Antimicrobial activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam tested against Gram-Negative organisms from Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America

A Rare Cause of Coagulopathy in the Emergency Department: Cefoperazone Use

Cefoperazone (CPZ) is an antibiotic widely used for moderate to severe infections, especially in countries where resources are difficult to access. This case report aimed to draw attention to coagulopathy, a potential side effect of CPZ. This side effect can cause high mortality and morbidity in patients. In the mechanism of CPZ causing coagulopathy, it is reported that effects such as binding to vitamin K, disrupting vitamin K metabolism, and preventing platelet aggregation are responsible. In this presentation, a case who came to the emergency department with the complaint of hematuria caused by coagulopathy after the use of CPZ-containing antibiotics (CPZ + sulbactam) is presented.

Antibiotic Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections in View of the Newly Developed β-Lactams: A Narrative Review of the Existing Evidence

It is estimated that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is responsible for nearly 5 million human deaths worldwide each year and will reach 10 million by 2050. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections represent the fourth-leading cause of death attributable to antimicrobial resistance globally, but a standardized therapy is still lacking. Among the antibiotics under consideration, Sulbactam/durlobactam seems to be the best candidate to replace current back-bone agents. Cefiderocol could play a pivotal role within combination therapy regimens. Due to toxicity and the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) limitations, colistin (or polymyxin B) should be used as an alternative agent (when no other options are available). Tigecycline (or minocycline) and fosfomycin could represent suitable partners for both NBLs. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are needed to better evaluate the role of NBLs in CRAB infection treatment and to compare the efficacy of tigecycline and fosfomycin as partner antibiotics. Synergism should be tested between NBLs and "old" drugs (rifampicin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole). Huge efforts should be made to accelerate pre-clinical and clinical studies on safer polymyxin candidates with improved lung activity, as well as on the iv rifabutin formulation. In this narrative review, we focused the antibiotic treatment of CRAB infections in view of newly developed β-lactam agents (NBLs).

Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin and Combinations of Cephalosporins with β-Lactamase Inhibitors as an Advancement in Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

In an era of increasing antibiotic resistance among pathogens, the treatment options for infectious diseases are diminishing. One of the clinical groups especially vulnerable to this threat are patients who are hospitalized in intensive care units due to ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. In order to prevent the exhaustion of therapeutic options for this life-threatening condition, there is an urgent need for new pharmaceuticals. Novel β-lactam antibiotics, including combinations of cephalosporins with β-lactamase inhibitors, are proposed as a solution to this escalating problem. The unique mechanism of action, distinctive to this new group of siderophore cephalosporins, can overcome multidrug resistance, which is raising high expectations. In this review, we present the summarized results of clinical trials, in vitro studies, and case studies on the therapeutic efficacy of cefoperazone-sulbactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and cefiderocol in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. We demonstrate that treatment strategies based on siderophore cephalosporins and combinations of β-lactams with β-lactamases inhibitors show comparable or higher clinical efficacy than those used with classic pharmaceuticals, like carbapenems, colistin, or tigecycline, and are often associated with a lower risk of adverse events.

Montelukast and cefoperazone act as antiquorum sensing and antibiofilm agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

AIMS

Drug repurposing is an attractive strategy to control biofilm-related infectious diseases. In this study, two drugs (montelukast and cefoperazone) with well-established therapeutic applications were tested on Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing (QS) inhibition and biofilm control.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The activity of montelukast and cefoperazone was evaluated for Pqs signal inhibition, pyocyanin synthesis, and prevention and eradication of Ps. aeruginosa biofilms. Cefoperazone inhibited the Pqs system by hindering the production of the autoinducer molecules 2-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline (HHQ) and 2-heptyl-3-hydroxy-4(1H)-quinolone (the Pseudomonas quinolone signal or PQS), corroborating in silico results. Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyocyanin production was reduced by 50%. The combination of the antibiotics cefoperazone and ciprofloxacin was synergistic for Ps. aeruginosa biofilm control. On the other hand, montelukast had no relevant effects on the inhibition of the Pqs system and against Ps. aeruginosa biofilm.

CONCLUSION

This study provides for the first time strong evidence that cefoperazone interacts with the Pqs system, hindering the formation of the autoinducer molecules HHQ and PQS, reducing Ps. aeruginosa pathogenicity and virulence. Cefoperazone demonstrated a potential to be used in combination with less effective antibiotics (e.g. ciprofloxacin) to potentiate the biofilm control action.

