Usefulness and safety of 0.4% sodium hyaluronate solution as a submucosal fluid "cushion" in endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms: a prospective multicenter trial

Efficacy and safety of MC-003 solution for endoscopic mucosal or submucosal resection: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, triple-blinded, parallel-group, phase III study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The safety and efficacy of solutions for submucosal injection are critical for endoscopic resection of gastric adenomas or early gastric cancers. Although several injectable solutions have been introduced for endoscopic resection, they have some limitations. We aimed to compare the efficacy of the new sodium alginate-based solution MC-003 with that of normal saline (NS; 0.9% sodium chloride).

METHODS

In this randomized, triple-blind study, 70 patients were initially enrolled for EMR or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The main outcomes included the need for additional injections, completion of en bloc resection, and occurrence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Each group ultimately included 34 patients. Complete en bloc resections were achieved in all patients (P = 1.000). The MC-003 group had more peri-neoplasm tissue fibrosis (P = .056) and needed fewer additional injections for lesions >15 mm (P = .037), located in the distal portion of the stomach (P = .007), and during ESD procedures (P = .001). The adverse event rate was comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MC-003 outperformed NS in reducing the need for additional injections during en bloc resection, particularly in larger lesions located in the distal portion of the stomach (where most lesions were found) during ESD procedures, without increasing the incidence of serious adverse events. MC-003 is a promising submucosal injectable solution in real-world clinical settings.

Hypertonic solution as an optimal submucosal injection solution for endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal mucosal lesions: Systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Based on different physicochemical properties, common submucosal injection solutions could be classified into three categories: normal saline solution (NS), hypertonic solution (HS), and viscous solution (VS). We compared the efficacy and safety of various categories of solutions in this network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to identify the optimal submucosal injection fluid.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs that compared the efficacy and safety of NS, HS, and VS during endoscopic resection for gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal lesions. Pairwise and network analyses were conducted to determine the ranking of different fluids.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs were included in the final analysis with 1637 patients (1639 lesions). HS outperformed NS in rates of en bloc (pooled relative risk [RR] 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.90), overall bleeding (pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.33; 95% CI 0.10-0.88; lesions >10 mm OR 4.65 × 10-2; 95% CI 1.10 × 10-3-0.46), and intraoperative bleeding (lesions >10 mm OR 7.10 × 10-6; 95% CI 4.30 × 10-18-0.26). HS showed the highest probability of ranking first in each outcome except for the volume of injection. Although VS was superior to NS in rates of en bloc, overall, and intraoperative bleeding in the lesions >10 mm subgroup, and required less fluid in pooled analysis, it ranked last in cost of submucosal injection solution.

CONCLUSIONS

Both HS and VS were superior to NS in comparisons of efficacy and safety. Considering the better performance and potentially low cost, HS might be an optimal choice during gastrointestinal endoscopic resection, especially for colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection.

Innovative submucosal injection solution for endoscopic resection with phosphorylated pullulan: a preclinical study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A submucosal injection solution is used to assist in endoscopic surgery. The high viscosity of current solutions makes them difficult to inject. In the present study, we developed an extremely low-viscosity, easy-to-use submucosal injection solution using phosphorylated pullulan (PPL).

METHODS

The PPL solutions were prepared at different concentrations, and their viscosities were measured. The mucosal elevation capacity was evaluated using excised porcine stomachs. Controls included 0.4% sodium hyaluronate (SH), 0.6% sodium alginate (SA), and saline. To evaluate the practicality, the catheter injectability of 0.7% PPL was measured, and EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were performed using the stomach and colorectum of live pigs. As controls, 0.4% SH and saline were used.

RESULTS

The PPL solutions were of extremely low viscosity compared to the solutions of 0.4% SH and 0.6% SA. Nevertheless, the mucosal elevation capacity of PPL solutions for up to 0.7% concentration was similar to that of 0.4% SH, and 0.7% PPL was less resistant to catheter infusion than 0.4% SH and 0.6% SA. In live pig experiments with endoscopic mucosal resection and ESD, snaring after submucosal injection of 0.7% PPL was easier than with 0.4% SH, ESD with 0.7% PPL produced less bubble formation than with 0.4% SH, and the procedure time tended to be shorter with 0.7% PPL than with 0.4% SH because of the shorter injection time.

CONCLUSIONS

The PPL solution is an innovative and easy-to-use submucosal injection solution.

Feasibility and safety of 0.6% sodium alginate in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplastic lesion: A pilot study

Objectives

The usefulness of 0.6% sodium alginate (SA) as a submucosal (SM) injection solution for endoscopic SM dissection (ESD) has gained attention over the past few years. However, using ESD for colorectal neoplastic lesions is not explicitly researched as yet. Thus, we conducted this study to determine the feasibility and safety of 0.6% SA solution for colorectal ESD.

Methods

In this single-center, retrospective pilot study, a total of 100 cases treated with ESD using 0.6% SA as a SM injection solution for colorectal neoplasia at our institute were retrospectively reviewed to clarify the clinical feasibility and safety of 0.6% SA. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the complication rate, and the secondary endpoint was to determine the procedure time and the amount of solution used.

Results

Intraoperative perforation was observed in 1 case (1.0%), 2 cases (2.0%) presented with postprocedural hemorrhage, and no lethal adverse events were observed. The median ESD procedure times were 39.5 min (10-150), and the amount of solution used was less than 20 mL in 67 cases (67.0%). En-bloc resection could be achieved in 97 cases (97.0%). Although six cases underwent subsequent surgery due to the deep SM invasion (>1000 μm), there were no cases with nodal involvement, confirmed through histopathological evaluation.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that 0.6% SA can potentially ensure safe and secure ESD for colorectal neoplasia.

Efficacy and safety of a submucosal injection solution of sodium alginate for endoscopic resection in a porcine model

Endoscopic resection techniques require the use of submucosal injection. Normal saline and sodium hyaluronate solutions are mainly used for this purpose, but an ideal solution has not yet been developed. The aim of this study was to assess a new solution, MC-003-a novel submucosal injection solution developed with sodium alginate as the main ingredient. Normal saline, a commercial sodium hyaluronate solution (Endo-Ease), and MC-003 were examined. A total of 18 gastric submucosal cushions were created in the stomachs of six pigs. The height of mucosal elevation was measured sequentially using endoscopic sonography. After euthanizing the animals either 2 h or 5 days after the procedure, pathologic examination was performed for each injection site. Although not statistically significant over the entire study period, MC-003 showed a superior result to normal saline and an equivalent result to Endo-Ease in the submucosal cushion height and its rate of decrease. There were no adverse outcomes after injection of the three solutions and there was no pathologically identified detrimental change in the resected specimens. MC-003 creates a sufficient submucosal fluid cushion without apparent tissue damage. It can be considered as an effective submucosal injection material.

