1
|
Chang S, Lv J, Wang X, Su J, Bian C, Zheng Z, Yu H, Bao J, Xin Y, Jiang X. Pathogenic mechanisms and latest therapeutic approaches for radiation-induced lung injury: A narrative review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 202:104461. [PMID: 39103129 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
The treatment of thoracic tumors with ionizing radiation can cause radiation-induced lung injury (RILI), which includes radiation pneumonitis and radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Preventing RILI is crucial for controlling tumor growth and improving quality of life. However, the serious adverse effects of traditional RILI treatment methods remain a major obstacle, necessitating the development of novel treatment options that are both safe and effective. This review summarizes the molecular mechanisms of RILI and explores novel treatment options, including natural compounds, gene therapy, nanomaterials, and mesenchymal stem cells. These recent experimental approaches show potential as effective prevention and treatment options for RILI in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sitong Chang
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University and College of Basic Medical Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
| | - Jincai Lv
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University and College of Basic Medical Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China; Key Laboratory of Pathobiology, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
| | - Xuanzhong Wang
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University and College of Basic Medical Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
| | - Jing Su
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University and College of Basic Medical Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
| | - Chenbin Bian
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University and College of Basic Medical Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
| | - Zhuangzhuang Zheng
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University and College of Basic Medical Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
| | - Huiyuan Yu
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University and College of Basic Medical Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
| | - Jindian Bao
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University and College of Basic Medical Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
| | - Ying Xin
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University and College of Basic Medical Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China; Key Laboratory of Pathobiology, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
| | - Xin Jiang
- Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University and College of Basic Medical Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang SX, Yang SH, Zeng B, Li XH. Personalized selection of unequal sub-arc collimator angles in VMAT for multiple brain metastases. Appl Radiat Isot 2024; 214:111513. [PMID: 39276636 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2024.111513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 09/02/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Investigating the effects of unequal sub-arc personalized collimator angle selection on the quality of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans for treating multiple brain metastases. METHODS This study included 21 patients, each with 2-4 target volumes of multiple brain metastases. Two stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) approaches were utilized: sub-arc collimator VMAT (SAC-VMAT) and fixed collimator VMAT (FC-VMAT). In the SAC-VMAT group, multi-leaf collimators (MLC) shaped the target area, dividing the full arc into four unequal sub-arcs under the beam's eye view (BEV). Each sub-arc had an appropriate collimator angle selected to mitigate 'island blocking problems'. Conversely, the FC-VMAT group used a fixed collimator angle of 15° or 345°. A comparative analysis of the dosimetric parameters of the target volumes and normal tissues, along with the monitor units (MU), was conducted between the two groups. RESULTS The mean dose and dose-volume to normal brain tissue (2-26 Gy, with a step of 2 Gy) were significantly lower in the SAC-VMAT group (P < 0.01). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in dose to the target volumes, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and other normal tissues (P > 0.05). Compared with the FA-VMAT group, the SAC-VMAT group significantly reduced the gradient index (GI) (4.5 ± 0.59 vs 5.2 ± 0.75, P < 0.001) and MU (1774.33 ± 181.77 vs 2001.0 ± 344.86, P < 0.001). Notably, with an increase in the number of PTV, the SAC-VMAT group demonstrated more significant improvements in the dose-volume of normal brain tissue, GI, and MU. CONCLUSIONS In this study, personalized selection of the unequal sub-arc collimator angle ensured the prescribed dose to the PTV, CI, and HI, while significantly reducing the GI, MU, and the dose to normal brain tissue in the VMAT plan for multi-target brain metastases in the cohort of cases with 2-4 target volumes. Particularly as the number of targets increase, the advantages of this method become more pronounced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi-Xiong Huang