Efficacy and safety of generic cefoperazone/sulbactam versus branded cefoperazone/sulbactam in the treatment of bacterial infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aim to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of generic cefoperazone/sulbactam compared to the branded cefoperazone/sulbactam (Sulperazon) in treating bacterial infections through a meta-analysis. Searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, VIP databases, and Clinical Trials database, resulting in the inclusion of 11 studies comprising 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 retrospective cohort studies (RCSs). Meta-analysis of the RCTs indicated no statistical differences in clinical success rates, clinical cure rates, microbiological eradication rates, and incidence of adverse reactions between the generic cefoperazone/sulbactam and the branded version. Findings from the RCSs aligned with those from the RCTs, demonstrating that generic versions of cefoperazone/sulbactam are equivalent in efficacy and safety to their branded counterparts in treating bacterial infections.

In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility data of global meropenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates causing pneumonia: Data from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance Program, 2014-2021, and re-estimations of susceptibility breakpoints and appropriate dosages of important antibiotics for pneumonia treatment

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the susceptibility of globally pneumonia-causing meropenem-resistant (MEM-R) Acinetobacter baumannii isolates against important antibiotics and estimate appropriate dosages of indicated antibiotics.

METHODS

We extracted the 2014-2021 Antimicrobial Testing of Leadership Surveillance database regarding the susceptibility of MEM-R A. baumannii isolates causing pneumonia against important antibiotics. The susceptibility and carbapenemase-encoding gene (CPEG) data of pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates from patients hospitalized in intensive care units of five major regions were analyzed. The susceptibility breakpoints (SBP) recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) in 2022, other necessary criteria [SBP of MIC for colistin, 2 mg/L, in the CLSI 2018; and cefoperazone-sulbactam (CFP-SUL), 16 mg/L], and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of indicated antibiotics were employed.

RESULTS

Applying the aforementioned criteria, we observed the susceptible rates of colistin, minocycline, and CFP-SUL against the pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates globally (n = 2905) were 93.2%, 69.1%, and 26.3%, respectively. Minocycline was significantly more active in vitro (MIC ≤4 mg/L) against the pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates collected from North and South America compared to those from other regions (>90% vs. 58-72%). Additionally, blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-72 were the predominant CPEG in pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

After deliberative estimations, dosages of 200 mg minocycline intravenously every 12 h (SBP, 8 mg/L), 100 mg tigecycline intravenously every 12 h (SBP, 1 mg/L), and 160 mg nebulized colistin methanesulphonate every 8 h (SBP, 2 mg/L) are needed for the effective treatment of pneumonia-causing MEM-R A. baumannii isolates.

To screen or not to screen medical students for carriage of multidrug-resistant pathogens?

BACKGROUND

The carriage of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens in medical students has not been studied extensively, despite the fact that they are in contact with patients and exposed to a hospital environment.

AIM

To investigate the intestinal and nasal carriage of MDR pathogens among medical students and its association with their lifestyle and demographic data.

METHODS

In 2021, first- and final-year medical students were invited to the study. Two rectal swabs were used for detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing, colistin-, tigecycline- or carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Nasal swab was used for Staphylococcus aureus culture. S. aureus isolates were characterized by spa typing; Gram-negative resistant isolates and meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) were subjected to whole-genome short and/or long sequencing.

FINDINGS

From 178 students, 80 (44.9%) showed nasal carriage of S. aureus; two isolates were MRSA. In rectal swabs, seven ESBL-producing strains were detected. Sixteen students were colonized by colistin-resistant bacteria, three isolates carried the mcr-1 gene (1.7%). The mcr-9 (10.7%, 19/178) and mcr-10 (2.2%, 4/178) genes were detected by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, but only two colistin-susceptible mcr-10-positive isolates were cultured. The S. aureus nasal carriage was negatively associated with antibiotic and probiotic consumption. S. aureus and colistin-resistant bacteria were detected more frequently among students in contact with livestock.