Hybrid and Conventional Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Neoplasms: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (H-ESD), which incorporates endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with endoscopic mucosal resection, has been developed to make ESD technically easier. This study aimed to determine if H-ESD is superior to conventional ESD (C-ESD) for small early gastric neoplasms (EGNs).

METHODS

We conducted a multi-center, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial to compare the treatment outcomes of H-ESD and C-ESD (Hybrid-G Trial). Patients with differentiated type intramucosal EGN ≤20 mm in diameter and without ulceration were randomly assigned (1:1) to groups that underwent H-ESD or C-ESD. A single multi-functional snare, SOUTEN (ST1850-20, Kaneka, Medix, Tokyo, Japan), was used for H-ESD. The primary outcome was procedure time. Secondary outcomes included mucosal incision time, time and speed of submucosal dissection, curability, and endoscopic procedural adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 39 and 40 patients underwent H-ESD and C-ESD, respectively. The procedure time of H-ESD was significantly shorter than that of C-ESD (33.16 min vs 62.46 min; H-ESD/C-ESD ratio: 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.69; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in mucosal incision time between the 2 groups; the time and speed of submucosal dissection of H-ESD were significantly shorter than those of C-ESD. No difference was observed between the 2 groups in other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

H-ESD has significantly shorter procedure time than C-ESD, with high and comparable curability and safety for both H-ESD and C-ESD. H-ESD can be a good option for the endoscopic treatment of small EGNs. (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, Numbers: UMIN000041244).

Design and biopharmaceutical preclinical characterisation of a new thermosensitive hydrogel for the removal of gastric polyps

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Submucosal injection agents are widely used solutions in gastric polyp resection techniques. Currently, many different solutions are used in clinical practice, but most are not authorised for this use or are not biopharmaceutical characterised. The objective of this multidisciplinary work is to test the efficacy of a novel thermosensitive hydrogel designed specifically for this indication.

METHODS

A mixture design of various components (Pluronic®, hyaluronic acid and sodium alginate) was carried out to select the combination with optimal properties for this use. Three final thermosensitive hydrogels were selected on which biopharmaceutical characterisation was performed and stability and biocompatibility were analysed. Efficacy in maintaining elevation was tested ex vivo on pig mucosa and in vivo in pigs RESULTS: The mixture design allowed selection of the ideal combinations of agents for the characteristics sought. The thermosensitive hydrogels studied showed high values of hardness and viscosity at 37 °C, maintaining good syringeability. One of them demonstrated superiority in maintaining polyp elevation in the ex vivo assay and non-inferiority in the in vivo assay.

CONCLUSION

The thermosensitive hydrogel specifically designed for this use is promising both for its biopharmaceutical characteristics and for its demonstrated efficacy. This study lays the foundation for evaluating the hydrogel in humans.

Comparisons of outcomes between ProKnife injection endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for large gastric lesions in ex vivo porcine model study: A randomized controlled trial

Objective

To compare treatment outcomes between injection endoscopic submucosal dissection using ProKnife (P‐ESD) and conventional ESD (C‐ESD) for gastric lesions.

Methods

In this randomized controlled trial, we compared treatment outcomes of P‐ESD and C‐ESD for simulated gastric lesions ≥3 cm in resected porcine stomachs. Predictive factors associated with ESD difficulties were investigated using logistic regression analysis.

Results

Seventy lesions were screened; however, two lesions were excluded. A total of 12 endoscopists performed 68 ESDs: 34 P‐ESDs and 34 C‐ESDs. The ESD procedure time of P‐ESD (36.3 [28.4–46.8] min) was significantly shorter than that of C‐ESD (46 [36.4–64.6] min; p = 0.0014). The technical success rates did not differ between the P‐ESD and C‐ESD groups (en bloc resection rate, 100% in both groups; complete resection rate, 94.1% and 85.3%, respectively; p = 0.23). The number of injections during P‐ESD (7.5 [6–10] times) was significantly higher than during C‐ESD (4 [3–5] times; p < 0.001), but the total volume of injected solution during P‐ESD (20 [16–26.3] ml) was significantly smaller than during C‐ESD (27.5 [20–31.5] ml; p = 0.0019). In multivariate analysis, less ESD experience (odds ratio [OR], 3.9) and selection of C‐ESD as the ESD method (OR, 3.8) were independent predictive factors associated with ESD difficulties.

Conclusions

Compared with C‐ESD, P‐ESD had a shorter procedure time but also allowed for notable technical success and safety.

Endoscopic resection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Current indications and treatment outcomes

Endoscopic resection (ER) is an alternate minimally invasive treatment for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC). We aimed to review the clinical indications and treatment outcomes of ER for SESCC. Endoscopic mucosal resection is relatively easy and efficient for SESCC ≤ 15 mm. In contrast, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recommended to achieve en bloc resection for lesions >15 mm, in view of the accurate pathological evaluation. The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines recommend ER for non-circumferential cT1a-EP/LPM (epithelium/lamina propria mucosae), cT1a-MM/T1b-SM1 (muscularis mucosa/superficial submucosa ≤ 200μm) SESCC, and whole-circumferential T1a-EP/LPM SESCC ≤ 50 mm (upon implementing preventive measures for stenosis), considering the risk-benefit balance of ER. It defines pT1a-EP/LPM without lymphovascular invasion as a curative endoscopic resection. The guidelines recommend additional esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy for pT1b SESCC or any SESCC, with lymphovascular invasion. However, there is no recommendation for or against the administration of additional treatments for pT1a-MM without lymphovascular invasion, owing to limited evidence. Researchers have reported on high en bloc and R0 resection rates of ESD, and a randomized controlled trial demonstrated that clip-line traction-assisted ESD could significantly reduce the ESD procedural time. Moreover, steroid treatment has been developed to prevent post-ESD esophageal strictures. There have been reports on favorable long-term outcomes of ESD. However, most of them are retrospective studies. Further robust data in prospective trials are warranted to achieve a definitive evidence of ESD, which will be beneficial to patients with SESCC.

