E-cadherin immunohistochemical expression in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with morphology and CDH1 somatic alterations

Radiotracer Innovations in Breast Cancer Imaging: A Review of Recent Progress

This review focuses on the pivotal role of radiotracers in breast cancer imaging, emphasizing their importance in accurate detection, staging, and treatment monitoring. Radiotracers, labeled with radioactive isotopes, are integral to various nuclear imaging techniques, including positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission mammography (PEM). The most widely used radiotracer in breast cancer imaging is 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), which highlights areas of increased glucose metabolism, a hallmark of many cancer cells. This allows for the identification of primary tumors and metastatic sites and the assessment of tumor response to therapy. In addition to 18F-FDG, this review will explore newer radiotracers targeting specific receptors, such as estrogen receptors or HER2, which offer more personalized imaging options. These tracers provide valuable insights into the molecular characteristics of tumors, aiding in tailored treatment strategies. By integrating radiotracers into breast cancer management, clinicians can enhance early disease detection, monitor therapeutic efficacy, and guide interventions, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Ongoing research aimed at developing more specific and sensitive tracers will also be highlighted, underscoring their potential to advance precision medicine in breast cancer care.

Insights into E-Cadherin Impairment in CDH1-Unaltered Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Bioinformatic Study

Invasive lobular carcinoma exhibits unique morphological features frequently associated with alterations in CDH1. Although some studies have identified abnormalities in adhesion factors other than E-cadherin, the molecular mechanisms underlying E-cadherin abnormalities in CDH1-unaltered invasive lobular carcinoma remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the molecular underpinnings of E-cadherin dysregulation in invasive lobular carcinoma in the absence of CDH1 gene alterations, using comprehensive bioinformatic analyses. We conducted a comparative study of CDH1-mutated and non-mutated invasive lobular carcinoma and evaluated the differences in mRNA levels, reverse-phase protein array, methylation, and miRNAs. We observed that invasive lobular carcinoma cases without CDH1 alterations exhibited a significantly higher incidence of the Claudin-low subtype (p < 0.01). The results of the reverse-phase protein array indicate no significant difference in E-cadherin expression between CDH1-mutated and non-mutated cases. Therefore, abnormalities in E-cadherin production also exist in CDH1 non-mutated invasive lobular carcinoma. Considering that there are no differences in mRNA levels and methylation status, post-translational modifications are the most plausible explanation for the same. Hence, future studies should focus on elucidating the mechanism underlying E-cadherin inactivation via post-translational modifications in CDH1 non-mutated invasive lobular carcinoma.

E-cadherin staining in the diagnosis of lobular versus ductal neoplasms of the breast: the emperor has no clothes

Categorizing breast neoplasia as ductal or lobular is a daily exercise that relies on a combination of histologic and immunohistochemical tools. The historically robust link between loss of the E-cadherin molecule and lobular neoplasia has rendered staining for E-cadherin by immunohistochemistry a staple of this diagnostic process. Unfortunately, discordances between E-cadherin expression and histomorphology, and variations in E-cadherin staining patterns and intensities abound in clinical practice, but are often neglected in favour of a binary interpretation of the E-cadherin result. In this article, we highlight the complexities of E-cadherin expression through a review of the E-cadherin protein and its associated gene (CDH1), the mechanisms leading to aberrant/absent E-cadherin expression, and the implications of these factors on the reliability of the E-cadherin immunohistochemical stain in the classification of ductal versus lobular mammary neoplasia.

E-Cadherin Mutational Landscape and Outcomes in Breast Invasive Lobular Carcinoma

