Evaluation of the most optimal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging sequence for determining pathological length of capsular contact

Imaging Assessment of Prostate Cancer Extra-prostatic Extension: From Histology to Controversies

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-skin malignancy among men and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Accurate staging of PCa, particularly the assessment of extra-prostatic extension (EPE), is critical for prognosis and treatment planning. EPE, typically evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is associated with higher risks of positive surgical margins, biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and reduced overall survival. Despite the widespread use of MRI, there is no consensus on diagnosing EPE via imaging. There are 2 main scores assessing EPE by MRI: the European Society of Urogenital Radiology score and an MRI-based EPE grading system from an American group. While both are widely recognized, their differences can lead to varying interpretations in specific cases. This paper clarifies the anatomical considerations in diagnosing locally advanced PCa, explores EPE's impact on treatment and prognosis, and evaluates the relevance of MRI findings according to different criteria. Accurate EPE diagnosis remains challenging due to MRI limitations and inconsistencies in interpretation. Understanding these variations is crucial for optimal patient management.

Lesion-based grading system using clinicopathological and MRI features for predicting positive surgical margins in prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a lesion-based grading system using clinicopathological and MRI features for predicting positive surgical margin (PSM) following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) among prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

METHODS

Consecutive MRI examinations of patients undergoing RALP for PCa were retrospectively collected from two medical institutions. Patients from center 1 undergoing RALP between January 2020 and December 2021 were included in the derivation cohort and those between January 2022 and December 2022 were allocated to the validation cohort. Patients from center 2 were assigned to the test cohort. PSM associated imaging and clinicopathological predictors were assessed. A grading system was developed through fixed effect logistic regression and classification and regression tree analysis. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared by Delong test and McNemar test.

RESULTS

A total 489 lesions from 396 patients were included and 82 (29.1%), 32 (35.6%) and 42 (35.9%) of lesions were observed PSM after RALP in the derivation, validation and test cohorts, respectively. The grading system comprised tumor morphology, tumor location, anatomical feature and clinical risk stratification. The grading system demonstrated good prediction performance for PSM in the derivation (AUC 0.82 [95% CI: 0.77, 0.86]), validation (AUC 0.76 [95% CI: 0.66, 0.85]) and test (AUC 0.81 [95% CI: 0.72, 0.88]) cohorts. When compared with Park's model (AUC: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.64, 0.81]) in the test cohort, our grading system demonstrated significantly higher AUC and specificity (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The lesion-based grading system can assess the likelihood of PSM after RALP, assisting surgeons in minimizing the occurrence rate of PSM while optimizing functional preservation.

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: A review of current technology

Prostate cancer (PCa) imaging forms an important part of PCa clinical management. Magnetic resonance imaging is the modality of choice for prostate imaging. Most of the current imaging assessment is qualitative i.e., based on visual inspection and thus subjected to inter-observer disagreement. Quantitative imaging is better than qualitative assessment as it is more objective, and standardized, thus improving interobserver agreement. Apart from detecting PCa, few quantitative parameters may have potential to predict disease aggressiveness, and thus can be used for prognosis and deciding the course of management. There are various magnetic resonance imaging-based quantitative parameters and few of them are already part of PIRADS v.2.1. However, there are many other parameters that are under study and need further validation by rigorous multicenter studies before recommending them for routine clinical practice. This review intends to discuss the existing quantitative methods, recent developments, and novel techniques in detail.

A comparative analysis of techniques for measuring tumor contact length in predicting extraprostatic extension

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of curvilinear and linear measurement methods in different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences for detecting extraprostatic extension (EPE) in prostate cancer, and to evaluate the added value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in detecting EPE.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 84 patients who underwent multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) prior to radical prostatectomy between January 2019 and February 2022. Tumor contact length (TCL) was assessed curvilinearly and linearly on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), ADC maps, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI by two radiologists. MRI-based EPE positivity was defined as a curvilinear or linear contact length of >15 mm. Statistical comparisons were conducted using chi-squared and independent samples t-tests, with interreader agreement evaluated using weighted κ statistics. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of EPE, and two prediction models were constructed. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 32 (38%) and 52 (62%) patients with EPE and non-EPE, respectively, were included in this study. Patients with EPE demonstrated significantly larger tumor sizes, lower ADC values, and lower ADC ratios than those without EPE (p < 0.001). The curvilinear and linear TCL measurements for each sequence exhibited statistically significant correlations with EPE for both readers, with strong interreader agreement. Curvilinear TCL (c-TCL) and linear TCL (l-TCL) on DCE-MRI showed higher area under the curve (AUC) values than the other measurements for EPE prediction (reader 1: 0.815 and 0.803, reader 2: 0.746 and 0.713, respectively). However, there was no statistically significant difference between c-TCL and l-TCL. Multivariable models with mean ADC value improved predictive performance. Model 2 (ADC, ISUP, and c-TCL on DCE images) surpassed model 1 (ADC and c-TCL on DCE images) with an AUC of 0.919 and 0.874, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DCE-MRI demonstrated superior performance in predicting EPE compared to other sequences. Linear and curvilinear measurements had comparable diagnostic performance. Being more practical and easier, radiologists may use l-TCL measurement in daily practice. The mean ADC value provided additional diagnostic value.

