Low vulnerability of the right phrenic nerve to electroporation ablation

Pulsed Field Ablation: A Comprehensive Update

One of the recent advancements in the field of cardiac electrophysiology is pulsed field ablation (PFA). PFA is a novel energy modality that does not rely on thermal processes to achieve ablation which, in turn, results in limited collateral damage to surrounding structures. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms, safety, efficacy, and clinical applications of PFA for the management of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. We also summarize the published pre-clinical and clinical studies regarding this new technology.

Value of high-output pace-mapping of the right phrenic nerve for enabling safe radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights from three-dimensional computed tomography segmentation

AIMS

Right phrenic nerve (RPN) injury is a disabling but uncommon complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) radiofrequency ablation. Pace-mapping is widely used to infer RPN's course, for limiting the risk of palsy by avoiding ablation at capture sites. However, information is lacking regarding the distance between the endocardial sites of capture and the actual anatomic RPN location. We aimed at determining the distance between endocardial sites of capture and anatomic CT location of the RPN, depending on the capture threshold.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In consecutive patients undergoing AF radiofrequency ablation, we defined the course of the RPN on the electroanatomical map with high-output pacing at up to 50 mA/2 ms, and assessed RPN capture threshold (RPN-t). The true anatomic course of the RPN was delineated and segmented using CT scan, then merged with the electroanatomical map. The distance between pacing sites and the RPN was assessed. In 45 patients, 1033 pacing sites were analysed. Distances from pacing sites to RPN ranged from 7.5 ± 3.0 mm (min 1) when RPN-t was ≤10 mA to 19.2 ± 6.5 mm (min 9.4) in cases of non-capture at 50 mA. A distance to the phrenic nerve > 10 mm was predicted by RPN-t with a ROC curve area of 0.846 [0.821-0.870] (P < 0.001), with Se = 80.8% and Sp = 77.5% if RPN-t > 20 mA, Se = 68.0% and Sp = 91.6% if RPN-t > 30 mA, and Se = 42.4% and Sp = 97.6% if non-capture at 50 mA.

CONCLUSION

These data emphasize the utility of high-output pace-mapping of the RPN. Non-capture at 50 mA/2 ms demonstrated very high specificity for predicting a distance to the RPN > 10 mm, ensuring safe radiofrequency delivery.

Pulsed Field vs Conventional Thermal Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Recurrent Atrial Arrhythmia Burden

BACKGROUND

The ADVENT randomized trial revealed no significant difference in 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmias (AA) between thermal (radiofrequency/cryoballoon) and pulsed field ablation (PFA). However, recent studies indicate that the postablation AA burden is a better predictor of clinical outcomes than the dichotomous endpoint of 30-second AA recurrence.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to determine: 1) the impact of postablation AA burden on outcomes; and 2) the effect of ablation modality on AA burden.

METHODS

In ADVENT, symptomatic drug-refractory patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent PFA or thermal ablation. Postablation transtelephonic electrocardiogram monitor recordings were collected weekly or for symptoms, and 72-hour Holters were at 6 and 12 months. AA burden was calculated from percentage AA on Holters and transtelephonic electrocardiogram monitors. Quality-of-life assessments were at baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS

From 593 randomized patients (299 PFA, 294 thermal), using aggregate PFA/thermal data, an AA burden exceeding 0.1% was associated with a significantly reduced quality of life and an increase in clinical interventions: redo ablation, cardioversion, and hospitalization. There were more patients with residual AA burden <0.1% with PFA than thermal ablation (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0-2.3; P = 0.04). Evaluation of outcomes by baseline demographics revealed that patients with prior failed class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs had less residual AA burden after PFA compared to thermal ablation (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.4-4.3; P = 0.002); patients receiving only class II/IV antiarrhythmic drugs pre-ablation had no difference in AA burden between ablation groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with thermal ablation, PFA more often resulted in an AA burden less than the clinically significant threshold of 0.1% burden. (The FARAPULSE ADVENT PIVOTAL Trial PFA System vs SOC Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation [ADVENT]; NCT04612244).

Efficacy and safety of a novel hexaspline pulsed field ablation system in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the PLEASE-AF study

AIMS

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging non-thermal ablative modality demonstrating considerable promise for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, these PFA trials have almost universally included only Caucasian populations, with little data on its effect on other races/ethnicities. The PLEASE-AF trial sought to study the 12-month efficacy and the safety of a multi-electrode hexaspline PFA catheter in treating a predominantly Asian/Chinese population of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) by delivering different pulse intensities at the PV ostium (1800 V) and atrium (2000 V). Acute success was defined as no PV potentials and entrance/exit conduction block of all PVs after a 20-min waiting period. Follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months included 12-lead electrocardiogram and 24-h Holter examinations. The primary efficacy endpoint was 12-month freedom from any atrial arrhythmias lasting at least 30 s. The cohort included 143 patients from 12 hospitals treated by 28 operators: age 60.2 ± 10.0 years, 65.7% male, Asian/Chinese 100%, and left atrial diameter 36.6 ± 4.9 mm. All PVs (565/565, 100%) were successfully isolated. The total procedure, catheter dwell, total PFA application, and total fluoroscopy times were 123.5 ± 38.8 min, 63.0 ± 30.7 min, 169.7 ± 34.6 s, and 27.3 ± 10.1 min, respectively. The primary endpoint was observed in 124 of 143 patients (86.7%). One patient (0.7%) developed a small pericardial effusion 1-month post-procedure, not requiring intervention.

CONCLUSION

The novel hexaspline PFA catheter demonstrated universal acute PVI with an excellent safety profile and promising 12-month freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias in an Asian/Chinese population with paroxysmal AF.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05114954.

Safety of pulsed field ablation in more than 17,000 patients with atrial fibrillation in the MANIFEST-17K study

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging technology for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), for which pre-clinical and early-stage clinical data are suggestive of some degree of preferentiality to myocardial tissue ablation without damage to adjacent structures. Here in the MANIFEST-17K study we assessed the safety of PFA by studying the post-approval use of this treatment modality. Of the 116 centers performing post-approval PFA with a pentaspline catheter, data were received from 106 centers (91.4% participation) regarding 17,642 patients undergoing PFA (mean age 64, 34.7% female, 57.8% paroxysmal AF and 35.2% persistent AF). No esophageal complications, pulmonary vein stenosis or persistent phrenic palsy was reported (transient palsy was reported in 0.06% of patients; 11 of 17,642). Major complications, reported for ~1% of patients (173 of 17,642), were pericardial tamponade (0.36%; 63 of 17,642) and vascular events (0.30%; 53 of 17,642). Stroke was rare (0.12%; 22 of 17,642) and death was even rarer (0.03%; 5 of 17,642). Unexpected complications of PFA were coronary arterial spasm in 0.14% of patients (25 of 17,642) and hemolysis-related acute renal failure necessitating hemodialysis in 0.03% of patients (5 of 17,642). Taken together, these data indicate that PFA demonstrates a favorable safety profile by avoiding much of the collateral damage seen with conventional thermal ablation. PFA has the potential to be transformative for the management of patients with AF.

Autonomic Effects of Pulsed Field vs Thermal Ablation for Treating Atrial Fibrillation: Subanalysis of ADVENT

BACKGROUND

Autonomic denervation is an ancillary phenomenon during thermal ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), that may have synergistic effects on symptomatic improvement and long-term freedom from AF. Pulsed field ablation (PFA), a nonthermal ablation modality, was noninferior to thermal ablation in treating AF; however, PFA's relative myocardial selectivity may minimize autonomic effects.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) metrics as markers of autonomic function after ablation using PFA vs thermal ablation.