CONCLUSION

Medical students can be colonized by (multi)drug-resistant bacteria with no difference between first- and final-year students. The participation of students in self-screening increases their awareness of possible colonization by resistant strains and their potential transmission due to poor hand hygiene.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia in Hospitalized adult patients

Cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia is associated with longer hospital stays and increased risk of death. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting the occurrence of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia in hospitalized adult patients. This retrospective cohort study involved hospitalized adult patients at Xi'an Central Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 based on the Chinese pharmacovigilance system developed and established by the Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Center in China. Independent predictors of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia were obtained using multivariate logistic regression and were used to develop and establish the nomogram. According to the same standard, the clinical data of hospitalized patients using cefoperazone/sulbactam at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical University from January 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023 were collected as the external validation group. The 893 hospitalized patients included 95 who were diagnosed with cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia. Our study enrolled 610 patients: 427 in the training group and 183 in the internal validation group. The independent predictors of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia were surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 5.279, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.597-10.729), baseline platelet count ≤50×109/L (OR = 2.492, 95% CI = 1.110-5.593), baseline hepatic dysfunction (OR = 12.362, 95% CI = 3.277-46.635), cumulative defined daily doses (OR = 1.162, 95% CI = 1.162-1.221) and nutritional risk (OR = 16.973, 95% CI = 7.339-39.254). The areas under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic for the training and internal validation groups were 0.909 (95% CI = 0.875-0.943) and 0.888 (95% CI = 0.832-0.944), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow tests yielded p = 0.475 and p = 0.742 for the training and internal validation groups, respectively, confirming the goodness of fit of the nomogram model. In the external validation group (n = 221), the nomogram was equally robust in cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia (AUC = 0.837, 95%CI = 0.736-0.938). The nomogram model constructed in this study had good predictive performance and extrapolation, which can help clinicians to identify patients at high risk of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia early. This will be useful in preventing the occurrence of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced hypoprothrombinaemia and allowing timely intervention measures to be performed.

Screening for Metallo-Beta-Lactamases Using Non-Carbapenem Agents: Effective Detection of MBL-Producing Enterobacterales and Differentiation of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales

Metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) are enzymes that break down carbapenem antibiotics, leading to carbapenem-resistant organisms. Carbapenemase-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is one of them. Outbreaks of CRE infection can occur in healthcare facilities and lead to increased deaths, illness, and medical costs. This study was conducted to detect MBLs using non-carbapenem agents and exclude MBLs among CRE isolates. A total of 3776 non-duplicate sequential Enterobacterales isolates from a single facility were screened between January 2019 and December 2022 using non-carbapenem agents, ceftazidime and cefoperazone/sulbactam. Positive 153 isolates (4.0%) were further tested using carbapenemase-confirmation tests and verified through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. Fifteen imipenemase (IMP)-type MBL-producing Enterobacterales (0.4%) including one susceptible to carbapenems were identified. Moreover, 160 isolates (4.2%) meeting the criteria for CRE were directly subjected to PCR testing. All fourteen CRE isolates with MBLs identified through PCR testing were found to be the same strains screened using ceftazidime and cefoperazone/sulbactam. Screening using ceftazidime and cefoperazone/sulbactam can effectively detect MBL-producing Enterobacterales strains. This screening method showed comparable results to screening with meropenem, potentially serving as a supplementary approach and contributing to differentiating between MBL- and non-MBL-producing CRE strains. Our findings support these screening methods, particularly in regions where IMP-type MBLs are prevalent.

Geographic patterns of Acinetobacter baumannii and carbapenem resistance in the Asia-Pacific Region: results from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program, 2012-2019

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the geographic distribution of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-AB) isolates in the Asia-Pacific region.

METHODS

We collected A. baumannii isolates using the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program from 2012 to 2019. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the isolates were determined using the broth microdilution method. The major carbapenemase genes were identified using multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays for the isolates collected between 2012 and 2014. CR-AB was defined as isolates with meropenem MICs ≥8 mg/l.

