Hyperthermic Mitomycin C in Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of the HIVEC-1 Trial

Efficacy of conduction hyperthermia in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Intravesical treatment for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) aims to reduce recurrences and stop progression. Hyperthermia-enhanced chemotherapy with devices like COMBAT BRS, Unithermia, and BR-TRG-I is a promising alternative to conventional Bacillus de Calmette Guerin (BCG) therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the efficacy of hyperthermia generated by conduction devices in the treatment of NMIBC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. A search was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility of candidate studies and abstracted data from studies that met the inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was assessment of recurrence. Secondary objectives included evaluation of treatment progression and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty studies meeting inclusion criteria underwent data extraction. In intermediate-risk NMIBC patients, COMBAT versus mitomycin C (MMC) in normothermia revealed no superiority in reducing recurrence or progression. High-risk NMIBC patients using COMBAT achieved similar or superior outcomes to BCG. BR-TRG-I demonstrated superior results over normothermia in intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC patients. Unithermia proved less effective than BCG in high-risk NMIBC. Progression outcomes were promising with COMBAT and BR-TRG-I, but comprehensive analysis was limited due to inconsistent assessment across studies. Adverse events were primarily mild-moderate, with some device-specific differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies on conduction hyperthermia present great variability, which do not allow us to determine the superiority of 1 device over another in terms of recurrence, progression, and/or adverse effects. Further research with consistent administration protocols is crucial for definitive conclusions.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ)-A Summary of the 2024 Guidelines Update

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This publication represents a summary of the updated 2024 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), TaT1, and carcinoma in situ. The information presented herein is limited to urothelial carcinoma, unless specified otherwise. The aim is to provide practical recommendations on the clinical management of NMIBC with a focus on clinical presentation.

METHODS

For the 2024 guidelines on NMIBC, new and relevant evidence was identified, collated, and appraised via a structured assessment of the literature. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Recommendations within the guidelines were developed by the panel to prioritise clinically important care decisions. The strength of each recommendation was determined according to a balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, the quality of the evidence (including the certainty of estimates), and the nature and variability of patient values and preferences.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Key recommendations emphasise the importance of thorough diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for patients with NMIBC. The guidelines stress the importance of defining patients' risk stratification and treating them appropriately.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This overview of the 2024 EAU guidelines offers valuable insights into risk factors, diagnosis, classification, prognostic factors, treatment, and follow-up of NMIBC. These guidelines are designed for effective integration into clinical practice.

Mitomycin C vs. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin for treatment of intermediate-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer patients-A comparative analysis from a single center

BACKGROUND

Induction followed by 1 year maintenance instillation of intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the standard treatment for intermediate-risk (IR) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients. Few data exist on the efficacy of Mitomycin C (MMC) instillation in this setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 226 IR-NMIBC patients classified by the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) and 250 IR-NMIBC intravescical treatment-naïve patients classified by the European Association of Urology (EAU). All patients received either a full induction course of BCG or 40 mg/40 ml MMC from 2012 to 2022. Optimal treatment was defined as 1-year maintenance for BCG and 11 monthly maintenance instillations for MMC. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated recurrence-free survival (RFS) before and after inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) and progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate difference in recurrence after adjustment for clinically relevant variables before and after IPTW.

RESULTS

Optimal BCG and MMC courses were administered to 21% of IR-IBCG and 23% of IR-EAU patients. At 4-years, patients treated with optimal MMC and BCG treatment had similar RFS and PFS in both EAU and IBCG groups. Patients receiving nonoptimal BCG compared to optimal MMC exhibited lower 4-year RFS after IPTW (82% vs. 68% in EAU and 82% vs. 65% in IBCG). At 4-year optimal MMC had greater PFS non optimal BCG. Optimal MMC treatment predicted recurrence in EAU (adjusted and weighted HR 0.33, 95% CI, 0.11-0.98) and IBCG (adjusted and weighted HR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.08-0.97) groups compared to nonoptimal BCG.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal 40 mg/40 ml MMC treatment was as effective as optimal BCG in IR-IBCG and IR-EAU NMIBC patients, reducing both recurrence and progression compared to nonoptimal BCG. MMC could be a valid first line alternative to BCG for both IR-EAU and IR-IBCG intravescical treatment-naïve patients, during BCG shortages.

