Veldt AA, Vreugdenhil G, Boers-Sonderen MJ, Blokx WA, Wouters MW, Suijkerbuijk KP. Improving survival in advanced melanoma patients: a trend analysis from 2013 to 2021. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 69:102485. [PMID: 38370537 PMCID: PMC10874714 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The prognosis of advanced melanoma patients has significantly improved over the years. We aimed to evaluate the survival per year of diagnosis. Methods All systemically treated patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma from 2013 to 2021 were included from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. Baseline characteristics and overall survival (OS) were compared between the different years of diagnosis. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the association between year of diagnosis and OS. Findings For this cohort study, we included 6260 systemically treated advanced melanoma patients. At baseline, there was an increase over the years in age, the percentage of patients with an ECOG PS ≥ 2, with brain metastases, and a synchronous diagnosis of primary and unresectable melanoma. Median OS increased from 11.2 months (95% CI 10.0-12.4) for patients diagnosed in 2013 to 32.0 months (95% CI 26.6-36.7) for patients diagnosed in 2019. Median OS was remarkably lower for patients diagnosed in 2020 (26.6 months; 95% CI 23.9-35.1) and 2021 (24.0 months; 95% CI 20.4-NR). Patients diagnosed in 2020 and 2021 had a higher hazard of death compared to patients diagnosed in 2019, although this was not significant. The multivariable Cox regression showed a lower hazard of death for the years of diagnosis after 2013. In contrast, patients diagnosed in 2020 and 2021 had a higher hazard of death compared to patients diagnosed in 2019. Interpretation After a continuous survival improvement for advanced melanoma patients between 2013 and 2019, outcomes of patients diagnosed in 2020 and 2021 seem poorer. This trend of decreased survival remained after correcting for known prognostic factors and previous neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment, suggesting that it is explained by unmeasured factors, which-considering the timing-could be COVID-19-related. Funding For the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry (DMTR), the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing foundation received a start-up grant from governmental organization The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW, project number 836002002). The DMTR is structurally funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, and Roche Pharma. Roche Pharma stopped funding in 2019, and Pierre Fabre started funding the DMTR in 2019. For this work, no funding was granted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier J. van Not
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, Leiden 2333AA, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584CX, the Netherlands
| | - Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam 1081HZ, the Netherlands
| | - John B. Haanen
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Christian U. Blank
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Maureen J.B. Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht 6229 HX, the Netherlands
| | - Jesper van Breeschoten
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, Leiden 2333AA, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam 1081HZ, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Geke A.P. Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen 9713GZ, the Netherlands
| | - Rawa K. Ismail
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, Leiden 2333AA, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2333ZA, the Netherlands
| | - Manja Bloem
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, Leiden 2333AA, the Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Einthovenweg 20, Leiden 2333ZC, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Melissa M. De Meza
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, Leiden 2333AA, the Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Einthovenweg 20, Leiden 2333ZC, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Djura Piersma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Koningsplein 1, Enschede 7512KZ, the Netherlands
| | - Rozemarijn S. van Rijn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, Leeuwarden 8934AD, the Netherlands
| | | | - Astrid A.M. van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, ‘s-Gravendijkwal 230, Rotterdam 3015CE, the Netherlands
| | - Gerard Vreugdenhil
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maxima Medical Centre, De Run 4600, Eindhoven 5504DB, the Netherlands
| | - Marye J. Boers-Sonderen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen 6525GA, the Netherlands
| | - Willeke A.M. Blokx
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584CX, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Michel W.J.M. Wouters
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, Leiden 2333AA, the Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Einthovenweg 20, Leiden 2333ZC, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, the Netherlands
