Current Concepts in the Management of Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis

Characterising the allergic fungal rhinosinusitis microenvironment using full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and fungal ITS sequencing

INTRODUCTION

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a severe phenotype of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), characterised by localised and exaggerated type 2 inflammation. While fungal antigenic stimulation of unregulated Th2-mediated inflammation is the core pathophysiological mechanism, the direct and synergistic role of bacteria in disease modification is a pervasive hypothesis. We set out to define the microenvironment of AFRS to elucidate virulent organisms that may be implicated in the pathophysiology of AFRS.

METHODOLOGY

We undertook a cross-sectional study of AFRS patients and non-fungal CRSwNP patients. Demographics, disease severity, culture and microbiome sequences were analysed. Multimodality microbiome sequencing included short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS) on the Illumina Miseq (16S rRNA and ITS) and full-length 16S rRNA sequencing on the Oxford Nanopore Technologies GridION (ONT).

RESULTS

Thirty-two AFRS and 29 non-fungal CRSwNP patients (NF) were included in this study. Staphylococcus aureus was the dominant organism cultured and sequenced in both AFRS and NF groups (AFRS 27.54%; NF 18.04%; p = .07). Streptococcus pneumoniae (AFRS 12.31%; NF 0.98%; p = .03) and Haemophilus influenzae (AFRS 15.03%; NF 0.24%; p = .005) were significantly more abundant in AFRS. Bacterial diversity (Shannon's index) was considerably lower in AFRS relative to NF (AFRS 0.6; NF 1.0, p = .008). Aspergillus was the most cultured fungus in AFRS (10/32, 31.3%). The AFRS sequenced mycobiome was predominantly represented by Malassezia (43.6%), Curvularia (18.5%) and Aspergillus (16.8%), while the NF mycobiome was nearly exclusively Malassezia (84.2%) with an absence of Aspergillus or dematiaceous fungi.

CONCLUSION

A low diversity, dysbiotic microenvironment dominated by Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae characterised the bacterial microbiome of AFRS, with a mycobiome abundant in Malassezia, Aspergillus and Curvularia. While Staphylococcus aureus has been previously implicated in AFRS through enterotoxin superantigen potential, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae are novel findings that may represent alternate cross-kingdom pathophysiological mechanisms.

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis linked to other hyper-IgE syndromes through defective TH17 responses

BACKGROUND

In a gene expression analysis comparing sinus mucosa samples from allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) patients with samples from non-AFRS chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp (CRSwNP) patients, the antimicrobial peptide (AMP) histatin 1 (HTN1) was found to be the most differentially downregulated gene in AFRS.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify the molecular etiology of the downregulated expression of HTN1.

METHODS

We used RT-PCR to compare the expression of AMPs and a fungistasis assay to evaluate the antifungal activity of sinus secretions. Using flow cytometry, we characterized the presence of TH17/TH22 cells and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling from AFRS patients, non-AFRS CRSwNP patients, and healthy controls.

RESULTS

We confirmed decreased expression of AMPs in AFRS sinus mucosa with concordant decrease in antifungal activity in sinus secretions. IL-22 and IL-22-producing T cells were deficient within sinus mucosa of AFRS patients. In vitro studies demonstrated a defect in IL-6/STAT3 signaling critical for TH17/TH22 differentiation. Epithelial cells from AFRS patients could express AMPs when stimulated with exogenous IL-22/IL-17 and circulating TH17 cell abundance was normal.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to other hyper-IgE syndromes, but distinct from CRSwNP, AFRS patients express a defect in STAT3 activation limited to IL-6-dependent STAT3 phosphorylation that is critical for TH17/TH22 differentiation. This defect leads to a local deficiency of IL-17/IL-22 cytokines and deficient AMP expression within diseased sinus mucosa of AFRS patients. Our findings support evaluation of therapeutic approaches that enhance airway AMP production in AFRS.

Manifestation and associated factors of systemic and local allergy among patients with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: An observational study

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis, characterized by excessive immune responses to environmental molds or fungi. The diagnosis and classification of AFRS into systemic and local types remain clinically challenging due to overlapping characteristics. This study investigated the prevalence of AFRS, its manifestation and associated factors in systemic and local AFRS. A total of 200 patients diagnosed with fungal rhinosinusitis underwent both skin provocation tests (SPT) and nasal provocation tests (NPT) to confirm AFRS and classify systemic and local types. Patients were considered to have AFRS if either the SPT or NPT was positive. Among these, patients with systemic AFRS were those who had a SPT positive. Local AFRS was when patients had a negative SPT and a positive NPT. Medical history, serum total IgE level, nasal endoscopy examinations, and CT scans were also recorded. Most patients were female (65.8%), with a mean age of 55.6 years (SD = 14.4). Based on the SPT and NPT results, 31% of patients (n = 62) were diagnosed with AFRS. Among these, 54.8% (n = 34) had systemic AFRS, while 45.2% (n = 28) had local AFRS. Patients with AFRS exhibited significantly higher levels of total IgE, eosinophils, and more pronounced signs and symptoms compared to those without AFRS. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between patients with systemic AFRS and those with local AFRS. AFRS was prevalent in our study. Among patients with AFRS, both systemic AFRS and local AFRS were also prevalent. While allergic indicators and clinical presentations can aid in AFRS diagnosis, minimal distinctions were observed between systemic and local AFRS. A comprehensive assessment incorporating both local and systemic allergic responses through provocation tests, such as a combination of skin and nasal tests, is imperative for optimizing AFRS diagnosis and management.

Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis in Europe: Literature Review and Own Experience

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is primary, Th2-mediated, chronic rhinosinusitis, which is diagnosed when the criteria defined by Bent and Khun are met. The disease is most common in countries located in the subtropical and tropical regions characterized by high temperatures and high levels of humidity, which favour the wider occurrence of fungi in the environment. The presence of specific IgE antibodies directed against fungal allergens, which is one of the diagnostic criteria, proves the systemic nature of the disease and allows one to distinguish AFRS from eosinophilic fungal rhinosinusitis. There is no unified treatment method for AFRS described in the literature, and relapses are common. Sinus surgery remains the treatment of choice. Oral and topical steroid therapy plays an important role in the treatment process. The effectiveness of antifungal treatment and immunotherapy is unclear. Biological treatment, the results of which are promising, has raised great hopes. The aim of this study was to reveal how often AFRS occurs in European countries, what environmental factors influence its development, and how important it is to specify its diagnostic criteria and treatment methods. We present an overview of the available literature. In addition, we share our own experience and describe two cases of AFRS diagnosed and treated at our centre.

Consideration of the Clinical Diagnosis of Allergic Fungal Sinusitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is characterized by refractory and high recurrence rate. Improper treatment may lead to repeated recurrence and even serious complications, including vision loss, blindness, and intracranial complications. However, AFRS is easy to be misdiagnosed clinically.

OBJECTIVE

To ensure early diagnosis, the clinical presentations of patients with AFRS were studied.

METHODS

Data from patients with sinusitis hospitalized in the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) from January 2015 to October 2022 were collected. The patients were divided into three groups; group A patients with AFRS, group B patients suspected of AFRS, and group C patients with fungus ball sinusitis (FBS).We retrospectively analyzed the data using IBM SPSS 19.0 to perform the chi-square test and one-way ANOVA test.

RESULTS

In total, 35 cases of AFRS, 91 cases of suspected AFRS, and 661 cases of FBS were rediagnosed. Compared with FBS patients, AFRS patients were younger, the total IgE, the percentage of eosinophils and basophils in peripheral blood were higher, and the proportion of patients with allergic rhinitis, asthma or hypo olfactory was higher. It had a higher recurrence rate. These results were also observed in the comparison between suspected AFRS patients and FBS patients, but no significant difference was found in the comparison between suspected AFRS patients and suspected AFRS patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

AFRS may be misdiagnosed due to the low detection of fungi. To ensure early diagnosis, we recommend that patients with clinical, radiological, and laboratory features similar to those of AFRS but without evidence of fungal staining be treated according to the treatment criteria of AFRS.

Endotyping Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Understanding Inflammation Beyond Phenotypes

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogenous group of inflammatory conditions impacting the nose and paranasal sinuses. Our understanding of the underlying pathobiology of CRSwNP has substantially improved due to ongoing translational research efforts. Advances in treatment options, including targeted respiratory biologic therapy for CRSwNP, allow for more personalized approaches for CRSwNP patient care. Patients with CRSwNP are typically classified to one or more endotype based on the presence of type 1, type 2, and type 3 inflammation. This review will discuss recent advances in our understanding of CRSwNP and how this may impact current and future treatment approaches for patients with CRSwNP.

New Developments in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis Pathophysiology and Treatment

BACKGROUND

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is an endotype of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps characterized by eosinophilic mucin laden with fungal hyphae entrapped in expanded sinus cavities with an exaggerated hypersensitivity to fungal elements. The last decade has elucidated fungi-driven inflammatory pathways contributing to the pathophysiology of chronic inflammatory respiratory diseases. In addition, novel therapeutic biologic options have become available for CRS over the last several years.

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature examining AFRS, focusing on recent developments in our understanding of its pathophysiology and implications for treatment options.

METHODS

Review article.

RESULTS

Fungi-driven respiratory inflammation has been linked to fungal proteinases and toxin activity. In addition, AFRS patients demonstrate a local sinonasal immunodeficiency in antimicrobial peptides and hence limited antifungal activity, along with an exaggerated type 2 inflammatory response, highlighting a possible imbalanced type 1, type 2, and type 3 profile. The elucidation of these dysregulated molecular pathways has highlighted novel potential therapeutic targets. As such, the clinical management of AFRS, which once included surgery and extended courses of oral corticosteroids, is transitioning away from long courses of oral corticosteroids to incorporate novel delivery mechanisms of topical therapeutic targets and biologics for recalcitrant disease.

