1
|
Sezgin MG, Bektas H. A retrospective study of treatment and outcomes of patients with lymphoma undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A single-center experience. Transpl Immunol 2023; 79:101855. [PMID: 37201796 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early evaluation of symptoms and taking appropriate preventive measures can improve outcomes for patients with lymphoma undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This study aimed to examine the treatment and outcomes of patients with lymphoma undergoing HSCT. METHODS Patients with lymphoma undergoing SCT at a university hospital between 15.06.2018 and 15.06.2020, were selected for a retrospective study. The medical treatments of patients were obtained from the records on the Hospital Information Management System (HIMS) database. The study was reported following the STROBE checklist. RESULTS Sixty-four patients were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 48.25 ± 16.93 (p = 0.76). Although relapse developed in 26 (40.6%) patients with lymphoma, remission was achieved in 38 (59.4%) patients. The incidence of skin graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) symptoms in patients with relapse [14(53.8%)] was found to be significantly higher than in patients in remission [4(10.5%)] (p < 0.001). The most common symptoms seen in patients undergoing HSCT were oral mucositis (78.1%), febrile neutropenia (68.8%), and anemia (56.3%). In the treatments applied after SCT, the administration of antifungal (p = 0.033), analgesic (p = 0.001), and anticoagulant (p = 0.008) treatments to the patients who were in remission compared with the relapsed patients was significant. Less courses (OR: 0.446; 95% CI: 0.22-0.907; p = 0.026), analgesic therapy (OR:6.22; 95% CI: 1.61-24.027; p = 0.008), and anticoagulant treatment (OR:7.13; %) 95 CI: 1.374-37.1; p = 0.019) were found to increase the risk of relapse. Because of the increase in the number of cures in SCT, the incidence of diarrhea (p = 0.016) and GIS GVHD (p = 0.022) was high. It was determined that the hospitalization period was shorter in patients with febrile neutropenia (p = 0.021), thrombocytopenia/bleeding (p = 0.031), and secretion (p = 0.036) symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Patients experienced severe symptoms such as oral mucositis, febrile neutropenia, and anemia due to HSCT, and necessary treatment was applied for the symptoms. Further clinical studies must determine the symptoms and patient outcomes associated with SCT. It is predicted that patients will benefit from regular follow-up of their symptoms and planning of appropriate evidence-based nursing interventions and that this will improve the quality of care to be offered to them and increase their life span.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merve Gozde Sezgin
- Akdeniz University Faculty of Nursing, Department of Internal Medicine Nursing, Antalya, Turkey.
| | - Hicran Bektas
- Akdeniz University Faculty of Nursing, Department of Internal Medicine Nursing, Antalya, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Snijders RAH, Brom L, Theunissen M, van den Beuken-van Everdingen MHJ. Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients with Cancer 2022: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:591. [PMID: 36765547 PMCID: PMC9913127 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 74.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Experiencing pain and insufficient relief can be devastating and negatively affect a patient's quality of life. Developments in oncology such as new treatments and adjusted pain management guidelines may have influenced the prevalence of cancer pain and severity in patients. This review aims to provide an overview of the prevalence and severity of pain in cancer patients in the 2014-2021 literature period. A systematic literature search was performed using the databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane. Titles and abstracts were screened, and full texts were evaluated and assessed on methodological quality. A meta-analysis was performed on the pooled prevalence and severity rates. A meta-regression analysis was used to explore differences between treatment groups. We identified 10,637 studies, of which 444 studies were included. The overall prevalence of pain was 44.5%. Moderate to severe pain was experienced by 30.6% of the patients, a lower proportion compared to previous research. Pain experienced by cancer survivors was significantly lower compared to most treatment groups. Our results imply that both the prevalence of pain and pain severity declined in the past decade. Increased attention to the assessment and management of pain might have fostered the decline in the prevalence and severity of pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rolf A. H. Snijders
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Department of Research & Development, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Association for Palliative Care (PZNL), 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Brom
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Department of Research & Development, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Association for Palliative Care (PZNL), 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice Theunissen
- Centre of Expertise for Palliative Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke H. J. van den Beuken-van Everdingen
- Centre of Expertise for Palliative Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Banerjee R, Huang CY, Dunn L, Knoche J, Ryan C, Brassil K, Jackson L, Patel D, Lo M, Arora S, Wong SW, Wolf J, Martin Iii T, Dhruva A, Shah N. Digital Life Coaching During Stem Cell Transplantation: Development and Usability Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e33701. [PMID: 35039279 PMCID: PMC8933800 DOI: 10.2196/33701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with multiple myeloma receiving high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT), acute life disruptions and symptom burden may lead to worsened quality of life (QOL) and increased emotional distress. Digital life coaching (DLC), whereby trained coaches deliver personalized well-being-related support via phone calls and SMS text messaging, has been shown to improve QOL among SCT survivors. However, DLC has not been investigated during the acute peri-SCT period, which is generally characterized by symptomatic exacerbations and 2-week hospitalizations. OBJECTIVE We launched a single-arm pilot study to investigate the feasibility of patient engagement with DLC during this intensive period. METHODS We approached English-speaking adult patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous SCT at our center. Enrolled patients received 16 weeks of virtual access to a life coach beginning on day -5 before SCT. Coaches used structured frameworks to help patients identify and overcome personal barriers to well-being. Patients chose the coaching topics and preferred communication styles. Our primary endpoint was ongoing DLC engagement, defined as bidirectional conversations occurring at least once every 4 weeks during the study period. Secondary endpoints were electronic patient-reported outcome assessments of QOL, distress, and sleep disturbances. RESULTS Of the 20 patients who were screened, 17 (85%) chose to enroll and 15 (75%) underwent SCT as planned. Of these 15 patients (median age 65 years, range 50-81 years), 11 (73%) demonstrated ongoing DLC engagement. The median frequency of bidirectional conversations during the 3-month study period was once every 6.2 days (range 3.9-28 days). During index hospitalizations with median lengths of stay of 16 days (range 14-31 days), the median frequency of conversations was once every 5.3 days (range 2.7-15 days). Electronic patient-reported outcome assessments (94% adherence) demonstrated an expected QOL nadir during the second week after SCT. The prevalence of elevated distress was highest immediately before and after SCT, with 69% of patients exhibiting elevated distress on day -5 and on day +2. CONCLUSIONS DLC may be feasible for older patients during intensive hospital-based cancer treatments such as autologous SCT for multiple myeloma. The limitations of our study include small sample size, selection bias among enrolled patients, and heterogeneity in DLC use. Based on the positive results of this pilot study, a larger phase 2 randomized study of DLC during SCT is underway to investigate the efficacy of DLC with regard to patient well-being. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04432818; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04432818.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Banerjee
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Chiung-Yu Huang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Lisa Dunn
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Jennifer Knoche
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Chloe Ryan
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Mimi Lo
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Shagun Arora
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Sandy W Wong
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Jeffrey Wolf
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Thomas Martin Iii
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Anand Dhruva
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Nina Shah
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|