The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in a national cohort of rectal cancer patients

Evaluation of the prognostic performance of different cutoff values of lymph node ratio staging system for stage III colorectal cancer

This study attempted to compare the prognostic performance of lymph node ratio (LNR) staging system with different cutoff values relative to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pN staging system in stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). Overall, 45,069 patients from the SEER dataset and 69 patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (the External set) who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor and were diagnosed with stage III CRC by postoperative pathology were included. Patients were divided into three subgroups based on the LNR cutoff used in previous studies, Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted, and log-rank test was used to compare the differences among groups in terms of cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox regression model was applied for survival analysis. To evaluate the discriminatory power of different lymph node staging systems, Harrell's C statistic(C-index) and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) were applied. A set of optimal cutoff values (0.11; 0.36; 0.66) of LNR staging system with the most considerable discriminatory power to the prognosis in patients with stage III CRC (SEER set: C-index = 0.714; AIC = 58,942.46, External set: C-index = 0.809; AIC = 164.36) were obtained, and both were superior to the AJCC pN staging system (SEER set: C-index = 0.708; AIC = 59,071.20, External set: C-index = 0.788; AIC = 167.06). For evaluating the prognostic efficacy of patients with stage III colorectal cancer, the cutoff value (0.11; 0.36; 0.66) of LNR staging system had the best discrimination and prognostic ability, which was superior to LNR staging system under other cutoff values and AJCC pN staging system.

Prediction of survival after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer - a retrospective analysis

Purpose

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to determine if the response to preoperative radio(chemo)therapy is predictive for survival among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and may act as a potential surrogate endpoint for disease free survival and overall survival.

Results

Eight hundred seventy-eight patients from five centers were analyzed. There were 304 women and 574 men; the median age was 64.7 years. 77.6% and 22.4% of patients received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or short-course radiotherapy, resulting in a pathological complete response in 7.3%. T-downstaging and N-downstaging occurred in 50.5% and 37% of patients after neoadjuvant therapy. In patients with T-downstaging, the 10-year DFS and 10-year OS were 64.8% and 66.8% compared to 37.1% and 45.9% in patients without T-downstaging. N-downstaging resulted in 10-year DFS and 10-year OS in 56.2% and 62.5% compared to 47.3% and 52.3% without N-downstaging. Based on routinely evaluated clinical parameters, an absolute risk prediction calculator was generated for 5-year disease-free survival, and 5-year overall survival.

Conclusion

T-downstaging and N-downstaging after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or short-course radiotherapy resulted in better DFS and OS compared to patients without response. Based on clinical parameters, 5-year DFS, and 5-year OS can be predicted using a prediction calculator.

INFLUENCE OF NEOADJUVANT THERAPY ON THE RATIO OF LYMPH NODES

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the relationship between the ratio of affected lymph nodes (LNR) and clinical and anatomopathological variables in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma submitted or not to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

The LNR was determined by dividing the number of compromised LNR by the total number of LNR dissected in the surgical specimen. Patients were divided into two groups: with QRT and without QRT. In each group, the relationship between LNR and the following variables was evaluated: degree of cell differentiation, depth of invasion in the rectal wall, angiolymphatic /perineural invasion, degree of tumor regression and occurrence of metastases. The LNR was evaluated in patients with more than 1, LNR (LNR >12) or less (LNR<12) in the surgical specimen with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The results were expressed as the mean with the respective standard deviation. Qualitative variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, while quantitative variables were analyzed using the Kruskal -Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. The significance level was 5%.

RESULTS

We evaluated 282 patients with QRT and 114 without QRT, between 1995-2011. In the QRT Group, LNR showed a significant association with mucinous tumors (P=0.007) and degree of tumor regression (P=0.003). In both groups, LNR was associated with poorly differentiated tumors (P=0.001, P=0.02), presence of angiolymphatic invasion (P<0.0001 and P=0.01), perineural (P=0.0007, P=0.02), degree of rectal wall invasion (T3>T2; P<0.0001, P=0.02); Compromised LNR (P<0.0001, P<0.01), metastases (P<0.0001, P<0.01). In patients with QRT, LNR<12 was associated with DFS (5.889; 95%CI1.935-19.687; P=0.018) and LNR>12 with DFS and OS (17.984; 95%CI5.931-54.351; P<0.001 and 10.286; 95%CI 2.654-39.854; P=0.007, respectively).

