Risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after gynecological day surgery

Precision nursing and intermittent pneumatic compression significantly reduce perioperative deep vein thrombosis in post-surgical ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the efficacy of precision nursing combined with intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) devices in preventing perioperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 136 ovarian cancer surgery patients at Xi'an People's Hospital from February 2019 to April 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: 71 patients received precision nursing with IPC intervention (study group), while the remaining received standard nursing care (control group). Key variables analyzed included operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion requirements, changes in limb circumference, and variations in coagulation parameters activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D-Dimer (D-D), Fibrinogen (FIB), and Prothrombin Time (PT) before and after surgery. The incidence of DVT was recorded in both groups to determine risk factors for deep vein thrombosis.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative blood transfusion rates (P > 0.05). Post-intervention, significant improvements were noted in the study group, with reduced FIB and D-D levels and increased PT and APTT levels compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the study group exhibited a significantly smaller post-intervention difference in limb circumference and a lower incidence of DVT (P=0.003). Precision nursing combined with IPC, pre-intervention D-D < 498.5, and FIGO stages III+IV were identified as independent factors against DVT development.

CONCLUSION

Precision nursing paired with an IPC device significantly reduces the risk of perioperative DVT in ovarian cancer patients compared to conventional care.

Enhanced recovery protocols for ambulatory surgery

INTRODUCTION

In the United States, ambulatory surgeries account for up to 87% of all surgical procedures. (1) It was estimated that 19.2 million ambulatory surgeries were performed in 2018 (https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb287-Ambulatory-Surgery-Overview-2019.pdf). Cataract procedures and musculoskeletal surgeries are the most common surgical interventions performed in ambulatory centers. However, more complex surgical interventions, such as sleeve gastrectomies, oncological, and spine surgeries, and even arthroplasties are routinely performed as day cases or in a model of an ambulatory extended recovery. (2-5) The ambulatory surgery centers industry has grown since 2017 by 1.1% per year and reached a market size of $31.2 billion. According to the Ambulatory Surgery Center Association, there is a potential to save $57.6 billion in Medicare costs over the next decade (https://www.ibisworld.com/industry-statistics/market-size/ambulatory-surgery-centers-united-states/). These data suggest an expected rise in the volume of ambulatory (same day) or extended ambulatory (23 h) surgeries in coming years. Similar increases are also observed in other countries. For example, 75% of elective surgeries are performed as same-day surgery in the United Kingdom. (6) To reduce costs and improve the quality of care after those more complex procedures, ambulatory surgery centers have started implementing patient-centered, high-quality, value-based practices. To achieve those goals, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented to reduce the length of stay, decrease costs, increase patients' satisfaction, and transform clinical practices. The ERAS fundamentals for ambulatory surgery are based on five pillars, including (1) preoperative patient counseling, education, and optimization; (2) multimodal and opioid-sparing analgesia; (3) nausea and vomiting, wound infection, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; (4) maintenance of euvolemia; and (5) encouragement of early mobility. Those pillars rely on interdisciplinary teamwork led by anesthesiologists, surgery-specific workgroups, and safety culture. (2) Research shows that a team of ambulatory anesthesiologists is crucial in improving postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain control. (7) This review will summarize the current evidence on the elements and clinical importance of implementing ERAS protocol for ambulatory surgery.

Risk factors for patients with acute hospital-acquired symptomatic pulmonary thromboembolism

This study aimed to identify independent risk factors for acute hospital-acquired symptomatic pulmonary embolism (HA-SPE) by comparing the clinical data of HA-SPE and acute nonhospital-acquired symptomatic pulmonary embolism (NHA-SPE). A total of 292 patients were included in the analysis and divided into two groups: 191 patients had acute NHA-SPE, and 101 patients had acute HA-SPE. The average age of these 292 patients was 63.2 years, and the sample included 145 males. Multivariate analysis showed that malignant tumour (OR, 3.811; 95% CI [1.914-7.586], P = 0.000), recent surgery (OR, 7.310; 95% CI 3.392-15.755], P = 0.000), previous VTE (OR, 5.973; 95% CI 2.194 16.262], P = 0. 000), and the length of stay (LOS) (OR, 1.075; 95% CI [1.040-1.111], P = 0.000) were independent risk factors for acute HA-AEP. The c-statistic for this model was 0.758 (95% CI [0.698-0.800], P < 0.0001). The K-M curve showed that the hazard ratio (HR) of the HA group to the NHA group in all-cause mortality was 3.807 (95% CI [1.987, 7.295], P = 0.0061). Strengthening the prevention and control of patients with these risk factors may reduce the incidence of acute HA-SPE.