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital/the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China
| | - Song-Hua Yang
- Department of Clinical Pharmaceutical Research Institution, Hunan Cancer Hospital/the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China
| | - Biao Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital/the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
| | - Xiao-Hua Li
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang SX, Yang SH, Zeng B, Li XH. Optimization of sub-arc collimator angles in volumetric modulated arc therapy: a heatmap-based blocking index approach for multiple brain metastases. Phys Eng Sci Med 2024:10.1007/s13246-024-01477-y. [PMID: 39235667 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-024-01477-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 08/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
To develop and assess an automated Sub-arc Collimator Angle Optimization (SACAO) algorithm and Cumulative Blocking Index Ratio (CBIR) metrics for single-isocenter coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to treat multiple brain metastases. This study included 31 patients with multiple brain metastases, each having 2 to 8 targets. Initially, for each control point, the MLC blocking index was calculated at different collimator angles, resulting in a two-dimensional heatmap. Optimal sub-arc segmentation and collimator angle optimization were achieved using an interval dynamic programming algorithm. Subsequently, VMAT plans were designed using two approaches: SACAO and the conventional Full-Arc Fixed Collimator Angle. CBIR was calculated as the ratio of the cumulative blocking index between the two plan approaches. Finally, dosimetric and planning parameters of both plans were compared. Normal brain tissue, brainstem, and eyes received better protection in the SACAO group (P < 0.05).Query Notable reductions in the SACAO group included 11.47% in gradient index (GI), 15.03% in monitor units (MU), 15.73% in mean control point Jaw area (AJaw,mean), and 19.14% in mean control point Jaw-X width (WJaw-X,mean), all statistically significant (P < 0.001). Furthermore, CBIR showed a strong negative correlation with the degree of plan improvement. The SACAO method enhanced protection of normal organs while improving transmission efficiency and optimization performance of VMAT. In particular, the CBIR metrics show promise in quantifying the differences specifically in the 'island blocking problem' between SACAO and conventional VMAT, and in guiding the enhanced application of the SACAO algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi-Xiong Huang
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University/Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Song-Hua Yang
- Department of Clinical Pharmaceutical Research Institution,Hunan Cancer Hospital/the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Biao Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University/Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
| | - Xiao-Hua Li
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu MZ, Li XY, Gao XS, Lyu F, Ma MW, Chen JY, Gao Y, Ren XY, Li XS. Outcomes of Radical Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Localized Renal Pelvic and Ureteral Carcinoma Intolerant to Surgery: A Real-World Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102216. [PMID: 39326156 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the safety and efficacy of radical radiotherapy for localized inoperable renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma. METHODS 23 patients who received radiotherapy were enrolled. The prescribed dose was 60 to 67.5 Gy in 25 fractions and for bulky tumors, SABR was used in the first 3 to 5 times with tumor center boosted synchronously with 6 to 8 Gy/f. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate local control (LC), DMFS, CSS and OS. Univariate analysis was performed by the log-rank test. The change in the eGFR before and after radiotherapy was compared by paired t test. The side effects were graded by CTCAE, version 5.0. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 17 months. The LC rates at 2 years after radiotherapy were 85.0%; the DMFS rates were 52.2%; the CSS rates were 83.0%; and the OS rates were 77.8%. The main failure mode after radiotherapy was distant metastasis. Univariate analysis revealed that T3-4 stage (P = .001), N+ status (P < .001) and a tumor volume ≥ 20 cc (P = .005) were poor prognostic factors for DMFS. There was no significant difference in the mean eGFR before and after radiotherapy (47.0 mL/min/1.73m2 vs. 48.5 mL/min/1.73m2, P = .632). Only 1 patient developed acute grade 3 anemia. No patients developed grade 3 or higher late toxicities. CONCLUSION For localized inoperable renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma, radiotherapy is well tolerable with high local control and expected to bring survival benefits. In such patients, radiotherapy may be an option when surgery is unsuitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Zhu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Ying Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xian-Shu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Feng Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ming-Wei Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jia-Yan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xue-Ying Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xue-Song Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gardner LL, Thompson SJ, O'Connor JD, McMahon SJ. Modelling radiobiology. