Implementation of neonatal screening for hearing impairment: influence on pediatric otitis media surgery in The Netherlands

Panel 8

Background and Objectives

Although serious complications of otitis media (OM) such as brain abscess are rare, sequelae of OM such as tympanic membrane perforation and atelectatic tympanic membrane are quite common. Inner ear sequelae can cause hearing loss and speech and language problems. The objectives of this article are to provide a state-of-the-art review on recent articles on complications and sequelae of OM in different anatomic locations, from the tympanic membrane to intracranial sites, as well as hearing loss and speech and language development.

Data Sources

Primarily PubMed supplemented by Ovid MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database.

Review Methods

All types of articles related to OM complications and sequelae published in English between January 2007 and June 2011 were identified. A total of 127 relevant quality articles are summarized and included in this report.

Results

Key findings are summarized based on the following major anatomic locations and categories: tympanic membrane; cholesteatoma; ossicular problems; mucosal sequelae; inner ear sequelae; speech and language development; extracranial areas, including mastoiditis and facial nerve paralysis; intracranial complications; and future research goals. New information and insights were gained to prevent complications and sequelae.

Conclusion and Implications for Practice

Over the past 4 years, progress has been made in advancing the knowledge on the complications and sequelae of OM, which can be used to prevent and treat them effectively. Areas of potential future research have been identified and outlined.

Screening for hearing loss versus parental concern regarding hearing problems: Subsequent referral and treatment for otitis media in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigates whether general practitioner (GP) consultation initiated by failing the population hearing screening at age nine months or GP consultation because of parental concern over ear/hearing problems was more important in deciding on referral and/or surgical treatment of otitis media (OM).

DESIGN

A questionnaire covering the history between birth and 21 months of age was used to obtain information on referral after failing the hearing screening, GP consultations for ear/hearing problems, and subsequent referral to a specialist and possible surgical treatment at an ENT department.

SETTING

The province of Limburg, the Netherlands.

SUBJECTS

Healthy infants invited for the hearing screening at age nine months, who responded in an earlier study called PEPPER (Persistent Ear Problems, Providing Evidence for Referral, response rate 58%).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The odds of a child being surgically treated for OM.

RESULTS

The response rate for the present questionnaire was 72%. Of all children tested, 3.9% failed the hearing screening and were referred to their GP. Of all 2619 children in this study, 18.6% visited their GP with ear/hearing problems. Children failing the hearing screening without GP consultation for ear/hearing problems were significantly more often treated surgically for OM than children passing the hearing screening but with GP consultation for ear/hearing problems.

CONCLUSION

Objectified hearing loss, i.e. failing the hearing screening, was important in the decision for surgical treatment in infants in the Netherlands.

Risk factors for failing the hearing screen due to otitis media in Dutch infants

Hearing loss from otitis media (OM) can affect young children's development. Some children with persistent OM-related hearing loss and associated problems can benefit from treatment, but researchers and clinicians are still unclear on how to identify them best. The present study aims to determine which factors are most related to the hearing loss in OM, as a first step towards an effective case-finding instrument for detecting infants with persistent OM-related hearing loss. The full PEPPER ('Persistent Ear Problems, Providing Evidence for Referral') item pool includes a wide range of risk factors for OM in a single questionnaire, and is easily completed by parents or guardians. The questionnaire was sent to all children invited for the universal hearing screen at age 9 months in Limburg, The Netherlands. Repeatedly failing of the hearing screen was used as outcome marker indicative of OM-related chronic hearing loss. Univariate analyses were conducted to determine statistically significant risk factors predicting 'fail' cases at this hearing screen. Five items were found as individually predictive of hearing screen failure and subsequent referral: 'having severe cold symptoms', 'attending day care with >4 children', 'having siblings', 'severe nasal congestion' and 'male gender'. Suitably worded parental questions document risk factors for OM-related hearing loss in infants, broadly consistent with past general literature on OM risk factors, but more focused. The findings justify further optimising and evaluation of an additive or multiplicative combination of these questions as a means for selecting and routing an infant with diagnosed or suspected OM to further care.

Selecting infants with OM that need referral and further assessment: creating a case-finding instrument

OBJECTIVE

In the Netherlands, many children are surgically treated for OM. Recent publications question the need for surgical treatment in common uncomplicated OM, although there is certainly a subgroup of infants that do need further assessment and possible treatment. The present study explores the possibility of using known and presumed risk factors for OM as an instrument for selecting and routing an infant with OM to further care.

METHODS

Two questionnaires were used. A questionnaire embracing a wide range of OM-related factors was sent to 6531 children aged nine months that were routinely invited for the hearing screen at nine months. In a second stage, a structured history questionnaire regarding ear and/or hearing problems, subsequent referral and/or treatment, was sent to all parents of children at age 21 months, responding to the first questionnaire. Univariate analysis was performed for identification of potential predictors for surgical treatment of OM for the whole sample as well as for 4 different subsets. Multivariable regression analysis with stepwise backward deletion was applied to arrive at a model for optimal prediction of tube insertion. A ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve and the accompanying sensitivity and specificity values were analyzed to determine cut off values.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis found 10 items predicting surgical treatment for OM. Multivariable regression analysis resulted in a model with a ROC curve having an area of 0.801 and estimated coefficients for risk factors which were used to calculate a OM-score for each case.

CONCLUSION

The developed scoring sheet, e.g., to be used in combination with physical examinations and/or tympanometry looks promising as a predictor for those children that might benefit from further assessment and eventually surgically treatment for OM.