CONCLUSION

LNR was associated with histological aspects of poor prognosis, regardless of the use of QRT. In the occurrence of less than 12 evaluated LNR, the LNR was associated only with the DFS.

BACKGROUND

• Assessment of the lymph nodes during pathological analysis of the surgical specimen is crucial to determine treatment and prognosis.

BACKGROUND

• Neoadjuvance therapy reduces the number of lymph nodes, being lower than recommended, therefore the lymph node ratio can be an alternative analysis for a better prognosis.

A new lymph node ratio-based staging system for rectosigmoid cancer: a retrospective study with external validation

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the clinical value of a new American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging prediction model based on lymph node ratio (LNR) in rectosigmoid cancer (RSC).

METHODS

The analysis included 1444 patients with nonmetastatic RSC diagnosed pathologically between 2010 and 2016 who were collected from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Results database. The AJCC N-stage was redefined according to the LNR cutoff point, and the ability of the new staging system to predict prognosis was compared with that of the AJCC TNM staging system. Data from 739 patients from our hospital were used for external validation.

RESULTS

According to the number of examined lymph nodes and LNR, the N stage was divided into five groups (LNR0-5). The 5-year OS of patients divided according to the new T lymph node ratio M (TLNRM) staging into stage I (T1LNR1, T1LNR2), IIA (T1LNR3, T2LNR1, T2LNR2, T2LNR3, T1LNR4, T3LNR1), IIB (T2LNR4), IIC (T3LNR2, T4a LNR1, T1LNR5), IIIA (T3LNR3, T2LNR5, T4b LNR1, T4a LNR2, T3LNR4), IIIB (T3LNR5, T4a LNR3, T4a LNR4, T4b LNR2), and IIIC (T4b LNR3, T4a LNR5, T4b LNR4, T4b LNR5) was significantly different ( P <0.05). Decision curve analysis showed that the net income of the new TLNRM staging system for different decision thresholds was higher than the prediction line of the traditional eighth TNM staging system. The smaller Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information suggested that the new staging system had a higher sensitivity for predicting prognosis than the traditional staging system. TLNRM II and III patients benefited from adjuvant chemotherapy, while adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the prognosis of TNM II patients. These findings were confirmed by the external validation data.

CONCLUSION

The new TLNRM staging system was superior to the eighth edition AJCC staging system for staging and predicting the prognosis of patients with RSC and may become an effective tool in clinical practice.

Lymph node ratio as a survival predictor for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with multiple adverse pathological features

BACKGROUND

The study investigates the prognostic significance of lymph node ratio (LNR) on patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with coexistence of multiple adverse pathological features.

METHODS

In total, 100 patients with coexistence of perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and extranodal extension of first primary HNSCC treated with radical surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were enrolled.

RESULTS

The optimal LNR cut-off value for predicting overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) was 7%. In Cox model, we observed that LNR ≥7% was a statistically significant unfavorable predictor of OS (HR: 2.689; 95% CI: 1.228-5.889; p = 0.013) and CSS (HR: 3.162; 95% CI: 1.234-8.102; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

For HNSCC patients with coexistence of multiple adverse pathological features, LNR is an independent survival predictor. Novel intensified treatments are needed for the subgroup of patients with a high LNR.

Beyond N staging in colorectal cancer: Current approaches and future perspectives

Traditionally, lymph node metastases (LNM) evaluation is essential to the staging of colon cancer patients according to the TNM (tumor–node–metastasis) system. However, in recent years evidence has accumulated regarding the role of emerging pathological features, which could significantly impact the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients. Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) and Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes (LODDS) have been shown to predict patients’ prognosis more accurately than traditional nodal staging and it has been suggested that their implementation in existing classification could help stratify further patients with overlapping TNM stage. Tumor deposits (TD) are currently factored within the N1c category of the TNM classification in the absence of lymph node metastases. However, studies have shown that presence of TDs can affect patients’ survival regardless of LNM. Moreover, evidence suggest that presence of TDs should not be evaluated as dichotomic but rather as a quantitative variable. Extranodal extension (ENE) has been shown to correlate with presence of other adverse prognostic features and to impact survival of colorectal cancer patients. In this review we will describe current staging systems and prognostic/predictive factors in colorectal cancer and elaborate on available evidence supporting the implementation of LNR/LODDS, TDs and ENE evaluation in existing classification to improve prognosis estimation and patient selection for adjuvant treatment.

