Evaluating the "weekend effect" on patient outcomes in upper GI bleeding

Effect of holiday admission on clinical outcome of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A real-world report from Thailand

Background

Holiday admissions are associated with poorer clinical outcomes compared with non-holiday admissions. However, data remain inconsistent concerning the “holiday effect” for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. This study compared the differences between clinical courses of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding who were admitted on holidays and non-holidays in Thailand.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding confirmed by endoscopy who were admitted on holidays and non-holidays between January 2016 and December 2017. Mortality, medical resource usage, time to endoscopy, and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups.

Results

In total, 132 and 190 patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were admitted on holidays and non-holidays, respectively. Baseline characteristics, diagnosis of variceal bleeding, and pre-and post-endoscopic scores were not different between the two groups. Patients admitted on non-holidays were more likely to undergo early endoscopy, within 24 h of hospitalization (78.9% vs. 37.9%, p < 0.001), and had a shorter median time to endoscopy (median [interquartile range]: 17 [12–23] vs. 34 [17–56] h, p < 0.001) than those admitted on holidays. No significant differences in in-hospital mortality rate, number of blood transfusions, endoscopic interventions, additional interventions (including angioembolization and surgery), and length of stay were observed. Patients admitted on holidays had increased admission costs than those admitted on non-holidays (751 [495–1203] vs. 660 [432–1028] US dollars, p= 0.033). After adjusting for confounding factors, holiday admission was a predictor of early endoscopy (adjusted odds ratio 0.159; 95% confidence interval, 0096–0.264, p < 0.001), but was not associated with in-hospital mortality or other clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding who were admitted on holidays had a lower rate of early endoscopy, longer time to endoscopy, and higher admission cost than those admitted on non-holidays. Holiday admission was not associated with in-hospital mortality or other clinical outcomes.

Effect of Admission Time on the Outcomes of Liver Cirrhosis with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Regular Hours versus Off-Hours Admission

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is a lethal complication of liver cirrhosis. We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with liver cirrhosis and AUGIB who were admitted to hospital on regular hours and off-hours.

METHODS

This retrospective study screened all cirrhotic patients with AUGIB who were admitted to our hospital from January 2010 to June 2014 for the test cohort and from December 2014 to March 2018 for the validation cohort. A 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust the Child-Pugh and MELD scores. In-hospital mortality, 5-day rebleeding rate, length of stay, and total payment were primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 826 and 173 patients with liver cirrhosis and AUGIB were included in the test and validation cohorts, respectively. After propensity score matching, 226 and 40 patients were included in the test and validation cohorts, respectively. The overall analysis of the test cohort found significantly higher Child-Pugh score (P=0.006), 5-day rebleeding rate (18.69% versus 10.72%, P=0.001), and total payment (¥25,906.83 versus ¥22,017.42, P<0.001) in patients admitted on off-hours. By contrast, the overall analysis of the validation cohort did not find any difference in Child-Pugh score, 5-day rebleeding, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, or hospital payment between patients admitted on regular hours and off-hours. Similarly, the propensity score matching analyses of both test and validation cohorts found no difference in these primary outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-hours admission might not be negatively associated with the outcomes of patients with liver cirrhosis and AUGIB.

"Weekend Effect" in Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

"Weekend effect" refers to worse outcomes among patients presenting to the hospital on weekends or holidays. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies assessing the impact of the "weekend effect" in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH).

METHODS

We searched key bibliographic databases using keywords and MeSH terms related to gastrointestinal hemorrhage and "weekend effect". Our primary analysis evaluated mortality in patients with UGIH who were hospitalized on the weekend or after-hours compared with a weekday. Secondary outcomes included need for definitive therapy and length of hospital stay. Relevant data were extracted and meta-analyses were performed using random effects model. Subgroup sensitivity analyses were also performed to assess the effects of key variables.

RESULTS

A total of 21 of 224 identified studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, there was no association between weekend admission and mortality among patients with UGIH (Odds Ratio (OR): 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.14). However, meta-analysis using only the nine studies that did not report having a weekend rounder showed a significant increase in mortality (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.07-1.17). There was no effect of weekend admission on any of our secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence suggests that weekend admission is associated with significant increase in mortality in patients with non-variceal UGIH but no difference in mortality was noted in patients with variceal UGIH. Our findings are relevant to policymakers, practitioners and providers who should ensure the creation of consistent quality and access to care throughout the week.

Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Timing of Endoscopy and Ways to Improve Endoscopic Visualization

Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy is the cornerstone of diagnosis and management of patients presenting with acute UGI bleeding. Once hemodynamically resuscitated, early endoscopy (performed within 24 hours of patient presentation) ensures accurate identification of the bleeding source, facilitates risk stratification based on endoscopic stigmata, and allows endotherapy to be delivered where indicated. Moreover, the preendoscopy use of a prokinetic agent (eg, i.v. erythromycin), especially in patients with a suspected high probability of having blood or clots in the stomach before undergoing endoscopy, may result in improved endoscopic visualization, a higher diagnostic yield, and less need for repeat endoscopy.