Invasive lobular carcinomas (ILC) are characterized by the loss of E-cadherin expression and CDH1 gene inactivation. Diagnostic reproducibility for this tumor type is currently suboptimal and could be improved by a better understanding of its histomolecular and clinical heterogeneity. We have analyzed the relationship between the presence, type, or position of CDH1 mutations, E-cadherin expression, and clinicopathological features (including outcome) in a retrospective series of 251 primary ILC with a long follow-up (median: 9.5 years). The mutational status of E-cadherin gene (CDH1) was determined by RNA sequencing from frozen tumor samples. E-cadherin immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed with antibodies directed against the intracellular domain (clone 4A2C7) and the extracellular domain (clone NCH38). IHC expression of p120 and β-catenin was also assessed in E-cadherin diffusely positive cases. Three major patterns of E-cadherin membrane expression were identified by IHC, with good agreement between the 2 clones (overall concordance: 83.8%, Kappa 0.67): null/focal expression (≤10%) (72.8% of cases for 4A2C7 and 83.8% for NCH38), heterogeneous expression (11%-89%) (19.2% of cases for 4A2C7 and 6.9% for NCH38), and diffuse expression (≥90%) (8% of cases for 4A2C7 and 9.3% for NCH38). E-cadherin membranous expression, when present, was abnormal (incomplete labeling and/or reduced intensity). ILC with diffuse E-cadherin expression showed abnormal β-catenin or p120-catenin staining in 21% of cases. Interestingly, these cases with diffusely expressed E-cadherin had a CDH1 mutation rate as high as the E-cadherin null/focal cases (∼70%) but were enriched in nontruncating mutations. Regarding CDH1 mutation location, intracytoplasmic domain mutations correlated with a divergent E-cadherin IHC phenotype between the 2 antibodies (4A2C7 ≤ 10%/NCH38 ≥ 10%). Clinico-pathological correlation analyses found that stromal amount (inversely correlated with tumor cellularity) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were less abundant in ILC with E-cadherin null/focal cases. In addition, CDH1 truncating mutations were associated with radiohistologic size discordance and were identified in multivariate survival analysis as an independent poor prognosis factor in terms of metastasis risk and breast cancer-related mortality. Overall, our study highlights the importance of the precise mutational status of CDH1 in the clinical, radiological, histologic, and phenotypic expression of lobular carcinomas. These findings should be taken into account in future attempts to improve diagnostic criteria or methods for ILC, as well as for clinicobiological studies dedicated to this tumor type.

Integration of Pathological Criteria and Immunohistochemical Evaluation for Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Diagnosis: Recommendations From the European Lobular Breast Cancer Consortium

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most frequent type of breast cancer (BC) and its peculiar morphology is mainly driven by inactivation of CDH1, the gene coding for E-cadherin cell adhesion protein. ILC-specific therapeutic and disease-monitoring approaches are gaining momentum in the clinic, increasing the importance of accurate ILC diagnosis. Several essential and desirable morphologic diagnostic criteria are currently defined by the World Health Organization, the routine use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for E-cadherin is not recommended. Disagreement in the diagnosis of ILC has been repeatedly reported, but interpathologist agreement increases with the use of E-cadherin IHC. In this study, we aimed to harmonize the pathological diagnosis of ILC by comparing 5 commonly used E-cadherin antibody clones (NCH-38, EP700Y, Clone 36, NCL-L-E-cad [Clone 36B5], and ECH-6). We determined their biochemical specificity for the E-cadherin protein and IHC staining performance according to type and location of mutation on the CDH1 gene. Western blot analysis on mouse cell lines with conditional E-cadherin expression revealed a reduced specificity of EP700Y and NCL-L-E-cad for E-cadherin, with cross-reactivity of Clone 36 to P-cadherin. The use of IHC improved interpathologist agreement for ILC, lobular carcinoma in situ, and atypical lobular hyperplasia. The E-cadherin IHC staining pattern was associated with variant allele frequency and likelihood of nonsense-mediated RNA decay but not with the type or position of CDH1 mutations. Based on these results, we recommend the indication for E-cadherin staining, choice of antibodies, and their interpretation to standardize ILC diagnosis in current pathology practice.

Invasive lobular breast cancer: Focus on prevention, genetics, diagnosis, and treatment

Invasive lobular cancer (ILC) is the most common of the breast cancer special types, accounting for up to 15% of all breast malignancies. The distinctive biological features of ILC include the loss of the cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin, which drives the tumor's peculiar discohesive growth pattern, with cells arranged in single file and dispersed throughout the stroma. Typically, such tumors originate in the lobules, are more commonly bilateral compared to invasive ductal cancer (IDC) and require a more accurate diagnostic examination through imaging. They are luminal in molecular subtype, and exhibit estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity and HER2 negativity, thus presenting a more unpredictable response to neoadjuvant therapies. There has been a significant increase in research focused on this distinctive breast cancer subtype, including studies on its pathology, its clinical and surgical management, and the high-resolution definition of its genomic profile, as well as the development of new therapeutic perspectives. This review will summarize the heterogeneous pattern of this unique disease, focusing on challenges in its comprehensive clinical management and on future insights and research objectives.

