1
|
Ofstead CL, Hopkins KM, Preston AL, James CY, Holdsworth JE, Smart AG, Lamb LA, Love KL. Fluid retention in endoscopes: A real-world study on drying effectiveness. Am J Infect Control 2024; 52:635-643. [PMID: 38408542 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2024.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outbreaks linked to inadequate endoscope drying have infected numerous patients, and current standards and guidelines recommend at least 10 minutes of forced air for drying channels. This study evaluated a new forced-air drying system (FADS) for endoscopes. METHODS Drying was assessed using droplet detection cards; visual inspection of air/water connectors, suction connectors, and distal ends; and borescope examinations of endoscope interiors. Assessments were performed after automated endoscope reprocessor (AER) alcohol flush and air purge cycles and after 10-minute FADS cycles. RESULTS Researchers evaluated drying during encounters with 22 gastroscopes and 20 colonoscopes. After default AER alcohol and air purge cycles, 100% (42/42) of endoscopes were still wet. Substantial fluid emerged from distal ends during the first 15 seconds of the FADS cycle, and droplets also emerged from air/water and suction connectors. Following FADS cycle completion, 100% (42/42) were dry, with no retained fluid detected by any of the assessment methods. CONCLUSIONS Multiple endoscope ports and channels remained wet after AER cycles intended to aid in drying but were dry after the FADS cycle. This study reinforced the need to evaluate the effectiveness of current drying practices and illustrated the use of practical tools in a real-world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cori L Ofstead
- Ofstead & Associates, Inc., Research Department, Bloomington, MN.
| | | | - Aaron L Preston
- Emory University Hospital Midtown, Infection Prevention Department, Atlanta, GA
| | - Charesse Y James
- Emory University Hospital Midtown, Endoscopy Department, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jill E Holdsworth
- Emory University Hospital Midtown, Infection Prevention Department, Atlanta, GA
| | - Abigail G Smart
- Ofstead & Associates, Inc., Research Department, Bloomington, MN
| | - Larry A Lamb
- Ofstead & Associates, Inc., Research Department, Bloomington, MN
| | - Kari L Love
- Emory Healthcare, Infection Prevention Department, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chang WK, Peng CL, Chen YW, Sun CK, Chen CC, Liu TC, Chu YY, Tsai IF, Chung CS, Lin HF, Hsu FY, Tai WC, Lee HC, Yen HH, Wang EM, Chen SH, Chu CH, Chen MJ, Lu CL, Chiu CT. Recommendations and guidelines for endoscope reprocessing: Current position statement of digestive endoscopic society of Taiwan. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, IMMUNOLOGY, AND INFECTION = WEI MIAN YU GAN RAN ZA ZHI 2024; 57:211-224. [PMID: 38135645 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Reprocessing of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes and accessories is an essential part of patient safety and quality control in GI endoscopy centers. However, current endoscopic reprocessing guidelines or procedures are not adequate to ensure patient-safe endoscopy. Approximately 5.4 % of the clinically used duodenoscopes remain contaminated with high-concern microorganisms. Thus, the Digestive Endoscopy Society of Taiwan (DEST) sets standards for the reprocessing of GI endoscopes and accessories in endoscopy centers. DEST organized a task force working group using the guideline-revision process. These guidelines contain principles and instructions of step-by-step for endoscope reprocessing. The updated guidelines were established after a thorough review of the existing global and local guidelines, systematic reviews, and health technology assessments of clinical effectiveness. This guideline aims to provide detailed recommendations for endoscope reprocessing to ensure adequate quality control in endoscopy centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Kuo Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Ling Peng
- Department of Integrated Diagnostics & Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Wei Chen
- Endoscopy Center for Diagnosis and Treatment, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Cheuk-Kay Sun
- Division of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei 11101, Taiwan
| | - Chieh-Chang Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Tao-Chieh Liu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taiwan
| | - Yin-Yi Chu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - I-Fang Tsai
- Ultrasonography and Endoscopy Center, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Shuan Chung
- Ultrasonography and Endoscopy Center, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Fen Lin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Renai Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Fang-Yu Hsu
- Therapeutic Endoscopic Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chen Tai
- Division of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsi-Chang Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Renai Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Hsu-Heng Yen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan
| | - E-Ming Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Hui Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Hsin Chu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Jen Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Liang Lu
- Endoscopy Center for Diagnosis and Treatment, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Tang Chiu
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sonaiya S, Marino R, Agollari K, Sharma P, Desai M. Environmentally sustainable gastroenterology practice: Review of current state and future goals. Dig Endosc 2024; 36:406-420. [PMID: 37723605 DOI: 10.1111/den.14688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The health-care sector contributes 4.6% of global greenhouse gas emissions, with gastroenterology playing a significant role due to the widespread use of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. In this review, we aim to understand the carbon footprint in gastroenterology practice associated with GI endoscopy, conferences and recruitment, identify barriers to change, and recommend mitigating strategies. METHODS A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to explore the carbon footprint in gastroenterology practice, focusing on endoscopy, inpatient and outpatient settings, and recruitment practices. Recommendations for mitigating the carbon footprint were derived. RESULTS This narrative review analyzed 34 articles on the carbon footprint in gastroenterology practice. Carbon footprint of endoscopy in the United States is approximately 85,768 metric tons of CO2 emission annually, equivalent to 9 million gallons of gasoline consumed, or 94 million pounds of coal burned. Each endoscopy generates 2.1 kg of disposable waste (46 L volume), of which 64% of waste goes to the landfill, 28% represents biohazard waste, and 9% is recycled. The per-case manufacturing carbon footprint for single-use devices and reusable devices is 1.37 kg CO2 and 0.0017 kg CO2, respectively. Inpatient and outpatient services contributed through unnecessary procedures, prolonged hospital stays, and excessive use of single-use items. Fellowship recruitment and gastrointestinal conferences added to the footprint, mainly due to air travel and hotel stays. CONCLUSION Gastrointestinal endoscopy and practice contribute to the carbon footprint through the use of disposables such as single-use endoscopes and waste generation. To achieve environmental sustainability, measures such as promoting reusable endoscopy equipment over single-use endoscopes, calculating institutional carbon footprints, establishing benchmarking standards, and embracing virtual platforms such as telemedicine and research meetings should be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sneh Sonaiya
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Richard Marino
- Kansas City University School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA
| | - Klea Agollari
- Kansas City University School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA
| | | | - Madhav Desai
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang R, Zhao G, Yan Z, Xuan H, Chen Y. The effective dose of remimazolam in adult gastroscopy. Indian J Pharmacol 2024; 56:10-15. [PMID: 38454583 PMCID: PMC11001170 DOI: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_425_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to explore the median effective dose (ED50) and the dose required for successful anesthesia in 95% of the patients (ED95) of remimazolam for intravenous anesthesia in adult outpatients undergoing gastroscopy. METHODS This pilot study was conducted in patients scheduled to undergo painless gastroscopy at the authors' hospital between March 15, 2022 and March 25, 2022. The ED of remimazolam was determined using the modified Dixon sequential method, using an initial induction dose of 0.2 mg/kg. With successful or failed anesthesia, the remimazolam dose was decreased or increased by 0.05 mg/kg for the next patient, respectively. RESULTS Twenty-two patients (43.6 ± 10.5 years of age) were enrolled. During gastroscopy, the remimazolam induction dose was 19.93 ± 2.96 mg (0.2-0.45 mg/kg). Eighteen patients could complete anesthesia with remimazolam alone, and four patients needed propofol to complete anesthesia. The induction time after the injection of remimazolam was 20.8 ± 8.4 s, the gastroscopy time was 5.1 ± 1.3 min, and the anesthesia recovery time was 17.5 ± 5.6 min. The ED50 and the ED95 of remimazolam were 0.362 mg/kg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.313-0.455 mg/kg) and 0.464 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.403-2.242 mg/kg), respectively. The vital signs of all patients remained within the predefined acceptable limits. No patients required antagonist rescue. CONCLUSION The ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam for adult gastroscopy were 0.362 mg/kg and 0.464 mg/kg, respectively. Additional anesthetics might be required during gastroscopy in some patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered. The number is ChiCTR2200057446.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rongyan Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhuji Central Hospital, Zhuji, Zhejiang, China
| | - Gang Zhao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhuji People’s Hospital, Zhuji, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhangjun Yan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhuji People’s Hospital, Zhuji, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hongmei Xuan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhuji People’s Hospital, Zhuji, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhuji People’s Hospital, Zhuji, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ho JCL, Lui RN, Ho SH, Hock NTC, Luo X, Tang RSY, Chiu PWY, Ang TL. Asia-Pacific survey on green endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39:133-140. [PMID: 37967819 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Greenhouse gas emissions are the fundamental cause of global warming, with CO2 being the most contributive. Carbon reduction has been widely advocated to mitigate the climate crisis. The endoscopy unit is the third highest waste-generating department in a hospital. The awareness and acceptance of the practice of green endoscopy among healthcare workers is unclear. METHOD An online survey was conducted over a 5-week period from July to August 2023 in the Asia-Pacific region, which targeted endoscopists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals of the endoscopy unit. The primary outcome was the agreement to adopt green endoscopy. The secondary outcomes included views on sustainable practices, factors associated with increased acceptance of green endoscopy, the acceptance of different carbon reduction measures, and the perceived barriers to implementation. RESULTS A total of 259 valid responses were received. Overall, 79.5% of participants agreed to incorporate green endoscopy into their practice. Nevertheless, existing green policies were only reported by 12.7% of respondents. The level of understanding of green endoscopy is the only significant factor associated with its acceptance (odds ratio 3.10, P < 0.007). Potential barriers to implementation include healthcare cost increment, infection risk, inadequate awareness, and lack of policy and industrial support. CONCLUSION Green endoscopy is well accepted among healthcare workers but not widely implemented. The level of understanding is highly associated with its acceptance, highlighting the importance of education. A reliable assessment tool is needed to quantify the environmental impact of endoscopy. Further studies are needed to ascertain its benefit and cost effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacky C L Ho
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Rashid N Lui
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Shiaw-Hooi Ho
- Department of Medicine, University of Malaya Medical Centre and Specialist Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Nicholas T C Hock
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, SingHealth, Hong Kong, China
| | - Xiaobei Luo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Raymond S Y Tang
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Philip W Y Chiu
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Tiing Leong Ang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, SingHealth, Hong Kong, China