| | - Karijn P.M. Suijkerbuijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584CX, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Reitmajer M, Leiter U, Nanz L, Amaral T, Flatz L, Garbe C, Forschner A. Long-term survival of stage IV melanoma patients: evaluation on 640 melanoma patients entering stage IV between 2014 and 2017. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:15. [PMID: 38238578 PMCID: PMC10796594 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05533-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Since the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies (TT), survival rates of metastatic melanoma patients have increased significantly and complete remissions are no longer rarities. Consequently, there is an increasing number of long-term survivors who have not yet been comprehensively characterized. METHODS We included melanoma patients who entered stage IV between 2014 and 2017 and survived at least 5 years after entering stage IV. Descriptive statistics were performed to characterize the applied systemic therapies, response rates and to report which of these patients are still alive today. RESULTS 640 patients entered stage IV at the University Hospital Tuebingen. Of these, 207 patients (32%) were still alive at least 5 years after entering stage IV. Details of applied therapies and response rates were available in 176 patients (85%). About 90% of patients (n = 159) were still alive at the time of analysis. Median survival since first stage IV diagnosis was 6.0 years (range 5-9 years). An impressive majority of patients (n = 146, 83%) were no longer receiving systemic therapy at the time of evaluation. Complete remission under first line systemic therapy was seen in 36% of the patients. CONCLUSION This dataset comprises the largest available cohort of long-term surviving stage IV melanoma patients. Since 90% of patients in our cohort are still alive today, we expect an increasing number of long-term survivors in the future. Our data indicate the need for specific follow-up programs addressing the needs of long-term survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Reitmajer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstraße 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstraße 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Lena Nanz
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstraße 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Teresa Amaral
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstraße 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Lukas Flatz
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstraße 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Claus Garbe
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstraße 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstraße 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schina A, Pedersen S, Spenning AL, Laursen OK, Pedersen C, Haslund CA, Schmidt H, Bastholt L, Svane IM, Ellebaek E, Donia M. Sustained improved survival of patients with metastatic melanoma after the introduction of anti-PD-1-based therapies. Eur J Cancer 2023; 195:113392. [PMID: 37924648 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of modern therapies improved the median survival of patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). Here, we determined the real-world impact of modern treatments on the long-term survival of MM. METHODS In a population-based study, we extracted all cases of MM diagnosed in four non-consecutive years marked by major changes in available 1st line treatments (2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018) from the Danish MM Database. Patients were grouped into "trial-like" and "trial-excluded" based on common trial eligibility criteria. RESULTS We observed a sustained improved survival of "trial-like" patients diagnosed in 2016 or in 2018, compared to 2012 or 2014, but no major differences in 2018 versus 2016. In contrast, while survival of "trial-excluded" patients in 2016 was better compared to 2014 and 2012, survival in 2018 was improved over all previous years. We then developed a prognostic model based on multivariable stratified Cox regression, to predict the survival of newly diagnosed MM patients. Internal validation showed excellent discrimination and calibration, with a time-area-under-the-curve above 0.79 at multiple time horizons, for up to four years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS The introduction of modern treatments such as anti-PD-1 has led to a sustained, improved survival of real-world patients with MM, regardless of their eligibility for clinical trials. We provide an updateable prognostic model that can be used to improve patient information. Overall, these data highlight a positive population-based impact of modern treatments and can help health technology assessment agencies worldwide to evaluate the appropriateness of drug pricing based on known cost-benefit data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimilia Schina
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Sidsel Pedersen
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | | | | | - Cecilia Pedersen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Henrik Schmidt
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Inge Marie Svane
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Eva Ellebaek
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Marco Donia