METHODS

ADVENT (FARAPULSE ADVENT PIVOTAL Trial PFA System vs SOC Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation) was a randomized pivotal study comparing PFA (pentaspline catheter) with thermal ablation (radiofrequency [RF] or cryoballoon [CB]) for treating paroxysmal AF. Baseline HR was acquired from a pre-ablation 12-lead electrocardiogram, whereas follow-up HRs, as well as HRV (standard deviation of all normal to normal RR intervals, standard deviation of 5-minute average RR intervals) metrics, were derived from 72-hour Holter monitors at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

This study included 379 paroxysmal AF patients undergoing PFA (n = 194) or thermal ablation (n = 185; n = 102 RF, n = 83 CB) completing 6- and 12-month Holter monitoring. Compared with PFA, thermal patients had significantly greater increases in HR from baseline to 6 months (ΔHR; 10.1 vs 5.9 beats/min; P = 0.02) and 12 months (ΔHR; 8.8 vs 5.2 beats/min; P = 0.03). This increase in HR at 6 and 12 months was similar between CB and RF (P = 0.94 and 0.83, respectively). HRV, both standard deviation of all normal to normal RR intervals and standard deviation of 5-minute average RR intervals, were significantly lower at both 6 and 12 months after thermal ablation compared with PFA (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PFA's effect on the autonomic nervous system was attenuated compared with thermal ablation. Whether this affects long-term freedom from AF or symptomatic bradycardia/pauses after AF ablation requires further study.

State-of-the-art pulsed field ablation for cardiac arrhythmias: ongoing evolution and future perspective

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an innovative approach in the field of cardiac electrophysiology aimed at treating cardiac arrhythmias. Unlike traditional catheter ablation energies, which use radiofrequency or cryothermal energy to create lesions in the heart, PFA utilizes pulsed electric fields to induce irreversible electroporation, leading to targeted tissue destruction. This state-of-the-art review summarizes biophysical principles and clinical applications of PFA, highlighting its potential advantages over conventional ablation methods. Clinical data of contemporary PFA devices are discussed, which combine predictable procedural outcomes and a reduced risk of thermal collateral damage. Overall, these technological developments have propelled the rapid evolution of contemporary PFA catheters, with future advancements potentially impacting patient care.

Mapping and Ablation of Premature Ventricular Complexes: State of the Art

Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are common arrhythmias in clinical practice. Although benign and asymptomatic in most cases, PVCs may result in disabling symptoms, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, or PVC-induced ventricular fibrillation. Catheter ablation has emerged as a first-line therapy in such cases, with high rates of efficacy and low risk of complications. Significant progress in mapping and ablation technology has been made in the past 2 decades, along with the development of a growing body of knowledge and accumulated experience regarding PVC sites of origin, anatomical relationships, electrocardiographic characterization, and mapping/ablation strategies. This paper provides an overview of the main indications for catheter ablation of PVCs, electrocardiographic features, PVC mapping techniques, and contemporary ablation approaches. The authors also review the most common sites of PVC origin and the main considerations and challenges with ablation in each location.

Pulsed field ablation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: an ex vivo assessment of safety

BACKGROUND

Pulse field ablation (PFA) is a novel catheter ablation technology with potential safety benefits due to its tissue selectivity. It has the potential to directly damage or interact with the functionality of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in the form of electromagnetic interference (EMI). The aim of our study was to assess the impact of PFA on CIEDs.

METHODS

PFA lesions (45 per CIED) were applied from the Farapulse system to CIEDs (< 5 cm from the lead tip and < 15 cm from the generator). All devices were checked before and after PFA application for proper sensing and pacing functionality as well as for integrity of shock circuits in ICDs using a heart simulator. Moreover, devices were then interrogated for any spontaneous reprogramming, mode switching or other EMI effects.

RESULTS

In total, 44 CIEDs were tested (16 pacemaker, 21 ICDs, 7 CRT-P/D) with 1980 PFA applications. There was no change in device settings, functionality and electrical parameters, and there was no macroscopic damage to the devices. The risk of damage to the electric components or leads on a patient-based analysis is 0/44 (95% CI 0-8%) and on a PFA pulse-based analysis is 0/1980 (95% CI 0-0.2%). Clinically relevant EMI appeared with oversensing and pacing inhibition but not tachycardia detection.

CONCLUSIONS

Bipolar PFA appears safe and does not result in damage to CIEDs or leads. Clinically relevant EMI does occur, but appropriate peri-procedural programming may mitigate this. In vivo studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Anesthetic Techniques for Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Comparative Review

Atrial fibrillation, the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, has witnessed significant advancements in treatment modalities, transitioning from invasive procedures like the maze procedure to minimally invasive catheter ablation techniques. This review focuses on recent improvements in anesthetic approaches that enhance outcomes in catheter atrial fibrillation ablation. We highlight the efficacy of contact force sensing catheters with steerable introducer sheaths, which outperform traditional catheters by ensuring more effective contact time and lesion formation. Comparing general anesthesia with conscious sedation, we find that general anesthesia provides superior catheter stability due to reduced respiratory variability, resulting in more effective lesion formation, and reduced pulmonary vein reconnection. The use of high-frequency jet ventilation under general anesthesia, delivering low tidal volumes, effectively minimizes left atrial movement, decreasing catheter displacement and procedure time, and reducing recurrence in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. An alternative, high-frequency low tidal volume ventilation using conventional ventilators, also shows improved catheter stability and lesion durability compared to traditional ventilation methods. However, a detailed comparative study of high-frequency jet ventilation, high-frequency low tidal volume ventilation, and conventional mechanical ventilation in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is lacking. This review emphasizes the need for such studies to identify optimal anesthetic techniques, potentially enhancing patient outcomes in atrial fibrillation treatment. Our findings suggest that careful selection of anesthetic methods, including ventilation strategies, plays a crucial role in the success of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, warranting further research for evidence-based practice.

Nitroglycerin to Ameliorate Coronary Artery Spasm During Focal Pulsed-Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

In treating atrial fibrillation, pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has comparable efficacy to conventional thermal ablation, but with important safety advantages: no esophageal injury or pulmonary vein stenosis, and rare phrenic nerve injury. However, when PFA is delivered in proximity to coronary arteries using a pentaspline catheter, which generates a broad electrical field, severe vasospasm can be provoked.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to study the vasospastic potential of a focal PFA catheter with a narrower electrical field and develop a preventive strategy with nitroglycerin.

METHODS

During atrial fibrillation ablation, a focal PFA catheter was used for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. Angiography of the right coronary artery (some with fractional flow reserve measurement) was performed before, during, and after PFA. Beyond no nitroglycerin (n = 5), and a few testing strategies (n = 8), 2 primary nitroglycerin administration strategies were studied: 1) multiple boluses (3-2 mg every 2 min) into the right atrium (n = 10), and 2) a bolus (3 mg) into the right atrium with continuous peripheral intravenous infusion (1 mg/min; n = 10).

RESULTS

Without nitroglycerin, cavotricuspid isthmus ablation provoked moderate-severe vasospasm in 4 of 5 (80%) patients (fractional flow reserve 0.71 ± 0.08). With repetitive nitroglycerin boluses, severe spasm did not occur, and mild-moderate vasospasm occurred in only 2 of 10 (20%). Using the bolus + infusion strategy, severe and mild-moderate spasm occurred in 1 and 3 of 10 patients (aggregate 40%). No patient had ST-segment changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus using a focal PFA catheter routinely provokes right coronary vasospasm. Pretreatment with high doses of parenteral nitroglycerin prevents severe spasm.

Pulsed-field ablation for repeat procedures after failed prior thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation

Background

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal ablation technology. Its potential value for repeat procedures after unsuccessful thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation has not been assessed.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to summarize our initial experience with patients undergoing repeat procedures using PFA.

