1
|
Alsaihaty Z, Abdul Manan H, Sabarudin A, Yahya N. Hybrid Treatment Planning for Chest Wall Irradiation Utilizing Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT), Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT): A Systematic Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e59583. [PMID: 38832195 PMCID: PMC11144584 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Novel hybrid approaches for chest wall irradiation show promising outcomes regarding target coverage and sparing organs at risk (OARs). In this systematic review, we compared hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT) or hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (H-IMRT) techniques with non-hybrid techniques, such as three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), field-in-field (FIF), intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), for breast cancer patients with mastectomy. Our focus was the plan quality and dose distribution to the OARs. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist, we performed a systematic review and quality appraisal of primary studies evaluating hybrid therapy to the chest wall and the OARs. An extensive online search of PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted using appropriate keywords. The dose to the OARs (lung, heart, and contralateral breast), planning target volume (PTV), homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI) were extracted. The data were then tabulated and compared for the outcomes between modalities among the studies. Nine studies that met the search criteria were selected to evaluate the PTV coverage and dosimetric results of hybrid and non-hybrid techniques. In terms of 95% PTV coverage, among nine reviewed studies, the largest difference between the two techniques was between VMAT (47.6 Gy) and H-VMAT (48.4 Gy); for the conformity index, the largest difference was noted between 3DCRT (0.58) and H-VMAT (0.79). In both cases, differences were statistically significant (P < 0.005). Two studies showed dose homogeneity improvement within the treatment target in H-VMAT (0.15 and 0.07) compared with 3DCRT (0.41 and 0.12), with a P value of <0.001. Two studies did not report on the homogeneity index, and three others observed no statistical difference. Regarding OARs, in the comparison of H-VMAT and VMAT, the largest significant change was in the volume receiving 5 Gy (V5Gy) of the ipsilateral lung and the V10Gy of the contralateral lung. For the ipsilateral lung, V5Gy was 90.7% with VMAT versus 51.45% with H-VMAT. For the contralateral lung, V10Gy was 54.9% with VMAT versus 50.5% with H-VMAT. In six studies, the mean dose of the contralateral breast was lower in hybrid techniques than in single modalities: VMAT (4.2%, 6.0%, 1.9%, 7.1%, 4.57%) versus H-VMAT (1.4%, 3.4%, 1.8%, 3.5%, 2.34%) and IMRT (9.1%) versus H-IMRT (4.69%). Although most studies did not report on monitor units and treatment time, those that included them showed that hybrids had lower monitor units and shorter treatment times. Hybrid techniques in radiotherapy, such as combining two modalities, can indeed facilitate lower doses to OARs for patients with a high risk of toxicities. Prospective clinical studies are needed to determine the outcomes of breast cancer treated with hybrid techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zainab Alsaihaty
- Radiation Therapy, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, SAU
- Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Centre for Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Investigative Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| | - Hanani Abdul Manan
- Functional Image Processing Laboratory, Department of Radiology, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| | - Akmal Sabarudin
- Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Centre for Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Investigative Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| | - Noorazrul Yahya
- Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Centre for Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Investigative Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen K, Sun W, Han T, Yan L, Sun M, Xia W, Wang L, Shi Y, Ge C, Yang X, Li Y, Wang H. Robustness of hypofractionated breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery with free breathing. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1259851. [PMID: 38023210 PMCID: PMC10644368 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1259851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the robustness with respect to the positional variations of five planning strategies in free-breathing breast hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) for patients after breast-conserving surgery. Methods Twenty patients who received breast HFRT with 42.72 Gy in 16 fractions were retrospectively analyzed. Five treatment planning strategies were utilized for each patient, including 1) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning (IMRTpure); 2) IMRT planning with skin flash tool extending and filling the fluence outside the skin by 2 cm (IMRTflash); 3) IMRT planning with planning target volume (PTV) extended outside the skin by 2 cm in the computed tomography dataset (IMRTePTV); 4) hybrid planning, i.e., 2 Gy/fraction three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy combined with 0.67 Gy/fraction IMRT (IMRThybrid); and 5) hybrid planning with skin flash (IMRThybrid-flash). All plans were normalized to 95% PTV receiving 100% of the prescription dose. Six additional plans were created with different isocenter shifts for each plan, which were 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm, 7 mm, and 10 mm distally in the X (left-right) and Y (anterior-posterior) directions, namely, (X,Y), to assess their robustness, and the corresponding doses were recalculated. Variation of dosimetric parameters with increasing isocenter shift was evaluated. Results All plans were clinically acceptable. In terms of robustness to isocenter shifts, the five planning strategies followed the pattern IMRTePTV, IMRThybrid-flash, IMRTflash, IMRThybrid, and IMRTpure in descending order. V 95% of IMRTePTV maintained at 99.6% ± 0.3% with a (5,5) shift, which further reduced to 98.2% ± 2.0% with a (10,10) shift. IMRThybrid-flash yielded the robustness second to IMRTePTV with less risk from dose hotspots, and the corresponding V 95% maintained >95% up until (5,5). Conclusion Considering the dosimetric distribution and robustness in breast radiotherapy, IMRTePTV performed best at maintaining high target coverage with increasing isocenter shift, while IMRThybrid-flash would be adequate with positional uncertainty<5 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunzhi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Wuji Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Tao Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Lei Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Minghui Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Wenming Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Libo Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yinghua Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Chao Ge
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Xu Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yu Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Huidong Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, Department of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Racka I, Majewska K, Winiecki J, Kiluk K. Hybrid planning techniques for early-stage left-sided breast cancer: dose distribution analysis and estimation of projected secondary cancer-relative risk. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:932-941. [PMID: 37516978 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2238553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate three techniques of irradiation of left-sided breast cancer patients, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), hybrid Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (h-IMRT), and hybrid Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (h-VMAT, h-ARC), in terms of dose distribution in the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). The second aim was to estimate the projected relative risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers for hybrid techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three treatment plans were prepared in 3D-CRT, h-IMRT, and h-VMAT techniques for each of the 40 patients, who underwent CT simulation in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). For hybrid techniques, plans were created by combining 3D-CRT and dynamic fields with an 80%/20% dose ratio for 3D-CRT and IMRT or VMAT. Cumulative dose-volume histograms were used to compare dose distributions within the PTV and OARs (heart, left anterior descending coronary artery [LAD], left and right lung [LL, RL], right breast [RB]). Projected risk ratios for secondary cancers were estimated relative to 3D-CRT using the organ equivalent dose (OED) concept for the Schneider's linear exponential, plateau, and full mechanistic dose-response model. RESULTS All plans fulfilled the PTV criterium: V95%≥95%. Compared to 3D-CRT, both hybrid techniques showed significantly better target coverage (PTV: V95%>98%, p < 0.001), and the best conformality was achieved by h-ARC plans (CI: 1.18 ± 0.09, p < 0.001). Compared to 3D-CRT and h-ARC, h-IMRT increased the average sum of monitor units (MU) over 129.9% (p < 0.001). H-ARC increased the mean dose of contralateral organs and the LL V5Gy parameter (p < 0.001). Both hybrid techniques significantly reduced the Dmax of the heart by 5 Gy. Compared to h-IMRT, h-ARC increased secondary cancer projected relative risk ratios for LL, RL, and RB by 18, 152, and 81%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The results confirmed that both hybrid techniques provide better target quality and OARs sparing than 3D-CRT. Hybrid VMAT delivers less MU compared to hybrid IMRT but may increase the risk of radiation-induced secondary malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iga Racka
- Medical Physics Department, Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Oncology Center, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Karolina Majewska
- Medical Physics Department, Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Oncology Center, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Janusz Winiecki
- Medical Physics Department, Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Oncology Center, Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Clinic of Oncology and Brachytherapy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicholas Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aalhate M, Mahajan S, Singh H, Guru SK, Singh PK. Nanomedicine in therapeutic warfront against estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2023; 13:1621-1653. [PMID: 36795198 DOI: 10.1007/s13346-023-01299-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in women worldwide. Almost 70-80% of cases of BC are curable at the early non-metastatic stage. BC is a heterogeneous disease with different molecular subtypes. Around 70% of breast tumors exhibit estrogen-receptor (ER) expression and endocrine therapy is used for the treatment of these patients. However, there are high chances of recurrence in the endocrine therapy regimen. Though chemotherapy and radiation therapy have substantially improved survival rates and treatment outcomes in BC patients, there is an increased possibility of the development of resistance and dose-limiting toxicities. Conventional treatment approaches often suffer from low bioavailability, adverse effects due to the non-specific action of chemotherapeutics, and low antitumor efficacy. Nanomedicine has emerged as a conspicuous strategy for delivering anticancer therapeutics in BC management. It has revolutionized the area of cancer therapy by increasing the bioavailability of the therapeutics and improving their anticancer efficacy with reduced toxicities on healthy tissues. In this article, we have highlighted various mechanisms and pathways involved in the progression of ER-positive BC. Further, different nanocarriers delivering drugs, genes, and natural therapeutic agents for surmounting BC are the spotlights of this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayur Aalhate
- Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Hyderabad, Telangana, 500037, India
| | - Srushti Mahajan
- Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Hyderabad, Telangana, 500037, India
| | - Hoshiyar Singh
- Department of Biological Science, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Hyderabad, 500037, India
| | - Santosh Kumar Guru
- Department of Biological Science, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Hyderabad, 500037, India
| | - Pankaj Kumar Singh
- Department of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Hyderabad, Telangana, 500037, India.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang Q, Zeng Y, Peng Y, Yu H, Zhang S, Wu S. Critical Evaluation of Secondary Cancer Risk After Breast Radiation Therapy with Hybrid Radiotherapy Techniques. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2023; 15:25-38. [PMID: 36714379 PMCID: PMC9882622 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s383369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Background As hybrid radiotherapy technique can effectively balance dose distribution between targets and organs, it is necessary to evaluate the late effects related to radiotherapy. The aim of the study was to calculate and provide individual estimates of the risks for hybrid radiotherapy techniques in breast cancer patients. Methods Whole-breast irradiation was performed in 43 breast cancer patients by using 3D conformal, intensity-modulated and hybrid techniques. The excess absolute risk (EAR), lifetime attributable risk (LAR) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were calculated to estimate risks in organs. The risk variability in contralateral breast was assessed by using the patient's anatomic parameters. Results Compared with IMRT and FinF, hybrid techniques achieved satisfactory dose distribution and comparable or lower estimated risks in organs. The LAR was estimated to be up to 0.549% for contralateral lung with advantages of tangential techniques over H-VMAT. For ipsilateral lung, the LAR was estimated to be up to 9.021%, but lower in H-VMAT and FinF without significant difference. The risk of thyroid was negligible in overall estimation. For contralateral breast, the LAR was estimated to be up to 0.865% with advantages of MH-IMRT and H-VMAT over TF-IMRT. The fraction of individual variability could be explained by using anatomic parameters of minimum breast distance (MBD) and minimum target concave angle (θMTCA). NTCP for all analyzed endpoints was significantly higher in TF-IMRT relative to FinF and hybrid techniques, while TH-IMRT and H-VMAT were presenting lower toxicity risk. However, MH-IMRT presented a higher probability of toxicity in lung. For most cases, H-VMAT demonstrated a benefit for contralateral breast, heart and lung sparing. Conclusion The optimal treatment should be performed individually according to anatomic parameters and balances between EAR and NTCP. Individual assessment may assist in achieving optimal balances between targets and organs as well as supporting clinical decision-making processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quanbin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yu Zeng
