1
|
Pastier C, De Hingh IHJT, Goéré D. New insights in the management of pseudomyxoma peritonei. J Surg Oncol 2024. [PMID: 39206531 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2024] [Revised: 08/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
While a rare entity, peritoneal pseudomyxoma treatment evolves. Decision-making criteria improve with imaging development and exploratory laparoscopy. Surgery remains at the core of the therapeutic strategy whatever disease progression. Complete cytoreduction plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is standard of care. Iterative cytoreduction or debulking is sometimes justified. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy modalities change with early postoperative HIPEC or pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. Systemic or local treatment such as new chemo/immuno-therapies or BromAc should improve outcomes. Expertise and multicentric cooperation are more than ever needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clément Pastier
- Department of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Saint-Louis Hospital AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - I H J T De Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Diane Goéré
- Department of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Saint-Louis Hospital AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nakamura B, Senguttuvan R, Ruel NH, Frankel PH, Yost SE, Cole S, Chang S, Jung A, Eng M, Tinsley R, Stewart D, Wang E, Cohen J, Villella J, Whelan RL, Merchea A, DePeralta DK, Cristea M, Wakabayashi MT, Raoof M, Dellinger TH. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) experience in patients with recurrent low grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC): sub-cohort report of phase 1 clinical trial. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1404936. [PMID: 39148906 PMCID: PMC11324501 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1404936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Low grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a rare subtype of ovarian cancer (OC) that is challenging to treat due to its relative chemoresistance. Given that LGSOC patients often recur in the peritoneal cavity, novel intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy should be explored. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a method that has demonstrated peritoneal disease control in cancers with peritoneal metastases. Methods NCT04329494 is a US multicenter phase 1 trial evaluating the safety of PIPAC in recurrent ovarian, uterine, and GI cancers with peritoneal metastases. This analysis describes the outcomes of a sub-cohort of four LGSOC patients treated with IP cisplatin 10.5 mg/m2, doxorubicin 2.1 mg/m2 PIPAC q4-6 weeks. Primary endpoints included dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and incidence of adverse events (AE). Secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and treatment response based on radiographic, intraoperative, and pathological findings. Results Four patients with LGSOC were enrolled of which three were heavily pretreated. Median prior lines of therapy was 5 (range 2-10). Three patients had extraperitoneal metastases, and two patients had baseline partial small bowel obstructive (SBO) symptoms. Median age of patients was 58 (38-68). PIPAC completion rate (≥2 PIPACs) was 75%. No DLTs or Clavien-Dindo surgical complications occurred. No G4/G5 AEs were observed, and one G3 abdominal pain was reported. One patient had a partial response after 3 cycles of PIPAC and completed an additional 3 cycles with compassionate use amendment. Two patients came off study after 2 cycles due to extraperitoneal progressive disease. One patient came off study after 1 cycle due to toxicity. Median decrease in peritoneal carcinomatosis index between cycles 1 and 2 was 5.0%. Ascites decreased in 2 out of 3 patients who had ≥2 PIPACs. Median PFS was 4.3 months (1.7-21.6), median overall survival was 11.6 months (5.4-30.1), and objective response rate was 25%. Conclusion PIPAC with cisplatin/doxorubicin is well tolerated in LGSOC patients without baseline SBO symptoms. IP response was seen in 2 out of 3 patients that completed ≥2 PIPAC cycles. Further study of PIPAC for patients with recurrent disease limited to the IP cavity and with no partial SBO symptoms should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad Nakamura
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Rosemary Senguttuvan
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Nora H Ruel
- Department of Computation and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Paul H Frankel
- Department of Computation and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Susan E Yost
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Sarah Cole
- Clinical Protocol Development, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Sue Chang
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Alexander Jung
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Melissa Eng
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Raechelle Tinsley
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Daphne Stewart
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Edward Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Joshua Cohen
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Jeannine Villella
- Department of Surgery, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Richard L Whelan
- Department of Surgery, Northwell Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Amit Merchea
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | | | | | | | - Mustafa Raoof
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Thanh Hue Dellinger
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mogal H, Shen P. Top Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Articles from 2022 to Inform your Cancer Practice. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:5361-5369. [PMID: 38700798 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15304-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Over the last few decades, the role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without regional-based peritoneal therapies such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has evolved in the management of patients with peritoneal surface malignances (PSMs). Despite the benefit of CRS in improving oncologic outcomes, significant challenges remain in the treatment of patients with advanced PSMs, and the role of HIPEC continues to be questioned. Additionally, while there has been improvement in perioperative outcomes, long-term survival remains poor. As a result, there is much need to improve our understanding of the processes that drive tumor biology, thereby improving patient selection for various treatment approaches. Additionally, newer therapies are needed for patients who remain poor surgical candidates and who progress on systemic therapy. This article highlights recently published studies that we consider impactful in the care of patients with PSMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harveshp Mogal
