BACCHUS: A randomised non-comparative phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)

Novel radiation and targeted therapy combinations for improving rectal cancer outcomes

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used as standard treatment for rectal cancer. However, response rates are variable and survival outcomes remain poor, highlighting the need to develop new therapeutic strategies. Research is focused on identifying novel methods for sensitising rectal tumours to RT to enhance responses and improve patient outcomes. This can be achieved through harnessing tumour promoting effects of radiation or preventing development of radio-resistance in cancer cells. Many of the approaches being investigated involve targeting the recently published new dimensions of cancer hallmarks. This review article will discuss key radiation and targeted therapy combination strategies being investigated in the rectal cancer setting, with a focus on exploitation of mechanisms which target the hallmarks of cancer.

Neoadjuvant Modified FOLFOXIRI With Selective Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Long-term Outcomes of Phase II Study and Propensity-Score-Matched Comparison With Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant modified FOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) chemotherapy with selective radiotherapy did not compromise pathologic complete response and tumor downstaging in locally advanced rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to analyze disease-free survival and local recurrence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with modified FOLFOXIRI (mFOLFOXIRI).

DESIGN

This was a prospective single-arm phase II study. A propensity score-adjusted method was implemented to compare outcomes against historical controls of chemoradiotherapy.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at single institutions.

PATIENTS

One hundred 6 patients with stage II and III rectal cancers were included.

INTERVENTION

All patients received neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision. Patients with mesorectal fascia-positive or ycT4a/b after reevaluation with MRI received radiation before surgery. Otherwise, immediate total mesorectal excision would be performed.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

The primary end point was tumor downstaging (ypStage 0-I) rate, which was reported previously. Disease-free survival and local recurrence rate were the main outcomes for the current study.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 43.3 months, the 2-year disease-free survival rate was 85.6% and the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 78.9%. The local recurrence rate was 7.8% after surgery. After propensity score matching, 73 patients were available for comparison in each group. The pathologic complete response rate was 23.3% and 13.7% ( p = 0.14), the proportion of ypStage 0-I was 45.2% vs 39.7% ( p = 0.5), the 3-year disease-free survival was 87.6% vs 75.8% (HR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.95, p = 0.037). The local recurrence rate in the mFOLFOXIRI group was 5.5% and in the chemoradiotherapy group was 4.1% ( p = 0.70). Patients receiving mFOLFOXIRI had a lower incidence of anastomotic fistula compared with the chemoradiotherapy group (5.5% vs 17.8%, p = 0.02).

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-arm, nonrandomized phase II study.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI with selective radiotherapy was feasible and safe, and it improved 3-year disease-free survival compared with propensity score-matched historical controls who received chemoradiotherapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B989 .Trial registration: NCT02217020.

FOLFOXIRI MODIFICADO NEOADYUVANTE CON RADIOTERAPIA SELECTIVA EN CNCER DE RECTO LOCALMENTE AVANZADO RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO DEL ESTUDIO DE FASE II Y COMPARACIN EMPAREJADA POR PUNTUACIN DE PROPENSIN CON QUIMIORRADIOTERAPIA

