1
|
Yamano A, Inoue T, Yagihashi T, Yamanaka M, Matsumoto K, Shimo T, Shirata R, Nitta K, Nagata H, Shiraishi S, Minagawa Y, Omura M, Tokuuye K, Chang W. Impact of interplay effects on spot scanning proton therapy with motion mitigation techniques for lung cancer: SFUD versus robustly optimized IMPT plans utilizing a four-dimensional dynamic dose simulation tool. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:117. [PMID: 39252032 PMCID: PMC11385833 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02518-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The interaction between breathing motion and scanning beams causes interplay effects in spot-scanning proton therapy for lung cancer, resulting in compromised treatment quality. This study investigated the effects and clinical robustness of two types of spot-scanning proton therapy with motion-mitigation techniques for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using a new simulation tool (4DCT-based dose reconstruction). METHODS Three-field single-field uniform dose (SFUD) and robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans combined with gating and re-scanning techniques were created using a VQA treatment planning system for 15 patients with locally advanced NSCLC (70 GyRBE/35 fractions). In addition, gating windows of three or five phases around the end-of-expiration phase and two internal gross tumor volumes (iGTVs) were created, and a re-scanning number of four was used. First, the static dose (SD) was calculated using the end-of-expiration computed tomography (CT) images. The four-dimensional dynamic dose (4DDD) was then calculated using the SD plans, 4D-CT images, and the deformable image registration technique on end-of-expiration CT. The target coverage (V98%, V100%), homogeneity index (HI), and conformation number (CN) for the iGTVs and organ-at-risk (OAR) doses were calculated for the SD and 4DDD groups and statistically compared between the SD, 4DDD, SFUD, and IMPT treatment plans using paired t-test. RESULTS In the 3- and 5-phase SFUD, statistically significant differences between the SD and 4DDD groups were observed for V100%, HI, and CN. In addition, statistically significant differences were observed for V98%, V100%, and HI in phases 3 and 5 of IMPT. The mean V98% and V100% in both 3-phase plans were within clinical limits (> 95%) when interplay effects were considered; however, V100% decreased to 89.3% and 94.0% for the 5-phase SFUD and IMPT, respectively. Regarding the significant differences in the deterioration rates of the dose volume histogram (DVH) indices, the 3-phase SFUD plans had lower V98% and CN values and higher V100% values than the IMPT plans. In the 5-phase plans, SFUD had higher deterioration rates for V100% and HI than IMPT. CONCLUSIONS Interplay effects minimally impacted target coverage and OAR doses in SFUD and robustly optimized IMPT with 3-phase gating and re-scanning for locally advanced NSCLC. However, target coverage significantly declined with an increased gating window. Robustly optimized IMPT showed superior resilience to interplay effects, ensuring better target coverage, prescription dose adherence, and homogeneity than SFUD. TRIAL REGISTRATION None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiro Yamano
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan
- Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 7-2-10 Higashiogu, Arakawa, Tokyo, 116-8551, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Inoue
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
| | - Takayuki Yagihashi
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan
- Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 7-2-10 Higashiogu, Arakawa, Tokyo, 116-8551, Japan
| | - Masashi Yamanaka
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan
- Medical Physics Laboratory, Division of Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 1-7, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Kazuki Matsumoto
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan
- Doctoral Program in Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8577, Japan
| | - Takahiro Shimo
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Shirata
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan
| | - Kazunori Nitta
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan
| | - Hironori Nagata
- Department of Medical Physics, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan
| | - Sachika Shiraishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan
| | - Yumiko Minagawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan
| | - Motoko Omura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan
| | - Koichi Tokuuye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-8533, Japan
| | - Weishan Chang
- Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 7-2-10 Higashiogu, Arakawa, Tokyo, 116-8551, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu Y, Liu P, Gao XS, Wang Z, Lyu F, Shi A, Wang W, Gao Y, Liao A, Zhao J, Ding X. Dosimetric comparison of IMPT vs VMAT for multiple lung lesions: an NTCP model-based decision-making strategy. Med Dosim 2024:S0958-3947(24)00029-3. [PMID: 39013723 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2024.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Revised: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
To compare the dosimetric differences in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of multiple lung lesions and determine a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model-based decision strategy that determines which treatment modality the patient will use. A total of 41 patients were retrospectively selected for this study. The number of patients with 1-6 lesions was 5, 16, 7, 6, 3, and 4, respectively. A prescription dose of 70 GyRBE in 10 fractions was given to each lesion. SBRT plans were generated using VMAT and IMPT. All the IMPT plans used robustness optimization with ± 3.5% range uncertainties and 5 mm setup uncertainties. Dosimetric metrics and the predicted NTCP value of radiation pneumonitis (RP), esophagitis, and pericarditis were analyzed to evaluate the potential clinical benefits between different planning groups. In addition, a threshold for the ratio of PTV to lungs (%) to determine whether a patient would benefit highly from IMPT was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. All plans reached target coverage (V70GyRBE ≥ 95%). Compared with VMAT, IMPT resulted in a significantly lower dose of most thoracic normal tissues. For the 1-2, 3-4 and 5-6 lesion groups, the lung V5 was 29.90 ± 9.44%, 58.33 ± 13.35%, and 81.02 ± 5.91% for VMAT and 11.34 ± 3.11% (p < 0.001), 21.45 ± 3.80% (p < 0.001), and 32.48 ± 4.90% (p < 0.001) for IMPT, respectively. The lung V20 was 12.07 ± 4.94%, 25.57 ± 6.54%, and 43.99 ± 11.83% for VMAT and 6.76 ± 1.80% (p < 0.001), 13.14 ± 2.27% (p < 0.01), and 19.62 ± 3.48% (p < 0.01) for IMPT. The Dmean of the total lung was 7.65 ± 2.47 GyRBE, 14.78 ± 2.75 GyRBE, and 21.64 ± 4.07 GyRBE for VMAT and 3.69 ± 1.04 GyRBE (p < 0.001), 7.13 ± 1.41 GyRBE (p < 0.001), and 10.69 ± 1.81 GyRBE (p < 0.001) for IMPT. Additionally, in the VMAT group, the maximum NTCP value of radiation pneumonitis was 73.91%, whereas it was significantly lower in the IMPT group at 10.73%. The accuracy of our NTCP model-based decision model, which combines the number of lesions and PTV/Lungs (%), was 97.6%. The study demonstrated that the IMPT SBRT for multiple lung lesions had satisfactory dosimetry results, even when the number of lesions reached 6. The NTCP model-based decision strategy presented in our study could serve as an effective tool in clinical practice, aiding in the selection of the optimal treatment modality between VMAT and IMPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Peilin Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont University hospital, Corewell Health, Detroit, 48073, USA
| | - Xian-Shu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
| | - Zishen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hebei Yizhou Cancer Hospital, Baoding, 072750, China
| | - Feng Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Anhui Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Weihu Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yan Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Anyan Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing United Family Medical Center, Beijing, 100015, China
| | - Jing Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing United Family Medical Center, Beijing, 100015, China
| | - Xuanfeng Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont University hospital, Corewell Health, Detroit, 48073, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bruno DS, Mitchell C, Dowlati A, Shamp S, Fu P, Rindeau J, Zheng Y, Machtay M, Biswas T. A Pilot Trial of Proton-Based Cardiac Sparing Accelerated Fractionated Radiation Therapy in Unresectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Extended Durvalumab Therapy (PARTICLE-D). Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00150-4. [PMID: 39002856 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Concurrent chemoradiation therapy is the current nonsurgical standard of care for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, this is a difficult regimen to tolerate, especially for those who are elderly, have multiple comorbidities, or have poor performance status. Alternative treatment regimens are needed for this vulnerable population. We report initial results of concurrent durvalumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, and hypofractionated, dose-escalating, proton external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS This phase 1, pilot dose escalation trial enrolled 7 patients with newly diagnosed stage IIIA to IIIC non-small cell lung cancer and who were unable or unwilling to undergo concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Patients previously treated with immunotherapy were excluded. Five patients in this 3 + 3 study design received a fixed dose of durvalumab on day 1 of each 28-day cycle plus hypofractionated proton EBRT with initial dose of 60 Gy (Arm 1) in 20 fractions while 2 patients received the escalation dose of 69 Gy in 23 fractions (Arm 2). The primary objective was to assess safety and the secondary objective was to assess feasibility and adverse events. RESULTS All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events, primarily grades 1 and 2. Pneumonitis and anemia were the most common. Only 1 dose-limiting toxicity occurred in arm 1, which was a grade 3 pneumonitis leading to grade 5 pneumonia. Additionally, 2 delayed-onset grade 5 tracheal necrosis events occurred >13 months after treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS Concurrent durvalumab plus hypofractionated proton EBRT was well tolerated in the short term. However, 3 treatment-related deaths, including 2 delayed-onset grade 5 tracheal necroses negatively impacted overall safety. A dose de-escalation protocol of proton-based radiation therapy plus durvalumab is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debora S Bruno
- Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Carley Mitchell
- Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Afshin Dowlati
- Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Stephen Shamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Pingfu Fu
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John Rindeau
- Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Yiran Zheng
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mitchell Machtay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Tithi Biswas
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Radiation Oncology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morel D, Robert C, Paragios N, Grégoire V, Deutsch E. Translational Frontiers and Clinical Opportunities of Immunologically Fitted Radiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:2317-2332. [PMID: 38477824 PMCID: PMC11145173 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-3632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
Ionizing radiation can have a wide range of impacts on tumor-immune interactions, which are being studied with the greatest interest and at an accelerating pace by the medical community. Despite its undeniable immunostimulatory potential, it clearly appears that radiotherapy as it is prescribed and delivered nowadays often alters the host's immunity toward a suboptimal state. This may impair the full recovery of a sustained and efficient antitumor immunosurveillance posttreatment. An emerging concept is arising from this awareness and consists of reconsidering the way of designing radiation treatment planning, notably by taking into account the individualized risks of deleterious radio-induced immune alteration that can be deciphered from the planned beam trajectory through lymphocyte-rich organs. In this review, we critically appraise key aspects to consider while planning immunologically fitted radiotherapy, including the challenges linked to the identification of new dose constraints to immune-rich structures. We also discuss how pharmacologic immunomodulation could be advantageously used in combination with radiotherapy to compensate for the radio-induced loss, for example, with (i) agonists of interleukin (IL)2, IL4, IL7, IL9, IL15, or IL21, similarly to G-CSF being used for the prophylaxis of severe chemo-induced neutropenia, or with (ii) myeloid-derived suppressive cell blockers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphné Morel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, Villejuif, France
| | - Charlotte Robert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, Villejuif, France
- Paris-Saclay University, School of Medicine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Nikos Paragios
- Therapanacea, Paris, France
- CentraleSupélec, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Vincent Grégoire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, Villejuif, France
- Paris-Saclay University, School of Medicine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chao PJ, Chang CH, Wu JJ, Liu YH, Shiau J, Shih HH, Lin GZ, Lee SH, Lee TF. Improving Prediction of Complications Post-Proton Therapy in Lung Cancer Using Large Language Models and Meta-Analysis. Cancer Control 2024; 31:10732748241286749. [PMID: 39307562 PMCID: PMC11418344 DOI: 10.1177/10732748241286749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study enhances the efficiency of predicting complications in lung cancer patients receiving proton therapy by utilizing large language models (LLMs) and meta-analytical techniques for literature quality assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS We integrated systematic reviews with LLM evaluations, sourcing studies from Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus, managed via EndNote X20. Inclusion and exclusion criteria ensured literature relevance. Techniques included meta-analysis, heterogeneity assessment using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics, and subgroup analyses for different complications. Quality and bias risk were assessed using the PROBAST tool and further analyzed with models such as ChatGPT-4, Llama2-13b, and Llama3-8b. Evaluation metrics included AUC, accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and time efficiency (WPM). RESULTS The meta-analysis revealed an overall effect size of 0.78 for model predictions, with high heterogeneity observed (I2 = 72.88%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis for radiation-induced esophagitis and pneumonitis revealed predictive effect sizes of 0.79 and 0.77, respectively, with a heterogeneity index (I2) of 0%, indicating that there were no significant differences among the models in predicting these specific complications. A literature assessment using LLMs demonstrated that ChatGPT-4 achieved the highest accuracy at 90%, significantly outperforming the Llama3 and Llama2 models, which had accuracies ranging from 44% to 62%. Additionally, LLM evaluations were conducted 3229 times faster than manual assessments were, markedly enhancing both efficiency and accuracy. The risk assessment results identified nine studies as high risk, three as low risk, and one as unknown, confirming the robustness of the ChatGPT-4 across various evaluation metrics. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that the integration of large language models with meta-analysis techniques can significantly increase the efficiency of literature evaluations and reduce the time required for assessments, confirming that there are no significant differences among models in predicting post proton therapy complications in lung cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Ju Chao