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dabaja-Younis HK, Schechner V, Firan I, Khamaysi I, Levi GD, Lurie-Weinberger MN, Weissman A, Guriel Y, Geffen Y, Hussein K. Identification and control of two outbreaks of unrelated New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli traced to the same endoscope defect. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023; 44:1673-1675. [PMID: 36815278 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2023.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
We report 2 outbreaks of genetically unrelated carbapenem-resistant New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli caused by contaminated duodenoscopes. Using endoscopes with disposable end caps, adherence to the manufacturer's reprocessing instructions, routine audits, and manufacturer evaluation are critical in preventing such outbreaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halima K Dabaja-Younis
- Infection Control and Prevention Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
- The Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Vered Schechner
- National Institute for Antibiotic Resistance and Infection Control, Ministry of Health, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Ibrahim Firan
- Infection Control and Prevention Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Iyad Khamaysi
- The Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
- Gastroenterology Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Gabrielle D Levi
- National Institute for Antibiotic Resistance and Infection Control, Ministry of Health, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mor N Lurie-Weinberger
- National Institute for Antibiotic Resistance and Infection Control, Ministry of Health, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Avi Weissman
- The Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
- Hospital Management, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Yuri Guriel
- Gastroenterology Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Yuval Geffen
- The Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
- Microbiology Laboratory, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Khetam Hussein
- Infection Control and Prevention Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
- The Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guadagnin SVT, Costa DDM, Primo MGB, Silva AA, Leão-Vasconcelos LSNDO, Vickery K, Tipple AFV. Significant increased bacterial contamination with endoscope overnight and weekend storage times. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38:1559-1565. [PMID: 37254616 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Forced-air drying (FAD) cabinets are recommended for storage of reprocessed endoscopes, but financial constraints prevent their universal application. The study aimed to determine bacterial contamination in flexible gastroscopes (FG) channels after storage, in a cabinet with filtered air and UV lights, but without FAD. METHODS Eight FG in clinical use in an endoscopy service of a large Brazilian hospital were sampled: immediately "Time zero" (N = 50), 12 h "Time 1" (N = 25), and 60 h "Time 2" (N = 25) after reprocessing. Following a flush-brush-flush of channels, 40-mL sterile water and 3 cm of the brush were collected. Each sample was divided, filtered onto two 0.22-μm membranes, and incubated in media without or with disinfectant neutralizer. Automated method was used for identification and antibiotic resistance test of isolated bacteria. RESULTS Bacterial contamination in times "1" and "2" was 5.9 and 16.1 times greater than that of "Time zero," respectively. Number of positive cultures in media with and without neutralizer was similar at times "1" and "2," while media with neutralizer produced more positive cultures at "Time zero." Most bacteria isolated at "Time 2" were Gram-negative rods (52.3%) and showed resistance to one or more antibiotics (65%). CONCLUSION Bacterial contamination was detected on reprocessed FG stored in non-FAD cabinets overnight (12 h) and increased with longer storage time (60 h). The contamination source is likely to be bacteria in biofilm which multiply in the absence of FAD. Evidence-based criteria should be available for storage time according to the cabinet available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dayane de Melo Costa
- Faculty of Nursing, Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Goias, Brazil
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Karen Vickery
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thiveaud D, Durand F, Hajjar J, Le Dinh E, Metz V, Napoleon B, Plessis C, Prat F, Vanbiervliet G, Durand-Zaleski I, Ponchon T. Costs of purchase, maintenance, microbiological control, and reprocessing of a reusable duodenoscope. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E873-E879. [PMID: 37942444 PMCID: PMC10629588 DOI: 10.1055/a-2153-7016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The costs of reusable endoscope reprocessing have been evaluated, yet external validity of the findings remains challenging. The aim of this study was to assess the costs of purchase, maintenance, microbiological control, and reprocessing of a reusable duodenoscope per endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in France. Study findings exclude the costs of infection, downtime due to breakdown, reprocessing single-use material disposal, and device disposal, all of which should also be considered. Materials and methods The study encompassed both observational and theoretical approaches. Observational data were collected in four hospitals, from December 2019 to December 2020, with an ad hoc survey, based on 2016 and 2018 national guidelines for duodenoscope reprocessing. Costs were modeled, using the same guidelines, assuming a mean workload of 223 ERCP/duodenoscope/year. Results The mean observed cost of purchase, maintenance, microbiological control, reprocessing (human resources and consumables), and overhead (additional 35%) with a reusable duodenoscope was €80.23 (standard deviation €3.77) per ERCP. The corresponding mean theoretical cost was €182.71 for manual reprocessing without endoscope drying cabinet (EDC), €191.36 for manual reprocessing with EDC, €235.25 for automated endoscope reprocessing (AER) without EDC, and €253.62 for AER with EDC. Conclusions Because procedures, equipment, volume activity, number of duodenoscopes, human resources, and internal work organizations are hospital-dependent, observed costs varied between hospitals. Theoretical costs were higher than observed costs, showing that the theoretical approach is not sufficient. Hypotheses to explain the difference between the two approaches include failing to measure some costs in the survey and challenges in guideline implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fanny Durand
- Pôle Thoraco-Abdomen, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Joseph Hajjar
- Medical Officer of Health and Epidemiologist, Honorary Hospital Practitioner, Pau, France
| | | | - Vanessa Metz
- Pharmacy, Hopital Europeen Marseille, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Thierry Ponchon
- Hepatogastroenterology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nylander D, Leeds J, Perry J, Narayanan M, Dipper C, Gunn M, Nayar M, Speight A, Oppong KW. Bacterial contamination of endoscopist and assistant face visors during gastrointestinal endoscopy: a pilot study. Frontline Gastroenterol 2023; 14:505-511. [PMID: 37854781 PMCID: PMC10579546 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2023-102427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and aim During the COVID-19 pandemic, health workers' facial exposure to pathogens has been brought into focus. In this study, we aimed to determine the occurrence and degree of facial contamination to both endoscopists and their assistants during endoscopic procedures to help inform future safety measures. Methods Non-sterile visors worn by endoscopist, assistant and room control visors from 50 procedures were swabbed post procedure for culture. Procedure type, therapy, duration and evidence of visible visor contamination were recorded. After 48-hour incubation, all bacterial colonies were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Organisms were classified into skin/environmental, oronasal and enteric. Results A total of 104 visors were available for assessment (93 staff; 11 control). In worn visors, skin/environmental flora were isolated from 70, oronasal flora from 8, and enteric flora from 3 with an average colony count of >9.5. Notably, bacteria of enteric origin (Escherichia coli and Enterobacter cloacae) were isolated from three worn visors. In room control, skin/environmental flora were isolated from seven and oronasal flora from one with average colony count of five. No room control visors grew enteric flora. Overall, 9.1% room control and 10.8% worn visors were contaminated with organisms that could possibly have originated from patients. However, enteric flora were only obtained from worn visors. No visors were visibly contaminated. Conclusion This pilot study demonstrates risk of contamination to faces of endoscopists and assistants. Larger studies are required to determine degree of risk and to give guidance on facial protection during gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Nylander
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - John Leeds
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - John Perry
- Department of Microbiology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Manjusha Narayanan
- Department of Microbiology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Chris Dipper
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Mel Gunn
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Manu Nayar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ally Speight
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Kofi W Oppong
- HPB Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Speer T, Vickery K, Alfa M, Sáenz R. Minimizing the Risks of Simethicone in Endoscope Reprocessing. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:153-158. [PMID: 36508253 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
This statement was written under the auspices of the World Gastroenterology Organization's Guidelines Committee. The authors are members of the Review Team of the WGO Endoscope Disinfection Guideline and have experience in endoscopy, endoscope reprocessing, and microbiology, including biofilms. During the preparation of the WGO Update on Endoscope Disinfection Guidelines, concerns about simethicone on endoscope channel surfaces compromising cleaning and disinfection were raised. Publications on simethicone, including modes of delivery, effectiveness, and risks, have been reviewed. The paper was written as a companion to the new guidelines with a focus on minimizing the risks of simethicone in endoscope reprocessing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony Speer
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Roque Sáenz
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Desarrollo, Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Investigation of the Internal Conditions of 213 Reprocessed Endoscopic Channels. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY, ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES 2023; 33:4-11. [PMID: 36633916 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Studies have indicated that endoscope reprocessing failure might be attributed to internal damage or residual liquid in endoscopes. However, large-sample survey data on the internal conditions of endoscopic channels after reprocessing are lacking. This study used a borescope to investigate the internal cleanliness and damage of 213 endoscopic biopsy channels after reprocessing at the endoscopy center of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, provided in theoretical basis for the efficacy of endoscope reprocessing and maintenance. METHODS A borescope was used to observe and analyze the inside of the endoscopic biopsy channel of 213 reprocessed endoscopes (in accordance with the Chinese health industry standard "Regulation for cleaning and disinfection technique of flexible endoscope (WS 507-2016). Each endoscope was observed for at least 10 minutes, and the results were recorded and evaluated by 5 researchers independently. RESULTS In all, 2504 images and 109 videos were recorded, and abnormal findings were classified into 10 categories: scratches (91.5%, 195/213), scratches with adherent peel (46.0%, 98/213), discolored areas (49.3%, 105/213), transparent drops (28.2%, 60/213), milky drops (23.9%, 51/213), white particles (46.9%, 100/213), attached materials (37.6%, 80/213), wear on metal parts (41.3%, 88/213), rust (23.9%, 51/213), and black spots (35.7%, 76/213). Among scratches, those in Teflon from 0-10 cm at the apex of the biopsy channel outlet and in metal from 0-5 cm at the biopsy channel inlet accounted for 58.4% (114/195) and 96.4% (188/195), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Scratches were the most common form of damage in the endoscopic biopsy channels investigated and were related to the use of endoscopic accessories and cleaning brush materials. The incidence of other abnormalities gradually increased with the duration of use and began to increase significantly after 18 months. All abnormalities have a certain impact on the quality of endoscope reprocessing. We recommend that a borescope be used to check the inside of endoscopic biopsy channels regularly to determine the damage and cleaning conditions and that these channels be reprocessed, repaired, or replaced in a timely manner.