RESULTS

In total, 2674 A. baumannii isolates were collected from 13 countries, of which 1918 (71.7%) were CR-AB. The carbapenem resistance rates among A. baumannii isolates were as low as 2.8% and 6.5% in Japan and Australia, respectively, but as high as 88% and 87.2% in South Korea and India, respectively. Of the 232 CR-AB isolates that underwent carbapenemase gene screening, 224 (96.6%) harbored at least one carbapenemase gene. A total of 226 carbapenemase genes were detected, with bla_OXA-23 (94.7%, 214/226) being the most dominant, followed by bla_OXA-72 (2.7%, 6/226), bla_OXA-58 (2.2%, 5/226), and bla_NDM-1 (0.4%, 1/226). CR-AB isolates had >80% resistance to amikacin, ampicillin/sulbactam, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and piperacillin/tazobactam. The rates of CR-AB resistance to minocycline and colistin were 7.2% (31/429) and 1.7% (23/1368). For cefoperazone/sulbactam and tigecycline, 50.2% (527/1049) and 93.3% (1789/1918) of CR-AB isolates had an MIC ≤16 mg/l and ≤2 mg/l, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii showed significant differences among countries in the Asia-Pacific region, and the treatment options were limited.

Case report: Cefoperazone-sulbactam induced Kounis syndrome and cardiogenic shock

BACKGROUND

Kounis syndrome is a hypersensitive coronary artery disease caused by the body's exposure to allergens, which is induced by various drugs and environmental factors. This entity has been described primarily in isolated case reports and case series. We report a case of type III Kounis syndrome caused by cefoperazone-sulbactam.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 79-year-old man who received an infusion of cefoperazone-sulbactam in Respiratory Department of our hospital for recurrent infections. 28 minutes later, he developed skin flushing of the trunk and extremities, soon followed by loss of consciousness and shock. With antianaphylaxis, pressor therapy, and fluid rehydration, the patient was admitted to the ICU for treatment. During which, he experienced recurrent ventricular fibrillation and a progressive increase in troponin I levels. The ECG of the patient showed that the ST segment elevation of lead II, III, avF, and V3R-V5R was 0.10-0.20 MV. An urgent coronary angiography showed an in-stent thrombosis in the middle part of the right coronary artery, occlusion of the distal flow with TIMI grade 0. The diagnosis was type III Kounis syndrome with cardiogenic shock. Despite aggressive treatment, the patient died on day 7 after ICU admission.

CONCLUSION

Kunis syndrome is a life-threatening disease, and therefore allergic reactions in patients with a history of cephalosporin allergy and coronary stent implantation should be considered and treated promptly.

Geographic patterns of global isolates of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and the activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and comparators against these isolates: Results from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program, 2020

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a growing threat to public health. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-KP) and the associated carbapenemase genes using data from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program, 2020. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the broth microdilution method, and carbapenemase genes were detected using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints were used for interpretation of susceptibility. A total of 6753 K. pneumoniae isolates were collected from 57 countries in six regions worldwide. Of these, 1118 (16.6%) were CR-KP isolates. Among 1079 of the tested CR-KP isolates, 1017 (94.3%) had at least one of the class A (41.0%, 417/1017), B (39.3%, 400/1017), and D (38.8%, 395/1017) carbapenemase genes. The resistance patterns and associated genes differed significantly between the participating countries. India, Greece, and Argentina had the highest rates of carbapenem resistance. Susceptibility to the β-lactamase inhibitor combination, ceftazidime/avibactam was greater than that to meropenem/vaborbactam in all K. pneumoniae (93.7% vs. 90.3%, P < 0.05), CR-KP (63.3% vs. 41.5%, P < 0.05), CR-KP with genes for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-like carbapenemase (99.5% vs. 96.0%, P < 0.05), oxacillinase-like carbapenemase (98.7% vs. 4.6%, P < 0.05), and CR-KP without carbapenemase genes (93.5% vs. 79.0%, P < 0.05). CR-KP was the only exception with class B carbapenemase, with susceptibility rates of 1.4% and 9.4% to ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem/vaborbactam, respectively (P < 0.05). Overall, surveillance results are important for guiding empirical antimicrobial therapy in different regions and for monitoring the global transmission of CR-KP with varying resistance mechanisms.

Treatment of MDR Gram-Negative Bacteria Infections: Ongoing and Prospective

Antimicrobial resistance is a serious public health concern across the world. Gram-negative resistance has propagated over the globe via various methods, the most challenging of which include extended-spectrum β-lactamases, carbapenemases, and AmpC enzymes. Gram-negative bacterial infections are difficult to treat in critically extremely sick persons. Resistance to different antibiotic treatments nearly always lowers the probability of proper empirical coverage, sometimes resulting in severe outcomes. Multidrug resistance can be combated with varying degrees of success using a combination of older drugs with high toxicity levels and novel therapeutics. The current therapies for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are discussed in this review, which includes innovative medications, older pharmaceuticals, creative combinations of the two, and therapeutic targets.