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in resectable rectal cancer after preoperative short-course radiotherapy-results from randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

The value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with rectal cancer has not yet been unequivocally established. This study aims to assess the effect of the lymph node ratio on the prognosis of rectal cancer in patients operated after short-course preoperative 25 Gy radiotherapy, at 10-year follow-up.

METHODS

This is a substudy based on data from a prospective randomized clinical trial. A total of 141 patients with resectable rectal cancer were included. Lymph node yield was compared in patients with short and long time intervals between radiotherapy and surgery. Survival curves were compared between patients with different ypN and LNR categories. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Survival and recurrence data were available for a median follow-up of 11.6 years. The lymph node yield did not differ significantly between the patients in the short- and long-interval groups. A greater difference in 10-year survival was observed in patients with LNR ≤ 0.41 and > 0.41 when compared to the ypN categories. Separate prognostic factor analyses were performed for the entire population and for subgroups that had < 12 and 12 lymph nodes resected. LNR was identified as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, in multivariate analyses, for all patients and those with less than 12 retrieved lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

The lymph node yield is comparable in patients with different time intervals between radiation therapy and surgery. LNR better discriminates patients in terms of overall survival than ypN categories.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01444495, date of registration: September 30, 2011.

Prognostic analysis of lymph node ratio of patients with disease recurrence previously submitted to cervical dissection surgery for head and neck cancer

INTRODUCTION

the variable lymph node ratio has recently been studied as a possible influencer in the survival of patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVE

to analyze the correlation between lymph node density and survival of recurred disease patients previously submitted to cervical dissection surgery due to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

METHOD

we retrospectively analyzed 71 medical records of patients treated at the Head and Neck Surgery Service of the Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas who had undergone cervical dissection surgery and presented tumor recurrence between 2006 and 2019. Patient and tumor data such as age, gender, skin color, smoking, alcohol consumption, location of the primary tumor, anatomopathological characteristics and lymph node status were correlated with the survival time.

RESULTS

we found a predominance of males and the mean age was 59.5 years. The most frequent primary site was the oral cavity followed by the larynx and oropharynx. The mortality rate was 53.52% and the mean lymph node ratio 0.28. We found influence on survival with statistical significance for the parameters: lymph node ratio, number of dissected and affected lymph nodes, T and N staging, type of treatment proposed (palliative or surgical), presence of compromited margins in the primary tumor and lymph node extravasation.

CONCLUSION

the calculation of lymph node density in patients with recurred disease after cervical dissection surgery by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma should be taken into account during therapeutic planning and prognostic evaluation due to its direct influence on the survival.

Análise prognóstica da densidade linfonodal de pacientes recidivados previamente submetidos à cirurgia de esvaziamento cervical por neoplasia de cabeça e pescoço

RESUMO Introdução: recentemente tem-se estudado a variável densidade linfonodal como possível influenciador na sobrevida de pacientes com diagnóstico de câncer de cabeça e pescoço. Objetivo: analisar a relação entre a densidade linfonodal e a sobrevida de pacientes recidivados previamente submetidos a cirurgia de esvaziamento cervical por carcinoma espinocelular de cabeça e pescoço. Método: foram analisados retrospectivamente 71 prontuários pacientes atendidos no Serviço de Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas que tinham sido submetidos a cirurgia de esvaziamento cervical e apresentaram recidiva tumoral entre os anos de 2006 e 2019. Dados relativos ao paciente e ao tumor tais como: idade, sexo, cor da pele, tabagismo, etilismo, localização do tumor primário, características anatomopatológicas e status linfonodal foram correlacionados ao tempo de sobrevida dos indivíduos. Resultados: encontramos predominância do sexo masculino e a média de idade foi de 59,5 anos. O sítio primário mais frequente foi a cavidade oral seguido da laringe e orofaringe. A taxa de mortalidade foi de 53,52% e a densidade linfonodal média 0,28. Encontramos influência na sobrevida com significância estatística para os parâmetros: densidade linfonodal, número de linfonodos dissecados e acometidos, estadiamento T e N, tipo de tratamento proposto (paliativo ou cirúrgico), presença de margens comprometidas no tumor primário e extravasamento linfonodal. Conclusão: o cálculo da densidade linfonodal em pacientes recidivados após cirurgia de esvaziamento cervical por carcinoma espinocelular de cabeça e pescoço deve ser levado em consideração durante o planejamento terapêutico e na avaliação prognóstica devido à sua direta influencia na sobrevida dos indivíduos.

