Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting does not reduce lymphocyte activation

Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predicts Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation and Intensive Care Unit Stay After off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Purpose

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the primary cause of mortality in developing countries. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) offers more upside in revascularization by preventing cardiopulmonary bypass trauma and minimizing aortic manipulation. Even though cardiopulmonary bypass is not involved, OPCAB still causes a significant systemic inflammatory response. This study determines the prognostic values of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) towards perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent OPCAB surgery.

Patients and methods

This was a single-center retrospective study at the National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita, Jakarta, using secondary data from electronic medical records and medical record archives of all patients who underwent OPCAB from January 2019 through December 2021. A total of 418 medical records were obtained, and 47 patients were excluded based on the exclusion criteria. The values of SII were calculated from preoperative laboratory data of segmental neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and platelet count. Patients were divided into two groups based on the SII cutoff value of 878.056 x 10³/mm³.

Results

The baseline SII values of 371 patients were calculated, among which 63 (17%) patients had preoperative SII values of ≥878.057 x 10³/mm³. High SII values were a significant predictor of prolonged ventilation (RR 1.141, 95% CI 1.001-1.301) and prolonged ICU stay (RR 1.218, 95% CI 1.021-1.452) after OPCAB surgery. A positive correlation was observed between SII and hospital length of stay after OPCAB surgery. From the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, SII predicted prolonged ventilation duration, with an area under the curve of 0.658 (95% CI 0.575-0.741, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

High preoperative SII values are capable of predicting prolonged mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay after OPCAB surgery.

Differences of early immunological responses in on-pump versus off-pump cardiac surgery

INTRODUCTION

Cardiopulmonary bypass surgery is accompanied by an inflammatory response and pulmonary dysfunction that renders patients vulnerable to postoperative complications. The majority of studies investigating the inflammatory response in cardiopulmonary bypass focus on cytokine measurements. This study investigated the early response of peripheral blood cell types and early changes in lung tissue in on-pump versus off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

METHODS

Landrace pigs were assigned to the following groups (n = 6 per group): 1. off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass, 2. conventional cardiopulmonary bypass, 3. heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass, 4. surface-reduced cardiopulmonary bypass, and 5. surface-reduced cardiopulmonary bypass plus lung perfusion. Surgery was performed under mild hyperthermia (32°C), with 90-minute ischemia and 180-minute reperfusion. Histological and flow cytometric analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Lung water content increased during reperfusion in heparin-coated (84.63 ± 2.99%) compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (76.33 ± 4.56%, p = 0.04). Alveolar septal thickness increased during ischemia at heparin-coated (p < 0.01) and surface-reduced cardiopulmonary bypass plus lung perfusion (p = 0.05). Tumor necrosis factor expression increased significantly (p < 0.01) in peribronchial, perivascular, and peripheral lung areas in all on-pump groups, but not in off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass. The usage of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass led to increased percentages of CD3⁺CD4⁺ (p = 0.03) and CD3⁺CD8⁺ (p = 0.01) T cells compared to an uncoated device. Natural killer and mature B lymphocytes decreased at conventional and surface-reduced cardiopulmonary bypass plus lung perfusion. Activated granulocytes and macrophages increased at conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass.

CONCLUSION

Off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass induces less immunological response and lung injury than on-pump surgery. The reduction of cardiopulmonary bypass surface reduces the inflammatory immune response induced by cardiopulmonary bypass. Lung perfusion of surface-reduced cardiopulmonary bypass diminished the extravasation caused by surface reduction of the cardiopulmonary bypass.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes in high-risk patients compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and risks of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and to investigate the relationship between outcomes and patient risk profile.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and major conference proceedings databases were searched for RCTs comparing OPCAB and CABG and reporting short-term (≤ 30 days) outcomes. Endpoints assessed were all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebral stroke.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 100 studies, with a total of 19,192 subjects. There was no difference between the 2 techniques with respect to all-cause mortality and MI (odds ratio [OR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.09; P = .25; I(2) = 0% and OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77-1.05; P = .19; I(2) = 0%, respectively). OPCAB was associated with a significant 28% reduction in the odds of cerebral stroke (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92; P = .009; I(2) = 0%). A significant relationship between patient risk profile and benefits from OPCAB was found in terms of all-cause mortality (P < .01), MI (P < .01), and cerebral stroke (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

OPCAB is associated with a significant reduction in the odds of cerebral stroke compared with conventional CABG. In addition, benefits of OPCAB in terms of death, MI, and cerebral stroke are significantly related to patient risk profile, suggesting that OPCAB should be strongly considered in high-risk patients.

