Assisted techniques for vertebral cementoplasty: why should we do it?

'Armed kyphoplasty' with posterior stabilization avoids corpectomy in complex thoracolumbar spine fractures: a case series

BACKGROUND

Complex thoracolumbar fractures require reduction and stabilization. Posterior instrumentation alone and standard cement augmentation may represent undertreatment, while corpectomy has significant morbidity. In a series of unstable thoracolumbar fractures, we assessed the feasibility, safety, and results of 'armed kyphoplasty' (AKP) and surgical posterior stabilization (PS).

METHODS

A total of 24 consecutive patients were treated with combined AKP and PS. Minimally invasive and open surgery techniques were used for PS. AKP was performed with C-arm or biplane fluoroscopic guidance, and screws were placed under navigation or fluoroscopic guidance. A postoperative CT scan and standing plain films were obtained. Patients were followed up according to clinical standards. Kyphosis correction (measured with regional Cobb angle), pain (measured with the Numeric Rating Scale), neurological status (measured with Frankel grade) were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 25 fractures of neoplastic (40%), traumatic (32%), and osteoporotic (28%) nature were treated. Open surgery and minimally invasive techniques were applied in 16/24 and 8/24 patients, respectively. Decompressive laminectomy was performed in 13 cases. No intraprocedural complications occurred. Two patients (8%) died due to underlying disease complications and three complications (12%) required re-intervention (one surgical site infection, one adjacent fracture, and one screw pull-out) in the first month. The mean Cobb angle was 20.14±6.19° before treatment and 11.66±5.24° after treatment (P<0.0001). No re-fractures occurred at the treated levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined AKP and PS is feasible and effective in the treatment of complex thoracolumbar fractures of all etiologies. AKP avoided highly invasive corpectomy. Anterior and posterior support ensured stability, preventing implant failure and re-fracture. The complication rate was low compared with more invasive traditional 360° open surgical approaches.

Multimodal locoregional procedures for cancer pain management: a literature review

Pain is the most common and fearsome symptom in cancer patients, particularly in the advanced stage of disease. In cancer pain management, the first option is represented by analgesic drugs, whereas surgery is rarely used. Prior to considering surgical intervention, less invasive locoregional procedures are available from the wide pain management arsenal. In this review article, comprehensive information about the most commonly used locoregional options available for treating cancer pain focusing on interventional radiology (neurolysis, augmentation techniques, and embolization) and interventional radiotherapy were provided, also highlighting the potential ways to increase the effectiveness of treatments.

INTRAVERTEBRAL EXPANDABLE IMPLANTS IN THORACOLUMBAR VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURES

Current scientific evidence enhances the importance of the anatomic restauration of vertebral bodies with compression fractures aiming, as with other human body joints, to obtain a biomechanic and functional spine as close as the one prior to the fracture as possible. We consider that anatomic reduction of these fractures is only completely possible using intravertebral expandable implants, restoring vertebral endplate morphology, and enabling a more adequate intervertebral disc healing. This enables avoiding disc and osteodegenerative changes to that vertebral segment and its adjacent levels, as well as the anterior overload of adjacent vertebral bodies in older adults - a consequence of post-traumatic vertebral flattening - thus minimizing the risk of adjacent vertebral fractures. The ability of vertebral body fracture reduction and height maintenance over time and its percutaneous transpedicular application make the intra-vertebral expandable implants a very attractive option for treating these fractures. The authors show the direct and indirect reduction concepts of vertebral fractures, review the biomechanics, characteristics and indications of intravertebral expandable implants and present a suggestion for updating the algorithm for the surgical treatment of vertebral compression fractures which includes the use of intravertebral expandable implants. Level of Evidence V, Expert Opinion.

Expandable Intravertebral Implants: A Narrative Review on the Concept, Biomechanics, and Outcomes in Traumatology

Expandable intravertebral implants are self-expanding devices applied percutaneously by the posterior transpedicular approach. These devices introduce the concept of anatomical restoration of vertebral body endplates and direct anatomical reduction performed from the interior of the vertebral body with a compression fracture. This paper aims to provide a narrative review on the concept, indications, biomechanical characteristics, as well as functional and radiographic outcomes of the main expandable intravertebral implants currently available, in terms of their application to thoracolumbar spine traumatology. To this end, we performed a search in July 2021 on the MEDLINE/PubMed platform with the words "expandable intravertebral implant", "armed kyphoplasty", "Vertebral Body Stenting" or "stentoplasty" and "SpineJack". The search yielded 144 papers, and of those, we included 15 in this review. We concluded that percutaneous transpedicular posterior access, the ability to reduce vertebral body fractures, particularly of the vertebral endplates and to maintain the vertebral body height, makes the application of expandable intravertebral implants an attractive option in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures. However, more prospective, randomized, and large-scale blinded studies are still warranted, especially comparative studies between treatments and about the preferential use of an expansive implant over others, in order to gain definitive insights into the effectiveness and indications of each of these devices.