Amide proton transfer imaging has added value for predicting extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer patients

Background

Prostate cancer invades the capsule is a key factor in selecting appropriate treatment methods. Accurate preoperative prediction of extraprostatic extension (EPE) can help achieve precise selection of treatment plans.

Purpose

The aim of this study is to verify the diagnostic efficacy of tumor size, length of capsular contact (LCC), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and Amide proton transfer (APT) value in predicting EPE. Additionally, the study aims to investigate the potential additional value of APT for predicting EPE.

Method

This study include 47 tumor organ confined patients (age, 64.16 ± 9.18) and 50 EPE patients (age, 61.51 ± 8.82). The difference of tumor size, LCC, ADC and APT value between groups were compared. Binary logistic regression was used to screen the EPE predictors. The receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance of variables for predicting EPE. The diagnostic efficacy of combined models (model I: ADC+LCC+tumor size; model II: APT+LCC+tumor size; and model III: APT +ADC+LCC+tumor size) were also analyzed.

Results

APT, ADC, tumor size and the LCC were independent predictors of EPE. The area under the curve (AUC) of APT, ADC, tumor size and the LCC were 0.752, 0.665, 0.700 and 0.756, respectively. The AUC of model I, model II, and model III were 0.803, 0.845 and 0.869, respectively. The cutoff value of APT, ADC, tumor size and the LCC were 3.65%, 0.97×10-3mm2/s, 17.30mm and 10.78mm, respectively. The sensitivity/specificity of APT, ADC, tumor size and the LCC were 76%/89.4.0%, 80%/59.6%, 54%/78.9%, 72%/66%, respectively. The sensitivity/specificity of model I, Model II and Model III were 74%/72.3%, 82%/72.5% and 84%/80.9%, respectively.

Data conclusion

Amide proton transfer imaging has added value for predicting EPE. The combination model of APT balanced the sensitivity and specificity.

Quantitative MRI in the Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Local staging of prostate cancer (PCa) is important for treatment planning. Radiologist interpretation using qualitative criteria is variable with high specificity but low sensitivity. Quantitative methods may be useful in the diagnosis of extracapsular extension (ECE).

PURPOSE

To assess the performance of quantitative MRI markers for detecting ECE.

STUDY TYPE

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SUBJECTS

4800 patients from 28 studies with histopathologically confirmed PCa on radical prostatectomy were pooled for meta-analysis. Patients from 46 studies were included for systematic review.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Diffusion-weighted, T2-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 1.5 T or 3 T.

ASSESSMENT

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify studies on diagnostic test accuracy or association of any quantitative MRI markers with ECE. Results extracted by two independent reviewers for tumor contact length (TCL) and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC-mean) were pooled for meta-analysis, but not for other quantitative markers including radiomics due to low number of studies available.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were computed for both TCL and ADC-mean, but summary operating points were computed for TCL only. Heterogeneity was investigated by meta-regression. Results were significant if P ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

At the 10 mm threshold for TCL, summary sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.81] and 0.68 [95% CI 0.63-0.73], respectively. At the 15 mm threshold, summary sensitivity and specificity were 0.70 [95% CI 0.53-0.83] and 0.74 [95% CI 0.60-0.84] respectively. The area under the HSROC curves for TCL and ADC-mean were 0.79 and 0.78, respectively. Significant sources of heterogeneity for TCL included timing of MRI relative to biopsy.

DATA CONCLUSION

Both 10 mm and 15 mm thresholds for TCL may be reasonable for clinical use. From comparison of the HSROC curves, ADC-mean may be superior to TCL at higher sensitivities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

MR-based simplified extraprostatic extension evaluation: comparison of performances of different predictive models

OBJECTIVES

To test reproducibility and predictive value of a simplified score for assessment of extraprostatic tumor extension (sEPE grade).

