Optimal antiplatelet treatment for percutaneous coronary intervention: Clopidogrel vs. ticlopidine

Synthesis and Molecular Docking of New Thiophene Derivatives as Lactate Dehydrogenase-A Inhibitors

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

A series of novel derivatives possessing the thiophene moiety were synthesized using ethyl 5'-amino-2,3'-bithiophene-4'-carboxylate as the starting material.

METHODS

The new synthesized derivatives were screened as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) inhibitors. LDH plays an important role in glucose metabolism in cancer cells and can affect tumor genesis and metastasis.

RESULTS

3-Substituted p-tolylthieno[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4(3H)-ones 4 were the most potent inhibitors in this study compared to Galloflavin reference drug.

CONCLUSION

Molecular docking studies on the Human Lactate Dehydrogenase active site were carried out on the synthesized compounds and the MolDock scores ranged between -127 to -171.

Efficacy and safety of triple antiplatelet therapy in obese patients undergoing stent implantation

We evaluated the impact of triple antiplatelet therapy on platelet reactivity, reducing cardiovascular events and the safety in obese patients undergoing coronary stenting. Obese patients (n = 428) undergoing coronary stenting were randomly assigned to 2 groups: standard dual group (clopidogrel plus aspirin, n = 215) and triple group (n = 213); adjunctive cilostazol was added to the dual group treatment. Platelet reactivity was assessed at baseline and at 1-year follow-up by conventional aggregometry. Major adverse cardiovascular events, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization, and bleeding events were analyzed after 1-year follow-up. At 1-year follow-up after stenting, major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic-driven TLR were lower in the triple group than the dual group. Major bleeding was similar in both the groups. In obese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, triple antiplatelet therapy was superior to dual antiplatelet therapy in decreasing thrombotic events in 12-month cardiac events, mainly driven by a decrease in the incidence of clopidogrel resistance.

Antiplatelet therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention: a critical review of the 2007 AHA/ACC/SCAI guidelines and beyond

Antiplatelet therapy is a mainstay in the treatment of patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although the 2007 PCI treatment guidelines were published by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, new clinical evidence has emerged, expanding our understanding of antiplatelet use and potentially affecting the treatment guidelines. For example, clinical trial results prompted a Science Advisory to recommend that dual therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel be used for longer periods-up to 1 year in patients who receive bare metal stents and at least 1 year in patients receiving drug-eluting stents. New trial results have also emerged regarding the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists such as abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban. This article reviews the current recommendations for antiplatelet therapy in PCI patients, recent trial results, newly developed agents, ongoing clinical trials, and the future direction of antiplatelet therapy in patients who undergo PCI.

The clopidogrel resistance can be attenuated with triple antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing drug-eluting stents implantation

BACKGROUND

Triple antiplatelet therapy may have a beneficial effect on prevention of thrombotic complication in patients undergoing coronary stenting. We investigated the prevalence of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance in patients treated with dual and triple antiplatelet regimen after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES).

METHODS

A total of 400 consecutive patients underwent successful PCI with DES were randomly assigned to therapy with dual antiplatelet regimens (aspirin plus clopidogrel, Group I, n = 200) and triple antiplatelet regimens (aspirin plus clopidogrel plus cilostazol, Group II, n = 200) At two weeks after PCI, aspirin and clopidogrel resistance were assayed in 379 patients (Group I, n = 186; Group II, n = 193) by using the VerifyNow System.

RESULTS

In Group I, 21 (11.3%) patients had aspirin resistance and 74 (40.0%) had clopidogrel resistance. In Group II, 19 (9.8%) were resistant to aspirin and 38 (19.7%) to clopidogrel. The aspirin reaction unit (ARU) was not significantly different between groups (448+/-67 vs. 439+/-64, P = 0.200), but the percent inhibition of clopidogrel was higher in Group II (41.4+/-24.3%,) comparing with that of Group I (26.5+/-18.7%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

With triple antiplatelet therapy, the prevalence of clopidogrel resistance can be attenuated in patients undergoing PCI with DES.