Methods

Consecutive patients with arrhythmia recurrences after a prior thermal ablation undergoing a repeat procedure using a multipolar PFA catheter from May 2021 and December 2022 were included. After 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping, reconnected pulmonary veins (PVs) were reisolated and veins with only ostial isolation wither ablated to widen antral PV isolation. Posterior wall ablation was performed if all PVs were durably isolated or in case of low-voltage areas on the posterior wall at the discretion of the operator. Patients underwent follow-up with 7-day Holter electrocardiography after 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results

A total of 186 patients undergoing a repeat procedure using PFA were included. The median number of previous ablations was 1 (range 1-6). The prior ablation modality was radiofrequency in 129 patients (69.4%), cryoballoon in 51 (27.4%), and epicardial ablation in 6 (3.2%). At the beginning of the procedure, 258 of 744 PVs (35%) showed reconnections. Additional antral ablations were applied in 236 of 486 still isolated veins (49%). Posterior wall ablation was added in 125 patients (67%). Major complications occurred in 1 patient (transient ischemic attack 0.5%). Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in Kaplan-Meier-analysis was 78% after 6 months and 54% after 12 months.

Conclusion

PFA is a versatile and safe option for repeat procedures after failed prior thermal ablation.

Pulsed field ablation versus thermal energy ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of procedural efficiency, safety, and efficacy

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) induces cell death through electroporation using ultrarapid electrical pulses. We sought to compare the procedural efficiency characteristics, safety, and efficacy of ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) using PFA compared with thermal energy ablation.

METHODS

We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared ablation of AF with PFA versus thermal energy sources. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals (CI) were measured for dichotomous variables and mean difference (MD) 95% CI were measured for continuous variables, where RR < 1 and MD < 0 favor the PFA group.

RESULTS

We included 6 comparative studies for a total of 1012 patients who underwent ablation of AF: 43.6% with PFA (n = 441) and 56.4% (n = 571) with thermal energy sources. There were significantly shorter procedures times with PFA despite a protocolized 20-min dwell time (MD - 21.95, 95% CI - 33.77, - 10.14, p = 0.0003), but with significantly longer fluroscopy time (MD 5.71, 95% CI 1.13, 10.30, p = 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in periprocedural complications (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.59-2.44) or recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.31, 1.34) between the PFA and thermal ablation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of this meta-analysis, PFA was associated with shorter procedural times and longer fluoroscopy times, but no difference in periprocedural complications or rates of recurrent AF when compared to ablation with thermal energy sources. However, larger randomized control trials are needed.

Pulsed-field vs. cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation: a propensity score matched comparison of one-year outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has shown favourable data in terms of safety and procedural efficiency for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We sought to compare procedural and 1-year follow-up data of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PVI using PFA, cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing a first PVI with PFA at our institution were included. For comparison, patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing a first PVI with CBA and RFA were selected using a 1:2:2 propensity score matching. The PFA group followed the standard 32-applications lesion-set protocol, the CBA group a time-to-effect plus 2-min strategy, and the RFA group the CLOSE protocol. Patients were followed with 7d-Holter ECGs 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. The primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) following a blanking period of 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were included (PFA n = 40; CBA n = 80; RFA n = 80). Median procedure times were shortest with CBA (75 min) followed by PFA (94 min) and RFA (182 min; p < 0.001). Fluoroscopy dose was lowest with RFA (1.6Gycm2) followed by PFA (5.0Gycm2) and CBA (5.7Gycm2; p < 0.001). After a 1-year follow-up, freedom from ATa recurrence was 85.0% with PFA, 66.2% with CBA and 73.8% with RFA (p = 0.12 PFA vs. CBA; p = 0.27 PFA vs. RFA).

CONCLUSION

In a propensity score matched analysis of patients with paroxysmal AF, freedom from any ATa 1 year after PVI using PFA was favourable and at least as good as for PVI with CBA or RFA.

A pilot clinical assessment of biphasic asymmetric pulsed field ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), and its selective ablation characteristics give it a significant advantage in treatment. In previous cellular and animal experiments, we have demonstrated that biphasic asymmetric pulses can be used to ablate myocardial tissue. However, small-scale clinical trials are needed to test whether this approach is safe and feasible before extensive clinical trials can be performed. Therefore, the purpose of this experiment is to determine the safety and feasibility of biphasic asymmetric pulses in patients with AF and is to lay the foundation for a larger clinical trial. Ablation was performed in 10 patients with AF using biphasic asymmetric pulses. Voltage mapping was performed before and after PFA operation to help us detect the change in the electrical voltage of the pulmonary veins (PV). 3-Dimensional mapping system showed continuous low potential in the ablation site, and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was achieved in all four PV of the patients. There were no recurrences, PV stenosis, or other serious adverse events during the 12 months follow-up. The results suggest that PFA using biphasic asymmetric waveforms for patients with AF is safe, durable, and effective and that a larger clinical trial could begin.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier, ChiCTR2100051894.

Efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation vs. novel cryoballoon ablation system for atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel treatment technology for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Cryoballoon (CB) is the most frequently used single shot technology. A direct comparison to a novel CB system is lacking. We aimed to compare pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using PFA vs. a novel CB system regarding efficiency, safety, myocardial injury, and outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-one consecutive patients underwent PVI and were included (age 64 ± 9.7 years, ejection fraction 0.58 ± 0.09, left atrial size 40 ± 6.4 mm, paroxysmal AF 64%). 106 patients (59%) underwent PFA (FARAPULSE, Boston Scientific) and 75 patients (41%) underwent CB ablation (PolarX, Boston Scientific). The median procedure time, left atrial dwell time and fluoroscopic time were similar between the PFA and the CB group with 55 [interquartile range (IQR) 43-64] min vs. 58 (IQR 48-69) min (P < 0.087), 38 (30-49) min vs. 37 (31-48) min, (P = 0.871), and 11 (IQR 9.3-14) min vs. 11 (IQR 8.7-16) min, (P < 0.81), respectively. Three procedural complications were observed in the PFA group (two tamponades, one temporary ST elevation) and three complications in the CB group (3× reversible phrenic nerve palsies). During the median follow-up of 404 days (IQR 208-560), AF recurrence was similar in the PFA group and the CB group with 24 vs. 30%, P = 0.406.

CONCLUSION

Procedural characteristics were very similar between PFA and CB in regard to procedure duration fluoroscopy time and complications. Atrial fibrillation free survival did not differ between the PFA and CB groups.

Clinical Outcomes by Sex After Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Importance

Previous studies evaluating the association of patient sex with clinical outcomes using conventional thermal ablative modalities for atrial fibrillation (AF) such as radiofrequency or cryoablation are controversial due to mixed results. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel AF ablation energy modality that has demonstrated preferential myocardial tissue ablation with a unique safety profile.

Objective

To compare sex differences in patients undergoing PFA for AF in the Multinational Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Postapproval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation (MANIFEST-PF) registry.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective cohort study of MANIFEST-PF registry data, which included consecutive patients undergoing postregulatory approval treatment with PFA to treat AF between March 2021 and May 2022 with a median follow-up of 1 year. MANIFEST-PF is a multinational, retrospectively analyzed, prospectively enrolled patient-level registry including 24 European centers. The study included all consecutive registry patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent first-ever PFA for paroxysmal or persistent AF.

Exposure

PFA was performed on patients with AF. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation and additional ablation, which was performed at the discretion of the operator.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from clinically documented atrial arrhythmia for 30 seconds or longer after a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety outcome was the composite of acute (<7 days postprocedure) and chronic (>7 days) major adverse events (MAEs).

Results

Of 1568 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.5] years; 1015 male [64.7%]) with AF who underwent PFA, female patients, as compared with male patients, were older (mean [SD] age, 68 [10] years vs 62 [12] years; P < .001), had more paroxysmal AF (70.2% [388 of 553] vs 62.4% [633 of 1015]; P = .002) but had fewer comorbidities such as coronary disease (9% [38 of 553] vs 15.9% [129 of 1015]; P < .001), heart failure (10.5% [58 of 553] vs 16.6% [168 of 1015]; P = .001), and sleep apnea (4.7% [18 of 553] vs 11.7% [84 of 1015]; P < .001). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 99.8% of female (552 of 553) and 98.9% of male (1004 of 1015; P = .90) patients. Additional ablation was performed in 22.4% of female (124 of 553) and 23.1% of male (235 of 1015; P = .79) patients. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia was similar in male and female patients (79.0%; 95% CI, 76.3%-81.5% vs 76.3%; 95% CI, 72.5%-79.8%; P = .28). There was also no significant difference in acute major AEs between groups (male, 1.5% [16 of 1015] vs female, 2.5% [14 of 553]; P = .19).