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Washington/Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Perry Shen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aulicino M, Orsini C, D’Annibale G, Barberis L, Catania P, Abatini C, Attalla El Halabieh M, Ferracci F, Lodoli C, Santullo F, Pacelli F, Di Giorgio A. How to Implement Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy into a National Health System Scenario: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Costs and Economic Sustainability at a High-Volume Italian Hospital. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2637. [PMID: 39123365 PMCID: PMC11312094 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2024] [Revised: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PIPAC is a new surgical procedure and a viable treatment option for PSM patients, due to promising therapeutic outcomes, minimal invasiveness, limited surgical morbidity, and systemic toxicity side effects. However, its implementation throughout hospitals is hard to obtain due to its fragile economical sustainability. A retrospective health economic analysis was conducted in order to evaluate the cost of hospitalization for patients undergoing PIPAC treatment at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, in Rome. The average cost of a PIPAC procedure was defined based on the cost of surgery (cost of surgical material, operating room, intraperitoneal chemotherapy), hospital stay, diagnostic examinations, and drugs used during the stay. A total of 493 PIPAC procedures were performed on 222 patients with peritoneal metastases or primary peritoneal cancer from 2017 to 2023. Since the mean remuneration for each PIPAC hospitalization is €5916 and the mean expenditure per hospitalization is €6538, this results in an operating profit per PIPAC hospitalization of -€622. The reimbursement of PIPAC treatment by the Italian National Health System currently only partially covers the hospital's costs. Development of specific codes and adequate reimbursement for PIPAC by recognizing this procedure as a proper treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Aulicino
- General Surgery Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Cecilia Orsini
- General Surgery Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio D’Annibale
- General Surgery Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Barberis
- General Surgery Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Catania
- General Surgery Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Abatini
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Miriam Attalla El Halabieh
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Ferracci
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Lodoli
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Santullo
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Pacelli
- General Surgery Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abbas M, Ramspott JP, Chourio Barboza DE, Pascher A, Wardelmann E, Sporn JC. Modified scoring system for the quantitative assessment of histological regression in peritoneal carcinomatosis after pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: A pilot study. Oncol Lett 2024; 28:308. [PMID: 38784603 PMCID: PMC11112145 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis is one of the leading causes of death in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Newer locoregional treatment concepts include pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), the regional application of pressurized chemotherapeutic agents to the abdominal cavity, which is usually performed every 4 to 8 weeks. One of the main challenges of PIPAC therapy remains the objective assessment of treatment response. The present study describes a new scoring system to histologically assess the regression of peritoneal cancer following PIPAC therapy, quantitative assessment of histological regression in peritoneal carcinomatosis (QARP). Peritoneal biopsies from 27 patients with peritoneal metastases undergoing PIPAC were obtained and processed in a standardized fashion. Biopsies were scored according to the QARP grading system. The five-tiered system was graded as follows, Grade 0, no residual tumor cells with regressive changes present; grade 1, 1-25% viable tumor cells per tumor focus with regressive changes present; grade 2, 26-50% viable tumor cells per tumor focus with regressive changes present; grade 3, 51-75% viable tumor cells per tumor focus with few regressive changes; grade 4, >75% viable tumor cells per tumor focus with minimal or no regressive changes. Based on the new grading system, the study cohort was divided into QARP responders and QARP non-responders following PIPAC treatment. Higher QARP scores were significantly correlated with higher PCI scores (r=0.32; P=0.007). However, no difference in overall survival was detected between QARP responders and QARP non-responders. Further studies are required to ascertain the reproducibility and prognostic significance of QARP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Abbas
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Muenster, D-48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Jan Philipp Ramspott
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, D-48149 Muenster, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Pascher
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, D-48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Eva Wardelmann
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Muenster, D-48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Judith C. Sporn