- Medical Physics and Informatics Laboratory of Electronics Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chu-Ho Chang
- Medical Physics and Informatics Laboratory of Electronics Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jyun-Jie Wu
- Medical Physics and Informatics Laboratory of Electronics Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Hsien Liu
- Medical Physics and Informatics Laboratory of Electronics Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Junping Shiau
- Medical Physics and Informatics Laboratory of Electronics Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Hung Shih
- Medical Physics and Informatics Laboratory of Electronics Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Guang-Zhi Lin
- Medical Physics and Informatics Laboratory of Electronics Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Shen-Hao Lee
- Medical Physics and Informatics Laboratory of Electronics Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, Taiwan
| | - Tsair-Fwu Lee
- Medical Physics and Informatics Laboratory of Electronics Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- School of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Seo SH, Pyo H, Ahn YC, Oh D, Yang K, Kim N, Sun JM, Park S, Jung HA, Lee SH, Ahn JS, Ahn MJ, Noh JM. Pulmonary function and toxicities of proton versus photon for limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Radiat Oncol J 2023; 41:274-282. [PMID: 38185932 PMCID: PMC10772597 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2023.00773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to compare the oncological outcomes and toxicities of definitive proton beam therapy (PBT) and photon beam therapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 262 patients with newly diagnosed LS-SCLC who underwent definitive PBT (n = 20; proton group) or photon beam therapy (n = 242; photon group) with concurrent chemotherapy between January 2016 and February 2021 and compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), dose-volume parameters, and toxicities between the groups. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 24.5 months (range, 3.7 to 78.7). Baseline lung function was significantly worse and clinical target volume (CTV) was larger in the proton group (CTV: 296.6 vs. 215.3 mL; p = 0.080). The mean lung V10 was 37.7% ± 16.8% and 51.6% ± 24.5% in the proton and photon groups, respectively (p = 0.002). Two-year OS and PFS rates were 57.2% and 35.7% in the proton group and 65.3% and 40.8% in the photon group, respectively (p = 0.542 and 0.748, respectively). Grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis occurred in 5 (25.0%) and 7 (35.0%) PBT-treated patients and 66 (27.3%) and 40 (16.5%) photon beam therapy-treated patients, respectively (p = 0.826 and 0.062, respectively). CONCLUSION Although the proton group had poorer lung function and a larger CTV than that in the photon group, both groups exhibited comparable treatment outcomes and radiation-related toxicities in LS-SCLC. PBT may be a valuable therapeutic modality in patients with poor pulmonary function or extensive disease burden owing to its lung-sparing ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Hoon Seo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hongryull Pyo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Chan Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dongryul Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyungmi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nalee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Mu Sun
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sehhoon Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Ae Jung
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Se-Hoon Lee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Seok Ahn
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myung-Ju Ahn
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Myoung Noh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen Y, Luo H, Liu R, Tan M, Wang Q, Wu X, Du T, Liu Z, Sun S, Zhang Q, Wang X. Efficacy and safety of particle therapy for inoperable stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:86. [PMID: 37217970 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02264-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Particle therapy, mainly including carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT), has dose distribution advantages compared to photon radiotherapy. It has been widely reported as a promising treatment method for early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its application in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is relatively rare, and its efficacy and safety are inconclusive. This study aimed to provide systematic evidence for evaluating the efficacy and safety of particle therapy for inoperable LA-NSCLC. METHODS To retrieve published literature, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library until September 4, 2022. The primary endpoints were local control (LC) rate, overall survival (OS) rate, and progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 2 and 5 years. The secondary endpoint was treatment-related toxicity. The pooled clinical outcomes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using STATA 15.1. RESULTS Nineteen eligible studies with a total sample size of 851 patients were included. The pooled data demonstrated that the OS, PFS, and LC rates at 2 years of LA-NSCLC treated by particle therapy were 61.3% (95% CI = 54.7-68.7%), 37.9% (95% CI = 33.8-42.6%) and 82.2% (95% CI = 78.7-85.9%), respectively. The pooled 5-year OS, PFS, and LC rates were 41.3% (95% CI = 27.1-63.1%), 25.3% (95% CI = 16.3-39.4%), and 61.5% (95% CI = 50.7-74.6%), respectively. Subgroup analysis stratified by treatment type showed that the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT, PBT combined with concurrent chemotherapy) group had better survival benefits than the PBT and CIRT groups. The incidence rates of grade 3/4 esophagitis, dermatitis, and pneumonia in LA-NSCLC patients after particle therapy were 2.6% (95% CI = 0.4-6.0%), 2.6% (95% CI = 0.5-5.7%) and 3.4% (95% CI = 1.4-6.0%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Particle therapy demonstrated promising efficacy and acceptable toxicity in LA-NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanliang Chen
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hongtao Luo
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China
- Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ruifeng Liu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China
- Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Mingyu Tan
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qian Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xun Wu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Tianqi Du
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Zhiqiang Liu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China
- Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Shilong Sun
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China
- Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
- Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qiuning Zhang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China.
- Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
- Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| | - Xiaohu Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu Province, China.
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
- Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
- Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Andruska N, Schlaak RA, Frei A, Schottstaedt AM, Lin CY, Fish BL, Gasperetti T, Mpoy C, Pipke JL, Pedersen LN, Flister MJ, Javaheri A, Bergom C. Differences in radiation-induced heart dysfunction in male versus female rats. Int J Radiat Biol 2023; 99:1096-1108. [PMID: 36971580 PMCID: PMC10431914 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2023.2194404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation therapy remains part of the standard of care for breast, lung, and esophageal cancers. While radiotherapy improves local control and survival, radiation-induced heart dysfunction is a common side effect of thoracic radiotherapy. Cardiovascular dysfunction can also result from non-therapeutic total body radiation exposures. Numerous studies have evaluated the relationship between radiation dose to the heart and cardiotoxicity, but relatively little is known about whether there are differences based on biological sex in radiation-induced heart dysfunction (RIHD). MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated whether male and female inbred Dahl SS rats display differences in RIHD following delivery of 24 Gy in a single fraction to the whole heart using a 1.5 cm beam size (collimater). We also compared the 2.0 cm vs. 1.5 cm collimator in males. Pleural and pericardial effusions and normalized heart weights were measured, and echocardiograms were performed. RESULTS Female SS rats displayed more severe RIHD relative to age-matched SS male rats. Normalized heart weight was significantly increased in females, but not in males. A total of 94% (15/16) of males and 55% (6/11) of females survived 5 months after completion of radiotherapy (p < .01). Among surviving rats, 100% of females and 14% of males developed moderate-to-severe pericardial effusions at 5 months. Females demonstrated increased pleural effusions, with the mean normalized pleural fluid volume for females and males being 56.6 mL/kg ± 12.1 and 10.96 mL/kg ± 6.4 in males (p = .001), respectively. Echocardiogram findings showed evidence of heart failure, which was more pronounced in females. Because age-matched female rats have smaller lungs, a higher percentage of the total lung was treated with radiation in females than males using the same beam size. After using a larger 2 cm beam in males which results in higher lung exposure, there was not a significant difference between males and females in terms of the development of moderate-to-severe pericardial effusions or pleural effusions. Treatment of males with a 2 cm beam resulted in comparable increases in LV mass and reductions in stroke volume to female rats treated with a 1.5 cm beam. CONCLUSION Together, these results illustrate that there are differences in radiation-induced cardiotoxicity between male and female SS rats and add to the data that lung radiation doses, in addition to other factors, may play an important role in cardiac dysfunction following heart radiation exposure. These factors may be important to factor into future mitigation studies of radiation-induced cardiotoxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal Andruska
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Rachel A. Schlaak
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Anne Frei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - Chieh-Yu Lin
- Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Brian L. Fish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Tracy Gasperetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Cedric Mpoy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jamie L. Pipke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Lauren N. Pedersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Michael J. Flister
- Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Ali Javaheri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Carmen Bergom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yu NY, DeWees TA, Voss MM, Breen WG, Chiang JS, Ding JX, Daniels TB, Owen D, Olivier KR, Garces YI, Park SS, Sarkaria JN, Yang P, Savvides PS, Ernani V, Liu W, Schild SE, Merrell KW, Sio TT. Cardiopulmonary Toxicity Following Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2022; 23:e526-e535. [PMID: 36104272 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2022.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) has the potential to reduce radiation dose to normal organs when compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). We hypothesized that IMPT is associated with a reduced rate of cardiopulmonary toxicities in patients with Stage III NSCLC when compared with IMRT. METHODS We analyzed 163 consecutively treated patients with biopsy-proven, stage III NSCLC who received IMPT (n = 35, 21%) or IMRT (n = 128, 79%). Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were analyzed. Overall survival (OS), freedom-from distant metastasis (FFDM), freedom-from locoregional relapse (FFLR), and cardiopulmonary toxicities (CTCAE v5.0) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate. Univariate cox regressions were conducted for the final model. RESULTS Median follow-up of surviving patients was 25.5 (range, 4.6-58.1) months. Median RT dose was 60 (range, 45-72) Gy [RBE]. OS, FFDM, and FFLR were not different based on RT modality. IMPT provided significant dosimetric pulmonary and cardiac sparing when compared to IMRT. IMPT was associated with a reduced rate of grade more than or equal to 3 pneumonitis (HR 0.25, P = .04) and grade more than or equal to 3 cardiac events (HR 0.33, P = .08). Pre-treatment predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide less than equal to 57% (HR 2.8, P = .04) and forced expiratory volume in the first second less than equal to 61% (HR 3.1, P = .03) were associated with an increased rate of grade more than or equal to 3 pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS IMPT is associated with a reduced risk of clinically significant pneumonitis and cardiac events when compared with IMRT without compromising tumor control in stage III NSCLC. IMPT may provide a safer treatment option, particularly for high-risk patients with poor pretreatment pulmonary function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Molly M Voss
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Julia X Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Thomas B Daniels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ping Yang
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | | | - Vinicius Ernani