Molecular Pathology of Breast Tumors: Diagnostic and Actionable Genetic Alterations

Breast cancer is a heterogenous disease with various histologic subtypes, molecular profiles, behaviors, and response to therapy. After the histologic assessment and diagnosis of an invasive breast carcinoma, the use of biomarkers, multigene expression assays and mutation profiling may be used. With improved molecular assays, the identification of somatic genetic alterations in key oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes are playing an increasingly important role in many areas of breast cancer care. This review summarizes the most clinically significant somatic alterations in breast tumors and how this information is used to facilitate diagnosis, provide potential treatment options, and identify mechanisms of resistance.

E-cadherin re-expression: Its potential in combating TRAIL resistance and reversing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

The major limitation of conventional chemotherapy drugs is their lack of specificity for cancer cells. As a selective apoptosis-inducing agent, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) has emerged as an attractive alternative. However, most of the cancer cells are found to be either intrinsically resistant to the TRAIL protein or may develop resistance after multiple treatments, and TRAIL resistance can induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) at a later stage, promoting cancer invasion and migration. Interestingly, E-cadherin loss has been linked to TRAIL resistance and initiation of EMT, making E-cadherin re-expression a potential target to overcome these obstacles. Recent research suggests that re-expressing E-cadherin may reduce TRAIL resistance by enhancing TRAIL-induced apoptosis and preventing EMT by modulating EMT signalling factors. This reversal of EMT, can also aid in improving TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Therefore, this review provides remarkable insights into the mechanisms underlying E-cadherin re-expression, clinical implications, and potentiation, as well as the research gaps of E-cadherin re-expression in the current cancer treatment.

Immunohistochemical detection of cancer genetic abnormalities

New applications of immunohistochemistry (IHC) expand rapidly due to the development of molecular analyses and an increased understanding of molecular biology. IHC becomes much more important as a screening or even a confirmatory test for molecular changes in cancer. The past decades have witnessed the release of many immunohistochemical markers of the new generation. The novel markers have extensively high specificity and sensitivity for the detection of genetic abnormalities. In addition to diagnostic utility, IHC has been validated to be a practical tool in terms of treatments, especially molecular targeted therapy. In this review, we first describe the common alterations of protein IHC staining in human cancer: overexpression, underexpression, or loss of expression and altered staining pattern. Next, we examine the relationship between staining patterns and genetic aberrations regarding both conventional and novel IHC markers. We also mention current mutant-specific and fusion-specific antibodies and their concordance with molecular techniques. We then describe the basic molecular mechanisms from genetic events to corresponding protein expression patterns (membranous, cytoplasmic, or nuclear patterns). Finally, we shortly discuss the applications of immunohistochemistry in molecular targeted therapy. IHC markers can serve as a complementary or companion diagnostic test to provide valuable information for targeted therapy. Moreover, immunohistochemistry is also crucial as a companion diagnostic test in immunotherapy. The increased number of IHC novel antibodies is broadening its application in anti-cancer therapies.

Nonlobular Invasive Breast Carcinomas with Biallelic Pathogenic CDH1 Somatic Alterations: A Histologic, Immunophenotypic, and Genomic Characterization

CDH1 encodes for E-cadherin, and its loss of function is the hallmark of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Albeit vanishingly rare, biallelic CDH1 alterations may be found in nonlobular breast carcinomas (NL-BCs). We sought to determine the clinicopathologic characteristics and repertoire of genetic alterations of NL-BCs harboring CDH1 biallelic genetic alterations. Analysis of 5842 breast cancers (BCs) subjected to clinical tumor-normal sequencing with an FDA-cleared multigene panel was conducted to identify BCs with biallelic CDH1 pathogenic/likely pathogenic somatic mutations lacking lobular features. The genomic profiles of NL-BCs with CDH1 biallelic genetic alterations were compared with those of ILCs and invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs), matched by clinicopathologic characteristics. Of the 896 CDH1-altered BCs, 889 samples were excluded based on the diagnosis of invasive mixed ductal/lobular carcinoma or ILC or the detection of monoallelic CDH1 alterations. Only 7 of the 5842 (0.11%) BCs harbored biallelic CDH1 alterations and lacked lobular features. Of these, 4/7 (57%) cases were ER-positive/HER2-negative, 1/7 (14%) was ER-positive/HER2-positive, and 2/7 (29%) were ER-negative/HER2-negative. In total, 5/7 (71%) were of Nottingham grade 2, and 2/7 (29%) were of grade 3. The NL-BCs with CDH1 biallelic genetic alterations included a mucinous carcinoma (n = 1), IDCs with focal nested growth (n = 2), IDC with solid papillary (n = 1) or apocrine (n = 2) features, and an IDC of no special type (NST; n = 1). E-cadherin expression, as detected by immunohistochemistry, was absent (3/5) or aberrant (discontinuous membranous/cytoplasmic/granular; 2/5). However, NL-BCs with CDH1 biallelic genetic alterations displayed recurrent genetic alterations, including TP53, PIK3CA (57%, 4/7; each), FGFR1, and NCOR1 (28%, 2/7, each) alterations. Compared with CDH1 wild-type IDC-NSTs, NL-BCs less frequently harbored GATA3 mutations (0% vs 47%, P = .03), but no significant differences were detected when compared with matched ILCs. Therefore, NL-BCs with CDH1 biallelic genetic alterations are vanishingly rare, predominantly comprise IDCs with special histologic features, and have genomic features akin to luminal B ER-positive BCs.