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, D-48149 Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hansen PS, Graversen M, Detlefsen S, Mortensen MB. Review on treatment of pleural metastasis and malignant pleural effusion with Pressurized IntraThoracic Aerosol Chemotherapy (PITAC). Pleura Peritoneum 2024; 9:47-53. [PMID: 38948327 PMCID: PMC11211649 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2023-0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common and debilitating condition seen in advanced cancer disease, and life-expectancy is short. Symptoms include pain and severe shortness of breath. Current first-line treatment options include pleural drainage using catheters as well as pleurodesis. However, these treatment modalities are often inefficient and patients need repeated procedures. Pressurized IntraThoracic Aerosol Chemotherapy (PITAC) is a minimally invasive procedure, where antineoplastic agents are nebulized under pressure into the pleural space. Content We present the preliminary safety, feasibility, and response assessment data for PITAC based on a comprehensive literature review. Summary Five retrospective studies reported data on 38 PITACs in 21 patients. Data were heterogeneous and incomplete on several important aspects such as procedure, safety, local effect and long-term outcomes. PITAC seems technically feasible with a low risk of complications and may provide some reduction in MPE in selected cases. Outlook PITAC seems feasible, but prospective phase I and II studies are needed to define safety, indications, and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernille Schjødt Hansen
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC) and Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Martin Graversen
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC) and Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Upper GI Section, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sönke Detlefsen
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC) and Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Michael Bau Mortensen
- Odense PIPAC Center (OPC) and Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Upper GI Section, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tozzi F, Rashidian N, Ceelen W, Callebout E, Hübner M, Sgarbura O, Willaert W. Standardizing eligibility and patient selection for Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy: A Delphi consensus statement. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108346. [PMID: 38669779 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a procedure for minimally invasive drug administration in patients with peritoneal metastasis. Previous studies have emphasized the importance of uniformity in treatment protocols and standardization of this practice. This study aimed to reach a consensus on eligibility, patient selection, and choice of chemotherapy for PIPAC. METHODS A three-round modified Delphi study was conducted. A steering group formulated a list of baseline statements, addressing the objectives. The steering group consisted of seven expert surgical and medical oncologists. Available evidence and published key opinions were critically reviewed. An international expert panel scored those statements on a 4-point Likert scale. The statements were submitted electronically and anonymously. Consensus was reached if the agreement rate was ≥75%. A minimum Cronbach's alpha of >0.8 was set. RESULTS Forty-five (45/58; 77.6%) experts participated and completed all rounds. Experts were digestive surgeons (n = 28), surgical oncologists (n = 7), gynecologists (n = 5), medical oncologists (n = 4), and one clinical researcher. Their assessment of 81 preliminary statements in the first round resulted in 41 consolidated statements. In round two, consensus was reached on 40 statements (40/41; 97.6%) with a consensus of ≥80% for each individual statement. In the third round, 40 statements were unanimously approved as definitive. The choice of first- and second-line chemotherapy remained controversial and could not reach consensus. CONCLUSIONS This International Delphi study provides practical guidance on eligibility and patient selection for PIPAC. Ongoing trial data and long-term results that could contribute to the further standardization of PIPAC are eagerly awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Tozzi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Nikdokht Rashidian
- Department of General, Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Wim Ceelen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Eduard Callebout
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Gastroenterology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), University of Lausanne, Rue de Bugnon 21, Lausanne, VD, Switzerland.
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, 208 Avenue des Apothecaries, Parc Euromédecine, 34298, Montpellier, France; IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM, U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut régional Du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
| | - Wouter Willaert
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ayala-de Miguel C, Jiménez-Castro J, Sánchez-Vegas A, Díaz-López S, Chaves-Conde M. Neoplastic appendiceal mucinous lesions: a narrative review of the literature from an oncologist's perspective. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:1287-1299. [PMID: 38070049 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03356-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
Appendiceal mucinous lesions' classification and nomenclature has been modified several times along the last decades, reflecting their great heterogeneity and making difficult to compare results and draw conclusions. Despite its nearby origin, appendiceal mucinous lesions have a distinctive behaviour compared to colorectal cancer, including their molecular and genetic markers. Due to their low frequency, their management is not well standardised. However, surgery is considered the cornerstone of treatment. Their indolent behaviour has encouraged surgeons to apply more aggressive treatments, such as cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), that may extend overall survival. Chemotherapy is reserved for unresectable and/or disseminated disease and could play a role in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is recently emerging as a possible alternative for treatment in advanced disease although its results in long-term survival are lacking Hereby, we review the available evidence in the management of appendiceal mucinous lesions, including localised and disseminated disease, with a special emphasis on the oncological perspective, focusing on the lights and shadows of the systemic treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Ayala-de Miguel
- Servicio Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Valme, Ctra. de Cádiz Km 548,9, C.P.: 41014, Seville, Spain
| | - Jerónimo Jiménez-Castro
- Servicio Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Valme, Ctra. de Cádiz Km 548,9, C.P.: 41014, Seville, Spain.
