1
|
González-López A. Technical note: Characteristics of the energy spread kernels of scattered radiation in an x-ray room. Med Phys 2023; 50:643-650. [PMID: 35908179 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the scattered radiation spectra inside an x-ray room for different scattering conditions. METHODS Monte Carlo simulations of an x-ray room using phantoms of different size, varying field sizes, and a range of mono-energetic beams were carried out. For each energy, the particle fluence spectrum of scattered photons was collected at different spherical zones to describe the radiation reaching the different boundaries of the x-ray room. The effect on the scattered spectrum of the room floor was also considered. RESULTS The scattered spectra for mono-energetic primary beams at a given spherical zone give rise to oriented energy spread kernels (OESKs) that can be used to calculate the scattered spectrum for any poly-energetic beam at that zone. Despite the large differences, which can be seen in the OESKs when the scattering conditions vary, an important invariance is also observed: the position of the broad scatter peak for a given primary energy and zone. CONCLUSIONS The result of breaking down the calculation of the scattered radiation spectrum into the different factors that influence it allows estimating the spectrum in a wide range of situations. The invariant position of the broad scatter peak can be used to estimate the highest energy of the scattered photons for a given primary energy and zone, which may determine radiation shielding needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio González-López
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca - IMIB, ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Budošová D, Horváthová M, Bárdyová Z, Balázs T. CURRENT TRENDS OF RADIATION PROTECTION EQUIPMENT IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2022; 198:554-559. [PMID: 36005965 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncac098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Interventional radiology represents subspecialty of radiology, which does not use imaging modalities only for diagnostics, but mostly for therapeutic purposes. Realisation of interventional procedures is done through X-rays, which replaces direct visual control done by interventional radiologist or cardiologist. For the targeted reduction of the radiation exposure, the interventional radiology staff use personal protective equipment. Usually, aprons with lead-equivalent are used, which provide protection for 75% of the radiosensitive organs. As the eye lens and thyroid gland belong to the radiosensitive organs, lead eyeglasses and thyroid collar are commonly used for their protection. Cap and gloves with lead-equivalent can be utilised as an additional personal protective equipment, that is commercially available. Innovative protection systems, such as mobile radiation protection cabin and suspended radiation protection, have been designed to ensure better radiation protection and safety. These systems provide the comfort for the interventional radiologists at work, while offering better protection against ionising radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darina Budošová
- Trnava University in Trnava, Faculty of Health Care and Social Work, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Univerzitné námestie 1, Trnava 918 43, Slovakia
| | - Martina Horváthová
- Trnava University in Trnava, Faculty of Health Care and Social Work, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Univerzitné námestie 1, Trnava 918 43, Slovakia
| | - Zuzana Bárdyová
- Trnava University in Trnava, Faculty of Health Care and Social Work, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Univerzitné námestie 1, Trnava 918 43, Slovakia
| | - Tibor Balázs
- CINRE s.r.o., Center for Interventional Neuroradiology and Endovascular Treatment, Tematínska 5/a, Bratislava 851 05, Slovakia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Radiation Eye Dose for Physicians in CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Biopsy. Tomography 2022; 8:438-446. [PMID: 35202201 PMCID: PMC8878526 DOI: 10.3390/tomography8010036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
It is important to evaluate the radiation eye dose (3 mm dose equivalent, Hp (3)) received by physicians during computed tomography fluoroscopy (CTF)-guided biopsy, as physicians are close to the source of scattered radiation. In this study, we measured the radiation eye dose in Hp (3) received by one physician during CTF in a timeframe of 18 months using a direct eye dosimeter, the DOSIRISTM. The physician placed eye dosimeters above and under their lead (Pb) eyeglasses. We recorded the occupational radiation dose received using a neck dosimeter, gathered CT dose-related parameters (e.g., CT-fluoroscopic acquisition number, CT-fluoroscopic time, and CT-fluoroscopic mAs), and performed a total of 95 procedures during CTF-guided biopsies. We also estimated the eye dose (Hp (3)) received using neck personal dosimeters and CT dose-related parameters. The physician eye doses (right and left side) received in terms of Hp (3) without the use of Pb eyeglasses for 18 months were 2.25 and 2.06 mSv, respectively. The protective effect of the Pb eyeglasses (0.5 mm Pb) on the right and left sides during CTF procedures was 27.8 and 37.5%, respectively. This study proved the existence of significant correlations between the eye and neck dose measurement (right and left sides, R2 = 0.82 and R2 = 0.55, respectively) in physicians. In addition, we found significant correlations between CT-related parameters, such as CT-fluoroscopy mAs, and radiation eye doses (right and left sides, R2 = 0.50 and R2 = 0.52, respectively). The eye dose of Hp (3) received in CTF was underestimated when evaluated using neck dosimeters. Therefore, we suggest that the physician involved in CTF use a direct eye dosimeter such as the DOSIRIS for the accurate evaluation of their eye lens dose.