CONCLUSION

AFRS is an endotype of CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) for which the molecular pathways leading to its inflammatory dysfunction are beginning to be illuminated. In addition to affecting treatment options, these understandings may shape necessary changes to diagnostic criteria and the extrapolated effects of environmental changes on AFRS. More critically, a better appreciation of fungi-driven inflammatory pathways may have implications for the understanding of broader CRS inflammation.

Pediatric allergic fungal rhinosinusitis: optimizing outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a debilitating condition for children. Despite there being several reviews on this topic in the adult population, there is a paucity of reviews of AFRS in the pediatric literature. This article reviews the recent evidence of pediatric AFRS with the aim to optimize outcomes of pediatric patients with this condition.

RECENT FINDINGS

AFRS is clinically characterized by nasal polyposis, a type I hypersensitivity to fungal epitopes, very thick eosinophilic mucin, and peripheral eosinophilia. Pediatric AFRS has similar clinical characteristics to that in adults but is thought to have a more aggressive nature, with higher serum immunoglobulin E and more frequently bone erosion and malformation of facial bones. Diagnosis of pediatric AFRS is made by using the Bent and Kuhn's criteria developed for adult AFRS. The mainstay of treatment is surgery followed by postoperative corticosteroids. Adjunctive therapies, including topical/oral antifungal agents, allergen immunotherapy and biologics may improve outcomes in pediatric AFRS, but to date the current evidence is limited.

SUMMARY

To optimize the outcome of pediatric AFRS, adequate and early diagnosis and treatment are essential. Appropriate and comprehensive endoscopic sinus surgery to open the sinuses, remove the fungal burden of disease and improve access of the sinuses to postoperative topical corticosteroid remains the standard of care.

Revisiting the controversy: The role of fungi in chronic rhinosinusitis

In the last two decades, the development of culture-independent genomic techniques has facilitated an increased appreciation of the microbiota-immunity interactions and their role in a multitude of chronic inflammatory diseases such as chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), asthma, inflammatory bowel disease and dermatitis. While the pathologic role of bacteria in chronic inflammatory diseases is generally accepted, the understanding of the role of fungi remains controversial. Chronic rhinosinusitis, specifically the phenotype linked to nasal polyps, represents a spectrum of chronic inflammatory diseases typically characterized by a type 2 immune response. Studies on the microbiota within sinus cavities from healthy and diseased patients have focused on the bacterial community, mainly highlighting the loss of diversity associated with sinus inflammation. Within the various CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) phenotypes, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis presents an opportunity to investigate the role of fungi in chronic type 2 immune responses as well as the antifungal immune pathways designed to prevent invasive fungal diseases. In this review, we examine the spectrum of fungi-associated sinus diseases highlighting the interaction between fungal species and host immune status on disease presentation. With a focus on fungi and type 2 immune response, we highlight the current knowledge and its limitations of the sinus mycobiota along with cellular interactions and activated molecular pathways linked to fungi.

New Perspectives in the Diagnosis and Management of Allergic Fungal Airway Disease

Allergy to airway-colonising, thermotolerant, filamentous fungi represents a distinct eosinophilic endotype of often severe lung disease. This endotype, which particularly affects adult asthma, but also complicates other airway diseases and sometimes occurs de novo, has a heterogeneous presentation ranging from severe eosinophilic asthma to lobar collapse. Its hallmark is lung damage, characterised by fixed airflow obstruction (FAO), bronchiectasis and lung fibrosis. It has a number of monikers including severe asthma with fungal sensitisation (SAFS) and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis/mycosis (ABPA/M), but these exclusive terms constitute only sub-sets of the condition. In order to capture the full extent of the syndrome we prefer the inclusive term allergic fungal airway disease (AFAD), the criteria for which are IgE sensitisation to relevant fungi in association with airway disease. The primary fungus involved is Aspergillus fumigatus, but a number of other thermotolerant species from several genera have been implicated. The unifying mechanism involves germination of inhaled fungal spores in the lung in the context of IgE sensitisation, leading to a persistent and vigorous eosinophilic inflammatory response in association with release of fungal proteases. Most allergenic fungi, including Alternaria and Cladosporium species, are not thermotolerant and cannot germinate in the airways so only act as aeroallergens and do not cause AFAD. Studies of the airway mycobiome have shown that A. fumigatus colonises the normal as much as the asthmatic airway, suggesting it is the tendency to become IgE-sensitised that is the critical triggering factor for AFAD rather than colonisation per se. Treatment is aimed at preventing exacerbations with glucocorticoids and increasingly by the use of anti-T2 biological therapies. Anti-fungal therapy has a limited place in management, but is an effective treatment for fungal bronchitis which complicates AFAD in about 10% of cases.