Conclusion and Relevance

Results of this cohort study suggest that after PFA for AF, there were no significant sex differences in clinical effectiveness or safety events.

Pulsed Field or Conventional Thermal Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation is an effective treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pulsed field ablation, which delivers microsecond high-voltage electrical fields, may limit damage to tissues outside the myocardium. The efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation as compared with conventional thermal ablation are not known.

METHODS

In this randomized, single-blind, noninferiority trial, we assigned patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in a 1:1 ratio to undergo pulsed field ablation or conventional radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation. The primary efficacy end point was freedom from a composite of initial procedural failure, documented atrial tachyarrhythmia after a 3-month blanking period, antiarrhythmic drug use, cardioversion, or repeat ablation. The primary safety end point included acute and chronic device- and procedure-related serious adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 305 patients were assigned to undergo pulsed field ablation, and 302 were assigned to undergo thermal ablation. At 1 year, the primary efficacy end point was met (i.e., no events occurred) in 204 patients (estimated probability, 73.3%) who underwent pulsed field ablation and 194 patients (estimated probability, 71.3%) who underwent thermal ablation (between-group difference, 2.0 percentage points; 95% Bayesian credible interval, -5.2 to 9.2; posterior probability of noninferiority, >0.999). Primary safety end-point events occurred in 6 patients (estimated incidence, 2.1%) who underwent pulsed field ablation and 4 patients (estimated incidence, 1.5%) who underwent thermal ablation (between-group difference, 0.6 percentage points; 95% Bayesian credible interval, -1.5 to 2.8; posterior probability of noninferiority, >0.999).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation receiving a catheter-based therapy, pulsed field ablation was noninferior to conventional thermal ablation with respect to freedom from a composite of initial procedural failure, documented atrial tachyarrhythmia after a 3-month blanking period, antiarrhythmic drug use, cardioversion, or repeat ablation and with respect to device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 1 year. (Funded by Farapulse-Boston Scientific; ADVENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04612244.).

Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: Preclinical safety and effectiveness of a novel hexaspline ablation catheter

BACKGROUND

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a nonthermal energy source for cardiac ablation, with potential safety advantages over radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoballoon ablation.

OBJECTIVE

To report the preclinical results of a novel hexaspline PFA catheter for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and to verify the influence of PFA on esophagus by comparing with RFA.

METHODS

This study included a total of 15 canines for the efficacy and safety study and four swine for the esophageal safety study. The 15 canines were divided into an acute cohort (n = 3), a 30-day follow-up cohort (n = 5) and a 90-day follow-up cohort (n = 7), PVI was performed with the novel hexaspline PFA ablation catheter. In the esophageal safety study, four swine were divided into PFA cohort (n = 2) and RFA cohort (n = 2), esophageal injury swine model was adopted, the esophagus was intubated with an esophageal balloon retractor, under fluoroscopy, the DV8 device was inflated with a mixture of saline and contrast and rotated to displace the esophagus rightward and anteriorly toward the ablation catheter in the inferior vena cava (IVC) and right inferior pulmonary vein (PV). Nine PFA applications were delivered at four locations on IVC and two locations on the right inferior PV in the PFA cohort, six RFA applications were delivered at each location in the RFA group. Histopathological analysis of all PVs, esophagus, IVC, and the adjacent lungs was performed.

RESULTS

Acute PV isolation was achieved in all 15 canines (100%), with energy delivery times of less than 3 min/animal. In the 30 and 90 days group, the overall success rates were 88.9% and 88.5% per PVs, respectively. Two right superior pulmonary veins (RSPVs) in the 30-day group, two RSPVs and one left superior PV in the 90-day group with recovered potentials. At follow-up, gross pathological examination revealed the lesions around the PVs were continuous and transmural. Masson's trichrome staining revealed the myocardial cells in the PVs became fibrotic, but small arteries and nervous tissue were preserved. Results of swine esophageal injury model revealed the esophageal luminal surface was smooth and without evidence for esophageal injury in the PFA group, whereas obvious ulceration was detected on the esophagus tunica mucosa in the RFA group.

CONCLUSION

In the chronic canine study, PFA-based PVI were safe and effective with demonstrable sparing of nerves and venous tissue. Compared with RFA, there was also good evidence for safety of PFA, avoiding PV stenosis and esophageal injury. This preclinical study provided the scientific basis for the first-in-human endocardial PFA studies.

Safety and acute efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with pulsed field ablation vs thermal energy ablation: A meta-analysis of single proportions

Background

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel energy source for the ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) using ultrarapid electrical pulses to induce cell death via electroporation.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and acute efficacy of ablation for AF with PFA vs thermal energy sources.

Methods

We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that evaluated the safety and efficacy of ablation for AF with PFA and compared them to landmark clinical trials for ablation of AF with thermal energy sources. Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation was used to establish variance of raw proportions followed by the inverse with the random-effects model to combine the transformed proportions and generate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

We included 24 studies for a total of 5203 patients who underwent AF ablation. Among these patients, 54.6% (n = 2842) underwent PFA and 45.4% (n = 2361) underwent thermal ablation. There were significantly fewer periprocedural complications in the PFA group (2.05%; 95% CI 0.94-3.46) compared to the thermal ablation group (7.75%; 95% CI 5.40-10.47) (P = .001). When comparing AF recurrence up to 1 year, there was a statistically insignificant trend toward a lower prevalence of recurrence in the PFA group (14.24%; 95% CI 6.97-23.35) compared to the thermal ablation group (25.98%; 95% CI 15.75-37.68) (P = .132).

Conclusion

Based on the results of this meta-analysis, PFA was associated with lower rates of periprocedural complications and similar rates of acute procedural success and recurrent AF with up to 1 year of follow-up compared to ablation with thermal energy sources.

Lattice-tip catheter for single-shot pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation

BACKGROUND

A compressible lattice-tip catheter designed for focal ablation using radiofrequency or pulsed-field energies has been recently described. The objective of this study is to describe a new lattice catheter designed for single-shot pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

METHODS

This 8F catheter consists of a compressible lattice tip that is delivered over the wire and is expandable up to 34 mm (SpherePVI™, Affera Inc.). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) was applied from 6 elements using a biphasic waveform of microsecond scale (± 1.3-2.0 kV, 5 s per application). In 12 swine, the superior vena cava (SVC) and right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) were targeted for isolation. Animals were survived for 12-24 h (n = 6) or 3 weeks (n = 6) for evaluation of short and long-term safety and efficacy parameters. PVI was evaluated immediately after ablation and at the terminal procedure. Ablation-related microbubbles were examined using intracardiac echocardiography and phrenic nerve function by pacing. The tissue was examined by histopathology.

RESULTS

In all 12 animals, PFA resulted in successful acute isolation of the SVC and RSPV using 2.8 ± 1.1 and 3.2 ± 1.2 applications per vein, respectively. After a survival period of 23 ± 5.9 days, all targeted veins remained isolated, and the level of isolation persisted without significant regression or expansion. In one animal, SVC isolation at the level of the right atrial appendage resulted in sinus node arrest. PFA did not affect phrenic nerve function, and it was associated with a few isolated bubbles formation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pre-clinical study, a new expandable lattice catheter designed for single-shot PVI was able to achieve rapid and durable isolation.

Impact of Pulsed-Field Ablation on Intrinsic Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System After Pulmonary Vein Isolation

BACKGROUND

Although the autonomic reaction such as bradycardia is observed frequently during pulsed-field ablation (PFA)-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), its mechanism and effect on the adjacent intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system (ICANS) are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to reveal the clinical impact of PFA on ICANS by investigating the serum S100 increase (ΔS100), a well-known denervation relevant biomarker.