| | - Adrián Sánchez-Vegas
- Servicio Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Valme, Ctra. de Cádiz Km 548,9, C.P.: 41014, Seville, Spain
| | - Sebastián Díaz-López
- Servicio Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Valme, Ctra. de Cádiz Km 548,9, C.P.: 41014, Seville, Spain
| | - Manuel Chaves-Conde
- Servicio Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Valme, Ctra. de Cádiz Km 548,9, C.P.: 41014, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vizzielli G, Giudice MT, Nardelli F, Costantini B, Salutari V, Inzani FS, Zannoni GF, Chiantera V, Di Giorgio A, Pacelli F, Fagotti A, Scambia G. Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) Applied to Platinum-Resistant Recurrence of Ovarian Tumor: A Single-Institution Experience (ID: PARROT Trial). Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1207-1216. [PMID: 38099993 PMCID: PMC10761392 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14648-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in platinum-resistant recurrence of ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis, while our secondary endpoint was to establish any changes in quality of life estimated via the EORTC QLQ-30 and QLQ-OV28 questionnaires. METHODS In this monocentric, single-arm, phase II trial, women were prospectively recruited and every 28-42 days underwent courses of PIPAC with doxorubicin 2.1 mg/m2 followed by cisplatin 10.5 mg/m2 via sequential laparoscopy. RESULTS Overall, 98 PIPAC procedures were performed on 43 women from January 2016 to January 2020; three procedures were aborted due to extensive intra-abdominal adhesions. The clinical benefit rate (CBR) was reached in 82% of women. Three cycles of PIPAC were completed in 18 women (45%), and 13 (32.5%) and 9 (22.5%) patients were subjected to one and two cycles, respectively. During two PIPAC procedures, patients experienced an intraoperative intestinal perforation. There were no treatment-related deaths. Nineteen patients showed no response according to the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS) and 8 patients showed minor response according to the PRGS. Median time from ovarian cancer relapse to disease progression was 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.483-17.517), while the median overall survival was 27 months (95% CI 20.337-33.663). The EORTC QLQ-28 and EORTC QLQ-30 scores did not worsen during therapy. CONCLUSIONS PIPAC seems a feasible approach for the treatment of this subset of patients, without any impact on their quality of life. Since this study had a small sample size and a single-center design, future research is mandatory, such as its application in addition to systemic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Vizzielli
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Santa Maria della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
| | - Maria Teresa Giudice
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Nardelli
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Barbara Costantini
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Saint Camillus International, University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy
| | - Vanda Salutari
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Frediano Socrate Inzani
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Gian Franco Zannoni
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Pacelli
- Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico - Di Cristina - Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- Surgical Unit of Peritoneum and Retroperitoneum, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Saint Camillus International, University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Saint Camillus International, University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy
- Anatomic Pathology Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sun BJ, Lee B. Results of the First Phase I PIPAC Trial in the United States: Braving the Storm. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7923-7925. [PMID: 37770724 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14353-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice J Sun
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Byrne Lee
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mortensen MB, Casella F, Düzgün Ö, Glehen O, Hewett P, Hübner M, Jørgensen MS, Königsrainer A, Marin M, Pocard M, Rezniczek G, So J, Fristrup CW. Second annual report from the ISSPP PIPAC database. Pleura Peritoneum 2023; 8:141-146. [PMID: 38144218 PMCID: PMC10739278 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2023-0047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To monitor the results of PIPAC directed therapy based on data from the International Society for the Study of the Pleura and Peritoneum (ISSPP) PIPAC database. Methods Analysis of data from patients entered between June 15th, 2020, and February 28th, 2023. Results Twelve centers reported 2,456 PIPAC procedures in 809 patients (median 2, range 1-18) with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from different primary tumors. Approximately 90 % had systemic chemotherapy prior to PIPAC. Twenty-eight percent were treated in prospective protocols. Overall non-access rate was 3.5 %. Concomitant surgical procedures were performed during PIPAC in 1.6 % of the patients. Median length of stay was 2 days. A total of 95 surgical complications were recorded, but only 22 % of these were graded ≥3b. Seventeen-hundred-and-three adverse events were noted, and 8 % were classified ≥3. The rate of complete or major histological response (peritoneal regression grade score, PRGS≤2) increased between the first and the third PIPAC in the group of patients who were evaluated by PRGS, and a PRGS ≤2 or a reduction of the mean PRGS of at least 1 between first and third PIPAC were observed in 80 %. Disease progression (50 %) or technical issues (19 %) were the most important reasons for stopping PIPAC treatment. Median overall survival from first PIPAC directed treatment varied from 10.7 months (CI 8.7-12.5) in gastric cancer to 27.1 months (16.4-50.5) in mesothelioma. Conclusions The ISSPP PIPAC database provides substantial real-world data supporting the use of PIPAC directed therapy in patients with PM from different primary tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bau Mortensen
- Upper GI and HPB Section, Department of Surgery, Odense Universitetshospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Francesco Casella
- General and Upper GI Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Veneto, Italy
| | - Özgül Düzgün
- Department of Surgical Oncology, İstanbul Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Oncologique, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Peter Hewett
- Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
| | - Martin Hübner
- Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Miguel Marin
- Department of Surgery, Reina Sofia University General Hospital, Murcia, Spain
| | - Marc Pocard