Collapse
|
12
|
Sebastian S, Dhar A, Baddeley R, Donnelly L, Haddock R, Arasaradnam R, Coulter A, Disney BR, Griffiths H, Healey C, Hillson R, Steinbach I, Marshall S, Rajendran A, Rochford A, Thomas-Gibson S, Siddhi S, Stableforth W, Wesley E, Brett B, Morris AJ, Douds A, Coleman MG, Veitch AM, Hayee B. Green endoscopy: British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), Joint Accreditation Group (JAG) and Centre for Sustainable Health (CSH) joint consensus on practical measures for environmental sustainability in endoscopy. Gut 2023; 72:12-26. [PMID: 36229172 PMCID: PMC9763195 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
GI endoscopy is highly resource-intensive with a significant contribution to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and waste generation. Sustainable endoscopy in the context of climate change is now the focus of mainstream discussions between endoscopy providers, units and professional societies. In addition to broader global challenges, there are some specific measures relevant to endoscopy units and their practices, which could significantly reduce environmental impact. Awareness of these issues and guidance on practical interventions to mitigate the carbon footprint of GI endoscopy are lacking. In this consensus, we discuss practical measures to reduce the impact of endoscopy on the environment applicable to endoscopy units and practitioners. Adoption of these measures will facilitate and promote new practices and the evolution of a more sustainable specialty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaji Sebastian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, UK .,Clinical Sciences Centre, Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK
| | - Anjan Dhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Darlington Memorial Hospital, Darlington, UK,School of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Robin Baddeley
- Institute for Therapeutic Endoscopy, King's College Hospital, London, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's National Bowel Hospital & Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Leigh Donnelly
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK
| | - Rosemary Haddock
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - Ramesh Arasaradnam
- Applied Biological and Experimental Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK,Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Archibald Coulter
- Department of Gastroenterology, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | - Benjamin Robert Disney
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Helen Griffiths
- Department of Gastroenterology, Brecon War Memorial Hospital, Brecon, UK
| | - Christopher Healey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Airedale NHS Foundation Trust, Keighley, UK
| | | | | | - Sarah Marshall
- Bowel Cancer Screening & Endoscopy, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK,Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy, London, UK
| | - Arun Rajendran
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Uxbridge, UK
| | - Andrew Rochford
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Free Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Siwan Thomas-Gibson
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Mark's National Bowel Hospital & Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Sandeep Siddhi
- Department of Gastroenterology, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - William Stableforth
- Departments of Gastroenterology & Endoscopy, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
| | - Emma Wesley
- Departments of Gastroenterology & Endoscopy, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK
| | - Bernard Brett
- Department of Gastroenterology, Norfolk and Norwich Hospitals NHS Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Andrew Douds
- Department of Gastroenterology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Mark Giles Coleman
- Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy, London, UK,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Plymouth University Hospitals Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Andrew M Veitch
- Department of Gastroenterology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- King's Health Partners Institute for Therapeutic Endoscopy, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
WGO Guideline-Endoscope Disinfection Update. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:1-9. [PMID: 36084165 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
14
|
Infection control in the bronchoscopy suite: effective reprocessing and disinfection of reusable bronchoscopes. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2023; 29:21-28. [PMID: 36354125 DOI: 10.1097/mcp.0000000000000925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW With advancements in technology, flexible bronchoscopes have become thinner in diameter and in need of more thorough reprocessing to prevent infection transmission than ever before. Many experienced bronchoscopists are not aware of the critical steps involved in effective bronchoscope reprocessing and we hope to bridge this gap by describing this process in detail. RECENT FINDINGS Bronchoscope reprocessing includes several distinct steps (precleaning, leak testing, manual cleaning, visual inspection, terminal reprocessing, rinsing and drying). Each step is comprehensive and needs to be carried out systematically by trained personnel. Failure of any step can lead to serious downstream events such as outbreaks and pseudo-outbreaks. Some experts now recommend sterilization when feasible, although high-level disinfection remains the minimum standard. We also will review some literature on the utility of borescopes, automated endoscope reprocessors and disposable bronchoscopes. SUMMARY Our article will focus on the most recent recommendations for effective reprocessing and disinfection of reusable bronchoscopes.
Collapse
|
15
|
Liu Y, Xu S, Muhetaer G, Tang H, Guo H, Li H. Evaluation of the Application Effect of a New Anti-reflux Water Injection Tube Device in the Prevention of the Contamination of Endoscopy Water Injection Bottles. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 68:1728-1734. [PMID: 36547820 PMCID: PMC9773661 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07796-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Water delivery tube reflux during gastrointestinal endoscopy examination is widespread and it is the leading cause of water injection bottle pollution. AIM To evaluate the application effect of a new anti-reflux water injection tube device in preventing the contamination of endoscopy water injection bottles. METHODS A total of 520 cases received gastrointestinal endoscopy examination were included. Patients were randomly divided into the experimental and control group. The experimental group used the anti-reflux injection tube device to assist with water injection, and the control group used the ordinary delivery tube. After every five cases of gastrointestinal endoscopy, water from the injection bottles was collected. Visual inspection, crystalline violet staining, microbial culture, and microbial species analysis were performed to analyze the contamination state of the water samples. RESULTS The contamination rate in the experimental group was 5.66%, significantly lower than 76.47% in the control group. Crystalline violet staining confirmed that microorganisms existed in contaminated water samples. Microbiological culture results showed that the experimental group's undetectable rate of bacteria and fungi was 100%, significantly higher than that of the control group (19.61% for bacteria and 25.49% for fungi). The mean values of the total bacterial and fungal colonies of the control samples were 9.80 × 106 cfu/ml and 9.18 × 106 cfu/ml, respectively. The microbial species in the contaminated samples of the control group were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Proteus mirabilis. CONCLUSION The anti-reflux water injection tube device can effectively prevent the contamination of the endoscopy water injection bottles caused by the reflux of the ordinary water supply tube.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingjing Liu
- Shenzhen Bao’an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, 518133 China
| | - Shenting Xu
- Shenzhen Bao’an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, 518133 China
| | - Gulizeba Muhetaer
- Shenzhen Bao’an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, 518133 China
| | - Hao Tang
- Shenzhen Bao’an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, 518133 China
| | - Hongtao Guo
- Shenzhen BAGEMEI Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, 518035 China
| | - Hang Li
- Shenzhen Bao’an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, 518133 China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chung KH, Chae JD, Choe W, Lee HY, Oh IH, Son BK. Efficacy of a novel channel-cleaning ball brush for endoscope reprocessing: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Endosc 2022; 55:674-682. [PMID: 35916003 PMCID: PMC9539290 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2021.210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Endoscopic channels are difficult to clean and can cause infection transmission. We examined the effectiveness of a newly developed channel-cleaning ball brush (BB), which is sucked into the endoscopic channel and scrapes and cleans the lumen as it passes through.
Methods The upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopes used for patient examinations were randomly selected as the conventional brush (CB) or BB group. After manual cleaning, the presence or absence of carbohydrates, proteins, adenosine triphosphate, and hemoglobin was assessed.
Results Fifty-six and 58 endoscopes were cleaned with the CB and BB, respectively. Carbohydrate and protein were detected in one (1.8%) and two endoscopes (3.4%) in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=1.000). Hemoglobin was observed in one (1.8%) and three endoscopes (5.2%) in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.636). The adenosine triphosphate levels were 10.6±15.9 and 12.5±14.3 relative light units in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.496). Twenty-seven (48.2%) and 19 (32.8%) endoscopes were positive for microbial cultures in the CB and BB groups, respectively (p=0.136).