Updates in the Use of Immunohistochemical Stains in Breast and Gynecologic Pathology

CONTEXT.—

The use of immunohistochemical stains in breast and gynecologic pathology has become increasingly complex, with various diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive applications.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide an update and review of immunohistochemical stains used in the practice of breast and gynecologic pathology. Established and new entities are reviewed, with descriptions of histomorphology and immunohistochemical staining patterns and discussion of interpretive pitfalls.

DATA SOURCES.—

Data were obtained from review of the English-language literature and firsthand experience of the authors in breast and gynecologic pathology.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Many entities in breast and gynecologic pathology benefit from evaluation with various immunohistochemical stains. These studies not only aid in the diagnosis and staging of tumors but also can provide prognostic and predictive information. Updated guidelines for recommended ancillary studies such as mismatch repair, p53, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) studies in endometrium, as well as estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER2 in breast, are discussed. Finally, the use and interpretation of established and novel immunohistochemical stains are discussed in various breast and gynecologic malignancies.

Evaluation of the routine use of E-cadherin immunohistochemistry in the typing of breast carcinomas: results of a randomized diagnostic study

AIMS

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) has distinct morphology and association with loss of E-cadherin function. It has special clinical and imaging features, and its proper recognition is important. Following a recent proposal, we tested the value of the routine use of E-cadherin immunohistochemistry (IHC) in recognizing ILC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Five pathologists with experience in breast pathology from four Hungarian institutions histotyped 1001 breast cancers from diagnostic core biopsies or excision specimens randomly assigned to haematoxylin and eosin (HE) diagnosis first, followed by E-cadherin IHC; or to immediate HE and E-cadherin-based diagnosis. Of 524 cases with HE diagnosis, 73(14%) were deemed uncertain. E-cadherin made the initial histological type change in 14/524 cases (2.7%), including three with confident HE-based type allocation. Use of E-cadherin immunostaining was considered useful in 88/477 cases (18%) with immediate dual assessment, and typing uncertainty went down to 5% (25/477 cases), but was not zero. Collective assessment of 171 uncertain, difficult, nonclassical cases resulted in consensus diagnosis in most cases, but 15 cases were still doubtful as concerns their proper histological type. CDH1 gene sequencing was attempted and successful in 13; pathogenic genetic alterations were identified in seven cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine use of E-cadherin IHC decreases the uncertainty in typing and improves the typing accuracy at the cost of potentially redundant additional immunostains. Furthermore, this procedure does not exclude uncertainty due to E-cadherin-positive ILCs, which are occasionally difficult to confidently label as ILC, especially when the growth pattern is not classic.

Diagnostic Pitfalls in Breast Cancer Pathology With an Emphasis on Core Needle Biopsy Specimens

CONTEXT.—

Breast pathology has many mimics and diagnostic pitfalls. Evaluation of malignant breast lesions, particularly in the biopsy setting, can be especially challenging, with diagnostic errors having significant management implications.

OBJECTIVE.—

To discuss the pitfalls encountered when evaluating ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast carcinomas, providing histologic clues and guidance for appropriate use and interpretation of immunohistochemistry to aid in the correct diagnosis.

DATA SOURCES.—

Data were obtained from review of pertinent literature of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast carcinomas and from the experience of the authors as practicing breast pathologists.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Awareness of the pitfalls in diagnosing breast cancers is important when creating a differential diagnosis for each breast lesion evaluated. This review will cover some of these scenarios to aid in the diagnostic process.

Single-cell profile of tumor and immune cells in primary breast cancer, sentinel lymph node, and metastatic lymph node

PURPOSE

Little is known about the host-tumor interaction in the lymph-node basin at a single cell level. This study examines single cell sequences in breast cancer nodal metastases of a patient with triple-negative breast cancer.