Prognostic implications of ENE and LODDS in relation to lymph node-positive colorectal cancer location

•

This is the first study on LODDS and ENE together. The current study showed that LODDS and ENE are liable prognostic parameters of CRC or CC.

•

ENE is an independent influencing factor on the prognosis of both CRC and CC, and the prognostic impact of ENE was observed in both CRC and CC.

•

The frequency of ENE increases from the proximal (right) to the distal (left) colon as well as the rectum.

Background

Extranodal extension (ENE) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) are associated with the aggressiveness of both colon and rectal cancers. The current study evaluated the clinicopathological significance and the prognostic impact of ENE and LODDS in the colon and rectal patients independently.

Methods

The clinical and histological records of 389 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who underwent curative surgery were reviewed.

Results

For the ENE system, 244 patients were in the ENE1 group and 145 in the ENE2 system. Compared with the ENE1 system, the patients included in the ENE2 system were prone to nerve invasion (P < 0.001) and vessel invasion (P < 0.001) with higher TNM (P = 0.009), higher T category (P = 0.003), higher N category (P < 0.001), advanced differentiation (P = 0.013), more number of positive lymph nodes (NPLN) (P < 0.001), more lymph node ratio (LNR) (P < 0.001), and a higher value of LODDS (P < 0.001). ENE was more frequent in patients with left and rectal than right cancer. For the LODDS system, 280 patients were in the LODDS1 group, and 109 in the LODDS2 group. Compared to the LODDS1 group, the patients included in the LODDS2 group were more prone to nerve invasion (P = 0.0351) and vessel invasion (P < 0.001) with a higher rate of N2 stage, less NDLN (P < 0.001), more NPLN (P < 0.001), more LNR (P < 0.001), and a higher value of ENE (P < 0.001). Based on the results in the univariable analysis, the N, NPLN, LNR, LODDS, and ENE were separately incorporated into five different Cox regression models combined with the same confounders. The multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that all the five staging systems were independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

Conclusion

The current study confirmed that the LODDS stage is an independent influence on the prognosis of both CRC and CC patients. ENE is an independent influencing factor on the prognosis of both CRC and CC patients, and the prognostic impact of extracapsular lymph node was observed in both CRC and CC. The frequency of ENE increases from the proximal (right) to the distal (left) colon as well as the rectum. Therefore, combining ENE and LODDS into the current TNM system to compensate for the inadequacy of pN staging needs further investigation.

Prognostic importance of lymph node count and ratio in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Results from a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of lymph node count (LNC) and lymph node ratio (LNR) in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

Patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT and total mesorectal excision (TME) for Stage I-III rectal cancer were selected from a cross-sectional study including 71 Dutch centres. Primary outcome parameters were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Prognostic significance of LNC and LNR (cut-off values 0.15, 0.20, 0.30) was tested for different (sub)groups.

RESULTS

From 2095 registered patients, 458 were included, of which 240 patients with LNC < 12 and 218 patients with LNC ≥ 12. LNC was not significantly associated with DFS (p = 0.35) and OS (p = 0.59). In univariable analysis, LNR was significantly associated with DFS and OS in the whole cohort and LNC subgroups, but not in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

LNC was not associated with long-term oncological outcome in rectal cancer patients treated with CRT, nor was LNR when corrected for N-stage. However, LNR might be used to identify subgroups of node-positive patients with a favourable outcome.