Conclusions The efficacy of BB was not significantly different from that of CB in the endoscopic channel-cleaning process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwang Hyun Chung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Jeong Don Chae
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wonho Choe
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Hyo Young Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Il Hwan Oh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Byoung Kwan Son
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rauwers AW, Voor In 't Holt AF, Buijs JG, Groot WD, Erler NS, Vos MC, Bruno MJ. Assessment of postmanual cleaning adenosine triphosphate tests to prevent the use of contaminated duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes: the DETECT study. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:282-290.e5. [PMID: 35341715 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS We investigated whether the use of postmanual cleaning adenosine triphosphate (ATP) tests lowers the number of duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes (DLEs) contaminated with gut flora. METHODS In this single-center before-and-after study, DLEs were ATP tested after cleaning. During the control period, participants were blinded to ATP results: ATP-positive DLEs were not recleaned. During the intervention period, ATP-positive DLEs were recleaned. DLEs underwent microbiologic sampling after high-level disinfection (HLD) with participants blinded to culture results. RESULTS Using 15 endoscopes of 5 different DLE types, we included 909 procedures (52% duodenoscopes, 48% linear echoendoscopes). During the intervention period, the absolute rate of contamination with gut flora was higher (16% vs 21%). The main analysis showed that contamination was less likely to occur in the intervention period (odds ratio, .32; 95% credible interval [CI], .12-.85). A secondary analysis showed that this effect was based on 1 particular duodenoscope type (estimated probability, 39% [95% CI, 18%-64%] vs 9% [95% CI, 2%-21%]), whereas no effect was seen in the other 4 DLE types. In detail, of the 4 duodenoscopes of this type, 2 had lower contamination rates (69% vs 39% and 36% vs 10%). During the control period, both these duodenoscopes had multiple episodes with ongoing contamination with the same microorganism that ended weeks before the start of the intervention period (ie, they were not terminated by ATP testing). CONCLUSIONS Postmanual cleaning ATP tests do not reduce post-HLD gut flora contamination rates of DLEs. Hence, postcleaning ATP tests are not suited as a means for quality control of endoscope reprocessing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjan W Rauwers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne F Voor In 't Holt
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jolanda G Buijs
- Staff Office Medical Devices, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Woutrinus de Groot
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole S Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet C Vos
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Taunk P, Shimpi R, Singh R, Collins J, Muthusamy VR, Day LW. GI endoscope reprocessing: a comparative review of organizational guidelines and guide for endoscopy units and regulatory agencies. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:1048-1059.e2. [PMID: 35303991 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pushpak Taunk
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Rahul Shimpi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ravi Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Great South Bay Endoscopy Center, LLC, East Patchogue, New York, USA
| | - James Collins
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Lukejohn W Day
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Deb A, Perisetti A, Goyal H, Aloysius MM, Sachdeva S, Dahiya D, Sharma N, Thosani N. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-Associated Infections: Update on an Emerging Issue. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:1718-1732. [PMID: 35262904 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07441-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Over 17.7 million gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures are performed annually, contributing to 68% of all endoscopic procedures in the United States. Usually, endoscopic procedures are low risk, but adverse events may occur, including cardiopulmonary complications, bleeding, perforation, pancreatitis, cholangitis, and infection. Infections after the GI endoscopies most commonly result from the patient's endogenous gut flora. Although many studies have reported infection after GI endoscopic procedures, a true estimate of the incidence rate of post-endoscopy infection is lacking. In addition, the infection profile and causative organisms have evolved over time. In recent times, multi-drug-resistant microorganisms have emerged as a cause of outbreaks of endoscope-associated infections (EAI). In addition, lapses in endoscope reprocessing have been reported, with some but not all outbreaks in recent times. This systematic review summarizes the demographical, clinical, and management data of EAI events reported in the literature. A total of 117 articles were included in the systematic review, with the majority reported from North America and Western Europe. The composite infection rate was calculated to be 0.2% following GI endoscopic procedures, 0.8% following ERCP, 0.123% following non-ERCP upper GI endoscopic procedures, and 0.073% following lower GI endoscopic procedures. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common culprit organism, followed by other Enterobacteriaceae groups of organisms and Gram-positive cocci. We have also elaborated different prevention methods such as antimicrobial prophylaxis, adequate sterilization methods for reprocessing endoscopes, periodic surveillance, and current evidence supporting their utilization. Finally, we discuss disposable endoscopes, which could be an alternative to reprocessing to minimize the chances of EAIs with their effects on the environmental and financial situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anasua Deb
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, 79430, USA
| | - Abhilash Perisetti
- Advance Endoscopy, Interventional Oncology & Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE), Parkview Cancer Institute, 11050 Parkview Circle, Fort Wayne, IN, 46845, USA
| | - Hemant Goyal
- The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, 501 S. Washington Avenue, Scranton, PA, 18503, USA.
| | - Mark M Aloysius
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, 501 S. Washington Avenue, Scranton, PA, 18505, USA
- Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, 525, Pine Street, Scranton, PA, 18510, USA
| | - Sonali Sachdeva
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dushyant Dahiya
- Central Michigan University College of Medicine, 1000 Houghton Ave, Saginaw, MI, 48603, USA
| | - Neil Sharma
- Division of Interventional Oncology & Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE), Parkview Cancer Institute, 11050 Parkview Circle, Fort Wayne, IN, 46845, USA
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Fort Wayne, IN, USA
| | - Nirav Thosani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Atilla Ertan MD Chair in Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, McGovern Medical School, UTHealth, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lisotti A, Zagari RM, Fusaroli P, Napoléon B. Optimal safety and pooled technical success rate for ERCP performed with single-use duodenoscopes. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:291-292. [PMID: 34838478 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, Hopital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Rocco Maurizio Zagari
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Imola, Italy
| | - Bertrand Napoléon
- Endoscopy Unit, Hopital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Heuvelmans M, Wunderink HF, van der Mei HC, Monkelbaan JF. A narrative review on current duodenoscope reprocessing techniques and novel developments. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2021; 10:171. [PMID: 34949217 PMCID: PMC8697464 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-021-01037-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Duodenoscopy-associated infections occur worldwide despite strict adherence to reprocessing standards. The exact scope of the problem remains unknown because a standardized sampling protocol and uniform sampling techniques are lacking. The currently available multi-society protocol for microbial culturing by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the American Society for Microbiology, published in 2018 is too laborious for broad clinical implementation. A more practical sampling protocol would result in increased accessibility and widespread implementation. This will aid to reduce the prevalence of duodenoscope contamination. To reduce the risk of duodenoscopy-associated pathogen transmission the FDA advised four supplemental reprocessing measures. These measures include double high-level disinfection, microbiological culturing and quarantine, ethylene oxide gas sterilization and liquid chemical sterilization. When the supplemental measures were advised in 2015 data evaluating their efficacy were sparse. Over the past five years data regarding the supplemental measures have become available that place the efficacy of the supplemental measures into context. As expected the advised supplemental measures have resulted in increased costs and reprocessing time. Unfortunately, it has also become clear that the efficacy of the supplemental measures falls short and that duodenoscope contamination remains a problem. There is a lot of research into new reprocessing methods and technical applications trying to solve the problem of duodenoscope contamination. Several promising developments such as single-use duodenoscopes, electrolyzed acidic water, and vaporized hydrogen peroxide plasma are already applied in a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Heuvelmans
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, G04.643, PO box 85500, 3508GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Herman F Wunderink
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, G04.643, PO box 85500, 3508GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Henny C van der Mei
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan F Monkelbaan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Spinzi G, Milano A, Brosolo P, Da Massa Carrara P, Labardi M, Merighi A, Riccardi L, Torresan F, Capelli M. Accreditation program for gastrointestinal endoscopes reprocessing in Italy: An on-site survey. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E1627-E1632. [PMID: 34790524 PMCID: PMC8589566 DOI: 10.1055/a-1535-1238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscope reprocessing has been associated with a variable failure rate. Our aim was to present an overview on current practices for reprocessing in Italian facilities and discuss the principle critical points. Methods In 2014 the Italian Society for Digestive Diseases implemented an accreditation program in collaboration with an independent organization for certification and with the Italian Association for Endoscopy Technical Operators. During a 1-day site visit of the endoscopy center, two endoscopists, one nurse, and the representative of the certification body evaluated the endoscope reprocessing. Results As of July 1, 2020, 28 endoscopy centers had been accredited. Ten centers are completing the measures to correct deficiencies found at the visit. Three centers withdrew from the program. The accreditation program has found variations between the various centers, confirming the poor compliance with guidelines. Major deviations from the standards, established by the model before the site visit according to national and international guidelines, concerned instrument cleaning (44.7 % of the centers), instrument storage (23.7 %), and microbiological tests (31.6 %). Conclusions Our overview demonstrated the lack of many reprocessing phases, which are important to prevent endoscopy-associated infections. Accreditation can achieve a transformation in quality and safety of reprocessing with the Italian centrally-led approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Spinzi
- Gasastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Valduce Hospital, Como – Italy
| | - Angelo Milano
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Chieti University, Chieti – Italy
| | - Piero Brosolo
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Pordenone Hospital, Pordenone – Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Labardi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Firenze Hospital, Firenze – Italy
| | - Alberto Merighi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Ferrara Hospital, Ferrara – Italy
| | - Luisa Riccardi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Perugia Hospital, Perugia – Italy
| | - Francesco Torresan
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Bologna University, Bologna – Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy units tend to be busy environments in which numerous categories of staff provide moderately complex procedural care to high volumes of patients. The prevention of infections of both patients and staff is a never-ending endeavor for both inpatient and outpatient environments. Necessary considerations must address patient-to-staff, staff-to-patient, environmental, and device-related transmission of infection. In addition to the typical environmental and interpersonal infection risks present in all medical environments, the major concern within the endoscopy suite relates to contamination and potential transmission via reusable devices and endoscopes. Our understanding of this ever-present issue has evolved over time and has become a major focus of scrutiny in the past 5 years. This significant problem has stimulated guidance and ingenuity by regulators, investigators, and industry. Most recently, the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 to 21 has also added significant burdens to our infection control efforts in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bret T Petersen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 201 1st Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mergener K. The Future of Endoscopic Operations After the Coronavirus Pandemic. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2021; 31:773-785. [PMID: 34538415 PMCID: PMC8149204 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic and its rapid global shutdowns have posed tremendous challenges for GI practices, including sudden delays in endoscopic procedures. As full reopening approaches, practices are wrestling with completely retooling their operations to ensure the resumption of high-quality, safe, and effective patient care. The pandemic's long-term effects on practice operations must be assessed: What will postpandemic GI care look like? Will some aspects of our work be changed forever, and if so, what are the practice management implications? This chapter surveys the pandemic's impact on US-based GI practices and discusses key "lessons learned" for future operations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Mergener
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington, 1917 Warren Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Casini B, Pan A, Guarini A, Rivara C, Zullo A, Monica F, Cimbro M, Casarano S, Inglese A, Vaghi A, Schiffino L, Capezzuto E, Da Massa Carrara P, Pasquale L. Multisocieties position paper: Microbiological surveillance on flexible endoscopes. Dig Liver Dis 2021; 53:1105-1111. [PMID: 34266792 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Transmission with endoscopes, particularly duodenoscope, of potential lethal infections prompted different scientific societies to deliver recommendations aimed reducing this risk. Some International societies extended recommendations on microbial surveillance to all the endoscopes and devices used in the reprocessing procedure. Considering the relevance of the topic, 8 Italian scientific societies of physicians, nurses and technical operators prepared a concerted document taking into account Institutional advisories and facilities in Italy. The rules for a correct microbial surveillance on endoscopes were detailed in term of what, how and when to perform the procedure, also suggesting behaviors in case of contamination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Casini
- Dipartimento di Ricerca Traslazionale e Nuove Tecnologie in Medicina e Chirurgia Università di Pisa, Pisa.
