Study of cerebrospinal injuries by force transmission secondary to mandibular impacts using a finite element model

Traumatic axonal injury: Clinic, forensic and biomechanics perspectives

Identification of Traumatic axonal injury (TAI) is critical in clinical practice, particularly in terms of long-term prognosis, but also for medico-legal issues, to verify whether the death or the after-effects were attributable to trauma. Multidisciplinary approaches are an undeniable asset when it comes to solving these problems. The aim of this work is therefore to list the different techniques needed to identify axonal lesions and to understand the lesion mechanisms involved in their formation. Imaging can be used to assess the consequences of trauma, to identify indirect signs of TAI, to explain the patient's initial symptoms and even to assess the patient's prognosis. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the skull can highlight fractures suggestive of trauma. Microscopic and immunohistochemical techniques are currently considered as the most reliable tools for the early identification of TAI following trauma. Finite element models use mechanical equations to predict biomechanical parameters, such as tissue stresses and strains in the brain, when subjected to external forces, such as violent impacts to the head. These parameters, which are difficult to measure experimentally, are then used to predict the risk of injury. The integration of imaging data with finite element models allows researchers to create realistic and personalized computational models by incorporating actual geometry and properties obtained from imaging techniques. The personalization of these models makes their forensic approach particularly interesting.

Head injury: Importance of the deep brain nuclei in force transmission to the brain

Finite element modeling provides a digital representation of the human body. It is currently the most pertinent method to study the mechanisms of head injury, and is becoming a scientific reference in forensic expert reports. Improved biofidelity is a recurrent aim of research studies in biomechanics in order to improve earlier models whose mechanical properties conformed to simplified elastic behavior and mechanic laws. We aimed to study force transmission to the brain following impacts to the head, using a finite element head model with increased biofidelity. To the model developed by the Laboratory of Applied Biomechanics of Marseille, we added new brain structures (thalamus, central gray nuclei and ventricular systems) as well as three tracts involved in the symptoms of head injury: the corpus callosum, uncinate tracts and corticospinal tracts. Three head impact scenarios were simulated: an uppercut with the prior model and an uppercut with the improved model in order to compare the two models, and a lateral impact with an impact velocity of 6.5 m/s in the improved model. In these conditions, in uppercuts the maximum stress values did not exceed the injury risk threshold. On the other hand, the deep gray matter (thalamus and central gray nuclei) was the region at highest risk of injury during lateral impacts. Even if injury to the deep gray matter is not immediately life-threatening, it could explain the chronic disabling symptoms of even low-intensity head injury.

Development and validation of a digital twin of the human lower jaw under impact loading by using non-linear finite element analyses

Mandibular fractures are one of the most frequently observed injuries within craniofacial region mostly due to tumor-related problems and traumatic events, often related to non-linear effects like impact loading. Therefore, a validated digital twin of the mandible is required to develop the best possible patient-specific treatment. However, there is a need to obtain a fully compatible numerical model that can reflect the patients' characteristics, be available and accessible quickly, require an acceptable level of modeling efforts and knowledge to provide accurate, robust and fast results at the same time under highly non-linear effects. In this study, a validated simulation methodology is suggested to develop a digital twin of mandible, capable of predicting the non-linear response of the biomechanical system under impact loading, which then can be utilized to design treatment strategies even for multiple fractures of the mandibular system. Using Computed Tomography data containing cranial (skull) images of a patient, a 3-dimensional mandibular model, which consists cortical and cancellous bones, disks and fossa is obtained with high accuracy that is compatible with anatomical boundaries. A Finite Element Model (FEM) of the biomechanical system is then developed for a three-level validation procedure including (A) modal analysis, (B) dynamic loading and (C) impact loading. For the modal analysis stage: Free-free vibration modes and frequencies of the system are validated against cadaver test results. For the dynamic loading stage: Two different regions of the mandible are loaded, and maximum stress levels of the system are validated against finite element analyses (FEA) results, where the first loading condition (i) transfers a 2000 N force acting on the symphysis region and, the second loading condition (ii) transfers a 2000 N force acting on the left body region. In both cases, equivalent muscle forces dependent on time are applied. For the impact loading stage: Thirteen different human mandibular models with various tooth deficiencies are used under the effects of traumatic impact forces that are generated by using an impact hammer with different initial velocities to transfer the impulse and momentum, where contact forces and fracture patterns are validated against cadaver tests. Five different anatomical regions are selected as the impact site. The results of the analyzes (modal, dynamic and impact) performed to validate the digital twin model are compared with the similar FEA and cadaver test results published in the literature and the results are found to be compatible. It has been evaluated that the digital twin model and numerical models are quite realistic and perform well in terms of predicting the biomechanical behavior of the mandible. The three-level validation methodology that is suggested in this research by utilizing non-linear FEA has provided a reliable road map to develop a digital twin of a biomechanical system with enough confidence that it can be utilized for similar structures to offer patient-specific treatments and can help develop custom or tailor-made implants or prosthesis for best compliance with the patient even considering the most catastrophic effects of impact related trauma.

Sudden death after facial impacts: Is the brainstem involved?

Three deaths following facial impacts in the presence of witnesses and resulting in brain lesions that were visualized only on pathological examination were studied at the forensic medicine institute of Marseille. Craniofacial impacts, even of low intensity, received during brawls may be associated with brain lesions ranging from a simple knock-out to fatal injuries. In criminal cases that are brought to court, even by autopsy it is still difficult to establish a direct link between the violence of the impact and the injuries that resulted in death. During a facial impact, the head undergoes a movement of violent forced hyperextension. Death may thus be secondary to the transmission of forces to the brain, either by a mechanism involving nerve conduction that may be termed a reflex mechanism (for example by vagal hyperstimulation) or by injury to the central nervous system (axonal damage). In such situations, autopsy does not make it possible to determine the cause of death, but only to suspect it in a context of voluntary violence in the presence of witnesses, with or without violent injury observed on external examination or on superficial incisions to determine the extent of bruises or hematoma. Systemic and comprehensive investigation involving pathology and toxicology is essential in any medicolegal case for positive interpretation and discrimination of other causes of death.

Fracture heat map of the facial skull demonstrates a danger zone of concomitant cervical spine injuries

Concomitant maxillofacial and cervical spine injuries occur in 0.8-12% of the cases. We examined the relation of injury localization and the probability of cervical spine fracture. A retrospective study was conducted on patients that have been treated at Dortmund General Hospital for injuries both to the maxillofacial region and to the cervical spine between January 1st, 2007 and December 31th, 2017. Descriptive statistical methods were used to describe the correlation of cervical spine injuries with gender, age as well as maxillofacial injury localization. 7708 patients were hospitalized with maxillofacial injury, among them 173 were identified with cervical spine injury. The average ages for both genders lie remarkably above the average of all maxillofacial trauma patients (36.2 y.o. in male and 50.9 y.o. in female). In the group of men, most injuries were found between the ages of 50 and 65. Whereas most injuries among women occurred after the age of 80. The relative ratio of cervical spine injuries (CSI) varies between 1.1 and 5.26% of the maxillofacial injuries (MFI), being highest in the soft tissue injury group, patients with forehead fractures (3.12%) and patients with panfacial fractures (2.52%). Further, nasal, Le Fort I and II, zygomatic complex and mandibular condyle fractures are often associated with CSI. Fractures next to the Frankfurt horizontal plane represent 87.7% of all MFI with concomitant CSI. Patients in critical age groups with a high-energy injury are more likely to suffer both, MFI and CSI injuries. Our findings help to avoid missing the diagnosis of cervical spine injury in maxillofacial trauma patients.