METHODS

Pre- and postprocedural serum S100 analyses were systematically conducted in patients undergoing PVI using either the pentaspline PFA or cryoballoon ablation (CBA) system. ΔS100 release kinetics were compared between both technologies. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was conducted to eliminate the effect of central nervous system release.

RESULTS

A total of 97 patients (PFA: n = 54 and CBA: n = 43) were enrolled. Overall S100 increased in both groups with a lower amount in PFA (0.035 μg/L; IQR: 0.02-0.063 μg/L) compared with CBA (0.12 μg/L; IQR: 0.09-0.17 μg/L; P < 0.0001). In cerebral magnetic resonance imaging, silent emboli were detected in 10 patients (18.5%) in PFA and 7 patients (16.3%) in CBA (P = 0.773). Even after excluding patients with cerebral emboli, ΔS100 was lower in PFA. During PFA PVI, 30 patients (56%) demonstrated transient bradycardia in 70 of 210 PVs (35%). ΔS100 was similar between patients with or without transient bradycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a significantly lower S100 release following PFA PVI vs CBA PVI even if silent cerebral emboli were excluded. Notably, vagal response during PFA was not associated with S100 release. These observations are in line with lower nervous tissue destruction of PFA compared with CBA.

Catheter-Based Electroporation: A Novel Technique for Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias

Catheter ablation of arrhythmias is now standard of care in invasive electrophysiology. Current ablation strategies are based on the use of thermal energy. With continuous efforts to optimize thermal energy delivery, effectiveness has greatly improved; however, safety concerns persist. This review focuses on a novel ablation technology, irreversible electroporation (IRE), also known as pulsed-field ablation which may be a safer alternative for arrhythmia management. Pulsed-field ablation is thought to be a nonthermal ablation that applies short-duration high-voltage electrical fields to ablate myocardial tissue with high selectivity and durability while sparing important neighboring structures such as the esophagus and phrenic nerves. There are multiple ongoing studies investigating the potential superior outcomes of IRE compared to radiofrequency ablation in treating patients with atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. In this review, we describe the current evidence of preclinical and clinical trials that have shown promising results of catheter-based IRE.

Targeted ablation of epicardial ganglionated plexi during cardiac surgery with pulsed field electroporation (NEURAL AF)

BACKGROUND

Modulation of the cardiac autonomic nervous system (ANS) is a promising adjuvant therapy in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). In pre-clinical models, pulsed field (PF) energy has the advantage of selectively ablating the epicardial ganglionated plexi (GP) that govern the ANS. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of epicardial ablation of the GPs with PF during cardiac surgery with a primary efficacy outcome of prolongation of the atrial effective refractory period (AERP).

METHODS

In a single-arm, prospective analysis, patients with or without a history of AF underwent epicardial GP ablation with PF during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). AERP was determined immediately pre- and post- GP ablation to assess cardiac ANS function. Holter monitors were performed to determine rhythm status and heart rate variability (HRV) at baseline and at 1-month post-procedure.

RESULTS

Of 24 patients, 23 (96%) received the full ablation protocol. No device-related adverse effects were noted. GP ablation resulted in a 20.7 ± 19.9% extension in AERP (P < 0.001). Post-operative AF was observed in 7 (29%) patients. Holter monitoring demonstrated an increase in mean heart rate (74.0 ± 8.7 vs. 80.6 ± 12.3, P = 0.01). There were no significant changes in HRV. There were no study-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of epicardial ablation of the GP using PF to modulate the ANS during cardiac surgery. Large, randomized analyses are necessary to determine whether epicardial PF ablation can offer a meaningful impact on the cardiac ANS and reduce AF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial registration: NCT04775264.

Determinants of acute irreversible electroporation lesion characteristics after pulsed field ablation: the role of voltage, contact, and adipose interference

AIMS

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal ablative approach in which cardiomyocyte death is obtained through irreversible electroporation (IRE). Data correlating the biophysical characteristics of IRE and lesion characteristics are limited. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different procedural parameters [voltage, number of cycles (NoCs), and contact] on lesion characteristics in a vegetal and animal model for IRE.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred and four Russet potatoes were used. Pulsed field ablation lesions were delivered on 3 cm cored potato specimens using a multi-electrode circular catheter with its dedicated IRE generator. Different voltage (from 300 to 1200 V) and NoC (from 1 to 5×) protocols were used. The impact of 0.5 and 1 mm catheter-to-specimen distances was tested. A swine animal model was then used to validate the results observed in the vegetable model. The association between voltage, the NoCs, distance, and lesion depth was assessed through linear regression. An almost perfect linear association between lesion depth and voltage was observed (R2 = 0.95; P < 0.001). A similarly linear relationship was observed between the NoCs and the lesion depth (R2 = 0.73; P < 0.001). Compared with controls at full contact, a significant dampening on lesion depth was observed at 0.5 mm distance (1000 V 2×: 2.11 ± 0.12 vs. 0.36 ± 0.04, P < 0.001; 2.63 ± 0.10 vs. 0.43 ± 0.08, P < 0.001). No lesions were observed at 1.0 mm distance.

CONCLUSION

In a vegetal and animal model for IRE assessment, PFA lesion characteristics were found to be strongly dependent on voltage settings and the NoCs, with a quasi-linear relationship. The lack of catheter contact was associated with a dampening in lesion depth.

A Focal Ablation Catheter Toggling Between Radiofrequency and Pulsed Field Energy to Treat Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Because of its safety, "single-shot" pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheters have been developed for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, most atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures are performed with focal catheters to permit flexibility of lesion sets beyond PVI.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the safety and efficacy of a focal ablation catheter able to toggle between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or PFA to treat paroxysmal or persistent AF.

METHODS

In a first-in-human study, a focal 9-mm lattice tip catheter was used for PFA posteriorly and either irrigated RFA (RF/PF) or PFA (PF/PF) anteriorly. Protocol-driven remapping was at ∼3 months postablation. The remapping data prompted PFA waveform evolution: PULSE1 (n = 76), PULSE2 (n = 47), and the optimized PULSE3 (n = 55).

RESULTS

The study included 178 patients (paroxysmal/persistent AF = 70/108). Linear lesions, either PFA or RFA, included 78 mitral, 121 cavotricuspid isthmus, and 130 left atrial roof lines. All lesion sets (100%) were acutely successful. Invasive remapping of 122 patients revealed improvement of PVI durability with waveform evolution: PULSE1: 51%; PULSE2: 87%; and PULSE3: 97%. After 348 ± 652 days of follow-up, the 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from atrial arrhythmias were 78.3% ± 5.0% and 77.9% ± 4.1% for paroxysmal and persistent AF, respectively, and 84.8% ± 4.9% for the subset of persistent AF patients receiving the PULSE3 waveform. There was 1 primary adverse event-inflammatory pericardial effusion not requiring intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

AF ablation with a focal RF/PF catheter allows efficient procedures, chronic lesion durability, and good freedom from atrial arrhythmias-for both paroxysmal and persistent AF. (Safety and Performance Assessment of the Sphere-9 Catheter and the Affera Mapping and RF/PF Ablation System to Treat Atrial Fibrillation; NCT04141007 and NCT04194307).

Determination of lethal electric field threshold for pulsed field ablation in ex vivo perfused porcine and human hearts

Introduction

Pulsed field ablation is an emerging modality for catheter-based cardiac ablation. The main mechanism of action is irreversible electroporation (IRE), a threshold-based phenomenon in which cells die after exposure to intense pulsed electric fields. Lethal electric field threshold for IRE is a tissue property that determines treatment feasibility and enables the development of new devices and therapeutic applications, but it is greatly dependent on the number of pulses and their duration.

Methods

In the study, lesions were generated by applying IRE in porcine and human left ventricles using a pair of parallel needle electrodes at different voltages (500-1500 V) and two different pulse waveforms: a proprietary biphasic waveform (Medtronic) and monophasic 48 × 100 μs pulses. The lethal electric field threshold, anisotropy ratio, and conductivity increase by electroporation were determined by numerical modeling, comparing the model outputs with segmented lesion images.