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | | | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Carrasquilla M, Paudel N, Collins BT, Anderson E, Krochmal R, Margolis M, Balawi A, DeBlois D, Giaccone G, Kim C, Liu S, Lischalk JW. High-Risk Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Active Scanning Proton Beam Radiation Therapy and Immunotherapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101125. [PMID: 36578277 PMCID: PMC9791120 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a deadly malignancy that is frequently diagnosed in patients with significant medical comorbidities. When delivering local and regional therapy, an exceedingly narrow therapeutic window is encountered, which often precludes patients from receiving aggressive curative therapy. Radiation therapy advances including particle therapy have been employed in an effort to expand this therapeutic window. Here we report outcomes with the use of proton therapy with curative intent and immunotherapy to treat patients diagnosed with high-risk NSCLC. Methods and Materials Patients were determined to be high risk if they had severe underlying cardiopulmonary dysfunction, history of prior thoracic radiation therapy, and/or large volume or unfavorable location of disease (eg, bilateral hilar involvement, supraclavicular involvement). As such, patients were determined to be ineligible for conventional x-ray-based radiation therapy and were treated with pencil beam scanning proton beam therapy (PBS-PBT). Patients who demonstrated excess respiratory motion (ie, greater than 1 cm in any dimension noted on the 4-dimensional computed tomography simulation scan) were deemed to be ineligible for PBT. Toxicity was reported using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. Overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results A total of 29 patients with high-risk NSCLC diagnoses were treated with PBS-PBT. The majority (55%) of patients were defined as high risk due to severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction. Most commonly, patients were treated definitively to a total dose of 6000 cGy (relative biological effectiveness) in 30 fractions with concurrent chemotherapy. Overall, there were a total of 6 acute grade 3 toxicities observed in our cohort. Acute high-grade toxicities included esophagitis (n = 4, 14%), dyspnea (n = 1, 3.5%), and cough (n = 1, 3.5%). No patients developed grade 4 or higher toxicity. The majority of patients went on to receive immunotherapy, and high-grade pneumonitis was rare. Two-year progression-free and overall survival was estimated to be 51% and 67%, respectively. COVID-19 was confirmed or suspected to be responsible for 2 patient deaths during the follow-up period. Conclusions Radical PBS-PBT treatment delivered in a cohort of patients with high-risk lung cancer with immunotherapy is feasible with careful multidisciplinary evaluation and rigorous follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Carrasquilla
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Nitika Paudel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Brian T. Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Eric Anderson
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Rebecca Krochmal
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Marc Margolis
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Ahssan Balawi
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - David DeBlois
- Department of Radiation Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Giuseppe Giaccone
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Chul Kim
- Lombardi Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Stephen Liu
- Lombardi Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Jonathan W. Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital – Long Island, New York, New York,Corresponding author: Jonathan W. Lischalk, MD
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Volpe S, Piperno G, Colombo F, Biffi A, Comi S, Mastroleo F, Maria Camarda A, Casbarra A, Cattani F, Corrao G, de Marinis F, Spaggiari L, Guckenberger M, Orecchia R, Alterio D, Alicja Jereczek-Fossa B. Hypofractionated proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Ready for prime time? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 110:102464. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
12
|
A deep LSTM autoencoder-based framework for predictive maintenance of proton radiotherapy delivery system. Artif Intell Med 2022; 132:102387. [DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
13
|
Liu R, Zhao X, Medrano M. Experimental validation of proton physics models of Geant4 for calculating stopping power ratio. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2022; 42:10.1088/1361-6498/ac7918. [PMID: 35705062 PMCID: PMC9462414 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac7918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
In this work, we conducted experiments to validate the proton physics models of Geant4 (version 10.6). The stopping power ratios (SPRs) of 11 inserts, such as acrylic, delrin, high density polyethylene, and polytetrafluoroethylene, etc, were measured using a superconducting synchrocyclotron that produces a scattering proton beam. The SPRs of the inserts were also calculated based on Geant4 simulation with six physics lists, i.e. QGSP_ FTFP_ BERT, QGSP_BIC_HP, QGSP_BIC, QGSP_FTFP_BERT, QSGP_BERT, and QBBC. The calculated SPRs were compared to the experimental SPRs, and relative per cent error was used to quantify the accuracy of the simulated SPRs of inserts. The comparison showed that the five physics lists generally agree well with the experimental SPRs with a relative difference of less than 1%. The lowest overall percentage error was observed for QGSP_FTFP_BERT and the highest overall percentage error was observed for QGSP_BIC_HP. The 0.1 mm range cut value consistently led to higher percentage error for all physics lists except for QGSP_BIC_HP and QBBC. Based on the validation, we recommend QGSP_BERT_HP physics list for proton dose calculation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruirui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Xiandong Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Maria Medrano
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Orukari I, Perkins S, Zhao T, Huang J, Caruthers DF, Duriseti S. Brainstem Toxicity in Pediatric Patients Treated with Protons Using a Single-vault Synchrocyclotron System. Int J Part Ther 2022; 9:12-17. [PMID: 35774490 PMCID: PMC9238130 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-22-00008.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Cranial radiation therapy remains an integral component of curative treatment for pediatric patients with brain tumors. Proton beam radiation therapy (PBT) can limit collateral radiation dose to surrounding normal tissue, thus reducing off-target exposure while maintaining appropriate tumor coverage. While PBT offers significant advantages over photon therapy for pediatric patients with intracranial malignancies, cases of brainstem necrosis after PBT have raised concerns that PBT may pose an increased risk of necrosis over photon therapy. We investigated the incidence of brainstem necrosis at our institution in children treated with PBT for intracranial malignancies. Patients and Methods Patients with pediatric brain tumor treated with passively scattered PBT, using a gantry-mounted, synchrocyclotron single-vault system between 2013 and 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria included patients 21 years of age or younger who received a minimum 0.1 cm3 maximum brainstem dose of 50 Gray relative biological effectiveness (GyRBE). Patients were assessed for “central nervous system necrosis” in the brainstem per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0 (US National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland) criteria. Results Fifty-eight patients were included for analysis. The median age was 10.3 years. Twenty-one (36.2%) patients received craniospinal irradiation. Thirty-four (58.6%) patients received chemotherapy. The median prescription radiation dose was 54 GyRBE. Regarding published dosimetric constraints used at 3 separate proton centers, the goal brainstem D50% <52 GyRBE was exceeded in 23 (40%) patients, but the brainstem Dmax <58 GyRBE was not exceeded in any patients. No patient experienced grade ≥2 brainstem injury. One patient demonstrated radiographic changes consistent with grade 1 toxicity. This patient had myeloablative chemotherapy with tandem stem cell rescue before PBT. Conclusion Our data demonstrates a low risk of any brainstem injury in children treated with passively scattered PBT using a single-vault synchrocyclotron.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inema Orukari
- 1 Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Stephanie Perkins
- 1 Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Tianyu Zhao
- 1 Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jiayi Huang
- 1 Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Douglas F. Caruthers
- 1 Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Sai Duriseti
- 1 Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes Jewish Healthcare, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hoppe BS, Nichols RC, Flampouri S, Pankuch M, Morris CG, Pham DC, Mohindra P, Hartsell WF, Mohammed N, Chon BH, Kestin LL, Simone CB. Chemoradiation with Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Stage II-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A YYY Phase 1/2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:732-741. [PMID: 35306151 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hypofractionated radiotherapy has been safely implemented into the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but not locally advanced (LA-) NSCLC due to prohibitive toxicities with photon therapy. Proton therapy, however, may allow for safe delivery of hypofractionated radiotherapy. We sought to determine whether hypofractionated proton therapy with concurrent chemotherapy improves overall survival. METHODS & MATERIALS The YYY conducted a phase 1/2 single-arm nonrandomized prospective multicenter trial from 2013 through 2018. Thirty-two patients were consented; 28 were eligible for on-study treatment. Patients had AJCCv7 stage II or III unresectable NSCLC and received hypofractionated proton therapy at 2.5-4 Gy per fraction to a total 60 Gy with concurrent platin-based doublet chemotherapy. The primary outcome was 1-year overall survival comparable to that reported for RTOG 9410 of 62%. RESULTS The trial closed early due to slow accrual, in part, from a competing trial, NRG 1308. Median patient age was 70 (range, 50-86) years. Patients were predominantly male (N=20), white (N=23), and prior smokers (N=27). Most had stage III NSCLC (N=22), 50% of whom had adenocarcinoma. After a median follow-up of 31 months, the 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 89% and 49%, and progression-free survival rates were 58% and 32%, respectively. No acute grade 3 or higher esophagitis occurred. Only 14% developed a grade 3 or higher radiation-related pulmonary toxicity. CONCLUSION Hypofractionated proton therapy delivered at 2.5-3.53 Gy per fraction to a total 60 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy provides promising survival and additional examination through larger studies may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
| | - Romaine C Nichols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mark Pankuch
- Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Dat C Pham
- Baptist MD Anderson Cancer Center, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | - Brian H Chon
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - Larry L Kestin
- MHP Radiation Oncology Institute/GenesisCare USA, Farmington Hills, Michigan
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pakela JM, Knopf A, Dong L, Rucinski A, Zou W. Management of Motion and Anatomical Variations in Charged Particle Therapy: Past, Present, and Into the Future. Front Oncol 2022; 12:806153. [PMID: 35356213 PMCID: PMC8959592 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.806153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The major aim of radiation therapy is to provide curative or palliative treatment to cancerous malignancies while minimizing damage to healthy tissues. Charged particle radiotherapy utilizing carbon ions or protons is uniquely suited for this task due to its ability to achieve highly conformal dose distributions around the tumor volume. For these treatment modalities, uncertainties in the localization of patient anatomy due to inter- and intra-fractional motion present a heightened risk of undesired dose delivery. A diverse range of mitigation strategies have been developed and clinically implemented in various disease sites to monitor and correct for patient motion, but much work remains. This review provides an overview of current clinical practices for inter and intra-fractional motion management in charged particle therapy, including motion control, current imaging and motion tracking modalities, as well as treatment planning and delivery techniques. We also cover progress to date on emerging technologies including particle-based radiography imaging, novel treatment delivery methods such as tumor tracking and FLASH, and artificial intelligence and discuss their potential impact towards improving or increasing the challenge of motion mitigation in charged particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia M. Pakela
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Antje Knopf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Antoni Rucinski
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Substantial Sparing of Organs at Risk with Modern Proton Therapy in Lung Cancer, but Altered Breathing Patterns Can Jeopardize Target Coverage. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061365. [PMID: 35326516 PMCID: PMC8945974 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is a fine balance between toxicity and cure. Modern proton therapy might offer a more gentle radiation treatment compared to state-of-the-art photon radiotherapy, but is also more susceptible to the influence of breathing motion and anatomical changes. In this study, the influence of such uncertainties on treatment delivery was thoroughly investigated. Modern proton therapy did indeed show potential to reduce the risk of toxicity for the heart and lungs. This potential was maintained under the influence of anatomical and delivery uncertainties. However, changes in breathing motion jeopardized the target dose distribution in a subset of patients. We therefore recommend imaging at onset or early in treatment to recognize these patients and adapt the treatment. Abstract Enhancing treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) by using pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT) is attractive, but little knowledge exists on the effects of uncertainties occurring between the planning (Plan) and the start of treatment (Start). In this prospective simulation study, we investigated the clinical potential for PBS-PT under the influence of such uncertainties. Imaging with 4DCT at Plan and Start was carried out for 15 patients that received state-of-the-art intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Three PBS-PT plans were created per patient: 3D robust single-field uniform dose (SFUD), 3D robust intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), and 4D robust IMPT (4DIMPT). These were exposed to setup and range uncertainties and breathing motion at Plan, and changes in breathing motion and anatomy at Start. Target coverage and dose-volume parameters relevant for toxicity were compared. The organ at risk sparing at Plan was greatest with IMPT, followed by 4DIMPT, SFUD and IMRT, and persisted at Start. All plans met the preset criteria for target robustness at Plan. At Start, three patients had a lack of CTV coverage with PBS-PT. In conclusion, the clinical potential for heart and lung toxicity reduction with PBS-PT was substantial and persistent. Altered breathing patterns between Plan and Start jeopardized target coverage for all PBS-PT techniques.