Collapse
|
4
|
Petrovic B, Vicko F, Radovanovic D, Samac J, Tot A, Radovanovic Z, Ivkovic-Kapicl T, Lukic D, Marjanovic M, Ivanov O. Occupational radiation dose of personnel involved in sentinel node biopsy procedure. Phys Med 2021; 91:117-120. [PMID: 34773831 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sentinel node biopsy is a procedure used for axillary nodal staging in breast cancer surgery. The process uses radioactive 99mTc isotope for mapping the sentinel node(s) and all the staff involved in the procedure is potentially exposed to ionizing radiation. The colloid for radiolabelling (antimone-sulphide) with 99mTc isotope (half-life 6 h) is injected into the patient breast. The injection has activity of 18.5 MBq. The surgeon removes the primary tumor and detects active lymph nodes with gamma detection unit. The tumor as well as the active nodal tissue is transferred to pathologist for the definitive findings. The aim of the study was to measure dose equivalents to extremities and whole body for all staff and suggest practice improvement in order to minimize exposure risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS The measurements of the following operational quantities were performed: Hp(10) personal dose equivalent to whole body and Hp(0.07) to extremities for staff as well as ambiental dose for operating theatre and during injection. Hp(0.07) were measured at surgeon's finger by ring thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) type MTS-N, and reader RADOS RE2000. Surgeon and nurse were wearing TLD personal dosimeter at the chest level. Anesthesiologist and anesthetist were wearing electronic personal dosimeters, while pathologist was wearing ring TLD while manipulating tissue samples. Electronic dosimeters used were manufactured by Polimaster, type PM1610. All TLD and electronic dosimeters data were reported, including background radiation. Background radiation was also monitored separately. Personal TLDs are standard for this type of personal monitoring, provided by accredited laboratory. Measurements of ambiental dose in workplaces of other staff involved around the patient was performed before the surgery took place, by calibrated survey meters manufactured by Atomtex, type 1667. The study involved two surgeons and one pathologist, two anesthesiologists and three anesthetists during two months period. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The doses received by all staff are evaluated using passive and active personal dosimeters and ambiental dose monitors and practice was improved based on results collected. Average annual whole body dose for all staff involved in the procedure was less than 0.8 mSv. Extremity dose equivalents to surgeon and pathologist were far below the limits set for professionally exposed (surgeon) and for public (pathologist). CONCLUSIONS Although has proven to be very safe for all staff, additional measures for radiation protection, in accordance to ALARA principle (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) should be conducted. The recommendations for practice improvement with respect to radiation protection were issued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borislava Petrovic
- Faculty of Sciences, Department of Physics, University Novi Sad, Trg D. Obradovica 3, Novi Sad, Serbia; Oncology Institute Vojvodina, Put dr Goldmana 4, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia.
| | - Ferenc Vicko
- Faculty of Medicine, University Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljka 11, Novi Sad, Serbia; Oncology Institute Vojvodina, Put dr Goldmana 4, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Dragana Radovanovic
- Faculty of Medicine, University Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljka 11, Novi Sad, Serbia; Oncology Institute Vojvodina, Put dr Goldmana 4, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Jelena Samac
- Clinical Center Vojvodina, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Arpad Tot
- Oncology Institute Vojvodina, Put dr Goldmana 4, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia; Institute of Nuclear Sciences Vinca, PO Box 522, Vinca, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Zoran Radovanovic
- Faculty of Medicine, University Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljka 11, Novi Sad, Serbia; Oncology Institute Vojvodina, Put dr Goldmana 4, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Tatjana Ivkovic-Kapicl
- Faculty of Medicine, University Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljka 11, Novi Sad, Serbia; Oncology Institute Vojvodina, Put dr Goldmana 4, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Dejan Lukic
- Faculty of Medicine, University Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljka 11, Novi Sad, Serbia; Oncology Institute Vojvodina, Put dr Goldmana 4, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Milana Marjanovic
- Faculty of Sciences, Department of Physics, University Novi Sad, Trg D. Obradovica 3, Novi Sad, Serbia; Oncology Institute Vojvodina, Put dr Goldmana 4, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Olivera Ivanov
- Faculty of Medicine, University Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljka 11, Novi Sad, Serbia; Oncology Institute Vojvodina, Put dr Goldmana 4, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Inaba Y, Hitachi S, Watanuki M, Chida K. Occupational Radiation Dose to Eye Lenses in CT-Guided Interventions Using MDCT-Fluoroscopy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11040646. [PMID: 33918341 PMCID: PMC8065869 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11040646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In computed tomography (CT)-guided interventions (CTIs), physicians are close to a source of scattered radiation. The physician and staff are at high risk of radiation-induced injury (cataracts). Thus, dose-reducing measures for physicians are important. However, few previous reports have examined radiation doses to physicians in CTIs. This study evaluated the radiation dose to the physician and medical staff using multi detector (MD)CT-fluoroscopy, and attempted to understand radiation-protection and -reduction methods. The procedures were performed using an interventional radiology (IVR)-CT system. We measured the occupational radiation dose (physician and nurse) using a personal dosimeter in real-time, gathered CT-related parameters (fluoroscopy time, mAs, CT dose index (CTDI), and dose length product (DLP)), and performed consecutive 232 procedures in CT-guided biopsy. Physician doses (eye lens, neck, and hand; μSv, average ± SD) in our CTIs were 39.1 ± 36.3, 23.1 ± 23.7, and 28.6 ± 31.0, respectively. Nurse doses (neck and chest) were lower (2.3 ± 5.0 and 2.4 ± 4.4, respectively) than the physician doses. There were significant correlations between the physician doses (eye and neck) and related factors, such as CT-fluoroscopy mAs (eye dose: r = 0.90 and neck dose: r = 0.83). We need to understand the importance of reducing/optimizing the dose to the physician and medical staff in CTIs. Our study suggests that physician and staff doses were not significant when the procedures were performed with the appropriate radiation protection and low-dose techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohei Inaba
- Course of Radiological Technology, Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan;
- Department of Radiation Disaster Medicine, International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramaki Aza-Aoba, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi 980-0845, Japan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-22-717-8683
| | - Shin Hitachi
- Department of Radiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan;
| | - Munenori Watanuki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan;
| | - Koichi Chida
- Course of Radiological Technology, Health Sciences, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8575, Japan;
- Department of Radiation Disaster Medicine, International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aramaki Aza-Aoba, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi 980-0845, Japan
| |
Collapse
|