- Department of Stomatology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yingying Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hui Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shuxu Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Correspondence: Shuxu Zhang; Shuyu Wu, Email ;
| | - Shuyu Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China,Correspondence: Shuxu Zhang; Shuyu Wu, Email ;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gnerucci A, Esposito M, Ghirelli A, Pini S, Paoletti L, Barca R, Fondelli S, Alpi P, Grilli B, Rossi F, Scoccianti S, Russo S. Surface-guided DIBH radiotherapy for left breast cancer: impact of different thresholds on intrafractional motion monitoring and DIBH stability. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:55-66. [PMID: 36229656 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-02008-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare two left breast cancer patient cohorts (tangential vs. locoregional deep-inspiration breath-hold - DIBH treatment) with different predefined beam gating thresholds and to evaluate their impact on motion management and DIBH stability. METHODS An SGRT-based clinical workflow was adopted for the DIBH treatment. Intrafractional monitoring was performed by tracking both the respiratory signal and the real-time displacement between the isocenter on the daily reference surface and on the live surface ("SGRT shift"). Beam gating tolerances were 5 mm/4 mm for the SGRT shifts and 5 mm/3 mm for the gating window amplitude for breast tangential and breast + lymph nodes locoregional treatments, respectively. A total of 24 patients, 12 treated with a tangential technique and 12 with a locoregional technique, were evaluated for a total number of 684 fractions. Statistical distributions of SGRT shift and respiratory signal for each treatment fraction, for each patient treatment, and for the two population samples were generated. RESULTS Lateral cumulative distributions of SGRT shifts for both locoregional and tangential samples were consistent with a null shift, whereas longitudinal and vertical ones were slightly negative (mean values < 1 mm). The distribution of the percentage of beam on time with SGRT shift > 3 mm, > 4 mm, or > 5 mm was extended toward higher values for the tangential sample than for the locoregional sample. The variability in the DIBH respiration signal was significantly greater for the tangential sample. CONCLUSION Different beam gating thresholds for surface-guided DIBH treatment of left breast cancer can impact motion management and DIBH stability by reducing the frequency of the maximum SGRT shift and increasing respiration signal stability when tighter thresholds are adopted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gnerucci
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | - M Esposito
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - A Ghirelli
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - S Pini
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - L Paoletti
- Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - R Barca
- Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - S Fondelli
- Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - P Alpi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - B Grilli
- Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - F Rossi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Grosseto, Italy
| | - S Scoccianti
- Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - S Russo
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Karaca S. The use of Hybrid Techniques in Whole-Breast Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2022; 21:15330338221143937. [PMID: 36537067 PMCID: PMC9772967 DOI: 10.1177/15330338221143937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The development of new techniques in radiotherapy (RT) provides a better planned target volume (PTV) dose distribution while further improving the protection of organs at risk (OARs). The study aims to present the dosimetric results of studies using hybrid techniques in whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT). Methods: This systematic literature review was conducted by scanning the relevant literature in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Among the parameters are dose values for PTV and OARs beam contribute ratios, the value of monitors, and treatment times for different RT techniques. Initially, 586 articles were identified; 196 duplicate articles were removed leaving 391 articles for screening. Three-hundred and thirty-seven irrelevant articles were excluded, leaving 54 studies assessed for eligibility. A total of 22 articles met the search criteria to evaluate dosimetric results of hybrid and other RT techniques in WBRT. Results: According to the dosimetric data of the studies, hybrid intensity-modulated RT (H-IMRT) and hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT) techniques give dosimetrically advantageous results in WBRT compared to other RT techniques. Conclusion: Hybrid techniques using appropriate beams contribute value and show great promise in improving dosimetric results in WBRT. However, there is a need for new studies showing the long-term clinical results of hybrid RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sibel Karaca
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey,Sibel Karaca, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Akdeniz University, Antalya, 07070, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Prasad Srivastava R, Jha B, Prasad Lamichhane H, Prasiko G. Modern Radiotherapy Techniques for Breast Cancer Treatment. Radiat Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.101700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
There are many radiotherapy techniques used to treat breast cancer. Each techniques have their own limitations. The treatment techniques are valid depending on the facilities available to the department. The patient could be treated any technique as the expert knowledge to the center. This chapter will explain about the techniques used in current practice of breast cancer treatment. It will be explained why one technique procedure is better than others. The dose prescription and protocol will be not discussed. It depends on the department policy and facilities. The chapter will be the practical purpose that readers can use straight.
Collapse
|
9
|
Miura H, Doi Y, Nakao M, Ozawa S, Kenjo M, Nagata Y. Improved treatment robustness of postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy including supraclavicular nodes. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 23:153-156. [PMID: 36035090 PMCID: PMC9405093 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
A combination of a three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) plan with a dose gradient of the chest wall area and a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan of the supraclavicular area might improve the dose distribution robustness in the junction. To investigate the impact of patient motion on the dose distribution, hybrid 3D-CRT and VMAT plans were recalculated by shifting the isocenter of the VMAT plan. Compared to the nominal plan, the target D98% for high- vs low-dose gradients decreased by 24% vs 12%. Hybrid VMAT with a low-dose gradient 3D-CRT plan was found to be robust towards patient motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideharu Miura
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku Hiroshima 732-0057, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
- Corresponding author.
| | - Yoshiko Doi
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku Hiroshima 732-0057, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
| | - Minoru Nakao
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku Hiroshima 732-0057, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
| | - Shuichi Ozawa
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku Hiroshima 732-0057, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
| | - Masahiro Kenjo
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku Hiroshima 732-0057, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
| | - Yasushi Nagata
- Hiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, 3-2-2, Futabanosato, Higashi-ku Hiroshima 732-0057, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami-ku Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
A semi-automatic planning technique for whole breast irradiation with tangential IMRT fields. Phys Med 2022; 98:122-130. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
11
|
Tsai YC, Wang CC, Wang CW, Liang HK, Wang SF, Wu CJ, Lin CS. Efficient method for whole-breast irradiation therapy using Halcyon linear accelerators. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13635. [PMID: 35587264 PMCID: PMC9278690 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Halcyon is a linear accelerator‐based treatment machine designed for a high‐throughput simplified workflow. The machine features a compact jawless design, dual‐layer multileaf collimators, and a single 6‐MV flattening filter‐free (FFF) beam. However, the machine's 6‐MV FFF beam may restrict its applicability to conventional techniques, such as field‐in‐field (FiF) radiotherapy, for breast cancer treatment. This study developed a practical and efficient hybrid method for imaging, planning, and irradiation procedures for whole‐breast irradiation using Halcyon linear accelerators. Materials and methods The proposed method involves five major steps: (1) field arrangement, (2) planning target volume (PTV) generation and evaluation, (3) basal plan generation, (4) inverse planning intensity–modulated radiation therapy plan generation, and (5) plan evaluation and irradiation. The PTV is generated using isodose curves plotted on the basis of tangential fields, which are applied to create a basal plan. Subsequently, a basal‐dose‐compensation approach is applied to further optimize the treatment plan. This efficient workflow necessitates executing only one onboard cone‐beam computed tomography procedure. This study included 10 patients with early‐stage breast cancer who were treated at our center. The performance of the proposed method was evaluated by comparing its corresponding irradiation time and dose statistics with those derived for a dynamically flattened beam‐based FiF (DFB‐FiF) method. Results All plans were normalized to ensure that 98% of the prescribed dose covered 95% of the PTV. On average, the global maximum doses in the proposed and DFB‐FiF methods were lower than 106%. The homogeneity index for right‐sided (left‐sided) breast cancer was 0.053 (0.056) in the proposed method and 0.073 (0.076) in the DFB‐FiF method. The dose statistics of normal tissues, including the contralateral breast, heart, and lungs, were comparable between the methods. However, the irradiation time per monitor unit in the proposed method was approximately five times faster than that in the DFB‐FiF method, but the planning time and complexity were similar between the methods. Conclusions This study developed and evaluated an efficient and practical hybrid method for whole‐breast irradiation using the Halcyon. This method can significantly reduce the irradiation time, while providing comparable dose statistics to the DFB‐FiF method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chun Tsai
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Wei Wang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Kung Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Fan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Jung Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chang-Shiun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Evaluation of image-guided and surface-guided radiotherapy for breast cancer patients treated in deep inspiration breath-hold: A single institution experience. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2022; 21:51-57. [PMID: 35243045 PMCID: PMC8861395 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nowadays, deep inspiratory breath-hold is a common technique to reduce heart dose in left-sided breast radiotherapy. This study evaluates the evolution of the breath-hold technique in our institute, from portal imaging during dose delivery to continuous monitoring with surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Setup data and portal imaging results were analyzed for 98 patients treated before 2014, and SGRT data for 228 patients treated between 2018 and 2020. For the pre-SGRT group, systematic and random setup errors were calculated for different correction protocols. Residual errors and reproducibility of breath-holds were evaluated for both groups. The benefit of using SGRT for initial positioning was evaluated for another cohort of 47 patients. RESULTS Online correction reduced the population mean error from 3.9 mm (no corrections) to 1.4 mm. Despite online setup correction, deviations greater than 3 mm were observed in about 10% and 20% of the treatment beams in ventral-dorsal and cranial-caudal directions, respectively. However, these percentages were much smaller than with offline protocols or no corrections. Mean absolute differences between breath-holds within a fraction were smaller in the SGRT-group (1.69 mm) than in the pre-SGRT-group (2.10 mm), and further improved with addition of visual feedback (1.30 mm). SGRT for positioning did not improve setup accuracy, but slightly reduced the time for imaging and setup correction, allowing completion within 3.5 min for 95% of fractions. CONCLUSION For accurate radiotherapy breast treatments using deep inspiration breath-hold, daily imaging and correction is required. SGRT provides accurate information on patient positioning during treatment and improves patient compliance with visual feedback.