Defining a minimum number of examined lymph nodes improves the prognostic value of lymphadenectomy in pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) metastasis is associated with decreased survival following resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In N0 disease, increasing total evaluated LN (ELN) correlates with improved outcomes suggesting patients may be understaged when LNs are undersampled. We aim to assess the optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELN) following pancreatectomy.

METHODS

Data from 1837 patients undergoing surgery were prospectively collected. The binomial probability law was utilized to analyze the minimum number of examined LNs (minELN) and accurately characterize each histopathologic stage. LN ratio (LNR) was compared to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines.

RESULTS

As ELN total increased, the likelihood of finding node positive disease increased. An evaluation based upon the binomial probability law suggested an optimal minELN of 12 for accurate AJCC N staging. As the number of ELNs increased, the discriminatory capacity of alternative strategies to characterize LN disease exceeded that offered by AJCC N stage.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study dedicated to optimizing histopathologic staging in PDAC using models of minELN informed by the binomial probability law. This study highlights two separate cutoffs for ELNs depending upon prognostic goal and validates that 12 LNs are adequate to determine AJCC N stage for the majority of patients.

Construction of a clinical survival prognostic model for middle-aged and elderly patients with stage III rectal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Nomograms for prognosis prediction in colorectal cancer patients are few, and prognostic indicators differ with age.

AIM

To construct a new nomogram survival prediction tool for middle-aged and elderly patients with stage III rectal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 2773 eligible patients were divided into the training cohort (70%) and the validation cohort (30%). Optimal cutoff values were calculated using the X-tile software for continuous variables. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to determine overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS)-related prognostic factors. Two nomograms were successfully constructed. The discriminant and predictive ability and clinical usefulness of the model were also assessed by multiple methods of analysis.

RESULTS

The 95%CI in the training group was 0.719 (0.690-0.749) and 0.733 (0.702-0.74), while that in the validation group was 0.739 (0.696-0.782) and 0.750 (0.701-0.800) for the OS and CSS nomogram prediction models, respectively. In the validation group, the AUC of the three-year survival rate was 0.762 and 0.770, while the AUC of the five-year survival rate was 0.722 and 0.744 for the OS and CSS nomograms, respectively. The nomogram distinguishes all-cause mortality from cancer-specific mortality in patients with different risk grades. The time-dependent AUC and decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram had good clinical predictive ability and decision efficacy and was significantly better than the tumor-node-metastases staging system.

CONCLUSION

The survival prediction model constructed in this study is helpful in evaluating the prognosis of patients and can aid physicians in clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio versus American Joint Committee on Cancer N classification for surgically resected human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We compared prognostic values of lymph node ratio (LNR) and AJCC 8 N classification in surgically resected human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients with HPV-associated OPSCC from 2010 to 2016 who underwent definitive surgical resection. Patients were analyzed by nodal grouping (LNR, N stage) and adjuvant radiation therapy(RT). Primary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

We identified 4166 patients. Survival analysis showed significant improvement for LNR≤6% versus >6% (5 year OS% 92.7% vs. 83.7%, p < 0.001). N classification demonstrated good prognostic ability (5 year OS% for pN0, pN1, pN2 were 91.3%, 90.1%, 78.8%, p < 0.001), but poor separation among stages (compared to pN0: pN1 HR 1.40 [95% CI 0.63, 3.09], p = 0.41; pN2 HR 2.50 [95% CI 1.08, 5.81], p = 0.033). RT improved survival in the LNR > 6% group (5 year OS% 85.4% vs. 74.9%, p < 0.001; HR 0.41 [95% CI 0.28, 0.58], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LNR should be considered an adjunct category in future staging systems for HPV-associated OPSCC.

