1
|
Chalopin Y. GPCR Signaling: A Study of the Interplay Between Structure, Energy, and Function. Proteins 2024. [PMID: 39095933 DOI: 10.1002/prot.26724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) exemplify sophisticated allosteric communication, transducing extracellular signals through ligand-induced structural rearrangements that resonate through the molecular scaffold. Despite extensive study, the biophysical underpinnings of how conformational changes spread remain unclear. This work employs a novel physics-based framework to characterize the role of energy dissipation in directing intramolecular signaling pathways. By modeling each residue as a network of coupled oscillators, we generate a localization landscape depicting the vibrational energy distribution throughout the protein scaffold. Quantifying directional energy flux between residues reveals distinct pathways for energy and information transfer, illuminating sequences of allosteric communication. Our analysis of CB1 and CCR5 crystal structures unveils an anisotropic pattern of energy dissipation aligning with key functional dynamics, such as activation-related conformational changes. These anisotropic patterns of vibrational energy flow constitute pre-configured channels for allosteric signaling. Elucidating the relationship between structural topology and energy dissipation patterns provides key insights into the thermodynamic drivers of conformational signaling. This methodology significantly advances our mechanistic understanding of allostery in GPCRs and presents a broadly applicable approach for rationally dissecting allosteric communication pathways, with potential implications for structure-based drug design targeting these critical receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yann Chalopin
- Structures, Properties and Modeling of Solids Laboratory Physics Department, CentraleSupélec/National Center for the Scientific Research, University of Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dutta S, Shukla D. Characterization of binding kinetics and intracellular signaling of new psychoactive substances targeting cannabinoid receptor using transition-based reweighting method. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.09.29.560261. [PMID: 37873328 PMCID: PMC10592854 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.29.560261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
New psychoactive substances (NPS) targeting cannabinoid receptor 1 pose a significant threat to society as recreational abusive drugs that have pronounced physiological side effects. These greater adverse effects compared to classical cannabinoids have been linked to the higher downstream β-arrestin signaling. Thus, understanding the mechanism of differential signaling will reveal important structure-activity relationship essential for identifying and potentially regulating NPS molecules. In this study, we simulate the slow (un)binding process of NPS MDMB-Fubinaca and classical cannabinoid HU-210 from CB1 using multi-ensemble simulation to decipher the effects of ligand binding dynamics on downstream signaling. The transition-based reweighing method is used for the estimation of transition rates and underlying thermodynamics of (un)binding processes of ligands with nanomolar affinities. Our analyses reveal major interaction differences with transmembrane TM7 between NPS and classical cannabinoids. A variational autoencoder-based approach, neural relational inference (NRI), is applied to assess the allosteric effects on intracellular regions attributable to variations in binding pocket interactions. NRI analysis indicate a heightened level of allosteric control of NPxxY motif for NPS-bound receptors, which contributes to the higher probability of formation of a crucial triad interaction (Y7.53-Y5.58-T3.46) necessary for stronger β-arrestin signaling. Hence, in this work, MD simulation, data-driven statistical methods, and deep learning point out the structural basis for the heightened physiological side effects associated with NPS, contributing to efforts aimed at mitigating their public health impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soumajit Dutta
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801
| | - Diwakar Shukla
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801
- Center for Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801
- Cancer Center at Illinois, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brust CA, Swanson MA, Bohn LM. Structural and functional insights into the G protein-coupled receptors: CB1 and CB2. Biochem Soc Trans 2023; 51:1533-1543. [PMID: 37646476 PMCID: PMC10586759 DOI: 10.1042/bst20221316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
The cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 mediate a variety of physiological processes and continue to be explored as desirable drug targets. Both receptors are activated by the endogenous endocannabinoids and the psychoactive components of marijuana. Over the years, many efforts have been made to make selective ligands; however, the high degree of homology between cannabinoid receptor subtypes introduces challenges in studying either receptor in isolation. Recent advancements in structure biology have resulted in a surge of high-resolution structures, enriching our knowledge and understanding of receptor structure and function. In this review, of recent cannabinoid receptor structures, key features of the inactive and active state CB1 and CB2 are presented. These structures will provide additional insight into the modulation and signaling mechanism of cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 and aid in the development of future therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina A. Brust
- Department of Molecular Medicine, The Herbert Wertheim UF Scripps Institute for Biomedical Innovation and Technology, Jupiter, FL 33458, U.S.A
- The Skaggs Graduate School of Chemical and Biological Sciences at Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA 92037, U.S.A
| | - Matthew A. Swanson
- Department of Molecular Medicine, The Herbert Wertheim UF Scripps Institute for Biomedical Innovation and Technology, Jupiter, FL 33458, U.S.A
- The Skaggs Graduate School of Chemical and Biological Sciences at Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA 92037, U.S.A
| | - Laura M. Bohn
- Department of Molecular Medicine, The Herbert Wertheim UF Scripps Institute for Biomedical Innovation and Technology, Jupiter, FL 33458, U.S.A
- The Skaggs Graduate School of Chemical and Biological Sciences at Scripps Research, La Jolla, CA 92037, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brandt SD, Kavanagh PV, Westphal F, Dreiseitel W, Dowling G, Bowden MJ, Williamson JPB. Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists: Analytical profiles and development of QMPSB, QMMSB, QMPCB, 2F-QMPSB, QMiPSB, and SGT-233. Drug Test Anal 2020; 13:175-196. [PMID: 32880103 DOI: 10.1002/dta.2913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
A diverse assortment of molecules designed to explore the cannabinoid receptor system and considered new psychoactive substances (NPS) have become known as synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs). One group of SCRAs that has received little attention involves those exhibiting sulfamoyl benzoate, sulfamoyl benzamide, and N-benzoylpiperidine based structures. In this study, quinolin-8-yl 4-methyl-3-(piperidine-1-sulfonyl)benzoate (QMPSB), quinolin-8-yl 4-methyl-3-(morpholine-4-sulfonyl)benzoate (QMMSB), quinolin-8-yl 4-methyl-3-(piperidine-1-carbonyl)benzoate (QMPCB, SGT-11), quinolin-8-yl 3-(4,4-difluoropiperidine-1-sulfonyl)-4-methylbenzoate (2F-QMPSB, QMDFPSB, SGT-13), quinolin-8-yl 4-methyl-3-[(propan-2-yl)sulfamoyl]benzoate (QMiPSB, SGT-46), and 3-(4,4-difluoropiperidine-1-sulfonyl)-4-methyl-N-(2-phenylpropan-2-yl)benzamide (SGT-233) were extensively characterized (including data on impurities). The analytical profiles may be useful to researchers and scientists who deal with the emergence of NPS during forensic and clinical investigations. The detection of QMPSB was first published in 2016 but it is worth noting that Stargate International, a company originally formed to develop harm reduction solutions, were involved in the investigation and development of these six compounds for potential release between 2011 and early 2014. Whilst information on the prevalence of use of these particular compounds at the present time is limited, one of the key outcomes of the research performed by Stargate International reviewed here was to set the stage for the quinolin-8-yl ester head group that ultimately led to hybridization with an N-alkyl-1H-indole core to give SGT-21 and SGT-32, which became later known as PB-22 (QMPSB/JWH-018 hybrid) and BB-22, respectively, thus, opening the door to a range of SCRAs carrying the quinolin-8-yl head group from about 2012 onwards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon D Brandt
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - Pierce V Kavanagh
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Folker Westphal
- Section Narcotics/Toxicology, State Bureau of Criminal Investigation Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Geraldine Dowling