Collapse
Key Words
- (U, V), ventral-dorsal and cranial-caudal direction in the tangential beam, respectively
- Breast
- Breath-hold
- CBCT, cone-beam CT
- CT, computer tomography
- DIBH
- DIBH, Deep inspiratory breath-hold
- DRRs, digitally reconstructed radiographs
- LAT, medio-lateral direction
- LNG, cranial-caudal direction
- NAL, no-action-level setup correction protocol
- OTM, online treatment monitor
- SGRT, surface-guided radiotherapy
- Surface-guided radiotherapy
- VRT, anterior-posterior direction
- eNAL, extended NAL setup correction protocol
Collapse
|
13
|
Manikandan PS, Sathiyaraj P, Varatharaj C, Ganesh KM, Sathiyan S, Ravikumar M. Dosimetric evaluation of hybrid and volumetric-modulated arc therapy plan for left-sided chest wall irradiation in MONACO treatment planning system. J Cancer Res Ther 2022; 18:1728-1732. [DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_707_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
14
|
Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy for chest wall and nodal irradiation using hybrid techniques. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396921000601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim:
This study compares three different hybrid plans, for left-sided chest wall (CW) and nodal stations irradiation using a hypofractionated dose regimen.
Materials and methods:
Planning target volumes (PTVs) of 25 breast cancer patients that included CW, supraclavicular (SCL) and internal mammary node (IMN) were planned with 3 different hybrid techniques: 3DCRT+IMRT, 3DCRT+VMAT and IMRT+VMAT. All hybrid plans were generated with a hypofractionated dose prescription of 40·5 Gy in 15 fractions. Seventy per cent of the dose was planned with the base-dose component and remaining 30% of the dose was planned with the hybrid component. All plans were evaluated based on the PTVs and organs at risk (OARs) dosimetric parameters.
Results:
The results for PTVs parameters have shown that the 3DCRT+IMRT and 3DCRT+VMAT plans were superior in uniformity index to the IMRT+VMAT plan. The OARs dose parameters were comparable between hybrid plans. The IMRT+VMAT plan provided a larger low dose volume spread to the heart and ipsilateral lung (p < 0·001). The 3DCRT+VMAT plan required less monitor units and treatment time (p = 0·005) than other plans.
Conclusion:
The 3DCRT+VMAT hybrid plan showed superior results with efficient treatment delivery and provide clinical benefit by reducing both low and high dose levels.
Collapse
|
15
|
Comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for left-sided whole-breast irradiation using automated planning. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 198:236-246. [PMID: 34351452 PMCID: PMC8863712 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01817-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Published treatment technique comparisons for postoperative left-sided whole breast irradiation (WBI) with deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) are scarce, small, and inconclusive. In this study, fully automated multi-criterial plan optimization, generating a single high-quality, Pareto-optimal plan per patient and treatment technique, was used to compare for a large patient cohort 1) intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with two tangential fields and 2) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with two small tangential subarcs. Materials and methods Forty-eight randomly selected patients recently treated with DIBH and 16 × 2.66 Gy were included. The optimizer was configured for the clinical planning protocol. Comparisons between IMRT and VMAT included dosimetric plan parameters, estimated excess relative risks (ERR) for toxicities, delivery times, MUs, and deliverability accuracy at a linac. Results The automatically generated IMRT and VMAT plans applied in this study were similar or higher in quality than the manually generated clinical plans. For equal PTVin V95% (98.4 ± 0.9%), VMAT had significant advantages compared to IMRT regarding breast dose homogeneity and doses in heart and ipsilateral lung, at the cost of some minor deteriorations for contralateral breast (few cases with larger deteriorations) and lung. Conformality improved from 1.38 to 1.18 (p < 0.001). With VMAT, ERR for major coronary events and ipsilateral lung tumors were reduced by 3% (range: −1–12%) and 16% (range: −3–38%), respectively. MUs and delivery times were higher for VMAT. There were no statistical differences in γ passing rates. Conclusion For WBI in conservative therapy of left-sided breast patients treated with DIBH, VMAT with two tangential subarcs was generally dosimetrically superior to IMRT with two tangential static fields. Results need confirmation by robustness analyses.
Collapse
|
16
|
Cunningham L, Penfold S, Giles E, Le H, Short M. Impact of Breast Size on Dosimetric Indices in Proton Versus X-ray Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11040282. [PMID: 33917818 PMCID: PMC8068250 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11040282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) radiotherapy is a technique used to manage early stage left-sided breast cancer. This study compared dosimetric indices of patient-specific X-ray versus proton therapy DIBH plans to explore differences in target coverage, radiation doses to organs at risk, and the impact of breast size. Radiotherapy plans of sixteen breast cancer patients previously treated with DIBH radiotherapy were re-planned with hybrid inverse-planned intensity modulated X-ray radiotherapy (h-IMRT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). The total prescribed dose was 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions for all cases. Comparisons between the clinical, h-IMRT, and IMPT evaluated doses to target volumes, organs at risk, and correlations between doses and breast size. Although no differences were observed in target volume coverage between techniques, the h-IMRT and IMPT were able to produce more even dose distributions and IMPT delivered significantly less dose to all organs at risk than both X-ray techniques. A moderate negative correlation was observed between breast size and dose to the target in X-ray techniques, but not IMPT. Both h-IMRT and IMPT produced plans with more homogeneous dose distribution than forward-planned IMRT and IMPT achieved significantly lower doses to organs at risk compared to X-ray techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Cunningham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide 5000, Australia; (L.C.); (S.P.); (H.L.)
| | - Scott Penfold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide 5000, Australia; (L.C.); (S.P.); (H.L.)
| | - Eileen Giles
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia;
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide 5000, Australia; (L.C.); (S.P.); (H.L.)
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia;
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-8-83022089
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Venjakob A, Oertel M, Hering DA, Moustakis C, Haverkamp U, Eich HT. Hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy for hypofractionated radiotherapy of breast cancer: a treatment planning study. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:296-307. [PMID: 33068126 PMCID: PMC7987622 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01696-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate the best possible practice using hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT) for hypofractionated radiation therapy of breast cancer. Different combinations of H‑VMAT-a combination of three-dimensional radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and VMAT-were analyzed regarding planning target volume (PTV), dose coverage, and exposure to organs at risk (OAR). METHODS Planning computed tomography scans were acquired in deep-inspiration breath-hold. A total of 520 treatment plans were calculated and evaluated for 40 patients, comprising six different H‑VMAT plans and a 3D-CRT plan as reference. H‑VMAT plans consisted of two treatment plans including 3D-CRT and VMAT. During H‑VMAT planning, the use of hard wedge filters (HWF) and beam energies were varied. The reference plans were planned with mixed beam energies and the inclusion/omission of HWF. RESULTS Compared to the reference treatment plans, all H‑VMAT plans showed consistently better PTV dose coverage, conformity, and homogeneity. Additionally, OAR protection was significantly improved with several H‑VMAT combinations (p < 0.05). The comparison of different H‑VMAT combinations showed that inclusion of HWF in the base plan had a negative impact on PTV dose coverage, conformity, and OAR exposure. It also increased the planned monitor units and beam-on time. Advantages of using lower beam energies (6-MV photons) in both the base plan and in the VMAT supplementary dose were observed. CONCLUSION The H‑VMAT technique is an effective possibility for generating homogenous and conformal dose distributions. With the right choice of H‑VMAT combination, superior OAR protection is achieved compared to 3D-CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Venjakob
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Building A1, 1 Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Michael Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Building A1, 1 Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Dominik Alexander Hering
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Building A1, 1 Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Christos Moustakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Building A1, 1 Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Uwe Haverkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Building A1, 1 Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Building A1, 1 Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Xie Y, Guo B, Zhang R. Cost-effectiveness analysis of radiotherapy techniques for whole breast irradiation. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0248220. [PMID: 33684139 PMCID: PMC7939353 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The current standard of care (SOC) for whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) in the US is conventional tangential photon fields. Advanced WBRT techniques may provide similar tumor control and better normal tissue sparing, but it is controversial whether the medical benefits of an advanced technology are significant enough to justify its higher cost. Objective To analyze the cost-effectiveness of six advanced WBRT techniques compared with SOC. Methods We developed a Markov model to simulate health states for one cohort of women (65-year-old) with early-stage breast cancer over 15 years after WBRT. The cost effectiveness analyses of field-in-field (FIF), hybrid intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), full IMRT, standard volumetric modulated arc therapy (STD-VMAT), multiple arc VMAT (MA-VMAT), non-coplanar VMAT (NC-VMAT) compared with SOC were performed with both tumor control and radiogenic side effects considered. Transition probabilities and utilities for each health state were obtained from literature. Costs incurred by payers were adopted from literature and Medicare data. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to evaluate the impact of uncertainties on the final results. Results FIF has the lowest ICER value of 1,511 $/QALY. The one-way analyses show that the cost-effectiveness of advanced WBRT techniques is most sensitive to the probability of developing contralateral breast cancer. PSAs show that SOC is more cost effective than almost all advanced WBRT techniques at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 50,000 $/QALY, while FIF, hybrid IMRT and MA-VMAT are more cost-effective than SOC with a probability of 59.2%, 72.3% and 72.6% at a WTP threshold of 100,000 $/QALY, respectively. Conclusions FIF might be the most cost-effective option for WBRT patients at a WTP threshold of 50,000 $/QALY, while hybrid IMRT and MA-VMAT might be the most cost-effective options at a WTP threshold of 100,000 $/QALY.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yibo Xie
