1
|
Wang KK. Does radiofrequency ablation affect endoscopic submucosal dissection in Barrett's esophagus? Endoscopy 2024; 56:663-664. [PMID: 39019464 DOI: 10.1055/a-2350-3066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
|
2
|
Kumar A, Rara M, Yu M, Wen KW, Grady WM, Chak A, Iyer PG, Rustgi AK, Wang TC, Rubenstein JH, Liu Y, Kresty L, Westerhoff M, Kwon RS, Wamsteker E, Wang T, Berry L, Canto MI, Shaheen NJ, Wang KK, Abrams JA, Stachler MD. Molecular Analysis of Persistent and Recurrent Barrett's Esophagus in the Setting of Endoscopic Therapy. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2024; 15:e00751. [PMID: 39007490 PMCID: PMC11346883 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Early neoplastic progression of Barrett's esophagus (BE) is often treated with endoscopic therapy. Although effective, some patients are refractory to therapy or recur after apparent eradication of the BE. The goal of this study was to determine whether genomic alterations within the treated BE may be associated with persistent or recurrent disease. METHODS We performed DNA sequencing on pre-treatment esophageal samples from 45 patients who were successfully treated by endoscopic therapy and did not recur as well as pre-treatment and post-treatment samples from 40 patients who had persistent neoplasia and 21 patients who had recurrent neoplasia. The genomic alterations were compared between groups. RESULTS The genomic landscape was similar between all groups. Patients with persistent disease were more likely to have pre-treatment alterations involving the receptor tyrosine kinase pathway ( P = 0.01), amplifications of oncogenes ( P = 0.01), and deletions of tumor suppressor genes ( P = 0.02). These associations were no longer significant after adjusting for patient age and BE length. More than half of patients with persistent (52.5%) or recurrent (57.2%) disease showed pre-treatment and post-treatment samples that shared at least 50% of their driver mutations. DISCUSSION Pre-treatment samples were genomically similar between those who responded to endoscopic therapy and those who had persistent or recurrent disease, suggesting there is not a strong genomic component to treatment response. Although it was expected to find shared driver mutations in pre-treatment and post-treatment samples in patients with persistent disease, the finding that an equal number of patients with recurrent disease also showed this relation suggests that many recurrences represent undetected minimal residual disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aarti Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marianne Rara
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ming Yu
- Translation Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kwun Wah Wen
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - William M. Grady
- Translation Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Amitabh Chak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Prasad G. Iyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anil K. Rustgi
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Timothy C. Wang
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joel H. Rubenstein
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Rogel Cancer Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Center for Clinical Management Research, LTC Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Yue Liu
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Rogel Cancer Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Laura Kresty
- Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, and Rogel Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Maria Westerhoff
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Richard S. Kwon
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Rogel Cancer Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Erik Wamsteker
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Rogel Cancer Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Tom Wang
- Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Rogel Cancer Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Lynne Berry
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Marcia I. Canto
- Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nicholas J. Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kenneth K. Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Julian A. Abrams
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Matthew D. Stachler
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garg S, Xie J, Inamdar S, Thomas SL, Trindade AJ. Spatial distribution of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus segments before and after endoscopic ablation therapy: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2021; 53:6-14. [PMID: 32503057 DOI: 10.1055/a-1195-1000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE) is focal and difficult to locate. The aim of this meta-analysis was to understand the spatial distribution of dysplasia in BE before and after endoscopic ablation therapy. METHODS A systematic search was performed of multiple databases to July 2019. The location of dysplasia prior to ablation was determined using a clock-face orientation (right or left half of the esophagus). The location of the dysplasia post-ablation was classified as within the tubular esophagus or at the top of the gastric folds (TGF). RESULTS 13 studies with 2234 patients were analyzed. Pooled analysis from six studies (819 lesions in 802 patients) showed that before ablation, dysplasia was more commonly located in the right half versus the left half (odds ratio [OR] 4.3; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.33 - 7.93; P < 0.001). Pooled analysis from seven studies showed that dysplasia after ablation recurred in 101 /1432 patients (7.05 %; 95 %CI 5.7 % - 8.4 %). Recurrence of dysplasia was located more commonly at the TGF (n = 68) than in the tubular esophagus (n = 34; OR 5.33; 95 %CI 1.75 - 16.21; P = 0.003). Of the esophageal lesions, 90 % (27 /30) were visible, whereas only 46 % (23 /50) of the recurrent dysplastic lesions at the TGF were visible (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Before ablation, dysplasia in BE is found more frequently in the right half of the esophagus versus the left. Post-ablation recurrence is more commonly found in the TGF and is non-visible, compared with the tubular esophagus, which is mainly visible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shashank Garg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Jesse Xie
- Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Sumant Inamdar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Sheila L Thomas
- Education and Research Services, UAMS Library, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Arvind J Trindade
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Badgery H, Read M, Winter NN, Taylor ACF, Hii MW. The role of esophagectomy in the management of Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2020; 1481:72-89. [PMID: 32812261 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) has previously been a routine indication for esophagectomy. Recent advances in endoscopic therapy have resulted in a shift away from surgery. Current international guidelines recommend endoscopic therapy for BE with HGD irrespective of recurrence or progression of dysplasia. Current guidelines do not address the ongoing role of esophagectomy as an adjunct in the setting of failed endoscopic therapy. This review examines the role of esophagectomy as an adjunct to endoscopy in the management of patients with BE and HGD, with a specific focus on patients with persistent, progressive, or recurrent disease, disease resistant to endoscopic therapy, in patients with concomitant esophageal pathology, and in those patients in whom lifelong surveillance may not be possible or desired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Badgery
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew Read
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicole N Winter
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew C F Taylor
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael W Hii
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang KK. How I Treat Patients With Barrett Esophagus When Endoscopic Ablation Fails. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2020; 16:82-87. [PMID: 34035706 PMCID: PMC8132674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth K Wang