- Surgical Unit, Paris 7 University, Paris, France
| | | | - Jimmy So
- Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ezanno AC, Malgras B, Conan PL, Aime A, Fawaz J, Picchi H, Doat S, Pocard M. Reasons for stopping Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): A retrospective study to improve future patient selection. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287785. [PMID: 38033087 PMCID: PMC10688840 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
To improve the prognosis and maintain quality of life in patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM), a novel treatment has been introduced-pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). The majority of teams propose at least 3 PIPAC procedures. However, for many patients PIPAC is stopped after only one or two procedures. The aim of this study was to identify the reasons for stopping PIPAC after only one or two procedures and to establish a profile of poor candidates. This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included all patients who underwent PIPAC in three French expert centers between 2015 and 2021. A total of 268 PIPAC procedures were performed in 89 patients. Of them, 48.3% of patients underwent fewer than three procedures: 28.1% had one, 20.2% two and 51.7% three or more PIPAC procedures. The main reason for stopping PIPAC, regardless of the number of procedures, was disease progression, in 55.8% of cases. Other reasons for stopping PIPAC were non-access to the abdominal cavity (7.9%), conversion to cytoreductive surgery (13.5%), post-PIPAC adverse events (7.9%), patients' wishes (10.1%) and death (2.2%). In univariate analysis, patients who received fewer than three PIPACs less frequently had chemotherapy beforehand (91% vs 100%, p = 0.05), less frequently had bimodal treatment (70% vs 87%, p = 0.04), had more ascites (median 80 ml vs 50 ml, p = 0.05) and more frequently had carcinomatosic ascites (48.8% vs 23.9%, p < 0.01). Performing PIPAC alone in chemotherapy-naïve patients with ascites should be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Cécile Ezanno
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France
| | - Brice Malgras
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France
- French Military Health Service Academy, Ecole du Val de Grâce, Paris, France
| | - Pierre-Louis Conan
- Department of Infectiology, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France
| | - Adeline Aime
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France
| | - Jade Fawaz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France
| | - Hugo Picchi
- Department of Oncology, Begin Military Teaching Hospital, Saint Mandé, France
| | - Solène Doat
- Department of Hepato Gastro Enterology, La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Marc Pocard
- Department of Digestive Surgery, La Pitié Salpetrière Hospital, Paris, France
- INSERM, U965 CART Unit, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Raoof M, Whelan RL, Sullivan KM, Ruel C, Frankel PH, Cole SE, Tinsley R, Eng M, Fakih M, Chao J, Lim D, Woo Y, Paz IB, Lew M, Cristea M, Rodriguez-Rodriguez L, Fong Y, Thomas RM, Chang S, Deperalta D, Merchea A, Dellinger TH. Safety and Efficacy of Oxaliplatin Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosolized Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in Colorectal and Appendiceal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: Results of a Multicenter Phase I Trial in the USA. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7814-7824. [PMID: 37501051 PMCID: PMC10562297 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13941-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a laparoscopic locoregional treatment for peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) or appendiceal cancer (AC) in patients who cannot undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS). While PIPAC has been studied in Europe and Asia, it has not been investigated in the USA. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated PIPAC with 90 mg/m2 oxaliplatin alone (cycle 1) and preceded by systemic chemotherapy with fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (cycle 2-3) as a multicenter prospective phase I clinical trial (NCT04329494). The primary endpoint was treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included survival and laparoscopic, histologic, and radiographic response. RESULTS 12 patients were included: 8 with CRC and 4 with AC. Median prior chemotherapy cycles was 2 (interquartile range (IQR) 2-3). All patients were refractory to systemic oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) was 28 (IQR 19-32). Six (50%) of twelve patients completed three PIPAC cycles. No surgical complications or dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Two patients developed grade 3 treatment-related toxicities (one abdominal pain and one anemia). Median overall survival (OS) was 12.0 months, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.9 months. OS was correlated with stable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria but not with laparoscopic response by PCI or histologic response by peritoneal regression grading system (PRGS). CONCLUSIONS This phase I trial in the USA demonstrated safety, feasibility, and early efficacy signal of PIPAC with oxaliplatin and chemotherapy in patients with PM from AC or CRC who are refractory to standard lines of systemic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Raoof
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
| | | | - Kevin M Sullivan
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Christopher Ruel
- Department of Computation and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Paul H Frankel
- Department of Computation and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Sarah E Cole
- Department of Clinical Protocol Development, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Raechelle Tinsley
- Clinical Trials Office, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Melissa Eng
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Marwan Fakih
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Joseph Chao
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Dean Lim
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yanghee Woo
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Isaac Benjamin Paz
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Michael Lew
- Department of Anesthesiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Michaela Cristea
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Yuman Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Sue Chang
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Amit Merchea
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| | - Thanh H Dellinger