Collapse
|
18
|
Jongen A, Charlier F, Baker K, Chang J, Hartsell W, Laramore G, Mohindra P, Moretti L, Redman M, Rosen L, Tsai H, Van Gestel D, Vargas C, Rengan R. Clinical Outcomes After Proton Beam Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis of a Multi-institutional Prospective Registry. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100767. [PMID: 35071826 PMCID: PMC8767257 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose For most disease sites, level 1 evidence is lacking for proton beam therapy (PBT). By identifying target populations that would benefit most from PBT, prospective registries could overcome many of the challenges in clinical trial enrollment. Herein, we report clinical outcomes of patients treated with PBT for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Methods and Materials Data were obtained from the multi-institutional prospective database of the Proton Collaborative Group (PCG). Inclusion criteria of our study were stage III de novo or recurrent LA-NSCLC, use of PBT, and availability of follow-up data. Overall survival (OS) time was calculated from the start of treatment until death or last follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for groups of interest and compared with log-rank tests. Cox regression modeling was used to evaluate the multivariate association between selected covariates and OS. Results A total of 195 patients were included in the analysis. PBT was given with a median equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) of 63.8 Gy (relative biological effectiveness). Pencil beam scanning was used in 20% of treatments. Treatment-related grade 3 adverse events were rare: 1 pneumonitis, 2 dermatitis, and 3 esophagitis. No grade 4 events were reported. Two cardiac-related grade 5 events occurred in patients with multiple risk factors. The median follow-up time for living patients was 37.1 months and the median OS was 19.0 months. On multivariate analysis, good performance status (hazard ratio, 0.27; [95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.46]; P < .0001), pencil beam scanning use (0.55; [0.31-0.97]; P = .04), and increased EQD2 (0.80; [0.71-0.90] - per 10 Gy increase; P = .0002) were associated with decreased mortality. Conclusions PBT appears to yield low rates of adverse events with an OS similar to other retrospective studies on PBT for LA-NSCLC. PBS use and increased EQD2 can potentially improve OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélien Jongen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zürich University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Florian Charlier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kelsey Baker
- Clinical Statistics, Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - John Chang
- Oklahoma Proton Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - William Hartsell
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois
| | - George Laramore
- University of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- University of Maryland School of Medicine and Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Luigi Moretti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mary Redman
- Clinical Statistics, Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lane Rosen
- Willis-Knighton Medical Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Henry Tsai
- New Jersey Procure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - Dirk Van Gestel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Carlos Vargas
- Mayo Clinic Arizona Proton Therapy Program, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ramesh Rengan
- University of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy and Arc Therapy: Proof of Concept of a Winning Alliance. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010116. [PMID: 35008280 PMCID: PMC8749801 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Normal tissue’s morbidity continues to limit the increase in the therapeutic index in radiation therapy. This study explores the potential advantages of combining proton arc therapy and proton minibeam radiation therapy, which have already individually shown a significant normal tissue’s sparing. This alliance aims to integrate the benefits of those techniques in a single approach. Abstract (1) Background: Proton Arc Therapy and Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy are two novel therapeutic approaches with the potential to lower the normal tissue complication probability, widening the therapeutic window for radioresistant tumors. While the benefits of both modalities have been individually evaluated, their combination and its potential advantages are being assessed in this proof-of-concept study for the first time. (2) Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were employed to evaluate the dose and LET distributions in brain tumor irradiations. (3) Results: a net reduction in the dose to normal tissues (up to 90%), and the preservation of the spatial fractionation of the dose were achieved for all configurations evaluated. Additionally, Proton Minibeam Arc Therapy (pMBAT) reduces the volumes exposed to high-dose and high-LET values at expense of increased low-dose and intermediate-LET values. (4) Conclusions: pMBAT enhances the individual benefits of proton minibeams while keeping those of conventional proton arc therapy. These results might facilitate the path towards patients’ treatments since lower peak doses in normal tissues would be needed than in the case of a single array of proton minibeams.
Collapse
|
20
|
Burg JM, Flatten V, Witt M, Derksen L, Weber U, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Vorwerk H, Zink K, Baumann KS. Experimental determination of modulation power of lung tissue for particle therapy. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34844221 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac3e0d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
In particle therapy of lung tumors, modulating effects on the particle beam may occur due to the microscopic structure of the lung tissue. These effects are caused by the heterogeneous nature of the lung tissue and cannot be completely taken into account during treatment planning, because these micro structures are too small to be fully resolved in the planning CT. In several publications, a new material parameter called modulation power (Pmod) was introduced to characterize the effect. For various artificial lung surrogates, this parameter was measured and published by other groups and ranges up to approximately 1000μm. Studies investigating the influence of the modulation power on the dose distribution during irradiation are using this parameter in the rang of 100-800μm. More precise measurements forPmodon real lung tissue have not yet been published. In this work, the modulation power of real lung tissue was measured using porcine lungs in order to produce more reliable data ofPmodfor real lung tissue. For this purpose,ex-vivoporcine lungs were frozen in a ventilated state and measurements in a carbon ion-beam were performed. Due to the way the lungs were prepared and transferred to a solid state, the lung structures that modulate the beam could also be examined in detail using micro CT imaging. An optimization of the established methods of measuring the modulation power, which takes better account of the typical structures within lung tissue, was developed as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Michael Burg
- University of Applied Sciences Giessen, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Germany.,University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Germany
| | - Veronika Flatten
- University of Applied Sciences Giessen, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Germany.,University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Germany.,Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Witt
- University of Applied Sciences Giessen, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Germany.,University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Germany.,Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany
| | - Larissa Derksen
- University of Applied Sciences Giessen, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Germany
| | - Uli Weber
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
- University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Germany.,Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany
| | - Hilke Vorwerk
- University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Germany.,Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany
| | - Klemens Zink
- University of Applied Sciences Giessen, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Germany.,University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Germany.,Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany
| | - Kilian-Simon Baumann
- University of Applied Sciences Giessen, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Germany.,University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Germany.,Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Relationship between Treatment Plan Dosimetry, Toxicity, and Survival following Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, with or without Chemotherapy, for Stage III Inoperable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235923. [PMID: 34885034 PMCID: PMC8657053 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Various radiotherapy treatment methods are available for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A multidisciplinary tumor board review is recommended to determine the best treatment strategy. In fit patients with inoperable tumors, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) is preferred over sequential CRT (sCRT), due to better survival. Nonetheless, the use of cCRT in stage III NSCLC varies significantly, with concerns about treatment toxicity being a contributory factor. Many reports describing the relationship between overall survival, toxicity, and dosimetry in patients with locally advanced NSCLC are based on clinical trials, with strict criteria for patient selection, including good performance status, pulmonary function, etc. These trials have not always mandated the use of IMRT/VMAT. We therefore performed an institutional analysis to study the relationship between dosimetric parameters and overall survival and toxicity in patients with stage III NSCLC treated with IMRT/VMAT-based techniques in routine clinical practice. Abstract Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) is the preferred treatment for stage III NSCLC because surgery containing multimodality treatment is often not appropriate. Alternatives, often for less fit patients, include sequential CRT and RT alone. Many reports describing the relationship between overall survival (OS), toxicity, and dosimetry are based on clinical trials, with strict criteria for patient selection. We performed an institutional analysis to study the relationship between dosimetric parameters, toxicity, and OS in inoperable patients with stage III NSCLC treated with (hybrid) IMRT/VMAT-based techniques in routine clinical practice. Eligible patients had undergone treatment with radical intent using cCRT, sCRT, or RT alone, planned to a total dose ≥ 50 Gy delivered in ≥15 fractions. All analyses were performed for two patient groups, (1) cCRT (n = 64) and (2) sCRT/RT (n = 65). The toxicity rate differences between the two groups were not significant, and OS was 29 and 17 months, respectively. For sCRT/RT, no dosimetric factors were associated with OS, whereas for cCRT, PTV-volume, esophagus V50 Gy, and contralateral lung V5 Gy were associated. cCRT OS was significantly lower in patients with esophagitis ≥ G2. The overall rate of ≥G3 pneumonitis was low (3%), and the rate of high-grade esophagitis the OS in this real-world patient population was comparable to those reported in clinical trials. Based on this hypothesis-generating data, more aggressive esophageal sparing merits consideration. Institutional auditing and benchmarking of the planning strategy, dosimetry, and outcome have an important role to play in the continuous quality improvement process.
Collapse
|
22
|
Dosimetric study of the interplay effect using three-dimensional motion phantom in proton pencil beam scanning treatment of moving thoracic tumours. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396921000479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim:
The dosimetric and clinical advantages offered by implementation of pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy for moving thoracic tumours is hindered by interplay effect. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of large proton beam spot size along with adaptive aperture (AA) and various motion mitigation techniques on the interplay effect for a range of motion amplitudes in a three-dimensional (3D) respiratory motion phantom.
Materials and Methods:
Point doses using ionisation chamber (IC) and planner dose distributions with radiochromic film were compared against the corresponding treatment planning system (TPS) information. A 3D respiratory motion phantom was scanned either for static or 4D computed tomographic (CT) technique for 6-, 10- and 14-mm motion amplitudes in SI direction. For free breathing (FB) treatment, a tumour was contoured on maximum intensity projection scan and an average scan was used for treatment planning. Each FB treatment was delivered with one, three and five volumetric repaintings (VRs). Three phases (CT40–60%) were extracted from the 4D-CT scans of each motion amplitude for the respiratory-gated treatment and were used for the treatment planning and delivery. All treatment plans were made using AA and robustly optimised with 5-mm set-up and 3·5% density uncertainty. A total of 26 treatment plans were delivered to IC and film using static, dynamic and respiratory-gated treatments combinations. A percent dose difference between IC and TPS for the point dose and gamma indices for film–TPS planner dose comparison was used.
Results:
The dose profile of film and TPS for the static phantom matched well, and percent dose difference between IC and TPS was 0·4%. The percent dose difference for all the gated treatments were below 3·0% except 14-mm motion amplitude-gated treatment. The gamma passing rate was more than 95% for film–TPS comparison for all gated treatment for the investigated gamma acceptance criteria. For FB treatments, the percent dose difference for 6-, 10- and 14-mm motion amplitude was 1·4%, −2·7% and −4·1%, respectively. As the number of VR increased, the percent difference between measured and calculated values decreased. The gamma passing rate met the required tolerance for different acceptance criteria except for the 14-mm motion amplitude FB treatment.
Conclusion:
The PBS technique for the FB thoracic treatments up to 10-mm motion amplitude can be implemented with an acceptable accuracy using large proton beam spot size, AA and robust optimisation. The impact of the interplay effect can be reduced with VR and respiratory-gated treatment and extend the treatable tumour motion amplitude.