- Director, Esophageal Neoplasia Clinic Director, Barrett's Esophagus Unit Russ and Kathy Van Cleve Professor of Gastroenterology Research Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Singh T, Sanaka MR, Thota PN. Endoscopic therapy for Barrett’s esophagus and early esophageal cancer: Where do we go from here? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10:165-174. [PMID: 30283599 PMCID: PMC6162248 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i9.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Revised: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Since Barrett’s esophagus is a precancerous condition, efforts have been made for its eradication by various ablative techniques. Initially, laser ablation was attempted in non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus and subsequently, endoscopic ablation using photodynamic therapy was used in Barrett’s patients with high-grade dysplasia who were poor surgical candidates. Since then, various ablative therapies have been developed with radiofrequency ablation having the best quality of evidence. Resection of dysplastic areas only without complete removal of entire Barrett’s segment is associated with high risk of developing metachronous neoplasia. Hence, the current standard of management for Barrett’s esophagus includes endoscopic mucosal resection of visible abnormalities followed by ablation to eradicate remaining Barrett’s epithelium. Although endoscopic therapy cannot address regional lymph node metastases, such nodal involvement is present in only 1% to 2% of patients with intramucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett esophagus and therefore is useful in intramucosal cancers. Post ablation surveillance is recommended as recurrence of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia have been reported. This review includes a discussion of the technique, efficacy and complication rate of currently available ablation techniques such as radiofrequency ablation, cryotherapy, argon plasma coagulation and photodynamic therapy as well as endoscopic mucosal resection. A brief discussion of the emerging technique, endoscopic submucosal dissection is also included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tavankit Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Madhusudhan R Sanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| | - Prashanthi N Thota
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Komanduri S, Muthusamy VR, Wani S. Controversies in Endoscopic Eradication Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus. Gastroenterology 2018; 154:1861-1875.e1. [PMID: 29458152 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.12.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Revised: 11/05/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Advances in endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett's Esophagus-associated neoplasia have resulted in a significant paradigm shift in the diagnosis and management of this complex disease. A robust body of literature critically evaluating outcomes of resection and ablative strategies has allowed gastroenterologists to make quality, evidence-based decisions for their patients. Despite this progress, there are still many unanswered questions and challenges that remain. Ultimately, identification of a cost-effective screening modality, biomarkers for risk stratification, and strides to eliminate post surveillance endoscopy after endoscopic eradication therapy are essential to reach our long-term goal for eradication of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinadh Komanduri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Care of the Postablation Patient: Surveillance, Acid Suppression, and Treatment of Recurrence. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2017; 27:515-529. [PMID: 28577772 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2017.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic eradication therapy is effective and durable for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE), with low rates of recurrence of dysplasia but significant rates of recurrence of intestinal metaplasia. Identified risk factors for recurrence include age and length of BE before treatment and may also include presence of a large hiatal hernia, higher grade of dysplasia before treatment, and history of smoking. Current guidelines for surveillance following ablation are limited, with recommendations based on low-quality evidence and expert opinion. New modalities including optical coherence tomography and wide-area tissue sampling with computer-assisted analysis show promise as adjunctive surveillance modalities.
Collapse
|
9
|
Macías-García F, Domínguez-Muñoz JE. Update on management of Barrett's esophagus. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2016; 7:227-234. [PMID: 27158538 PMCID: PMC4848245 DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i2.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2015] [Revised: 10/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a common condition that develops as a consequence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The significance of Barrett's metaplasia is that predisposes to cancer development. This article provides a current evidence-based review for the management of BE and related early neoplasia. Controversial issues that impact the management of patients with BE, including definition, screening, clinical aspects, diagnosis, surveillance, and management of dysplasia and early cancer have been assessed.
Collapse
|
10
|
ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111:30-50; quiz 51. [PMID: 26526079 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 996] [Impact Index Per Article: 124.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2015] [Accepted: 08/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is among the most common conditions encountered by the gastroenterologist. In this document, the American College of Gastroenterology updates its guidance for the best practices in caring for these patients. These guidelines continue to endorse screening of high-risk patients for BE; however, routine screening is limited to men with reflux symptoms and multiple other risk factors. Acknowledging recent data on the low risk of malignant progression in patients with nondysplastic BE, endoscopic surveillance intervals are attenuated in this population; patients with nondysplastic BE should undergo endoscopic surveillance no more frequently than every 3-5 years. Neither routine use of biomarker panels nor advanced endoscopic imaging techniques (beyond high-definition endoscopy) is recommended at this time. Endoscopic ablative therapy is recommended for patients with BE and high-grade dysplasia, as well as T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma. Based on recent level 1 evidence, endoscopic ablative therapy is also recommended for patients with BE and low-grade dysplasia, although endoscopic surveillance continues to be an acceptable alternative. Given the relatively common recurrence of BE after ablation, we suggest postablation endoscopic surveillance intervals. Although many of the recommendations provided are based on weak evidence or expert opinion, this document provides a pragmatic framework for the care of the patient with BE.
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
The absolute incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has increased 7-fold over the past 5 decades, and esophageal adenocarcinoma is the most rapidly increasing epithelial malignancy in the United States. The incidence of early esophageal cancer has also increased proportionately. In the past decade, radiofrequency ablation has become the standard first-line therapy for high-grade dysplasia when found in the precursor lesion to esophageal adenocarcinoma, Barrett's esophagus. Success in the endoscopic management of high-grade dysplasia has furthered efforts to treat early esophageal cancers endoscopically. Although surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for more advanced tumors, national guidelines now recommend endoscopic mucosal resection followed by radiofrequency ablation for intramucosal carcinomas and T1a cancers. T1b cancers represent a more challenging group-very good results have been reported in highly selected subsets of patients with T1b tumors; however, many recommendations favor individualization or a surgical approach for this stage. This review examines the current data and recommendations regarding the endoscopic management of early esophageal adenocarcinomas.