A novel vertebroplasty technique using a larger-diameter needle for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP) are well-established minimally invasive surgical procedures for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). However, some drawbacks have been reported regarding these procedures, including height loss, cement leakage, and loss of the restored height after balloon deflation. We performed a novel VP technique to minimize these limitations of conventional procedures. This study aimed to compare radiological and clinical outcomes of our method using a larger-diameter needle versus conventional VP (using a smaller needle) for thoracolumbar OVCF.From April 2016 to May 2017, 107 consecutive patients diagnosed with thoracolumbar OVCF were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 underwent conventional VP, i.e., using a smaller diameter needle, and group 2 underwent VP through a modified method with a larger-diameter needle. For radiological evaluation, parameters related to anterior vertebral height (AVH) and segmental angle were assessed using plain standing radiographs, and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale. Cement injection amount and leakage pattern were also analyzed. Group 2 showed a larger anterior vertebral height change than group 1 immediately postoperatively and one year postoperatively. The 1-year postoperatively-AVH maintained better in group 2 than in group 1. Group 2 showed more significant improvement of segmental angle immediately postoperatively than group 1 (3.15° in group 1 vs 9.36° in group 2). IYPo-visual analog scale significantly improved in both groups, with greater improvement in group 2 (3.69 in group 1 vs 5.63 in group 2). A substantially larger amount of cement was injected, with a lower leakage rate in group 2 than in group 1.A novel VP technique using a larger-diameter needle showed superior radiological and clinical outcomes than conventional VP. Therefore, it can be considered a useful treatment option for OVCF.

Selections of Bone Cement Viscosity and Volume in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the efficacy and complications of percutaneous vertebroplasty with different viscosities and volumes of bone cement in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 307 patients treated for a single thoracolumbar level (T12-L2) OVCF in our hospital between January 2014 and December 2019. The patients were divided into 6 groups according to different viscosities (I: low-viscosity bone cement, II: high-viscosity bone cement) and injection volumes (A, 2-4 mL; B, 4-6 mL; C, 6-8 mL) of bone cement. Clinical and radiologic characteristics including visual analog scale, local kyphotic angle, anterior vertebral height ratio, cement leakage, and vertebral body recollapse rate were collected preoperatively, 2 days postoperation, and at the last follow-up to assess the efficacy and complications of each group.

RESULTS

Regarding efficacy, there was no significant difference between the 2 kinds of bone cement. Injecting >4 mL of cement can provide patients with good improvements of clinical indicators and a low vertebral body recollapse rate. Injecting 6-8 mL of bone cement slightly improved the radiologic indicators. However, the leakage rate of low-viscosity bone cement increased significantly when the volume exceeded 6 mL. The leakage rate of high-viscosity bone cement did not increase significantly at the volume of 6-8 mL.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, when treating single thoracolumbar level OVCFs, the recommended volume of low-viscosity bone cement is 4-6 mL while the optimal volume of high-viscosity bone cement is 6-8 mL.

Efficacy of a Novel Vertebral Body Augmentation System in the Treatment of Patients with Symptomatic Vertebral Body Fractures

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel augmentation implant in the treatment of patients with symptomatic vertebral body fractures.

Materials and Methods

Thirty consecutive patients (seven males and 23 females), mean age of 70 years (range 56 to 89) with osteoporotic fractures and/or low-energy trauma fractures (osteoporosis confirmed by CT), were enrolled in an IRB-approved prospective study. The type of fracture was classified according to the Magerl classification. The patients were treated with the Tektona^® dedicated vertebral body augmentation system. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were obtained after 1, 6 and 12 months. Quality of life was assessed with the SF36 score.

Results

A total of 37 vertebral bodies, mostly from T6 to L5, were treated in the 30 enrolled patients. In 67.6% of the cases (n = 25), lumbar fractures were treated. Most of the fractures (43%; n = 16) were A1.1 according to the Magerl classification. A significant pain reduction evaluated by VAS scores (p < 0.0001) was observed on average 7.6 (before the procedure) to 2.8 (immediately post-treatment), 2.1 and 2.7 (after 6 and 12 months later, respectively). The mean ODI score was 55.5% before treatment, and this was statistically significant reduced to 22.3% and 26.9%, respectively, at 6 and 12 months after treatment (p < 0.0001). The SF36 scores, both physical and mental components, showed statistically significant variations (p < 0.0001) whose direction was subpopulation dependent.