ANTECEDENTES:La quimioterapia neoadyuvante con FOLFOXIRI modificado (ácido folínico, 5-fluoruracilo, oxaliplatino e irinotecan) con radioterapia selectiva no comprometió la respuesta patológica completa ni la reducción del estadio del tumor en el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.OBJETIVO:El estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar la sobrevida libre de enfermedad y la recurrencia local de la quimioterapia neoadyuvante con FOLFOXIRI modificado (mFOLFOXIRI).DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio prospectivo de fase II de un solo brazo. Se implementó un método ajustado por puntaje de propensión para comparar los resultados con los controles históricos de quimiorradioterapia.ESCENARIO:El estudio se realizó en instituciones individuales.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron 106 pacientes con cáncer de recto en estadio II y III.INTERVENCIÓN:Todos los pacientes recibieron quimioterapia neoadyuvante con mFOLFOXIRI antes de la escisión total del mesorrecto. Los pacientes con fascia mesorrectal positiva o ycT4a/b después de la reevaluación con MRI recibirían radiación antes de la cirugía. En caso contrario, se realizaría una escisión mesorrectal total inmediata.PRINCIPALES RESULTADOS Y MEDIDAS:El criterio principal de valoración fue la tasa de disminución del estadio del tumor (ypEstadio 0-I), que se informó anteriormente. La sobrevida libre de enfermedad y la tasa de recurrencia local son los principales resultados del estudio actual.RESULTADOS:Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 43,3 meses, las tasas de sobrevida libre de enfermedad a 2 y 3 años fueron del 85,6 % y 78,9 %, respectivamente. La tasa de recidiva local fue del 7,8% tras la cirugía. Después del emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión, 73 pacientes estaban disponibles para la comparación en cada grupo. La tasa de respuesta patológica completa fue de 23,3 % y de 13,7 % (p = 0,14), la proporción de ypEstadio 0-I fue del 45,2 % frente al 39,7 % (p = 0,5), la SLE a los 3 años fue del 87,6 % frente al 75,8 % (HR = 0,46, IC del 95 % 0,22-0,95, p = 0,037) y la tasa de recurrencia local fue del 5,5 % y del 4,1 % (p = 0,70) en el grupo de mFOLFOXIRI frente al grupo de quimiorradioterapia, respectivamente. Los pacientes que recibieron mFOLFOXIRI tuvieron una menor incidencia de fístula anastomótica en comparación con el grupo de quimiorradioterapia (5,5 % frente a 17,8 %, p = 0,02).LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio de fase II no aleatorizado de un solo brazo.CONCLUSIONES:El mFOLFOXIRI neoadyuvante con radioterapia selectiva fue factible y seguro, y mejoró la SSE a los 3 años en comparación con los controles históricos emparejados por puntaje de propensión que recibieron quimiorradioterapia. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B989 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

A phase II study of neoadjuvant capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (XELOXIRI) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Purpose

Addition of perioperative multi-agent chemotherapy to the treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) may be a promising option. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin and irinotecan (XELOXIRI) as triplet neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with LARC.

Methods

Patients received neoadjuvant irinotecan and oxaliplatin and capecitabine and then underwent total mesorectal excision. The primary study endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate.

Results

Between June 2013 and December 2016, 55 patients were enrolled in the study. Forty-two (77.8%) of 54 completed the study protocol. The pCR rate was 7.7% (95% CI 3.0% to 18.2%). The 3-year local recurrence rate was 3.9%, the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 77.3, and the 3-year overall survival rate was 96.0%.

Conclusion

XELOXIRI neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to be feasible and efficacious for patients with LARC. Although neoadjuvant XELOXIRI alone did not yield our expected pCR rate, the local recurrence rate, 3-year DFS, and measures of safety met current standards.

A randomized controlled trial comparing perioperative vs. postoperative mFOLFOX6 for lower rectal cancer with suspected lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis (JCOG1310): a phase II/III randomized controlled trial

Objective

The optimal perioperative chemotherapy for lower rectal cancer with lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis remains unclear. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of perioperative mFOLFOX6 in comparison with postoperative mFOLFOX6 for rectal cancer patients undergoing total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection.

Methods

We conducted an open label randomized phase II/III trial in 18 Japanese institutions. We enrolled patients with histologically proven lower rectal adenocarcinoma with clinical pelvic lateral lymph node metastasis who were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive postoperative mFOLFOX6 (12 courses of intravenous oxaliplatin [85 mg/m²] with L-leucovorin [200 mg/m²] followed by 5-fluorouracil [400 mg/m², bolus and 2400 mg/m², continuous infusion, repeated every 2 weeks]) or perioperative mFOLFOX6 (six courses each preoperatively and postoperatively). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The trial is registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, number jRCTs031180230.

Results

Between May 2015, and May 2019, 48 patients were randomized to the postoperative arm (n = 26) and the perioperative arm (n = 22). The trial was terminated prematurely due to poor accrual. The 3-year OS in the postoperative and perioperative groups were 66.1 and 84.4%, respectively (HR 0.58, 95% CI [0.14–2.45], one-sided P = 0.23). The pathological complete response rate in the perioperative group was 9.1%. Grade 3 postoperative surgical complications were more frequently observed in the perioperative arm (50.0 vs. 12.0%). One treatment-related death due to sepsis from pelvic infection occurred in the postoperative group.