Collapse
|
23
|
Seo YS, Park WY, Kim SW, Kim D, Min BJ, Kim WD. Virtual randomized study comparing lobectomy and particle beam therapy for clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer in operable patients. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2021; 62:884-893. [PMID: 34218277 PMCID: PMC8438263 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
To the best of our knowledge there have been no randomized controlled trials comparing lobectomy-a standard treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-and particle beam therapy (PBT), the best performing existing radiotherapy. We conducted a virtual randomized trial in medically operable patients with stage IA NSCLC to compare lobectomy and PBT effectiveness. A Markov model was developed to predict life expectancy after lobectomy and PBT in a cohort of patients with stage IA NSCLC. Ten thousand virtual patients were randomly assigned to each group. Sensitivity analyses were performed as model variables and scenarios changed to determine which treatment strategy was best for improving life expectancy. All estimated model parameters were determined using variables extracted from a systematic literature review of previously published articles. The preferred strategy differed depending on patient age. In young patients, lobectomy showed better life expectancy than that of PBT. The difference in life expectancy between lobectomy and PBT was statistically insignificant in older patients. Our model predicted lobectomy as the preferred strategy when operative mortality was under 5%. However, the preferred strategy changed to PBT if operative mortality post lobectomy was over 5%. For medically operable patients with stage IA NSCLC, our Markov model revealed the preferred strategy of lobectomy or PBT regarding operative mortality changed with varying age and comorbidity. Until randomized controlled trial results become available, we hope the current results will provide a rationale background for clinicians to decide treatment modalities for patients with stage IA NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Seok Seo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju 28644, Korea
| | - Woo-Yoon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
| | - Si-Wook Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
| | - Dohun Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
| | - Byung Jun Min
- Corresponding authors: Byung Jun Min, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju 28644, Korea. Phone: +82-43-269-6213, Fax: +82-43-269-6208, E-mail: ; Won-Dong Kim, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea. Phone: +82-43-269-6212, Fax: +82-43-269-6208, E-mail:
| | - Won-Dong Kim
- Corresponding authors: Byung Jun Min, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju 28644, Korea. Phone: +82-43-269-6213, Fax: +82-43-269-6208, E-mail: ; Won-Dong Kim, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea. Phone: +82-43-269-6212, Fax: +82-43-269-6208, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Flatten V, Burg JM, Witt M, Derksen L, Fragoso Costa P, Wulff J, Bäumer C, Timmermann B, Weber U, Vorwerk H, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Zink K, Baumann KS. Estimating the modulating effect of lung tissue in particle therapy using a clinical CT voxel histogram analysis. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34298533 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac176e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
To treat lung tumours with particle therapy, different additional tasks and challenges in treatment planning and application have to be addressed thoroughly. One of these tasks is the quantification and consideration of the Bragg peak degradation due to lung tissue: As lung is an heterogeneous tissue, the Bragg peak is broadened when particles traverse the microscopic alveoli. These are not fully resolved in clinical CT images and thus, the effect is not considered in the dose calculation. In this work, a correlation between the CT histograms of heterogeneous material and the impact on the Bragg peak curve is presented. Different inorganic materials were scanned with a conventional CT scanner and additionally, the Bragg peak degradation was measured in a proton beam and was then quantified. A model is proposed that allows an estimation of the modulation power by performing a histogram analysis on the CT scan. To validate the model for organic samples, a second measurement series was performed with frozen porcine lunge samples. This allows to investigate the possible limits of the proposed model in a set-up closer to clinical conditions. For lung substitutes, the agreement between model and measurement is within ±0.05 mm and for the organic lung samples, within ±0.15 mm. This work presents a novel, simple and efficient method to estimate if and how much a material or a distinct region (within the lung) is degrading the Bragg peak on the basis of a common clinical CT image. Up until now, only a direct in-beam measurement of the region or material of interest could answer this question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronika Flatten
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg Campus Marburg, Marburg, GERMANY
| | - Jan Michael Burg
- , University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, GERMANY
| | - Matthias Witt
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg Campus Marburg, Marburg, GERMANY
| | - Larissa Derksen
- , University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Giessen, GERMANY
| | | | - Jörg Wulff
- Medical Physics, Westdeutsches Protonentherapiezentrum Essen gGmbH, Essen, GERMANY
| | | | - Beate Timmermann
- Deparment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, GERMANY
| | - Uli Weber
- , GSI Helmholtzzentrum fur Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Hessen, GERMANY
| | - Hilke Vorwerk
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Marburg, GERMANY
| | - Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, GERMANY
| | - Klemens Zink
- University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Marburg, GERMANY
| | - Kilian-Simon Baumann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Marburg, GERMANY
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhang Y, Li Z, Chen Y, Tan L, Zeng Z, Ding J, Du S. Induction Strategy for Locally Advanced Thymoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:704220. [PMID: 34367988 PMCID: PMC8339962 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.704220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery remains cornerstone for the management of thymoma. Complete surgical resection (R0), is recognized as the constant and significant factor for prognosis. However, in locally advanced (Masaoka-Koga stages III-IVa) thymomas, achieving R0 resection remains challenging due to local-regional invasion of the disease. Induction treatment, with the aim of reducing bulky tumor mass, offers new strategy to facilitate totally surgical resection. Herein, we reviewed recent progress and provided a comprehensive overview of induction strategy in locally advance thymoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zongjuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yixing Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lijie Tan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhaochong Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianyong Ding
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shisuo Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Clinical Outcomes of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Propensity Score Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143497. [PMID: 34298711 PMCID: PMC8307066 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This study compared the efficacy and safety of pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBSPT) versus intensity-modulated (photon) radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively reviewed 219 patients with stage III NSCLC who received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy between November 2016 and December 2018. Twenty-five patients (11.4%) underwent PBSPT (23 with single-field optimization) and 194 patients (88.6%) underwent IMRT. Rates of locoregional control (LRC), overall survival, and acute/late toxicities were compared between the groups using propensity score-adjusted analyses. Patients treated with PBSPT were older (median: 67 vs. 62 years) and had worse pulmonary function at baseline (both FEV1 and DLCO) compared to those treated with IMRT. With comparable target coverage, PBSPT exhibited superior sparing of the lung, heart, and spinal cord to radiation exposure compared to IMRT. At a median follow-up of 21.7 (interquartile range: 16.8-26.8) months, the 2-year LRC rates were 72.1% and 84.1% in the IMRT and PBSPT groups, respectively (p = 0.287). The rates of grade ≥ 3 esophagitis were 8.2% and 20.0% after IMRT and PBSPT (p = 0.073), respectively, while corresponding rates of grade ≥ 2 radiation pneumonitis were 28.9% and 16.0%, respectively (p = 0.263). PBSPT appears to be an effective and safe treatment technique even for patients with poor lung function, and it does not jeopardize LRC.
Collapse
|
27
|
Liu G, Zhao L, Qin A, Grills I, Deraniyagala R, Stevens C, Zhang S, Yan D, Li X, Ding X. Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Using Spot-Scanning Proton Arc (SPArc) Therapy: A Feasibility Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:664455. [PMID: 33968770 PMCID: PMC8100671 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.664455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We developed a 4D interplay effect model to quantitatively evaluate breathing-induced interplay effects and assess the feasibility of utilizing spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy for hypo-fractionated lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The model was then validated by retrospective application to clinical cases. Materials and Methods A digital lung 4DCT phantoms was used to mimic targets in diameter of 3cm with breathing motion amplitudes: 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm, respectively. Two planning groups based on robust optimization were generated: (1) Two-field Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) plans and (2) SPArc plans via a partial arc. 5,000 cGy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was prescribed to the internal target volume (ITV) in five fractions. To quantitatively assess the breathing induced interplay effect, the 4D dynamic dose was calculated by synchronizing the breathing pattern with the simulated proton machine delivery sequence, including IMPT, Volumetric repainting (IMPTvolumetric), iso-layered repainting (IMPTlayer) and SPArc. Ten lung patients’ 4DCT previously treated with VMAT SBRT, were used to validate the digital lung tumor model. Normal tissue complicated probability (NTCP) of chestwall toxicity was calculated. Result Target dose were degraded as the tumor motion amplitude increased. The 4D interplay effect phantom model indicated that motion mitigation effectiveness using SPArc was about five times of IMPTvolumetric or IMPTlayer using maximum MU/spot as 0.5 MU at 20 mm motion amplitude. The retrospective study showed that SPArc has an advantage in normal tissue sparing. The probability of chestwall’s toxicity were significantly improved from 40.2 ± 29.0% (VMAT) (p = 0.01) and 16.3 ± 12.0% (IMPT) (p = 0.01) to 10.1 ± 5.4% (SPArc). SPArc could play a significant role in the interplay effect mitigation with breathing-induced motion more than 20 mm, where the target D99 of 4D dynamic dose for patient #10 was improved from 4,514 ± 138 cGy [RBE] (IMPT) vs. 4,755 ± 129 cGy [RBE] (SPArc) (p = 0.01). Conclusion SPArc effectively mitigated the interplay effect for proton lung SBRT compared to IMPT with repainting and was associated with normal tissue sparing. This technology may make delivery of proton SBRT more technically feasible and less complex with fewer concerns over underdosing the target compared to other proton therapy techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gang Liu
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Lewei Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - An Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Inga Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Rohan Deraniyagala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Craig Stevens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Sheng Zhang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Di Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Xiaoqiang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Xuanfeng Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Liu R, Sun B, Zhang T, Williamson JF, O'Sullivan JA, Zhao T. Dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in passive scattering proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:6-14. [PMID: 33797840 PMCID: PMC8130244 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The objective of this study was to investigate the dosimetric impact of range uncertainty in a large cohort of patients receiving passive scatter proton therapy. Methods A cohort of 120 patients were reviewed in this study retrospectively, of which 61 were brain, 39 lung, and 20 prostate patients. Range uncertainties of ±3.5% (overshooting and undershooting by 3.5%, respectively) were added and recalculated on the original plans, which had been planned according to our clinical planning protocol while keeping beamlines, apertures, compensators, and dose grids intact. Changes in the coverage on CTV and DVH for critical organs were compared and analyzed. Correlation between dose change and minimal distance between CTV and critical organs were also investigated. Results Although CTV coverages and maximum dose to critical organs were largely maintained for most brain patients, large variations over 5% were still observed sporadically. Critical organs, such as brainstem and chiasm, could still be affected by range uncertainty at 4 cm away from CTV. Coverage and OARs in lung and prostate patients were less likely to be affected by range uncertainty with very few exceptions. Conclusion The margin recipe in modern TPS leads to clinically acceptable OAR doses in the presence of range uncertainties. However, range uncertainties still pose a noticeable challenge for small but critical serial organs near tumors, and occasionally for large parallel organs that are located distal to incident proton beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruirui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Baozhou Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Tiezhi Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jeffery F Williamson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Joseph A O'Sullivan
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Tianyu Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Vlaskou Badra E, Baumgartl M, Fabiano S, Jongen A, Guckenberger M. Stereotactic radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: current standards and ongoing research. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:1930-1949. [PMID: 34012804 PMCID: PMC8107760 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows for the non-invasive and precise delivery of ablative radiation dose. The use and availability of SBRT has increased rapidly over the past decades. SBRT has been proven to be a safe, effective and efficient treatment for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is presently considered the standard of care in the treatment of medically or functionally inoperable patients. Evidence from prospective randomized trials on the optimal treatment of patients deemed medically operable remains owing, as three trials comparing SBRT to surgery in this cohort were terminated prematurely due to poor accrual. Yet, SBRT in early stage NSCLC is associated with favorable toxicity profiles and excellent rates of local control, prompting discussion in regard of the treatment of medically operable patients, where the standard of care currently remains surgical resection. Although local control in early stage NSCLC after SBRT is high, distant failure remains an issue, prompting research interest to the combination of SBRT and systemic treatment. Evolving advances in SBRT technology further facilitate the safe treatment of patients with medically or anatomically challenging situations. In this review article, we discuss international guidelines and the current standard of care, ongoing clinical challenges and future directions from the clinical and technical point of view.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenia Vlaskou Badra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Baumgartl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Fabiano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Aurélien Jongen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Radiation therapy plays an integral role in the treatment of all stages of non-small cell lung cancer. Survival outcomes are improving, but radiation therapy remains associated with long-term toxicity. Recently, it has become evident that the heart is an important organ at risk for treatment-related morbidity. In this review, we discuss the hypothesis that particle radiation therapy offers superior dosimetry compared with photon-based treatment, and that this comparative advantage translates into clinically meaningful cardiac toxicity reduction with similar local tumor control. We discuss the evidence in non-small cell lung cancer to date, the ongoing prospective trials that may provide additional insight, and the opportunities to optimally integrate particle therapy into future prospective investigation.