Conclusion

Patients with confirmed osteoporosis, suffering from symptomatic vertebral body fractures (osteoporotic and/or low-energy traumatic), were treated safely and effectively using this novel implant.

Efficacy Analysis of Separation Surgery Combined with SBRT for Spinal Metastases-A Long-Term Follow-Up Study Based on Patients with Spinal Metastatic Tumor in a Single-Center

Objective

Follow‐up data of patients with spinal metastatic tumors were analyzed to investigate the effect of separation surgery combined with SBRT on clinical outcomes.

Methods

The clinical data of 52 patients with spinal metastatic tumors admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 24 males and 28 females, aged 25–77 years, with an average of 56.7 ± 7.4 years. The separation surgery of all patients was successfully completed and followed up. Frankel neurological function grading, Karnofsky performance scores, VAS scores, Epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) grading and muscle strength grading were used to assess the patients’ condition. Kaplan‐Meier analysis and the Log⁃rank test were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and the 95% feasible interval for patients with different ages, genders, and treatments. The multivariate Cox regression model was used to calculate the risk value HR and the 95% feasible interval in patients undergoing only separation surgery or separation surgery combined with SBRT.

Results

After separation surgery, 46 patients had pain relief (88.5%), and the average VAS score decreased to 2.17 ± 0.52 points, which was significantly improved compared with preoperative score (P < 0.01). Muscle strength grading decreased in seven cases, showed no change in two cases, and recovered in 19 cases. Postoperative Frankel neurological function grading and Karnofsky performance scores were also significantly improved compared with preoperative scores (P < 0.01). The patients who accepted separation surgery were followed up for 9–47 months (26.3 ± 18.1 months), and 15 patients died due to the deterioration of the primary tumor. Thirteen patients received SBRT after surgery, including 12 cases of pain relief. The average VAS score of these 13 patients decreased to 1.64±0.41 points, which was significantly improved compared with preoperative and postoperative (P < 0.01), and muscle strength recovered in eight cases. Frankel neurological function grading and Karnofsky performance scores of these patients were also significantly improved compared with preoperative and postoperative Frankel neurological function grading and Karnofsky performance scores (P < 0.01). The patients who accepted separation surgery combined with SBRT were followed up for 11–38 months (mean 22.5 ± 10.2 months), and five cases died of primary tumor. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that separation surgery combined with SBRT was an independent predictor of overall survival rate (OS).

Conclusions

Separation surgery combined with SBRT is an effective way to treat spinal metastatic tumors as it not only has smaller surgical trauma, but can also significantly relieve pain, improve nerve function, and relieve spinal cord compression.

[Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for spinal trauma]

CLINICAL ISSUE

Minimally invasive treatment of spinal fractures.

STANDARD TREATMENT PROCEDURES

Conservative treatment versus spinal surgery.

TREATMENT INNOVATIONS

Minimally invasive stabilization techniques, such as percutaneous (assisted) cementoplasty have been introduced as new procedures.

DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X‑rays and computed tomography (CT) are the imaging techniques of first choice. The most important questions concern recent fractures, instability and indications for minimally invasive treatment.

PERFORMANCE

Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are established methods for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Cementoplasty techniques are promising treatment options for traumatic spinal injuries.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

The application of the techniques should best be carried out in individual cases within the framework of prospective controlled studies.

Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The debate on the efficacy of unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (UPKP) and bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (BPKP) for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) is ongoing.This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical results of UPKP and BPKP in the treatment of OVCFs.

METHODS

Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and the Chinese Biomedical Database publication databases were searched using a date range of January 2008 to November 2016, for studies comparing UPKP and BPKP for the treatment of OVCFs. The clinical effectiveness was assessed by comparing perioperative outcomes (surgery time, the volume of injected cement, X-ray exposure time, and kyphotic angle reduction), clinical outcomes (visual analogue scale [VAS] for pain relief and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] for quality of life), and surgery-related complications (cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fractures). Data were analyzed using Stata/SE11.0 software.