Collapse
|
12
|
Small AJ, Sutherland SE, Hightower JS, Guarner-Argente C, Furth EE, Kochman ML, Forde KA, Bewtra M, Falk GW, Ginsberg GG. Comparative risk of recurrence of dysplasia and carcinoma after endoluminal eradication therapy of high-grade dysplasia versus intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81:1158-66.e1-4. [PMID: 25650071 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2014] [Accepted: 10/23/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic therapy is the preferred approach for the management of Barrett's esophagus (BE) patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and intramucosal carcinoma (IMC). Little is known about outcome differences in patients with HGD versus IMC. OBJECTIVE To determine and compare the rate of recurrent dysplasia or neoplasia in patients with HGD or IMC undergoing endoscopic therapy. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS A total of 246 BE patients with either HGD or IMC referred for endoscopic therapy. INTERVENTION Patients underwent EMR and/or ablation therapy with the goal of complete eradication of all dysplasia/neoplasia and intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM). Patients were assigned to either the HGD or IMC group based on highest pathology grade at the start of therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Complete eradication and recurrence of IM and/or HGD/neoplasia were assessed among patients with HGD versus IMC. Only patients with CE-IM (documented eradication of all dysplasia/neoplasia and IM on a single endoscopy) were included for analysis of recurrence rates and risk factors. RESULTS CE-IM was achieved in 113 of 135 patients (83.7%) with HGD and in 84 of 111 patients (75.7%) with IMC (P = .16). Overall recurrence rates of dysplasia or neoplasia after CE-IM were similar in both groups (HGD, 8.0% vs IMC, 9.5%; P = .44; relative risk, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-3.0) and remained similar in patients with 5 years of surveillance after CE-IM (HGD, 13.5% vs IMC, 11.4%; P = .53; relative risk, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-2.7). LIMITATIONS Retrospective, observational study and evolution of endoscopic modalities and experience. CONCLUSION Endoluminal therapy can successfully achieve eradication of IM and dysplasia or neoplasia in BE patients with HGD and IMC at comparable rates. There were no differences in the rates of recurrent HGD/IMC in the 2 groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Small
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Scott E Sutherland
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jessica S Hightower
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carlos Guarner-Argente
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital de Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Emma E Furth
- Department of Pathology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael L Kochman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Wilmott Center for Endoscopic Innovation, Research, and Training
| | - Kimberly A Forde
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Meenakshi Bewtra
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gary W Falk
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gregory G Ginsberg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bennett C, Moayyedi P, Corley DA, DeCaestecker J, Falck-Ytter Y, Falk G, Vakil N, Sanders S, Vieth M, Inadomi J, Aldulaimi D, Ho KY, Odze R, Meltzer SJ, Quigley E, Gittens S, Watson P, Zaninotto G, Iyer PG, Alexandre L, Ang Y, Callaghan J, Harrison R, Singh R, Bhandari P, Bisschops R, Geramizadeh B, Kaye P, Krishnadath S, Fennerty MB, Manner H, Nason KS, Pech O, Konda V, Ragunath K, Rahman I, Romero Y, Sampliner R, Siersema PD, Tack J, Tham TCK, Trudgill N, Weinberg DS, Wang J, Wang K, Wong JYY, Attwood S, Malfertheiner P, MacDonald D, Barr H, Ferguson MK, Jankowski J. BOB CAT: A Large-Scale Review and Delphi Consensus for Management of Barrett's Esophagus With No Dysplasia, Indefinite for, or Low-Grade Dysplasia. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110:662-82; quiz 683. [PMID: 25869390 PMCID: PMC4436697 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2014] [Accepted: 02/03/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a common premalignant lesion for which surveillance is recommended. This strategy is limited by considerable variations in clinical practice. We conducted an international, multidisciplinary, systematic search and evidence-based review of BE and provided consensus recommendations for clinical use in patients with nondysplastic, indefinite, and low-grade dysplasia (LGD). METHODS We defined the scope, proposed statements, and searched electronic databases, yielding 20,558 publications that were screened, selected online, and formed the evidence base. We used a Delphi consensus process, with an 80% agreement threshold, using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to categorize the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. RESULTS In total, 80% of respondents agreed with 55 of 127 statements in the final voting rounds. Population endoscopic screening is not recommended and screening should target only very high-risk cases of males aged over 60 years with chronic uncontrolled reflux. A new international definition of BE was agreed upon. For any degree of dysplasia, at least two specialist gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists are required. Risk factors for cancer include male gender, length of BE, and central obesity. Endoscopic resection should be used for visible, nodular areas. Surveillance is not recommended for <5 years of life expectancy. Management strategies for indefinite dysplasia (IND) and LGD were identified, including a de-escalation strategy for lower-risk patients and escalation to intervention with follow-up for higher-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS In this uniquely large consensus process in gastroenterology, we made key clinical recommendations for the escalation/de-escalation of BE in clinical practice. We made strong recommendations for the prioritization of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Bennett
- Centre for Technology Enabled Health Research, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | | | | | | | - Yngve Falck-Ytter
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Case and VA Medical Center Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Gary Falk
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nimish Vakil
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | | | - John Inadomi
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Khek-Yu Ho
- National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Robert Odze
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Eamonn Quigley
- Weill Cornell Medical College and Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Leo Alexandre
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Yeng Ang
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - James Callaghan
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Rajvinder Singh
- Lyell McEwin Hospital/University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | | | - Bita Geramizadeh
- Department of Pathology, Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Philip Kaye
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sheila Krishnadath
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Research Group, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hendrik Manner
- Department of Gastroenterology HSK Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Katie S Nason
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Oliver Pech
- Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brueder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Vani Konda
- University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Krish Ragunath
- Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Jan Tack
- University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Nigel Trudgill
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, West Bromwich, UK
| | | | - Jean Wang
- Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Jennie Y Y Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - David MacDonald
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hugh Barr
- Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK
| | | | - Janusz Jankowski
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire and University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Blevins CH, Iyer PG. Endoscopic therapy for Barrett's oesophagus. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 29:167-77. [PMID: 25743464 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2014] [Accepted: 11/24/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is thought to progress through the development of dysplasia (low grade and high grade) to oesophageal adenocarcinoma, a lethal cancer with poor survival. The overall goal of endoscopic therapy of BO is to eliminate metaplastic and dysplastic epithelium, to prevent and/or reduce the risk of progression to OAC. Endoscopic therapy techniques can be divided into two broad complementary techniques: tissue acquiring (endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection) and ablative. Endoscopic therapy has been established as safe and effective for the subjects with intra-mucosal cancer (IMC), high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and more recently in treating low-grade dysplasia (LGD). Challenges to endoscopic therapy are being recognized, such as incomplete response and recurrence. While eradication of intestinal metaplasia is the immediate goal of endoscopic therapy, surveillance must continue after complete elimination of intestinal metaplasia, to detect and treat recurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Prasad G Iyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Milashka M, Calomme A, Van Laethem JL, Blero D, Eisendrath P, Le Moine O, Devière J. Sixteen-year follow-up of Barrett's esophagus, endoscopically treated with argon plasma coagulation. United European Gastroenterol J 2014; 2:367-73. [PMID: 25360314 DOI: 10.1177/2050640614549095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2014] [Accepted: 07/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The thermal destruction of non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE) and its replacement by squamous epithelium is an attractive, but unproven strategy to avoid further development of dysplasia or cancer. The goal of this study was to estimate the persistence of restoration of squamous epithelium and the risk of cancer in BE that was eradicated using argon plasma coagulation (APC) in the absence of high-grade dysplasia, 16 years after its application. DESIGN We followed 32 patients with BE who underwent eradication of metaplastic epithelium using APC, up to 16 years later. RESULTS At the end of the initial treatment, 25 of 32 patients (78%) had complete endoscopic eradication, there was partial squamous re-epithelialization in four patients (13%) and it was absent in three patients (9%). We observed buried metaplastic glands under new squamous epithelium in 6 of the 25 patients who had complete endoscopic eradication. At follow-up, sustained complete endoscopic eradication was observed in 16 of 32 patients (50%), partial eradication in 11 of 32 patients (35%); there were two patients (6%) lost to follow-up and three patients (9%) developed esophageal adenocarcinoma. Two of the latest cases arose from the buried glands under neosquamous epithelium after complete eradication and one arose from a small remaining Barrett's segment. CONCLUSIONS We observed long-term re-epithelialization in the majority of patients who had previously had complete eradication of Barrett's esophagus. This did not provide protection against cancer development, as the incidence of cancers arising from buried glands or from residual Barrett's esophagus was similar to that observed in patients undergoing no specific treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Milashka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, ERASME Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Annabelle Calomme