Correlation Between Cefoperazone/Sulbactam MIC Values and Clinical Outcomes of Escherichia coli Bacteremia

INTRODUCTION

The clinical efficiency of cefoperazone/sulbactam (CPZ/SUL) against Escherichia coli bacteremia was unknown. This study aimed to explore the relationship between CPZ/SUL MIC values and clinical outcomes in Escherichia coli bacteremia.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in Taiwan between January 2015 and December 2020. Patients treated with CPZ/SUL for E. coli bacteremia were enrolled in the analysis. The CPZ/SUL MICs were determined by using the agar dilution method. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Among 247 isolates, 160 (64.8%) isolates were susceptible, 8 (3.2%) were intermediate, and 79 (32.0%) were resistant to cefoperazone. The activity of cefoperazone against cefoperazone-non-susceptible E. coli (n = 87) was restored upon combination with sulbactam, with susceptibility ranging from 0% to 97.7%. The 30-day mortality was 4.5% (11/247) and overall clinical success rate was 91.9% (227/247). Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model revealed that heart failure [adjusted relative risk (ARR), 5.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-23.02; p = 0.020], malignancy (ARR 7.50; 95% CI 2.02-27.80; p = 0.003), SOFA score (ARR 1.29; 95% CI 1.09-1.52; p = 0.003), and CPZ/SUL MIC ≥ 64 mg/L (ARR 11.31; 95% CI 1.34-95.52; p = 0.026) were independently associated with 30-day mortality. No statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality were found between groups with or without cefoperazone susceptibility (3.4% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.751, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with E. coli bacteremia who were treated with CPZ/SUL had a favorable outcome when the MICs of the isolates were ≤ 16 mg/L and a high risk of mortality with MICs ≥ 64 mg/L.

Model-Informed Drug Development of New Cefoperazone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium Combination (3:1): Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis and Antibacterial Efficacy Against Enterobacteriaceae

Objective: Cefoperazone/sulbactam is a commonly used antibiotic combination against the extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing bacteria. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new cefoperazone/sulbactam combination (3:1) for Enterobacteriaceae infection via model-informed drug development (MIDD) approaches.

Methods: Sulperazon [cefoperazone/sulbactam (2:1)] was used as a control. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data was collected from a clinical phase I trial. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using two-fold broth microdilution method. The percent time that the free drug concentration exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT_>MIC) was used as the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indicator correlated with efficacy. Models were developed to characterize the PK profile of cefoperazone and sulbactam. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to determine the investigational regimens of cefoperazone/sulbactam (3:1) for the treatment of infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae based on the probability of target attainment (PTA) against the tested bacteria.

Results: Two 2-compartment models were developed to describe the PK profiles of cefoperazone and sulbactam. Simulation results following the single-dose showed that the regimens of cefoperazone/sulbactam combinations in the ratios of 3:1 and 2:1 achieved similar PTA against the tested bacteria. Simulation results from the multiple-dose showed that the dosing regimen of cefoperazone/sulbactam (4 g, TID, 3 g:1 g) showed slightly better antibacterial effect than cefoperazone/sulbactam (6 g, BID, 4 g:2 g) against the Escherichia coli (ESBL⁻) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL⁻). For the other tested bacteria, the above regimens achieved a similar PTA.

Conclusions: Cefoperazone/sulbactam (3:1) showed similar bactericidal activity to sulperazon [cefoperazone/sulbactam (2:1)] against the tested bacteria. For the ESBL-producing and cefoperazone-resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae, Cefoperazone/sulbactam (3:1) did not exhibit advantage as anticipated. Our study indicated that further clinical trials should be carried out cautiously to avoid the potential risks of not achieving the expected target.