Intravesical thermochemotherapy in the treatment of high-risk and very high-risk non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: a single-arm study

AIM

Intravesical thermochemotherapy, also known as HIVEC (Hyperthermic Intra-VEsical Chemotherapy), represents an alternative adjuvant topical treatment for non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (NMIBC). High-risk (HR) and very HR tumors carry a substantial risk of recurrence and progression. In this study, we present our own results using HIVEC as an alternative to unavailable Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine in the treatment of such groups of patients.

METHODS

During the period of November 2014-June 2022, a total of 47 patients with HR and very HR NMIBC underwent treatment with HIVEC after transurethral resection. They were given an induction of 6 instillations with/without a maintenance. The aim was to evaluate the time to recurrence, event-free survival (recurrence or progression), as measured by Kaplan-Meier analysis, the effect of maintenance treatment and other factors on survival (log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression analysis), and complications.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for patients who did not experience an event was 32 months. The median time to HR (high grade and/or T1 tumor) recurrence in those who recurred was 15 months. The survival rate without HR recurrence at 12, 24, and 48 months was 84, 70, and 59%, respectively. Progression was detected in 10.6% of patients, which translated to 89% of patients living without progression after 24 months. Maintenance treatment (defined as more than six instillations) and presence of CIS significantly correlated with risk of HR recurrence (Hazard ratio 0.34 and 3.12, respectively). One female patient underwent salvage cystectomy due to contractory bladder, and 19.1% of patients experienced transient lower urinary tract symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Based on our experience, HIVEC represents an adequate and safe alternative treatment for HR and very HR NMIBC in situations where BCG is not available or radical cystectomy is not an option for the patient. However, high-quality data from prospective randomized studies are still lacking, and thus, thermochemotherapy should still be regarded as an experimental treatment modality.

The Role of Mitomycin C in Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intravesical mitomycin C (MMC) instillations are recommended to prevent recurrence of intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (IR-NMIBC); however, the optimal regimen and dose are uncertain. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of adjuvant MMC and compare different MMC regimens in preventing recurrence.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in November 2023 for studies investigating recurrence-free survival (RFS) among patients with IR-NMIBC who received adjuvant MMC. Prospective trials with different MMC regimens or other intravesical drugs as comparators were considered eligible.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Overall, 14 studies were eligible for systematic review and 11 for meta-analysis of RFS. Estimates of 1-yr, 2-yr, and 5-yr RFS rates were 84% (95% confidence interval [CI] 79-89%), 75% (95% CI 68-82%), and 51% (95% CI 40-63%) for patients treated with MMC induction plus maintenance, and 88% (95% CI 83-94%), 78% (95% CI 67-89%), and 66% (95% CI 57-75%) for patients treated with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) maintenance, respectively. Estimates of 2-yr RFS rates for MMC maintenance regimens were 76% (95% CI 69-84%) for 40 mg MMC (2 studies) and 66% (95% CI 60-72%) for 30 mg MMC (4 studies). Among the studies included, BCG maintenance provided comparable 2-yr RFS to 40 mg MMC with maintenance (78% vs 76%). RFS did not differ by MMC maintenance duration (>1 yr vs 1 yr vs <1 yr).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

MMC induction and maintenance regimens seem to provide short-term RFS rates equivalent to those for BCG maintenance in IR-NMIBC. For adjuvant induction and maintenance, 40 mg of MMC appears to be more effective in preventing recurrence than 30 mg. We did not observe an RFS benefit for longer maintenance regimens.

PATIENT SUMMARY

For patients with intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, bladder treatments with a solution of a drug called mitomycin C (MMC) seem to be as effective as BCG (bacillus Calmette-Guérin) in preventing recurrence after tumor removal. Further trials are needed for stronger evidence on the best MMC dose and treatment time.

Novel Delivery Systems and Pharmacotherapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic options for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) have traditionally been limited to intravesical immunotherapy or chemotherapy. A considerable number of new options have been investigated in recent years. Our aim was to review the efficacy and toxicity of novel therapeutic options (results already reported or currently under investigation) for patients with NMIBC.