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, ERASME Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean Luc Van Laethem
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, ERASME Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Daniel Blero
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, ERASME Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre Eisendrath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, ERASME Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olivier Le Moine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, ERASME Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jacques Devière
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, ERASME Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Anaparthy R, Sharma P. Progression of Barrett oesophagus: role of endoscopic and histological predictors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 11:525-34. [PMID: 24860927 DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Barrett oesophagus is an important precursor lesion for the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is the modality most widely used to visualize and biopsy the oesophagus to establish a diagnosis. Additional clues are available at the time of endoscopy that can identify high-risk features known to increase the risk of progression to OAC, such as the length of the Barrett oesophagus segment, length of hiatal hernia and the presence of nodularity or visible endoscopic lesions in this segment. Until molecular biomarkers are identified and validated as adjunctive tools for risk stratification, knowledge of endoscopic features could complement dysplasia grading for risk stratification of patients with Barrett oesophagus and identify subgroups at risk of progression to OAC. This approach would, in turn, facilitate more rational tailoring of endoscopic surveillance. This Review summarizes the current role of endoscopic and histological factors involved in neoplastic progression of Barrett oesophagus to OAC, and provides an overview of the risk-prediction models that have utilized endoscopic and histological factors for risk stratification in patients with Barrett oesophagus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajeswari Anaparthy
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO 64128, USA
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO 64128, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Incidence and predictors of adenocarcinoma following endoscopic ablation of Barrett's esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59:1560-6. [PMID: 24395382 PMCID: PMC4071117 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-3002-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2013] [Accepted: 12/14/2013] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rate and risk factors of recurrent or metachronous adenocarcinoma following endoscopic ablation therapy in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) have not been specifically reported. AIM The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and predictors of adenocarcinoma after ablation therapy for BE high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC). METHODS This is a single center, retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive cases of endoscopic ablation for BE. A total of 223 patients with BE (HGD or IMC) were treated by ablation between 1996 and 2011. Primary outcome measures were recurrence and new development of adenocarcinoma after ablation. Recurrence was defined as the presence of adenocarcinoma following the absence of adenocarcinoma in biopsy samples from two consecutive surveillance endoscopies. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of adenocarcinoma after ablation. RESULTS One hundred and eighty-three patients were included in the final analysis, and 40 patients were excluded: 22 for palliative ablation, eight lost to follow-up, five for residual carcinoma and five for postoperative state. Median follow-up was 39 months. Recurrence or new development of adenocarcinoma was found in 20 patients (11 %) and the median time to recurrence/development of adenocarcinoma was 11.5 months. Independent predictors of recurrent or metachronous adenocarcinoma were hiatal hernia size ≥ 4 cm (odds ratio 3.649, P = 0.0233) and histology (HGD/adenocarcinoma) after first ablation (odds ratio 4.141, P = 0.0065). CONCLUSIONS Adenocarcinoma after endoscopic therapy for HGD or IMC in BE is associated with large hiatal hernia and histology status after initial ablation therapy.
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
The management of Barrett's oesophagus and associated neoplasia has evolved considerably in recent years. Modern endoscopic strategies including endoscopic resection and mucosal ablation can eradicate dysplastic Barrett's and prevent progression to invasive oesophageal cancer. However, several aspects of Barrett's management remain controversial including the stage in the disease process at which to intervene, and the choice of endoscopic or surgical therapy. A review of articles pertaining to the management of Barrett's oesophagus with or without associated neoplasia, was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched to identify literature relevant to eight pre-defined areas of clinical controversy. The following search terms were used: Barrett's oesophagus; dysplasia; intramucosal carcinoma; endotherapy; endoscopic resection; ablation; oesophagectomy. A significant body of evidence exists to support early endoscopic therapy for high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Although not supported by randomised controlled trial evidence, endoscopic therapy is now favoured ahead of oesophagectomy for most patients with HGD. Focal intramucosal (T1a) carcinomas can be managed effectively using endoscopic and surgical therapy, however surgery should be considered the first line therapy where there is submucosal invasion (T1b). Treatment of low grade dysplasia is not supported at present due to widespread over-reporting of the disease. The role of surveillance endoscopy in non-dysplastic Barrett's remains controversial.
Collapse
|
19
|
Hunt BM, Louie BE, Dunst CM, Lipham JC, Farivar AS, Sharata A, Aye RW. Esophagectomy for failed endoscopic therapy in patients with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus 2013; 27:362-7. [PMID: 23795720 DOI: 10.1111/dote.12096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic therapy (ablation +/- endoscopic resection) for high-grade dysplasia and/or intramucosal carcinoma (IMC) of the esophagus has demonstrated promising results. However, there is a concern that a curable, local disease may progress to systemic disease with repeated endotherapy. We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent esophagectomy after endotherapy at three tertiary care esophageal centers from 2006 to 2012. Our objective was to document the clinical and pathologic outcomes of patients who undergo esophagectomy after failed endotherapy. Fifteen patients underwent esophagectomy after a mean of 13 months and 4.1 sessions of endotherapy for progression of disease (53%), failure to clear disease (33%), or recurrence (13%). Initially, all had Barrett's, 73% had ≥3-cm segments, 93% had a nodule or ulcer, and 91% had multifocal disease upon presentation. High-grade dysplasia was present at index endoscopy in 80% and IMC in 33%, and some patients had both. Final pathology at esophagectomy was T0 (13%), T1a (60%), T1b (20%), and T2 (7%). Positive lymph nodes were found in 20%: one patient was T2N1 and two were T1bN1. Patients with T1b, T2, or N1 disease had more IMC on index endoscopy (75% vs. 18%) and more endotherapy sessions (median 6.5 vs. 3). There have been no recurrences a mean of 20 months after esophagectomy. Clinical outcomes were comparable to other series, but submucosal invasion (27%) and node-positive disease (20%) were encountered in some patients who initially presented with a locally curable disease and eventually required esophagectomy after failed endotherapy. An initial pathology of IMC or failure to clear disease after three treatments should raise concern for loco-regional progression and prompt earlier consideration of esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B M Hunt
- Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wang KK. Ablation is in the eye of the beholder. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11:643-4. [PMID: 23524127 PMCID: PMC3815674 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2012] [Revised: 02/21/2013] [Accepted: 02/22/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth K. Wang
- Barrett’s Esophagus Unit Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shishkova N, Kuznetsova O, Berezov T. Photodynamic Therapy in Gastroenterology. J Gastrointest Cancer 2013; 44:251-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s12029-013-9496-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
22
|
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is an acquired condition characterized by replacement of stratified squamous epithelium by a cancer predisposing metaplastic columnar epithelium. Endoscopy with systemic biopsy protocols plays a vital role in diagnosis. Technological advancements in dysplasia detection improves outcomes in surveillance and treatment of patients with BE and dysplasia. These advances in endoscopic technology radically changed the treatment for dysplastic BE and early cancer from being surgical to organ-sparing endoscopic therapy. A multimodal treatment approach combining endoscopic resection of visible and/or raised lesions with ablation techniques for flat BE mucosa, followed by long-term surveillance improves the outcomes of BE. Safe and effective endoscopic treatment can be either tissue acquiring as in endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection or tissue ablative as with photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy. Debatable issues such as durability of response, recognition and management of sub-squamous BE and optimal management strategy in patients with low-grade dysplasia and non-dysplastic BE need to be studied further. Development of safer wide field resection techniques, which would effectively remove all BE and obviate the need for long-term surveillance, is another research goal. Shared decision making between the patient and physician is important while considering treatment for dysplasia in BE.