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:18TR01. [PMID: 39159658 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad70f0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy has played an essential role in cancer treatment for over a century, and remains one of the best-studied methods of cancer treatment. Because of its close links with the physical sciences, it has been the subject of extensive quantitative mathematical modelling, but a complete understanding of the mechanisms of radiotherapy has remained elusive. In part this is because of the complexity and range of scales involved in radiotherapy-from physical radiation interactions occurring over nanometres to evolution of patient responses over months and years. This review presents the current status and ongoing research in modelling radiotherapy responses across these scales, including basic physical mechanisms of DNA damage, the immediate biological responses this triggers, and genetic- and patient-level determinants of response. Finally, some of the major challenges in this field and potential avenues for future improvements are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia L Gardner
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - Shannon J Thompson
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - John D O'Connor
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
- Ulster University School of Engineering, York Street, Belfast BT15 1AP, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen J McMahon
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ehret F, Rueß D, Blanck O, Fichte S, Chatzikonstantinou G, Wolff R, Mose L, Mose S, Fortmann T, Lehrke R, Turna M, Caglar HB, Mortasawi F, Bleif M, Krug D, Ruge MI, Fürweger C, Muacevic A. Stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy for brainstem metastases: An international multicenter analysis. Int J Cancer 2024; 155:916-924. [PMID: 38720427 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
Brainstem metastases (BSM) present a significant neuro-oncological challenge, resulting in profound neurological deficits and poor survival outcomes. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) offer promising therapeutic avenues for BSM despite their precarious location. This international multicenter study investigates the efficacy and safety of SRS and FSRT in 136 patients with 144 BSM treated at nine institutions from 2005 to 2022. The median radiographic and clinical follow-up periods were 6.8 and 9.4 months, respectively. Predominantly, patients with BSM were managed with SRS (69.4%). The median prescription dose and isodose line for SRS were 18 Gy and 65%, respectively, while for FSRT, the median prescription dose was 21 Gy with a median isodose line of 70%. The 12-, 24-, and 36-month local control (LC) rates were 82.9%, 71.4%, and 61.2%, respectively. Corresponding overall survival rates at these time points were 61.1%, 34.7%, and 19.3%. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis for LC, only the minimum biologically effective dose was significantly associated with LC, favoring higher doses for improved control (in Gy, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86, p < .01). Regarding overall survival, good performance status (Karnofsky performance status, ≥90%; HR: 0.43, p < .01) and prior whole brain radiotherapy (HR: 2.52, p < .01) emerged as associated factors. In 14 BSM (9.7%), treatment-related adverse events were noted, with a total of five (3.4%) radiation necrosis. SRS and FSRT for BSM exhibit efficacy and safety, making them suitable treatment options for affected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Ehret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, a partnership between DKFZ and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Rueß
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein and Saphir Radiosurgery Center Northern Germany, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Georgios Chatzikonstantinou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Robert Wolff
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt and Saphir Radiosurgery Center, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lucas Mose
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Mose
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Schwarzwald-Baar Klinikum, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
| | | | | | - Menekse Turna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze, Turkey
| | - Hale Basak Caglar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze, Turkey
| | | | - Martin Bleif
- RadioChirurgicum, CyberKnife Südwest, Göppingen, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein and Saphir Radiosurgery Center Northern Germany, Kiel, Germany
| | - Maximilian I Ruge
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Fürweger