The prognostic significance of the treatment response of regional lymph nodes and the refinement of the current TNM staging system in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

The current TNM staging system uses the same category definitions for both rectal cancer patients with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). However, ypTNM stage, especially ypN stage does not predict patient survival after NCRT well. Whether tumor regression in lymph nodes (LRG) may improve the prediction has not been well studied. In total, 358 patients with rectal cancer who received NCRT followed by radical resection were recruited from 2004 to 2015, and the median follow‐up time was 57.5 months. The main outcome measure was disease‐free survival (DFS). In univariate analysis, factors associated with DFS were ypT stage, ypN stage, number of negative lymph nodes (NLN), lymph node ratio (LNR), tumor regression grade (TRG), M‐TTRG (modified ypT stage by combining ypT stage and TRG), maximum LRG (LRGmax), sum score of LRG (LRGsum), LRG ratio (average value of LRGsum), and M‐NLRG (modified ypN stage by combining LRGmax and LNR). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, M‐TTRG and M‐NLRG (p < 0.001 and p = 0.030, respectively) were significantly associated with DFS. The estimated 5‐year DFS rates were 86.6%, 60.3%, and 36.4% for patients with M‐NLRG‐0, M‐NLRG‐1, and M‐NLRG‐2, respectively (p < 0.001). A significant difference in survival was observed among patients with NCRT after incorporating TRG and LRG simultaneously into the current ypTNM staging system (p < 0.001). LRG was an important prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients treated with NCRT and could refine the ypTNM staging system. The modified ypTNM staging system in combination with LRGmax, LNR, and TRG could improve the DFS prediction in each subset of patients.

Comparison of four lymph node staging systems for predicting prognosis for stage IV rectum cancer

Background

With recommendation of surgical management in primary site, both the positive and negative lymph nodes (LNs) retrieved have been emphasized to predict prognosis in stage IV rectum cancer. Therefore, we attempt to compare the prognostic performance of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) N-stage relative to lymph node ratio (LNR), log odds of metastatic lymph nodes (LODDS), and N-score in stage IV rectal cancer.

Methods

Total 5,090 patients taken surgical resection of primary site in rectum cancer with distant metastasis were extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Harrell's C statistic (C-index) and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) were used to evaluate the discriminative ability of the different LN staging systems.

Results

Of the 3,243 patients without radiotherapy, 82.46% (n=2,675) had been found with lymph nodes metastasis with median number of 16 lymph nodes collected (IQR: 11-22). Modeled as categorical cutoff variables for further clinical usage, when number of LNs was between 12 and 25 (C-index: 0.5997, AIC: 1,698.015), 8^th AJCC N-stage outperformed other three schemas with increasing C-index and less AIC value. Assessed as continuous values, the LODDS shown as the best schemas with greatest discriminatory power (C-index: 0.5971, AIC: 3,680.017), generally. On the other hand, in the cohorts of other 1274 patients taken radiation, the median number of lymph nodes retrieved was 13 (IQR: 9-18). LODDS still remained remarkable performance as continuous (C-index: 0.5912; AIC: 1,058.765) and categorical variables (C-index: 0.5700; AIC: 1,061.703), while N-staging outperformed with less than 25 lymph nodes retrieved (LNs <12 C-index: 0.5678, AIC: 481.94; 12< LNs <25 C-index: 0.5933, AIC: 390.395).

Conclusions

When assessed as categorical variables, N-stage performed superiorly with adequate lymph nodes examined, whether the patients have got radiotherapy prior to surgery or not. LODDS showed, when assessed as a continuous variable, good discriminative ability and goodness of fit in predicting survival for stage IV rectum cancer patients regardless of radiation therapy status.

Comparison of Different Lymph Node Staging Systems in Patients With Resectable Colorectal Cancer

Background and Objectives: Currently, the United States Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) N staging, lymph node positive rate (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) are the main lymph node (LN) staging systems. However, the type of LN staging system that is more accurate in terms of prognostic performance remains controversial. We compared the prognostic accuracy of the three staging systems in patients with CRC and determine the best choice for clinical applications. Methods: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 56,747 patients were identified who were diagnosed with CRC between 2004 and 2013. Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) and Harrell's Consistency Index (c-index) were used to assess the relative discriminative abilities of different LN staging systems. Results: In 56,747 patients, when using classification cut-off values for evaluation, the LNR of Rosenberg et al. showed significantly better predictive power, especially when the number of dissected lymph nodes (NDLN) were insufficient. When analyzed as a continuous variable, the LODDS staging system performed the best and was not affected by the NDLN. Conclusions: We suggest that the LNR of Rosenberg et al. should be introduced into the AJCC system as a supplement when the NDLN is insufficient until the optimal LODDS cut-off values are calculated.