Endoscopic Management of Complex Colorectal Polyps: Current Insights and Future Trends

Most colorectal cancers arise from adenomatous polyps and sessile serrated lesions. Screening colonoscopy and therapeutic polypectomy can potentially reduce colorectal cancer burden by early detection and removal of these polyps, thus decreasing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Most endoscopists are skilled in detecting and removing the vast majority of polyps endoscopically during a routine colonoscopy. Polyps can be considered “complex” based on size, location, morphology, underlying scar tissue, which are not amenable to removal by conventional endoscopic polypectomy techniques. They are technically more challenging to resect and carry an increased risk of complications. Most of these polyps were used to be managed by surgical intervention in the past. Rapid advancement in endoscopic resection techniques has led to a decreasing role of surgery in managing these complex polyps. These endoscopic resection techniques do require an expert in the field and advanced equipment to perform the procedure. In this review, we discuss various advanced endoscopic techniques for the management of complex polyps.

Efficacy of Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose Compared to Sodium Hyaluronate as Submucosal Injectant for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Sodium hyaluronate (SH) is a useful submucosal injectant for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). On the other hand, sodium carboxymethylcellulose (SCMC), which has high viscosity, has also been applied clinically. We evaluated the efficacy of SCMC compared to that of SH in gastric ESD.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of 1.0% SCMC as the injectant (SCMC group) compared to 0.4% SH (SH group) for ESD of gastric neoplasms. The primary end point was the procedure time of ESD. Secondary end points were treatment outcomes such as en bloc and R0 resection rates, number of hemostases, amount of injectant, ease of treatment (visual analog scale, 1-10 points), adverse events, and rate of ulcer healing 8 weeks after ESD.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were enrolled between October 2014 and October 2018, and 30 patients were allocated in each group. The procedure time (mean ± SD, minutes) was not significantly different between the SCMC (74.7 ± 54.5) and SH groups (67.1 ± 41.4) (p = 0.547). Furthermore, there were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of en bloc and R0 resection rates, number of hemostases, amount of injectant, ease of treatment, and rate of ulcer healing. No serious adverse events were observed in either group.

CONCLUSION

SCMC was comparable to SH in terms of procedure time, treatment outcome, and ease and safety of treatment in gastric ESD. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the differences between the 2 injectants.

Safety and efficacy of water pressure endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors with submucosal fibrosis (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Colorectal neoplasms with submucosal fibrosis are the most challenging targets of endoscopic resection. Water pressure endoscopic submucosal dissection (WP-ESD) is a recently introduced procedure that has several advantages over conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of WP-ESD for fibrotic colorectal neoplasms.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study investigated 133 colorectal neoplasms expected to have submucosal fibrosis that were resected by WP-ESD or C-ESD between April 2012 and April 2020. Eighty-seven lesions after endoscopic or surgical treatment, 18 with biopsy scar with fold convergence and 28 in patients with ulcerative colitis, were included. The differences in treatment outcomes, including procedure time and adverse event proportions, between the WP-ESD and C-ESD groups were analyzed. The clinical course after perforation using WP-ESD was also evaluated, including postprocedural multidetector CT findings obtained immediately after WP-ESD.

RESULTS

Severe submucosal fibrosis was observed in 96 lesions (72.2%). The median procedure time was significantly shorter in the WP-ESD group than in the C-ESD group (43.5 minutes [interquartile range {IQR}, 32.8-73] vs 72 minutes [IQR, 45-105]; P = .0041). The multivariate analysis revealed WP-ESD as an independent factor for a short procedure time (odds ratio, 2.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-6.55). The proportions of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (11.6% vs 13.1%) and perforation (20.4% vs 22.8%) were similar between the groups. Four of 11 patients with perforation who underwent WP-ESD showed fluid collection on postprocedural multidetector CT images.

CONCLUSIONS

WP-ESD can shorten procedure time for treating fibrotic colorectal neoplasms.

An innovative next-generation endoscopic submucosal injection material with a 2-step injection system (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Next-generation submucosal injection materials (SIMs) with higher performance and flexibility than the current SIMs (eg, 0.4% sodium hyaluronate solution [HA]) are expected to improve the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) but are difficult to develop. We developed a next-generation SIM by devising a 2-solution-type SIM comprising 2.0% calcium chloride solution (Ca) and 0.4% sodium alginate solution (SA) and evaluated its performance.

METHODS

Viscoelasticity, submucosal elevation height, and injection pressure of HA, SA, and the next-generation SIM were measured. Outcomes of ESDs on pseudo-lesions in ex vivo porcine stomach/colon models were compared.

RESULTS

The dramatic increase in SA viscoelasticity with the addition of Ca facilitated the formation of highly viscous submucosal cushions that can be controlled by endoscopists. The submucosal elevation height of the next-generation SIM was significantly higher than that of HA or SA with the same injection pressure. The ESD procedure time using the next-generation SIM was significantly shorter than that using HA or SA (14.2 ± 6.1 vs 29.2 ± 9.1 minutes, P = .0004, or 14.2 ± 6.1 vs 29.1 ± 5.9 minutes, P <.0001). Furthermore, the total injection volume for the next-generation SIM was considerably lower than that for HA or SA (7.0 ± 0.9 vs 17.2 ± 3.4 mL, P <.0001, or 7.0 ± 0.9 vs 16.2 ± 2.9 mL, P <.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed an ideal next-generation SIM that achieved high performance and high flexibility in ex vivo models. Our findings warrant further investigations in a patient population.

Efficacy and safety of a novel submucosal injection solution for endoscopic resection in porcine models

OBJECTIVE

A submucosal injection is usually required to improve the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). This study aimed to evaluate the performance of 3.3% sodium carboxymethyl starch (Na-CMS) solution, a novel submucosal injection solution, for ESD and EMR.

METHODS

Na-CMS, normal saline (NS) and two commercially available agents (sigMAVisc and Eleview) were injected into the esophageal submucosa of randomly grouped pigs. The level of submucosal elevation was examined. Subsequently, ESD or EMR procedures using 3.3% Na-CMS or NS as submucosal injections were performed in the gastrointestinal tract of the pigs.