- European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kahlmeter Brandell J, Valachis A, Ugge H, Smith D, Johansson B. Moderately hypofractionated prostate-only versus whole-pelvis radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer: A retrospective real-world single-center cohort study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 48:100846. [PMID: 39258243 PMCID: PMC11384977 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2024] [Revised: 08/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The benefit of prophylactic whole pelvis radiation therapy (WPRT) in prostate cancer has been debated for decades, with evidence based mainly on conventional fractionation targeting pelvic nodes. Aim This retrospective cohort study aimed to explore the impact of adding moderately hypofractionated pelvic radiotherapy to prostate-only irradiation (PORT) on prognosis, toxicity, and quality of life in real-world settings. Materials and methods Patients with high-risk and conventionally staged prostate cancer (cT1-3N0M0) treated with moderately hypofractionated WPRT or PORT, using external beam radiotherapy alone or combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy, at Örebro University Hospital between 2008 and 2021 were identified. Biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards. Toxicity and quality of life measures were also analysed. Results Among 516 patients (227 PORT, 289 WPRT), 5-year BFFS rates were 77 % (PORT) and 74 % (WPRT), adjusted HR=1.50 (95 % CI=0.88-2.55). No significant differences were found in MFS, PCSS, or OS in main analyses. WPRT was associated with a higher risk of acute grade ≥ 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicities whereas no differences in late toxicities or quality of life between PORT and WPRT were observed. Conclusion We found no significant differences in oncological outcomes or quality of life when comparing moderately hypofractionated PORT to WPRT. Some differences in toxicity patterns were observed. Despite caveats related to study design, our findings support the need for further research on WPRT's impact on treatment-related and patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Kahlmeter Brandell
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Antonis Valachis
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Henrik Ugge
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Daniel Smith
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden
| | - Bengt Johansson
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zwanenburg A, Price G, Löck S. Artificial intelligence for response prediction and personalisation in radiation oncology. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-024-02281-z. [PMID: 39212687 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02281-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems may personalise radiotherapy by assessing complex and multifaceted patient data and predicting tumour and normal tissue responses to radiotherapy. Here we describe three distinct generations of AI systems, namely personalised radiotherapy based on pretreatment data, response-driven radiotherapy and dynamically optimised radiotherapy. Finally, we discuss the main challenges in clinical translation of AI systems for radiotherapy personalisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Zwanenburg
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden (NCT/UCC), Germany:, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Gareth Price
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Fetscherstr. 74, PF 41, 01307, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leung HWC, Wang SY, Lin CL, Chan ALF. Radiation Dose-Induced Carotid Artery Stenosis and Brain Necrosis in Head and Neck Cancer-A Real World Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2982. [PMID: 39272840 PMCID: PMC11394158 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16172982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2024] [Revised: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to examine whether radiation therapy doses are related to incidences of carotid artery stenosis and brain necrosis in a large-scale real-world database. Methods: We identified a cohort of HNC patients from the catastrophic illness patient dataset using ICD-9 or ICD-10 to compare the incidence and risks of carotid artery stenosis (CAS) and brain necrosis (RIBN) in patients who received a radiation therapy dose of ≥5400 cGy/30 fractions (group A) with those who received a radiation therapy dose of <5400 cGy/30 fractions (group B). The incidence and hazard ratios were quantified using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: A total of 19,964 patients were identified in group A and group B. Among them, 965 and 863 cases of CAS and 435 and 359 cases of RIBN were identified in group A and group B, respectively. There was no statistically significant association between the two groups for CAS risk, whereas there was a statistically significant association between the two groups for RIBN risk. The most common primary site of head and neck cancers was the nasopharynx (1144 of 19,964, 5.73%). Conclusions: Our study suggests that RT may increase the risk of carotid stenosis and brain necrosis in patients with NPC. To ensure patient safety during treatment, the optimal balance between tumor control and toxicity prevention in individual patients through minimization of the radiation dose to all relevant OARs must be properly understood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry W C Leung
- An-Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan 709, Taiwan
| | - Shyh-Yau Wang
- An-Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan 709, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Li Lin
- College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - Agnes L F Chan