Collapse
|
23
|
Hunt BM, Louie BE, Schembre DB, Bohorfoush AG, Farivar AS, Aye RW. Outcomes in patients who have failed endoscopic therapy for dysplastic Barrett's metaplasia or early esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 95:1734-40. [PMID: 23561804 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2012] [Revised: 12/17/2012] [Accepted: 02/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic therapy (ablation ± mucosal resection) for esophageal high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal carcinoma has demonstrated promising results. Little is known about patients who have persistent or progressive disease despite endotherapy. We compared patients who had successful eradication of their disease with those in whom endotherapy failed to try to identify factors predictive of failure and outcomes after salvage therapy. METHODS We performed a single-institution retrospective review of patients treated with endotherapy from 2007 to 2012. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients underwent endotherapy: 28 had successful eradication of their disease and endotherapy failed in 10 patients. Patients in whom endotherapy failed were more likely to have high-grade dysplasia (HGD) on initial endoscopy, nodules or ulcers, multifocal dysplasia, and persistent nondysplastic Barrett's metaplasia. Patients in whom endotherapy failed also underwent significantly more endotherapy sessions. Seven patients had persistent dysplasia or progression to cancer, and 3 patients had complete eradication of HGD but presented with intramucosal carcinoma an average of 15 months after eradication. The 10 patients in whom endotherapy failed underwent salvage therapy with esophagectomy (7 patients), definitive chemoradiotherapy (1 patient), and endotherapy (2 patients). Patients treated with esophagectomy were disease free at a mean of 25 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS HGD on initial endoscopy, multifocal dysplasia, mucosal abnormalities, and failure to eradicate nondysplastic Barrett's metaplasia were associated with failure of endotherapy. Patients with these characteristics should be considered at higher risk for treatment failure, and earlier consideration should be given to esophagectomy if there is persistent, progressive, or recurrent neoplasia. Clinical outcomes are good, even after salvage therapy. Continued endoscopic surveillance is mandatory after successful endotherapy because of the risk of recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben M Hunt
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute and Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Choi JC, Kim GH, Park DY, Seoung HG, Lee YJ, Kim JH, Kim TK, I H. A submucosal tumor-like recurrence of early esophageal cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Clin Endosc 2013; 46:182-5. [PMID: 23614130 PMCID: PMC3630314 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.2.182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2012] [Revised: 04/03/2012] [Accepted: 05/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Early esophageal cancer is defined as a tumor invading the mucosa with or without lymph node or distant organ metastasis. In the current guidelines for early esophageal cancer, absolute indication for endoscopic resection include lesions limited to the epithelium or lamina propria mucosa not exceeding two-thirds of the circumference, and relative indications include lesions limited to the muscularis mucosa or the upper third of the submucosal layer and not accompanied by clinical evidence of lymph node metastasis. After endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer, locally recurrent cancer can occur, especially in the case of incomplete resection. Here, we report a rare case of a submucosal tumor-like recurrence after endoscopic resection of early esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Cheon Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Gwang Ha Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Do Youn Park
- Department of Pathology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Hyeog Gyu Seoung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Yong Jae Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Ji Hye Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Tae Kyun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Hoseok I
- Department of Chest Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Leggett CL, Gorospe EC, Wang KK. Endoscopic therapy for Barrett's esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2013; 42:175-85. [PMID: 23452637 PMCID: PMC3815664 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2012.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic therapy for Barrett's esophagus is feasible and likely to decrease the future risk of development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The most commonly used therapy is radiofrequency ablation, which has been shown to produce reproducible superficial injury in the esophagus. Other thermal therapies include multipolar coagulation, argon plasma coagulation, and thermal laser therapy. The other end of the ablative spectrum includes cryotherapy, which involves freezing tissue to produce mucosal necrosis. Photodynamic therapy has been used to photochemically eliminate abnormal mucosa. Endoscopic therapy has been demonstrated to be effective in high-risk situations such as Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cadman L Leggett
- Barrett's Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Long-term outcomes of patients with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia or early cancer treated with endoluminal therapies with intention to complete eradication. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77:190-9. [PMID: 23317687 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2012] [Accepted: 10/08/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoluminal therapy is an option for selected patients with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia or early cancer. OBJECTIVE To assess long-term outcomes of patients treated with endoluminal therapy with the goal of complete eradication of all dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS Selected patients referred with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. INTERVENTION Endoluminal therapy combining resection and photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation, and/or argon plasma coagulation treatment was individualized based on patient and lesion characteristics, technique evolution, and interval response. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS We assessed complete eradication of dysplasia, all intestinal metaplasia, and recurrences. RESULTS A total of 166 patients were treated and had at least 1 year of follow-up. Complete elimination of neoplasia was achieved in 157 patients (95%) and complete elimination of intestinal metaplasia in 137 patients (83%). After therapy, patients were followed for 33 (range 18-58) months. Among patients who achieved complete elimination of intestinal metaplasia, subsequent recurrent intestinal metaplasia was detected in 48 (35%) and dysplasia in 12 (9%). Among those who achieved only complete elimination of dysplasia, recurrent dysplasia was detected in 6 of 19 patients (32%). Multifocal dysplasia and patient's age were dysplasia and/or carcinoma recurrence risk factors in the multivariable and univariable analyses. Complete elimination of intestinal metaplasia was a protective factor in the univariable analysis. Retreatment achieved remission in 90% of cases. Forty-two patients (23.9%) had complications, including 21 with stricture (11.9%) and 1 treatment-related death. LIMITATIONS Retrospective study and evolution of endoscopic modalities. CONCLUSION Multiple-mode endoluminal therapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia or early cancer with intention to complete eradication of all intestinal metaplasia was successful, with low observed recurrence of dysplasia or cancer. However, recurrence of intestinal metaplasia occurs in one-third of cases and supports continued endoscopic surveillance even after complete eradication.
