Handling forces for the use of different inhaler devices

Quantifying Patient Capabilities and Setting the Stage for Future Development: Insights from a Sensor-Augmented Simulated Use Study with Pen Injectors

Background

While formative and summative usability testing is essential to confirm safe and effective product use, it may not be sufficient to comprehensively understand user capabilities and limitations in device interactions. Therefore, this research aims to quantify user handling forces for different device handling steps of pen injectors through sensor-augmented simulated use studies.

Research Design and methods

The study involved 46 participants who were divided into two groups: a healthy control group and a group of users with dexterity impairments. All participants were instructed to perform simulated handling steps using non-functional dummy devices equipped with force and torque sensors. Each handling step was performed twice: first at what participants considered a comfortable force level and then at their maximum force. The study then analyzed force data to investigate the impact of user characteristics and device geometry on force exertion during the different handling steps.

Results

The study demonstrates differences in the perceived comfortable and maximum force levels between the control and patient groups. These force levels decrease slightly with the user's age and level of dexterity impairment. Furthermore, the forces applied by the users are dependent on the geometry of the device and the holding pattern.

Conclusion

The results highlight the significance of sensor-augmented simulated use studies as a tool for providing quantitative insights into users' ability to exert force while handling self-injection devices. These data offer comprehensive insights that inform the definition of performance requirements and specifications for injection device design, thereby supporting the advancement of future self-injection devices.

An update on COPD prevention, diagnosis, and management: The 2024 GOLD Report

ABSTRACT

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the top three causes of death throughout the world. Because of the preventable and treatable nature of the disease along with its prevalence, COPD represents a major public health challenge. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Report provides a review of the most current evidence for prevention of COPD as well as the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of people with the disease. The purpose of this article is to provide a summary of the 2024 revised GOLD Report and current best practices in accordance with the evidence.

Consideration and Assessment of Patient Factors When Selecting an Inhaled Delivery System in COPD

Because guidelines and strategies for pharmacologic treatment of COPD focus on specific classes of inhaled medications, there is an unmet need for information to guide health care professionals for selecting an inhaled medication delivery system that matches the unique characteristics of individual patients. This article provides guidance for selecting an inhaled medication delivery system based on three "key" patient factors: cognitive function, manual dexterity/strength, and peak inspiratory flow. In addition, information is provided about specific tests to assess these patient factors. Cognitive impairment with an estimated prevalence of 25% among patients with COPD adversely affects patients' ability to correctly use a handheld device. To our knowledge, the prevalence of impaired manual dexterity/strength has not been reported in those with COPD. However, 79% of patients with COPD have reported one or more physical impediments that could influence their ability to manipulate an inhaler device. The measurement of peak inspiratory flow against the simulated resistance (PIFr) of a dry powder inhaler establishes whether the patient has the inhalation ability for creating optimal turbulent energy within the device. A suboptimal PIFr for low to medium-high resistance dry powder inhalers has been reported in 19% to 84% of stable outpatients with COPD. Health care professionals should consider cognitive function, manual dexterity/strength, and PIFr in their patients with COPD when prescribing inhaled pharmacotherapy. Impairments in these patient factors are common among those with COPD and can affect the individual's competency and effectiveness of using inhaled medications delivered by handheld devices.

Personalizing Selection of Inhaled Delivery Systems in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

It can be challenging for healthcare professionals (HCPs) to prescribe inhaled therapy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) because of the multiple individual and combinations of inhaled medications available in numerous delivery systems. Guidance on the selection of an inhaled delivery system has received limited attention compared with the emphasis on prescribing the class of the inhaled molecule(s). Although numerous recommendations and algorithms have been proposed to guide the selection of an inhaled delivery system for patients with COPD, no specific approach has been endorsed in COPD guidelines/strategies or by professional organizations. To provide recommendations for an inhaler selection strategy at initial and follow-up appointments, we examined the impact of patient errors using handheld inhalers on clinical outcomes and performed a focused narrative review to consider patient factors (continuity of the inhaled delivery system, cognitive function, manual function/dexterity, and peak inspiratory flow) when selecting an inhaled delivery system. On the basis of these findings, five questions are proposed for HCPs to consider in the initial selection of an inhaler delivery system and three questions to consider at follow-up. We propose that HCPs consider the inhaled medication delivery system as a unit and to match appropriate medication(s) with the unique features of the delivery system to individual patient factors. Assessment of inhaler technique and adherence together with patient outcomes/satisfaction at each visit is essential to determine whether the inhaled medication delivery system is providing benefits. Continued and repeated education on device features and correct technique is warranted to optimize efficacy.

