Long-term reproductive outcomes in patients with unexplained infertility: follow-up of the Fast Track and Standard Treatment Trial participants

Should IUI replace IVF as first-line treatment for unexplained infertility? A literature review

BACKGROUND

Unexplained infertility accounts for 25% of infertility causes in the UK. Active intervention methods, such as intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilisation (IVF), are often sought. Despite the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommending IVF for unexplained infertility, this recommendation has generated an ongoing debate, with few fertility clinics discontinuing the use of IUI as the first-line management of choice. In contrast to NICE, recent guidance released from the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) in August 2023 supports the use of IUI as first-line. High-quality evidence behind such interventions is lacking, with current literature providing conflicting results.

AIMS

This review aims to provide a literature overview exploring whether IUI or IVF should be used as first-line treatment for couples with unexplained infertility, in the context of current guidelines.

METHODS

The primary outcome used to assess efficacy of both treatment methods is live birth (LB) rates. Secondary outcomes used are clinical pregnancy (CP) and ongoing pregnancy (OP) rates. A comprehensive literature search of 4 databases: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Maternity & Infant Care and the Cochrane Library were searched in January 2022. Upon removal of duplications, abstract screening, and full-text screening, a total of 34 papers were selected.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

This review highlights a large discrepancy in the literature when examining pregnancy outcomes of IUI and IVF treatments. Evidence shows IUI increases LB and CP rates 3-fold compared to expectant management. Literature comparing IUI to IVF is less certain. The review finds the literature implies IVF should be used for first-line management but the paucity of high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs), coupled with heterogeneity of the identified studies and a lack of research amongst women > 40 years warrants the need for further large RCTs. The decision to offer IUI with ovarian stimulation (IUI-OS) or IVF should be based upon patient prognostic factors. We suggest that IUI-OS could be offered as first-line treatment for unexplained infertility for women < 38 years, with good prognosis, and IVF could be offered first to those > 38 years. Patients should be appropriately counselled to enable informed decision making.

Assisted reproductive technology outcomes and gene expression in unexplained infertility patients

Background: Unexplained infertility (UI) can be a frustrating and challenging diagnosis for doctors and couples as it can be difficult to understand why they are unable to conceive despite increasing diagnostic tools. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures have been successfully applied to many couples aiming to overcome UI. However, they can be not only expensive but also require multiple cycles to achieve a successful pregnancy. The endometrium and the follicular fluid have been investigated as target tissues not only to determine the cause of UI but also to increase conception rates. Results: In this study, we analyzed the outcomes of ART in 223 UI couples and gene expression associated with DNA modification, cell death, immune response and senescence (TET1, TET2, BCL2, BAK1, HMGA2, IL-6, IL-8) in infertile women's endometrium and follicular fluid. We found significant differences in women who successfully got pregnant compared to women unable to conceive depending on age, duration of infertility, number of retrieved oocytes, zygotes, transferred embryos. Further, the expression of genes BAK1 (pro-apoptotic), TET2 (associated with epigenetic DNA modification) and IL-6 (associated with immune responses) were significantly higher in the endometrium of women who successfully got pregnant. Conclusion: Younger parental age couples showed higher ART success rates, shorter duration of infertility, higher number of retrieved oocytes, zygotes and transferred embryos. The gene expression analysis revealed significant changes in the endometrium depending on genes associated with cell death and immune response which were upregulated in females with diagnosed unexplained infertility.

Association of infertility with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among postmenopausal participants in the Women's Health Initiative

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of infertility with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) among postmenopausal participants in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI). We hypothesized that nulliparity and pregnancy loss may reveal more extreme phenotypes of infertility, enabling further understanding of the association of infertility with ASCVD.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Forty clinical centers in the United States.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 158,787 postmenopausal participants in the Women's Health Initiative cohort.

INTERVENTION(S)

Infertility, parity, and pregnancy loss.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome was risk of ASCVD among women with and without a history of infertility, stratified by history of live birth and pregnancy loss. Cox proportional-hazards models were adjusted for demographics and risk factors for ASCVD.

RESULT(S)

Among 158,787 women, 25,933 (16.3%) reported a history of infertility; 20,427 (80%) had at least 1 live birth; and 9,062 (35%) had at least 1 pregnancy loss. There was a moderate overall association between infertility and ASCVD (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-1.06) over 19 years of follow-up. Among nulliparous women, infertility was associated with a 13% higher risk of ASCVD (95% CI, 1.04-1.23). Among nulliparous women who had a pregnancy loss, infertility was associated with a 36% higher risk of ASCVD (95% CI, 1.09-1.71).

CONCLUSION(S)

Women with a history of infertility overall had a moderately higher risk of ASCVD compared with women without a history of infertility. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk was much higher among nulliparous infertile women and among nulliparous infertile women who also had a pregnancy loss, suggesting that in these more extreme phenotypes, infertility may be associated with ASCVD risk.