| | | | | | - Cinzia Rivara
- Gastroenterologia, S.C. ASL TO4 Ciriè-Chivasso-Cuorgnè, Torino
| | - Angelo Zullo
- Gastroenterologia, Ospedale Nuovo Regina Margherita, Roma
| | - Fabio Monica
- Gastroenterologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Cattinara, Trieste
| | | | | | | | - Adriano Vaghi
- Pneumologia, Ospedale Generale di Garbagnate Milanese, Milano
| | | | | | | | - Luigi Pasquale
- Gastroenterologia, S. O. Ospedale Frangipane, Ariano Irpino, Avellino
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bomman S, Kozarek RA, Thaker AM, Kodama C, Muthusamy VR, Ross AS, Krishnamoorthi R. Economic burden of enhanced practices of duodenoscopes reprocessing and surveillance: balancing risk and cost containment. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E1404-E1412. [PMID: 34466366 PMCID: PMC8382507 DOI: 10.1055/a-1515-2591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Recent outbreaks attributed to contaminated duodenoscopes have led to the development of enhanced surveillance and reprocessing techniques (enhanced-SRT) aimed at minimizing cross-contamination. Common enhanced-SRT include double high-level disinfection (HLD), ethylene oxide (EtO) gas sterilization, and culture-based monitoring of reprocessed scopes. Adoption of these methods adds to the operational costs and we aimed to assess its economic impact to an institution. Methods We compared the estimated costs of three enhanced-SRT versus single-HLD using data from two institutions. We examined the cost of capital measured as scope inventory and frequency of scope use per unit time, the constituent reprocessing costs required on a per-cycle basis, and labor & staffing needs. The economic impact attributable to enhanced-SRT was defined as the difference between the total cost of enhanced-SRT and single HLD. Results Compared to single HLD, adoption of double HLD increased the costs approximately by 47 % ($80 vs $118). Similarly, culture and quarantine and EtO sterilization increased costs by 160 % and 270 %, respectively ($80 vs $208 and $296). Enhanced-SRT introduced significant scope downtime due to prolonged techniques, necessitating a 3.4-fold increase in the number of scopes needed to maintain procedural volume. The additional annual budget required to implement enhanced-SRT approached $406,000 per year in high-volume centers. Conclusions While enhanced-SRT may reduce patient risk of exposure to contaminated duodenoscopes, it significantly increases the cost of performing ERCP. Future innovation should focus on approaches that can ensure patient safety while maintaining the ability to perform ERCP in a cost-effective manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivanand Bomman
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Richard A. Kozarek
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Adarsh M. Thaker
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Camilla Kodama
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - V. Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Andrew S. Ross
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Rajesh Krishnamoorthi
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mohamed DZ, Ghoneim MES, Abu-Risha SES, Abdelsalam RA, Farag MA. Gastrointestinal and hepatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: Manifestations, mechanism and management. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:4504-4535. [PMID: 34366621 PMCID: PMC8326263 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i28.4504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is considered the causative pathogen of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has become an international danger to human health. Although respiratory transmission and symptoms are still the essential manifestations of COVID-19, the digestive system could be an unconventional or supplementary route for COVID-19 to be transmitted and manifested, most likely due to the presence of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 can trigger hepatic injury via direct binding to the ACE2 receptor in cholangiocytes, antibody-dependent enhancement of infection, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, inflammatory cytokine storms, ischemia/reperfusion injury, and adverse events of treatment drugs. Gastrointestinal symptoms, including anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, which are unusual in patients with COVID-19, and some digestive signs may occur without other respiratory symptoms. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 can be found in infected patients' stool, demonstrating the likelihood of transmission through the fecal-oral route. In addition, liver function should be monitored during COVID-19, particularly in more severe cases. This review summarizes the evidence for extra-pulmonary manifestations, mechanisms, and management of COVID-19, particularly those related to the gastrointestinal tract and liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Zakaria Mohamed
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta 31511, Egypt
| | - Mai El-Sayed Ghoneim
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sadat City, Menoufia 32632, Egypt
| | - Sally El-Sayed Abu-Risha
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta 31511, Egypt
| | - Ramy Ahmed Abdelsalam
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35511, Egypt
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Grassi G, Lenci I, Signorello A, Milana M, Baiocchi L. Gastrointestinal endoscopy in cirrhotic patient: Issues on the table. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 13:210-220. [PMID: 34326942 PMCID: PMC8311468 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i7.210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with liver cirrhosis are fragile and present specific clinical hallmarks. When undergoing to gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, these subjects require an individual pre evaluation, taking into account: Level of haemostasis impairment, the individual risk of infection, the impact of sedation on hepatic encephalopathy and other factors. The overall assessment of liver function, employing common scoring systems, should be also assessed in the preprocedural phase. Beside some common general problems, regarding GI endoscopy in cirrhotic subjects, also specific issues are present for some frequent indications or procedures. For instance, despite an increased incidence of adenomas in cirrhosis, colon cancer screening remains suboptimal in subjects with this disease. Several studies in fact demonstrated liver cirrhosis as a negative factor for an adequate colon cleansing before colonoscopy. On the other hand, also the routine assessment of gastroesophageal varices during upper GI endoscopy presents some concern, since important inter-observer variability or incomplete description of endoscopic findings has been reported in some studies. In this review we discussed in details the most relevant issues that may be considered while performing general GI endoscopic practice, in patient with cirrhosis. For most of these issues there are no guidelines or clear indications. Moreover until now, few studies focused on these aspects. We believe that targeting these issues with corrective measures may be helpful to develop a tailored endoscopic approach for cirrhosis, in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Grassi
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | - Ilaria Lenci
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | | | - Martina Milana
- Hepatology Unit, University of Tor Vergata, Rome 00100, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Eichel VM, Jabs JM, Unser S, Mutters NT, Scherrer M. Does the Reprocessing of Endoscopes Have to Take Place Immediately after Pre-Cleaning? A First Evaluation. Clin Endosc 2021; 54:526-533. [PMID: 34256556 PMCID: PMC8357578 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2020.238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims The recommendations on the time interval between pre-cleaning and reprocessing of endoscopes differ in international guidelines, with a low level of evidence. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of postponing reprocessing on the reprocessing quality after pre-cleaning the flexible endoscopes.
Methods We reprocessed 124 standardized test tubes simulating endoscope channels after soiling and contamination and determined the reprocessing performance. In addition, we examined contaminated gastroscopes, colonoscopes, and bronchoscopes. The duration of interim storage after pre-cleaning was 16 h for 100 test tubes and up to 24 h for 18 endoscopes. We determined the residual protein content and germ load as markers for cleaning and disinfection performance. In addition, we determined biofilm formation by photometry of crystal violet staining.
Results All test tubes and flexible endoscopes showed residual protein content and germ load significantly below legally prescribed threshold values, independent of the interval between pre-cleaning and reprocessing.