Optimal Dose of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam for Acute Bacterial Infection in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

The optimal dosage of cefoperazone-sulbactam for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate two treatment strategies of cefoperazone-sulbactam–2 g/2 g twice daily and adjusted dose according to renal function for patients with CKD. A total of 155 patients with CKD received cefoperazone-sulbactam either at a dose of 2 g/2 g twice daily (study group) or adjusted according to renal function (control group) for the treatment of acute bacterial infection. The primary outcome was the clinical response rate at day 14 and the secondary outcomes included treatment failure and all-cause death. The study group had a higher clinical response rate (80.0% vs. 65.0%) and a lower treatment failure rate (4.0% vs. 23.8%) as compared with the control group. Further multivariable analysis showed that compared with the control group, the study group had a higher clinical response rate (adjusted OR = 4.02; 95% CI, 1.49–10.81) and lower treatment failure rate (adjusted OR = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01–0.28). In addition, no significant difference in all-cause mortality was observed between the study and the control group (adjusted OR = 1.95; 95% CI, 0.57–6.66). Finally, no significant difference was observed between the study and the control group in the risk of the adverse events (AEs)–diarrhea (p = 0.326), eosinophilia (p = 1.000), prolonged PT (p = 0.674), alteration in renal function (p = 0.938) and leukopenia (n = 0.938). In conclusion, cefoperazone-sulbactam at a dose of 2 g/2 g twice daily could achieve better clinical efficacy than the reduced dosage regimen. Additionally, this dosage did not increase the risk of AE compared to the reduced dose. Therefore, cefoperazone-sulbactam at a dose of 2 g/2 g twice daily is an effective and safe regimen for acute bacterial infection in patients with CKD.

Repressed Central Carbon Metabolism and Its Effect on Related Metabolic Pathways in Cefoperazone/Sulbactam-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Metabolic shift and antibiotic resistance have been reported in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, the global metabolic characteristics remain largely unknown. The present study characterizes the central carbon metabolism and its effect on other metabolic pathways in cefoperazone-sulbactam (SCF)-resistant P. aeruginosa (PA-R_SCF). GC-MS-based metabolomics shows a repressed central carbon metabolism in PA-R_SCF, which is confirmed by measuring expression of genes and activity of enzymes in the metabolism. Furthermore, expression of the genes that encode the enzymes for the first step of fatty acid biosynthesis, glutamate metabolism, and electron transport chain is reduced, confirmed by their enzymatic activity assay, and the key enzyme for riboflavin metabolism is also reduced, indicating the decreased metabolic flux to the four related metabolic pathways. Moreover, the role of the reduced riboflavin metabolism, being related to ROS generation, in SCF resistance is explored. Exogenous H₂O₂ potentiates SCF-mediated killing in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that the decreased ROS resulted from the reduced riboflavin metabolism that contributed to the resistance. These results indicate that the repressed central carbon metabolism and related riboflavin metabolism contribute to SCF resistance, but increasing ROS can restore SCF sensitivity. These findings characterize the repressed central carbon metabolism and its effect on other metabolic pathways as the global metabolic features in PA-R_SCF.

Chronic wound isolates and their minimum inhibitory concentrations against third generation cephalosporins at a tertiary hospital in Uganda

Globally, the burden of chronic wound infections is likely to increase due to the rising levels of bacterial resistance to antibiotics. In the United States of America alone, more than 6.5 million chronic wounds with evidence of bacterial infection are diagnosed every year. In addition, the polymicrobial environment in chronic wound infections has been observed from several studies as a risk factor for development of resistance to many antibiotics including the third generation cephalosporins currently used in Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital for treatment of chronic wound infections. Therefore the main objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of chronic wound isolates and their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) against third generation cephalosporins. This study was a cross-sectional descriptive and analytical survey of bacterial isolates from chronic wound infection among 75 study participants admitted in the surgical ward of Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), a tertiary Hospital in Western Uganda. Standard laboratory bacterial culture and identification techniques as well as broth microdilution method were used to isolate, identify pathogens and test for MIC respectively. We found that 69/75 study participants had samples with bacterial growth and the most prevalent pathogens isolated were staphylococcus aureus (40.6%) and Klebsiella spp. (29%). Generally, most isolates were susceptible to cefoperazone + sulbactum 2 g (Sulcef) and ceftriaxone 1 g (Epicephin). The overall prevalence of isolates in chronic wound infection among patients admitted in the surgical ward of MRRH was 92% and the most prevalent isolates were Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella species and proteus species respectively. The observed MIC values were higher than the CLSI clinical breakpoint, implying a decreasing trend in susceptibility of chronic wound isolates to third generation cephalosporins.