- Kaohsiung Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 821, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peng K, Zhou D, Sun K, Wang J, Deng J, Gong S. ACSwinNet: A Deep Learning-Based Rigid Registration Method for Head-Neck CT-CBCT Images in Image-Guided Radiotherapy. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:5447. [PMID: 39205140 PMCID: PMC11359988 DOI: 10.3390/s24165447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Revised: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Accurate and precise rigid registration between head-neck computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images is crucial for correcting setup errors in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for head and neck tumors. However, conventional registration methods that treat the head and neck as a single entity may not achieve the necessary accuracy for the head region, which is particularly sensitive to radiation in radiotherapy. We propose ACSwinNet, a deep learning-based method for head-neck CT-CBCT rigid registration, which aims to enhance the registration precision in the head region. Our approach integrates an anatomical constraint encoder with anatomical segmentations of tissues and organs to enhance the accuracy of rigid registration in the head region. We also employ a Swin Transformer-based network for registration in cases with large initial misalignment and a perceptual similarity metric network to address intensity discrepancies and artifacts between the CT and CBCT images. We validate the proposed method using a head-neck CT-CBCT dataset acquired from clinical patients. Compared with the conventional rigid method, our method exhibits lower target registration error (TRE) for landmarks in the head region (reduced from 2.14 ± 0.45 mm to 1.82 ± 0.39 mm), higher dice similarity coefficient (DSC) (increased from 0.743 ± 0.051 to 0.755 ± 0.053), and higher structural similarity index (increased from 0.854 ± 0.044 to 0.870 ± 0.043). Our proposed method effectively addresses the challenge of low registration accuracy in the head region, which has been a limitation of conventional methods. This demonstrates significant potential in improving the accuracy of IGRT for head and neck tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuankuan Peng
- Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology Key National Laboratories, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; (K.P.); (D.Z.); (K.S.); (J.D.)
- Huagong Manufacturing Equipment Digital National Engineering Center Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430074, China
| | - Danyu Zhou
- Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology Key National Laboratories, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; (K.P.); (D.Z.); (K.S.); (J.D.)
| | - Kaiwen Sun
- Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology Key National Laboratories, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; (K.P.); (D.Z.); (K.S.); (J.D.)
| | - Junfeng Wang
- Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Jianchun Deng
- Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology Key National Laboratories, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; (K.P.); (D.Z.); (K.S.); (J.D.)
- Huagong Manufacturing Equipment Digital National Engineering Center Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430074, China
| | - Shihua Gong
- Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology Key National Laboratories, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; (K.P.); (D.Z.); (K.S.); (J.D.)
- Huagong Manufacturing Equipment Digital National Engineering Center Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430074, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Huang HT. Parallel explorations in LA-NSCLC: Chemoradiation dose-response optimisation considering immunotherapy and cardiac toxicity sparing. Radiother Oncol 2024; 200:110477. [PMID: 39153508 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 08/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) has undergone advances, including increased overall survival (OS) when combined with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), and using cardiac-sparing techniques to reduce the radiotoxicity. This research investigated 1) how radiotherapy schedules can be optimised with CRT-ICB schemes, and 2) how cardiac-sparing might change the OS for concurrent CRT (cCRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS Survival data and dosimetric indices were sourced from published studies, with 2-year OS standardised and the hazard ratio of mean heart dose (MHD) against radiotoxicity tabulated in purpose. A published CRT dose-response model was selected, then modified with ICB and cardiac-sparing hypotheses. Models were maximum likelihood fitted, then visualised the prediction outcomes after bootstrapping. RESULTS The modelled 2-year OS rate of cCRT-ICB reached 71 % (95 % confidence intervals, CI 62 %, 84 %) and 66 % (95 % CI: 53 %, 81 %) for stage IIIA and IIIB/C, respectively, given 60 Gy in 2 Gy-per-fraction. 60 Gy in 30 fractions remained the best schedule for cCRT-ICB, whereas modest dose de-escalation to 55 Gy only reduced the OS in 2 %. Sequential CRT (sCRT)-ICB provided 6 % OS increases versus the best OS rate achieved by sCRT alone. Photon MHD-sparing achieved a 5-10 % increase in modelled 2-year OS, with protons providing a further roughly 5-10 % increase. CONCLUSION Neither dose-escalation nor de-escalation relative to 60 Gy in 30 fractions influenced the survival with cCRT-ICB, while 5 Gy dose de-escalation might benefit patients with heavily irradiated organs at risk. Cardiac-sparing improved OS, and protons provided advantages for tumours anatomically overlapped or lay below the heart.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huei-Tyng Huang