Collapse
|
31
|
Paganetti H, Grassberger C, Sharp GC. Physics of Particle Beam and Hypofractionated Beam Delivery in NSCLC. Semin Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:162-169. [PMID: 33610274 PMCID: PMC7905707 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The dosimetric advantages of particle therapy lead to significantly reduced integral dose to normal tissues, making it an attractive treatment option for body sites such as the thorax. With reduced normal tissue dose comes the potential for dose escalation, toxicity reduction, or hypofractionation. While proton and heavy ion therapy have been used extensively for NSCLC, there are challenges in planning and delivery compared with X-ray-based radiation therapy. Particularly, range uncertainties compounded by breathing motion have to be considered. This article summarizes the current state of particle therapy for NSCLC with a specific focus on the impact of dosimetric uncertainties in planning and delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Gregory C Sharp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ohnishi K, Ishikawa H, Nakazawa K, Shiozawa T, Mori Y, Nakamura M, Okumura T, Sekine I, Hizawa N, Sakurai H. Long-term outcomes of high-dose (74 GyE) proton beam therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for stage III nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Thorac Cancer 2021; 12:1320-1327. [PMID: 33675285 PMCID: PMC8088926 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the long-term outcomes of high-dose (74 GyE) proton beam therapy (PBT) with concurrent chemotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS Between July 2007 and March 2018, 45 patients with stage III NSCLC were treated with passive-scattering PBT of 74 GyE and concurrent chemotherapy. Among the 45 patients, the median age was 62 years (range 39-79 years) and 32 patients were men. The clinical stages were stage IIIA in 14 patients and stage IIIB in 31 patients. Thirty-six patients received chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin and vinorelbine. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 42.1 months (range 6.4-127.0 months) for all patients and 63.5 months (range 9.4-127.0 months) for the 12 survivors. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 63.7% and 38.8%, respectively, and the median overall survival was 49.1 months. Over the follow-up period, disease recurrence was observed in 32 (71%) patients. The 3- and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 22.2% and 17.7%, respectively, with a median progression-free survival of 13.1 months. In-field control improved survival and the in-field control rate was better in patients with T0-3 tumors (p = 0.023) and stage IIIA/IIIB-N3 disease (p = 0.030). Dosimetric parameters of the heart and lung were not associated with survival. No grade 4 or 5 acute or late non-hematologic toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS Passive-scattering PBT of 74 GyE with chemotherapy showed favorable survival and a low incidence of severe adverse events in patients with stage III NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayoko Ohnishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.,Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.,QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kensuke Nakazawa
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Shiozawa
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Yutaro Mori
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Ikuo Sekine
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Hizawa
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wong SL, Alshaikhi J, Grimes H, Amos RA, Poynter A, Rompokos V, Gulliford S, Royle G, Liao Z, Sharma RA, Mendes R. Retrospective Planning Study of Patients with Superior Sulcus Tumours Comparing Pencil Beam Scanning Protons to Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e118-e131. [PMID: 32798157 PMCID: PMC7883303 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Twenty per cent of patients with non-small cell lung cancer present with stage III locally advanced disease. Precision radiotherapy with pencil beam scanning (PBS) protons may improve outcomes. However, stage III is a heterogeneous group and accounting for complex tumour motion is challenging. As yet, it remains unclear as to whom will benefit. In our retrospective planning study, we explored if patients with superior sulcus tumours (SSTs) are a select cohort who might benefit from this treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with SSTs treated with radical radiotherapy using four-dimensional planning computed tomography between 2010 and 2015 were identified. Tumour motion was assessed and excluded if greater than 5 mm. Photon volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and PBS proton single-field optimisation plans, with and without inhomogeneity corrections, were generated retrospectively. Robustness analysis was assessed for VMAT and PBS plans involving: (i) 5 mm geometric uncertainty, with an additional 3.5% range uncertainty for proton plans; (ii) verification plans at maximal inhalation and exhalation. Comparative dosimetric and robustness analyses were carried out. RESULTS Ten patients were suitable. The mean clinical target volume D95 was 98.1% ± 0.4 (97.5-98.8) and 98.4% ± 0.2 (98.1-98.9) for PBS and VMAT plans, respectively. All normal tissue tolerances were achieved. The same four PBS and VMAT plans failed robustness assessment. Inhomogeneity corrections minimally impacted proton plan robustness and made it worse in one case. The most important factor affecting target coverage and robustness was the clinical target volume entering the spinal canal. Proton plans significantly reduced the mean lung dose (by 21.9%), lung V5, V10, V20 (by 47.9%, 36.4%, 12.1%, respectively), mean heart dose (by 21.4%) and thoracic vertebra dose (by 29.2%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In this planning study, robust PBS plans were achievable in carefully selected patients. Considerable dose reductions to the lung, heart and thoracic vertebra were possible without compromising target coverage. Sparing these lymphopenia-related organs may be particularly important in this era of immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S-L Wong
- University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - J Alshaikhi
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Saudi Particle Therapy Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - H Grimes
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R A Amos
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - A Poynter
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - V Rompokos
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Gulliford
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G Royle
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Z Liao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - R A Sharma
- University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - R Mendes
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Boyce-Fappiano D, Nguyen QN, Chapman BV, Allen PK, Gjyshi O, Pezzi TA, De B, Gomez D, Lin SH, Chang JY, Liao Z, Lee P, Gandhi SJ. Single Institution Experience of Proton and Photon-based Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2021; 22:e745-e755. [PMID: 33707003 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non-small-cell lung cancer remains controversial with studies showing no overall survival (OS) benefit in the setting of excessive cardiopulmonary toxicity. Proton beam therapy (PBT) can potentially reduce toxicity with improved organ-at-risk sparing. We evaluated outcomes of PORT patients treated with PBT and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective review of 136 PORT patients (61 PBT, 75 IMRT) treated from 2003 to 2016. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess oncologic outcomes. A Cox regression was conducted to identify associated factors. Total toxicity burden (TTB) was defined as grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis, cardiac, or esophageal toxicity. RESULTS Median OS was 76 and 46 months for PBT and IMRT with corresponding 1- and 5-year OS of 85.3%, 50.9% and 89.3%, 37.2% (P = .38), respectively. V30 Gy heart (odds ratio [OR], 144.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91-7214; P = .013) and V5 Gy lung (OR, 15.8; 95% CI, 1.22-202.7; P = .03) were predictive of OS. Organ-at-risk sparing was improved with PBT versus IMRT; mean heart 2.0 versus 7.4 Gy (P < .01), V30 Gy heart 2.6% versus 10.7% (P < .01), mean lung 7.9 versus 10.4 Gy (P = .042), V5 Gy lung 23.4% versus 42.1% (P < .01), and V10 Gy lung 20.4% versus 29.6% (P < .01). TTB was reduced with PBT (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.83; P = .017). Rates of cardiac toxicity were 14.7% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .09). Rates of ≥ grade 2 pneumonitis were 17.0% IMRT and 4.9% PBT (P = .104). CONCLUSION PBT improved cardiac and lung sparing and reduced toxicity compared with IMRT. Considering the impact of cardiopulmonary toxicity on PORT outcomes, PBT warrants prospective evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Boyce-Fappiano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bhavana V Chapman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Pamela K Allen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Olsi Gjyshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Todd A Pezzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brian De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Daniel Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Saumil J Gandhi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gjyshi O, Xu T, Elhammali A, Boyce-Fappiano D, Chun SG, Gandhi S, Lee P, Chen AB, Lin SH, Chang JY, Tsao A, Gay CM, Zhu XR, Zhang X, Heymach JV, Fossella FV, Lu C, Nguyen QN, Liao Z. Toxicity and Survival After Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Versus Passive Scattering Proton Therapy for NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2021; 16:269-277. [PMID: 33198942 PMCID: PMC7855203 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMPT) is dosimetrically superior to passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) for locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC), direct comparisons of clinical outcomes are lacking. Here, we compare toxicity profiles and clinical outcomes after IMPT versus PSPT for LA-NSCLC. METHODS This is a nonrandomized, comparative study of two independent cohorts with LA-NSCLC (stage II-IIIB, stage IV with solitary brain metastasis) treated with concurrent chemotherapy and proton beam therapy. Toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0) and outcomes were prospectively collected as part of a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00915005) or prospective registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00991094). RESULTS Of 139 patients, 86 (62%) received PSPT and 53 (38%) IMPT; median follow-up times were 23.9 and 29.0 months, respectively. IMPT delivered lower mean radiation doses to the lungs (PSPT 16.0 Gy versus IMPT 13.0 Gy, p < 0.001), heart (10.7 Gy versus 6.6 Gy, p = 0.004), and esophagus (27.4 Gy versus 21.8 Gy, p = 0.005). Consequently, the IMPT cohort had lower rates of grade 3 or higher pulmonary (17% versus 2%, p = 0.005) and cardiac (11% versus 0%, p = 0.01) toxicities. Six patients (7%) with PSPT and zero patients (0%) with IMPT experienced grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Lower rates of pulmonary (28% versus 3%, p = 0.006) and cardiac (14% versus 0%, p = 0.05) toxicities were observed in the IMPT cohort even after propensity score matching for baseline imbalances. There was also a trend toward longer median overall survival in the IMPT group (23.9 mo versus 36.2 mo, p = 0.09). No difference was found in the 3-year rates of local (25% versus 20%, p = 0.44), local-regional (29% versus 36%, p = 0.56) and distant (52% versus 51%, p = 0.71) recurrences. CONCLUSIONS IMPT is associated with lower radiation doses to the lung, heart, and esophagus, and lower rates of grade 3 or higher cardiopulmonary toxicity; additional clinical studies will be needed to assess the potential differences in survival between the two techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olsi Gjyshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ting Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adnan Elhammali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David Boyce-Fappiano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephen G Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Saumil Gandhi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Aileen B Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anne Tsao
- Department of Thoracic-Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Carl M Gay
- Department of Thoracic-Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - X Ronald Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - John V Heymach
- Department of Thoracic-Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Frank V Fossella
- Department of Thoracic-Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Charles Lu
- Department of Thoracic-Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chiang JS, Yu NY, Daniels TB, Liu W, Schild SE, Sio TT. Proton beam radiotherapy for patients with early-stage and advanced lung cancer: a narrative review with contemporary clinical recommendations. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:1270-1285. [PMID: 33717598 PMCID: PMC7947490 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-2501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Although lung cancer rates are decreasing nationally, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer related death. Despite advancements in treatment and technology, overall survival (OS) for lung cancer remains poor. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is an advanced radiation therapy (RT) modality for treatment of lung cancer with the potential to achieve dose escalation to tumor while sparing critical structures due to higher target conformality. In early and late-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), dosimetric studies demonstrated reduced doses to organs at risk (OARs) such as the lung, spinal cord, and heart, and clinical studies report limited toxicities with PBT, including hypofractionated regimens. In limited-stage SCLC, studies showed that regimens chemo RT including PBT were well tolerated, which may help optimize clinical outcomes. Improved toxicity profiles may be beneficial in post-operative radiotherapy, for which initial dosimetric and clinical data are encouraging. Sparing of OARs may also increase the proportion of patients able to complete reirradiation for recurrent disease. However, there are various challenges of using PBT including a higher financial burden on healthcare and limited data supporting its cost-effectiveness. Further studies are needed to identify subgroups that benefit from PBT based on prognostic factors, and to evaluate PBT combined with immunotherapy, in order to elucidate the benefit that PBT may offer future lung cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Chiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Nathan Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Thomas B Daniels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Czerska K, Emert F, Kopec R, Langen K, McClelland JR, Meijers A, Miyamoto N, Riboldi M, Shimizu S, Terunuma T, Zou W, Knopf A, Rucinski A. Clinical practice vs. state-of-the-art research and future visions: Report on the 4D treatment planning workshop for particle therapy - Edition 2018 and 2019. Phys Med 2021; 82:54-63. [PMID: 33588228 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The 4D Treatment Planning Workshop for Particle Therapy, a workshop dedicated to the treatment of moving targets with scanned particle beams, started in 2009 and since then has been organized annually. The mission of the workshop is to create an informal ground for clinical medical physicists, medical physics researchers and medical doctors interested in the development of the 4D technology, protocols and their translation into clinical practice. The 10th and 11th editions of the workshop took place in Sapporo, Japan in 2018 and Krakow, Poland in 2019, respectively. This review report from the Sapporo and Krakow workshops is structured in two parts, according to the workshop programs. The first part comprises clinicians and physicists review of the status of 4D clinical implementations. Corresponding talks were given by speakers from five centers around the world: Maastro Clinic (The Netherlands), University Medical Center Groningen (The Netherlands), MD Anderson Cancer Center (United States), University of Pennsylvania (United States) and The Proton Beam Therapy Center of Hokkaido University Hospital (Japan). The second part is dedicated to novelties in 4D research, i.e. motion modelling, artificial intelligence and new technologies which are currently being investigated in the radiotherapy field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Czerska
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland.