METHODS

We assessed the efficacy of various novel therapeutic options by examining key endpoints in diverse settings, including recurrence, progression, overall survival, disease-specific survival, and complete response. We identified the principal advantages and limitations for each option. Safety was predominantly evaluated as the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events. Our investigation focused on evidence from scientific articles and congress abstracts published in English within the past 5 yr.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

To date, pembrolizumab, nadofaragene firadenovec, and the combination of BCG with N-803 have received US Food and Drug administration approval for the treatment of BCG-unresponsive carcinoma in situ of the bladder (with or without papillary tumours). Five phase 3 trials are recruiting BCG-naïve patients with high-risk NMIBC. There is increasing interest in an ablative rather than an adjuvant approach for patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Novel drugs and device-assisted drug delivery systems are on the verge of changing the treatment of NMIBC. Novel intravesical options seem to have the same efficacy with fewer adverse events in comparison to systemic therapies.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed new therapy options for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Two agents (pembrolizumab and nadofaragene firadenovec) have been approved to date. Ongoing trials are assessing direct delivery of drugs in solution into the bladder. This route seems to have similar efficacy and fewer side effects than intravenous immunotherapy.

Safety and Efficacy of Immediate Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy Following Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour (I-HIVEC)

The recurrence rate following endoscopic treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains high. Standard treatment includes intravesical instillation of chemotoxic agents such as mitomycin C (MMC) to reduce recurrence. It is postulated that upfront administration of hyperthermic intravesical MMC (HIVEC) immediately after transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) may enhance its efficacy, but evidence from human trials is scant. This pilot study explored the safety of immediate intravesical MMC instillation following TURBT using a conductive HIVEC system (Combat BRS). Patients diagnosed with papillary bladder tumours scheduled for TURBT were recruited. Among 29 patients treated with HIVEC, there was minimal additional postoperative morbidity. The majority (79.3%) were discharged after a hospital stay of 1 d, and no patient required bladder irrigation. There were six grade I-II adverse events (20.7%) and one grade III event (3.4%). No recurrences were observed within 3 mo, and the 12-mo recurrence rate was 4.5%. The study findings demonstrate that immediate HIVEC MMC instillation following TURBT is safe. Further research is needed to assess long-term efficacy in comparison to standard cold MMC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is treated with tumour removal via a telescope inserted into the bladder through the urethra (called TURBT). We tested the safety of treating the bladder with a warm solution of a chemotherapy drug (mitomycin C) immediately after TURBT, as this may prevent tumour recurrence. The treatment was safe and well tolerated. Further trials are needed with more patients and longer follow-up to confirm the results.

The Efficacy and Safety of Hyperthermia Intravesical Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The current treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer is suboptimal. However, in recent years, hyperthermia intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) has emerged as a more effective alternative to conventional bladder perfusion. This novel treatment approach appears to have a similar therapeutic effect as Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) perfusion. This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of HIVEC compared to conventional bladder perfusion chemotherapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Additionally, it aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of HIVEC in comparison to BCG perfusion therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to gather relevant studies on HIVEC for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The analysis of the collected data was carried out using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 8 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis, involving 1,203 patients. Among them, 629 cases received HIVEC, 419 cases received conventional bladder perfusion chemotherapy with mitomycin C, and 155 cases received BCG. The combined analysis revealed that the recurrence rate of bladder hyperthermic perfusion was significantly lower than that of conventional perfusion chemotherapy (RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.82, p = 0.0003). However, there was no significant difference in recurrence rate between HIVEC and BCG perfusion (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.56, 1.09, p = 0.14). Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the progression rate between the HIVEC group and either the conventional bladder chemotherapy group (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.52, 2.26, p = 0.83) and the BCG perfusion group (RR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.19, 1.25, p = 0.13). However, compared with the conventional bladder perfusion chemotherapy group, there was no significant statistical difference in adverse events between the bladder hyperthermia chemotherapy group and the conventional bladder perfusion chemotherapy group (RR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.45, p = 0.63). No significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed between HIVEC and BCG perfusion (RR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.83, 1.29, p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

The existing results indicate that HIVEC, when compared to conventional bladder perfusion chemotherapy, can lower the recurrence rate of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, it does not significantly affect the progression rate. There was no statistically significant difference observed in the incidence of adverse events between the use of HIVEC and conventional chemotherapy. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate, progression rate, and incidence of adverse events when compared to BCG.