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Khaledi N, Karshafian R, Taggar AS, Alrabiah K, Khan R, Gräfe JL. RBE-based dose planning, and calculation of TCP and NTCP with gold nanoparticles for intermediate photon energy in pancreatic cancer. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:175006. [PMID: 39074499 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad68be] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
Objective.This study simulated the potential of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) to improve the effectiveness of radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer cases. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of GNPs on tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) in pancreatic cancer cases undergoing radiation therapy. The work aimed to compare treatment plans generated with a novel 2.5 MV beam using GNPs to conventional 6 MV plans and evaluate the dose-volume histogram (DVH), TCP, and NTCP.Approach.Treatment planning for five pancreatic computed tomography (CT) images was performed using the open-source MATLAB-based treatment planning program matRad. MATLAB codes were developed to calculate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of GNPs and apply the corresponding dose and RBE values to each voxel. TCP and NTCP were calculated based on the applied RBE values.Main results.Adding GNPs to the 2.5 MV treatment plan resulted in a significant increase in TCP, from around 59% to 93.5%, indicating that the inclusion of GNPs improved the effectiveness of the radiation treatment. The range in NTCP without GNPs was relatively larger compared to that with GNPs.Significance.The results indicated that the addition of GNPs to a 2.5 MV plan can increase TCP while maintaining a relatively low NTCP value (<1%). The use of GNPs may also reduce NTCP values by decreasing the dose to normal tissues while maintaining the same prescribed dose to the tumor. Hence, the addition of GNPs can improve the balance between TCP and NTCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navid Khaledi
- Department of Physics, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
- Department of Medical Physics, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Raffi Karshafian
- Department of Physics, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Science and Technology (iBEST), A Partnership Between Toronto Metropolitan University and St. Michael's Hospital, 209 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada
- Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, Unity Health Toronto, 209 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Amandeep S Taggar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Khalid Alrabiah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rao Khan
- Department of Physics, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Howard University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
| | - James L Gräfe
- Department of Physics, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
- Cancer Care Program, Dr H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Center, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu MZ, Chen JY, Lyu F, Gao XS, Ma MW, Li XY, Li HZ, Qin SB, Gao Y, Wang PY. Exploring Radiotherapy as a Promising Alternative for Managing Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Rescuing Chemotherapy-Intolerant Patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102203. [PMID: 39241310 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 08/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the safety and effectiveness of radiotherapy for advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients intolerant to chemotherapy. METHODS Data for 21 patients with advanced UTUC intolerant to chemotherapy were retrospectively collected. All patients were treated with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (50-70 Gy/20-33 f) or partial-SABR boost to the lesions (50-60 Gy/20-25 f with tumor center boosted with 6-8 Gy/f, 3-5 f) for bulky tumors. RESULTS The median age was 75 years (range, 58-87 years). Primary tumor resection was performed for all patients and none underwent metastatic resection. Seventeen (81%) patients had oligometastasis (1-5 metastases) at diagnosis. Eighteen (85.7%) received irradiation to all tumor lesions. Lymph node metastasis was predominant in the whole group (17/21). Other lesions were distributed as local recurrence (7/21), bone metastases (2/21) and abdominal wall/muscle (2/21). The median follow-up time was 38.5 months (interquartile range, 15.2-48.7 months). Rate of local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the whole group at 1 year were 90%, 46.6%, and 80.4%, respectively. At 3 years, LC, PFS and OS were 65.6%, 26.6%, and 40.9%, respectively. Fourteen patients developed acute mild gastrointestinal toxicity, generally of grade 1-2; 8 patients developed acute grade 1-2 hematological toxicity, consisting mainly of anemia and leukopenia. No grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION For patients with advanced UTUC who are not able to tolerate chemotherapy, radiotherapy is a safe treatment and can achieve good local tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Zhu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jia-Yan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xian-Shu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Ming-Wei Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Ying Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Zhen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shang-Bin Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Pei-Yan Wang
