Critical care nursing workforce: Global imperatives, innovations and future-proofing - A call for papers

Continuum of nursing education and practice: Time to close the chasm between academia and practice

Nurses play a key role in the health of Americans. Unfortunately, the nation is expected to experience an increasing nursing shortage due to nurses retiring or leaving the profession and growing healthcare needs. In this context, it is important to prepare nursing students to be practice-ready graduates. To accomplish this goal, students must learn domain knowledge that is reflective of current nursing practices and have ample experiential learning opportunities, which require close collaboration between academia and practice in nursing education. Traditionally, faculty members who have developed nursing curriculum and the course content are mainly from within academia. The aims of the article are to describe prior efforts in academia-practice collaboration for baccalaureate-level nursing education and to propose the innovative Nursing Education and Practice Continuum model, which expands our team's successful collaborative projects. The model conceptualizes nursing education as a continuum between academia and practice, which constantly interact and evolve, and facilitates co-building and co-implementing nursing education courses for both students and practicing nurses. Nursing practice is also a continuum between experiential learning and practice after graduation. This continuum model can be implemented by aligning baccalaureate-level nursing education with the Nurse Residency Program curriculum. This article also addresses potential challenges and strategies during implementation.

What interventions and programmes are available to support older nurses in the workplace? A literature review of available evidence

BACKGROUND

High exit rates, stalling entry rates, population ageing, and, most recently, the COVID-19 pandemic have placed significant strain on the world's nursing workforce. Both developed and developing countries face similar predicaments. Evidence-based programmes to support older nurses in the workplace are urgently needed to ensure the sustainability of a career in nursing for this group of healthcare professionals.

OBJECTIVES

To scope and synthesise available evidence on evaluated programmes and interventions implemented to support the ageing nursing workforce's health, wellbeing, and retention.

DESIGN

A literature review of available evidence using a systematic approach.

METHOD

Medline, Scopus, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched for relevant peer-reviewed evidence. Data from the peer-reviewed literature were extracted separately into purpose designed-extraction spreadsheets. Information relevant to study design, intervention design, outcome constructs, intervention outcomes, and barriers and enablers to intervention success were collected. The protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42021274491].

RESULTS

Eighteen published studies were included in this review. We identified a range of interventions and programmes that have been implemented to support older nurses, which included flexible and reduced work arrangements, mentoring programmes, exercise and lifestyle interventions, continued professional development and purpose-designed remote retreats. We found limited evidence of evaluated outcomes from workplace support interventions that addresses the actual challenges faced by ageing nurses as reported in previous literature reviews. Interventions that were designed to promote a sense of purpose at work resulted in positive outcomes and appeared to more directly address the stated needs of older nurses. Holistic programmes and interventions that could potentially promote both physical well-being and psychological well-being required a broader, whole-of-organisation approach rather than more piecemeal interventions addressing individual physical and mental health concerns. Interventions which acknowledged older nurses' clinical expertise and experience (e.g., mentoring programmes) were linked to positive outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Future intervention efforts should acknowledge and balance intervention participation opportunities against existing everyday workload constraints faced by older nurses. Our review suggests the need for further intervention studies assessing specific outcomes such as psychological and emotional health, as well as interventions that more directly address the most pressing concerns that ageing nurses report at personal and organisational levels. A paradigm shift in productivity measurement in clinical nursing work is required in order to increase the value placed on the unique contribution of older nurses working clinically, particularly in sharing their acquired knowledge, skill, and expertise.

Critical Care Resource Nurse Team: A Patient Safety and Quality Outcomes Model

The Critical Care Resource Nurse Team (CCRNT) evolved from our traditional Rapid Response Team (RRT). The CCRNT is a unique paradigm created using the conceptual framework of the American Association of Critical Care Nursing Synergy Model for Patient Care. The goal of the CCRNT is to help align nurse competencies with patient needs. This team was seen as a much-needed strong clinical support by nursing leadership as large numbers of inexperienced new graduate registered nurses were hired and senior experienced nurses were leaving the workforce. The CCRNT supports 24/7 RRT, Code Blue, Code Stroke, Emergency Airway Response Team, Early Warning System, Medical Emergency Team, simulation team training, and bedside nurse support and mentoring. Coverage expanded from inpatient medical/surgical areas to all areas of the medical center and included hospital-wide initiatives. The focus for the CCRNT changed to a system-wide nursing and patient safety model to improve practice and intervene in near-miss events. This model improved communication between disciplines, provided critical surveillance of at-risk patients, supported patient safety with a significant decrease in patient mortality, and offered a 24/7 expert critical care nurse resource team for staff.

Are intensive care units good places for nursing students' learning compared to other settings? Findings from an Italian national study

OBJECTIVE

To explore students' perceived quality of the intensive care unit learning environment during their rotations; to compare these perceptions with that reported by students attending other settings and to assess correlations between the perceptions regarding the quality of the environment and the competences learned.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

A secondary analysis of data collected by a national cross-sectional study carried out in Italy. A total of 9607 nursing students participated; they ranked the intensive care units' quality, as assessed by the Clinical Learning Quality Evaluation Index; the perceived competences learned were also ranked with a Likert scale; from 0 = None to 3 = Very much.

RESULTS

A total of 323 (3.5%) participants attended their rotation in an intensive care unit. They perceived the quality of the environment to be significantly higher (n = 2.11 out of 3) than those rotating in non-intensive care unit wards (n = 1.91; p < 0.001). The competences learned by intensive care unit students were significantly higher than that reported by students attending non-intensive care unit wards (n = 2.31 out of 3 vs 2.06 out of 3; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Intensive care units are highly appreciated by students, both in terms of their quality learning environment and their capacity to promote learning compared to other settings. Therefore, intensive care units should be considered as a place for clinical rotation to promote positive attitudes regarding critical care patients.