- Medical Physics Program, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America
| | - Beibei Guo
- Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America
| | - Rui Zhang
- Medical Physics Program, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee DS, Lee YK, Kang YN, Won YG, Park SH, Kim YS, Kim JS, Won HS. Assessment of planning reproducibility in three-dimensional field-in-field radiotherapy technique for breast cancer: impact of surgery-simulation interval. Sci Rep 2021; 11:1556. [PMID: 33452292 PMCID: PMC7810888 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78666-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The three-dimensional field-in-field (3-D FIF) technique for radiotherapy is an advanced, state-of-the-art method that uses multileaf collimators to generate a homogeneous and conformal dose distribution via segmental subfields. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dosimetric reproducibility of 3-D FIF plans using the original simulation computed tomography (iCT) scans and re-simulation CT (rCT) scans for whole breast irradiation (WBI) schedule. This study enrolled a total of 34 patients. The study population underwent iCT scans for standard WBI and took rCT scans after 45 Gy of WBI for cone down boost plans. The dosimetric parameters (V105%, V103%, V100%, V98%, V95%, V90%, V50%), plan quality indices (conformity index, homogeneity index) and clinical parameters (isocenter-breast axis, isocenter-lung axis, soft tissue volumes within radiation field, lung volumes within radiation field) were assessed. The median time interval from surgery to iCT was 33 days and from iCT to rCT was 35 days. All dosimetric parameters exhibited statistically significant differences between iCT and rCT among cohorts with a surgery-iCT interval of < 60 days. Homogeneity index showed a statistically significant increase from iCT to rCT among all cohorts. Soft tissue volumes (p = 0.001) and isocenter-breast axis (p = 0.032) exhibited statistically significant differences among cohorts with surgery-iCT interval < 60 days. Regarding the reproducibility of the 3-D FIF WBI plans, significant changes were observed in dosimetric and clinical factors, particularly in study cohorts with a surgery-simulation interval < 60 days. The main contributing factor of these transitions seemed to be the changes in volume of the soft tissue within the WBI field. Further confirmative studies are necessary to determine the most suitable timing and technique for WBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Soo Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Young Kyu Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Proton Therapy Center, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Nam Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Gyun Won
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,AbbVie Biopharmaceutical Company, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hwan Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Seok Kim
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye Sung Won
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen SN, Ramachandran P, Deb P. Dosimetric comparative study of 3DCRT, IMRT, VMAT, Ecomp, and Hybrid techniques for breast radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol J 2021; 38:270-281. [PMID: 33389982 PMCID: PMC7785843 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2020.00619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess and compare the dosimetric parameters obtained between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), three-dimensional field-in-field (3DFIF), 5-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT MF5), tangential IMRT (tIMRT), tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy (tVMAT), electronic tissue compensation (Ecomp), and Hybrid treatment plans. Material and Methods Thirty planning computed tomography datasets obtained from patients previously treated with whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) were utilized in this study. Treatment plans were created for 3DCRT, 3DFIF, IMRT MF5, tIMRT, tVMAT, Ecomp, and Hybrid techniques using Eclipse Treatment Planning System (version 13.6) with a prescribed dose of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions. Results Techniques with tangential beams produced statistically significantly better organs-at-risk (OARs) dosimetry (p < 0.001). Planning target volume Homogeneity Index (HI) was found to be significantly different among all techniques (p < 0.001), with Ecomp resulting in better HI (1.061 ± 0.029). Ecomp was also observed to require relatively shorter planning time (p < 0.001). Conclusions Techniques using tangential fields arrangements produced improved OARs dosimetry. Of all the treatment planning techniques employed in this study, Ecomp was found to be relatively easy to plan and produce acceptable dosimetry for WBRT in a short time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semaya Natalia Chen
- School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Prabhakar Ramachandran
- School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.,Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland, Australia
| | - Pradip Deb
- School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lizar JC, Volpato KC, Brandão FC, da Silva Guimarães F, Arruda GV, Pavoni JF. Tridimensional dose evaluation of the respiratory motion influence on breast radiotherapy treatments using conformal radiotherapy, forward IMRT, and inverse IMRT planning techniques. Phys Med 2021; 81:60-68. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
22
|
Case Report: Adjuvant Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy in a Patient With an Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Device. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:1380-1383. [PMID: 33305103 PMCID: PMC7718492 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.04.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
23
|
Liu YC, Chang HM, Lin HH, Lu CC, Lai LH. Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Hybrid Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy/Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Right Breast Cancer. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E3884. [PMID: 33260404 PMCID: PMC7760558 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9123884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to compare different types of right breast cancer radiotherapy planning techniques and to estimate the whole-body effective doses and the critical organ absorbed doses. The three planning techniques are intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT; two methods) and hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT (three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy/intensity-modulated radiotherapy). The VMAT technique includes two methods to deliver a dose: non-continuous partial arc and continuous partial arc. A thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) is placed in the RANDO phantom to estimate the organ absorbed dose. Each planning technique applies 50.4 Gy prescription dose and treats critical organs, including the lung and heart. Dose-volume histogram was used to show the planning target volume (V95%), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and other optimized indices. The estimation of whole-body effective dose was based on the International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP) Publication 60 and 103. The results were as follows: Continuous partial arc and non-continuous partial arc showed the best CI and HI. The heart absorbed doses in the continuous partial arc and hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT were 0.07 ± 0.01% and 0% (V5% and V10%, respectively). The mean dose of the heart was lowest in hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT (1.47 Gy ± 0.02). The dose in the left contralateral lung (V5%) was lowest in continuous partial arc (0%). The right ipsilateral lung average dose and V20% are lowest in continuous partial arc. Hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT has the lowest mean dose to contralateral breast (organs at risk). The whole-body effective doses for ICRP-60 and ICRP-103 were highest in continuous partial arc (2.01 Sv ± 0.23 and 2.89 Sv ± 0.15, respectively). In conclusion, the use of VMAT with continuous arc has a lower risk of radiation pneumonia, while hybrid 3D-CRT/IMRT attain lower secondary malignancy risk and cardiovascular complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chi Liu
- Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30015 Taiwan;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wei Gong Memorial Hospital, Miaoli 35148, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Ming Chang
- Department of General Surgery, Wei Gong Memorial Hospital, Miaoli 35159, Taiwan;
| | - Hsin-Hon Lin
- Medical Physics Research Center, Institute for Radiological Research, Chang Gung University/Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 20401, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chun Lu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan;
| | - Lu-Han Lai
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Technology, Yuanpei University of Medical Technology, Hsinchu 30015, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Patient-Specific Heart Constraint: A Tool for Optimization and Evaluation of Mean Heart Dose in Breast Cancer Patients. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 11:e154-e162. [PMID: 33130033 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our institution introduced a patient-specific heart constraint (PSHC) and a mean heart dose (MHD) constraint of 4 Gy for all patients receiving breast radiation therapy (RT) with a simultaneous boost (SIB). This was introduced as a method to calculate the predicted MHD before optimizing IMRT fields. We sought to determine whether the introduction of a PSHC reduced MHD, while maintaining optimally dosed treatment plans. MATERIAL/METHODS Patients were retrospectively divided into 2 groups, pre- and postintroduction of the PSHC. The breast and SIB Planning Target Volumes (PTVs) were prescribed to 50 Gy and 57 Gy, respectively, in 25 fractions. Plans were generated using a hybrid IMRT technique, 30 Gy using an open tangential field arrangement, and 27 Gy using IMRT fields. The PSHC was calculated using MHD of open tangential field × 2. A paired t test compared PTV coverage and heart doses between cohorts (P < .05 significant). RESULTS A total of 264 patients were included (138 pre-PSHC and 126 post-PSHC) with 137 right-sided and 127 left-sided treatments. MHD was significantly reduced across both right-sided (-0.4 Gy, P < .0001) and left-sided (-1.2 Gy, P < .0001) treatments overall. Left-sided treatments were further examined between free breathing and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). DIBH showed reduction in MHD, although it was not significant (-0.46 Gy, P = .34). Heart V5 Gy showed reduction in right-sided (-1%, P = .002) and left-sided (-9.2%, P < .0001) treatments overall. Left-sided free breathing showed significant reduction (-8.8%, P < .0001), and DIBH also showed significant reduction (-5.1%, P = .0034). Tumor bed doses remained above the 54.15 Gy (95% of 57 Gy) threshold for all plans. CONCLUSION Introduction of a PSHC can reduce MHD and V5 Gy for patients receiving whole breast RT with SIB while maintaining optimally dosed plans, with the greatest benefit shown for left-sided, free-breathing treatments.