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Life Sciences, School of Science, Sligo Institute of Technology, Ash Lane, Sligo, Ireland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shao Z, Yin J, Chapman K, Grzemska M, Clark L, Wang J, Rosenbaum DM. High-resolution crystal structure of the human CB1 cannabinoid receptor. Nature 2016; 540:602-606. [PMID: 27851727 PMCID: PMC5433929 DOI: 10.1038/nature20613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 297] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The human cannabinoid G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) CB1 and CB2 mediate the functional responses to the endocannabinoids anandamide and 2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG) and to the widely consumed plant phytocannabinoid Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). The cannabinoid receptors have been the targets of intensive drug discovery efforts, because modulation of these receptors has therapeutic potential to control pain, epilepsy, obesity, and other disorders. Although much progress in understanding the biophysical properties of GPCRs has recently been made, investigations of the molecular mechanisms of the cannabinoids and their receptors have lacked high-resolution structural data. Here we report the use of GPCR engineering and lipidic cubic phase crystallization to determine the structure of the human CB1 receptor bound to the inhibitor taranabant at 2.6-Å resolution. We found that the extracellular surface of CB1, including the highly conserved membrane-proximal N-terminal region, is distinct from those of other lipid-activated GPCRs, forming a critical part of the ligand-binding pocket. Docking studies further demonstrate how this same pocket may accommodate the cannabinoid agonist THC. Our CB1 structure provides an atomic framework for studying cannabinoid receptor function and will aid the design and optimization of therapeutic modulators of the endocannabinoid system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenhua Shao
- Department of Biophysics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA
| | - Jie Yin
- Department of Biophysics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA
| | - Karen Chapman
- Department of Biophysics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA
| | - Magdalena Grzemska
- Department of Biophysics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA
| | - Lindsay Clark
- Department of Biophysics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA
| | - Junmei Wang
- Green Center for Systems Biology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA
| | - Daniel M. Rosenbaum
- Department of Biophysics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Scott C, Ahn KH, Graf ST, Goddard WA, Kendall DA, Abrol R. Computational Prediction and Biochemical Analyses of New Inverse Agonists for the CB1 Receptor. J Chem Inf Model 2016; 56:201-12. [PMID: 26633590 PMCID: PMC4863456 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Human cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) G-protein coupled receptor is a potential therapeutic target for obesity. The previously predicted and experimentally validated ensemble of ligand-free conformations of CB1 [Scott, C. E. et al. Protein Sci. 2013 , 22 , 101 - 113 ; Ahn, K. H. et al. Proteins 2013 , 81 , 1304 - 1317] are used here to predict the binding sites for known CB1-selective inverse agonists including rimonabant and its seven known derivatives. This binding pocket, which differs significantly from previously published models, is used to identify 16 novel compounds expected to be CB1 inverse agonists by exploiting potential new interactions. We show experimentally that two of these compounds exhibit inverse agonist properties including inhibition of basal and agonist-induced G-protein coupling activity, as well as an enhanced level of CB1 cell surface localization. This demonstrates the utility of using the predicted binding sites for an ensemble of CB1 receptor structures for designing new CB1 inverse agonists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin
E. Scott
- Materials
and Process Simulation Center, Division of Chemistry and Chemical
Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
| | - Kwang H. Ahn
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of
Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, United States
| | - Steven T. Graf
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of
Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, United States
| | - William A. Goddard
- Materials
and Process Simulation Center, Division of Chemistry and Chemical
Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