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bobić M, Huesa-Berral C, Terry JF, Kunz L, Schuemann J, Fisher DR, Maitz CA, Bertolet A. Monte Carlo dosimetric analyses on the use of 90Y-IsoPet intratumoral therapy in canine subjects. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:165014. [PMID: 39053508 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad67a4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Objective.To investigate different dosimetric aspects of90Y-IsoPet™ intratumoral therapy in canine soft tissue sarcomas, model the spatial spread of the gel post-injection, evaluate absorbed dose to clinical target volumes, and assess dose distributions and treatment efficacy.Approach.Six canine cases treated with90Y-IsoPet™ for soft tissue sarcoma at the Veterinary Health Center, University of Missouri are analyzed in this retrospective study. The dogs received intratumoral IsoPet™ injections, following a grid pattern to achieve a near-uniform dose distribution in the clinical target volume. Two dosimetry methods were performed retrospectively using the Monte Carlo toolkit OpenTOPAS: imaging-based dosimetry obtained from post-injection PET/CT scans, and stylized phantom-based dosimetry modeled from the planned injection points to the gross tumor volume. For the latter, a Gaussian parameter with variable sigma was introduced to reflect the spatial spread of IsoPet™. The two methods were compared using dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and dose homogeneity, allowing an approximation of the closest sigma for the spatial spread of the gel post-injection. In addition, we compared Monte Carlo-based dosimetry with voxel S-value (VSV)-based dosimetry to investigate the dosimetric differences.Main results.Imaging-based dosimetry showed differences between Monte Carlo and VSV calculations in tumor high-density areas with higher self-absorption. Stylized phantom-based dosimetry indicated a more homogeneous target dose with increasing sigma. The sigma approximation of the90Y-IsoPet™ post-injection gel spread resulted in a median sigma of approximately 0.44 mm across all cases to reproduce the dose heterogeneity observed in Monte Carlo calculations.Significance.The results indicate that dose modeling based on planned injection points can serve as a first-order approximation for the delivered dose in90Y-IsoPet™ therapy for canine soft tissue sarcomas. The dosimetry evaluation highlights the non-uniformity of absorbed doses despite the gel spread, emphasizing the importance of considering tumor dose heterogeneity in treatment evaluation. Our findings suggest that using Monte Carlo for dose calculation seems more suitable for this type of tumor where high-density areas might play an important role in dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mislav Bobić
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carlos Huesa-Berral
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jack F Terry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Louis Kunz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Schuemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Darrell R Fisher
- Versant Medical Physics and Radiation Safety, Richland, Washington, and University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America
| | - Charles A Maitz
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States of America
| | - Alejandro Bertolet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aristophanous M, Aliotta E, Lichtenwalner P, Abraham S, Nehmeh M, Caringi A, Zhang P, Hu YC, Zhang P, Cervino L, Gelblum D, McBride S, Riaz N, Chen L, Yu Y, Zakeri K, Lee N. Clinical Experience With an Offline Adaptive Radiation Therapy Head and Neck Program: Dosimetric Benefits and Opportunities for Patient Selection. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:1557-1568. [PMID: 38373657 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to develop a linear accelerator (LINAC)-based adaptive radiation therapy (ART) workflow for the head and neck that is informed by automated image tracking to identify major anatomic changes warranting adaptation. In this study, we report our initial clinical experience with the program and an investigation into potential trigger signals for ART. METHODS AND MATERIALS Offline ART was systematically performed on patients receiving radiation therapy for head and neck cancer on C-arm LINACs. Adaptations were performed at a single time point during treatment with resimulation approximately 3 weeks into treatment. Throughout treatment, all patients were tracked using an automated image tracking system called the Automated Watchdog for Adaptive Radiotherapy Environment (AWARE). AWARE measures volumetric changes in gross tumor volumes (GTVs) and selected normal tissues via cone beam computed tomography scans and deformable registration. The benefit of