Collapse
|
25
|
Archibald-Heeren B, Byrne M, Hu Y, Liu G, Collett N, Cai M, Wang Y. Single click automated breast planning with iterative optimization. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:88-97. [PMID: 33016622 PMCID: PMC7700918 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To present the development of an in‐house coded solution for treatment planning of tangential breast radiotherapy that creates single click plans by emulating the iterative optimization process of human dosimetrists. Method One hundred clinical breast cancer patients were retrospectively planned with an automated planning (AP) code incorporating the hybrid intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) approach. The code automates all planning processes including plan generation, beam generation, gantry and collimator angle determination, open segments and dynamic IMRT fluence and calculations. Thirty‐nine dose volume histogram (DVH) metrics taken from three international recommendations were compared between the automated and clinical plans (CP), along with median interquartile analysis of the DVH distributions. Total planning time and delivery QA were also compared between the plan sets. Results Of the 39 planning metrics analyzed 23 showed no significant difference between clinical and automated planning techniques. Of the 16 metrics with statistically significant variations, 2 were improved in the clinical plans in comparison to 14 improved in the AP plans. Automated plans produced a greater number of ideal plans against international guidelines as per EviQ (AP:77%, CP:68%), RTOG 1005 (AP:80%, CP:71%), and London Cancer references (AP:80%, CP:75%). Delivery QA results for both techniques were equivalent. Automated planning techniques resulted in an average reduction in planning time from 23 to 5 minutes. Conclusion We have introduced an automated planning code with iterative optimization that produces equivalent quality plans to manual clinical planning. The resultant change in workflow results in a reduction in treatment planning times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mikel Byrne
- Icon Cancer Centres, Wahroonga, NSW, Australia
| | - Yunfei Hu
- Icon Cancer Centres, Wahroonga, NSW, Australia
| | - Guilin Liu
- Icon Cancer Centres, Wahroonga, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Meng Cai
- Icon Cancer Centres, Wahroonga, NSW, Australia
| | - Yang Wang
- Icon Cancer Centres, Wahroonga, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen CH, Hsieh CC, Chang CS, Chen MF. A Retrospective Analysis of Dose Distribution and Toxicity in Patients with Left Breast Cancer Treated with Adjuvant Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy: Comparison with Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:9173-9182. [PMID: 33061609 PMCID: PMC7532038 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s269893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A better understanding of the organs-at-risk (OAR) dose metrics and the related toxicity induced by radiotherapy (RT) for left breast cancer (BC) will improve the quality of life. This study addressed the issue for left-BC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Patients and Methods Between 2012 and 2018, 308 left-BC patients underwent adjuvant RT at our hospital. Before June 2015, 134 patients were treated with 3D-CRT. Thereafter, 174 patients underwent IMRT. The patient’s characteristics in the IMRT group did not significantly different compared to those in the 3D-CRT group. Results Among the total study population, the incidence of ≥grade 2 radiation dermatitis (RID) was 17.3%. Higher volumes receiving 105% (≥5.7%) and 107% (≥1%) of prescribed dose and 3D-CRT technique were associated with a higher risk of RID. Regarding lung toxicity, the mean lung dose (≥10.2Gy) and V20 (≥20%) of ipsilateral lung were significantly associated with the incidence of RT-induced pulmonary changes. By dosimetry analysis, IMRT achieved better dose conformity and delivered lower mean doses to heart and ipsilateral lung compared to 3D-CRT. Furthermore, propensity sore and multivariate analysis showed that IMRT technique helped to reduce RT-induced dermatitis and lung toxicity. Conclusion Our data suggest that the volume of OAR exposed to higher doses is a predictor of RT-induced toxicity. Adjuvant RT with IMRT technique offered better dose conformity and spared high-dose levels to OARs to reduce radiation-related morbidity for BC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Hsin Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chuan Hsieh
- Department of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Shen Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Miao-Fen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Xie Y, Bourgeois D, Guo B, Zhang R. Comparison of conventional and advanced radiotherapy techniques for left-sided breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. Med Dosim 2020; 45:e9-e16. [PMID: 32646715 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) after breast conserving surgery is the standard treatment to prevent recurrence and metastasis of early stage breast cancer. This study aims to compare seven WBRT techniques including conventional tangential, field-in-field (FIF), hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), IMRT, standard volumetric modulated arc therapy (STD-VMAT), noncoplanar VMAT (NC-VMAT), and multiple arc VMAT (MA-VMAT). Fifteen patients who were previously diagnosed with left-sided early stage breast cancer and treated in our clinic were selected for this study. WBRT plans were created for these patients and were evaluated based on target coverage and normal tissue toxicities. All techniques produced clinically acceptable WBRT plans. STD-VMAT delivered the lowest mean dose (1.1 ± 0.3 Gy) and the lowest maximum dose (7.3 ± 4.9 Gy) to contralateral breast, and the second lowest lifetime attributable risk (LAR) (4.1 ± 1.4%) of secondary contralateral breast cancer. MA-VMAT delivered the lowest mean dose to lungs (4.9 ± 0.9 Gy) and heart (5.5 ± 1.2 Gy), exhibited the lowest LAR (1.7 ± 0.3%) of secondary lung cancer, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) (1.2 ± 0.2%) of pneumonitis, risk of coronary events (RCE) (10.3 ± 2.7%), and LAR (3.9 ± 1.3%) of secondary contralateral breast cancer. NC-VMAT plans provided the most conformal target coverage, the lowest maximum lung dose (46.2 ± 4.1 Gy) and heart dose (41.1 ± 5.4 Gy), and the second lowest LAR (1.8 ± 0.4%) of secondary lung cancer and RCE (10.5 ± 2.8%). MA-VMAT and NC-VMAT could be the preferred techniques for early stage breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yibo Xie
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Daniel Bourgeois
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Beibei Guo
- Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Rui Zhang
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Whole breast external beam radiotherapy in elderly patients affected by left-sided early breast cancer: a dosimetric comparison between two simple free-breathing techniques. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32:1335-1341. [PMID: 31429001 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-019-01312-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elderly breast cancer patients are frequently affected by significant comorbidities that make sophisticated radiotherapy treatments particularly challenging. AIMS We dosimetrically analyzed two different simple free-breathing external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) techniques for the hypofractionated treatment of the left breast in elderly patients with a low compliance, to compare target coverage, and heart and left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA) sparing. METHODS We developed radiation plans for 24 elderly patients using 3D conformal (3DCRT) field-in-field tangential technique and intensity-modulated (IMRT) tangential beam technique. Dose-Volume-Histograms (DVHs) were used to provide a quantitative comparison between plans. RESULTS The median breast volume was 645 cm3. IMRT and 3DCRT plans comparison demonstrated no significant differences in terms of organ sparing for the heart. Regarding LADCA, mean dose (10.3 ± 9.5 Gy vs 11.9 ± 9.6 Gy, p = 0.0003), maximum dose (26.1 ± 16.1 Gy vs 29.1 ± 16.1 Gy, p = 0.004) and V17 Gy (21.5% ± 26.9% vs 25.0% ± 27.2%, p = 0.002) significantly decreased using IMRT compared with 3DCRT. IMRT plans showed a better target coverage compared with 3DCRT (0.91 ± 0.05 vs 0.93 ± 0.04, p = 0.05). DISCUSSION Comparing the two different EBRT techniques, we demonstrated few, although substantial, dosimetric differences in terms of doses to the organs at risk characterized by a statistically significant dose reduction of LADCA in the IMRT plans. CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients with a low compliance to treatment might benefit from 3DCRT with field-in-field tangential arrangement or from a simple IMRT approach. IMRT should be preferred.
Collapse
|
29
|
Rafic KM, Patricia S, Timothy Peace B, Sujith CJ, Selvamani B, Ravindran PB. Dosimetric and clinical advantages of adapting the DIBH technique to hybrid solitary dynamic portal radiotherapy for left-sided chest-wall plus regional nodal irradiation. Med Dosim 2020; 45:256-263. [PMID: 32362370 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate the dosimetric and clinical advantages of using deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique in hybrid solitary dynamic portal radiotherapy (hSDPRT) for left-sided chest-wall plus regional nodal irradiation and to demonstrate a simplified strategy for preclinical commissioning and calibration of DIBH-gating technique. Fifteen patients with left-sided breast cancer who underwent postmastectomy radiotherapy using hSDPRT were retrospectively evaluated. Two sets of planning-CT images were acquired for each patient, one with free/normal breathing and the other with DIBH. The hSDPRT plans were computed to deliver about 85% of the prescribed dose using static open fields and 15% of dose using a less complex solitary dynamic field. The dosimetric differences between the paired samples were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For clinical commissioning of gated treatments, a respiratory simulator equipped with a microcontroller was programmed to simulate free-breathing and DIBH-patterns using a custom-developed android application. While both the hSDPRT plans displayed identical target coverage on both the image-sets, the DIBH technique resulted in statistically significant differences in various dose-volume metrics of heart, left-anterior-descending artery, and ipsilateral-lung structures. The hSDPRT plan with DIBH entails reduced total monitor unit (354.9 ± 13.6 MU) and breath-hold time ranging from 2.9 ± 0.3 to 13.7 ± 0.8 seconds/field, along with an acceptable impact on overall machine throughput. DIBH is a feasible method to effectively address the delivery uncertainty and produce substantial sparing of heart and lung when combined with hSDPRT. Streamlined procedures for commissioning and calibration of DIBH-gating technique are essential for more efficient clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kather Mohamathu Rafic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632004, Tamil Nadu, India.
| | - Solomon Patricia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632004, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Balasingh Timothy Peace
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632004, Tamil Nadu, India.
| | - Christopher J Sujith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632004, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Backianathan Selvamani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632004, Tamil Nadu, India.
| | - Paul B Ravindran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632004, Tamil Nadu, India; Dosimetry and Medical Radiation Physics Section, Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna 1400, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Liu FY, Dong ZW, Yang HB, Shi HY. Evaluation of the clinical application of Auto-Planning module for IMRT plans of left breast cancer. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
31
|
Hybrid planning techniques for hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation using flattening filter-free beams. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 196:376-385. [PMID: 31863154 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01555-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams in hybrid intensity-modulated radiation therapy (H-IMRT) and hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT) for left-sided whole-breast radiation therapy with a boost volume (RT) using a hypofractionated dose regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS RT plans of 25 patients with left-sided early-stage breast cancer were created with H‑IMRT and H‑VMAT techniques under breath-hold conditions using 6‑MV FFF beams. In hybrid techniques, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) plans were kept as base-dose plans for the VMAT and IMRT plans. In addition, H‑IMRT in step-and-shoot mode was also calculated to assess its achievability with FFF beams. RESULTS All hybrid plans achieved the expected target coverage. H‑VMAT showed better coverage and homogeneity index results for the boost target (p < 0.002), while H‑IMRT presented better results for the whole-breast target (p < 0.001). Mean doses to normal tissues were comparable between both plans, while H‑IMRT reduced the low-dose levels to heart and ipsilateral lung (p < 0.05). H‑VMAT revealed significantly better results with regard to monitor units (MU) and treatment time (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The 6‑MV FFF beam technique is feasible for large-field 3DCRT-based hybrid planning in whole-breast and boost planning target volume irradiation. For breath-hold patients, the H‑VMAT plan is superior to H‑IMRT for hypofractionated dose regimens, with reduced MU and treatment delivery time.
Collapse
|
32
|
Haciislamoglu E, Cinar Y, Gurcan F, Canyilmaz E, Gungor G, Yoney A. Secondary cancer risk after whole-breast radiation therapy: field-in-field versus intensity modulated radiation therapy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20190317. [PMID: 31295011 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In this study, we used the concept of organ-equivalent dose (OED) to evaluate the excess absolute risk (EAR) for secondary cancer in various organs after radiation treatment for breast cancer. METHODS Using CT data set of 12 patients, we generated three different whole-breast radiation treatment plans using 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with a field-in-field (FinF) technique, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The OEDs were calculated from differential dose-volume histograms on the basis of the "linear-exponential," "plateau," and "full mechanistic" dose-response models. Secondary cancer risks of the contralateral breast (CB), contralateral lung (CL), and ipsilateral lung (IL) were estimated and compared. RESULTS The lowest EARs for the CB, CL, and IL were achieved with FinF, which reduced the EARs by 77%, 88%, and 56% relative to those with IMRT, and by 77%, 84%, and 58% relative to those with VMAT, respectively. The secondary cancer risk for FinF was significantly lower than those of IMRT and VMAT. OED-based secondary cancer risks for CB and IL were similar when IMRT and VMAT were used, but the risk for CL was statistically lower when VMAT was used. CONCLUSION The overall estimation of EAR indicated that the radiation-induced cancer risk of breast radiation therapy was lower with FinF than with IMRT and VMAT. Therefore, when secondary cancer risk is a major concern, FinF is considered to be the preferred treatment option in irradiation of whole-breast. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Secondary malignancy estimation after breast radiotherapy is becoming an important subject for comparative treatment planning.When secondary cancer risk a major concern, FinF technique is considered the preferred treatment option in whole breast patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emel Haciislamoglu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Yunus Cinar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Faculty of Medicine, Rize, Turkey
| | - Fatih Gurcan
- Department of Computer Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Engineering, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Emine Canyilmaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Gorkem Gungor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Adnan Yoney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy for whole breast irradiation: a dosimetric comparison of different arc designs. Radiol Med 2019; 124:546-554. [PMID: 30701385 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-019-00994-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To find an optimal arc design for hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT), a combination of conventional 3DCRT and VMAT plans for left-sided whole breast radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 26 left-sided early-stage breast cancer patients were selected for this study. To find the superior plan, H-VMAT with three different arc designs including, two partial arcs (2A), four partial arcs (4A) and four tangential arcs (TA) were created for each study case by combining 3DCRT and VMAT with 75% 3DCRT/25% VMAT dose proportion of prescription dose. RESULTS All H-VMAT plans achieved the expected target coverage. A higher conformity index and homogeneity index were achieved for 2A and 4A H-VMAT plans and significantly differ from TA H-VMAT (p < 0.003). The heart and ipsilateral lung dose parameters were comparable among all plans except heart V40Gy which was significantly less in 4A H-VMAT plan (p < 0.05). The contralateral lung, contralateral breast, spinal cord, normal tissue doses and MU were significantly less in TA H-VMAT (p < 0.03). The beam-on time was significantly less in 2A H-VMAT (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION 2A and 4A H-VMAT techniques are effective in improving the PTV dosimetric parameters as well as reducing the OAR doses. Further, 2A H-VMAT delivers less MU and beam-on time compared to 4A H-VMAT.