Results

The median threshold was 535 V/cm in porcine ((N = 51 lesions in n = 6 hearts) and 416 V/cm in the human donor hearts ((N = 21 lesions in n = 3 hearts) for the biphasic waveform. The median threshold value was 368 V/cm in porcine hearts ((N = 35 lesions in n = 9 hearts) cm for 48 × 100 μs pulses.

Discussion

The values obtained are compared with an extensive literature review of published lethal electric field thresholds in other tissues and were found to be lower than most other tissues, except for skeletal muscle. These findings, albeit preliminary, from a limited number of hearts suggest that treatments in humans with parameters optimized in pigs should result in equal or greater lesions.

Pulsed field ablation using focal contact force-sensing catheters for treatment of atrial fibrillation: acute and 90-day invasive remapping results

AIMS

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a promising alternative to thermal ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). We report performance and safety using the CENTAURI™ System (Galvanize Therapeutics) with three commercial, focal ablation catheters.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ECLIPSE AF (NCT04523545) was a prospective, single-arm, multi-centre study evaluating safety and acute and chronic pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) durability using the CENTAURI System in conjunction with the TactiCath SE, StablePoint, and ThermoCool ST ablation catheters. Patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF were treated at two centres. Patients were analysed in five cohorts based upon ablation settings, catheter, and mapping system. Pulsed field ablation was performed in 82 patients (74% male, 42 paroxysmal AF). Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 100% of pulmonary veins (322/322) with first-pass isolation in 92.2% (297/322). There were four serious adverse events of interest (three vascular access complications and one lacunar stroke). Eighty patients (98%) underwent invasive remapping. Pulsed field ablation development Cohorts 1 and 2 showed a per-patient isolation rate of 38% and 26% and a per-PV isolation rate of 47% and 53%, respectively. Optimized PFA Cohorts 3-5 showed a per-patient isolation rate of 60%, 73%, and 81% and a per-PV isolation rate of 84%, 90%, and 92%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ECLIPSE AF demonstrated that optimized PFA using the CENTAURI System with three commercial, contact force-sensing, solid-tip focal ablation catheters resulted in transmural lesion formation and high proportion of durable PVI with a favourable safety profile, thus providing a viable treatment option for AF that integrates with contemporary focal ablation workflows.

Cardioneuroablation Using Epicardial Pulsed Field Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia affecting millions of people worldwide. The cardiac autonomic nervous system (ANS) is widely recognized as playing a key role in both the initiation and propagation of AF. This paper reviews the background and development of a unique cardioneuroablation technique for the modulation of the cardiac ANS as a potential treatment for AF. The treatment uses pulsed electric field energy to selectively electroporate ANS structures on the epicardial surface of the heart. Insights from in vitro studies and electric field models are presented as well as data from both pre-clinical and early clinical studies.

Pulsed-Field Ablation on Mitral Isthmus in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Preliminary Data on Efficacy and Safety

BACKGROUND

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a new and promising modality of ablation that has been shown to specifically ablate cardiac tissue while sparing other anatomic structures, thus avoiding thermal ablation-related complications. Recent studies have certified safety and efficacy of PFA for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are very limited data assessing the feasibility and safety of PFA ablation of different substrates within the left atrium in the setting of persistent AF.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of mitral isthmus (MI) ablation in addition to PVI and posterior wall (PW) ablation with PFA in patients with persistent AF.

METHODS

We prospectively included all consecutive patients with persistent AF who underwent a first ablation procedure with PFA. We performed in all these patients a substrate ablation strategy comprising PVI, PW, and MI ablation with the use of PFA only. The primary feasibility endpoint was obtaining a persistent MI block at the end of the procedure. The safety endpoint was a composite of major safety events.

RESULTS

From November 2021 to September 2022, we included 45 patients. Complete MI block was achieved in all 45 (100%). Three patients presented with complications, among them 2 cases (4.4%) of reversible and nonfatal coronary spasm. During a mean follow-up time of 107.8 ± 59.5 days, a 20% recurrence rate was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

PFA is a feasible and safe ablation approach for mitral isthmus ablation in addition to PVI in patients with persistent AF.

Pearls and Pitfalls of Pulsed Field Ablation

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) was recently rediscovered as an emerging treatment modality for the ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. Ultra-short high voltage pulses are leading to irreversible electroporation of cardiac cells subsequently resulting in cell death. Current literature of PFA for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) consistently reported excellent acute and long-term efficacy along with a very low adverse event rate. The undeniable benefit of the novel ablation technique is that cardiac cells are more susceptible to electrical fields whereas surrounding structures such as the pulmonary veins, the phrenic nerve or the esophagus are not, or if at all, minimally affected, which results in a favorable safety profile that is expected to be superior to the current standard of care without compromising efficacy. Nevertheless, the exact mechanisms of electroporation are not yet entirely understood on a cellular basis and pulsed electrical field protocols of different manufactures are not comparable among one another and require their own validation for each indication. Importantly, randomized controlled trials and comparative data to current standard of care modalities, such as radiofrequency- or cryoballoon ablation, are still missing. This review focuses on the "pearls" and "pitfalls" of PFA, a technology that has the potential to become the future leading energy source for PVI and beyond.

PV Isolation Using a Spherical Array PFA Catheter: Application Repetition and Lesion Durability (PULSE-EU Study)

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies have revealed that pulsed field ablation (PFA) lesion dimensions increase with repetitive applications at a similar electric field.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated whether pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) durability varies with single vs repetitive pulsed field (PF) applications.

METHODS

Atrial fibrillation patients underwent PVI using a spherical multielectrode array PFA catheter delivered with a 19-F deflectable sheath under intracardiac echocardiographic guidance. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and brain magnetic resonance imaging were performed within 1 to 3 days, and invasive remapping at ∼2 to 3 months.

RESULTS

The patient cohort (n = 21; age 63 ± 11 years; 67% women) underwent PVI in either of 2 groups: group 1 (n = 11)-single PF application/PV; and group 2 (n = 10)-3 PF applications/PV. In both groups, PVI was acutely successful in all (100%) patients. Despite significantly longer pulse delivery times (75.2 ± 7.4 s/patient vs 24.5 ± 5.5 s/patient) the procedure times (73.2 ± 13.7 minutes vs 93.7 ± 18.5 minutes) were shorter with group 2 vs group 1. There was no stroke/transient ischemic attack, pericardial effusion, phrenic nerve injury, or esophageal complications. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was normal in both groups of patients (n = 9). Screening brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed asymptomatic cerebral lesions (diffusion weighted imaging+/ fluid attenuated inversion recovery-) in 3 of 16 (18.7%) patients. PV remapping revealed durable PVI in 62.5% PVs in group 1 (n = 10), compared with all 100% PVs in group 2 (n = 9); this translates to all PVs being durably isolated in 30% vs 100% (P < 0.05) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In his first-in-human trial, the "single-shot" spherical array PFA catheter was shown to safely isolate PVs. Repetitive PF application is key for lesion consolidation to maximize PVI durability.

Feasibility of Linear Irreversible Electroporation Ablation in the Coronary Sinus

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies demonstrated that the coronary sinus (CS) is an important target for ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation. However, radiofrequency ablation in the CS is associated with coronary vessel damage and tamponade. Animal data suggest irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation can be a safe ablation modality in vicinity of coronary arteries. We investigated the feasibility of IRE in the CS in a porcine model.

METHODS

Ablation and pacing was performed in the CS in six pigs (weight 60-75 kg) using a modified 9-French steerable linear hexapolar Tip-Versatile Ablation Catheter. Pacing maneuvers were performed from distal to proximal segments of the CS to assess atrial capture thresholds before and after IRE application. IRE ablations were performed with 100 J IRE pulses. After 3-week survival animals were euthanized and histological sections from the CS were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 27 IRE applications in six animals were performed. Mean peak voltage was 1509 ± 36 V, with a mean peak current of 22.9 ± 1.0 A. No complications occurred during procedure and 3-week survival. At 30 min post ablation 100% isolation was achieved in all animals. At 3 weeks follow-up pacing thresholds were significant higher as compared to baseline. Histological analysis showed transmural ablation lesions in muscular sleeves surrounding the CS.