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Van Not OJ, van den Eertwegh AJM, Haanen JB, van Rijn RS, Aarts MJB, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Blank CU, Boers-Sonderen MJ, van Eijs MJM, de Groot JWB, Hospers GAP, Kapiteijn E, de Meza M, Piersma D, Stevense-den Boer M, van der Veldt AAM, Vreugdenhil G, Wouters MWJM, Suijkerbuijk KPM, Blokx WAM. Response to checkpoint inhibition and targeted therapy in melanoma patients with concurrent haematological malignancies. Eur J Cancer 2023; 186:27-37. [PMID: 37023588 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients diagnosed with haematologic malignancies (HMs) have a higher risk of developing subsequent solid tumours, such as melanoma. Patients with HM were mostly excluded from clinical trials but potentially derive less benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) due to disease- or treatment-related T- or B-cell dysfunction. METHODS All advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1-based treatment or targeted therapy between 2015 and 2021 were included from the prospective nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. Progression-free survival (PFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were analysed for patients with HM (HM+) and without HM (HM-). A cox model was used to account for confounders associated with PFS and MSS. RESULTS In total, 4638 advanced melanoma patients received first-line anti-PD-1 monotherapy (n = 1763), ipilimumab-nivolumab (n = 800), or BRAF(/MEK) inhibitors (n = 2075). Concurrent HMs were present for 46 anti-PD1-treated patients, 11 ipilimumab-nivolumab-treated patients and 43 BRAF(/MEK)-inhibitor-treated patients. In anti-PD-1-treated patients, the median PFS was 2.8 months for HM+ and 9.9 months for HM- (p = 0.01). MSS was 41.2 months for HM+ and 58.1 months for HM- (p = 0.00086). In multivariable analysis, the presence of an HM was significantly associated with higher risk of melanoma progression (HRadj 1.62; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.15-2.29; p = 0.006) and melanoma-related death (HRadj 1.74; 95% CI 1.09-2.78; p = 0.020). Median PFS and MSS for first-line BRAF(/MEK-) inhibitor-treated HM+ and HM- patients were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS Patients with HM and advanced melanoma show significantly worse melanoma-related outcomes when treated with ICI, but not targeted therapy, compared to patients without HM. Clinicians should be aware of potentially altered effectiveness of ICI in patients with active HM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier J Van Not
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, Leiden 2333AA, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584CX, The Netherlands.
| | - Alfons J M van den Eertwegh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam 1081HZ, The Netherlands
| | - John B Haanen
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - Rozemarijn S van Rijn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, Leeuwarden 8934AD, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen J B Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht 6229 HX, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christian U Blank
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - Marye J Boers-Sonderen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen 6525GA, The Netherlands
| | - Mick J M van Eijs
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584CX, The Netherlands; Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht 3584EA, The Netherlands
| | | | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen 9713GZ, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2333ZA, The Netherlands
| | - Melissa de Meza
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, Leiden 2333AA, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Einthovenweg 20, Leiden 2333ZC, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - Djura Piersma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Koningsplein 1, Enschede 7512KZ, The Netherlands
| | | | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, Rotterdam 3015CE, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Vreugdenhil
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maxima Medical Centre, De Run 4600, Eindhoven 5504DB, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Rijnsburgerweg 10, Leiden 2333AA, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Einthovenweg 20, Leiden 2333ZC, The Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584CX, The Netherlands
| | - Willeke A M Blokx
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584CX, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gaydina TA, Dvornikov AS, Patsap OI, Tairova RT, Lange DA. PRIMARY MULTIPLE MALIGNANT SKIN TUMORS: MELANOMA AND BASAL CELL CARCINOMA. VESTNIK DERMATOLOGII I VENEROLOGII 2023. [DOI: 10.25208/vdv1415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of skin melanoma in the world is growing every year. Despite advances in diagnostics, the identification of the primary focus of melanoma in some cases is still difficult. The natural course sometimes manifests only with the appearance of melanoma metastases, which can mimic other diseases. Patient S., 52 years old, was admitted to the FCBRN of FMBA of Russia with complaints on periodic systemic dizziness, headaches of a pressing nature, episodes of speech impairment over the past three months. According to the brain MRI-scan results, a volumetric formation of the left frontal lobe was revealed. Upon examination, two non-pigmented lesions were found on the skin of the scalp and forehead. Due to the presence of focal neurological symptoms, it was decided to remove the brain tumor using neurophysiological monitoring and the scalp skin lesion, with histological verification. Morphological diagnosis of the removed brain tumor was a metastasis of amelanotic epithelioid melanoma. The skin lesion was basal cell carcinoma. Thus, the patient had primarily multiple malignant tumors: metastatic melanoma and basal cell carcinoma. The primary focus of melanoma could not be identified by available noninvasive research methods. The patient was referred to an oncologist to decide on the tactics of further examination and treatment. To date, the patient has been treated according to the scheme sh0876 1 line 1 course of pembrolizumab 400mg IV, cycle 42 days.