RESULTS

Submucosal elevation was significantly higher and more sustained in the 3.3% Na-CMS group than in the controls (P < 0.05). The volume required for ESD or EMR was significantly lower in the 3.3% Na-CMS group than in the NS group (ESD: 12.21 ± 4.09 mL vs 28.25 ± 8.02 mL, P < 0.001; EMR: 3.99 ± 1.98 mL vs 7.15 ± 3.67 mL, P = 0.001). The ESD resection time was significantly shorter in the 3.3% Na-CMS group than in the NS group (16.58 ± 7.30 min vs 25.29 ± 11.89 min, P = 0.004). Hemorrhage after ESD in the 3.3% Na-CMS group was less severe than that in the NS group (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

3.3% Na-CMS is an effective, safe and low-cost submucosal injection solution and holds promise as preferable agent for submucosal injection in ESD and EMR procedures.

ESD and Pit Pattern Diagnosis: Lessons from a Japanese Endoscopist Working in the United States

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed in 2000s to overcome the limitations of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), especially to accomplish en-bloc resection, and it has been accepted worldwide in the past decades. Many ESD devices and diagnosis modalities are currently available, which include pit pattern and narrow band imaging (NBI) diagnoses to evaluate the depth of the tumor preoperatively with sensitivities of 70 to 90%. Depending on the Japanese colorectal guideline, the intramucosal cancer and shallow invasion of the submucosal layer are the main good indications of ESD; however, the ESD practices between Japan and Western countries still vary, including pathologic definition of cancer, tumor/node/metastasis classification, and handling of ESD specimen. In the United States, despite the large demand for treatment of colorectal neoplasm, pit pattern and magnified NBI diagnoses are not widely accepted yet, and piecemeal EMR is still the major method in most of the institutions. Moreover, the specific guideline of ESD is also not available yet. More new technologies are being developed other than conventional ESD methods in Eastern and Western countries, and ESD is now expected to change in the next generation. It is recommended that not only gastroenterologists but also colorectal surgeons have appropriate knowledge of colorectal lesions and their management to ensure current treatments is applied to patients.

EMR/ESD: Techniques, Complications, and Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss endoscopic resection techniques of early gastrointestinal malignancy. The review will focus on the indications and outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

RECENT FINDINGS

EMR is indicated for upper GI lesions less than 20 mm provided they can be easily lifted and have a low risk of submucosal invasion (SMI). ESD should be considered for esophageal and gastric lesions that are bulky, show intramucosal carcinoma, or have a risk of superficial submucosal invasion. With regard to colonic polyps, EMR is acceptable for the removal of large colonic polyps using a piecemeal technique. ESD can be reserved for rectal neuroendocrine tumors, fibrotic polyps, or polyps harboring early malignancy. In selected cases, particularly in lesions less than 2 cm in size, EMR can be safe and effective. For larger lesions or lesions with submucosal invasion, ESD is effective and curative. Choosing the best approach can be tailored for each patient depending on lesion size, pathology, and availability of local expertise.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection: an update on tools and accessories

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive therapeutic procedure to remove larger polyps or early non-metastatic lesions. It has long been used in Asia, but is now fast growing in popularity in the West. There are multiple challenges faced by ESD practitioners. While the practice of ESD in gastric lesions is relatively well established, the oesophagus with its narrow lumen and challenging workspace, and the colon with its tortuous course and folds are more challenging frontiers. The nature of performing a procedure endoscopically means that conventional methods offer no mechanism for providing counter-traction while performing dissection, impeding visibility and increasing the rate of complications. There are a multitude of tools available to those performing ESD for the different stages of the procedure. This article reviews the accessories currently used in regular ESD practice including the knives used to cut and dissect lesions, the cap and hood devices used to improve visibility and safety, injection fluids to lift the submucosal plane, haemostatic devices, generators, and finally, emerging traction apparatus. There is some evidence behind the use of these tools, however, ESD remains the domain of a small number of practitioners and the practice relies heavily on expert experience. Evolution of the ESD toolbox will make the procedure more accessible to more endoscopists, which in turn will drive the development of a more substantial evidence base to evaluate efficacy and safety of the multitude of tools.

EndoClot®SIS Polysaccharide Injection as a Submucosal Fluid Cushion for Endoscopic Mucosal Therapies: Results of Ex Vivo and In Vivo Studies

BACKGROUND

There are many studies on submucosal injection materials, but their clinical use is restricted for various reasons. The objective of this study was to compare the feasibility and safety of injected EndoClot^®SIS polysaccharide as a submucosal injection material (SFC) in ESD in the pig stomach to that of injected sigMAVisc™ or Eleview™.

METHODS

Four pig stomachs were used for the ex vivo study. Eighteen pigs were used for the in vivo study. In the ex vivo study, four injections were made in the gastric submucosa to induce submucosal uplift and extend its duration. Tissue change was observed. The in vivo study was performed in 2 steps. First, 3 injections were made in the esophageal mucosa to induce submucosal uplift and extend its duration. Histological change was observed. Second, ESD was performed in the stomach by injecting EndoClot^®SIS polysaccharide, sigMAVisc™, or Eleview™ (each, n = 6) as an SFC. The effects of these agents on wound healing were examined. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic surgery after EndoClot^®SIS polysaccharide injection.

RESULTS

EndoClot^®SIS polysaccharide produced a longer-lasting elevation with clearer margins than was achieved by sigMAVisc™, Eleview™, or 0.9% NaCl and thereby enabled precise ESD without complications, such as bleeding and perforation. No obvious histopathological damage was observed at the injection site on endoscopy and histology.

CONCLUSION

Submucosally injected EndoClot^®SIS polysaccharide increased the effective separation of the mucosa and submucosa and reduced surgical complications. Hence, EndoClot^®SIS polysaccharide injection is a safe and effective submucosal injection material.

Efficacy and safety of 0.6% sodium alginate solution in endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal and gastric neoplastic lesion: A randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVES

Sodium alginate (SA) solution has characteristic viscoelasticity. We aimed to determine efficacy and safety of 0.6% SA for submucosal injection during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with localized neoplastic lesion in the esophageal and gastric mucosa.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled study at six major hospitals in Japan including 130 patients with endoscopically localized neoplastic lesion in the esophageal and gastric mucosa and eligible for ESD. Patients were randomly assigned to SA or 0.4% sodium hyaluronate (SH) group (control); ESD was performed using a submucosal injection of SA/SH. As a primary outcome measure, non-inferiority of SA against SH was investigated using en bloc complete resection in ESD and formation and maintenance of mucosal elevation upon injection as an efficacy index. Adverse events during the study were evaluated as safety outcome measures. This study was registered with Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (clinical trial no. 28-277/2016-18; clinical trial identification no. KP2013-009_C001).