Conclusions

Perioperative mFOLFOX6 may be an insufficient treatment to improve survival of lower rectal cancer with lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis.

The Evolving Neoadjuvant Treatment Paradigm for Patients with Locoregional mismatch Repair Proficient Rectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

The standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has included preoperative chemoradiation, total mesorectal excision surgery and post operative adjuvant chemotherapy based on histopathology. The current therapeutic landscape in LARC has many different options with different directions of travel - depending on the goal of treatment. Enthusiasm for delivering total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is increasing in the light of recently published randomised phase III trials - RAPIDO and PRODIGE-23. There is a wide diversity of different potential schedules and a multitude of approaches, which include induction neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with a range of chemotherapy options (CAPEOX, FOLFOX, FOLFOXIRI) and a varying duration of 6-18 weeks, or consolidation NACT. These schedules either precede or follow short-course preoperative radiation therapy (SCPRT) using 5 × 5Gy or long-course chemoradiation (LCCRT) using 45-60Gy respectively. The different strategies of induction and consolidation neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been compared and have similar long-term outcomes, but consolidation chemotherapy may facilitate organ-sparing. The results are driving novel paradigms with both intensification and de-intensification treatment strategies. The ideal combination, sequence or duration of such a TNT approach remains undefined. As yet, there are no robust clinical, genetic, molecular, immune or imaging features (alone or integrated), which either direct or aid these choices. Currently, the selection of neoadjuvant treatment is driven by the impact on avoidance or feasibility of surgery or reducing the risk of metastases rather than prevention of local recurrence. Most believe that TNT will improve overall survival, despite the present lack of evidence. Both the inherent heterogeneity in LARC and the observed range of different responses underline the need for response biomarkers to individually tailor therapy rather than 'a one size fits all' approach.

Feasibility and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy without Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study explored the feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) without radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage of T3-T4 and/or N-positive LARC patients were included. We retrospectively analyzed patients' NAC-related and perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 30 patients. mFOLFOX6 or SOX plus cetuximab was administered to 12 patients with the wild-type RAS gene and FOLFOXIRI or SOXIRI to 18 patients with mutant-type RAS. The NAC completion rate was 90.0%. All patients underwent total mesorectal excision, and 29 patients underwent combined bilateral lateral lymph node dissection. The R0 operation rate was 90.0%. Although the postoperative complication rate was 40%, no complications were associated with NAC. The response rate of NAC and the proportion of histological anti-tumor effect grade ≥ 2 were 56.7% and 46.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

NAC was considered to be a safe, feasible treatment option for LARC.

Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: What We Learned in the Last Two Decades and the Future Perspectives

The advancement in surgical techniques, optimization of systemic chemoradiotherapy, and development of refined diagnostic and imaging modalities have brought a phenomenal shift in the treatment of the locally advanced rectal cancer. Although each therapeutic option has shown substantial progress in their field, it is finding their ideal amalgamation which has baffled the clinician and researchers alike. In the effort to identifying the perfect salutary treatment plan, we have even shifted our attention from the trimodal approach to non-operative "watchful waiting" to more recent individualized care. In this article, we acknowledge the scientific progress in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer and compare the opportunities as well as the obstacles while implementing them clinically. We also explore the current challenges and controversies surrounding the multidisciplinary approach and highlight the new trends and recent advances with an ultimate goal to improve the patients' quality of life.

The concept and use of the neoadjuvant rectal score as a composite endpoint in rectal cancer

There is no universally accepted instrument to use as a validated surrogate endpoint for overall survival in phase 2 and phase 3 multimodal rectal cancer trials using chemoradiotherapy. Efforts are hampered by the inaccuracy of clinical TNM staging, the variability of indications for neoadjuvant treatment, and diverse definitions of tumour regression grade. Pathological complete response is commonly used, but fails to capture information from the majority of patients. The neoadjuvant rectal score categorises response and downstaging from the entire trial population to identify whether or not a novel treatment group in a chemoradiation trial is superior by predicting overall survival outcomes. Additionally, the neoadjuvant rectal score assesses the difference between initial clinical and pathological T stage and the presence or absence of nodal involvement after treatment. The neoadjuvant rectal score has been conceptually, but incompletely, statistically validated by two independent trial datasets. However, a fundamental weakness of the score is that no preoperative phase 3 trials in locally advanced rectal cancer in the past 20 years have provided a significant benefit in overall survival to statistically validate the neoadjuvant rectal score as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival. We review the robustness, practical value, applicability, generalisability, advantages, and disadvantages of the neoadjuvant rectal score as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival and recommend how this score could be improved and be acceptable as a standard endpoint in studies investigating neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer.

Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

Background and purpose

With the advent of more intensive chemotherapy regimens, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has always been questioned due to its inevitable radiation toxicity. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and NACRT.

Materials and methods

Eligible studies were searched using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to 31 July 2020, comparing the clinical efficacy of NAC versus NACRT for LARC. Short- and long-term outcomes were determined using the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Six studies with 12,812 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis, including 677 patients in the NAC group and 12,135 patients in the NACRT group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of pathological complete response rate (OR=0.62, 95%CI=0.27~1.41), N down-staging rate (OR=1.20, 95%CI=0.25~5.79), R0 resection rate (OR=1.24, 95%CI=0.78~1.98), and local relapse rate (OR=1.12, 95%CI=0.58~2.14). The pooled OR for the total response rate and T down-staging were in favor of NACRT (OR=0.41, 95%CI=0.22~0.76 versus OR=0.67 95%CI=0.52~0.87). However, the pooled OR for the sphincter preservation rate favored NAC compared with NACRT (OR=1.87, 95%CI=1.24~2.81). Moreover, NAC was found to be superior to NACRT in terms of distant metastasis (14.3% vs. 20.4%), but the difference was not significant (OR=0.84, 95%CI=0.31~2.27).

Conclusion

We concluded that NAC was superior to NACRT in terms of the sphincter preservation rate, and non-inferior to NACRT in terms of pCR, N down-staging, R0 resection, local relapse, and distant metastasis. However, the conclusion warrants further validation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02251-0.

Total neoadjuvant therapy vs standard therapy of locally advanced rectal cancer with high-risk factors for failure

BACKGROUND

For locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), standard therapy [consisting of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (ChT)] achieves excellent local control. Unfortunately, survival is still poor due to distant metastases, which remains the leading cause of death among these patients. In recent years, the concept of total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has been developed, whereby all systemic ChT-mainly affecting micrometastases-is applied prior to surgery.

AIM

To compare standard therapy and total neoadjuvant therapy for LARC patients with high-risk factors for failure.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, we compared LARC patients with high-risk factors for failure who were treated with standard therapy or with TNT. High-risk for failure was defined according to the presence of at least one of the following factors: T4 stage; N2 stage; positive mesorectal fascia; extramural vascular invasion; positive lateral lymph node. TNT consisted of 12 wk of induction ChT with capecitabine and oxaliplatin or folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, CRT with capecitabine, and 6-8 wk of consolidation ChT with capecitabine and oxaliplatin or folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR). In total, 72 patients treated with standard therapy and 89 patients treated with TNT were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Compared to standard therapy, TNT showed a higher proportion of pCR (23% vs 7%; P = 0.01), a lower neoadjuvant rectal score (median: 8.43 vs 14.98; P < 0.05), higher T-and N-downstaging (70% and 94% vs 51% and 86%), equivalent R0 resection (95% vs 93%), shorter time to stoma closure (mean: 20 vs 33 wk; P < 0.05), higher compliance during systemic ChT (completed all cycles 87% vs 76%; P < 0.05), lower proportion of acute toxicity grade ≥ 3 during ChT (3% vs 14%, P < 0.05), and equivalent acute toxicity and compliance during CRT and in the postoperative period. The pCR rate in patients treated with TNT was significantly higher in patients irradiated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy/volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy than with 3D conformal radiotherapy (32% vs 9%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared to standard therapy, TNT provides better outcome for LARC patients with high-risk factors for failure, in terms of pCR and neoadjuvant rectal score.

Neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score: Value evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy and prognostic significance after surgery?