Collapse
|
10
|
van Duin IAJ, Elias SG, van den Eertwegh AJM, de Groot JWB, Blokx WAM, van Diest PJ, Leiner T, Verhoeff JJC, Verheijden RJ, van Not OJ, Aarts MJB, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, Blank CU, Haanen JBAG, Hospers GAP, Kamphuis AM, Piersma D, van Rijn RS, van der Veldt AAM, Vreugdenhil G, Wouters MWJM, Stevense-den Boer MAM, Boers-Sonderen MJ, Kapiteijn E, Suijkerbuijk KPM. Time interval from primary melanoma to first distant recurrence in relation to patient outcomes in advanced melanoma. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:2493-2502. [PMID: 36843274 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2023]
Abstract
Since the introduction of BRAF(/MEK) inhibition and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), the prognosis of advanced melanoma has greatly improved. Melanoma is known for its remarkably long time to first distant recurrence (TFDR), which can be decades in some patients and is partly attributed to immune-surveillance. We investigated the relationship between TFDR and patient outcomes after systemic treatment for advanced melanoma. We selected patients undergoing first-line systemic therapy for advanced melanoma from the nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. The association between TFDR and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed by Cox proportional hazard regression models. The TFDR was modeled categorically, linearly, and flexibly using restricted cubic splines. Patients received anti-PD-1-based treatment (n = 1844) or BRAF(/MEK) inhibition (n = 1618). For ICI-treated patients with a TFDR <2 years, median OS was 25.0 months, compared to 37.3 months for a TFDR >5 years (P = .014). Patients treated with BRAF(/MEK) inhibition with a longer TFDR also had a significantly longer median OS (8.6 months for TFDR <2 years compared to 11.1 months for >5 years, P = .004). The hazard of dying rapidly decreased with increasing TFDR until approximately 5 years (HR 0.87), after which the hazard of dying further decreased with increasing TFDR, but less strongly (HR 0.82 for a TFDR of 10 years and HR 0.79 for a TFDR of 15 years). Results were similar when stratifying for type of treatment. Advanced melanoma patients with longer TFDR have a prolonged PFS and OS, irrespective of being treated with first-line ICI or targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella A J van Duin
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alfonsus J M van den Eertwegh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Willeke A M Blokx
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tim Leiner
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J C Verhoeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rik J Verheijden
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier J van Not
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen J B Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christian U Blank
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John B A G Haanen
- Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M Kamphuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Djura Piersma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rozemarijn S van Rijn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Vreugdenhil
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marye J Boers-Sonderen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
ter Maat L, van Duin IA, Elias SG, Leiner T, Verhoeff JJ, Arntz ER, Troenokarso MF, Blokx WA, Isgum I, de Wit GA, van den Berkmortel FW, Boers-Sonderen MJ, Boomsma MF, van den Eertwegh FJ, de Groot JWB, Piersma D, Vreugdenhil A, Westgeest HM, Kapiteijn E, van Diest PJ, Pluim J, de Jong PA, Suijkerbuijk KP, Veta M. CT radiomics compared to a clinical model for predicting checkpoint inhibitor treatment outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2023; 185:167-177. [PMID: 36996627 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Predicting checkpoint inhibitors treatment outcomes in melanoma is a relevant task, due to the unpredictable and potentially fatal toxicity and high costs for society. However, accurate biomarkers for treatment outcomes are lacking. Radiomics are a technique to quantitatively capture tumour characteristics on readily available computed tomography (CT) imaging. The purpose of this study was to investigate the added value of radiomics for predicting clinical benefit from checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma in a large, multicenter cohort. METHODS Patients who received first-line anti-PD1±anti-CTLA4 treatment for advanced cutaneous melanoma were retrospectively identified from nine participating hospitals. For every patient, up to five representative lesions were segmented on baseline CT, and radiomics features were extracted. A machine learning pipeline was trained on the radiomics features to predict clinical benefit, defined as stable disease for more than 6 months or response per RECIST 1.1 criteria. This approach was evaluated using a leave-one-centre-out cross validation and compared to a model based on previously discovered clinical predictors. Lastly, a combination model was built on the radiomics and clinical model. RESULTS A total of 620 patients were included, of which 59.2% experienced clinical benefit. The radiomics model achieved an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.607 [95% CI, 0.562-0.652], lower than that of the clinical model (AUROC=0.646 [95% CI, 0.600-0.692]). The combination model yielded no improvement over the clinical model in terms of discrimination (AUROC=0.636 [95% CI, 0.592-0.680]) or calibration. The output of the radiomics model was significantly correlated with three out of five input variables of the clinical model (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION The radiomics model achieved a moderate predictive value of clinical benefit, which was statistically significant. However, a radiomics approach was unable to add value to a simpler clinical model, most likely due to the overlap in predictive information learned by both models. Future research should focus on the application of deep learning, spectral CT-derived radiomics, and a multimodal approach for accurately predicting benefit to checkpoint inhibitor treatment in advanced melanoma.