METHODS

The primary breast tumor, sentinel lymph node, an adjacent lymph node with metastatic involvement and a clinically normal-appearing lymph node were collected during surgery. Single-cell sequencing was performed on all four specimens.

RESULTS

14,016 cells were clustered into 6 cell subpopulations. Cancer cells demonstrated the molecular characteristics of TNBC basal B subtype and highly expressed genes in the MAPK signaling cascade. Tumor-associated macrophages regulated antigen processing and presentation and other immune-related pathways to promote tumor invasion. CD8 + and CD4 + T lymphocytes concentrated more in sentinel lymph node and mainly stratified into two transcriptional states. The immune-cell amount variation among primary tumor, sentinel and normal lymph nodes showed a similar tendency between the sc-RNA-seq profile of TNBC samples and a previous reported bulk RNA-seq profile of a breast cancer cohort, including all four breast cancer subtype samples.

DISCUSSION

Single-cell sequencing analysis suggested that the sentinel lymph node was the initial meeting site of tumor infiltration and immune response, where partial T lymphocytes perform anti-tumor activity, while other T cells exhibit an exhausted state. We proposed a molecular explanation to the well-established clinical principle that the 5-year and 10-year survival outcomes were noninferior between SLND and ALND.

Update on lobular lesions of the breast

The current histological classification of in-situ and invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) includes different morphological variants, some of which have been recently described. In this review, we will focus upon: (i) the diagnostic criteria of non-invasive lobular neoplasia and treatment implications across different countries; (ii) utility and limitations of immunohistochemistry; (iii) recently described variants of ILC; and (iv) the significance of lobular differentiation in invasive carcinoma for clinical management.

The morphologic spectrum of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) observations on clinical significance, management implications and diagnostic pitfalls of classic, florid and pleomorphic LCIS

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is a non-invasive proliferation of atypical dyscohesive epithelial cells characterized by loss or functional alteration of E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion. The morphologic spectrum of LCIS encompasses classic (C-LCIS), florid (F-LCIS) and pleomorphic LCIS (P-LCIS), as recently defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Consensus Group. Atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) is also part of this spectrum.This article highlights the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of the three forms of LCIS and summarizes their management implications and prognosis, with emphasis on F-LCIS and P-LCIS.

Proteomics-Based Identification of Dysregulated Proteins in Breast Cancer

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is still widely used as a morphology-based assay for in situ analysis of target proteins as specific tumor antigens. However, as a very heterogeneous collection of neoplastic diseases, breast cancer (BC) requires an accurate identification and characterization of larger panels of candidate biomarkers, beyond ER, PR, and HER2 proteins, for diagnosis and personalized treatment, without the limited availability of antibodies that are required to identify specific proteins. Top-down, middle-down, and bottom-up mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics approaches complement traditional histopathological tissue analysis to examine expression, modification, and interaction of hundreds to thousands of proteins simultaneously. In this review, we discuss the proteomics-based identification of dysregulated proteins in BC that are essential for the following issues: discovery and validation of new biomarkers by analysis of solid and liquid/non-invasive biopsies, cell lines, organoids and xenograft models; identification of panels of biomarkers for early detection and accurate discrimination between cancer, benign and normal tissues; identification of subtype-specific and stage-specific protein expression profiles in BC grading and measurement of disease progression; characterization of new subtypes of BC; characterization and quantitation of post-translational modifications (PTMs) and aberrant protein-protein interactions (PPI) involved in tumor development; characterization of the global remodeling of BC tissue homeostasis, diagnosis and prognostic information; and deciphering of molecular functions, biological processes and mechanisms through which the dysregulated proteins cause tumor initiation, invasion, and treatment resistance.

Multi-omics analyses provide novel biological insights to distinguish lobular ductal types of invasive breast cancers

BACKGROUND

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) treatment is similar to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC; now invasive carcinoma-no special type, IBC-NST), based on its intrinsic subtype. However, further investigation is required for an integrative understanding of differentially perturbed molecular patterns and pathways in these histotypes.

METHODS

A dataset of 780 IDC and 201 ILC samples from the TCGA-BRCA project for cross-platform multi-omics was analyzed. We leveraged a consensus approach integrating different bioinformatic algorithms to analyze mutations, CNAs, mRNA, miRNA abundance, methylation, and protein abundance to understand the complex crosstalks that distinguish ILC and IDC samples. A histotype-matched comparison was performed. We performed Cox survival analyses for prognosis based on our identified 53 histotype-specific and four discordant genes.