METHODS

Sixty-five patients (mean age ± SD, 67 years ± 6.3) treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer who underwent 1.5-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) 6 months before surgery were enrolled. sEPE grade was derived from mpMRI metrics: curvilinear contact length > 15 mm (CCL) and capsular bulging/irregularity. The diameter of the index lesion (dIL) was also measured. Evaluations were independently performed by seven radiologists, and inter-reader agreement was tested by weighted Cohen K coefficient. A nested (two levels) Monte Carlo cross-validation was used. The best cut-off value for dIL was selected by means of the Youden J index to classify values into a binary variable termed dIL*. Logistic regression models based on sEPE grade, dIL, and clinical scores were developed to predict pathologic EPE. Results on validation set were assessed by the main metrics of the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) and by decision curve analysis (DCA). Based on our findings, we defined and tested an alternative sEPE grade formulation.

RESULTS

Pathologic EPE was found in 31/65 (48%) patients. Average κ_w was 0.65 (95% CI 0.51-0.79), 0.66 (95% CI 0.48-0.84), 0.67 (95% CI 0.50-0.84), and 0.43 (95% CI 0.22-0.63) for sEPE grading, CLL ≥ 15 mm, dIL*, and capsular bulging/irregularity, respectively. The highest diagnostic yield in predicting EPE was obtained by combining both sEPE grade and dIL*(ROC-AUC 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

sEPE grade is reproducible and when combined with the dIL* accurately predicts extraprostatic tumor extension.

KEY POINTS

• Simple and reproducible mpMRI semi-quantitative scoring system for extraprostatic tumor extension. • sEPE grade accurately predicts extraprostatic tumor extension regardless of reader expertise. • Accurate pre-operative staging and risk stratification for optimized patient management.

The Quantitative Assessment of Using Multiparametric MRI for Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic performance of using quantitative assessment with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for prediction of extraprostatic extension (EPE) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

We performed a computerized search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception until July 31, 2021. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were pooled with the bivariate model, and quality assessment of included studies was performed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. We plotted forest plots to graphically present the results. Multiple subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore the variate clinical settings and heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies with 3,931 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for length of capsular contact (LCC) were 0.79 (95% CI 0.75-0.83) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.73-0.80), for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were 0.71 (95% CI 0.50-0.86) and 0.71 (95% CI 059-0.81), for tumor size were 0.62 (95% CI 0.57-0.67) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.82), and for tumor volume were 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.84) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.56-0.83), respectively. Substantial heterogeneity was presented among included studies, and meta-regression showed that publication year (≤2017 vs. >2017) was the significant factor in studies using LCC as the quantitative assessment (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Four quantitative assessments of LCC, ADC, tumor size, and tumor volume showed moderate to high diagnostic performance of predicting EPE. However, the optimal cutoff threshold varied widely among studies and needs further investigation to establish.

The absolute tumor-capsule contact length in the diagnosis of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. The broad-based capsule-tumor interface has been recognized as one of the worrisome imaging features in multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI). However, there was significant heterogeneity among the measurement method used in prior studies.

OBJECTIVES

This study's objectives were to investigate and compare the accuracy between the curvilinear and linear measurement, find the optimal cut-off contact surface threshold for the diagnosis of EPE, and assess the benefit of the additional contact surface measurement versus visual assessment alone.

METHODS

The status of EPE in mpMRI and the overall PI-RADS were assessed. The tumor's dimensions, the actual tumor-capsule contact length (ACTCL), and the absolute tumor-capsule contact length (ABTCL) were measured. The parameters were analyzed and correlated with the EPE status from prostatectomy specimens.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients who underwent mpMRI followed by prostatectomy were included in the study. High Gleason score (score 8-9), radiologist's impression of EPE, and PI-RADS 5 were significantly correlated with EPE in surgical specimens (p = 0.014, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Both ACTCL and ABTCL of patients with EPE were significantly higher than those without EPE in all imaging sequences (p < 0.001 to p = 0.003). The ABTCL has higher accuracy than the ACTCL. Dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) was the most accurate sequence to measure the contact interface. The recommended cut-off value of ABTCL was 15.0 mm, which had a sensitivity and specificity of 75.86% and 72.09%. Multivariable analysis revealed that the ABTCL > 15 mm and the radiologist's impression on visual assessment were the only two independent predictors for the prediction of EPE (p = 0.048 and p = 0.016, respectively). Improvement of diagnostic performance was achieved when the two factors were combined.

CONCLUSION

The ABTCL has better accuracy than the curvilinear measurement in the prediction of EPE. The optimum sequence for the measurement of the contact surface is the DCE. We recommended using 15.0 mm as a cut-off point.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The addition of the ABTCL measurement showed an increase in diagnostic performance. We encourage radiologists to use the capsular contact measurement in addition to their visual assessment to detect EPE in pre-operative MRI.

Extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: primer for radiologists

The presence of extraprostatic extension (EPE) on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is an important factor in determining the management of prostate cancer. EPE is an established risk factor for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) and patients with EPE may be considered for wider resection margins, non-nerve-sparing surgery, adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Several statistical nomograms and scoring systems have been developed to predict pathological stage at time of RP but with varying accuracies. Using the current PI-RADS v2 mpMRI staging guidelines results in high specificity but lacks in sensitivity. These findings reveal the need for more standardization and further refinement of existing MRI protocols and prostate cancer prediction tools. Current studies have looked into indirect additional imaging criteria such as index tumor volume, length of capsular contact, and apparent diffusion coefficient. Measuring for these features can improve the robustness of mpMRI in staging prostate cancer, as they have been shown to be independent predictors of EPE. MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided targeted biopsy can detect EPE not found on standard biopsy. Collectively, these measurements and imaging techniques can augment the detection of EPE and subsequent risk stratification.

Extraprostatic Tumor Extension: Comparison of Preoperative Multiparametric MRI Criteria and Histopathologic Correlation after Radical Prostatectomy

Background There are no standardized and well-validated criteria for assessing the risk of extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer at preoperative multiparametric MRI. Purpose To compare diagnostic performance, intra- and interreader agreement, and correlations of MRI-based criteria for assessment of EPE after radical prostatectomy, including EPE grade, European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) score, Likert scale, and capsular contact length (CCL). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive men who underwent MRI and radical prostatectomy between July 2016 and March 2017. Two genitourinary radiologists independently estimated the probability of EPE by using four MRI-based scoring methods. The diagnostic accuracies and intra- and interobserver agreement were evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and κ statistics, respectively. Correlations between MRI-based score and histologic extent of EPE were analyzed by using the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ). Results A total of 301 men (mean age ± standard deviation, 65 years ± 7) were evaluated. A total of 129 (42.9%) men had EPE. The AUC ranges of EPE grade, ESUR score, Likert scale, and CCL for assessment of EPE were 0.77-0.81, 0.79-0.81, 0.78-0.79, and 0.78-0.85, respectively, for the two readers. The Likert scale showed lower sensitivity (68.2% [88 of 129] for reader 1, 72.1% [93 of 129] for reader 2) than did EPE grade (77.5% [100 of 129] for reader 1, 79.8% [103 of 129] for reader 2; P ≤ .04). Intra- and interreader agreement were substantial (κ range, 0.61-0.74) for the four methods, with ESUR score showing the lowest values (κ = 0.61 and κ = 0.63, respectively). EPE grade showed highest correlation with histologic extent of EPE (ρ = 0.53 and ρ = 0.55 for circumferential length; ρ = 0.42 and ρ = 0.55 for radial length for readers 1 and 2, respectively; P < .001). Conclusion Extraprostatic extension (EPE) grade, European Society of Urogenital Radiology score, Likert scale, and capsular contact length showed good overall diagnostic performance; however, the EPE grade resulted in more reliable performance and had the highest correlation with histologic EPE extent. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Padhani and Petralia in this issue.

Can Extraprostatic Extension Be Predicted by Tumor-Capsule Contact Length in Prostate Cancer? Relationship With International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to evaluate the relationship between the tumor-capsule contact length, defined as tumor contact length (TCL), and extraprostatic extension (EPE) using the MRI-based TCL measurements and the real TCL measurements from pathology and to determine whether the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group of the tumors influenced this relationship. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this retrospective study, we reviewed prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) studies performed between 2012 and 2018 of 1576 patients and found that 134 patients also underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) after mpMRI. Finally, 86 patients with index lesions in contact with the prostate capsule in RP specimens were enrolled in the study. ROC analysis was used to evaluate the cutoff values of TCLs measured at pathology and TCLs measured on MRI in terms of EPE according to ISUP grade groups. RESULTS. There was no statistically significant cutoff value for pathology-based TCL measurements in individual ISUP grade groups and subgroups. Although not statistically significant, pathology-based TCL cutoff values decreased (from 21.0 to 11.0 mm) as ISUP grade group increased in terms of EPE positivity. When the relationship between MRI-based TCL measurements and EPE was considered, statistically significant cutoff values (range, 14.5-16.6 mm) could be determined in many groups and subgroups with low ISUP grades (sensitivity, 66.7-100%; specificity, 52.8-93.0%; p = 0.006-0.042). However, no statistically significant cutoff value was found for high ISUP grades. CONCLUSION. ISUP grade groups may have an effect on the TCL-EPE relationship. When the MRI-based TCL and EPE relationship is evaluated independent of ISUP grade group, a cutoff value around 15-16 mm may be usable to predict EPE.