ISMICS Consensus Conference and Statements of Randomized Controlled Trials of Off-Pump versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Objective

At this consensus conference, we developed evidence-informed consensus statements and recommendations on the practice of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) by systematically reviewing and performing meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OPCAB and conventional coronary artery bypass (CCAB).

Methods

All RCTs of OPCAB versus CCAB through April 2013 were screened, and 102 relevant RCTs (19,101 patients) were included in a systematic review and meta-analysis (15 RCTs of 9551 high-risk patients; and 87 RCTs of 9550 low-risk patients) in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology. Consensus statements for the risks and benefits of OPCAB surgery in mortality, morbidity, and resource use were developed based on best available evidence.

Results

Compared to CCAB, it is reasonable to perform OPCAB to reduce risks of stroke [class IIa, level of evidence (LOE) A], renal dysfunction/failure (class IIa, LOE A), blood transfusion (class I, LOE A), respiratory failure (class I, LOE A), atrial fibrillation (class I, LOE A), wound infection (class I, LOE A), ventilation time, and ICU and hospital length of stay (class I, LOE A). However, OPCAB may be associated with a reduced number of grafts performed (class I, LOE A) and with diminished graft patency (class IIa, LOE A, with increased coronary reintervention at 1 year and beyond (class IIa, LOE A), as well as increased mortality at a median follow-up of 5 years (class IIb, LOE A).

Conclusions

OPCAB compared with CCAB may improve outcomes in the short-term (stroke, renal dysfunction, blood transfusion, respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation, wound infection, ventilation time, and length of stay). However, over the longer-term, OPCAB may be associated with reduced graft patency, and increased risk of cardiac re-intervention and death.

Cancer in heart disease patients: what are the limitations in the treatment strategy?

Cardiovascular disease and cancer are leading causes of morbidity and mortality, and can both be present in one patient. In patients with simultaneous disease, the most threatening disease should be treated first. This is usually heart disease, but this can pose specific problems. If percutaneous coronary intervention is preferred, bleeding and thrombotic tendencies have to be taken into account in the subsequent treatment of the malignancy. With coronary artery bypass grafting, the advantages and disadvantages of one- or two-stage procedures, and the use of extracorporeal circulation have to be balanced. Development of heart disease after treatment of malignancy could be due to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The effects of these cancer treatments have to be taken into account for the treatment options of the heart disease and the postoperative prognosis.

Risk of stroke with percutaneous coronary intervention compared with on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although some trials have reported that on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery may be associated with higher rates of stroke than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), whether stroke is more common after off-pump CABG compared with PCI is unknown. We therefore sought to determine whether off-pump CABG is associated with an increased risk of stroke compared with PCI by means of network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CABG vs PCI were searched through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and proceedings of international meetings.

RESULTS

Eighty-three RCTs with 22,729 patients randomized to on-pump CABG (n = 10,957), off-pump CABG (n = 7,119), or PCI (n = 4,653) were analyzed. Thirty-day rates of stroke were significantly lower in patients treated with PCI compared with either off-pump CABG (odds ratio [OR]; 0.39, 95% CI, 0.19-0.83) or on-pump CABG (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12-0.47). Compared with on-pump CABG, off-pump CABG was associated with significantly lower 30-day risk of stroke (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95). However, in sensitivity analyses restricted to high-quality studies, studies with more than either 100 or 1,000 patients, or studies with protocol definition or adjudication of stroke by a clinical events committee, the precision of the point estimate for the 30-day risk of stroke between off-pump vs on-pump CABG was markedly reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with lower 30-day rates of stroke than both off-pump and on-pump CABG. Further studies are required to determine whether the risk of stroke is reduced with off-pump CABG compared with on-pump CABG.

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for ischaemic heart disease

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is performed both without and with cardiopulmonary bypass, referred to as off-pump and on-pump CABG respectively. However, the preferable technique is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of off-pump versus on-pump CABG in patients with ischaemic heart disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2011), MEDLINE (OVID, 1950 to February 2011), EMBASE (OVID, 1980 to February 2011), Science Citation Index Expanded on ISI Web of Science (1970 to February 2011) and CINAHL (EBSCOhost, 1981 to February 2011) on 2 February 2011. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials of off-pump versus on-pump CABG irrespective of language, publication status and blinding were selected for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For statistical analysis of dichotomous data risk ratio (RR) and for continuous data mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used for analysis to assess the risk of random error due to sparse data and to multiple updating of accumulating data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-six trials (10,716 participants) were included. Ten trials (4,950 participants) were considered to be low risk of bias. Pooled analysis of all trials showed that off-pump CABG increased all-cause mortality compared with on-pump CABG (189/5,180 (3.7%) versus 160/5144 (3.1%); RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.53; P =.04). In the trials at low risk of bias the effect was more pronounced (154/2,485 (6.2%) versus 113/2,465 (4.6%), RR 1.35,95% CI 1.07 to 1.70; P =.01). TSA showed that the risk of random error on the result was unlikely. Off-pump CABG resulted in fewer distal anastomoses (MD -0.28; 95% CI -0.40 to -0.16, P <.00001). No significant differences in myocardial infarction, stroke, renal insufficiency, or coronary re-intervention were observed. Off-pump CABG reduced post-operative atrial fibrillation compared with on-pump CABG, however, in trials at low risk of bias, the estimated effect was not significantly different.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review did not demonstrate any significant benefit of off-pump compared with on-pump CABG regarding mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction. In contrast, we observed better long-term survival in the group of patients undergoing on-pump CABG with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest. Based on the current evidence, on-pump CABG should continue to be the standard surgical treatment. However, off-pump CABG may be acceptable when there are contraindications for cannulation of the aorta and cardiopulmonary bypass. Further randomised clinical trials should address the optimal treatment in such patients.