| | - Frank Emert
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
| | - Renata Kopec
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland
| | - Katja Langen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jamie R McClelland
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Arturs Meijers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Naoki Miyamoto
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan; Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Marco Riboldi
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Department of Medical Physics, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan; Department of Radiation Medical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Terunuma
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Japan; Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Japan
| | - Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Antje Knopf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Antoni Rucinski
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Patel NV, Yu NY, Koroulakis A, Diwanji T, Sawant A, Sio TT, Mohindra P. Proton therapy for thoracic malignancies: a review of oncologic outcomes. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2021; 21:177-191. [PMID: 33118427 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1844567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Radiotherapy is an integral component in the treatment of the majority of thoracic malignancies. By taking advantage of the steep dose fall-off characteristic of protons combined with modern optimization and delivery techniques, proton beam therapy (PBT) has emerged as a potential tool to improve oncologic outcomes while reducing toxicities from treatment.Areas covered: We review the physical properties and treatment techniques that form the basis of PBT as applicable for thoracic malignancies, including a brief discussion on the recent advances that show promise to enhance treatment planning and delivery. The dosimetric advantages and clinical outcomes of PBT are critically reviewed for each of the major thoracic malignancies, including lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mesothelioma, thymic cancer, and primary mediastinal lymphoma.Expert opinion: Despite clear dosimetric benefits with PBT in thoracic radiotherapy, the improvement in clinical outcomes remains to be seen. Nevertheless, with the incorporation of newer techniques, PBT remains a promising modality and ongoing randomized studies will clarify its role to determine which patients with thoracic malignancies receive the most benefit. Re-irradiation, advanced disease requiring high cardio-pulmonary irradiation volume and younger patients will likely derive maximum benefit with modern PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirav V Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Nathan Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Antony Koroulakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tejan Diwanji
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Amit Sawant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Baumann BC, Mitra N, Harton JG, Xiao Y, Wojcieszynski AP, Gabriel PE, Zhong H, Geng H, Doucette A, Wei J, O'Dwyer PJ, Bekelman JE, Metz JM. Comparative Effectiveness of Proton vs Photon Therapy as Part of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6:237-246. [PMID: 31876914 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Importance Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard-of-care curative treatment for many cancers but is associated with substantial morbidity. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy administered with proton therapy might reduce toxicity and achieve comparable cancer control outcomes compared with conventional photon radiotherapy by reducing the radiation dose to normal tissues. Objective To assess whether proton therapy in the setting of concurrent chemoradiotherapy is associated with fewer 90-day unplanned hospitalizations (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4 [CTCAEv4], grade ≥3) or other adverse events and similar disease-free and overall survival compared with concurrent photon therapy and chemoradiotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective, nonrandomized comparative effectiveness study included 1483 adult patients with nonmetastatic, locally advanced cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with curative intent from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2016, at a large academic health system. Three hundred ninety-one patients received proton therapy and 1092, photon therapy. Data were analyzed from October 15, 2018, through February 1, 2019. Interventions Proton vs photon chemoradiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was 90-day adverse events associated with unplanned hospitalizations (CTCAEv4 grade ≥3). Secondary end points included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status decline during treatment, 90-day adverse events of at least CTCAEv4 grade 2 that limit instrumental activities of daily living, and disease-free and overall survival. Data on adverse events and survival were gathered prospectively. Modified Poisson regression models with inverse propensity score weighting were used to model adverse event outcomes, and Cox proportional hazards regression models with weighting were used for survival outcomes. Propensity scores were estimated using an ensemble machine-learning approach. Results Among the 1483 patients included in the analysis (935 men [63.0%]; median age, 62 [range, 18-93] years), those receiving proton therapy were significantly older (median age, 66 [range, 18-93] vs 61 [range, 19-91] years; P < .01), had less favorable Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores (median, 3.0 vs 2.0; P < .01), and had lower integral radiation dose to tissues outside the target (mean [SD] volume, 14.1 [6.4] vs 19.1 [10.6] cGy/cc × 107; P < .01). Baseline grade ≥2 toxicity (22% vs 24%; P = .37) and ECOG performance status (mean [SD], 0.62 [0.74] vs 0.68 [0.80]; P = .16) were similar between the 2 cohorts. In propensity score weighted-analyses, proton chemoradiotherapy was associated with a significantly lower relative risk of 90-day adverse events of at least grade 3 (0.31; 95% CI, 0.15-0.66; P = .002), 90-day adverse events of at least grade 2 (0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93; P = .006), and decline in performance status during treatment (0.51; 95% CI, 0.37-0.71; P < .001). There was no difference in disease-free or overall survival. Conclusions and Relevance In this analysis, proton chemoradiotherapy was associated with significantly reduced acute adverse events that caused unplanned hospitalizations, with similar disease-free and overall survival. Prospective trials are warranted to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian C Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Nandita Mitra
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Joanna G Harton
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Ying Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | | | - Peter E Gabriel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Haoyu Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Huaizhi Geng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Abigail Doucette
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Jenny Wei
- currently a medical student at Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Peter J O'Dwyer
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Justin E Bekelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - James M Metz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.,Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kharod SM, Nichols RC, Henderson RH, Morris CG, Pham DC, Seeram VK, Jones LM, Antonio-Miranda M, Siragusa DA, Li Z, Flampouri S, Hoppe BS. Image-Guided Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Study. Int J Part Ther 2020; 7:1-10. [PMID: 33274252 PMCID: PMC7707327 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00013.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Due to the excellent outcomes with image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the low treatment-related toxicities using proton therapy (PT), we investigated treatment outcomes and toxicities when delivering hypofractionated PT. Materials and Methods Between 2009 and 2018, 22 patients with T1 to T2 N0M0 NSCLC (45% T1, 55% T2) received image-guided hypofractionated PT. The median age at diagnosis was 72 years (range, 58-90). Patients underwent 4-dimensional computed tomography simulation following fiducial marker placement, and daily image guidance was performed. Nine patients (41%) were treated with 48 GyRBE in 4 fractions for peripheral lesions, and 13 patients (59%) were treated with 60 GyRBE in 10 fractions for central lesions. Patients were assessed for CTCAEv4 toxicities with computed tomography imaging for tumor assessment. The primary endpoint was grade 3 to 5 toxicity at 1 year. Results The median follow-up for all patients was 3.5 years (range, 0.2-8.8 years). The overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 81% and 49%, respectively. Cause-specific survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 100% and 75%, respectively. The 3-year local, regional, and distant control rates were 86%, 85%, and 95%, respectively. Four patients experienced in-field recurrences between 18 and 45 months after treatment. One patient (5%) developed a late grade 3 bronchial stricture requiring hospitalization and stent. Conclusion Image-guided hypofractionated PT for early-stage NSCLC provides promising local control and long-term survival with a low likelihood of toxicity. Regional nodal and distant relapses remain a problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivam M Kharod
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - R Charles Nichols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Randal H Henderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Dat C Pham
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Vandana K Seeram
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Lisa M Jones
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Daniel A Siragusa
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Zuofeng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory Proton Therapy Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Higher Dose Volumes May Be Better for Evaluating Radiation Pneumonitis in Lung Proton Therapy Patients Compared With Traditional Photon-Based Dose Constraints. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:943-950. [PMID: 33083657 PMCID: PMC7557193 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The dosimetric parameters used clinically to reduce the likelihood of radiation pneumonitis (RP) for lung cancer radiation therapy have traditionally been V20Gy ≤ 30% to 35% and mean lung dose ≤ 20 to 23 Gy; however, these parameters are derived based on studies from photon therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether such dosimetric predictors for RP are applicable for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) patients treated with proton therapy. Methods and Materials In the study, 160 (78 photon, 82 proton) patients with LA-NSCLC treated with chemoradiotherapy between 2011 and 2016 were retrospectively identified. Forty (20 photon, 20 proton) patients exhibited grade ≥2 RP after therapy. Dose volume histograms for the uninvolved lung were extracted for each patient. The percent lung volumes receiving above various dose levels were obtained in addition to V20Gy and Dmean. These dosimetric parameters and patient characteristics were evaluated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression tests. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to obtain the optimal dosimetric constraints through analyzing RP and non-RP sensitivity and specificity values. Results The multivariate analysis showed V40Gy and Dmean to be statistically significant for proton and photon patients, respectively. V35Gy to V50Gy were strongly correlated to V40Gy for proton patients. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curves, V35Gy to V50Gy had the highest area under the curve compared with other dose levels for proton patients. A potential dosimetric constraint for RP predictor in proton patients is V40Gy ≤ 23%. Conclusions In addition to V20Gy and Dmean, the lung volume receiving higher doses, such as V40Gy, may be used as an additional indicator for RP in LA-NSCLC patients treated with proton therapy.