Comparison of hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a matched-pair analysis

PURPOSE

To compare adjuvant hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) with mitomycin C and standard Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy in terms of oncological outcomes and adverse events in patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of patients with high-risk papillary NMIBC treated with adjuvant intravesical BCG instillations or HIVEC in our institution between June 2017 and August 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Twenty-four patients who received HIVEC were matched 1:1 with patients receiving BCG therapy based on tumor characteristics (tumor stage and grade), age, gender, smoking status, and the number of tumors (single or multiple). HIVEC and standard BCG treatments were compared in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (24 in the BCG group and 24 in the HIVEC group) were included in the study. The median follow-up times of the BCG and HIVEC groups were 32 [interquartile range (IQR): 28.0-47.8] and 28 (IQR: 16.7-41.8) months, respectively (p = 0.11). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the 24-month RFS (BCG 83% vs HIVEC 88%, p = 0.64) and the 24-month PFS (BCG 100% vs HIVEC 94%, p = 0.61). Regarding the safety profile, at least one adverse event occurred in 13 (54%) of the patients in the BCG group and 12 (50.0%) of those in the HIVEC group (p = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that HIVEC with mitomycin C has a similar oncological efficacy and safety profile to standard BCG therapy in high-risk NMIBC.

Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel is an Alternative to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for the Treatment of Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

Adjuvant treatment with either chemotherapy or bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is recommended for patients with intermediate-risk (IR) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). In this multi-institutional retrospective review, we evaluated oncological outcomes for 182 patients with IR-NMIBC treated with BCG (n = 100) or intravesical sequential gemcitabine and docetaxel (Gem/Doce; n = 82). Median follow-up was 48.6 mo (interquartile range 24.9-70.9). No patient had a previous diagnosis of high-grade disease. Recurrence rates were similar in the two treatment groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-1.73; p = 0.8). Results were consistent after adjusting for International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) risk subgroups, use of single-instillation postoperative chemotherapy, use of blue light cystoscopy, and receipt of maintenance therapy (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.47-1.64; p = 0.7). Similarly, there was no difference in the rate of stage/grade progression between the treatment groups (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.21-2.12; p = 0.5). Rates of progression to muscle-invasive disease/metastasis (2.2%) and cancer-specific mortality (1.7%) were low in the cohort. Our results support the use of Gem/Doce as an alternative to BCG in patients with IR-NMIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared cancer control outcomes for two different treatments for intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Our results show that a chemotherapy combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine is as effective as the BCG (bacillus Calmette-Guérin) treatment traditionally used for this type of bladder cancer.

Intermediate and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an overview of epidemiology, burden, and unmet needs

Bladder cancer ranks among the most common cancers globally. At diagnosis, 75% of patients have non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Patients with low-risk NMIBC have a good prognosis, but recurrence and progression rates remain high in intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC, despite the decades-long availability of effective treatments for NMIBC such as intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). The present review provides an overview of NMIBC, including its burden and treatment options, and then reviews aspects that counteract the successful treatment of NMIBC, referred to as unmet treatment needs. The scale and reasons for each unmet need are described based on a comprehensive review of the literature, including insufficient adherence to treatment guidelines by physicians because of insufficient knowledge, training, or access to certain therapy options. Low rates of lifestyle changes and treatment completion by patients, due to BCG shortages or toxicities and adverse events as well as their impact on social activities, represent additional areas of potential improvement. Highly heterogeneous evidence for the effectiveness and safety of some treatments limits the comparability of results across studies. As a result, efforts are underway to standardize treatment schedules for BCG, but intravesical chemotherapy schedules remain unstandardized. In addition, risk-scoring models often perform unsatisfactorily due to significant differences between derivation and real-world cohorts. Reporting in clinical trials suffers from a lack of consistent outcomes reporting in bladder cancer clinical trials, paired with an under-representation of racial and ethnic minorities in many trials.

Hyperthermia intravesical chemotherapy acts as a promising alternative to bacillus Calmette-Guérin instillation in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a network meta-analysis

Introduction

With the shortage of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, it is important to find an alternative to BCG instillation, which is the most commonly used adjuvant treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients after transurethral resection of bladder tumor treatment (TURBt) to delay tumor recurrence. Hyperthermia intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) with mitomycin C (MMC) is a potential treatment choice. We aim to compare HIVEC with BCG instillation for the preventive efficacy of bladder tumor recurrence and progression.