Clinical outcomes of children using a metered dose inhaler with a sleeve attachment device to improve ease of use

Background

Activating pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) is often challenging for children. The Easy Squeezy (ES) is a novel sleeve attachment device that reduces activation force by 3 times. Although users have favored using the ES over using a pMDI alone, the clinical impact of the ES remains unknown. The aim of this study was to compare lung function and quality of life between ES users and users of a pMDI alone.

Objectives

Our aim was to measure and compare lung function of asthmatic children after they used the ES and pMDI alone.

Methods

In this crossover study we recruited 65 asthmatic children between the ages of 5 and 12 years. The participants were randomized into 2 groups. One of the groups used the ES for 6 weeks whereas the other group used a pMDI. After 6 weeks the participants crossed over to the other group. Lung function test parameters were measured after randomization and after each 6 weeks of device use. Quality of life (measured by the Patient Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [PAQLQ]) and Childhood Asthma Control Test were measured after each period of device use.

Results

There was no significant difference in the baseline lung function between the groups. The ES group had a significantly lower percentage difference between prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator FEV1 values. Although no significant differences were observed in PAQLQ scores between the groups, more patients in the ES group had improvement of their PAQLQ score than did patients in the group using a pMDI alone. Total Childhood Asthma Control Test scores were significantly higher for the ES group.

Conclusions

The ES device may allow users' asthma to be better controlled than by using a pMDI alone.

Understanding the feasibility and environmental effectiveness of a pilot postal inhaler recovery and recycling scheme

All inhalers have an environmental impact; the majority are not recycled, with many disposed of inappropriately through domestic waste. To assess the feasibility of a method for recovering and recycling inhalers, Chiesi Limited (Chiesi) set up and funded 'Take AIR (Action for Inhaler Recycling)', a 12-month pilot postal scheme facilitated by community pharmacies across Leicester, Leicestershire, and Rutland, and hospitals in Leicestershire. All inhalers were accepted in the scheme. The recovered pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) were dismantled and component parts recycled where possible; the remaining propellant gas was extracted for reuse in refrigeration and air conditioning industries. Other inhaler types were incinerated in an 'energy-from-waste' facility. From February 2021 to February 2022, 20,049 inhalers were returned; most (77%) were pMDIs. So far, Take AIR has saved the equivalent of an estimated 119.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions from entering the atmosphere. Our experience demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of a postal inhaler recovery and recycling scheme, which could be used as a foundation to build future initiatives.

Inhalation Devices in 7- to 15-Year-Old Children with Asthma - A Patient Preference Study

Background

Inhalation therapy is the cornerstone of treatment of bronchial asthma. A patient-specific selection of inhalation devices is necessary, as preference for a device plays an important role in terms of error rates in handling and adherence to therapy. However, there is no industry-independent study providing information on children's preferences for common inhaler types. The aim of the present study was to investigate the preference of asthmatic children for inhaler types commonly used in Germany. The effects of age, gender and the type of school visited on device preferences as well as the frequency of patient education and the role of health care providers in the choice for an inhaler were investigated.

Methods

Eighty children were included in this prospective cross-sectional study (age: 10.87 ± 2.62 years). The analysis was based on a questionnaire and validated checklists. All participants tested the use of nine placebo inhalers (Breezhaler, Diskus, Respimat, Spiromax, Turbohaler, Autohaler, metered-dose inhaler, Easyhaler and Novolizer) in a randomized order. For each device, patients were asked to assess handling, rate different device characteristics and name the device they would prefer most or least.