Collapse
|
42
|
Kharod SM, Nichols RC, Henderson RH, Morris CG, Pham DC, Seeram VK, Jones LM, Antonio-Miranda M, Huh S, Li Z, Hoppe BS. Image-guided hypofractionated double-scattering proton therapy in the management of centrally-located early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:1164-1170. [PMID: 32394776 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1759821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of centrally-located early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is challenging due to the proximity of critical normal structures to the tumor target. The purpose of this study was to report the results of our experience in treating centrally-located early-stage NSCLC with hypofractionated proton therapy (PT). MATERIAL AND METHODS Between 2009 and 2018, 23 patients with T1-T2N0M0 NSCLC (T1, 46%; T2, 54%) were treated with image-guided hypofractionated double-scattering PT. The median age at the time of treatment was 74 years (range, 58-88). Patients underwent 4-dimensional computed tomography (CT) simulation following fiducial marker placement, and daily image guidance was performed. All patients were treated with 60 GyRBE in 10 fractions. Patients were assessed for CTCAEv4 toxicities weekly during treatment, and at regular follow-up intervals with CT imaging for tumor assessment. Overall survival, cause-specific survival, local control, regional control, and metastases-free survival were evaluated using cumulative incidence with competing risks. RESULTS Median follow-up for all patients was 3.2 years (range, 0.2-9.2 years). Overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 81% and 50% (95% CI, 27-79%), respectively. Cause-specific survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 81% and 71% (95% CI, 46-92%). The 3-year local, regional, and distant control rates were 90%, 81%, and 87%, respectively. Three patients (13%) experienced local recurrences as their first recurrence, at a median time of 28 months from completion of radiation (range, 18-61 months). Two patients (9%) experienced late grade 3 toxicities, including 1 patient who developed a bronchial stricture that required stent placement. CONCLUSION Image-guided hypofractionated PT for centrally-located early-stage NSCLC provides excellent local control with low rates of grade ≥3 toxicities. For tumors in sensitive locations, PT may provide safer treatment than photon-based treatments due to its dosimetric advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivam M. Kharod
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - R. Charles Nichols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Randal H. Henderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher G. Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Dat C. Pham
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Vandana K. Seeram
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Lisa M. Jones
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Soon Huh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Zuofeng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Bradford S. Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ning MS, Palmer MB, Shah AK, Chambers LC, Garlock LB, Melson BB, Frank SJ. Three-Year Results of a Prospective Statewide Insurance Coverage Pilot for Proton Therapy: Stakeholder Collaboration Improves Patient Access to Care. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:e966-e976. [PMID: 32302271 PMCID: PMC8462618 DOI: 10.1200/jop.19.00437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton therapy is increasingly prescribed, given its potential to improve outcomes; however, prior authorization remains a barrier to access and is associated with frequent denials and treatment delays. We sought to determine whether appropriate access to proton therapy could ensure timely care without overuse or increased costs. METHODS Our large academic cancer center collaborated with a statewide self-funded employer (n = 186,000 enrollees) on an insurance coverage pilot, incorporating a value-based analysis and ensuring preauthorization for appropriate indications. Coverage was ensured for prospective trials and five evidence-supported anatomic sites. Enrollment initiated in 2016 and continued for 3 years. Primary end points were use, authorization time, and cost of care, with case-matched comparison of total charges at 1 month pretreatment through 6 months posttreatment. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were approved over 3 years, with only 22 actually receiving proton therapy, versus a predicted use by 120 patients (P < .01). Median follow-up was 20.1 months, and average authorization time decreased from 17 days to < 1 day (P < .01), significantly enhancing patient access. During this time, 25 patients who met pilot eligibility were instead treated with photons; and 17 patients with > 6 months of follow-up were case matched by treatment site to 17 patients receiving proton therapy, with no significant differences in sex, age, performance status, stage, histology, indication, prescribed fractions, or chemotherapy. Total medical costs (including radiation therapy [RT] and non-RT charges) for patients treated with PBT were lower than expected (a cost increase initially was expected), with no significant difference in total average charges (P = .82), in the context of overall ancillary care use. CONCLUSION This coverage pilot demonstrated that appropriate access to proton therapy does not necessitate overuse or significantly increase comprehensive medical costs. Objective evidence-based coverage polices ensure appropriate patient selection. Stakeholder collaboration can streamline patient access while reducing administrative burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S. Ning
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Laura C. Chambers
- Office of Employee Benefits, The University of Texas System, Austin, TX
| | - Laura B. Garlock
- Office of Employee Benefits, The University of Texas System, Austin, TX
| | - Benjamin B. Melson
- Department of Financial Planning and Analysis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Steven J. Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Proton Therapy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Zhang Q, Cascio E, Li C, Yang Q, Gerweck LE, Huang P, Gottschalk B, Flanz J, Schuemann J. FLASH Investigations Using Protons: Design of Delivery System, Preclinical Setup and Confirmation of FLASH Effect with Protons in Animal Systems. Radiat Res 2020; 194:656-664. [DOI: 10.1667/rade-20-00068.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Qixian Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ethan Cascio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chengming Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Qingyuan Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Leo E. Gerweck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peigen Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bernard Gottschalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jacob Flanz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jan Schuemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Forsthoefel MK, Ballew E, Unger KR, Ahn PH, Rudra S, Pang D, Collins SP, Dritschilo A, Harter W, Paudel N, Collins BT, Lischalk JW. Early Experience of the First Single-Room Gantry Mounted Active Scanning Proton Therapy System at an Integrated Cancer Center. Front Oncol 2020; 10:861. [PMID: 32547953 PMCID: PMC7273355 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Review the early experience with a single-room gantry mounted active scanning proton therapy system. Material and Methods: All patients treated with proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved patient registry. Proton beam radiotherapy was delivered with a 250 MeV gantry mounted synchrocyclotron in a single-room integrated facility within the pre-existing cancer center. Demographic data, cancer diagnoses, treatment technique, and geographic patterns were obtained for all patients. Treatment plans were evaluated for mixed modality therapy. Insurance approval data was collected for all patients treated with PBT. Results: A total of 132 patients were treated with PBT between March 2018 and June 2019. The most common oncologic subsites treated included the central nervous system (22%), gastrointestinal tract (20%), and genitourinary tract (20%). The most common histologies treated included prostate adenocarcinoma (19%), non-small cell lung cancer (10%), primary CNS gliomas (8%), and esophageal cancer (8%). Rationale for PBT treatment included limitation of dose to adjacent critical organs at risk (67%), reirradiation (19%), and patient comorbidities (11%). Patients received at least one x-ray fraction delivered as prescribed (36%) or less commonly due to unplanned machine downtime (34%). Concurrent systemic therapy was administered to 57 patients (43%). Twenty-six patients (20%) were initially denied insurance coverage and required peer-to-peers (65%), written appeals (12%), secondary insurance approval (12%), and comparison x-ray to proton plans (8%) for subsequent approval. Proton beam radiotherapy approval required a median of 17 days from insurance submission. Discussion: Incorporation of PBT into our existing cancer center allowed for multidisciplinary oncologic treatment of a diverse population of patients. Insurance coverage for PBT presents as a significant hurdle and improvements are needed to provide more timely access to necessary oncologic care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew K Forsthoefel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Elizabeth Ballew
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Keith R Unger
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Peter H Ahn
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sonali Rudra
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Dalong Pang
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Anatoly Dritschilo
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - William Harter
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nitika Paudel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Brian T Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jonathan W Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Giaj-Levra N, Borghetti P, Bruni A, Ciammella P, Cuccia F, Fozza A, Franceschini D, Scotti V, Vagge S, Alongi F. Current radiotherapy techniques in NSCLC: challenges and potential solutions. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020; 20:387-402. [PMID: 32321330 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1760094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Radiotherapy is an important therapeutic strategy in the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In recent decades, technological implementations and the introduction of image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) have significantly increased the accuracy and tolerability of radiation therapy.Area covered: In this review, we provide an overview of technological opportunities and future prospects in NSCLC management.Expert opinion: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is now considered the standard approach in patients ineligible for surgery, while in operable cases, it is still under debate. Additionally, in combination with systemic treatment, SBRT is an innovative option for managing oligometastatic patients and features encouraging initial results in clinical outcomes. To date, in inoperable locally advanced NSCLC, the radical dose prescription has not changed (60 Gy in 30 fractions), despite the median overall survival progressively increasing. These results arise from technological improvements in precisely hitting target treatment volumes and organ at risk sparing, which are associated with better treatment qualities. Finally, for the management of NSCLC, proton and carbon ion therapies and the recent development of MR-Linac are new, intriguing technological approaches under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Paolo Borghetti
- Dipartimento di Radioterapia Oncologica, Università e ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alessio Bruni
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio, Emilia, Italy
| | - Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fozza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS.Antonio e Biagio e C.Arrigo Hospital Alessandria, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center- IRCCS - Rozzano (MI), Milano, Italy
| | - Vieri Scotti
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Firenze, Italy
| | - Stefano Vagge
- Radiation oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy.,University of Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Nakamura M, Kageyama SI, Udagawa H, Zenke Y, Yoh K, Niho S, Hojo H, Motegi A, Kirita K, Matsumoto S, Goto K, Akimoto T. Differences in failure patterns according to the EGFR mutation status after proton beam therapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 2020; 149:14-17. [PMID: 32387485 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Revised: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
We analyzed 135 patients (including 27 EGFR-mutant and 29 EGFR-wild) with T1-3N0M0 non-squamous NSCLC treated by PBT. Considering the 3-year cumulative incidence, the EGFR-mutant group showed a significantly lower infield failure rate (9% vs 27%, p = 0.02) and higher out-of-field failure rate (67% vs 40%, p = 0.02) than the EGFR-wild group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaki Nakamura
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
| | - Shun-Ichiro Kageyama
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hibiki Udagawa
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Zenke
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kiyotaka Yoh
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Seiji Niho
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hidehiro Hojo
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Keisuke Kirita
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Singo Matsumoto
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Koichi Goto
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Perspectives on the model-based approach to proton therapy trials: A retrospective study of a lung cancer randomized trial. Radiother Oncol 2020; 147:8-14. [PMID: 32224318 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Revised: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study was to assess whether a model-based approach applied retrospectively to a completed randomized controlled trial (RCT) would have significantly altered the selection of patients of the original trial, using the same selection criteria and endpoint for testing the potential clinical benefit of protons compared to photons. METHODS AND MATERIALS A model-based approach, based on three widely used normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for radiation pneumonitis (RP), was applied retrospectively to a completed non-small cell lung cancer RCT (NCT00915005). It was assumed that patients were selected by the model-based approach if their expected ΔNTCP value was above a threshold of 5%. The endpoint chosen matched that of the original trial, the first occurrence of severe (grade ≥3) RP. RESULTS Our analysis demonstrates that NTCP differences between proton and photon therapy treatments may be too small to support a model-based trial approach for lung cancer using RP as the normal tissue endpoint. The analyzed lung trial showed that less than 19% (32/165) of patients enrolled in the completed trial would have been enrolled in a model-based trial, prescribing photon therapy to all other patients. The number of patients enrolled was also found to be dependent on the type of NTCP model used for evaluating RP, with the three models enrolling 3%, 13% or 19% of patients. This result does show limitations in NTCP models which would affect the success of a model-based trial approach. No conclusion regarding the development of RP in patients randomized by the model-based approach could statistically be made. CONCLUSIONS Uncertainties in the outcome models to predict NTCP are the inherent drawback of a model-based approach to clinical trials. The impact of these uncertainties on enrollment in model-based trials depends on the predicted difference between the two treatment arms and on the set threshold for patient stratification. Our analysis demonstrates that NTCP differences between proton and photon therapy treatments may be too small to support a model-based trial approach for specific treatment sites, such as lung cancer, depending on the chosen normal tissue endpoint.
Collapse
|
49
|
State-of-the-art Review: Interventional Onco-Cardiology. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s11936-020-00809-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
50
|
Chen M, Yang J, Liao Z, Chen J, Xu C, He X, Zhang X, Zhu RX, Li H. Anatomic change over the course of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer patients and its impact on intensity-modulated radiation therapy and passive-scattering proton therapy deliveries. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:55. [PMID: 32138753 PMCID: PMC7059279 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01503-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To quantify tumor anatomic change of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients given passive-scattering proton therapy (PSPT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) through 6–7 weeks of treatment, and analyze the correlation between anatomic change and the need to adopt adaptive radiotherapy (ART). Materials and methods Weekly 4D CT sets of 32 patients (8/8 IMRT with/without ART, 8/8 PSPT with/without ART) acquired during treatment, were registered to the planning CT using an in-house developed deformable registration algorithm. The anatomic change was quantified as the mean variation of the region of interest (ROI) relative to the planning CT by averaging the magnitude of deformation vectors of all voxels within the ROI contour. Mean variations of GTV and CTV were compared between subgroups classified by ART status and treatment modality using the independent t-test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to clarify the effect of anatomic change on the probability of ART adoption. Results There was no significant difference (p = 0.679) for the time-averaged mean CTV variations from the planning CT between IMRT (7.61 ± 2.80 mm) and PSPT (7.21 ± 2.67 mm) patients. However, a significant difference (p = 0.001) was observed between ART (8.93 ± 2.19 mm) and non-ART (5.90 ± 2.33 mm) patients, when treatment modality was not considered. Mean CTV variation from the planning CT in all patients increases significantly (p < 0.001), with a changing rate of 1.77 mm per week. Findings for the GTV change was similar. The logistic regression model correctly predicted 71.9% of cases in ART adoption. The correlation is stronger in the PSPT group with a pseudo R2 value of 0.782, compared to that in the IMRT group (pseudo R2 = 0.182). Conclusion The magnitude of target volume variation over time could be greater than the usual treatment margin. Mean target volume variation from the planning position can be used to identify lung cancer patients that may need ART.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.,Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jinzhong Yang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Zhongxing Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jiayi Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Cheng Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Xiaodong He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ronald X Zhu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. .,Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|