Methods

A network meta-analysis (NMA) was taken with MMC instillation and TURBt as the attached comparators. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with NIMBC patients after TURBt were included. Articles with pure BCG unresponsive patients and combined therapies were excluded. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42023390363).

Results

It was found that HIVEC had a non-significant 22% relative reduction in bladder tumor recurrence compared with BCG instillation [HIVEC vs. BCG: HR 0.78, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.55-1.08] and a nonsignificant higher risk of bladder tumor progression (BCG vs. HIVEC: HR 0.77, 95% CrI 0.22-3.03).

Discussion

HIVEC is a potential alternative to BCG, and it is expected to be the standard therapy for NMIBC patients after TURBt during the global shortage of BCG.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO identifier, CRD42023390363.

Efficacy of Different Bacillus of Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Strains on Recurrence Rates among Intermediate/High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancers (NMIBCs): Single-Arm Study Systematic Review, Cumulative and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

In an era of Bacillus of Calmette-Guérin (BCG) shortages, the comparative efficacy from different adjuvant intravesical BCG strains in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has not been clearly elucidated. We aim to compare, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the cumulative BC recurrence rates and the best efficacy profile of worldwide available BCG strains over the last forty years.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1982 up to 2022. A meta-analysis of pooled BC recurrence rates was stratified for studies with ≤3-y vs. >3-y recurrence-free survival (RFS) endpoints and the strain of BCG. Sensitivity analysis, sub-group analysis, and meta-regression were implemented to investigate the contribution of moderators to heterogeneity. A random-effect network meta-analysis was performed to compare BCG strains on a multi-treatment level.

RESULTS

In total, n = 62 series with n = 15,412 patients in n = 100 study arms and n = 10 different BCG strains were reviewed. BCG Tokyo 172 exhibited the lowest pooled BC recurrence rate among studies with ≤3-y RFS (0.22 (95%CI 0.16-0.28). No clinically relevant difference was noted among strains at >3-y RFS outcomes. Sub-group and meta-regression analyses highlighted the influence of NMIBC risk-group classification and previous intravesical treated categories. Out of the n = 11 studies with n = 7 BCG strains included in the network, BCG RIVM, Tice, and Tokyo 172 presented with the best-predicted probability for efficacy, yet no single strain was significantly superior to another in preventing BC recurrence risk.

CONCLUSION

We did not identify a BCG stain providing a clinically significant lower BC recurrence rate. While these findings might discourage investment in future head-to-head randomized comparison, we were, however, able to highlight some potential enhanced benefits from the genetically different BCG RIVM, Tice, and Tokyo 172. This evidence would support the use of such strains for future BCG trials in NMIBCs.

Is CIS a Contraindication to Hyperthermic Intravesical Chemotherapy (HIVEC) after BCG-Failure?

CIS of the bladder is associated with a high risk of progression. In the case of BCG failure, radical cystectomy should be performed. For patients who refuse or are ineligible, bladder-sparing alternatives are evaluated. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of Hyperthermic IntraVesical Chemotherapy (HIVEC) depending on the presence or absence of CIS. This retrospective, multicenter study was conducted between 2016 and 2021. Patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with BCG failure received 6-8 adjuvant instillations of HIVEC. The co-primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 116 consecutive patients met our inclusion criteria of whom 36 had concomitant CIS. The 2-year RFS rate was 19.9% and 43.7% in patients with and without CIS, respectively (p = 0.52). Fifteen patients (12.9%) experienced progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer with no significant difference between patients with and without CIS (2-year PFS rate = 71.8% vs. 88.8%, p = 0.32). In multivariate analysis, CIS was not a significant prognostic factor in terms of recurrence or progression. In conclusion, CIS may not be considered a contraindication to HIVEC, as there is no significant association between CIS and the risk of progression or recurrence after treatment.

Advances in Urological Cancer in 2022, from Basic Approaches to Clinical Management

This Special Issue includes 12 articles and 3 reviews dealing with several basic and clinical aspects of prostate, renal, and urinary tract cancer published during 2022 in Cancers, and intends to serve as a multidisciplinary chance to share the last advances in urological neoplasms [...].