Current and future perspectives in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections

Microbial resistance is a serious threat to human health worldwide. Among the World Health Organisation's list of priority resistant bacteria, three are listed as critical-the highest level of concern-and all three are Gram-negative. Gram-negative resistance has spread worldwide via a variety of mechanisms, the most problematic being via AmpC enzymes, extended-spectrum β-lactamases, and carbapenemases. A combination of older drugs, many with high levels of toxicity, and newer agents are being used to combat multidrug resistance, with varying degrees of success. This review discusses the current treatments for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, including new agents, older compounds, and new combinations of both, and some new treatment targets that are currently under investigation.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators against bacterial isolates collected in South Korea as part of the ATLAS global surveillance program (2016-2018)

Overall, 1,277 Enterobacterales and 296 P. aeruginosa isolates were collected in South Korea between 2016 and 2018. Rates of susceptibility were >95% to ceftazidime-avibactam, tigecycline, meropenem and amikacin among the Enterobacterales and of the P. aeruginosa collected, 92.9% were susceptibility to amikacin and 92.6% to ceftazidime-avibactam.

Systematic Review of Antimicrobial Combination Options for Pandrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Antimicrobial combinations are at the moment the only potential treatment option for pandrug-resistant A. baumannii. A systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Scopus for studies reporting the activity of antimicrobial combinations against A. baumannii resistant to all components of the combination. The clinical relevance of synergistic combinations was assessed based on concentrations achieving synergy and PK/PD models. Eighty-four studies were retrieved including 818 eligible isolates. A variety of combinations (n = 141 double, n = 9 triple) were tested, with a variety of methods. Polymyxin-based combinations were the most studied, either as double or triple combinations with cell-wall acting agents (including sulbactam, carbapenems, glycopeptides), rifamycins and fosfomycin. Non-polymyxin combinations were predominantly based on rifampicin, fosfomycin, sulbactam and avibactam. Several combinations were synergistic at clinically relevant concentrations, while triple combinations appeared more active than the double ones. However, no combination was consistently synergistic against all strains tested. Notably, several studies reported synergy but at concentrations unlikely to be clinically relevant, or the concentration that synergy was observed was unclear. Selecting the most appropriate combinations is likely strain-specific and should be guided by in vitro synergy evaluation. Furthermore, there is an urgent need for clinical studies on the efficacy and safety of such combinations.

Clinical Efficacy of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam in the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the usefulness of cefoperazone-sulbactam and that of piperacillin-tazobactam in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

Methods

This retrospective study included the adult patients receiving cefoperazone-sulbactam or piperacillin-tazobactam against HAP/VAP in nine hospitals in Taiwan from March 1, 2018 to May 30, 2019. Primary outcome was clinical cure rate.

Results

A total of 410 patients were enrolled. Among them, 209 patients received cefoperazone-sulbactam and 201 patients received piperacillin-tazobactam. Overall, cefoperazone-sulbactam group had similar distribution of age, sex, or SOFA scores as piperacillin-tazobactam group. However, cefoperazone-sulbactam had higher comorbidity score and disease severity than piperacillin-tazobactam group (Charlson score: 6.5 ± 2.9 vs 5.7 ± 2.7, p < 0.001; APACHE II score: 21.4 ± 6.2 vs 19.3 ± 6.0, p = 0.002). Regarding clinical outcomes, no significant difference in clinical cure and failure rates was observed between cefoperazone-sulbactam and piperacillin-tazobactam group (clinical cure rate: 80.9% vs 80.1% and clinical failure rate: 17.2% vs 18.4%, p = 0.943). Moreover, no significant difference in clinical effectiveness and ineffectiveness rates was observed between cefoperazone-sulbactam and piperacillin-tazobactam group (clinical effective rate: 80.9% vs 80.6% and clinical ineffective rate: 17.7% vs 18.9%, p = 0.711). The all-cause mortality rates of the cefoperazone-sulbactam and piperacillin-tazobactam groups were similar (23.9% vs 20.9%, p = 0.48). After adjustment of Charlson score and APACHE II score, the similarities in these clinical outcomes did not change in overall patients and patients with HAP or VAP.