Conclusions Our findings indicate that flexible endoscopes could be stored overnight after pre-cleaning without any influence on the quality of reprocessing. While ensuring patient safety, this could simplify logistical processes and enable cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa M Eichel
- Section for Hospital Hygiene and Environmental Health, Center for Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonas M Jabs
- Section for Hospital Hygiene and Environmental Health, Center for Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, Heidelberg, Germany.,Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, Germany
| | - Samy Unser
- Section for Hospital Hygiene and Environmental Health, Center for Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nico T Mutters
- Section for Hospital Hygiene and Environmental Health, Center for Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, Heidelberg, Germany.,Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Bonn, Germany
| | - Martin Scherrer
- Infection Control Engineering, Center for Infectious Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
Cho SJ. Endoscopes that Complete Pre-Cleaning may be Stored Overnight until Next Morning for the Subsequent Reprocessing. Clin Endosc 2021; 54:449-450. [PMID: 34233404 PMCID: PMC8357576 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2021.135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Soo-Jeong Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Peng CL, Liu TC, Wang HP, Chang WK. Two novel protocols for cleaning residual simethicone and fluid in patient-ready duodenoscopes. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36:1843-1850. [PMID: 33274470 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Approximately 42-95% of working channels have been reported to show the presence of residual fluid despite endoscope reprocessing. The aim of this study was to design two novel protocols for cleaning residual simethicone and demonstrate its efficiency by evaluating the residual fluid and cleanliness in the working channels of patient-ready duodenoscopes. METHODS The designed protocol for cleaning residual simethicone was implemented in manual cleaning and/or high-level disinfection (HLD). The residual fluid inside the working channels was estimated by visual inspection. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) values were evaluated to determine cleanliness after manual cleaning. RESULTS Manual cleaning with novel simethicone cleaning protocol demonstrated a significant decrease in fluid droplets (14.6 ± 29.9 vs 0 ± 0, P < 0.001) and ATP values (157 ± 196 relative light units [RLUs] vs 52 ± 41 RLUs, P = 0.031). HLD with simethicone cleaning protocol, using either enzymatic detergent with effective for cleaning simethicone or cleaning time set in the automatic endoscope reprocessor program for 8 min, demonstrated significant decrease in the number of fluid droplets. Follow-up after the implementation of the simethicone cleaning protocol showed a significant decrease in fluid droplets (37.4 ± 41.0 vs 2.1 ± 5.5, P = 0.003) and ATP values (271 ± 268 RLUs vs 82 ± 136 RLUs, P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS Simethicone cleaning protocol is advantageous for significantly decreasing fluid droplets and ATP values within endoscope working channels. After manual cleaning with the simethicone cleaning protocol, in particular, no retained fluid droplet was observed in patient-ready duodenoscopes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Ling Peng
- Department of Integrated Diagnostics and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tao-Chieh Liu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Po Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Kuo Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Memel ZN, Flynn DJ, Hernandez-Barco Y, Visrodia KH, Casey B, Krishnan K. Infectious Transmission from Savary Dilators is Uncommon: Retrospective Review from a Large Tertiary Academic Center. Clin Endosc 2021; 55:691-694. [PMID: 34182748 PMCID: PMC9539286 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2021.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe N Memel
- Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, USA
| | - Duncan J Flynn
- Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, USA
| | - Yasmin Hernandez-Barco
- Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.,Divison of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kavel Harish Visrodia
- Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.,Divison of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brenna Casey
- Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.,Divison of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kumar Krishnan
- Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.,Divison of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ehrlich D, Muthusamy VR. Device profile of the EXALT Model D single-use duodenoscope for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: overview of its safety and efficacy. Expert Rev Med Devices 2021; 18:421-427. [PMID: 33855920 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1917990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: The management of pancreaticobiliary disorders relies heavily on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, which is performed with a duodenoscope. Bacterial colonization of reusable duodenoscopes leading to subsequent infectious outbreaks is well recognized and remains an issue despite efforts to optimize best practices in high-level disinfection. The EXALT Model D duodenoscope (EXALT) (Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA) is a single-use device, designed to achieve technical equivalency with reusable devices while eliminating the potential for device-related outbreaks.Areas covered: This review covers the challenges associated with reprocessing duodenoscopes and the development of duodenoscope-related infections, with an emphasis on the use of single-use duodenoscopes as a potential solution to this issue.Expert Opinion: Duodenoscope-related infections are an increasingly recognized problem. Infectious outbreaks harm patients, significantly affect providers and medical centers, and can erode patient trust in the health-care system. Single-use duodenoscopes eliminate both the risk of device-related infection transmission and the need for burdensome duodenoscope reprocessing. In clinical evaluations, the EXALT device has demonstrated an equivalent technical performance and provider satisfaction compared to reusable duodenoscopes. Increasing use of this device will clarify how it compares to reusable duodenoscopes in a variety of clinical settings among endoscopists of varying skills levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dean Ehrlich
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - V Raman Muthusamy
- Medical Director of Endoscopy, UCLA Health System, Professor of Clinical Medicine, Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Trindade AJ, Copland A, Bhatt A, Bucobo JC, Chandrasekhara V, Krishnan K, Parsi MA, Kumta N, Law R, Pannala R, Rahimi EF, Saumoy M, Trikudanathan G, Yang J, Lichtenstein DR. Single-use duodenoscopes and duodenoscopes with disposable end caps. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:997-1005. [PMID: 33712228 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Multidrug-resistant infectious outbreaks associated with duodenoscopes have been documented internationally. Single-use duodenoscopes, disposable distal ends, or distal end cap sealants could eliminate or reduce exogenous patient-to-patient infection associated with ERCP. METHODS This document reviews technologies that have been developed to help reduce or eliminate exogenous infections because of duodenoscopes. RESULTS Four duodenoscopes with disposable end caps, 1 end sheath, and 2 disposable duodenoscopes are reviewed in this document. The evidence regarding their efficacy in procedural success rates, reduction of duodenoscope bacterial contamination, clinical outcomes associated with these devices, safety, and the financial considerations are discussed. CONCLUSIONS Several technologies discussed in this document are anticipated to eliminate or reduce exogenous infections during endoscopy requiring a duodenoscope. Although disposable duodenoscopes can eliminate exogenous ERCP-related risk of infection, data regarding effectiveness are needed outside of expert centers. Additionally, with more widespread adoption of these new technologies, more data regarding functionality, medical economics, and environmental impact will accrue. Disposable distal end caps facilitate duodenoscope reprocessing; postmarketing surveillance culture studies and real-life patient infection analyses are important areas of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arvind J Trindade
- Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Copland
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Amit Bhatt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Juan Carlos Bucobo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Vinay Chandrasekhara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kumar Krishnan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mansour A Parsi
- Section for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Nikhil Kumta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ryan Law
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Rahul Pannala
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Erik F Rahimi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Baylor Scott & White Health, Lakeway, Texas, USA
| | - Monica Saumoy
- Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Guru Trikudanathan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Julie Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - David R Lichtenstein
- Division of Gastroenterology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Nerandzic M, Antloga K, Litto C, Robinson N. Efficacy of flexible endoscope drying using novel endoscope test articles that allow direct visualization of the internal channel systems. Am J Infect Control 2021; 49:614-621. [PMID: 32890550 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.08.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thorough drying of flexible endoscope channels has been identified as an essential reprocessing step. Yet, instructions are not specific on how to dry endoscopes. There is lack of data supporting efficacy of current drying practices, due to limitations in determining channel dryness. METHODS Novel endoscope test articles were used to evaluate the effectiveness of alcohol flush and hanging in an ambient endoscope storage cabinet. Prepared test articles were hung in a storage cabinet for 5 days and visually inspected for residual liquid. The procedure for preoperative inspection of endoscopic systems was performed to determine the procedure's efficacy for removing residual liquid. Then, testing was performed to assess the impact of pressure, residual liquid type and route of air application on time to dry using compressed air. RESULTS Alcohol flush followed by hanging in an ambient storage cabinet was not effective for drying endoscope channels, and residual liquid was not completely removed after performing the steps of the preoperative inspection of endoscopic channels. The factors impacting effective compressed air drying were channel dependent. For some channels, alcohol increased the time to dry. CONCLUSIONS Endoscope drying is complex; borescope evaluation does not ensure a dry device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Nerandzic
- Advanced Sterilization Group, Research and Development, STERIS Corporation, Mentor, OH.
| | - Kathleen Antloga
- Advanced Sterilization Group, Research and Development, STERIS Corporation, Mentor, OH
| | - Christine Litto
- Advanced Sterilization Group, Research and Development, STERIS Corporation, Mentor, OH
| | - Nancy Robinson
- Advanced Sterilization Group, Research and Development, STERIS Corporation, Mentor, OH
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
STANDARDS OF INFECTION PREVENTION IN REPROCESSING FLEXIBLE GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPES. Gastroenterol Nurs 2021; 43:E142-E158. [PMID: 32487962 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
38
|
Microbiological Surveillance of Endoscopes in a Southern Italian Transplantation Hospital: A Retrospective Study from 2016 to 2019. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18063057. [PMID: 33809670 PMCID: PMC8002344 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18063057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopes are medical instruments that are used routinely in health structures. Due to their invasive nature and contact with many patients, they may cause hospital-acquired infections if not disinfected correctly. To ensure a high-level disinfection procedure or reprocessing, since the methods currently adopted in our institute are adequate, we evaluated retrospectively the presence of microorganisms in our endoscopes after reprocessing. Microbiological surveillance was performed from January 2016 to December 2019 in the instruments in use in our endoscopic room after reprocessing. In total, 35 endoscopes (3 duodenoscopes, 3 echoendoscopes, 12 bronchoscopes, 5 colonoscopes, and 12 gastroscopes) were evaluated for the presence of microorganisms, including multidrug-resistant pathogens and indicator microorganisms (IMOs). Our procedures were in agreement with an internal protocol based on Italian, international, and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations. Of a total of 811 samples, 799 (98.5%) complied with the regulatory guidelines, while 9 (1.1%) were positive for IMOs, and 3 (0.4%) displayed more than 10 colony-forming units (CFU) of environmental and commensal pathogens. Our results show that the internal reprocessing protocol is very efficient, leading to a very low number of observed contaminations, and it could be easily implemented by other health facilities that face a huge number of hospital-acquired infections due to incorrectly disinfected endoscopes.