Collapse
|
34
|
Chan TY, Tang JI, Tan PW, Roberts N. Dosimetric evaluation and systematic review of radiation therapy techniques for early stage node-negative breast cancer treatment. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:4853-4870. [PMID: 30425577 PMCID: PMC6205528 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s172818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is essential in treating women with early stage breast cancer. Early stage node-negative breast cancer (ESNNBC) offers a good prognosis; hence, late effects of breast RT becomes increasingly important. Recent literature suggests a potential for an increase in cardiac and pulmonary events after RT. However, these studies have not taken into account the impact of newer and current RT techniques that are now available. Hence, this review aimed to evaluate the clinical evidence for each technique and determine the optimal radiation technique for ESNNBC treatment. Currently, six RT techniques are consistently used and studied: 1) prone positioning, 2) proton beam RT, 3) intensity-modulated RT, 4) breath-hold, 5) partial breast irradiation, and 6) intraoperative RT. These techniques show dosimetric promise. However, limited data on late cardiac and pulmonary events exist due to challenges in long-term follow-up. Moving forward, future studies are needed to validate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of these current techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tabitha Y Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore,
| | - Johann I Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore,
| | - Poh Wee Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore,
| | - Neill Roberts
- Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zeverino M, Petersson K, Kyroudi A, Jeanneret-Sozzi W, Bourhis J, Bochud F, Moeckli R. A treatment planning comparison of contemporary photon-based radiation techniques for breast cancer. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2018; 7:32-38. [PMID: 33458403 PMCID: PMC7807600 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Background and purpose Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) of the whole breast (WB) is still the standard treatment for early breast cancer. A variety of radiation techniques is currently available according to different delivery strategies. This study aims to provide a comparison of six treatment planning strategies commonly adopted for breast-conserving adjuvant RT and to use the Pareto concept in an attempt to assess the degree of plan optimization. Materials and methods Two groups of six left- and five right-sided cases with different dose prescriptions were involved (22 patients in total). Field-in-Field (FiF), two and four Fields static-IMRT (sIMRT-2f and sIMRT-4f), Volumetric-Modulated-Arc-Therapy (VMAT), Helical Tomotherapy (HT) and Static-Angles Tomotherapy (TomoDirect™ – TD) were planned. Dose volume constraints were taken from the RTOG protocol 1005. Pareto fronts were built for a selected case to evaluate the reliability of the plan optimization process. Results The best target dose coverage was observed for TD able to improve significantly (p < 0.01) the V95% in a range varying from 1.2% to 7.5% compared to other techniques. The V105% was significantly reduced up to 2% for HT (p < 0.05) although FiF and VMAT produced similar values. For the ipsilateral lung, V5Gy, V10Gy and Dmean were significantly lower than all other techniques (p < 0.02) for TD while the lowest value of V20Gy was observed for HT. The maximum dose to contralateral breast was significantly lowest for TD (p < 0.02) and for FiF (p < 0.05). Minor differences were observed for the heart in left-sided patients. Plans for all tested techniques were found to lie on their respective Pareto fronts. Conclusions Overall, TD provided significantly better results in terms of target coverage and dose sparing of ipsilateral lung with respect to all other evaluated techniques. It also significantly minimized dose to contralateral breast together with FiF. Pareto front analysis confirmed the reliability of the optimization for a selected case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Zeverino
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Archonteia Kyroudi
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Wendy Jeanneret-Sozzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Francois Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphael Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lee TF, Sung KC, Chao PJ, Huang YJ, Lan JH, Wu HY, Chang L, Ting HM. Relationships among patient characteristics, irradiation treatment planning parameters, and treatment toxicity of acute radiation dermatitis after breast hybrid intensity modulation radiation therapy. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0200192. [PMID: 30011291 PMCID: PMC6047778 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2017] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
To evaluate the relationships among patient characteristics, irradiation treatment planning parameters, and treatment toxicity of acute radiation dermatitis (RD) after breast hybrid intensity modulation radiation therapy (IMRT). The study cohort consisted of 95 breast cancer patients treated with hybrid IMRT. RD grade ≥2 (2+) toxicity was defined as clinically significant. Patient characteristics and the irradiation treatment planning parameters were used as the initial candidate factors. Prognostic factors were identified using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-based normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model. A univariate cut-off dose NTCP model was developed to find the dose-volume limitation. Fifty-two (54.7%) of ninety-five patients experienced acute RD grade 2+ toxicity. The volume of skin receiving a dose >35 Gy (V35) was the most significant dosimetric predictor associated with RD grade 2+ toxicity. The NTCP model parameters for V35Gy were TV50 = 85.7 mL and γ50 = 0.77, where TV50 was defined as the volume corresponding to a 50% incidence of complications, and γ50 was the normalized slope of the volume-response curve. Additional potential predictive patient characteristics were energy and surgery, but the results were not statistically significant. To ensure a better quality of life and compliance for breast hybrid IMRT patients, the skin volume receiving a dose >35 Gy should be limited to <85.7 mL to keep the incidence of RD grade 2+ toxicities below 50%. To avoid RD toxicity, the volume of skin receiving a dose >35 Gy should follow sparing tolerance and the inherent patient characteristics should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsair-Fwu Lee
- Medical Physics and Informatics Laboratory of Electronics Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Kuo-Chiang Sung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.,Department of Electrical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Pei-Ju Chao
- Medical Physics and Informatics Laboratory of Electronics Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yu-Jie Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Jen-Hong Lan
- Medical Physics and Informatics Laboratory of Electronics Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Horng-Yuan Wu
- Department of Electrical Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Liyun Chang
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Hui-Min Ting
- Medical Physics and Informatics Laboratory of Electronics Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Balaji K, Yadav P, BalajiSubramanian S, Anu Radha C, Ramasubramanian V. Hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy for chest wall irradiation: For a good plan, get the right mixture. Phys Med 2018; 52:86-92. [PMID: 30139614 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.06.641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To find the optimal dose weighting for hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT), a combination of conventional 3DCRT and VMAT plans for left sided chest wall and supraclavicular radiation therapy. METHODS & MATERIALS 20 left-sided breast cancer patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy were considered for this study. To find the optimal weighting, 5 H-VMAT plans were generated for each study case by combining different dose proportions of 3DCRT and VMAT plans including: 90% 3DCRT/10% VMAT, 80% 3DCRT/20% VMAT, 70% 3DCRT/30% VMAT, 60% 3DCRT/40% VMAT, 50% 3DCRT/50% VMAT. Further field-in-field, optimal H-VMAT and VMAT alone plans were compared. RESULTS All H-VMAT plans achieved the expected target coverage. A higher conformity index was achieved for 50% 3DCRT/50% VMAT plan, while better homogeneity index was achieved for 80% 3DCRT/20% VMAT plan. Mean and low doses were less in 90% 3DCRT/10% VMAT plan. Compared with other proportions, 80% 3DCRT/20% VMAT and 70% 3DCRT/30% VMAT weighted H-VMAT plans achieved balanced results for PTVs and OARs. CONCLUSION The optimal dose mixture for H-VMAT technique is 70% to 80% for 3DCRT and 20% to 30% for VMAT. The optimal H-VMAT achieved balanced results for the PTVs and OARs compared with field-in-field and VMAT alone plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karunakaran Balaji
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gleneagles Global Hospitals, Chennai, India; School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
| | - Poonam Yadav
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zhang Y, Wang H, Huang X, Zhang Q, Ren R, Sun R, Zheng Z, Dong S, Zheng A. Dosimetric comparison of TomoDirect, helical tomotherapy, VMAT, and ff-IMRT for upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Med Dosim 2018; 44:167-172. [PMID: 29950277 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2018.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Revised: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The new TomoDirect (TD) modality offers a nonrotational option with discrete beam angles. We aim to compare dosimetric parameters of TD, helical tomotherapy (HT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (ff-IMRT) for upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma (EC). METHODS Twenty patients with cT2-4N0-1M0 upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) were enrolled. Four plans were generated using the same dose objectives for each patient: TD, HT, VMAT with a single arc, and ff-IMRT with 5 fields (5F). The prescribed doses were used to deliver 50.4 Gy/28F to the planning target volume (PTV50.4) and then provided a 9 Gy/5F boost to PTV59.4. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) statistics, dose uniformity, and dose homogeneity were analyzed to compare treatment plans. RESULTS For PTV59.4, the D2, D98, Dmean, and V100% values in HT were significantly lower than other plans (all p < 0.05), and those in TD were significantly lower than VMAT and ff-IMRT (all p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the D2 and Dmean values between VMAT and ff-IMRT techniques (p > 0.05). The homogeneity index (HI) differed significantly for the 4 techniques of TD, HT, VMAT, and ff-IMRT (0.03 ± 0.01, 0.02 ± 0.01, 0.06 ± 0.02, and 0.05 ± 0.01, respectively; p < 0.001). The HI for TD was similar to HT (p = 0.166), and had statistically significant improvement compared to VMAT (p < 0.001) and ff-IMRT (p = 0.003). In comparison with the 4 conformity indices (CIs), there was no significant difference (p > 0.05). For PTV50.4, the D2 and Dmean values in HT were significantly lower than other plans (all p < 0.05), and those in TD were significantly lower than VMAT and ff-IMRT (all p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the D2 and Dmean values between VMAT and ff-IMRT techniques (p > 0.05). No D98 and V100% parameters differed significantly among the 4 treatment types (p > 0.05). HT plans were provided for statistically significant improvement in HI (0.03 ± 0.01) compared to TD plans (0.05 ± 0.01, p = 0.003), VMAT (0.08 ± 0.03, p < 0.001), ff-IMRT (0.08 ± 0.01, p < 0.001). The HI revealed that TD was superior to VMAT and ff-IMRT (p < 0.05). The CI differed significantly for the 4 techniques of TD, HT, VMAT, and ff-IMRT (0.59 ± 0.10, 0.69 ± 0.11, 0.64 ± 0.09, and 0.64 ± 0.11, respectively; p = 0.035). The best CI was yielded by HT. We found no significant difference for the V5, V10, V15, V30, and the mean lung dose (MLD) among the 4 techniques (all p > 0.05). However, the V20 differed significantly among TD, HT, VMAT, and ff-IMRT (21.50 ± 7.20%, 19.50 ± 5.55%, 17.65 ± 5.45%, and 16.35 ± 5.70%, respectively; p = 0.047). Average V20 for the lungs was significantly improved by the TD plans compared to VMAT (p = 0.047), and ff-IMRT (p = 0.008). The V5 value of the lung in TD was 49.30 ± 13.01%, lower than other plans, but there was no significant difference (p > 0.05). The D1 of the spinal cord showed no significant difference among the 4 techniques (p = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS All techniques are able to provide a homogeneous and highly conformal dose distribution. The TD technique is a good option for treating upper thoracic EC involvement. It could achieve optimal low dose to the lungs and spinal cord with acceptable PTV coverage. HT is a good option as it could achieve quality dose conformality and uniformity, while TD generated superior conformality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaowen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, Henan, China
| | - Huitao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, Henan, China
| | - Xiao Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, Henan, China
| | - Qiang Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, Henan, China
| | - Runchuan Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, Henan, China