| | - Debra A. Kendall
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of
Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, United States
| | - Ravinder Abrol
- Materials
and Process Simulation Center, Division of Chemistry and Chemical
Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Iyer MR, Cinar R, Liu J, Godlewski G, Szanda G, Puhl H, Ikeda SR, Deschamps J, Lee YS, Steinbach PJ, Kunos G. Structural Basis of Species-Dependent Differential Affinity of 6-Alkoxy-5-Aryl-3-Pyridinecarboxamide Cannabinoid-1 Receptor Antagonists. Mol Pharmacol 2015; 88:238-44. [PMID: 26013543 DOI: 10.1124/mol.115.098541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2015] [Accepted: 05/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
6-Alkoxy-5-aryl-3-pyridincarboxamides, including the brain-penetrant compound 14G: [5-(4-chlorophenyl)-6-(cyclopropylmethoxy)-N-[(1R,2R)-2-hydroxy-cyclohexyl]-3-pyridinecarboxamide] and its peripherally restricted analog 14H: [5-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-[(1R,2R)-2-hydroxycyclohexyl]-6-(2-methoxyethoxy)-3-pyridinecarboxamide], have been recently introduced as selective, high-affinity antagonists of the human cannabinoid-1 receptor (hCB1R). Binding analyses revealed two orders of magnitude lower affinity of these compounds for mouse and rat versus human CB1R, whereas the affinity of rimonabant is comparable for all three CB1Rs. Modeling of ligand binding to CB1R and binding assays with native and mutant (Ile105Met) hCB1Rs indicate that the Ile105 to Met mutation in rodent CB1Rs accounts for the species-dependent affinity of 14G: and 14H: . Our work identifies Ile105 as a new pharmacophore component for developing better hCB1R antagonists and invalidates rodent models for assessing the antiobesity efficacy of 14G: and 14H: .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malliga R Iyer
- Laboratory of Physiologic Studies (M.R.I., R.C., J.L., G.G., G.S., G.K.) and Laboratory of Molecular Physiology (H.P., S.R.I.), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. (J.D.); and Center for Molecular Modeling, Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Y.-S.L., P.J.S.)
| | - Resat Cinar
- Laboratory of Physiologic Studies (M.R.I., R.C., J.L., G.G., G.S., G.K.) and Laboratory of Molecular Physiology (H.P., S.R.I.), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. (J.D.); and Center for Molecular Modeling, Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Y.-S.L., P.J.S.)
| | - Jie Liu
- Laboratory of Physiologic Studies (M.R.I., R.C., J.L., G.G., G.S., G.K.) and Laboratory of Molecular Physiology (H.P., S.R.I.), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. (J.D.); and Center for Molecular Modeling, Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Y.-S.L., P.J.S.)
| | - Grzegorz Godlewski
- Laboratory of Physiologic Studies (M.R.I., R.C., J.L., G.G., G.S., G.K.) and Laboratory of Molecular Physiology (H.P., S.R.I.), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. (J.D.); and Center for Molecular Modeling, Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Y.-S.L., P.J.S.)
| | - Gergö Szanda
- Laboratory of Physiologic Studies (M.R.I., R.C., J.L., G.G., G.S., G.K.) and Laboratory of Molecular Physiology (H.P., S.R.I.), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. (J.D.); and Center for Molecular Modeling, Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Y.-S.L., P.J.S.)
| | - Henry Puhl
- Laboratory of Physiologic Studies (M.R.I., R.C., J.L., G.G., G.S., G.K.) and Laboratory of Molecular Physiology (H.P., S.R.I.), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. (J.D.); and Center for Molecular Modeling, Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Y.-S.L., P.J.S.)
| | - Stephen R Ikeda
- Laboratory of Physiologic Studies (M.R.I., R.C., J.L., G.G., G.S., G.K.) and Laboratory of Molecular Physiology (H.P., S.R.I.), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. (J.D.); and Center for Molecular Modeling, Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Y.-S.L., P.J.S.)
| | - Jeffrey Deschamps
- Laboratory of Physiologic Studies (M.R.I., R.C., J.L., G.G., G.S., G.K.) and Laboratory of Molecular Physiology (H.P., S.R.I.), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. (J.D.); and Center for Molecular Modeling, Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Y.-S.L., P.J.S.)
| | - Yong-Sok Lee
- Laboratory of Physiologic Studies (M.R.I., R.C., J.L., G.G., G.S., G.K.) and Laboratory of Molecular Physiology (H.P., S.R.I.), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. (J.D.); and Center for Molecular Modeling, Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Y.-S.L., P.J.S.)