Collapse
|
12
|
Schweighofer-Zwink G, Manafi-Farid R, Kölblinger P, Hehenwarter L, Harsini S, Pirich C, Beheshti M. Prognostic value of 2-[ 18F]FDG PET-CT in metastatic melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy. Eur J Radiol 2021; 146:110107. [PMID: 34922117 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The 2-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (2-[18F]FDG PET/CT) is used for the evaluation of response to immunotherapy in malignant melanoma. Here, we evaluated the prognostic value of various metabolic parameters in baseline and different time points after therapy. METHODS In this retrospective study, 51 metastatic melanoma patients, who had received immunotherapy, were included. Patients with baseline and two follow-up 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT studies (3 and 6 months after therapy) were selected. Multiple metabolic parameters and tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) were extracted and correlated with OS. RESULTS The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 49% and 43.1%, respectively. On baseline 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT, only standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SULmax and SULpeak), as well as most of the TBRs were predictive for 3- and 5-year OS rates. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and most of the TBRs were predictive on both follow-up studies. Also, the changes in values of MTV, TLG and most of the TBRs from the baseline to the 3-month and 6- month follow-up studies were prognostic. On multivariate analysis, all of the most predictive parameters for OS were derived from the 3-month follow-up study. The ratio of TBRmean to the mediastinum was the best factor (cutoff value of 2.15, sensitivity of 88.5% and specificity of 68.0% for 3-year survival). CONCLUSION Metabolic parameters derived from 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT are valuable tools for the prediction of 3- and 5-year OS rates in metastatic melanoma patients undergoing immunotherapy. The 3-month follow-up 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT is of particular importance in this regard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor Schweighofer-Zwink
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Reyhaneh Manafi-Farid
- Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical sciences, 1411713135 Tehran, Iran
| | - Peter Kölblinger
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Lukas Hehenwarter
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Sara Harsini
- Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical sciences, 1411713135 Tehran, Iran; Association of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (ANMMI), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), 1419733151 Tehran, Iran
| | - Christian Pirich
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Suijkerbuijk KPM, Haanen JBAG, Boers-Sonderen MJ, Hospers GAP, Blank CU, van den Berkmortel FWPJ, de Groot JWB, Piersma D, Aarts MJB, van Rijn RS, Vreugdenhil G, Westgeest HM, Kapiteijn E, van der Veldt AAM, van den Eertwegh AJM. Survival of stage IV melanoma in Belgium and the Netherlands. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 36:e118-e119. [PMID: 34536304 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- K P M Suijkerbuijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J B A G Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J Boers-Sonderen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - C U Blank
- Department of Medical Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - D Piersma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - M J B Aarts
- Department of Medical Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R S van Rijn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - G Vreugdenhil
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - H M Westgeest
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - E Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A A M van der Veldt
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A J M van den Eertwegh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Giugliano F, Crimini E, Tarantino P, Zagami P, Uliano J, Corti C, Trapani D, Curigliano G, Ascierto PA. First line treatment of BRAF mutated advanced melanoma: Does one size fit all? Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 99:102253. [PMID: 34186441 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
In the last decade, immunotherapy and target therapy have revolutionized the prognosis of patients with BRAF-V600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. To date, three different combinations of BRAF/MEK inhibitors have been approved for this population, showing comparable efficacy and unique toxicity profiles. Several immune-checkpoint inhibitors, including pembrolizumab, nivolumab and the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab, are also available options for untreated metastatic melanoma patients. A novel approach has emerged by combining immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents, based on preclinical hints of synergy, prompting clinical results from large randomized trials. Specifically, the triplet of atezolizumab, vemurafenib and cobimetinib has been recently approved by FDA for patients with untreated BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. With a wide variety of available treatment options in this setting, it is paramount to establish criteria to select the most effective and safe frontline tailored approaches, for each patient. Results from ongoing studies are awaited, to maximise the benefits in survival outcomes and quality of life for patients, balancing adverse events and clinical benefit. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current landscape of standard and experimental treatment strategies for the first line treatment of patients with BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma and discuss the best patient-centered tailored strategies in the first-line setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Giugliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Crimini