INTRODUCTION

The Neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score is a new surrogate endpoint to be used in clinical trials for early determination of treatment response to different preoperative therapies. The aim is to further validate the NAR-score, primarily developed using chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with a delay to surgery 6-8 weeks, and explore its value using other schedules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included all 9978 patients diagnosed with non-metastasized RC in 2007-2015 that had undergone surgery and was registered in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The patients of interest had either short-course radiotherapy (scRT)/CRT + delayed surgery, long-course radiotherapy (RT) + delayed surgery, (C)RT + additional chemotherapy, primary surgery, or scRT + immediate surgery. The scRT/CRT + delayed surgery groups were further divided based on time to surgery.

RESULTS

Mean NAR-score differed significantly (p < 0.0001) between different treatments. (C)RT + additional chemotherapy had the lowest mean score of 16.3 and CRT + delayed surgery had 17.7. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR) of patients with a Low NAR-score (<8) compared to those with a High score (>16) for both CRT- and scRT, with a stronger correlation for CRT-patients. C-index for the NAR-score model (0.623) was not superior to when only pathological T- and N-stage was used (0.646).

CONCLUSIONS

The NAR-score is prognostic, but it is not better than pT- and pN-stage. However, the NAR-score can still discriminate between two treatments that have different cell killing effect and may still be of value in clinical trials as an easier method than pT- and N-stage.

The efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) are more likely to suffer local recurrence and distant metastases, contributing to worse prognoses. Considering the provided dramatic reduction of local recurrences, neoadjuvant CRT (nCRT) followed by curative resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy has been established as standard therapy for LARC patients. However, the efficacy of adding bevacizumab in neoadjuvant therapy, especially in induction therapy-containing nCRT for LARC patients remains uncertain.

Materials

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to retrieve records on the application of bevacizumab in a neoadjuvant setting for LARC patients. The endpoints of interest were pCR and the rates of patients suffering Grade 3/4 bevacizumab-specific adverse events, namely bleeding, wound healing complications, and gastrointestinal perforation.

Results

29 cohorts covering 1134 subjects were included in this systematic review. The pooled pCR rate for bevacizumab-relevant cohorts was 21% (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 17–25%; I² = 61.8%), the pooled estimates of Grade 3/4 bleeding, Grade 3/4 wound healing complication, Grade 3/4 gastrointestinal perforation were 1% (95% CI, 0–3%; I² = 0%), 2% (95% CI, 1–5%; I² = 4.7%), and 2% (95% CI, 0–5%; I² = 0%), respectively.

Conclusion

The addition of bevacizumab in the nCRT, especially in the TNT, for LARC patients provides promising efficacy and acceptable safety. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the small amount of relevant data and need further confirmation by future studies.

What is the impact of systemic chemotherapy for lateral lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer?

PURPOSE

Systemic chemotherapy (SC) before surgery is a potential treatment to improve survival in patients with advanced rectal cancer. However, the impact of SC on lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) remains unclear.

METHODS

A total of 78 patients with stage II/III low rectal cancer, who received 3-month oxaliplatin-based SC followed by LLN dissection (LLND) in principle, were analysed retrospectively. "Total lateral lymph node metastases (tLLNMs)" was defined as having either pathological LLNMs (pLLNMs) or lateral local recurrences (LLRs). Patients with the maximum short-axis size of LLNs ≥ 7 mm were classified into the swollen group (n = 21).

RESULTS

In the total cohort, tLLNMs included 6 pLLNMs (7.7%) and 2 LLRs (2.6%). In the non-swollen group, no patients had pLLNMs, but one had LLR (1.8%). In the swollen group, pLLNMs and LLRs were detected in 6 (28.6%) and 1 (4.8%), respectively. The swollen group was an independent risk factor for tLLNMs (P < 0.001), leading to the significantly worse 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) of 52.4% than the others.

CONCLUSION

For patients without swollen LLNs, SC could allow for omission both of lateral irradiation and LLND. For patients with swollen LLNs, the lateral local control was favourable after SC and LLND without chemoradiotherapy (CRT); however, oxaliplatin-based SC might be insufficient to improve survival, requiring more intensive chemotherapy. CRT should be indicated according to the other risk factors of central local recurrence, although the swollen LLNs should be removed.