| | - Peter J Steinbach
- Laboratory of Physiologic Studies (M.R.I., R.C., J.L., G.G., G.S., G.K.) and Laboratory of Molecular Physiology (H.P., S.R.I.), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. (J.D.); and Center for Molecular Modeling, Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Y.-S.L., P.J.S.)
| | - George Kunos
- Laboratory of Physiologic Studies (M.R.I., R.C., J.L., G.G., G.S., G.K.) and Laboratory of Molecular Physiology (H.P., S.R.I.), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. (J.D.); and Center for Molecular Modeling, Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Y.-S.L., P.J.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ellsworth BA, Sher PM, Wu X, Wu G, Sulsky RB, Gu Z, Murugesan N, Zhu Y, Yu G, Sitkoff DF, Carlson KE, Kang L, Yang Y, Lee N, Baska RA, Keim WJ, Cullen MJ, Azzara AV, Zuvich E, Thomas MA, Rohrbach KW, Devenny JJ, Godonis HE, Harvey SJ, Murphy BJ, Everlof GG, Stetsko PI, Gudmundsson O, Johnghar S, Ranasinghe A, Behnia K, Pelleymounter MA, Ewing WR. Reductions in log P Improved Protein Binding and Clearance Predictions Enabling the Prospective Design of Cannabinoid Receptor (CB1) Antagonists with Desired Pharmacokinetic Properties. J Med Chem 2013; 56:9586-600. [DOI: 10.1021/jm4010835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce A. Ellsworth
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Philip M. Sher
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Ximao Wu
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Gang Wu
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Richard B. Sulsky
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Zhengxiang Gu
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Natesan Murugesan
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Yeheng Zhu
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Guixue Yu
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Doree F. Sitkoff
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Kenneth E. Carlson
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Liya Kang
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Yifan Yang
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Ning Lee
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Rose A. Baska
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - William J. Keim
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Mary Jane Cullen
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Anthony V. Azzara
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Eva Zuvich
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Michael A. Thomas
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Kenneth W. Rohrbach
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - James J. Devenny
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Helen E. Godonis
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Susan J. Harvey
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Brian J. Murphy
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Gerry G. Everlof
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Paul I. Stetsko
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Olafur Gudmundsson
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Susan Johnghar
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Asoka Ranasinghe
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Kamelia Behnia
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - Mary Ann Pelleymounter
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| | - William R. Ewing
- Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co., P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-5400, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ligand-specific homology modeling of human cannabinoid (CB1) receptor. J Mol Graph Model 2012; 38:155-64. [PMID: 23079645 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2012.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2012] [Revised: 05/09/2012] [Accepted: 05/15/2012] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Cannabinoid (CB1) receptor is a therapeutic drug target, and its structure and conformational changes after ligand binding are of great interest. To study the protein conformations in ligand bound state and assist in drug discovery, CB1 receptor homology models are needed for computer-based ligand screening. The known CB1 ligands are highly diverse structurally, so CB1 receptor may undergo considerable conformational changes to accept different ligands, which is challenging for molecular docking methods. To account for the flexibility of CB1 receptor, we constructed four CB1 receptor models based on four structurally distinct ligands, HU-210, ACEA, WIN55212-2 and SR141716A, using the newest X-ray crystal structures of human β₂ adrenergic receptor and adenosine A(2A) receptor as templates. The conformations of these four CB1-ligand complexes were optimized by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The models revealed interactions between CB1 receptor and known binders suggested by experiments and could successfully discriminate known ligands and non-binders in our docking assays. MD simulations were used to study the most flexible ligand, ACEA, in its free and bound states to investigate structural mobility achieved by the rearrangement of the fatty acid chain. Our models may capture important conformational changes of CB1 receptor to help improve accuracy in future CB1 drug screening.
Collapse
|