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Graversen M, Detlefsen S, Ainsworth AP, Fristrup CW, Knudsen AO, Pfeiffer P, Tarpgaard LS, Mortensen MB. Treatment of Peritoneal Metastasis with Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy: Results from the Prospective PIPAC-OPC2 Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:2634-2644. [PMID: 36602663 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-13010-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a local treatment for peritoneal metastasis (PM). Prospective data are scarce and evaluation of treatment response remains difficult. This study evaluated the use of the Peritoneal Regression Grading score (PRGS) and its prognostic value. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a prospective, controlled phase II trial in patients with PM from gastrointestinal, gynaecological, hepatopancreatobiliary, primary peritoneal, or unknown primary cancer. Patients in performance status 0-1, with a non-obstructed gastrointestinal tract, and a maximum of one extraperitoneal metastasis were eligible. Colorectal or appendiceal PM had PIPAC with oxaliplatin, other primaries had PIPAC with cisplatin and doxorubicin. Biopsies were taken at each PIPAC and evaluated using the PRGS. Quality-of-life questionnaires were reported at baseline and after three PIPACs. RESULTS One hundred ten patients were treated with 336 PIPACs (median 3, range 1-12). One hundred patients had prior palliative chemotherapy and 45 patients received bidirectional treatment. Complete or major histological response to treatment (PRGS 1-2) was observed in 38 patients (61%) who had three PIPACs, which was the only independent prognostic factor in a multivariate analysis. The median overall survival (mOS) from PIPAC 1 was 10 months, while patients with PM from gastric, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer had a mOS of 7.4, 16.7, and 8.2 months, respectively. Global health scores were significantly reduced, but patients were less fatigued, nauseated, constipated, and had better appetite after three PIPACs. CONCLUSIONS PIPAC with oxaliplatin or cisplatin and doxorubicin was able to induce a major or complete histological response during three PIPACs, which may provide significant prognostic information, both at baseline and after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Graversen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. .,Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. .,OPEN-Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Region of Southern Denmark, Denmark. .,OPAC-Odense Pancreas Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - S Detlefsen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,OPAC-Odense Pancreas Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - A P Ainsworth
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,OPAC-Odense Pancreas Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - C W Fristrup
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,OPAC-Odense Pancreas Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - A O Knudsen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - P Pfeiffer
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,OPAC-Odense Pancreas Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - L S Tarpgaard
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - M B Mortensen
- Odense PIPAC Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,OPAC-Odense Pancreas Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Somashekhar SP, Abba J, Sgarbura O, Alyami M, Teixeira Farinha H, Rao RG, Willaert W, Hübner M. Assessment of Treatment Response after Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for Appendiceal Peritoneal Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:4998. [PMID: 36291781 PMCID: PMC9599491 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14204998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to analyse survival and surrogates for oncological response after PIPAC for appendiceal tumours. Methods This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with appendiceal peritoneal metastases (PM) treated in experienced PIPAC centers. Primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS) from the date of diagnosis of PM and from the start of PIPAC. Predefined secondary outcome included radiological response (RECIST criteria), repeat laparoscopy and peritoneal cancer index (PCI), histological response assessed by the Peritoneal regression grading system (PRGS) and clinical response. Results Final analysis included 77 consecutive patients (208 PIPAC procedures) from 15 centres. Median OS was 30 months (23.00-46.00) from time of diagnosis and 19 months (13.00-28.00) from start of PIPAC. 35/77 patients (45%) had ≥3 procedures (pp: per protocol). Objective response at PIPAC3 was as follows: RECIST: complete response 4 (11.4%), 11 (31.4%) partial/stable; mean PRGS at PIPAC3: 1.8 ± 0.9. Median PCI: 21 (IQR 18-27) vs. 22 (IQR 17-28) at baseline (p = 0.59); 21 (60%) and 18 (51%) patients were symptomatic at baseline and PIPAC3, respectively (p = 0.873). Median OS in the pp cohort was 22.00 months (19.00-NA) from 1st PIPAC. Conclusion Patients with PM of appendiceal origin had objective treatment response after PIPAC and encouraging survival curves call for further prospective evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SP Somashekhar
- Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Manipal Hospital, HAL Old Airport Rd, Kodihalli, Bengaluru 560017, India
| | - Julio Abba
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, CEDEX 09, F-38043 Grenoble, France
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Surgical Oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, F-34298 Montpellier, France
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, F-34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Mohammad Alyami
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital, Najran 66262, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hugo Teixeira Farinha
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ramya G. Rao
- Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Manipal Hospital, HAL Old Airport Rd, Kodihalli, Bengaluru 560017, India
| | - Wouter Willaert
- Department of GI Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mehta S, Kammar P, Patel A, Goswami G, Shaikh S, Sukumar V, Trivedi E, Bhatt A. Feasibility and Safety of Taxane-PIPAC in Patients with Peritoneal Malignancies-a Retrospective Bi-institutional Study. Indian J Surg Oncol 2022; 14:1-9. [PMID: 36091624 PMCID: PMC9451111 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-022-01641-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Taxanes have a favorable pharmacokinetic profile for intraperitoneal application. We report our initial experience with taxane-PIPAC (pressurized intraperitoneal chemotherapy) for unresectable peritoneal metastases from different primary sites in terms of safety, feasibility, response rate, and conversion to resectability. In this retrospective study, PIPAC was performed alone or in combination with systemic chemotherapy. Paclitaxel was used as a single agent, whereas docetaxel was used in combination with cisplatin-adriamycin or oxaliplatin-adriamycin. From December 2019 to December 2021, 47 patients underwent 82 PIPAC procedures (1 PIPAC in 55.3%, 2 in 29.7%, 3 in 14.8%). The most common primary sites were ovarian cancer (31.9%), gastric cancer (23.4%), and colorectal cancer (21.2%). Docetaxel-cisplatin-adriamycin was used in 33 (70.2%) patients, docetaxel-oxaliplatin-adriamycin in 12 (25.5%), and paclitaxel alone in 2 (4.2%) patients. Grade 1-2 complications were observed in 24 (51%) and grade 3-4 complications in 6 (12.7%) patients (8.5% of 82 PIPACs). 