Results

The most favored device was the Novolizer. Moreover, the Spiromax scored highest in numerous categories such as suitability in emergencies and "easiest" device to use. Patient preferences with respect to the addressed inhaler features were not significantly related to age, gender or school type.

Conclusion

The Novolizer and the Spiromax showed higher preference in pediatric patients as compared to other tested devices. Overall, there were significant differences in terms of preference when comparing the tested inhalers in different aspects.

Relationship between Peak Inspiratory Flow and Patient and Disease Characteristics in Individuals with COPD—A Systematic Scoping Review

Optimal delivery of medication via dry powder inhalers, the most commonly prescribed inhaler type, is dependent on a patient achieving a minimum level of inspiratory flow during inhalation. However, measurement of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) against the simulated resistance of a dry powder inhaler is not frequently performed in clinical practice due to time or equipment limitations. Therefore, defining which patient characteristics are associated with lower PIF is critically important to help clinicians optimize their inhaler choice through a more personalized approach to prescribing. The objective of this scoping review was to systematically evaluate patient and disease characteristics determining PIF in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases were systematically searched for relevant studies on PIF in patients with COPD published in English between January 2000 and May 2021. The quality of evidence was assessed using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation checklist. Of 3382 citations retrieved, 35 publications were included in the review (nine scored as high quality, 13 as moderate, nine as low, and four as very low). Factors correlating with PIF in >70% of papers included both patient characteristics (lower PIF correlated with increased age, female gender, shorter height, decreased handgrip and inspiratory muscle strength, and certain comorbidities) and disease characteristics (lower PIF correlated with markers of lung hyperinflation, lower peak expiratory flow [PEF] and increased disease severity). Other factors correlating with adequate/optimal or improved PIF included education/counseling and exercise/inspiratory muscle training; impaired physical function and errors in inhalation technique/non-adherence were associated with low/suboptimal PIF. In conclusion, clinicians should measure PIF against the simulated resistance of a particular device wherever possible. However, as this often cannot be done due to lack of resources or time, the patient and disease characteristics that influence PIF, as identified in this review, can help clinicians to choose the most appropriate inhaler type for their patients.

Assessment of High-Power Electronic Nicotine Delivery System as an Alternative Aerosol Device for Terbutaline Delivery

PURPOSE

The performance of new-generation high-power electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) for the administration of inhaled terbutaline was assessed.

METHODS

The formulation of e-liquid was carried out using terbutaline in combination with 1, 3- propanediol. Several terbutaline concentrations (from 0.3125 to 2.500 mg / mL) and power levels (from 15 to 35 W) were assessed using a box type ENDS. The respirable drug dose was determined using a Glass Twin Impinger and quantified by liquid chromatography coupled with a UV-detector. The Next Generation Impactor and the Dekati Low Pressure Impactor were used to measure the aerosol particle size distribution in drug mass. The results were compared with a jet nebulizer (Cirrus TM 2) similar to the usual clinical conditions (2 mL at [terbutaline] of 2.5 mg / mL).

RESULTS

The optimal conditions to maximize terbutaline delivery using ENDS are a drug concentration at 1 mg/mL, and a power level at 30 W, to reach a respirable dose of 8.73 ± 0.90 µg/puff. By contrast, during a 5 min nebulization, the respirable dose of terbutaline was 1040 ± 33 µg whatever the cascade impactors and the aerosol devices used. The mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) remains similar for jet nebulizer and ENDS in the 1.74-2.07 µm range.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the jet nebulizer, a same respirable dose of terbutaline at the same range of aerosol size distribution was delivered by ENDS if 120 puffs were performed. The ENDS can be considered as an alternative aerosol device for terbutaline delivery.

A Systematic Review of Published Algorithms for Selecting an Inhaled Delivery System in COPD

RATIONALE

Medication for treatment of COPD is available in many different delivery systems; however, national and international guidelines do not provide recommendations on how to select the optimal system for an individual patient.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review of published algorithms for inhaler selection in out-patients with COPD.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were search for articles on inhaler selection published between January 1, 1990 and March 10, 2021. The results were reviewed for articles containing an algorithm for inhaler selection. The quality of publications containing an algorithm was assessed using the JBI SUMARI text and opinion critical appraisal checklist. Individual steps recommended in the algorithms and the order in which they were considered were extracted independently by the two authors using the JBI text and opinion data extraction tool. Textual syntheses and a table of factors included were used to appraise and compare algorithms.