Conclusion

For treating adult patients with nosocomial pneumonia, cefoperazone-sulbactam was as effective as piperacillin-tazobactam.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Cefoperazone-Sulbactam in Treatment of Intra-Abdominal Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam against alternative antibiotics in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, and CKNI databases were searched for relevant articles up to November 25, 2020. The primary outcome was clinical efficacy rate, and the secondary outcomes were microbiologic eradication rate, mortality rate, and adverse event (AE) risk. Results: Twelve studies involving 1,674 patients were included. Overall, the clinical efficacy rate of cefoperazone-sulbactam and comparators was 87.7% and 81.7%, respectively, and cefoperazone-sulbactam was associated with a higher clinical efficacy rate than that the comparator (odds ratio [OR] 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-3.00; I² = 36%). Additionally, cefoperazone-sulbactam was associated with a lower clinical failure rate (OR 0.40; 95% CI 0.28-0.57; I² = 0) and a higher clinical cure rate (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.17-2.03; I² = 0) than the comparators. Cefoperazone-sulbactam was associated with a higher microbiologic eradication rate than the comparator (OR 2.54; 95% CI 1.72-3.76; I² = 0). Finally, there was no significant difference between cefoperazone-sulbactam and the comparators in terms of mortality rate (OR 090; 95% CI 0.38-2.16; I² = 0) and AE risk (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.74-1.55; I² = 0). Conclusions: The clinical efficacy and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam were similar to those of alternative antibiotics in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. Therefore, cefoperazone-sulbactam could be recommended as an effective and safe antibiotic for treating intra-abdominal infections.

Cefoperazone/sulbactam: New composites against multiresistant gram negative bacteria?

Sulbactam, a class A β-lactamase inhibitor, added to cefoperazone either at a fixed 8 mg/L level of sulbactam or at a level of fixed cefoperazone: sulbactam ratio (2:1) would constitute a combination form of cefoperazone/sulbactam, which has better activities against Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii than cefoperazone alone. Cefoperazone/sulbactam (1:1 or 1:2) has greater in-vitro activity against most multidrug-resistant organisms (ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii except for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa) than a 2:1 ratio. However, increased sulbactam concentration may induce AmpC production. Besides, sulbactam concentration might not be readily achievable in serum if the susceptibility rates were defined by the breakpoints of higher sulbactam composites, such as ≤16/16 (1:1) or 16/32 (1:2) mg/L. Carbapenemases (KPC-, OXA-type enzymes and metallo-β-lactamases) can't be inhibited by sulbactam. Some in-vitro studies showed that increasing sulbactam composites of cefoperazone/sulbactam had no effect on carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, suggesting the presence of carbapenemases or AmpC overproduction that could not be overcome by increasing sulbactam levels to recover cefoperazone activity. Sulbactam alone has good intrinsic activity against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter strains sometimes even in the presence of carbapenemase genes, suggesting unsteady levels of carbapenemases. In conclusion, appropriate composites of cefoperazone and β-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam may expand the clinical use if the pharmacokinetic optimization could be achieved in the human serum.

Update on the activity of delafloxacin against acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection isolates from European hospitals (2014-2019)

OBJECTIVES

Delafloxacin is a broad-spectrum anionic fluoroquinolone with activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Both oral and intravenous formulations were approved for use in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) due to Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms by the US Food and Drug Administration (2017) and European Medicines Agency (2019), and for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia by the FDA (2019). The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program has monitored the susceptibility of delafloxacin in the USA and Europe since 2014. The purpose of this study is to provide an update on delafloxacin activity against ABSSSI isolates primarily collected from hospitalised patients in Europe.

METHODS

A total of 11,866 non-duplicate ABSSSI isolates were collected from 2014 to 2019 from 46 European medical centres in 24 countries. Susceptibilities were determined by broth microdilution. Results were interpreted using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints (2020).

RESULTS

The most common isolate wasS. aureus (37.8%; n = 4484), followed by Escherichia coli (11.0%) and Streptococcus spp. (10.0%). Delafloxacin susceptibility for S. aureus was 92.4% (MIC_50/90, ≤0.004/0.25 mg/L), streptococci 98.4% and E. coli 58.1%. Delafloxacin was more active against S. aureus than levofloxacin (84.0% intermediate; MIC_50/90, 0.25/>4 mg/L) and moxifloxacin (84.3% susceptible; MIC_50/90, ≤0.06/2 mg/L). Susceptibility of E. coli was similar for the three quinolones.

CONCLUSIONS

Delafloxacin had broad-spectrum activity and improved potency against Gram-positive pathogens compared with levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. These data suggest that delafloxacin may be a useful therapeutic choice for the most common causes of ABSSSI.