Collapse
|
39
|
Zhang N, Guo J, Liu L, Wu H, Gu J. Study on the Efficacy of Peracetic Acid Disinfectant (Type III) on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Disinfection. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2021; 31:395-398. [PMID: 33710104 PMCID: PMC8360655 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the disinfection efficacy of peracetic acid disinfectant (Type III) on gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS Endoscopes were disinfected, respectively, by 2% glutaraldehyde and peracetic acid disinfectant (Type III) according to the procedures stipulated by the 2016 version of "Regulation for cleaning and disinfection technique of flexible endoscope," then samples were collected through biopsy channel at the specified steps. The bacterial count and pathogenic bacteria of these samples were detected, and hepatitis B virus surface antigen, hepatitis C virus antibody, and Treponemiapallidum antibody were detected by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay in peracetic acid disinfectant (Type III) group. The samples from the peracetic acid disinfectant (Type III) group were collected for 5 days continuously. RESULTS In total, 56 gastroscopes and 16 colonoscopes were disinfected by 2% glutaraldehyde (GA Group), 46 gastroscopes, and 15 colonoscopes were disinfected by peracetic acid disinfectant (Type III) (PAA Group). After disinfection, the bacterial count was significantly reduced in the 2 groups (P<0.05). In terms of the qualified rate of gastroscopes and total qualified rate, the PAA Group was better than GA Group [the qualified rate of gastroscopes: 97.83% (45/46) vs. 92.86% (52/56), P>0.05; total qualified rate: 98.36% (60/61) vs. 94.44% (68/72), P>0.05], the qualified rate of colonoscopes in the 2 groups were both 100.00% (15/15, 16/16). After disinfecting by peracetic acid disinfectant (Type III), hepatitis B virus surface antigen, anti-hepatitis C virus, and Treponemiapallidum antibody were negative. In term of colonies number detected for 5 days continuously, there was no significant difference at different collection steps (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Peracetic acid disinfectant (Type III) can be well applied to clinical with meeting the standard of high-level disinfection for gastrointestinal endoscopy, and after disinfecting by peracetic acid disinfectant (Type III), there was no obvious bacterial residue in the biopsy channel.
Collapse
|
40
|
Casini B, Tuvo B, Marciano E, Del Magro G, Gemignani G, Luchini G, Cristina ML, Costa AL, Arzilli G, Totaro M, Baggiani A, Privitera G. Improving the Reprocessing Quality of Flexible Thermolabile Endoscopes: How to Learn from Mistakes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:2482. [PMID: 33802350 PMCID: PMC7967619 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background: Failure in the reprocessing of thermolabile flexible endoscopes has been reported as one of the most important threats to patient health. Method: A case report and observational study was conducted, from August 2014 to December 2019, in the Digestive Endoscopy Unit of a University Hospital in Italy, where two cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography were observed. Following the risk/safety management practices, an epidemiological investigation was started, duodenoscopes were removed from use and the reprocessing practices reviewed. Moreover, microbiological surveillance of endoscopes was carried out according to the CDC guidelines. Results: In the first phase of sampling, 10/10 (100%) endoscopes were found to be non-compliant, of which 7 showed results for high-concern organisms (HCOs), such as KPC-K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and E. coli. After implementing corrective actions, 12 out of 17 endoscopes were found to be non-compliant (70.5%), of which 8 showed results for HCOs, such as KPC-K. oxytoca and P. aeruginosa. During the last year of regular microbiological surveillance, only 23% of endoscopes (35/152) were found to be non-compliant, of which 7 showed results for HCOs, such as NDM-K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii. The crucial issues were related to samples collected from the internal channels of duodenoscopes. Conclusion: Managing the risk associated with the reprocessing of digestive endoscopes, through risk assessment at every stage of the process, is important for the prevention of infections associated with the use of these device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Casini
- Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (B.T.); (A.L.C.); (G.A.); (M.T.); (A.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Benedetta Tuvo
- Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (B.T.); (A.L.C.); (G.A.); (M.T.); (A.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Emanuele Marciano
- Endoscopy Service Division, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (E.M.); (G.D.M.)
| | - Giuliana Del Magro
- Endoscopy Service Division, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (E.M.); (G.D.M.)
| | - Giulia Gemignani
- Medical Direction, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (G.G.); (G.L.)
| | - Grazia Luchini
- Medical Direction, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (G.G.); (G.L.)
| | | | - Anna Laura Costa
- Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (B.T.); (A.L.C.); (G.A.); (M.T.); (A.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Guglielmo Arzilli
- Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (B.T.); (A.L.C.); (G.A.); (M.T.); (A.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Michele Totaro
- Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (B.T.); (A.L.C.); (G.A.); (M.T.); (A.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Angelo Baggiani
- Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (B.T.); (A.L.C.); (G.A.); (M.T.); (A.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Gaetano Privitera
- Department of Translational Research, New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (B.T.); (A.L.C.); (G.A.); (M.T.); (A.B.); (G.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Shin R, Lee S, Han KS, Sohn DK, Moon SH, Choi DH, Kye BH, Son HJ, Lee SI, Si S, Kang WK. Guidelines for accreditation of endoscopy units: quality measures from the Korean Society of Coloproctology. Ann Surg Treat Res 2021; 100:154-165. [PMID: 33748029 PMCID: PMC7943281 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.3.154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Colonoscopy is an effective method of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC), and it can prevent CRC by detection and removal of precancerous lesions. The most important considerations when performing colonoscopy screening are the safety and satisfaction of the patient and the diagnostic accuracy. Accordingly, the Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP) herein proposes an optimal level of standard performance to be used in endoscopy units and by individual colonoscopists for screening colonoscopy. These guidelines establish specific criteria for assessment of safety and quality in screening colonoscopy. Methods The Colonoscopy Committee of the KSCP commissioned this Position Statement. Expert gastrointestinal surgeons representing the KSCP reviewed the published evidence to identify acceptable quality indicators and indicators that lacked sufficient evidence. Results The KSCP recommends an optimal standard list for quality control of screening colonoscopy in the following 6 categories: training and competency of the colonoscopist, procedural quality, facilities and equipment, performance indicators and auditable outcomes, disinfection of equipment, and sedation and recovery of the patient. Conclusion The KSCP recommends that endoscopy units performing CRC screening evaluate 6 key performance measures during daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rumi Shin
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea.,Department of Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seongdae Lee
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung-Su Han
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Dae Kyung Sohn
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hui Moon
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Hyun Choi
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Bong-Hyeon Kye
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Hae-Jung Son
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Il Lee
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Sumin Si
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea
| | - Won-Kyung Kang
- The Colonoscopy Committee, The Korean Society of Coloproctology (KSCP), Seoul, Korea.,Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Chen S, Liu T, Lai H, Chang H, Yen H. Monthly endoscopy surveillance culture facilitates detection of breaches in the scope reprocessing procedure: 5‐year experience in an endoscopy center. ADVANCES IN DIGESTIVE MEDICINE 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/aid2.13251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Shu‐Hui Chen
- Endoscopy Center, Division of Gastroenterology Changhua Christian Hospital Changhua Taiwan
| | - Theophile Liu
- Center for Infection Prevention and Control Changhua Christian Healthcare System Changhua Taiwan
| | - Huei‐Wen Lai
- Center for Infection Prevention and Control Changhua Christian Healthcare System Changhua Taiwan
| | - Hui‐Lan Chang
- General Education Center Chienkuo Technology University Changhua Taiwan
| | - Hsu‐Heng Yen
- Endoscopy Center, Division of Gastroenterology Changhua Christian Hospital Changhua Taiwan
- General Education Center Chienkuo Technology University Changhua Taiwan
- College of Medicine Chung Shan Medical University Taichung Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Since the first fiberoptic instruments, gastrointestinal endoscopy has shaped the field of gastroenterology and is now a key diagnostic and therapeutic tool. Compared with the initial fiberoptic endoscopes state-of-the-art optical chips (or charge-coupled device technology) allowed a quantum leap in image quality. Despite these advances, gastrointestinal endoscopy is far from being perfect. The diagnostic yield (eg, for adenoma detection rates) is highly operator dependent and there is still the need for sedation or even anesthesia to address discomfort during the procedure. Despite highly standardized cleaning and high-level disinfection the reuse of contemporary (and difficult to clean) endoscopes with multiple channels exposes patients to the risk of transmission of infections. Artificial intelligence and pattern recognition should eliminate interindividual variability including polyp detection rates, self-propelled, and (potentially remotely controlled) scopes with a soft shaft could reduce the discomfort during procedures and abolish the need for sedation and anesthesia altogether and single-use designs should eliminate the risk of patient-to-patient transmission of infections. While these innovations are feasible and could be implemented rapidly utilizing available technology, they require a paradigm shift affecting all levels of the value chain from the supplier of the instruments to the end-users. Some may negate the need for a paradigm shift, but it is evident that a major redesign of the endoscopic equipment is overdue to fully utilize novel technologies and most importantly ensure the best possible outcomes for patients.