RESULTS

The search identified 1016 publications. After removing duplicate studies (n = 409), 607 abstracts were examined. Nine different algorithms or hierarchical recommendations for device selection were identified. All nine publications were considered of good quality. Most algorithms contain only a few decision steps. There were significant differences between the algorithms. None of the algorithms have been validated. Three domains for factors included in the algorithms were identified: patient factors, device attributes, and HCP factors. Patient factors were considered most frequently (19 times) compared with device attributes (10 times) and HCP factors (7 times). Five specific attribute/factors with at least three rankings in different algorithms, were identified as key factors for device selection.

CONCLUSION

Although the algorithms generally provide step-by-step approaches based on a literature review and/or the experiences of the different authors, none were developed using item generation/reduction methodology nor included input from patients with COPD. There were considerable differences between the algorithms; however, the review identified key factors that should be considered by HCPs when selecting therapy. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021244475).

Matching the Inhaler to the Patient in COPD

Selecting the most appropriate inhalation device from the wide range available is essential for the successful management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although choice is good for healthcare professionals, knowing which inhaler to prescribe is a complex consideration. Among the key factors to consider are quality of disease control, inhaler technique, inhaler resistance and inspiratory flow, inhaler design and mechanisms of drug delivery, insurance and reimbursement restrictions, and environmental impact. In this article, we offer a simple, practical tool that brings together all these factors and includes hyperlinks to other published resources from the United Kingdom, Belgium, and The Netherlands.

Switching COPD patients from the disposable to the new reusable Respimat soft mist inhaler: a real-world study from Switzerland

OBJECTIVE

The aims of the survey were to assess first experiences of Swiss COPD patients switching from the disposable to the new reusable Respimat inhaler, and to evaluate physicians´ and patients´ views of the new training material.

METHODS

Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD using a disposable Respimat inhaler for at least three months were included. Patients´ demographics, COPD stage, current treatment, and comorbidities relevant for the handling of the device were assessed. Further, patients were trained on the reusable Respimat by placebo inhaler, patient brochure, video cards/demo films and SMS reminder service. After at least one cartridge change, patients gave comprehensive feedback on their satisfaction with the reusable Respimat and physicians evaluated the need for re-training.

RESULTS

235 patients participated in the survey. Of these, 37% suffered from comorbidities restricting the handling of the Respimat. 216 (92%) patients had a better overall satisfaction with the reusable than with the disposable Respimat. Dose counter (86%), monthly preparation (81%) and daily handling (77%) were also assessed as better by most of the patients. In 80% of cases, the user ability was stated as better than for the disposable Respimat. Less than 15% of the patients required further training. Placebo inhaler was the mostly preferred training material by both, physicians (in 86% of the patients) and patients (75%). In patients with comorbidities affecting inhaler handling, overall satisfaction was also better in 86% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients were satisfied with the new reusable Respimat device and proper handling could be attained using the provided training material, even in patients with restricting comorbidities.

Effect of a lever aid on hand strength required for using a handheld inhaler correctly

In the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, using a lever aid to improve drug delivery from an inhaler is recommended for patients with poor muscle strength. However, no studies have investigated the effect on hand strength of using a lever aid. Here, we measured hand strength before and after operating a lever aid and tried to predict the required strength. We compared the pinch force required to activate a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and a dry powder inhaler as well as the rotational torque required to activate a soft mist inhaler (SMI) before and after attaching a lever aid. We then assessed the correlation between the theoretical and measured pinch force after fitting the lever aid. Use of the lever aid significantly reduced the pinch force required for pMDI operation from 26.13-48.74 N to 4.90-16.87 N. In contrast, using a lever aid significantly reduced the force needed to rotate SMI, although the rotational torque required to operate did not change. There was a significant positive correlation between the theoretical and measured pinch forces required to activate a pMDI fitted with a lever aid. Using a lever aid will increase the number of patients who can use this device.