RESULTS

Approximately 90% of ILC cases were of the luminal subtype. Somatic mutations in CDH1 were higher in ILC than in IDC (FDR-adjusted p < 0.01). Fifty-three significant oncogenic or tumor-suppressive DEGs were identified in a single histotype. PPAR signaling and lipolysis regulation in adipocytes were significantly enriched in ILC tumors. CDH1 protein had the highest differential abundance (AUC: 0.85). Moreover, BTG2, GSTA2, GPR37L1, and PGBD5 amplification was associated with poorer OS in ILC compared with no alteration. RIMS2, NACA4P, MYC, ZFPM2, and POU5F1B amplification showed a lower overall survival in patients with IDC. miR-195 showed an IDC-specific downregulation, causing overexpression of CCNE1. Integrative multi-omics supervised analysis identified 296 differentially expressed genes that successfully distinguished IDC and ILC histotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings identify novel molecular candidates that potentially drive and modify the disease differentially among these histotypes.

Narrative review of progress in pathological diagnosis of breast cancer

Background and Objective

Breast cancer (BC) contains a spectrum of diseases with distinctive presentations, morphology, biology, and clinical phenotypes. BC varies significantly in its biological behaviour and response to treatment. Combination of the traditional histopathological with the molecular types of BC allows more accurate prediction of its biological and clinical heterogeneity. We aim to provide a review of the latest advances in breast pathological detection and related biomarkers.

Methods

We reviewed English publications in PubMed related to progress in pathological diagnosis of breast cancer from 2000 to 2022.

Key Content and Findings

This review outlines the latest advances in breast pathological detection and related biomarkers, include histological types, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), estrogen receptor (ER), Ki67, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. The histological types and molecular pathological markers of BC are closely related to its treatment and prognosis. The 5th edition World Health Organization (WHO) classification of Breast tumours more emphasis on the clinical significance of histological types. The consensus on the testing of biomarkers for BC has also become more precise, not only suggesting that the primary and metastases of BC be detected for the expressions of ER, PR, and HER2, but also introducing the concept of ER and HER2 low-expressions. In addition, the Ki67 proliferation index plays an important role in the expected therapeutic effect. With the gradual rise of immunotherapy, treatments based on programmed death protein-1/programmed death protein-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have achieved some results in clinical efficacy for BC, while studies related to tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are gradually gaining more attention.

Conclusions

With the deep and continued research of BC, these discoveries will demonstrate significant clinical application value in the future.

Inter-observer agreement for the histological diagnosis of invasive lobular breast carcinoma

Invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common breast carcinoma (BC) subtype and is mainly driven by loss of E‐cadherin expression. Correct classification of BC as ILC is important for patient treatment. This study assessed the degree of agreement among pathologists for the diagnosis of ILC. Two sets of hormone receptor (HR)‐positive/HER2‐negative BCs were independently reviewed by participating pathologists. In set A (61 cases), participants were provided with hematoxylin/eosin (HE)‐stained sections. In set B (62 cases), participants were provided with HE‐stained sections and E‐cadherin immunohistochemistry (IHC). Tumor characteristics were balanced. Participants classified specimens as non‐lobular BC versus mixed BC versus ILC. Pairwise inter‐observer agreement and agreement with a pre‐defined reference diagnosis were determined with Cohen's kappa statistics. Subtype calls were correlated with molecular features, including CDH1/E‐cadherin mutation status. Thirty‐five pathologists completed both sets, providing 4,305 subtype calls. Pairwise inter‐observer agreement was moderate in set A (median κ = 0.58, interquartile range [IQR]: 0.48–0.66) and substantial in set B (median κ = 0.75, IQR: 0.56–0.86, p < 0.001). Agreement with the reference diagnosis was substantial in set A (median κ = 0.67, IQR: 0.57–0.75) and almost perfect in set B (median κ = 0.86, IQR: 0.73–0.93, p < 0.001). The median frequency of CDH1/E‐cadherin mutations in specimens classified as ILC was 65% in set A (IQR: 56–72%) and 73% in set B (IQR: 65–75%, p < 0.001). Cases with variable subtype calls included E‐cadherin‐positive ILCs harboring CDH1 missense mutations, and E‐cadherin‐negative ILCs with tubular elements and focal P‐cadherin expression. ILCs with trabecular growth pattern were often misclassified as non‐lobular BC in set A but not in set B. In conclusion, subtyping of BC as ILC achieves almost perfect agreement with a pre‐defined reference standard, if assessment is supported by E‐cadherin IHC. CDH1 missense mutations associated with preserved E‐cadherin protein expression, E‐ to P‐cadherin switching in ILC with tubular elements, and trabecular ILC were identified as potential sources of discordant classification.