Collapse
|
44
|
Day LW, Kwok K, Visrodia K, Petersen BT. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Infection Control Summit: updates, challenges, and the future of infection control in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:1-10. [PMID: 32819676 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lukejohn W Day
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Karl Kwok
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kavel Visrodia
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bret T Petersen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Chua T, Halim N, Reicher S. Recent Advances in Endoscope Disinfection: Where Do We Stand in the COVID era? TECHNIQUES AND INNOVATIONS IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 2021; 23:190-198. [PMID: 33103131 PMCID: PMC7571422 DOI: 10.1016/j.tige.2020.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Over 16 million cases worldwide, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has profoundly affected healthcare as we know it. Given reports of gastrointestinal involvement and viral shedding in the stool, it is unsurprising there are concerns that endoscopic equipment may be a potential vector of viral transmission. Here, we provide an overview of existing practices for endoscope reprocessing, recent developments in the field, and challenges in the COVID-19 environment. Current multi-society guidelines do not advise any change to endoscope disinfection protocols but emphasize strict adherence to recommended practices. However, endoscopy reprocessing staff may benefit from supplemental personal protective equipment measures, especially in high risk situations. Because thorough endoscope reprocessing is highly operator dependent, adequate training of personnel is critical for proper manual cleaning and disinfection of endoscopes that have potential to harbor virus. Bacterial contamination of duodenoscopes has caused outbreaks of infection from multidrug-resistant organisms, highlighting vulnerable areas. The emphasis of current studies is on optimization of disinfection and drying, minimization of simethicone use, and on quality control of endoscope reprocessing with sampling and microbiological culturing. Recent advances include novel approaches to endoscope sterilization, infection barrier methods, and design of partially or fully disposable duodenoscopes. Overall, the available data indicate that, when correctly executed, current reprocessing practices are sufficient in preventing SARS-COV-2 transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Chua
- Division of Gastroenterology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, University of California, 21840 South Normandie Ave., Suite 850, Torrance, California 90502
| | - Nasir Halim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, University of California, 21840 South Normandie Ave., Suite 850, Torrance, California 90502
| | - Sofiya Reicher
- Division of Gastroenterology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, University of California, 21840 South Normandie Ave., Suite 850, Torrance, California 90502
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Tian H, Sun J, Guo S, Zhu X, Feng H, Zhuang Y, Wang X. The Effectiveness of Drying on Residual Droplets, Microorganisms, and Biofilms in Gastrointestinal Endoscope Reprocessing: A Systematic Review. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2021; 2021:6615357. [PMID: 33927758 PMCID: PMC8049816 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6615357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite endoscope reprocessing, residual droplets remain in gastrointestinal endoscope working channels. Inadequate drying of gastrointestinal endoscope working channels may promote microbial reproduction and biofilm formation, increasing the risk of infection in patients. This review was designed to provide the current status of gastrointestinal endoscope drying, emphasize the importance of gastrointestinal endoscope drying, and evaluate the effectiveness of different drying methods of gastrointestinal endoscope in reducing residual droplets and microbial growth risk. METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting checklist. The PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO, CNKI, CQVIP, and Wanfang Data databases were searched from 2010 to 2020 to identify eligible articles focused on methods of gastrointestinal endoscope drying and the status of endoscope drying. The following key points were analyzed: type of intervention, amount of residual droplets, major microbial types, and effectiveness of biofilm intervention. JBI quality assessment tool was used to determine bias risk for inclusion in the article. RESULTS This review included twelve articles. Two of the articles reported lack of drying of gastrointestinal endoscopes while the other ten reported residual droplets, microbial growth, and biofilm formation after different methods of drying. Four articles reported 0 to 4.55 residual droplets; four articles reported that the main microbial types were cocci and bacilli, most commonly Staphylococcus, Escherichia coli, Bacillus maltophilia, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; and two reported that drying could effectively reduce biofilm regeneration. The type of intervention is as follows: automatic endoscopy reprocessor (AER), manual compressed air drying, and the Dri-Scope Aid for automatic drying and drying cabinet. CONCLUSIONS While endoscope reprocessing may not always be effective, an automatic endoscope reprocessor plus the Dri-Scope Aid with automatic drying over 10 min or storage in a drying cabinet for 72 h may be preferred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hefeng Tian
- 1The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jiao Sun
- 2School of Nursing, Jilin University, No. 965 Xinjiang Street, Changchun, Jilin Province 130021, China
| | - Shaoning Guo
- 1The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Xuanrui Zhu
- 1The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Han Feng
- 1The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yijin Zhuang
- 1The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Xiu Wang
- 1The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Saleem N, Ismail MK, Tombazzi CR, Soin S, Dhruva SS. Endoscopic transmission of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: implications for U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and postmarket surveillance of endoscopic devices. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:231-238. [PMID: 32750323 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Since the first widely reported case cluster of duodenoscope-associated transmission of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in 2013 that affected 38 patients, similar outbreaks have occurred throughout the world. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, professional gastroenterology societies, and endoscope manufacturers have taken multiple steps to address this issue. Unlike prior outbreaks attributed to lapses in cleaning and reprocessing, transmission and outbreaks have continued to occur despite compliance with current reprocessing guidelines. A definitive method of duodenoscope reprocessing remains elusive, and the FDA recently recommended transition to new designs with disposable components that do not require reprocessing. The first fully disposable duodenoscope received FDA clearance as a "breakthrough" device in December 2019. Although the human, microbiologic, and endoscopic design factors responsible for infectious transmissions and disinfecting techniques to avoid them have been examined, discussion has not included the critical role of FDA regulation of duodenoscopes through the 510(k) clearance pathway and the mechanisms of postmarket surveillance, including adverse event reporting. We present an overview of the FDA approval of duodenoscopes by analyzing the FDA's 510(k) premarket notification database for data supporting clearance of duodenoscope models implicated in CRE-related outbreaks as well as subsequently required postmarket studies. We address the policy implications of CRE outbreaks on postmarketing surveillance and the need for increased gastroenterologist involvement in the life cycle of duodenoscopes and other medical devices. This includes reporting thorough adverse event data to the FDA and device manufacturers, supporting active surveillance studies to ensure safety and effectiveness, and evaluating implementation of recommendations to reduce adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasir Saleem
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
| | - Mohammad K Ismail
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Claudio R Tombazzi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sarthak Soin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sanket S Dhruva
- Department of Medicine, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, and Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Exner M, Bhattacharya S, Gebel J, Goroncy-Bermes P, Hartemann P, Heeg P, Ilschner C, Kramer A, Ling ML, Merkens W, Oltmanns P, Pitten F, Rotter M, Schmithausen RM, Sonntag HG, Steinhauer K, Trautmann M. Chemical disinfection in healthcare settings: critical aspects for the development of global strategies. GMS HYGIENE AND INFECTION CONTROL 2020; 15:Doc36. [PMID: 33520601 PMCID: PMC7818848 DOI: 10.3205/dgkh000371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Chemical disinfection is an indispensable means of preventing infection. This holds true for healthcare settings, but also for all other settings where transmission of pathogens poses a potential health risk to humans and/or animals. Research on how to ensure effectiveness of disinfectants and the process of disinfection, as well as on when, how and where to implement disinfection precautions is an ongoing challenge requiring an interdisciplinary team effort. The valuable resources of active substances used for disinfection must be used wisely and their interaction with the target organisms and the environment should be evaluated and monitored closely, if we are to reliable reap the benefits of disinfection in future generations. In view of the global threat of communicable diseases and emerging and re-emerging pathogens and multidrug-resistant pathogens, the relevance of chemical disinfection is continually increasing. Although this consensus paper pinpoints crucial aspects for strategies of chemical disinfection in terms of the properties of disinfectant agents and disinfection practices in a particularly vulnerable group and setting, i.e., patients in healthcare settings, it takes a comprehensive, holistic approach to do justice to the complexity of the topic of disinfection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Exner
- Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Bonn University, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Jürgen Gebel
- Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Bonn University, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Philippe Hartemann
- Departement Environnement et Santé Publique S.E.R.E.S., Faculté de Médecine, Nancy, France
| | - Peter Heeg
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Carola Ilschner
- Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, Bonn University, Bonn, Germany
| | - Axel Kramer
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany
| | - Moi Lin Ling
- Infection Prevention & Control, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | - Frank Pitten
- IKI – Institut für Krankenhaushygiene & Infektionskontrolle GmbH, Gießen, Germany
| | | | | | - Hans-Günther Sonntag
- Institute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Review of Duodenoscope Infection Prevention Practices at the Medical University of South Carolina. Gastroenterol Nurs 2020; 43:E214-E216. [PMID: 33055545 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
A rise in duodenoscope-associated infections, especially in regard to multidrug-resistant organisms, has led to an increase in scrutiny regarding duodenoscope reprocessing. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography scopes have a specialized elevator wire channel, allowing more flexible duct cannulation; however, this channel can be difficult to reprocess with standard techniques. Although strict adherence to manufacturer reprocessing protocols remains the primary means of infection prevention, periodic microbiological surveillance is a Food and Drug Administration-recommended practice that the Medical University of South Carolina has implemented to further prevent duodenoscope-associated infections. The Medical University of South Carolina obtains 2 separate cultures from 2 duodenoscopes every 2 months, which undergo standard speciation and sensitivity and are returned to use once negative at 48 hours. The initial results of the Medical University of South Carolina's surveillance cultures are negative for any multidrug-resistant organisms; however, other centers should consider implementing surveillance cultures into their reprocessing practices and closely monitoring for future endoscope infection prevention modalities.
Collapse
|
50
|
Barakat MT, Banerjee S. Novel Algorithms for Reprocessing, Drying and Storing Endoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2020; 30:677-691. [PMID: 32891225 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
After outbreaks of duodenoscope-transmitted infection with multidrug-resistant organisms, it has become clear that institutions must optimize their endoscope reprocessing programs. Standard endoscope reprocessing practices may not represent the ideal approach for preventing transmission of infection related to endoscopy. We discuss multiple approaches to enhance and optimize reprocessing, drying, and storage of standard duodenoscopes. The optimal enhanced duodenoscope reprocessing modality remains to be determined. Acknowledging the challenges and limitations in effectively reprocessing duodenoscopes, the FDA issued a safety communiqué recommending transitioning to either single use disposable duodenoscopes or duodenoscopes with innovative designs that allow more effective reprocessing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique T Barakat
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Subhas Banerjee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|