RESULTS

Fourteen trials with 1194 patients were retrieved. The pooled results showed significant differences in surgery time (weighted mean difference [WMD] -21.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-23.57 to -19.30]; P < .001); volume of injected cement [WMD -1.90, 95% CI [-2.26 to -1.54); P < .001); and X-ray exposure time (WMD -13.66, 95%CI [-19.59 to -7.72]; P < .001) between UPKP and BPKP treatments. However, the pooled results showed no significant differences in kyphotic angle reduction, VAS in the short-term, VAS in the long-term, ODI, cement leakage, or adjacent vertebral fractures between the 2 surgical procedures. Following a subgroup analysis, the results based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicated that there were significant differences in surgery time (WMD -24.65, 95%CI [-26.53 to -22.77]; P < .001) and the volume of injected cement (WMD -1.66, 95%CI [-1.97 to -1.36]; P < .001) between UPKP and BPKP treatment procedures, respectively. The results based on RCTs indicated that there were no significant differences, either in kyphotic angle reduction or in X-ray exposure time, between the 2 surgical procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to BPKP procedures, UPKP procedures may achieve similar clinical results in the treatment of OVCFs when assessed in terms of the pain relief, improvements in life quality, and surgery-related complications. However, UPKP procedures had a shorter operation time and volume of injected cement compared with BPKP procedures. Additional high quality and multicenter RCTs are needed to provide further robust evidence.

Percutaneous stabilization of lumbar spine: a literature review and new options in treating spine pain

Vertebral fracture (VF) is a common condition with >160,000 patients affected every year in North America and most of them with affected lumbar vertebrae. The management of VF is well known and defined by many protocols related to associated clinical neurological symptoms, especially in case of the presence or absence of myelopathy or radicular deficit. In this article, we will explore the percutaneous stabilization of the lumbar spine by showing the newest approaches for this condition.

The role of emergency radiology in spinal trauma

Spinal trauma is very frequent injury with different severity and prognosis varying from asymptomatic condition to temporary neurological dysfunction, focal deficit or fatal event. The major causes of spinal trauma are high- and low-energy fall, traffic accident, sport and blunt impact. The radiologist has a role of great responsibility to establish the presence or absence of lesions, to define the characteristics, to assess the prognostic influence and therefore treatment. Imaging has an important role in the management of spinal trauma. The aim of this paper was to describe: incidence and type of vertebral fracture; imaging indication and guidelines for cervical trauma; imaging indication and guidelines for thoracolumbar trauma; multidetector CT indication for trauma spine; MRI indication and protocol for trauma spine.

What's new in vertebral cementoplasty?

Vertebral cementoplasty is a well-known mini-invasive treatment to obtain pain relief in patients affected by vertebral porotic fractures, primary or secondary spine lesions and spine trauma through intrametameric cement injection. Two major categories of treatment are included within the term vertebral cementoplasty: the first is vertebroplasty in which a simple cement injection in the vertebral body is performed; the second is assisted technique in which a device is positioned inside the metamer before the cement injection to restore vertebral height and allow a better cement distribution, reducing the kyphotic deformity of the spine, trying to obtain an almost normal spine biomechanics. We will describe the most advanced techniques and indications of vertebral cementoplasty, having recently expanded the field of applications to not only patients with porotic fractures but also spine tumours and trauma.

Vertebral Augmentation for Osteoporotic Compression Fractures

Vertebral augmentation procedures such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty were developed to reduce pain and improve quality of life for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. However, the use of vertebral augmentation has been debated and questioned since its inception. This article addresses some of these issues.

[Cement augmentation on the spine : Biomechanical considerations]

BACKGROUND

Vertebral compression fractures are the most common osteoporotic fractures. Since the introduction of vertebroplasty and screw augmentation, the management of osteoporotic fractures has changed significantly.

AIMS

The biomechanical characteristics of the risk of adjacent fractures and novel treatment modalities for osteoporotic vertebral fractures, including pure cement augmentation by vertebroplasty, and cement augmentation of screws for posterior instrumentation, are explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen human osteoporotic lumbar spines (L1-5) adjacent to vertebral bodies after vertebroplasty were tested in a servo-hydraulic machine. As augmentation compounds we used standard cement and a modified low-strength cement. Different anchoring pedicle screws were tested with and without cement augmentation in another cohort of human specimens with a simple pull-out test and a fatigue test that better reflects physiological conditions.

RESULTS

Cement augmentation in the osteoporotic spine leads to greater biomechanical stability. However, change in vertebral stiffness resulted in alterations with the risk of adjacent fractures. By using a less firm cement compound, the risk of adjacent fractures is significantly reduced. Both screw augmentation techniques resulted in a significant increase in the withdrawal force compared with the group without cement. Augmentation using perforated screws showed the highest stability in the fatigue test.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The augmentation of cement leads to a significant change in the biomechanical properties. Differences in the stability of adjacent vertebral bodies increase the risk of adjacent fractures, which could be mitigated by a modified cement compound with reduced strength. Screws that were specifically designed for cement application displayed greatest stability in the fatigue test.