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
The need to combat the rising incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma with its dismal prognosis has led to increasing development of many endoscopic treatments for Barrett's esophagus (BE). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been shown to be a safe and effective endoscopic treatment modality for dysplastic BE. The durability of successful eradication of dysplastic BE has been reported by earlier studies with limited sample size, follow-up time, and inadequate cohort of patients with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer. In this issue, Orman and colleagues present their findings from their single center, retrospective cohort of patients who underwent RFA with post-treatment surveillance. They report a low recurrence rate of 5.2% per year. There were no clinical characteristics found to be associated with BE recurrence in terms of length of segment or degree of dysplasia. Complete eradication of dysplasia (CE-D) or intestinal metaplasia was determined after a single post-RFA endoscopic examination with biopsies. This is an area of controversy as previous studies have used a minimum of two negative examinations before CE can be claimed. There are also limitations from sampling error during surveillance biopsies and the loss of a third of all post-RFA patients during surveillance. Multicenter, prospective studies with adequate follow-up are still needed before we can draw recommendations when to adequately cease post-treatment surveillance and to identify patients with increased risk of either recurrence or progression.
Collapse
|
28
|
Nelsen EM, Hawes RH, Iyer PG. Diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus. THE SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA 2012. [PMID: 23026274 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2012.07.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Barrett esophagus is characterized by the replacement of squamous mucosa in the esophagus by specialized intestinal metaplasia. Its clinical significance lies in it being the strongest risk factor for and known precursor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Diagnosis requires endoscopic confirmation of columnar metaplasia in the distal esophagus and histologic confirmation of specialized intestinal metaplasia. Recommendations for the management of subjects diagnosed with Barrett esophagus include periodic endoscopic surveillance to detect the development of high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Careful endoscopic evaluation with high-resolution endoscopy and endoscopic resection is recommended in the evaluation of subjects with high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric M Nelsen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Barrett esophagus is characterized by the replacement of squamous mucosa in the esophagus by specialized intestinal metaplasia. Its clinical significance lies in it being the strongest risk factor for and known precursor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Diagnosis requires endoscopic confirmation of columnar metaplasia in the distal esophagus and histologic confirmation of specialized intestinal metaplasia. Recommendations for the management of subjects diagnosed with Barrett esophagus include periodic endoscopic surveillance to detect the development of high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Careful endoscopic evaluation with high-resolution endoscopy and endoscopic resection is recommended in the evaluation of subjects with high-grade dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
30
|
Epidemiological investigation of Barrett's esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in Northwest China. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s1000-1948(12)60019-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
31
|
BENNETT CATHY, VAKIL NIMISH, BERGMAN JACQUES, HARRISON REBECCA, ODZE ROBERT, VIETH MICHAEL, SANDERS SCOTT, GAY LAURA, PECH OLIVER, LONGCROFT–WHEATON GAIUS, ROMERO YVONNE, INADOMI JOHN, TACK JAN, CORLEY DOUGLASA, MANNER HENDRIK, GREEN SUSI, DULAIMI DAVIDAL, ALI HAYTHEM, ALLUM BILL, ANDERSON MARK, CURTIS HOWARD, FALK GARY, FENNERTY MBRIAN, FULLARTON GRANT, KRISHNADATH KAUSILIA, MELTZER STEPHENJ, ARMSTRONG DAVID, GANZ ROBERT, CENGIA GIANPAOLO, GOING JAMESJ, GOLDBLUM JOHN, GORDON CHARLES, GRABSCH HEIKE, HAIGH CHRIS, HONGO MICHIO, JOHNSTON DAVID, FORBES–YOUNG RICKY, KAY ELAINE, KAYE PHILIP, LERUT TONI, LOVAT LAURENCEB, LUNDELL LARS, MAIRS PHILIP, SHIMODA TADAKUZA, SPECHLER STUART, SONTAG STEPHEN, MALFERTHEINER PETER, MURRAY IAIN, NANJI MANOJ, POLLER DAVID, RAGUNATH KRISH, REGULA JAROSLAW, CESTARI RENZO, SHEPHERD NEIL, SINGH RAJVINDER, STEIN HUBERTJ, TALLEY NICHOLASJ, GALMICHE JEAN, THAM TONYCK, WATSON PETER, YERIAN LISA, RUGGE MASSIMO, RICE THOMASW, HART JOHN, GITTENS STUART, HEWIN DAVID, HOCHBERGER JUERGEN, KAHRILAS PETER, PRESTON SEAN, SAMPLINER RICHARD, SHARMA PRATEEK, STUART ROBERT, WANG KENNETH, WAXMAN IRVING, ABLEY CHRIS, LOFT DUNCAN, PENMAN IAN, SHAHEEN NICHOLASJ, CHAK AMITABH, DAVIES GARETH, DUNN LORNA, FALCK–YTTER YNGVE, DECAESTECKER JOHN, BHANDARI PRADEEP, ELL CHRISTIAN, GRIFFIN SMICHAEL, ATTWOOD STEPHEN, BARR HUGH, ALLEN JOHN, FERGUSON MARKK, MOAYYEDI PAUL, JANKOWSKI JANUSZAZ. Consensus statements for management of Barrett's dysplasia and early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, based on a Delphi process. Gastroenterology 2012; 143:336-46. [PMID: 22537613 PMCID: PMC5538857 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 271] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2011] [Revised: 03/26/2012] [Accepted: 04/06/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) is increasingly common among patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). We aimed to provide consensus recommendations based on the medical literature that clinicians could use to manage patients with BE and low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or early-stage EA. METHODS We performed an international, multidisciplinary, systematic, evidence-based review of different management strategies for patients with BE and dysplasia or early-stage EA. We used a Delphi process to develop consensus statements. The results of literature searches were screened using a unique, interactive, Web-based data-sifting platform; we used 11,904 papers to inform the choice of statements selected. An a priori threshold of 80% agreement was used to establish consensus for each statement. RESULTS Eighty-one of the 91 statements achieved consensus despite generally low quality of evidence, including 8 clinical statements: (1) specimens from endoscopic resection are better than biopsies for staging lesions, (2) it is important to carefully map the size of the dysplastic areas, (3) patients that receive ablative or surgical therapy require endoscopic follow-up, (4) high-resolution endoscopy is necessary for accurate diagnosis, (5) endoscopic therapy for HGD is preferred to surveillance, (6) endoscopic therapy for HGD is preferred to surgery, (7) the combination of endoscopic resection and radiofrequency ablation is the most effective therapy, and (8) after endoscopic removal of lesions from patients with HGD, all areas of BE should be ablated. CONCLUSIONS We developed a data-sifting platform and used the Delphi process to create evidence-based consensus statements for the management of patients with BE and early-stage EA. This approach identified important clinical features of the diseases and areas for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - NIMISH VAKIL
