Low tibial valgization osteotomy for varus ankle arthritis - does age effect the outcome?

Supramalleolar osteotomy for the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis leads to favourable outcomes and low complication rates at mid-term follow-up: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate both the clinical and radiographic outcomes following supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) in patients with ankle osteoarthritis, and to analyse the level of evidence (LOE) and quality of evidence (QOE) of the included studies.

METHODS

A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting clinical data following SMO for the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis were included and assessed. The level and quality of evidence of the included studies were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies with 1160 patients (1182 ankles) were included. Overall, 78.8% patients presented with post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis. The weighted mean AOFAS score improved from 52.6 ± 9.7 (range 33.8-78.4) preoperatively to 78.1 ± 5.7 postoperatively at weighted mean follow-up of 50.4 ± 18.6 months (range 24.5-99.0).  The most frequently utilised radiographic parameter was the tibial anterior surface angle, which improved from a preoperative weighted mean of 86.3° ± 5.6° (range 76.0°-102.0°) to a postoperative weighted mean of 89.9° ± 3.7° (range 84.9°-99.6°). The complication rate was 5.1% with non-union as the most commonly reported complication (1.6%). Secondary procedures were carried out in 28.2% of patients, the most common of which was implant and hardware removal (17.6%). The failure rate was 6.8%. Two studies were LOE II, 3 studies were LOE III, and 19 studies were LOE IV. The mean Modified Coleman Methodology Score was 59.3 ± 6.6 and the mean MINORS criteria score of all the included studies was 9.5 ± 3.7.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review demonstrates good clinical and radiological outcomes, together with a low failure rate at mid-term follow-up following supramalleolar osteotomy in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. However, a moderate reoperation rate (28.2%) was reported. A low failure rate (6.8%) was reported, which must be interpreted in light of the shortcomings of the design of the included studies and a relatively short follow-up period. In addition, there is a low level and quality of evidence in the current literature with inconsistent reporting of data which underscores the need for further higher quality research to be conducted. Our review highlights that SMO may be an effective and safe procedure in the setting of early-to-intermediate-stage ankle osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Is there an optimal degree of correction for ankle varus deformity after supramalleolar osteotomy? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the angle targeted for in varus ankle deformity after supramalleolar osteotomy (SMOT). The aim of this study was to investigate which obtained correction has the best clinical outcome after valgus SMOT.

METHODS

A systematic review according PRISMA guidelines was conducted with studies being eligible for inclusion when published in English, German or Dutch, patients older than 18 years at study entrance, primary or posttraumatic varus ankle osteoarthritis, using any valgus SMOT technique, describing radiological alignment and clinical outcome at baseline and after at least 12 months follow-up. Risk of bias was assessed using the McMaster University Occupational Therapy Evidence-Based Practice Research Group quality assessment tool. The electronical databases PubMed, EMBASE and Cinahl were used as data sources. Included cohorts were categorized according to the mean obtained medial distal tibia angle (MDTA; ranged between 87° and 100°). A linear mixed effect model was used for individual patient data to assess the association between the MDTA and the (difference in) clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Thirty studies including 33 patient cohorts with 922 ankles were identified. At a mean follow-up of 4 years no differences in clinical outcome between correction categories were found. Individual data of 34 ankles showed no relationship between obtained MDTA and clinical outcome either.

CONCLUSION

This review could not demonstrate an optimal degree of correction after valgus SMOT. Results were hampered by biased low quality studies and the widespread use of unreliable 2D alignment measures such as the MDTA.