RESULTS

Efficacy rate of submucosal injection during ESD was 91.7% (55/60) and 88.7% (55/62) in the SA and SH groups, respectively, demonstrating non-inferiority of SA against SH. Adverse events for which a causal relationship with submucosal injection solution could not be eliminated were noted in 8.2% (5/61) and 4.7% (3/64) in the SA and SH groups, respectively, but symptoms disappeared without treatment/after drug administration in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In Japan, 0.4% SH is the only commercially approved formulation for submucosal injection during ESD. The study results may expand submucosal injection solution options in clinical practice.

Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in the remnant stomach after gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) in the remnant stomach is a minimally invasive treatment. Few studies compared the technical difficulty of ESD involving the suture line and anastomosis, and information on long-term outcomes is insufficient. This study aimed to elucidate the short- and long-term outcomes of ESD for EGC in the remnant stomach.

METHODS

We investigated patients who underwent ESD for EGC in the remnant stomach between September 2002 and March 2016. Clinicopathological data were retrieved to assess en bloc resection rates, complications, and long-term outcomes including overall survival and cause-specific survival.

RESULTS

A total of 136 consecutive patients with 165 lesions resected by 157 ESD procedures were retrospectively evaluated. The en bloc resection rate was 95.5%. Complications included 16 intraoperative perforations (10.2%), 2 delayed perforations (1.3%), and 15 delayed bleeding (9.6%), which were successfully treated with endoscopy. The en bloc resection rate was significantly higher in the suture line group (100%) and the non-anastomosis or suture line group (98.8%) than in the anastomosis group (82.9%). However, the intraoperative perforation rate was significantly higher in the anastomosis group (31.4%) than in other groups. The 5-year overall and cause-specific survival rates were 88.4% and 97.6%, respectively, during a median follow-up period of 50.7 months (interquartile range 30.8-91.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term outcomes of ESD for EGC in the remnant stomach were favorable. However, ESD involving the anastomosis was a technically demanding procedure due to the low en bloc resection rate and high perforation rate.

Thermoresponsive aerification and tissue vacuolization for facilitating endoscopic submucosal resection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Mucosal lifting and its persistence are critical for maintaining the operational space and preventing perforation in endoscopic operation. Although numerous agents have been investigated, optimization is still required for improving their clinical performance. In the present study, we proposed a novel concept of thermoresponsive aerification and tissue vacuolization for submucosal injection.

METHODS

Lifting performance and operational condition were first evaluated in porcine stomachs in vitro and rabbits in vivo. Dodecafluoropentane (DDFP) injection dosage, lifting persistency and operational assistance were quantitatively recorded. Gross and histological pathology were also analyzed to identify DDFP acute toxicity and long-term safety. The endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure with DDFP was carried out on pigs in vivo to confirm its operational feasibility, efficacy, and safety.

RESULTS

Dodecafluoropentane aerification could achieve better mucosal lift with lower dosage (1% of normal saline dosage). Thermoresponsive DDFP aerification could provide continuous replenishment and longer persistence. Meanwhile, its tissue vacuolization effect significantly facilitated submucosal tissue dissection in in vitro study. Similar performance was verified in vivo. The particular vacuole-like submucosal structure was seen after DDFP onset, which also promoted reepithelization and wound healing. No tissue damage, gas embolism, biotoxicity, and physicochemical risk were observed.

CONCLUSION

Bioinert DDFP was feasible, efficient, and safe as the novel submucosal lifting candidate.

A New Ex Vivo Model for the Evaluation of Endoscopic Submucosal Injection Material Performance

Increasing the performance of submucosal injection materials (SIMs) is important for endoscopic therapy of early gastrointestinal cancer. It is essential to establish an ex vivo model that can evaluate SIM performance accurately, for developing high-performance SIMs. In our previous study, we developed a new ex vivo model that can be used to evaluate the performance of various SIMs in detail by applying constant tension to the specimen's ends. We also confirmed that the proposed new ex vivo model allows accurate submucosal elevation height (SEH) measurement under uniform conditions and detailed comparisons of the performances of various types of SIMs. Here, we describe the new ex vivo model and explain the detailed setup methodology of this model. Since all parts of the new model were easy to obtain, the setup of the new model could be completed quickly. SEH of various SIMs could be measured more accurately by using the new model. The critical factor that determines SIM performance can be identified using the new model. SIM development speed will drastically increase after the factor has been identified.

Identification of the critical viscoelastic factor in the performance of submucosal injection materials

High-performance submucosal injection materials (SIMs) contribute to the success of endoscopic therapy for early-stage gastrointestinal neoplasms. This study aimed to identify the most important factor (viscoelastic parameter) that determines SIM performance and the ease of injection. To determine the ideal viscoelastic parameters of SIMs, submucosal elevation heights (SEHs) and the ease of submucosal injection [characterized by injection pressures (IPs)] were evaluated using a newly developed ex vivo model, in which a constant tension was applied to the studied specimen. The strongest positive correlation was observed between the loss modulus determined at an oscillation frequency of 0.1 rad/s and SEH (correlation coefficient > 0.9) and between the loss modulus at 10 rad/s and IP (correlation coefficient > 0.9). SIMs with high loss moduli (0.1 rad/s) also contributed to maintenance of the submucosal elevation. Moreover, the SEHs of pseudoplastic fluid SIMs (whose loss moduli increased slightly with increasing angular frequency) were greater than those of Newtonian fluid SIMs (whose loss modulus increased drastically with increasing angular frequency). In this study, the ideal viscoelastic SIM parameters were clarified. The loss modulus (0.1 rad/s) was the most important viscoelastic factor affecting SIM performance. Additionally, the development of pseudoplastic fluid SIMs may lead to the creation of next-generation SIMs, with a performance superior to that of sodium hyaluronate, which is currently used widely in endoscopic treatments.

Utility and performance characteristics of a novel submucosal injection agent (EleviewTM) for endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection

Background

Submucosal injection of a lifting agent is a critical step in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Literature suggests superiority of other viscous solutions over normal saline (NS), but research to determine the ideal submucosal injection is still ongoing. In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated the utility and performance characteristics of a novel submucosal injection agent (Eleview^TM) for EMR and ESD.