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy alone for the locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review

Neo-adjuvant chemoradiation (NA-CRT) is the standard of management for the locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), achieving very low rates of local recurrence (LR). However, NA-CRT fails to control distant recurrence and improve survival, whilst it is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and increased acute and late toxicity. In recent years, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACTx) appears in the literature as an alternative to NA-CRT in patients with LARC. In the present study, the authors review all current evidence on the specific subject. Following a systematic search of the literature, 25 studies were identified reporting on short- or long-term outcomes of NACTx for LARC. Seventeen studies were prospective or retrospective series, and 8 comparative. Of the comparative studies, one was a randomized control trial (RCT) comparing NACTx to NA-CRT and to the combination of NACTx/NA-CRT, and another a non-randomized study comparing NACTx to NA-CRT. Chemotherapeutic regimens were 5-fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin based. In some of them, irinotecan or/and bevacizumab was added. A pooled analysis showed that NACTx is associated with a mean anastomotic leak rate of 6.8%. In the RCT, postoperative morbidity and overall toxicity was significantly less in the NACTx group. Mean T downstaging (ypStage 0-I) was 49.6%, mean N downstaging 69.6% and mean pathologic complete response (pCR) 10.7%. The RCT showed an inferior pCR rate after NACTx than after NA-CRT, but similar rates of T downstaging. Mean LR was 8.6% and mean distant recurrence 17.2%. Satisfactory survival rates are reported by several studies. NACTx seems to be an alternative to NA-CRT for patients with LARC, associated with low anastomotic leak, adequate tumour downstaging, low LR and rather high survival rates. Further data deriving from high-quality studies are necessary to assess safety and efficacy of NACTx as a substitute to NA-CRT, for at least a subset of patients with LARC.

Importance of the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score to the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score is a promising indicator of survival after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. However, its effectiveness after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone has not been fully investigated.

METHODS

We analyzed data retrospectively on 61 patients with rectal cancer, who received NAC followed by surgical resection between 2010 and 2015, and evaluated the impact of the NAR score on survival.

RESULTS

The median NAR score was 14.9. Of the 61 patients, 13, 35, and 13 were classified as having NAR-low (< 8), NAR-intermediate (8-16), and NAR-high (> 16) scores, respectively. The median observation period was 49.0 months. According to the NAR score, the 3-year DFS in the NAR-low group was 100%, which was significantly better than that in the NAR-intermediate (64.8%, p = 0.041), and NAR-high (61.5%, p = 0.018) groups. When the NAR-intermediate and NAR-high groups were investigated as a single high-risk group, the 3-year DFS of the patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy was 88.7%, which was significantly better than that of the patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (53.3%, p = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

The NAR score may predict the DFS and could serve as a favorable indicator of adjuvant chemotherapy after NAC alone.

Predicting prognosis according to preoperative chemotherapy response in patients with locally advanced lower rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is regarded as the standard of treatment for locally advanced lower rectal cancer, although some of these cases are systemic, and distant control may be inadequate. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy could compensate for such shortcomings, potentially yielding better survival outcomes. We aimed to stratify patients into prognostic groups on the basis of preoperative factors, including response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with locally advanced lower rectal adenocarcinoma (clinical stage II/III with high-risk features of distant metastasis) who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (without radiotherapy) followed by curative resection between 2010 and 2017. Reduction in tumor volume (before vs. after neoadjuvant chemotherapy) was measured using magnetic resonance imaging, and a reduction above 60% was defined as a good response. Recurrence and overall survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 102 patients. Good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better 5-year recurrence-free survival (good responders: 81.1%, poor responders: 49.0%; p = 0.001) and 5-year overall survival (good responders: 94.9%, poor responders: 80.6%; p = 0.06). In a multivariate analysis, extramural venous invasion on magnetic resonance imaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a tumor volume reduction rate < 60 were found to be significantly and independently associated with worse recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio: 2.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.36-5.50, p = 0.005 and hazard ratio: 3.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.57-7.72, p = 0.002, respectively). Good responders without extramural venous invasion had the best 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival (89.0 and 93.8%, respectively). Poor responders with extramural venous invasion had the worst 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival (21.4 and 50.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Reductions in tumor volume after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were associated with a better prognosis in patients with locally advanced lower rectal cancer. Extramural venous invasion was a preoperative prognostic factor.