| | - Ronggang Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, Henan, China
| | - Zhiyong Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, Henan, China
| | - Shangwen Dong
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
| | - Anping Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anyang Cancer Hospital, Anyang, Henan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Guttmann DM, Gabriel P, Kennedy C, Rate W, Grizos W, Nagda S, Wojtowicz L, Lin L, Freedman GM. Comparison of acute toxicities between contemporary forward-planned 3D conformal radiotherapy and inverse-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy for whole breast radiation. Breast J 2017; 24:128-132. [PMID: 28703444 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Revised: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 11/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The use of inverse-planned intensity-modulated radiation therapy for whole breast radiation treatment has become more prevalent, but this may impose an increased cost on the health system. We hypothesized that when applied with the same treatment planning goals, tangential forward-planned field-in-field 3D conformal radiotherapy and tangential inverse-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy would be associated with comparable toxicities. Women who underwent tangential whole breast irradiation at our institution from 2011 to 2015 planned using either forward-planned field-in-field 3D conformal radiotherapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Grade 2+ Radiation dermatitis was the primary endpoint. A total of 201 and 212 women had undergone field-in-field 3D conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy, respectively. No differences were observed between the two modalities regarding acute radiation dermatitis, breast pain, or fatigue. In a multivariable logistic regression that incorporated the use of boost, hypofractionation, use of chemotherapy, patient positioning, use of a supraclavicular field, and breast planning target volume, intensity-modulated radiotherapy was not correlated with different rates of Grade 2+ radiation dermatitis. This study supports the routine first-line use of field-in-field 3D conformal radiotherapy for whole breast radiation instead of tangential intensity-modulated radiotherapy from the standpoint of equivalence in acute toxicity. Further investigation is needed to assess whether there are subgroups of women who may still benefit from intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Guttmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Peter Gabriel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher Kennedy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - William Rate
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - William Grizos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Suneel Nagda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lisa Wojtowicz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lilie Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gary M Freedman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rafic KM, Peace BST, Babu SES, Singh IRR. A Hybrid Conformal Planning Technique with Solitary Dynamic Portal for Postmastectomy Radiotherapy with Regional Nodes. J Med Phys 2017; 42:116-122. [PMID: 28974855 PMCID: PMC5618456 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_3_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2017] [Revised: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study focuses on incorporation of a solitary dynamic portal (SDP) in conformal planning for postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) with nodal regions with an intention to overcome the treatment planning limitations imposed by conventional techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-four patients who underwent surgical mastectomy followed by PMRT were included in this study. Initially, a treatment plan comprising tangential beams fitted to beam's-eye-view (BEV) of chest wall (CW) and a direct anterior field fitted to BEV of nodal region, both sharing a single isocenter was generated using Eclipse treatment planning system. Multiple field-in-fields with optimum beam weights (5% per field) were added primarily from the medial tangent, fitted to BEV of entire target volume, and finally converted into a dynamic portal. Dosimetric analysis for the treatment plans and fluence verification for the dynamic portals were performed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Conformal plans with SDP showed excellent dose coverage (V95%>95%), higher degree of tumor dose conformity (≤1.25) and homogeneity (≤0.12) without compromising the organ at risk sparing for PMRT with nodal region. Treatment plans with SDP considerably reduced the lower isodose spread to the ipsilateral lung, heart, and healthy tissue without affecting the dose homogeneity. Further, gamma evaluation showed more than 96% pixel pass rate for standard 3%/3 mm dose difference and distance-to-agreement criteria. Moreover, this plan offers less probability of "geometrical miss" at the highly irregular CW with regional nodal radiotherapy. CONCLUSION Hybrid conformal plans with SDP would facilitate improved dose distribution and reduced uncertainty in delivery and promises to be a suitable treatment option for complex postmastectomy CW with regional nodal irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. Mohamathu Rafic
- Department of Radiotherapy, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - B. S. Timothy Peace
- Department of Radiotherapy, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | - I. Rabi Raja Singh
- Department of Radiotherapy, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
BalajiSubramanian S, Balaji K, Thirunavukarasu M, Premkumar S. Sparing dysphagia/aspiration related structures using novel hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy. Phys Med 2017; 39:80-87. [PMID: 28619290 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.05.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2016] [Revised: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Studies using split field IMRT to spare dysphagia/aspiration related structures (DARS) have raised concern regarding dose uncertainty at matchline. This study explores the utility of hybrid VMAT in sparing the DARS and assesses matchline dose uncertainty in postoperative oral cavity cancer patients and compares it with VMAT. METHODS & MATERIALS Ten postoperative oral cavity cancer patients were planned with h-VMAT and VMAT using the same planning CT dataset. PTV and DARS were contoured using standard delineation guidelines. In h-VMAT 80% of the neck dose was planned using AP/PA technique and then VMAT optimization was done for the total PTV by keeping the corresponding AP/PA plan as the base dose. Planning goal for PTV was V95%≥95% and for DARS, adequate sparing. Plans and dose volume histograms were analyzed using dosimetric indices. Absolute point and portal dose measurements were done for h-VMAT plans to verify dose at the matchline. RESULTS Coverage in both the techniques was comparable. Significant differences were observed in mean doses to DARS (Larynx: 24.36±2.51 versus 16.88±2.41Gy; p<0.0006, Pharyngeal constrictors: 25.16±2.41 versus 21.2±2.1Gy; p<0.005, Esophageal inlet: 18.71±2 versus 12.06±0.79Gy; p<0.0002) favoring h-VMAT. Total MU in both the techniques was comparable. Average percentage variations in point dose measurements in h-VMAT done at +3.5 and -3.5 positions were (1.47±1.48 and 2.28±1.35%) respectively. Average gamma agreement for portal dose measured was 97.07%. CONCLUSION h-VMAT achieves better sparing of DARS with no matchline dose uncertainty. Since these patients have swallowing dysfunction post-operatively, attempts should be made to spare these critical structures as much as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karunakaran Balaji
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gleneagles Global Hospitals, Chennai, India; School of Advanced Sciences, VIT University, Vellore, India
| | | | - Sumana Premkumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gleneagles Global Hospitals, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Chan TY, Tan PW, Tang JI. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer: is it ready for prime time? BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY 2017; 9:177-183. [PMID: 28360536 PMCID: PMC5365280 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s127583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Whole breast external beam radiotherapy (WBEBRT) is commonly used as an essential arm in the treatment management of women with early-stage breast cancer. Dosimetry planning for conventional WBEBRT typically involves a pair of tangential fields. Advancement in radiation technology and techniques has the potential to improve treatment outcomes with clinically meaningful long-term benefits. However, this advancement must be balanced with safety and improved efficacy. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is an advanced technique that shows promise in improving the planning process and radiation delivery. Early data on utilizing IMRT for WBEBRT demonstrate more homogenous dose distribution with reduction in organs at risk doses. This translates to toxicities reduction. The two common descriptors for IMRT are forward-planning "fields in field" and inverse planning. Unlike IMRT for other organs, the aim of IMRT for breast planning is to achieve dose homogeneity and not organ conformality. The aim of this paper was to evaluate whether IMRT is ready for prime time based on these three points: 1) workload impact, 2) the clinical impact on the patient's quality of life, and 3) the appropriateness and applicability to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tabitha Y Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Poh Wee Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Johann I Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Chen YG, Li AC, Li WY, Huang MY, Li XB, Chen MQ, Zhang M, Xu BH. The Feasibility Study of a Hybrid Coplanar Arc Technique Versus Hybrid Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Treatment of Early-stage Left-sided Breast Cancer with Simultaneous-integrated Boost. J Med Phys 2017; 42:1-8. [PMID: 28405101 PMCID: PMC5370332 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_105_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
This study demonstrated the feasibility and advantages of a hybrid, volumetric arc therapy technique that used two 90° coplanar arcs and two three-dimensional conformal tangential beams in the simultaneous-integrated boost radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery. A total of nine patients with stage I, left-sided breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery were selected for this retrospective study. For each patient, a hybrid arc plan was generated and then compared with two hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans. All plans were optimized using the same objectives and dose constraints. The prescription dose was 50.4 Gy to the planning target volume with simultaneous boost to 60 Gy to the expanded gross target volume in 28 fractions. The differences among these hybrid plans were analyzed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test. The hybrid arc plans achieved the clinical requirements of target dose coverage and normal tissue (NT) dose constraints. It was found that the hybrid arc plans showed advantages in the conformity index of the expanded gross target volume, the V5 of the heart, the D2 of the left ventricle, and the D2 and V50.4 of NTs. The average beam-on time and monitor units of the hybrid arc plans were significantly lower (P < 0.001).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Gui Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - An-Chuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Wen-Yao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Miao-Yun Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Xiao-Bo Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Ming-Qiu Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Mutian Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Ben-Hua Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mitchell RA, Wai P, Colgan R, Kirby AM, Donovan EM. Improving the efficiency of breast radiotherapy treatment planning using a semi-automated approach. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18:18-24. [PMID: 28291912 PMCID: PMC5689888 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To reduce treatment planning times while maintaining plan quality through the introduction of semi-automated planning techniques for breast radiotherapy. METHODS Automatic critical structure delineation was examined using the Smart Probabilistic Image Contouring Engine (SPICE) commercial autosegmentation software (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Fitchburg, WI) for a cohort of ten patients. Semiautomated planning was investigated by employing scripting in the treatment planning system to automate segment creation for breast step-and-shoot planning and create objectives for segment weight optimization; considerations were made for three different multileaf collimator (MLC) configurations. Forty patients were retrospectively planned using the script and a planning time comparison performed. RESULTS The SPICE heart and lung outlines agreed closely with clinician-defined outlines (median Dice Similarity Coefficient > 0.9); median difference in mean heart dose was 0.0 cGy (range -10.8 to 5.4 cGy). Scripted treatment plans demonstrated equivalence with their clinical counterparts. No statistically significant differences were found for target parameters. Minimal ipsilateral lung dose increases were also observed. Statistically significant (P < 0.01) time reductions were achievable for MLCi and Agility MLC (Elekta Ltd, Crawley, UK) plans (median 4.9 and 5.9 min, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The use of commercial autosegmentation software enables breast plan adjustment based on doses to organs at risk. Semi-automated techniques for breast radiotherapy planning offer modest reductions in planning times. However, in the context of a typical department's breast radiotherapy workload, minor savings per plan translate into greater efficiencies overall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Mitchell