Predictive Value of the Number of Harvested Lymph Nodes and Cut-Off for Lymph Node Ratio in the Prognosis of Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer Patients

Purpose/aim: The appropriate staging of colorectal cancer requires at least 12 lymph nodes to be sampled. We evaluated whether lymph node sampling (LNS) and lymph node ratio (LNR) can predict the prognosis of stage II-III patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study on 432 patients classified in LNS ≥12 and LNS <12. Disease-free survival (DFS) was computed using the Kaplan-Meier method. We stratified stage III patients into 4 quartiles base on LNR values. To determine the optimal LNR cut-off, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed.

RESULTS

There was a positive association between the number of lymph node sampled and the number of metastatic lymph nodes (p < 0.01). Among stage II patients, the DFS was 81% for LNS ≥ 12 and 72% for LNS < 12 (p = 0.158). Among stage III patients, the DFS was 58% (p < 0.001). We found a significant association between LNR quartiles and relapse in stage III patients but only in the LNS ≥ 12 group. ROC curve analysis indicated an ideal LNR cut-off value at 0.194 (sensitivity 65% and specificity 61%). The DFS of patients with LNR below 0.194 was 71%, and that of patients with LNR above 0.194 was 45% (log-rank test, p < 0.001). In the patients with LNS ≥ 12, the cut-off of 0.257 could predict recurrence (specificity 86%).

CONCLUSIONS

Stage II patients with LNS < 12 tend to have shorter DFS than stage II patients with LNS ≥ 12. In stage III patients, an appropriate LNR cut-off is a better prognostic predictor than LNR quartile, especially in patients with LNS ≥ 12.

Role of lymph node yield and lymph node ratio in predicting outcomes in non-metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

Lymph node yield (LNY) of 12 or more in resection of colorectal cancer is recommended in current international guidelines. Although a low LNY (less than 12) is associated with poorer outcome in some studies, its prognostic value is unclear in patients with early‐stage colorectal or rectal cancer with a complete pathological response following neoadjuvant therapy. Lymph node ratio (LNR), which reflects the proportion of positive to total nodes obtained, may be more accurate in predicting outcome in stage III colorectal cancer. This study aimed to identify factors correlating with LNY and evaluate the prognostic role of LNY and LNR in colorectal cancer.

Methods

An observational study was performed on patients with colorectal cancer treated at three hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, from January 2010 to March 2016. Association of LNY and LNR with clinical variables was analysed using linear regression. Disease‐free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival were investigated with Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses.

Results

Some 1585 resections were analysed. Median follow‐up was 27·1 (range 0·1–71) months. Median LNY was 16 (range 0–86), and was lower for rectal cancers, decreased with increasing age, and increased with increasing stage. High LNY (12 or more) was associated with better DFS in colorectal cancer. Subgroup analysis indicated that low LNY was associated with poorer DFS and OS in stage III colonic cancer, but had no effect on DFS and OS in rectal cancer (stages I–III). Higher LNR was predictive of poorer DFS and OS.

Conclusion

Low LNY (less than 12) was predictive of poor DFS in stage III colonic cancer, but was not a factor for stage I or II colonic disease or any rectal cancer. LNR was a predictive factor in DFS and OS in stage III colonic cancer, but influenced DFS only in rectal cancer.

Prognostic accuracy of different lymph node staging systems in rectal adenocarcinoma with or without preoperative radiation therapy

Background and objective

A variety of different lymph node (LN) staging systems have been developed to describe the lymph node status accurately. We aim to compare the prognostic accuracy of American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh N stage relative to negative number of lymph node (nLN), lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes (LODDS) in rectal adenocarcinoma (RC).

Methods

A total of 19 167 Stage II-III rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection of rectal adenocarcinoma were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) and the Harrell's concordance index (c statistic) were used to evaluate the relative discriminative power of the different LN staging systems.