CONCLUSION

IRE ablation of the musculature along the CS using a multi-electrode catheter is feasible in a porcine model.

Characteristics of pulsed electric field cardiac ablation porcine treatment zones with a focal catheter

OBJECTIVES

Pulsed electric field (PEF) therapies employ punctuated energy delivery to kill cells in a volume of tissue through mechanisms that are not dependent on thermal processes. A key component to successful cardiac ablation procedures is ensuring the generation of transmural, contiguous ablation zones, which requires in-depth knowledge regarding treatment sizes for a given therapeutic application.

METHODS

In this study, a series of acute treatments were delivered to porcine ventricles, where triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) vitality stain was used to identify treatment effect sizes for the three focal monopolar CENTAURI PEF cardiac ablation energy settings.

RESULTS

Treatment depths were 5.7, 7.2, and 8.2 mm for the 19, 22, and 25 A energy settings, respectively. Gross pathology indicated umbral zones of hemorrhage surrounded by pale avital TTC-negative-negative tissue, which contrasted significantly from radiofrequency ablation (RF) controls. Histologically, treatment zones are identified by regions of contraction band necrosis and cardiomyocytolysis, which contrasted with RF control lesions composed primarily of coagulation necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, these data indicate the ability for focal monopolar PEF treatments to generate deep treatment zones in cardiac ablation without incurring the gross or histological coagulative characteristics of RF thermal lesions.

Globe Pulsed Field System for High-definition Mapping and Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation ablation. Radiofrequency ablation has been the most common source of energy used to achieve PVI until now. In recent years, cryoballoon ablation has gained popularity due to its ability to perform PVI in a 'single-shot' fashion. In both cases (radiofrequency and cryoablation), the main limitation is their inability to achieve durable lesions without causing collateral damage to adjacent structures. In contrast, pulsed electric field (PEF) ablation is a non-thermal energy source that causes cell apoptosis by applying an electric current to the tissue. Lesions created by a field of energy seem to be more contiguous than traditional ablation, and the risk of damage to adjacent tissues is largely avoided due to the properties of the tissues and electrical fields. In recent years, new catheters capable of delivering PEF have been developed and are now undergoing clinical testing. In this article, we describe a complete solution for PVI: a single multielectrode catheter with 3D mapping capabilities that can deliver PEF in a single-shot PVI fashion with targeting beyond the pulmonary veins.

Coronary Arterial Spasm During Pulsed Field Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has a unique safety profile when used to treat atrial fibrillation, largely related to its preferentiality for myocardial tissue ablation, in particular, esophageal sparing. A pentaspline catheter was the first such PFA system studied clinically for atrial fibrillation ablation; in these initial regulatory trials, the catheter was used for pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial posterior wall ablation. Since its regulatory approval in Europe, in clinical practice, physicians have ablated beyond pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial posterior wall ablation to expanded lesion sets in closer proximity to coronary arteries. This is an unstudied important issue because preclinical and clinical data have raised the potential for coronary arterial spasm. Herein, we studied the vasospastic potential of PFA lesion sets, both remote from and adjacent to coronary arteries.

METHODS

During routine atrial fibrillation ablation using the pentaspline PFA catheter, coronary angiography was performed before, during, and after pulsed field applications. The lesion sets studied included: (1) those remote from the coronary arteries such as pulmonary vein isolation (n=25 patients) and left atrial posterior wall ablation (n=5), and (2) ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (n=20) that is situated adjacent to the right coronary artery.

RESULTS

During pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial posterior wall ablation, coronary spasm did not occur, but cavotricuspid isthmus ablation provoked severe subtotal vasospasm in 5 of 5 (100%) consecutive patients, and this was relieved by intracoronary nitroglycerin in 5.5±3.5 minutes. ST-segment elevation was not observed. However, no patient (0%, P=0.004) had severe spasm if first administered parenteral nitroglycerin, either intracoronary (n=5) or intravenous (n=10), before treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary vasospasm was not provoked during PFA at locations remote from coronary arteries, but when the energy is delivered adjacent to a coronary artery, PFA routinely provokes subclinical vasospasm. This phenomenon is attenuated by nitroglycerin, administered either post hoc to treat spasm or as prophylaxis.

Improvement in Lesion Formation with Radiofrequency Energy and Utilization of Alternate Energy Sources (Cryoablation and Pulsed Field Ablation) for Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation

Current ablation systems rely on thermal energy to produce ablation lesions (heating: RF, laser and ultrasound, and cooling: cryo-thermia). While thermal ablation has been proven to be effective, there are several limitations: 1) relatively long procedural times; 2) high recurrence rate of ventricular arrhythmias; and 3) excessive heating potentially leading to serious complications, including steam pop (perforation), coronary arterial injury and thrombo-embolism. Pulsed field ablation (PFA)/irreversible electroporation (IRE) offers a unique non-thermal ablation strategy which has the potential to overcome these limitations. Recent pre-clinical studies suggest that PFA/IRE might be effective and safe for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias.

Pulsed Field Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation: Autonomic Nervous System Effects

BACKGROUND

During atrial fibrillation ablations using thermal energy, the treatment effect is attributed to not just pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), but also to modulation of the autonomic nervous system by ablation of cardiac ganglionated plexi (GP).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the impact of pulsed field ablation (PFA) on the GP in patients undergoing PVI.

METHODS

In the retrospective phase, heart rate was assessed pre- versus post-PVI using PFA, cryoballoon ablation, or radiofrequency ablation. In the prospective phase, a pentaspline PFA catheter was used in a protocol: 1) pre-PFA, high-frequency stimulation (HFS) identified GP sites by vagal effects; 2) PVI was performed assessing for repetitive vagal effects over each set of PF applications; 3) mapping defined PVI extent to identify those GP in the ablation zone; and 4) repeat HFS at GP sites to assess for persistence of vagal effects.

RESULTS

Between baseline and 3 months, heart rates in the retrospective radiofrequency ablation (n = 40), cryoballoon (n = 40), and PFA (n = 40) cohorts increased by 8.9 ± 11.4, 11.1 ± 9.4, and -0.1 ± 9.2 beats/min, respectively (P= 0.01 PFA vs radiofrequency ablation; P= 0.01 PFA vs cryoballoon ablation). In the prospective phase, pre-PFA HFS in 20 additional patients identified 65 GP sites. During PFA, vagal effects were noted in 45% of first PF applications, persisting through all applications in 83%. HFS post-PFA reproduced vagal effects in 29 of 38 sites (76%) in low-voltage tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

PFA has minimal effect on GP. Unlike with thermal ablation, the mechanism by which PFA treats atrial fibrillation is mediated solely by durable PVI.

Cerebral safety after pulsed field ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel, nonthermal ablation modality that can ablate myocardial tissue with minimal effects on surrounding tissue. Preclinical data show an absence of cerebral emboli after extensive PFA. However, clinical data on silent cerebral lesions (SCLs) and/or silent cerebral events (SCEs) after PFA are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the occurrence of neurological deficits and SCL and/or SCE after PFA in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) using National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

In patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using PFA was performed. NIHSS scores were assessed before and 2 days and 30 days after PVI. One day after PVI, patients underwent cerebral 1.5-T MRI scanning using diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences to document the occurrence of SCL/SCE.

RESULTS

PFA was performed in 30 patients (age 63 ± 10 years). No patient showed neurological deficits. All NIHSS scores showed the minimum value of 0. Cerebral MRI scans were normal in 29 of 30 patients (97%). In 1 patient (3%), a single 7-mm cerebellar lesion was observed. Forty days after the procedure, follow-up cerebral MRI scan showed complete regression of the lesion.