- Joint Department of PhysicsThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer ResearchSuttonSurreyUK
| | - Philip Wai
- Joint Department of PhysicsThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer ResearchSuttonSurreyUK
| | - Ruth Colgan
- Joint Department of PhysicsThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer ResearchSuttonSurreyUK
| | - Anna M Kirby
- Department of RadiotherapyThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustSuttonSurreyUK
| | - Ellen M Donovan
- Joint Department of PhysicsThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer ResearchSuttonSurreyUK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Jiang S, Wang J, Li H, Liao L, Li Y, Wang X, Yang Y, Zhu RX, Sahoo N, Gillin MT, Hojo Y, Sun J, Chang JY, Liao Z, Grosshans D, Frank SJ, Zhang X. Novel Hybrid Scattering- and Scanning-Beam Proton Therapy Approach. Int J Part Ther 2016; 3:37-50. [PMID: 31772974 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-15-00014.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2015] [Accepted: 04/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether a hybrid intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and passive scattered proton therapy (PSPT) technique, termed HimpsPT, could be adopted as an alternative delivery method for patients demanding scanning beam proton therapy. Patients and Methods We identified 3 representative clinical cases-an oropharyngeal cancer, skull base chordoma, and stage III non-small-cell lung cancer-that had been treated with IMPT at our center. We retrospectively redesigned these cases using HimpsPT. The PSPT plans for all three cases were designed with the same prescriptions as those used in the IMPT plans. In this way, the whole treatment was delivered using alternating or sequential PSPT and IMPT. Results All HimpsPT plans met the clinical dose criteria and were of similar quality as the IMPT plans. In the skull base case, the mixed plan was more effective at sparing the brain stem because the sharp penumbra of the aperture in the PSPT plans was not present in the IMPT plans. The HimpsPT plans were more robust than the clinical IMPT plans generated without robust optimization. Conclusion The HimpsPT delivery technique can achieve a treatment-plan quality similar to that of IMPT, even in the most challenging clinical cases. In addition, at centers equipped with both scattering and scanning beam capabilities, the HimpsPT technique may allow more patients to benefit from scanning beam technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengpeng Jiang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Jingqian Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Li Liao
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yupeng Li
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Applied Research, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Xiaochun Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yining Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ronald X Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Narayan Sahoo
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Gillin
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yoshifumi Hojo
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jian Sun
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Haciislamoglu E, Colak F, Canyilmaz E, Zengin AY, Yilmaz AH, Yoney A, Bahat Z. The choice of multi-beam IMRT for whole breast radiotherapy in early-stage right breast cancer. SPRINGERPLUS 2016; 5:688. [PMID: 27350922 PMCID: PMC4899391 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2314-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2015] [Accepted: 05/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify a rational strategy for the selection of multi-beam IMRT in patients with right breast cancer through the comparison of dosimetric parameters of the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) using five different radiotherapy modalities. This was a retrospective study using computed tomography scans from ten patients with early-stage right breast cancer who had been treated previously. Three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), forward-planned IMRT (for-IMRT), inverse-planned IMRT (inv-IMRT), helical tomotherapy (HT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were planned for each patient. The plans were compared according to dose–volume histogram analysis. The most significant impact of inverse-planned multi-beam modalities for right breast cancer was the reduction of Dmax, Dmean, V53.5 and prescribed dose volume (cc) outside of the PTV (breast) (OB-V50) of the PTV. HT decreased the ipsilateral OAR volumes receiving higher doses. In exchange, HT also increased the volumes receiving low doses, which is known to lead to an increased rate of radiation-induced secondary malignancies. The heart, LAD, and contralateral doses for 3DCRT and for-IMRT were significantly lower than those for inv-IMRT, HT, and VMAT. In addition, inv-IMRT demonstrated an increase in exposed volume of heart, LAD, ipsilateral lung, and contralateral lung compared with those parameters for HT or VMAT. Although it is known to reduce cardiac toxicity with breath hold technique in left sided breast cancer, similarly it is possible for 3DCRT and for-IMRT techniques in right sided breast cancer even in free breathing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emel Haciislamoglu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Fatma Colak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Emine Canyilmaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Yasar Zengin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kanuni Research and Education Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Hakan Yilmaz
- Department of Nuclear Physics, Faculty of Science, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Adnan Yoney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Zumrut Bahat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hybrid intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique versus three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy with SIB for breast radiotherapy: a planning comparison. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2016. [DOI: 10.1017/s146039691600008x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AbstractAimThis study aims to compare conventional simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) planning technique with a hybrid SIB intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique with varying open tangent to IMRT field dose ratios. Furthermore, we investigated which of the dose ratios proves the most favourable as a class solution across a sample.MethodsIn total, 15 patients with conventional SIB treatment plans were re-planned with hybrid SIB IMRT technique using three differing open field:IMRT dose ratios, that is, 80:20, 70:30 and 60:40. Plans were compared using dosimetric comparison of organs at risk (OARs) and homogeneity and conformity indexes across target structures.ResultsAll hybrid plans reduced dose maximums and showed a reduction of high doses to both lungs but increased lower doses, that is, V5, with similar results discovered for the heart. Contralateral breast dose was shown to decrease V5 and V1 measures by hybrid arms, whereas increasing the V2. Left anterior descending artery dose and non-irradiated structures were reduced by all hybrid arms. The homogeneity and conformity increased across all hybrid arms. Qualitative assessment of all plans also favoured hybrid plans.FindingsHybrid plans produced superior dose conformity, homogeneity, reduced dose maximums and showed an improvement in most OAR parameters. The 70:30 hybrid technique exhibited greater benefits as a class solution to the sample than conventional plans due to superior dose conformity and homogeneity to target volumes.
Collapse
|
48
|
Radiation therapy for breast cancer: Literature review. Med Dosim 2016; 41:253-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2016.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2016] [Revised: 05/14/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
49
|
Yim J, Suttie C, Bromley R, Morgia M, Lamoury G. Intensity modulated radiotherapy and 3D conformal radiotherapy for whole breast irradiation: a comparative dosimetric study and introduction of a novel qualitative index for plan evaluation, the normal tissue index. J Med Radiat Sci 2015; 62:184-91. [PMID: 26451240 PMCID: PMC4592672 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2014] [Revised: 05/08/2015] [Accepted: 07/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We report on a retrospective dosimetric study, comparing 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and hybrid intensity modulated radiotherapy (hIMRT). We evaluated plans based on their planning target volume coverage, dose homogeneity, dose to organs at risk (OARs) and exposure of normal tissue to radiation. The Homogeneity Index (HI) was used to assess the dose homogeneity in the target region, and we describe a new index, the normal tissue index (NTI), to assess the dose in the normal tissue inside the tangent treatment portal. METHODS Plans were generated for 25 early-stage breast cancer patients, using a hIMRT technique. These were compared with the 3DCRT plans of the treatment previously received by the patients. Plan quality was evaluated using the HI, NTI and dose to OARs. RESULTS The hIMRT technique was significantly more homogenous than the 3DCRT technique, while maintaining target coverage. The hIMRT technique was also superior at minimising the amount of tissue receiving D 105% and above (P < 0.0001). The ipsilateral lung and contralateral breast maximum were significantly lower in the hIMRT plans (P < 0.05 and P < 0.005), but the 3DCRT technique achieved a lower mean heart dose in left-sided breast cancer patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Hybrid intensity modulated radiotherapy plans achieved improved dose homogeneity compared to the 3DCRT plans and superior outcome with regard to dose to normal tissues. We propose that the addition of both HI and NTI in evaluating the quality of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) breast plans provides clinically relevant comparators which more accurately reflect the new paradigm of treatment goals and outcomes in the era of breast IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackie Yim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Clare Suttie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Regina Bromley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marita Morgia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gillian Lamoury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Dundas KL, Pogson EM, Batumalai V, Boxer MM, Yap ML, Delaney GP, Metcalfe P, Holloway L. Australian survey on current practices for breast radiotherapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2015; 59:736-42. [PMID: 26269376 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2015] [Accepted: 06/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Detailed, published surveys specific to Australian breast radiotherapy practice were last conducted in 2002. More recent international surveys specific to breast radiotherapy practice include a European survey conducted in 2008/2009 and a Spanish survey conducted in 2009. Radiotherapy techniques continue to evolve, and the utilisation of new techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), is increasing. This survey aimed to determine current breast radiotherapy practices across Australia. METHOD An online survey was completed by 50 of the 69 Australian radiation therapy treatment centres. RESULTS Supine tangential beam whole breast irradiation remains the standard of care for breast radiotherapy in Australia. A growing number of institutions are exploring prone positioning and IMRT utilisation. This survey demonstrated a wide variation in the benchmarks used to limit and report organ at risk doses, prescribed dose regimen, and post-mastectomy bolus practices. This survey also indicated, when compared with international literature, that there may be less interest in or uptake of external beam partial breast irradiation, prone positioning, simultaneous integrated boost and breath hold techniques. These are areas where further review and research may be warranted to ensure Australian patients are receiving the best care possible based on the best evidence available. CONCLUSION This survey provides insight into the current radiotherapy practice for breast cancer in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kylie L Dundas
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elise M Pogson
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vikneswary Batumalai
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Miriam M Boxer
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mei Ling Yap
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Geoff P Delaney
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter Metcalfe
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lois Holloway
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|