Effect of Cardiopulmonary Bypass on Cancer Prognosis

Adverse effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on cancer prognosis are expected but have not been confirmed. Seventy-four cancer patients who underwent cardiac surgery before cancer therapy were followed up for 42 ± 37 months; 45 had cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. There was no significant difference in cancer recurrence (40.0%) and deaths (26.7%) among patients who had cardiopulmonary bypass and those who underwent off-pump cardiac surgery (27.6% and 24.1%). There were no significant differences in freedom from cancer-related death at 2 and 5 years after cardiac surgery (78.4% and 68.5%) in the cardiopulmonary bypass group compared to the 29 off-pump group (81.8% and 58.3%). Despite some limitations, this study detected no significant adverse effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on cancer prognosis. Although these results do not verify the safety of cardiopulmonary bypass from an oncologic aspect, they suggest it can be applied in cancer patients who require cardiac surgery.

Clinical outcomes in randomized trials of off- vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses

AIMS

To assess the clinical outcomes of off- vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in randomized trials.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched electronic databases and bibliographies until June 2007. Trials were assessed for risk of bias. Outcome measures were all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation, and renewed coronary revascularization at maximum follow-up. We applied trial sequential analysis to estimate the strength of evidence. We found 66 randomized trials. There was no statistically significant differences regarding mortality [relative risk (RR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-1.44], myocardial infarction (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.65-1.37), or renewed coronary revascularization (RR 1.34; 95% CI 0.83-2.18). We found a significant reduced risk of atrial fibrillation (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.57-0.83) and stroke (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.31-0.91) in off-pump patients. However, when continuity correction for zero-event trials was included, the reduction in stroke became insignificant (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.32-1.19). Trial sequential analysis demonstrated overwhelming evidence supporting that off-pump bypass surgery reduces atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSION

Off-pump surgery reduces the risks of postoperative atrial fibrillation compared with on-pump surgery. For death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and renewed coronary revascularization, the evidence is still weak and more low-bias risk trials are needed.

A phase I trial of oxaliplatin for intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion for the treatment of peritoneal surface dissemination from colorectal and appendiceal cancers

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemoperfusion (IPHC) has evolved into a promising approach for peritoneal surface malignancy. A large body of literature suggests that oxaliplatin has excellent cytotoxicity against colorectal cancer. Therefore, we undertook a phase I evaluation of IPHC with oxaliplatin for peritoneal dissemination from colorectal and appendiceal cancers to establish the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD).

METHODS

Cohorts of three patients underwent cytoreductive surgery followed by a 2-h IPHC with escalating doses of oxaliplatin at a target outflow temperature of 40 degrees C. The initial peritoneal oxaliplatin dose was 200 mg/M(2) with increases planned in 50 mg/M(2 )increments. Plasma and perfusate samples were collected during the IPHC and evaluated using emission spectrometry techniques. Normal tissue and tumor samples were collected before and after the IPHC for analysis. DLT was defined as a grade 3 toxicity lasting 5 days.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were enrolled at two dose levels. Peritoneal fluid areas under the curve (AUCs) were above those of plasma. Additionally, intratumoral oxaliplatin was similar to that of surrounding normal tissue. Dose-limiting toxicities at 250 mg/M(2 )were observed in two of three patients enrolled in this study.

CONCLUSION

We found that IPHC with 200 mg/M(2 )of oxaliplatin is well tolerated and is the MTD for a 2-h chemoperfusion. Higher doses are not feasible with this perfusion protocol given the significant toxicities associated with 250 mg/M(2 )oxaliplatin. Based on the data from this phase I study, we propose to conduct further studies with oxaliplatin delivered at 200 mg/M(2).