CONCLUSION

In patients treated with PFA for symptomatic paroxysmal AF, the incidence of MRI-detected asymptomatic thromboembolic cerebral events or lesions was as low as 3%. No neurological deficits occurred in any of the patients.

Differential effect of high-frequency electroporation on myocardium vs. non-myocardial tissues

AIMS

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging non-thermal ablation method based on the biophysical phenomenon of electroporation. Data on PFA cardiac selectivity nature and tissue-specific thresholds are lacking. We aim to compare the in vivo differential effect of high-frequency irreversible electroporation (HF-IRE) protocols on various tissues.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-three Sprague-Dawle rodents were allocated into three different protocols of 300, 600, and 900 V, respectively, while delivering twenty 100 µs bursts of a 150 kHz biphasic square wave to five tissues; cardiac muscle, skeletal muscle, liver, carotid artery and sciatic nerve. Lesions were evaluated quantitatively by histologic analysis and by morphometric evaluation. There were eight, seven and eight animals in the 300, 600, and 900 V protocols, respectively. High-frequency electroporation protocols showed a graded effect on myocardial tissue with larger lesions in the 900 V protocol compared with the other two protocols as demonstrated by width (P = 0.02), length (P = 0.01) and fibrosis ratio (P = 0.001). This effect was not observed for other tissues with attenuated degree of damage. No damage to the carotid artery was observed in all protocols. Partial damage to the sciatic nerve was observed in only two samples (25%) in the 600 V group and in one sample (14.3%) in the 900 V group.

CONCLUSION

Electroporation effect is tissue-specific such that myocardium is more prone to electroporation damage compared with neural and vascular tissues. Our results suggest no neural or vascular damage with using a low-amplitude HF-IRE protocol. Further investigation is warranted to better identify other tissue-specific thresholds.

A computational comparison of radiofrequency and pulsed field ablation in terms of lesion morphology in the cardiac chamber

Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) has been developed over the last years as a novel electrical ablation technique for treating cardiac arrhythmias. It is based on irreversible electroporation which is a non-thermal phenomenon innocuous to the extracellular matrix and, because of that, PFA is considered to be safer than the reference technique, Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA). However, possible differences in lesion morphology between both techniques have been poorly studied. Simulations including electric, thermal and fluid physics were performed in a simplified model of the cardiac chamber which, in essence, consisted of a slab of myocardium with blood in motion on the top. Monopolar and bipolar catheter configurations were studied. Different blood velocities and catheter orientations were assayed. RFA was simulated assuming a conventional temperature-controlled approach. The PFA treatment was assumed to consist in a sequence of 20 biphasic bursts (100 µs duration). Simulations indicate that, for equivalent lesion depths, PFA lesions are wider, larger and more symmetrical than RFA lesions for both catheter configurations. RFA lesions display a great dependence on blood velocity while PFA lesions dependence is negligible on it. For the monopolar configuration, catheter angle with respect to the cardiac surface impacted both ablation techniques but in opposite sense. The orientation of the catheter with respect to blood flow direction only affected RFA lesions. In this study, substantial morphological differences between RFA and PFA lesions were predicted numerically. Negligible dependence of PFA on blood flow velocity and direction is a potential important advantage of this technique over RFA.

Catheter ablation induced phrenic nerve palsy by pulsed field ablation—completely impossible? A case series

Background

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new feasible and safe method for the ablative treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation (AF). Through the use of electric fields, it causes pore-like openings in the cell’s wall, leading to cell death. The most appealing characteristic of this new technique is its selectivity for cardiomyocytes and consequently its low risk of collateral damage to extracardiac tissues. We present three cases of a PFA-induced transient phrenic nerve (PN) injury documented during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

Case summaries

Three patients aged 55–81 years underwent PFA for symptomatic AF. Cases 1 and 3 were affected by paroxysmal AF without evidence of structural heart disease. Case 2 had persistent AF and ischaemic cardiomyopathy with preserved ejection fraction. We observed a transient right hemidiaphragm palsy during the delivery of impulses in the right superior pulmonary vein (Cases 1 and 2) and in the right inferior pulmonary vein (Case 3). The palsy lasted <1 min and was followed by spontaneous full recovery in all cases.

Discussion

Transient PN dysfunction can be observed following PFA in AF ablation. According to our initial experience, a full recovery of the PN function can be expected within seconds. We hypothesize a hyperpolarization of neuronal cells or a depletion of acetylcholine in the motoric endplate to explain this event. Further studies are required to understand the exact pathophysiological mechanism.

Pulsed Electrical Field in Arrhythmia Treatment: Current Status and Future Directions

Pulsed electrical field (PEF) ablation is a promising novel ablation modality for the treatment of arrhythmia, especially for atrial fibrillation(AF). It relies on electroporation inducing cellular permeabilization by the formation of pores in cell membranes, potentially resulting in cell death. Due to its' non-thermal nature and remarkable tissue selectivity, PEF ablation has be expected largely to replace conventional energy sources, such as radiofrequency (RF) and cryothermy. Up to now, the results in almost all clinical studies of PFA for AF ablation are optimistic, both in terms of effectiveness and safety. The possibility of clinical application of this technology to ventricular tachycardia(VT) has also been supported by several animal models. In this review, we aim to give an overview of the mechanism and technical progress of PFA in cardiac arrhythmia treatment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Establishing electroporation thresholds for targeted cell specific cardiac ablation in a 2D culture model

BACKGROUND

Irreversible electroporation has emerged as a new modality to overcome issues associated with other energy sources for cardiac ablation. Strong evidence on the optimal, effective, and selective voltage threshold is lacking for both in-vitro and pre-clinical in-vivo studies. The aim of this study is to examine the optimal threshold for selective cell ablation on cardiac associated cell types.

METHODS

Conventional monophasic and biphasic pulses of different field strength were delivered in a monolayer culture system of cardiomyocytes, neurons and adipocytes. The dynamics of cell death mechanisms were examined at different time points.

RESULTS

Neurons exhibit higher susceptibility to electroporation and cell death at higher field strength of 1250 V/cm in comparison to cardiomyocytes. Cardiac adipocytes showed lower susceptibility to electroporation in comparison to other cell types. A significant proportion of cardiomyocytes recovered after 24 hours post-electroporation, while neuronal cell death remained consistent but with a significant delayed cell death at a higher voltage threshold. Caspase 3/7 activity was observed in both cardiomyocytes and neurons, with a higher level of activity in cardiomyocytes in response to electroporation. Biphasic and monophasic pulses showed no significant difference in both cell types, and significantly lower cell death in neurons when inter pulse interval was reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents important findings on the differences in the susceptibility of neurons and cardiomyocytes to IRE. Cell type alone yielded selective and different dynamics in terms of the evolution and signaling mechanism of cell death in response to electroporation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: Effects on neuromodulation

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) represents the mainstay of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, and PVI with cryoballoon catheter (CB) ablation (CB-A) has proven to be as effective and safe as radiofrequency ablation (RF-A). Although AF is initiated by triggers arising from the pulmonary veins (PV) and non-PV foci, the intrinsic cardiac nervous system (ICNS) plays a significant role in the induction and maintenance of AF. The ICNS is an epicardial neural system composed of ganglionated plexi (GPs) and a complex network of interconnecting neurons. In the left atrium, the major GPs are located in proximity to the PV-left atrial junction. Vagal reactions have been described as markers of autonomic modulation during PVI with both RF-A and CB-A. The occurrence of neuromodulation during PVI with CB-A may be explained by both the anatomical relationship between the GPs and the PVs and the characteristics of the CB. Due to the CB/PV size mismatch, the CB creates a wide ablation area that extends from the PV ostium toward the antrum, possibly including the GPs. Although targeted GPs ablation, as a supplemental strategy to PVI, has been associated with a better AF outcome in patients undergoing RF-A, the additional clinical benefit of neuromodulation during PVI with CB-A remains a matter of debate. In this review, we provide an overview of the anatomy of the ICNS, the relationship between the ICNS and AF pathophysiology, and the current evidence on the clinical relevance of neuromodulation during PVI with CB-A.