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Tarantino
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Zagami
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Jacopo Uliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Corti
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Toxicity, Response and Survival in Older Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Checkpoint Inhibitors. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112826. [PMID: 34198950 PMCID: PMC8201158 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Trials suggest no differences in immunotherapy treatment between older and younger patients, but mainly young patients with a good performance status were included in these trials. The aim of this study was to describe the treatment patterns and outcomes of “real-world” older patients with metastatic melanoma. We included 2216 patients aged ≥65 years from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry and described outcomes of immunotherapy. The study showed that responses and severe side effects did not differ from previously reported younger populations and randomized trials, even in the oldest patients and in patients with other diseases. However, patients aged ≥75 discontinued treatment due to toxicity more often, resulting in fewer treatment cycles. We therefore conclude that immunotherapy seems to have similar effects in older patients compared to younger patients, but the impact of less severe toxicity on quality of life should be further studied as older patients are more likely to discontinue treatment. Abstract Background: Previous trials suggest no differences in immunotherapy treatment between older and younger patients, but mainly young patients with a good performance status were included. The aim of this study was to describe the treatment patterns and outcomes of “real-world” older patients with metastatic melanoma and to identify predictors of outcome. Methods: We included patients aged ≥65 years with metastatic melanoma from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. We described the reasons for hospital admissions and treatment discontinuation. Additionally, we assessed predictors of toxicity and response using logistic regression models and survival using Cox regression models. Results: We included 2216 patients. Grade ≥3 toxicity was not associated with age, comorbidities or WHO status. Patients aged ≥75 discontinued treatment due to toxicity more often, resulting in fewer treatment cycles. Response rates were similar to previous trials (40.3% and 43.6% in patients aged 65–75 and ≥75, respectively, for anti-PD1 treatment) and did not decrease with age or comorbidity. Melanoma-specific survival was not affected by age or comorbidity. Conclusion: Response rates and toxicity outcomes of checkpoint inhibitors did not change with increasing age or comorbidity. However, the impact of grade I-II toxicity on quality of life deserves further study as older patients discontinue treatment more frequently.
Collapse
|
16
|
Clinical outcome of patients with metastatic melanoma of unknown primary in the era of novel therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2021; 70:3123-3135. [PMID: 33774697 PMCID: PMC8505371 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-02871-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) is considered different from melanoma of known primary (MKP), and it is unclear whether these patients benefit equally from novel therapies. In the current study, characteristics and overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced and metastatic MUP and MKP were compared in the era of novel therapy. Patients were selected from the prospective nation-wide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry (DMTR). The following criteria were applied: diagnosis of stage IIIc unresectable or IV cutaneous MKP (cMKP) or MUP between July 2012 and July 2017 and treatment with immune checkpoint inhibition and/or targeted therapy. OS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The stratified multivariable Cox regression model was used for adjusted analysis. A total of 2706 patients were eligible including 2321 (85.8%) patients with cMKP and 385 (14.2%) with MUP. In comparative analysis, MUP patients more often presented with advanced and metastatic disease at primary diagnosis with poorer performance status, higher LDH, and central nervous system metastases. In crude analysis, median OS of cMKP or MUP patients was 12 months (interquartile range [IQR] 5 – 44) and 14 months (IQR 5 – not reached), respectively (P = 0.278). In adjusted analysis, OS in MUP patients was superior (hazard rate 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.58–0.85; P < 0.001). As compared to patients with advanced and metastatic cMKP, MUP patients have superior survival in adjusted analysis, but usually present with poorer prognostic characteristics. In crude analysis, OS was comparable indicating that patients with MUP benefit at least equally from treatment with novel therapies.
Collapse
|