Methods

Twelve consecutive patients referred for EMR/ESD to a tertiary referral center with experienced large polyp expert were prospectively enrolled. Ten patients with large colon polyps (mean age 66.3 years), and one patient each with esophageal and gastric lesions were included. Eleview^TM was injected as submucosal lifting agent, and EMR/ESD performed. Main outcome measurements included the duration of submucosal elevation, volume and number of injections required to maintain cushion, and complications.

Results

Single injection of 3-5 cc of Eleview^TM outlasted the duration of EMR. However, mean duration of cushion achieved during longer procedures (ESD) was 12.5 min, requiring several additional injections. R0 resection was achieved in 10/12 patients. One patient had minor bleeding which was managed intra-operatively.

Conclusions

Eleview^TM was successful in achieving long duration of submucosal elevation, allowing safe and efficient performance of EMR as a single injection, but needed repeated injections during longer ESD procedures. Prospective controlled trials are required to compare its performance to other available viscous submucosal solutions.

Optimal injection solution for endoscopic submucosal dissection: A randomized controlled trial of Western solutions in a porcine model

BACKGROUND AND AIM

When carrying out endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), procedural safety increases with greater tissue elevation and efficiency increases with longer-lasting submucosal cushion. Fluids specifically developed for ESD in Asia are not commercially available in the West, leaving endoscopists to use a variety of injectable fluids off-label. To determine the optimal fluid available in the West, we compared commonly used fluids for Western ESD.

METHODS

All phases were carried out in an ex vivo porcine stomach model. Phase 1 compared tissue elevation and duration of submucosal cushions produced by various standard volumes of various injectable solutions used for ESD. The two best-performing solutions used off-label were tested head-to-head in ESD in Phase 2. Phase 3 compared the best solution from Phase 2 to Eleview^® , currently the only submucosal injection fluid approved in the USA. In Phases 2 and 3, five ESD were carried out with each solution. The solutions were randomized and the endoscopist blinded to the solution.

RESULTS

The best-performing solutions in Phase 1 were 0.4% hyaluronic acid, 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES), and Eleview^® . Phase 2 compared 6% HES and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), showing that ESD with 6% HES was easier (P = 0.007), faster (P = 0.041) and required less injection volume (P = 0.003). In Phase 3, resection speed, ease of ESD and total volume per area resected were comparable between 6% HES and Eleview^® .

CONCLUSIONS

Of the submucosal injection fluids currently available in the West, Eleview^® and 6% HES are the best-performing solutions for ESD in a porcine model.

Development of a new ex vivo model for evaluation of endoscopic submucosal injection materials performance

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Development of high-performance submucosal injection materials (SIMs) contribute to the advancement of endoscopic therapy for early-stage gastrointestinal neoplasms. This study aimed to develop a new ex vivo model that mimics the human gastrointestinal tract to evaluate the performance (the height and duration of the submucosal elevation) of various SIMs in detail.

METHODS

A new ex vivo model that applies a constant tension to the tested specimen (the porcine gastric specimen) was developed. SIMs were injected into the submucosa at the center or edge of the tested specimen, and submucosal elevation heights (SEHs) were measured over time.

RESULTS

The average value and standard deviation of SEH determined using the conventional model (the tested specimen was fixed with pins) were higher than those obtained using the new model, which showed that the new model could precisely measure the SEH of a given SIM. In addition, the performance (SEH) of SIMs decreased with increasing tension applied to the specimen, suggesting that the performance of SIMs deteriorates with the over-expansion of the gastrointestinal tract. The submucosal elevation formed at the specimen edge disappeared faster than that formed at the specimen's center.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed new ex vivo model allows accurate SEH measurement under uniform conditions and detailed comparison of the performances of various types of SIMs and can contribute to the development of high-performance materials.

The feasibility of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of residual or recurrent tumor localized in therapeutic scar tissue

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is used to treat superficial colorectal tumors. Previous studies have reported the efficacy of ESD for treating residual or local recurrent colorectal tumors. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of ESD in treating these lesions and to assess factors that prevent successful ESD.

METHODS

 This retrospective study assessed 25 cases of residual or local recurrent lesions that were previously treated using EMR (18 lesions), TEM (5 lesions), ESD (1 lesion) or surgery (1 lesion), and 459 primary lesions treated using ESD between April 2008 and September 2015. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment outcome and adverse events were compared between groups with or without scar tissue. Factors related to perforation and a prolonged treatment time, which indicate the likelihood of technical difficulties, were identified using multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In residual or local recurrent lesions groups, patients experienced more perforations (32 % vs 4 %, P  < 0.001) and required a longer treatment time (117 min vs 61 min, P  < 0.001) compared with the primary lesions group. Both groups showed a similar curative resection rate. Emergency surgery was not needed in any case. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that tumor location and therapeutic scar tissue were high risk factors for perforation, and that large tumor size and therapeutic scar tissue were high risk factors for prolonged treatment time.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD for residual or local recurrent colorectal tumors is a technically challenging, but effective and minimally invasive treatment. When performed carefully with sufficient proficiency, it is a useful treatment option.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early stage esophageal cancer

Mortality from esophageal cancer remains high despite advances in medical therapy. Although the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus remains unchanged, the incidence of the esophageal adenocarcinoma has increased over time. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD and obesity are contributing factors to the development of Barrett's esophagus and subsequent development of adenocarcinoma. Early recognition of the disease can lead to resection of esophageal cancer prior to the development of lymphovascular invasion. Various modalities have been implemented to aid identification of precancerous lesions and early esophageal cancer. Chromoendoscopy, narrowband imaging and endoscopic ultrasound examination are typically used for evaluating early esophageal lesions. Recently, confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) and volumetric laser scanning were implemented with promising results. Endoscopic management of early esophageal cancer may be done using endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Both techniques allow resection of the mucosa (and possibly a portion of the submucosa) containing the early tumor without interruption of deeper layers. A submucosal injection creating a cushion coupled with snare resection or cap assisted mucosal suction followed by ligation and snare resection are the most common techniques of EMR. EMR can remove lesions less than 2 cm in size en bloc. Larger lesions may require resection in piecemeal fashion. This may limit assessment of the margins of the lesion and orienting the lesion's border. ESD offers en bloc dissection of the lesion regardless of its size. ESD is performed with specialized needle knives, which allow incision followed by careful dissection of the lesion within the submucosal layer. Tumor recurrence after ESD is rare but the technique is labor intensive and has an increased risk of perforation. Esophageal stenosis remains a concern after extensive EMR or ESD. Dilation with balloon or stent placement is usually sufficient to treat post-resection stenosis.

Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection using sodium carboxymethylcellulose as a new injection substance

AIM

To investigate the feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using sodium carboxymethylcellulose (SCMC) for gastric cancer.

METHODS

During October 2011 through April 2013, 98 lesions from 98 patients who underwent ESD using SCMC (ESD-SCMC) for early gastric cancer were enrolled in this study.　Two endoscopists, who had each performed fewer than 30 ESD procedures (less-experienced ESD physicians), performed ESD-SCMC under the supervision of two experts.　The primary outcome was the en bloc resection rate.　Secondary outcomes included the complete resection rate, the procedural time, the bleeding rate after SCMC injection, and complications.　Patient characteristics, time necessary for hemostasis after SCMC injection, rate of treatment completion by less-experienced ESD physicians alone, and the effects of SCMC during ESD and on resected specimens were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The en bloc resection rate was 100%.　Among these resections, 87.8% of the cases were completed by a less-experienced ESD physician alone.　The complete resection rate was 98.0%.　The mean total procedural time was 75.4 min.　The mean incidence of intraoperative bleeding following SCMC local injection was 1.7 times.　No bleeding was observed after SCMC injection in 29.6% of cases (29/98).　Five complications occurred: one case of microperforation (1.0%) and four cases of postoperative bleeding (4.0%).　SCMC remained in the submucosa.　The submucosa was readily manipulated when the deep submucosa was dissected, even after placing the specimen on a slide.

CONCLUSION

ESD-SCMC is feasible for the resection of early gastric cancer.

Detection and Management of Early Gastric Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Early gastric cancer (EGC), defined as being confined to the submucosa, is a curable condition. In recent years, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have been widely applied to subgroups of mucosal cancers, thereby avoiding the burden of operation while preserving gastric function. However, it can be difficult to identify mucosal cancers, which often evade detection due to their flat shapes without ulceration. Proper preparation to clean the mucosal surface, detailed systematic observation of the entire stomach, and the use of high-resolution systems for both endoscopies equipped with image-enhanced modality and monitors would facilitate the detection of such lesions. It is also critical to evaluate the resected specimen to confirm completeness of resection (tumor-free lateral and vertical margins as well as the absence of lymphatic and vascular invasion). If the resection is incomplete, further treatment is usually recommended-further endoscopic resection for patients with positive lateral margins or surgery for patients with positive vertical margins or with lymphatic or vascular involvement. The five-year survival for endoscopically resected EGC is excellent-and comparable to that of surgical therapy. Since most gastric cancers are caused by Helicobacter pylori, this infection should be tested for routinely. If a patient is H. pylori-positive, eradication is recommended, as heterotopic, metachronous recurrence of EGC is subsequently reduced. Importantly, basic principles for early diagnosis and endoscopic treatment of EGC can be applied to neoplasms arising in other parts of the gut, such as the esophagus and colon, and would be beneficial for patients through preserving organ function and minimizing operative intervention.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection

ESD is an established effective treatment modality for premalignant and early-stage malignant lesions of the stomach, esophagus, and colorectum. Compared with EMR, ESD is generally associated with higher rates of en bloc, R0, and curative resections and a lower rate of local recurrence. Oncologic outcomes with ESD compare favorably with competing surgical interventions, and ESD also serves as an excellent T-staging tool to identify noncurative resections that will require further treatment. ESD is technically demanding and has a higher rate of adverse events than most endoscopic procedures including EMR. As such,sufficient training is critical to ensure safe conduct and high-quality resections. A standardized training model for Western endoscopists has not been clearly established,but will be self-directed and include courses, animal model training, and optimally an observership at an expert center.Numerous dedicated ESD devices are now available in the United States from different manufacturers. Although the use of ESD in the United States is increasing, issues related to technical difficulty, limited training opportunities and mentors, risk of adverse events, long procedure duration,and suboptimal reimbursement may limit ESD adoption in the United States to a modest number of academic referral centers for the foreseeable future.

Solutions for submucosal injection in endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Submucosal injection is standard practice in endoscopic mucosal resection of gastrointestinal lesions. Several solutions are used. Our aim was to systematically review their efficacy and safety.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using a random effects model of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from MEDLINE. Studies in animal models were qualitatively assessed for efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

In total, 54 studies were qualitatively assessed. Eleven RCTs were analyzed, two of which were on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The quantitative synthesis included nine RCTs on endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), comprising 792 subjects and 793 lesions. Mean lesion size was 20.9 mm (range 8.5 - 46 mm). A total of 209 lesions were randomized to sodium hyaluronate (SH) vs normal saline (NS), 72 to 50 % dextrose (D50) vs NS, 82 to D50 vs SH, 43 to succinylated gelatin, 25 to hydroxyethyl starch and 36 to fibrinogen. In total, 385 were randomized to NS as controls. NS and SH are the best studied solutions and seem to be equally effective in achieving complete resection (OR 1.09; 95 %CI 0.82, 1.45). No solution was proven to be superior in complete resection rate, post-polypectomy bleeding or coagulation syndrome/perforation incidence. Many solutions have been tested in animal studies and most seem more effective for mucosal elevation than NS.

CONCLUSIONS

There are several solutions in clinical use and many more under research, but most are poorly studied. SH seems to be clinically equivalent to NS. There are no significant differences in post-polypectomy complications. Larger RCTs are needed to determine any small differences that may exist between solutions.

A feasibility study of a thermally sensitive elastin-like polypeptide for submucosal injection application in endoscopic resection in 3 animal models

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can successfully resect large lesions en bloc by using a submucosal injection solution, but the cost of currently available submucosal injection solutions is not satisfactory. The authors' aim was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a thermally sensitive elastin-like polypeptide (ELP) used as submucosal injection solution in ESD.

METHODS

We conducted an ex vivo study to determine the optimal concentration of ELPs in rabbits, an in vivo study to evaluate the effectiveness of mucosal elevation in rats, and a large animal study to confirm the feasibility of preclinical application by using conventional clinical procedure in pigs.