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | | | - ROBERT ODZE
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - LAURA GAY
- Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - JAN TACK
- Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - SUSI GREEN
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | | | - HAYTHEM ALI
- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS trust, Maidstone, UK
| | | | - MARK ANDERSON
- City Hospital, Birmingham, UK and Sandwell Hospital, West Midlands, UK
| | | | - GARY FALK
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | - ROBERT GANZ
- Bloomington Medical Centre, Bloomington, Minnesota
| | | | | | - JOHN GOLDBLUM
- Anatomic Pathology, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - PHILIP KAYE
- Digestive Diseases Centre, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - LARS LUNDELL
- Karolinska Institutet, CLINTEC, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - KRISH RAGUNATH
- Digestive Diseases Centre, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - NEIL SHEPHERD
- Gloucestershire Royal Hospitals, Gloucestershire, UK
| | - RAJVINDER SINGH
- Lyell McEwin Hosptial, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | - JEAN–PAUL GALMICHE
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU and University of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | | | | | - LISA YERIAN
- Anatomic Pathology, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - THOMAS W. RICE
- Anatomic Pathology, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - JOHN HART
- University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - STUART GITTENS
- ECD Solutions, PO Box 862, Bridgetown, St. Michael, Barbados
| | - DAVID HEWIN
- Gloucestershire Royal Hospitals, Gloucestershire, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - PRATEEK SHARMA
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas
| | | | | | | | - CHRIS ABLEY
- University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | | | - NICHOLAS J. SHAHEEN
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - AMITABH CHAK
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - LORNA DUNN
- Northern Oesophagogastric Cancer Unit Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - S. MICHAEL GRIFFIN
- Northern Oesophagogastric Cancer Unit Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - HUGH BARR
- Gloucestershire Royal Hospitals, Gloucestershire, UK
| | - JOHN ALLEN
- University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | | | - JANUSZ A. Z. JANKOWSKI
- University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK,Queen Mary University London, London, UK,University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Caillol F, Bories E, Pesenti C, Poizat F, Monges G, Guiramand J, Esterni B, Giovannini M. Radiofrequency ablation associated to mucosal resection in the oesophagus: experience in a single centre. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2012; 36:371-7. [PMID: 22361442 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2012.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2011] [Revised: 11/07/2011] [Accepted: 01/02/2012] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Endoscopic resection (EMR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) form part of the treatment of Barrett's oesophagus (BO), dysplasia, superficial adenocarcinoma (OAC) associated with BO. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between June 2008 and April 2011, 34 patients underwent treatment with RFA (HALO system(®)), in a tertiary centre. For the study, patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 (16 patients of average 60 years old; 14 men, two women) received EMR and RFA. Group 2 (18 patients averaging 59 years age; 14 men, four women) received RFA without EMR in the year preceding the RFA. RESULTS In group 1, high grade dysplasia (HGD) was eradicated in 12 cases (92%), low grade dysplasia (LGD) in three cases (100%). Complete response occurred in nine cases (56%), partial response in 100% of cases. Mean follow-up was 15 months. In group 2, HGD was eradicated in one patient (100%), LGD in three patients (64%). A complete response was achieved in eight patients, partial response in four cases (77%). Mean follow-up was 10 months. The complication rate for groups 1 and 2 was of 18% and 10% respectively. No complication prevented completion of treatment or continued monitoring. Recurrence was evaluated to 5% in both groups. CONCLUSION RFA associated with EMR is feasible, offering probably better results and a very important advantage: a more complete histology before follow-up. Our results show effective treatment of BO and associated dysplasia with a low rate of complication. Nevertheless, when new techniques of BO ablation are used, the need to obtain histology before treatment should not be forgotten.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Caillol
- Endoscopy unit, Paoli Calmette institute, 232, boulevard Ste-Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
High-grade dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: the role of endoscopic eradication therapy. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2012; 28:354-61. [PMID: 22450896 PMCID: PMC4389732 DOI: 10.1097/mog.0b013e328352b78a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Endoscopic eradication therapy is considered a well tolerated and effective alternative to esophagectomy for a select patient population with high-grade Barrett's esophagus and intramucosal adenocarcinoma. This review highlights the available eradication techniques (resection and ablation) with emphasis on factors that influence the choice of therapy. RECENT FINDINGS Long-term follow-up of patients treated with endoscopic eradication therapies demonstrates high rates of complete remission of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia with overall survival comparable to patients treated surgically. Cohort studies also report that recurrence following successful ablation occurs in a significant proportion of patients, making careful surveillance an indispensable component following successful endoscopic therapy. Endoscopic eradication therapy is also effective for the treatment of recurrent dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia. Ablative therapies may lead to buried metaplasia in a small proportion of patients. The long-term clinical implications of buried metaplasia are unclear. SUMMARY Patients undergoing endoscopic eradication therapy should be enrolled in a comprehensive surveillance and staging program that offers both resection and ablative techniques. Complete remission of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia can be achieved in the vast majority of patients undergoing endoscopic therapy. Surveillance should continue after treatment with close monitoring for recurrent dysplasia.