Expression of N-Terminal-Deficient E-Cadherin Protein in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast is characterized by the discohesive growth of tumor cells, which is mainly associated with the complete loss of E-cadherin (E-cad) expression. However, some aberrant expression patterns of E-cad protein that are inconsistent with their morphologies have been reported in ILC. We report herein ILC cases expressing a new type of abnormal E-cad protein that lacks the N-terminal domain, but conserves the C-terminal domain on the cell membrane. Immunohistochemical staining of 299 ILC cases using specific antibodies against the N-terminal or C-terminal region of E-cad revealed that 227 (76%) cases showed loss of the membranous expression of both terminuses (N-/C-) and 72 (24%) cases showed expression of only the C-terminus (N-/C+). In all cases, the expression of p120-catenin and β-catenin coincided with the expression of the C-terminus of E-cad. Clinicopathologic analysis revealed that N-/C+ expression in ILC cells was significantly associated with the histologic subtype (especially mixed-type ILC with another histologic type) and immunohistochemical molecular subtype (especially the triple-negative subtype), but not with prognostic factors (pT or pN). In addition, 12 of 15 cases (80%) with aberrant cytoplasmic localization of the N-terminal of E-cad showed diffuse membranous expression of the C-terminal domain. Additional immunohistochemistry using an antibody recognizing the extracellular juxtamembrane region showed that 28 (39%) of the N-/C+ cases had lost membranous expression, suggesting diversity in the deletion pattern of the N-terminal region. Our findings provide a novel mechanism for the loss of E-cad function because of N-terminal-deficient E-cad protein in ILC.

Lobular Breast Cancer: Histomorphology and Different Concepts of a Special Spectrum of Tumors

Simple Summary

Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is a special type of breast cancer (BC) that was first described in 1941. The diagnosis of ILC is made by microscopy of tumor specimens, which reveals a distinct morphology. This review recapitulates the developments in the microscopic assessment of ILC from 1941 until today. We discuss different concepts of ILC, provide an overview on ILC variants, and highlight advances which have contributed to a better understanding of ILC as a special histologic spectrum of tumors.

Abstract

Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is the most common special histological type of breast cancer (BC). This review recapitulates developments in the histomorphologic assessment of ILC from its beginnings with the seminal work of Foote and Stewart, which was published in 1941, until today. We discuss different concepts of ILC and their implications. These concepts include (i) BC arising from mammary lobules, (ii) BC growing in dissociated cells and single files, and (iii) BC defined as a morpho-molecular spectrum of tumors with distinct histological and molecular characteristics related to impaired cell adhesion. This review also provides a comprehensive overview of ILC variants, their histomorphology, and differential diagnosis. Furthermore, this review highlights recent advances which have contributed to a better understanding of the histomorphology of ILC, such as the role of the basal lamina component laminin, the molecular specificities of triple-negative ILC, and E-cadherin to P-cadherin expression switching as the molecular determinant of tubular elements in CDH1-deficient ILC. Last but not least, we provide a detailed account of the tumor microenvironment in ILC, including tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels, which are comparatively low in ILC compared to other BCs, but correlate with clinical outcome. The distinct histomorphology of ILC clearly reflects a special tumor biology. In the clinic, special treatment strategies have been established for triple-negative, HER2-positive, and ER-positive BC. Treatment specialization for patients diagnosed with ILC is just in its beginnings. Accordingly, ILC deserves greater attention as a special tumor entity in BC diagnostics, patient care, and cancer research.

Molecular Pathology of Breast Tumors: Diagnostic and Actionable Genetic Alterations

Breast cancer is a heterogenous disease with various histologic subtypes, molecular profiles, behaviors, and response to therapy. After the histologic assessment and diagnosis of an invasive breast carcinoma, the use of biomarkers, multigene expression assays and mutation profiling may be used. With improved molecular assays, the identification of somatic genetic alterations in key oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes are playing an increasingly important role in many areas of breast cancer care. This review summarizes the most clinically significant somatic alterations in breast tumors and how this information is used to facilitate diagnosis, provide potential treatment options, and identify mechanisms of resistance.