RESULTS

ELP (500 μM) was proved to be the optimal injectable submucosal injection solution and elevated mucosa more efficiently than any control. The same concentration of ELP exhibited an equivalent effectiveness of mucosal elevation, the retention of the elevation, and minimal bleeding with sodium hyaluronate. The ESD procedure time with 500 μM ELP in a preclinical study with pigs was significantly shorter than with any other concentration of ELP and normal saline solution.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of ELP as submucosal injection solution was feasible, with higher and longer-lasting elevation and fewer adverse events.

Usefulness of Ready-to-Use 0.4% Sodium Hyaluronate (Endo-Ease) in the Endoscopic Resection of Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Commercially available sodium hyaluronate solutions are usually too thick to inject through catheters and need dilution with normal saline (NS) before use, which increases the risk of contamination. We evaluated the usefulness of ready-to-use 0.4% sodium hyaluronate, Endo-Ease (EE; UNIMED Pharm. Inc., Seoul, Korea).

METHODS

We performed a prospective multicenter randomized study from May 2011 to September 2012. Patients requiring endoscopic resection (ER) for gastric or colorectal neoplasm at two referral hospitals were enrolled.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-four patients (72 with a gastric neoplasm and 82 with a colorectal neoplasm) were included in intention-to-treat analysis. Thirty-seven gastric neoplasms and 43 colorectal neoplasms were enrolled in the EE group. The usefulness rate was significantly higher in the EE group than in the NS group (89.2% vs. 60.0% for gastric neoplasms and 95.3% vs. 67.7% for colorectal neoplasms, p<0.001). In the EE group, the ease of mucosal resection was significantly higher than in the NS group (p<0.001). The injected volume was smaller in the EE group than in the NS group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of EE reduced the need for additional injections and improved the ease of ER. A submucosal injection of EE is useful for the ER of both gastric and colorectal neoplasms.

Endoscopic mucosal resection

EMR has become an established therapeutic option for premalignant and early-stage GI malignancies, particularly in the esophagus and colon. EMR can also aid in the diagnosis and therapy of subepithelial lesions localized to the muscularis mucosa or submucosa. Several dedicated EMR devices are available to facilitate these procedures. Adverse event rates, particularly bleeding and perforation, are higher after EMR relative to other basic endoscopic interventions but lower than adverse event rates for ESD. Endoscopists performing EMR should be knowledgeable and skilled in managing potential adverse events resulting from EMR.

Improving complete EMR of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized trial comparing snares and injectate in the resection of large sessile colon polyps

BACKGROUND

There are few randomized studies examining efficacy of snares and agents in EMR.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the use of a combined needle and snare unit with injectate versus a spiral wire and injectate (primary); saline solution versus hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (secondary).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, factorial, single center.

SETTING

Tertiary-care academic medical center.

PATIENTS

A total of 140 patients with large (>15 mm), sessile, colorectal polyps.

INTERVENTIONS

Polyps randomized to either 1 of 2 snare types and 1 of 2 injectates.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Primary-the Sydney resection quotient (SRQ), defined as the size of the polyp divided by the number of pieces resected and the amount of tissue per snare attempt. Secondary-procedure time, adverse events, residual neoplasia at follow-up.

RESULTS

The SRQ was higher with the combined unit (median 13.8 mm vs 7.1 mm; P = .019); additionally, procedure time was less (median 6 vs 11 minutes; P < .001). Resection was considered complete after the EMR in 62% (42/68) with the combined needle and snare unit versus 51% (37/72; P = .22) with the spiral wire. Rates of adverse events were similar. Residual neoplasia was found at follow-up in 22% (10/46) with the combined needle and snare unit versus 21% (10/48; P = .89) with the spiral wire. There was no evidence of differences in outcomes by lifting agent.

LIMITATIONS

The SRQ is only a surrogate marker.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that the integrated needle-snare may be superior to the snare alone for the removal of large, flat polyps. Additionally, the type of injectate appears to have no impact on outcome.

Submucosal injection solution for endoscopic resection in gastrointestinal tract: a traditional and network meta-analysis

Objective. To explore and define the current optimal submucosal injection solution used in ESD and EMR for gastrointestinal tract neoplasms in terms of clinical outcomes and other aspects. Methods. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and clinical trials register center were searched with terms of “endoscopic resection” and “submucosal injection solution” to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Both direct comparison using traditional meta-analysis method and indirect comparison using network meta-analysis method were performed. Results. A total of 11 RCTs with 1152 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that, compared with normal saline, other submucosal injection solutions induced a significant increase in terms of en bloc resection rate (I² = 0%, OR = 2.11, 95% CI (1.36, 3.26), and P = 0.008) and complete resection rate (I² = 0%, OR = 2.14, 95% CI (1.41, 3.24), and P = 0.0003); and there was no significant difference in the incidence of total complications (I² = 0%, OR = 0.87, 95% CI (0.59, 1.29), and P = 0.49). Conclusions. Other newly developed submucosal injection solutions significantly increased en bloc resection rate and complete resection rate and decreased bleeding rate and finical cost of endoscopic resection in gastrointestinal tract, while current evidence did not find the difference between them, which need to be explored by further studies.

Evaluation of 0.6% sodium alginate as a submucosal injection material in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We have focused on sodium alginate (SA) solution as a potential submucosal injection material for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). A previous SA solution had high viscosity and problems such as difficult handling. After its properties were adjusted, SA solution was examined in vitro and its clinical safety was evaluated.

METHODS

With 0.4% sodium hyaluronate (SH) solution as a control, catheter injectability and mucosa-elevating capacity of 0.3-0.8% SA solutions were evaluated. Next, 0.6% SA solution was used for ESD in 10 patients with early gastric cancer in a prospective clinical study.

RESULTS

Compared with 0.4% SH solution, 0.6% SA solution exhibited no significant difference in catheter injectability but significant superiority in mucosa-elevating capacity. In the clinical study, no adverse events were observed in any patient.

CONCLUSION

The safety of 0.6% SA solution as a submucosal injection material was confirmed and it is suggested that its efficacy should be investigated in a larger number of cases.

Gastric ESD: current status and future directions of devices and training

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of early gastric cancer, which has been proved to be safe and effective and is the established standard of care in Japan, has become increasingly established worldwide in the past decade. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is superior to EMR, as it is designed to provide precise pathologic staging and long-term curative therapy based on an en bloc R0 specimen irrespective of the size and/or location of the tumor. However, ESD requires highly skilled and experienced endoscopists. The introduction of ESD to the Western world necessitates collaborations between Eastern and Western endoscopists, pathologists, and surgeons.