16/47 (34.0%) patients had a clinical response to PIPAC. The mean PCI was 25.9 ± 9.2 for the first PIPACs and 22.4 ± 9 for the subsequent PIPACs with an average reduction of 3.6 points [change in PCI ranged from - 14 to + 8]. The PRGS was 1/2 in 4/47 (8.5%) patients (19.0% patients with > 1 PIPAC). A reduction in ascites was observed in 35.4% presenting with ascites. Nine (19.1%) patients had conversion to operability leading to a subsequent cytoreductive surgery in 8 (17%) patients. PIPAC with docetaxel is feasible and safe. The role of PIPAC with both docetaxel and paclitaxel either alone or in combination with other drugs should be investigated in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanket Mehta
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Praveen Kammar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Ankita Patel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Thaltej, Ahmedabad, 380054 India
| | - Gaurav Goswami
- Department of Radiology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Sakina Shaikh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Thaltej, Ahmedabad, 380054 India
| | - Vivek Sukumar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Esha Trivedi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Thaltej, Ahmedabad, 380054 India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kepenekian V, Bhatt A, Péron J, Alyami M, Benzerdjeb N, Bakrin N, Falandry C, Passot G, Rousset P, Glehen O. Advances in the management of peritoneal malignancies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:698-718. [PMID: 36071285 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00675-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) are usually associated with a poor prognosis. Nonetheless, in line with advances in the management of most abdominopelvic metastatic diseases, considerable progress has been made over the past decade. An improved understanding of disease biology has led to the more accurate prediction of neoplasia aggressiveness and the treatment response and has been reflected in the proposal of new classification systems. Achieving complete cytoreductive surgery remains the cornerstone of curative-intent treatment of PSMs. Alongside centralization in expert centres, enabling the delivery of multimodal and multidisciplinary strategies, preoperative management is a crucial step in order to select patients who are most likely to benefit from surgery. Depending on the specific PSM, the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy and of perioperative systemic chemotherapy, in particular, in the neoadjuvant setting, is established in certain scenarios but questioned in several others, although more prospective data are required. In this Review, we describe advances in all aspects of the management of PSMs including disease biology, assessment and improvement of disease resectability, perioperative management, systemic therapy and pre-emptive management, and we speculate on future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vahan Kepenekian
- Surgical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.,CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France
| | - Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Julien Péron
- Medical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.,Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Equipe Biostatistique-Santé, UCBL1, Lyon, France
| | - Mohammad Alyami
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nazim Benzerdjeb
- CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France.,Department of Pathology, Institut de Pathologie Multisite, Hospices Civils de Lyon, UCBL1, Lyon, France
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Surgical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.,CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France
| | - Claire Falandry
- Department of Onco-Geriatry, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Guillaume Passot
- Surgical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.,CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France
| | - Pascal Rousset
- CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France.,Department of Radiology, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, UCBL1, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Surgical Oncology Department, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France. .,CICLY - EA3738, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I (UCBL1), Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Balmer A, Clerc D, Toussaint L, Sgarbura O, Taïbi A, Hübner M, Teixeira Farinha H. Selection Criteria for Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) Treatment in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2557. [PMID: 35626160 PMCID: PMC9139612 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The standard treatment protocol for PIPAC consists of three procedures. Completion of treatment has been shown to be prognostic of improved survival. The aim of this study was to identify predictors for completion of treatment. Methods: Retrospective multicentric cohort study of patients with peritoneal metastases undergoing PIPAC in three PIPAC expert centers. Per protocol (PP) treatment was defined as patients receiving ≥3 PIPACs and was compared to patients receiving <3. Results: Overall, 183 patients had 517 PIPACs. The main reasons for stopping PIPAC were disease progression in 50% patients, bowel obstruction in 15%, patient’s refusal to pursue in 10%, conversion to cytoreductive surgery in 7%, and medical reasons in 8%. Overall, 95 patients (52%) had PP treatment. The PP median OS was 17 vs. 7 months, p = 0.001. PP patients had r ascites (410 ± 100 mL vs. 960 ± 188 mL, p = 0.001), no prior history of bowel obstruction (12% vs. 24%, p = 0.028), and more bimodal treatment (39% vs. 13%, p < 0.001). After multiple regression, bimodal treatment was found as an independent predictive factor for completing PP (OR = 4.202, 95%CI [1.813, 10.630], p < 0.001), along with prior bowel obstruction (OR = 0.389, 95%CI [0.153, 0.920], p = 0.037). Conclusion: The absence of ascites and prior bowel obstruction can help to select patients suitable for PIPAC. Best results seem to be achieved when PIPAC is combined with systemic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Balmer
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (A.B.); (D.C.); (L.T.); (M.H.)
| | - Daniel Clerc
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (A.B.); (D.C.); (L.T.); (M.H.)
| | - Laura Toussaint
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (A.B.); (D.C.); (L.T.); (M.H.)