Results

Of the 19 167 patients, 10 958 received preoperative radiotherapy (pre-RT cohort) and 8209 patients were treated with surgical resection directly (SURG cohort). When assessed using categorical cutoff values, LNR has a somewhat better prognostic accuracy both in pre-RT (c-index: 0.62; AIC: 2988.6) and SURG groups (c-index: 0.60; AIC: 3359.8). Further analysis based on different total number of lymph node (TNLN) suggested that when less than 10 lymph nodes were retrieved, LNR exhibited significant superiority (pre-RT: c-index: 0.597, AIC: 1006.8; SURG: c-index: 0.560, AIC: 810.5). When analyzed as a continuous variable, the LODDS system performed the best and was not impacted by TNLN.

Conclusion

When assessed as a categorical variable, LNR was the most powerful method to predict survival for Stage II-III RC patients with limited TNLN. Rather, LODDS was the most accurate staging system regardless of the TNLN when LN status was modeled as continuous variable.

Comparison of two novel staging systems with the TNM system in predicting stage III colon cancer survival

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Adaptations of the TNM staging system that incorporate the Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) have been proposed for stage III colon cancer. This study compared the concordance of two novel staging systems and the TNM system with observed survival outcomes in stage III patients.

METHODS

A review of patients who underwent surgery for stage III colon cancer between January 2002 and April 2015 at a tertiary care centre was performed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 5-year overall (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) rates, and the concordance probability was calculated to evaluate the discriminatory power of the staging systems.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-one patients were identified. For TNM stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC, 5-year OS was 83.4%, 67.6%, and 38.3%, respectively (P < 0.001). All three staging systems were independently predictive of OS and DFS (P < 0.001). However, the novel staging system by Sugimoto et al¹⁸ was the most favourable prognostic tool, with a concordance of 0.646 for DFS and 0.659 for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel staging system by Sugimoto et al¹⁸ was superior to the TNM system. Incorporating LNR into staging models for node positive colon cancers may improve survival information available to patients and potentially aid treatment decisions.

Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymph node ratio (LNR) is increasingly reported as a potential prognostic tool. The purpose of this review was to analyze the available literature on the prognostic significance of LNR in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

A PubMed internet search was performed and articles meeting selection criteria were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were identified in the literature dealing with the prognostic value of LNR. The published results are variable with a range of cutoff values of LNR associated with prognosis (overall survival [OS] and/or disease-specific survival [DSS]) between 0.02 and 0.20, with an average of 0.09.

CONCLUSION

The LNR is reported to be of value in assessing prognosis in the patients with HNSCC. Although it is easy to calculate and could be considered in the staging of these patients, the currently available evidence in the literature does not yet provide a solid base for implementation.

Intensified preoperative chemoradiation by adding oxaliplatin in locally advanced, primary operable (cT3NxM0) rectal cancer : Impact on long-term outcome. Results of the phase II TAKO 05/ABCSG R‑02 trial

Purpose

The major goals of preoperative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancers (LARCs) are improvement of local tumor control, tumor downsizing, and downstaging. Modifications with respect to standardized chemoradiation protocol, e. g., integrating oxaliplatin, are realized with the aim of improving primary tumor response and patient outcome.

Patients and methods

In this phase II multicenter study, patients with LARC of the mid- or lower rectum, cT3cNxcM0 as staged by MRI, were included and treated preoperatively with a combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin following a standardized protocol during radiation. The focus of this long-term analysis was overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

A total of 60 patients (19 women, 41 men, median age 60.5 years) were initially enrolled, 1 patient was excluded (violation of study protocol), and 1 was patient lost of follow-up, leading to a total of 58 patients for long-term analysis. The 3‑year OS was 85.5%; 3‑year DFS 71.2%. Over time, 15 patients (25.9%) developed tumor recurrence (1 locoregional, 6.7%; 11 distant, 73.3%; 3 locoregional+distant, 20%). Recurrence-specific therapy was planned in the majority of patients, in 9 of 15 patients (60%) with a radical surgical approach. Of these, 4 patients (44.4%) are again tumor-free at the end of investigation. While tumor downsizing (T level) or pathologically complete response did not influence patient survival, lymph node negativity (LNneg) after preoperative chemoradiation showed significant influence.

Conclusion

LNneg after preoperative treatment for LARC significantly influences patient survival. A radical surgical approach for recurrent LARC (locoregional, distant) should be contemplated when possible as we were able to clearly demonstrate its importance and efficacy.