Comparative in vitro activity of antiribosomal agents on penicillin-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in relation to their resistance genotypes

Therapeutic options for pneumococcal pneumonia in Turkey

BACKGROUND

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Streptococcus pneumoniae continues to be the most important causative agent in CAP.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews options for the empiric treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia in Turkey based on local epidemiologic data.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of studies evaluating antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among clinical isolates of S pneumoniae in Turkey from 2000 onward. Relevant studies were identified through literature searches of both Turkish (Ulakbim and Pleksus) and international (MEDLINE) databases using the search terms S pneumoniae and Turkey. Only antibiotics likely to be used in pneumococcal pneumonia were evaluated. The minimum concentration required to inhibit 90% of isolates (MIC(90)) for each antibiotic was obtained by averaging all reported values to arrive at a single value for the entire country.

RESULTS

The MIC(90) for penicillin was 1 g/mL; among all isolates of S pneumoniae, 6.4% were penicillin resistant and 30.9% showed intermediate susceptibility. The MIC(90)s and overall rates of resistance (combined intermediate susceptibility and resistance) for the other antibiotics studied were as follows: cefaclor, 4 microg/mL (26.3%); cefuroxime, 2 microg/mL (15.4%); ceftriaxone, 0.25 microg/mL (0.75%); imipenem, 0.06 microg/mL (0%); erythromycin, 2 microg/mL (13.9%); clarithromycin, 2 microg/mL (13.7%); azithromycin, 2 microg/mL (13.8%); telithromycin, 0.06 microg/mL (no published breakpoints); trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 4 microg/mL (63.8%); tetracycline, 16 microg/mL (24.6%); ciprofloxacin, 2 microg/mL (no published breakpoints); ofloxacin, 2 microg/mL (4%); levofloxacin, 1 microg/mL (0%); gemifloxacin, 0.06 microg/mL (no published breakpoints); and moxifloxacin, 0.06 microg/mL (0%). Penicillin G, at standard parenteral doses, has been shown to achieve concentrations above the MIC for >40% to 100% of the dosing interval, depending on the MIC of the isolate. Based on pharmacodynamic studies, the MIC(90) for penicillin in Turkey should easily be exceeded with the use of penicillin G 3 mU QID. In vitro, susceptibility is generally greater to amoxicillin than to penicillin, with average amoxicillin MIC values approximately 1 dilution lower than those for penicillin. Amoxicillin's better pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties relative to penicillin make it a reasonable option for the treatment of CAP. In pharmacodynamic studies, amoxicillin 1 g TID achieved and maintained serum concentrations of 2 to 4 microg/mL for at least 40% of the dosing interval. A new formulation of amoxicillin/clavulanate given 2000/125 mg BID is expected to eradicate isolates of S pneumoniae at an amoxicillin MIC < or = 4 microg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on data from Turkish surveillance studies performed from 2000 onward, high-dose parenteral penicillin G and parenteral/oral amoxicillin may be initial choices for the empiric treatment of uncomplicated pneumococcal pneumonia in Turkey. If these agents cannot be used for any reason, other options include parenteral cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, newer quinolones, macrolides, and telithromycin. Due to elevated rates of resistance in Turkey, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and tetracyclines are not recommended for empiric use in these infections.

Estudo fenotípico e genotípico da resistência aos macrolídeos de "Streptococcus pneumoniae" isolados em hospitais de Porto Alegre - RS

OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a prevalência do S. pneumoniae resistente aos macrolídeos e identificar suas características fenotípicas e genotípicas. MÉTODOS: Amostras de S. pneumoniae isoladas entre maio de 2002 e agosto de 2004, em Porto Alegre (RS), a partir de materiais clínicos coletados de diferentes sítios anatômicos foram analisadas. Para o teste de difusão em ágar foram utilizados discos de eritromicina, claritromicina, azitromicina e clindamicina. As concentrações inibitórias mínimas de eritromicina foram determinadas nos isolados resistentes aos macrolídeos pelo método de diluição em ágar. Os fenótipos dos isolados resistentes aos macrolídeos foram investigados pelo teste de difusão em ágar e a genotipagem pela reação em cadeia da polimerase. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliados 229 isolados de pneumococos, e 12 mostraram-se resistentes aos macrolídeos (5,2%). Entre estes, 9 apresentaram o fenótipo MLSB (75%) e 3 o fenótipo M (25%). A reação em cadeia da polimerase indicou que 8 isolados com o fenótipo MLSB portavam apenas o gene ermB, enquanto que o gene mefE estava presente em todos os 3 isolados com o fenótipo M. Um isolado com o fenótipo MLSB apresentou ambos os genes. CONCLUSÃO: A resistência aos macrolídeos do S. pneumoniae em Porto Alegre permanece baixa, sendo devida principalmente à presença do gene ermB, com expressão do fenótipo MLSB.

Mechanisms of macrolide resistance in clinical pneumococcal isolates in a university hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae is usually caused by the presence of the erm(B) or mef(A) resistance determinants. The aim of the present study was to identify the predominant macrolide resistance mechanisms among erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolated in a university hospital, Ankara, Turkey. A total of 669 S. pneumoniae strains were isolated from clinical specimens of patients admitted to the hospital between 1994--2002. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of penicillin G, erythromycin A and clindamycin were determined by the agar dilution method according to NCCLS guidelines. Ninety-one (13.6%) isolates were resistant to erythromycin. Erythromycin-resistant isolates were examined for their macrolide resistance phenotypes by a triple disc diffusion assay. It assigned 57 (62.6%) of the 91 erythromycin-resistant pneumococci to cMLS(B) phenotype, 19 (20.9%) to iMLS(B) phenotype and 15 (16.5%) to M phenotype. All erythromycin-resistant isolates were analyzed by PCR for the presence of erm(B) and mef(A) determinants. The isolates were characterized for the underlying resistance genotype, with 83.5% having erm(B), 16.5% having the mef(A) genotypes. This study provides further evidence of the dissemination of macrolide-resistant mutants in pneumococci as the use of new, long-acting macrolides increases. This is the first article about MLS(B) resistance phenotypes and genotypes of S. pneumoniae from Turkey and it emphasizes the need for future epidemiological monitoring of macrolide-resistant pneumococci.