Collapse
|
34
|
Garman KS, Orlando RC, Chen X. Review: Experimental models for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2012; 302:G1231-43. [PMID: 22421618 PMCID: PMC4380479 DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00509.2011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Several different cell culture systems and laboratory animal models have been used over the years to study Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Most of the existing models have key differences with the human esophagus and complex pathogenesis of disease. None of the models offers an ideal system for the complex study of environmental exposure, genetic risk, and prevention strategies. In fact, different model systems may be required to answer different specific research questions about the pathogenesis of BE and EAC. Given the high mortality associated with EAC and the fact that current screening strategies miss most cases of EAC, advances in basic and translational science related to esophageal injury, repair, and carcinogenesis are clearly needed. This review describes several of the existing and potential model systems for BE and EAC with their benefits and disadvantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine S. Garman
- 1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham;
| | - Roy C. Orlando
- 2Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; and
| | - Xiaoxin Chen
- 3Cancer Research Program, Julius L. Chambers Biomedical Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Komanduri S. Endoscopic therapies for Barrett's-associated dysplasia: a new paradigm for a new decade. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 6:291-300. [PMID: 22646252 DOI: 10.1586/egh.12.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The emergence of endoscopic therapies for Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated dysplasia has significantly altered the management of this complex disease. Over the past decade, there has been a paradigm shift from that of pure surveillance to a more therapeutic approach in eradicating dysplastic BE. This strategy includes less invasive options than esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and early eradication of confirmed low-grade dysplasia. Although multiple modalities exist for endoscopic therapy, endoscopic mucosal resection coupled with radiofrequency ablation appears to be the most effective therapy, with minimal complications. Recent advances in endoscopic eradication therapies for dysplastic BE have fueled excitement for a significant weapon against the rising incidence of esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sri Komanduri
- Division of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wang KK, Tian JM, Gorospe E, Penfield J, Prasad G, Goddard T, Wongkeesong M, Buttar NS, Lutzke L, Krishnadath S. Medical and endoscopic management of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Dis Esophagus 2012; 25:349-55. [PMID: 22409514 PMCID: PMC4134126 DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01342.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The management of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus has clearly changed over recent years. The risk of cancer development is still substantial, with about one in three patients developing cancer, but a number of patients do not develop cancer. The nature of high-grade dysplasia has also been genetically elucidated with more evidence of chromosomal instability being present at this stage than previously thought. Therapy of the condition has evolved more toward endoscopic therapy, given the good results of radio-frequency ablation and photodynamic therapy in eliminating dysplasia and decreasing cancer development in randomized controlled trial. The best candidates for treatment include compliant patients that have relatively short segments of Barrett's esophagus, an anatomically straight segment, lack of nodularity, and an intact p16. However, even with excellent long-term results similar to surgical resection, the risk of recurrence is present in over 14% of patients, which indicates that there will be a need to continue surveillance endoscopy in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K K Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55934, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus has gained increased clinical attention because of its association with esophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer with increasing incidence and poor survival rates. The goals of ablating Barrett's esophagus are to decrease esophageal cancer rates and to improve overall survival and quality of life. Different techniques have been developed and tested for their effectiveness eradicating Barrett's epithelium. This review assesses the literature associated with different ablative techniques. The safety and efficacy of different techniques are discussed. This review concludes with recommendations for the clinician, including specific strategies for patient care decisions for patients with Barrett's esophagus with varying degrees of dysplasia.
Collapse
|
38
|
Galey KM, Wilshire CL, Watson TJ, Schneider MD, Kaul V, Jones CE, Litle VR, Ullah A, Peters JH. Endoscopic management of early esophageal neoplasia: an emerging standard. J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15:1728-35. [PMID: 21811883 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1618-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2011] [Accepted: 07/12/2011] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and ablation technologies have markedly changed the treatment of early esophageal neoplasia. We analyzed treatment and outcomes of patients undergoing multimodal endoscopic treatment of early esophageal neoplasia at our institution. METHODS Records of patients undergoing endoscopic treatment for esophageal low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN, n = 11), high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN, n = 24), or T1N0M0 neoplasia (n = 10), presenting between 2007 and 2009, were reviewed. Outcomes included eradication of neoplasia/intestinal metaplasia, development of metachronous neoplasia, and progression to surgical resection. RESULTS There were 45 patients, 96% male, with a mean age 67 years. The degree of neoplasia prior to intervention was intramucosal (8) or submucosal (2) carcinoma in 10, HGIN in 24, and LGIN in 11. Patients underwent a total of 166 procedures (median 3/patient, range 1-9). These included 120 radiofrequency ablation sessions, 38 EMRs, and 8 cryoablations. Mean follow-up was 21.3 months. Neoplasia and intestinal metaplasia were eradicated in 87.2% and 56.4% of patients, respectively, while 15.4% developed metachronous neoplasia. Three patients underwent esophagectomy. No patient developed unresectable disease or died. CONCLUSION Endoscopic treatment of early esophageal neoplasia is safe and effective in the short term. A minority of treated patients developed recurrent neoplasia, which is usually amenable to further endoscopic therapy. Complications are relatively minor and uncommon. Endoscopic therapy as the initial treatment for early esophageal neoplasia is an emerging standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly M Galey
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Endoscopy has a vital role in the diagnosis, screening, surveillance and treatment of Barrett esophagus. Over the past few decades, tremendous advances have been made in endoscopic technology, and the management of dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett esophagus has changed radically from being surgical to organ-sparing endoscopic therapy. Proper endoscopic techniques and systematic biopsy protocols improve dysplasia detection, and endoscopic surveillance improves outcomes in patients with Barrett esophagus and dysplasia. Endoscopic treatment can be tissue acquiring (as in endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection) or ablative (as with photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy). Treatment is usually multimodal, combining endoscopic resection of visible lesions with one or more mucosal ablation techniques, followed by long-term surveillance. Such treatment is safe and effective. Shared decision-making between the patient and physician is important while considering treatment for dysplasia in Barrett esophagus. Issues such as durability of response, importance of subsquamous Barrett epithelium and the optimal management strategy in patients with low-grade dysplasia and nondysplastic Barrett esophagus need to be studied further. Development of safer wide-field resection techniques, which would effectively remove all Barrett esophagus and obviate the need for long-term surveillance, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aparna Repaka
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Wearn 247, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Patti MG, Herbella FAM. Role of minimally invasive surgery in the modern treatment of Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2011; 21:135-44. [PMID: 21112503 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a highly prevalent disease. Population studies have demonstrated that a significant proportion of individuals weekly experience GERD symptoms. Barrett's esophagus (BE), defined by the presence of intestinal metaplasia (columnar epithelium with goblet cells), is considered a consequence of chronic reflux. This review defines the role of surgery in the modern treatment of BE, taking into consideration the pathophysiology of the disease and the new endoscopic procedures available at present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco G Patti
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Room G-201, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a photochemical process that uses a photosensitizer drug activated by laser light to produce mucosal ablation. Porfimer sodium PDT has proved long-term efficacy and durability in the treatment of Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia and early esophageal adenocarcinoma. Its use has been limited by serious side effects including prolonged cutaneous photosensitivity and stricture formation. Other photosensitizers with a better safety profile have been used mostly in Europe with limited experience. The future of PDT lies on a better understanding of dosimetry, tissue properties, and host genetic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta L Davila
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1466, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Peters JH. Progress in outlining the frequency and risk of recurrent neoplasia after ablation of Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71:704-5. [PMID: 20363412 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2009] [Accepted: 12/16/2009] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
43
|
Hernandez LV, Eisen GM. Cryotherapy for the prevention and treatment of esophageal cancer: when does efficacy equal success? Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71:694-6. [PMID: 20363411 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2010] [Accepted: 02/17/2010] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
|