Aberrations of Chromosomes 1 and 16 in Breast Cancer: A Framework for Cooperation of Transcriptionally Dysregulated Genes

Derivative chromosome der(1;16), isochromosome 1q, and deleted 16q-producing arm-level 1q-gain and/or 16q-loss-are recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities in breast cancer, but their exact role in determining the malignant phenotype is still largely unknown. We exploited The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data to generate and analyze groups of breast invasive carcinomas, called 1,16-chromogroups, that are characterized by a pattern of arm-level somatic copy number aberrations congruent with known cytogenetic aberrations of chromosome 1 and 16. Substantial differences were found among 1,16-chromogroups in terms of other chromosomal aberrations, aneuploidy scores, transcriptomic data, single-point mutations, histotypes, and molecular subtypes. Breast cancers with a co-occurrence of 1q-gain and 16q-loss can be distinguished in a "low aneuploidy score" group, congruent to der(1;16), and a "high aneuploidy score" group, congruent to the co-occurrence of isochromosome 1q and deleted 16q. Another three groups are formed by cancers showing separately 1q-gain or 16q-loss or no aberrations of 1q and 16q. Transcriptome comparisons among the 1,16-chromogroups, integrated with functional pathway analysis, suggested the cooperation of overexpressed 1q genes and underexpressed 16q genes in the genesis of both ductal and lobular carcinomas, thus highlighting the putative role of genes encoding gamma-secretase subunits (APH1A, PSEN2, and NCSTN) and Wnt enhanceosome components (BCL9 and PYGO2) in 1q, and the glycoprotein E-cadherin (CDH1), the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase WWP2, the deubiquitinating enzyme CYLD, and the transcription factor CBFB in 16q. The analysis of 1,16-chromogroups is a strategy with far-reaching implications for the selection of cancer cell models and novel experimental therapies.

Clinicopathologic features of kinase fusion-related thyroid carcinomas: an integrative analysis with molecular characterization

The discovery of actionable kinase gene rearrangements has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of thyroid carcinomas. Unsolved challenges include histopathologic recognition of targetable cases, correlation between genotypes and tumor behavior, and evolving resistance mechanisms against kinase inhibitors (KI). We present 62 kinase fusion-positive thyroid carcinomas (KFTC), including 57 papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTC), two poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas (PDTC), two undifferentiated thyroid carcinomas (ATC), and one primary secretory carcinoma (SC), in 57 adults and 5 adolescents. Clinical records, post-operative histology, and molecular profiles were reviewed. Histologically, all KFTC showed multinodular growth with prominent intratumoral fibrosis. Lymphovascular invasion (95%), extrathyroidal extension, gross and microscopic (63%), and cervical lymph node metastasis (79%) were common. Several kinase fusions were identified: STRN-ALK, EML4-ALK, AGK-BRAF, CUL1-BRAF, MKRN1-BRAF, SND1-BRAF, TTYH3-BRAF, EML4-MET, TFG-MET, IRF2BP2-NTRK1, PPL-NTRK1, SQSTM1-NTRK1, TPR-NTRK1, TPM3-NTRK1, EML4-NTRK3, ETV6-NTRK3, RBPMS-NTRK3, SQSTM1-NTRK3, CCDC6-RET, ERC1-RET, NCOA4-RET, RASAL2-RET, TRIM24-RET, TRIM27-RET, and CCDC30-ROS1. Individual cases also showed copy number variants of EGFR and nucleotide variants and indels in pTERT, TP53, PIK3R1, AKT2, TSC2, FBXW7, JAK2, MEN1, VHL, IDH1, PTCH1, GNA11, GNAQ, SMARCA4, and CDH1. In addition to thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine, ten patients received multi-kinase and/or selective kinase inhibitor therapy, with 6 durable, objective responses and four with progressive disease. Among 47 cases with >6 months of follow-up (median [range]: 41 [6-480] months), persistent/recurrent disease, distant metastasis and thyroid cancer-related death occurred in 57%, 38% and 6%, respectively. In summary, KFTC encompass a spectrum of molecularly diverse tumors with overlapping clinicopathologic features and a tendency for clinical aggressiveness. Characteristic histology with multinodular growth and prominent fibrosis, particularly when there is extensive lymphovascular spread, should trigger molecular testing for gene rearrangements, either in a step-wise manner by prevalence or using a combined panel. Further, our findings provide information on molecular therapy in radioiodine-refractory thyroid carcinomas.