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Surgical Oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, F-34298 Montpellier, France;
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, F-34298 Montpellier, France
| | - Abdelkader Taïbi
- Digestive Surgery Department, Dupuytren Limoges University Hospital, CNRS, XLIM, UMR 7252, F-87000 Limoges, France;
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (A.B.); (D.C.); (L.T.); (M.H.)
| | - Hugo Teixeira Farinha
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; (A.B.); (D.C.); (L.T.); (M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sgarbura O, Eveno C, Alyami M, Bakrin N, Guiral DC, Ceelen W, Delgadillo X, Dellinger T, Di Giorgio A, Kefleyesus A, Khomiakov V, Mortensen MB, Murphy J, Pocard M, Reymond M, Robella M, Rovers KP, So J, Somashekhar SP, Tempfer C, Van der Speeten K, Villeneuve L, Yong WP, Hübner M. Consensus statement for treatment protocols in pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Pleura Peritoneum 2022; 7:1-7. [PMID: 35602919 PMCID: PMC9069497 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Safe implementation and thorough evaluation of new treatments require prospective data monitoring and standardization of treatments. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a promising alternative for the treatment of patients with peritoneal disease with an increasing number of suggested drug regimens. The aim was to reach expert consensus on current PIPAC treatment protocols and to define the most important research topics. Methods The expert panel included the most active PIPAC centers, organizers of PIPAC courses and principal investigators of prospective studies on PIPAC. A comprehensive literature review served as base for a two-day hybrid consensus meeting which was accompanied by a modified three-round Delphi process. Consensus bar was set at 70% for combined (strong and weak) positive or negative votes according to GRADE. Research questions were prioritized from 0 to 10 (highest importance). Results Twenty-two out of 26 invited experts completed the entire consensus process. Consensus was reached for 10/10 final questions. The combination of doxorubicin (2.1 mg/m2) and cisplatin (10.5 mg/m2) was endorsed by 20/22 experts (90.9%). 16/22 (72.7%) supported oxaliplatin at 120 with potential reduction to 90 mg/m2 (frail patients), and 77.2% suggested PIPAC-Ox in combination with 5-FU. Mitomycin-C and Nab-paclitaxel were favoured as alternative regimens. The most important research questions concerned PIPAC conditions (n=3), standard (n=4) and alternative regimens (n=5) and efficacy of PIPAC treatment (n=2); 8/14 were given a priority of ≥8/10. Conclusions The current consensus should help to limit heterogeneity of treatment protocols but underlines the utmost importance of further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Sgarbura
- Department of Surgical Oncology , Cancer Institute of Montpellier, University of Montpellier , Montpellier , France
- IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194 , Université de Montpellier, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier , Montpellier , France
| | - Clarisse Eveno
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery , University of Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital , Lille , France
| | - Mohammad Alyami
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology , Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital , Najran , Saudi Arabia
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Department of General Surgery & Surgical Oncology , Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon , Pierre-Bénite , France
- Lyon University 1, EA 3738 CICLY , Lyon , France
| | - Delia Cortes Guiral
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology , Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital , Najran , Saudi Arabia
| | - Wim Ceelen
- Department of GI Surgery , Ghent University Hospital , Ghent , Belgium
| | - Xavier Delgadillo
- Centre Médico Chirurgical Volta , Unité Spécialisée de Chirurgie , La Chaux-de-Fonds , Switzerland
| | - Thanh Dellinger
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology , City of Hope National Medical Center , Duarte , CA , USA
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Peritoneal and Retroperitoneal Surgical Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Amaniel Kefleyesus
- Department of General Surgery & Surgical Oncology , Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon , Pierre-Bénite , France
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| | - Vladimir Khomiakov
- P.A. Hertsen Moscow Research Oncological Institute – Branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology , Moscow , Russia
| | - Michael Bau Mortensen
- Department of Surgery , Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC) & Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark
| | - Jamie Murphy
- Academic Surgical Unit , Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK
| | - Marc Pocard
- Université de Paris, INSERM, U1275 CAP Paris-Tech , Paris , France
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation , Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP , Paris , France
| | - Marc Reymond
- Department of Surgery , University of Tübingen , Tübingen , Germany
| | - Manuela Robella
- Unit of Surgical Oncology , Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, IRCCS , Turin , Italy
| | - Koen P. Rovers
- Department of Surgery , Catharina Cancer Institute , Eindhoven , The Netherlands
| | - Jimmy So
- Division of Surgical Oncology , National University Cancer Institute , Singapore , Singapore
| | - S. P. Somashekhar
- Department of Surgical Oncology , Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Manipal Hospital , Bangalore , India
| | - Clemens Tempfer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Therapy Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis , Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum , Herne , Germany
| | | | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Lyon University 1, EA 3738 CICLY , Lyon , France
- Department of Public Health , Clinical Research and Epidemiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon , Lyon , France
| | - Wei Peng Yong
- Cancer Science Institute of Singapore , National University of Singapore , Singapore , Singapore
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery , Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL) , Lausanne , Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|