ART was determined by comparing adaptive plan dosimetry and normal tissue complication probabilities against the initial plans recalculated on resimulation computed tomography scans. Dosimetric differences were then correlated with AWARE-measured volume changes to identify patient-specific triggers for ART. Candidate trigger variables were evaluated using receiver operator characteristic analysis. RESULTS In total, 46 patients received ART in this study. Among these patients, we observed a significant decrease in dose to the submandibular glands (mean ± standard deviation: -219.2 ± 291.2 cGy, P < 10-5), parotids (-68.2 ± 197.7 cGy, P = .001), and oral cavity (-238.7 ± 206.7 cGy, P < 10-5) with the adaptive plan. Normal tissue complication probabilities for xerostomia computed from mean parotid doses also decreased significantly with the adaptive plans (P = .008). We also observed systematic intratreatment volume reductions (ΔV) for GTVs and normal tissues. Candidate triggers were identified that predicted significant improvement with ART, including parotid ΔV = 7%, neck ΔV = 2%, and nodal GTV ΔV = 29%. CONCLUSIONS Systematic offline head and neck ART was successfully deployed on conventional LINACs and reduced doses to critical salivary structures and the oral cavity. Automated cone beam computed tomography tracking provided information regarding anatomic changes that may aid patient-specific triggering for ART.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michalis Aristophanous
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Eric Aliotta
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Phillip Lichtenwalner
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Shira Abraham
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mohammad Nehmeh
- Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Amanda Caringi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yu-Chi Hu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Pengpeng Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Laura Cervino
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daphna Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sean McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yao Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Marquez B, Wooten ZT, Salazar RM, Peterson CB, Fuentes DT, Whitaker TJ, Jhingran A, Pollard-Larkin J, Prajapati S, Beadle B, Cardenas CE, Netherton TJ, Court LE. Analyzing the Relationship between Dose and Geometric Agreement Metrics for Auto-Contouring in Head and Neck Normal Tissues. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1632. [PMID: 39125508 PMCID: PMC11311423 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14151632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the relationship between geometric and dosimetric agreement metrics in head and neck (H&N) cancer radiotherapy plans. A total 287 plans were retrospectively analyzed, comparing auto-contoured and clinically used contours using a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), surface DSC (sDSC), and Hausdorff distance (HD). Organs-at-risk (OARs) with ≥200 cGy dose differences from the clinical contour in terms of Dmax (D0.01cc) and Dmean were further examined against proximity to the planning target volume (PTV). A secondary set of 91 plans from multiple institutions validated these findings. For 4995 contour pairs across 19 OARs, 90% had a DSC, sDSC, and HD of at least 0.75, 0.86, and less than 7.65 mm, respectively. Dosimetrically, the absolute difference between the two contour sets was <200 cGy for 95% of OARs in terms of Dmax and 96% in terms of Dmean. In total, 97% of OARs exhibiting significant dose differences between the clinically edited contour and auto-contour were within 2.5 cm PTV regardless of geometric agreement. There was an approximately linear trend between geometric agreement and identifying at least 200 cGy dose differences, with higher geometric agreement corresponding to a lower fraction of cases being identified. Analysis of the secondary dataset validated these findings. Geometric indices are approximate indicators of contour quality and identify contours exhibiting significant dosimetric discordance. For a small subset of OARs within 2.5 cm of the PTV, geometric agreement metrics can be misleading in terms of contour quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Marquez
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (R.M.S.); (T.J.W.); (J.P.-L.); (L.E.C.)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Ramon M. Salazar
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (R.M.S.); (T.J.W.); (J.P.-L.); (L.E.C.)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Christine B. Peterson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - David T. Fuentes
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - T. J. Whitaker
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (R.M.S.); (T.J.W.); (J.P.-L.); (L.E.C.)
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Julianne Pollard-Larkin
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (R.M.S.); (T.J.W.); (J.P.-L.); (L.E.C.)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Surendra Prajapati
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (R.M.S.); (T.J.W.); (J.P.-L.); (L.E.C.)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Beth Beadle
- Department of Radiation Oncology–Radiation Therapy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;
| | - Carlos E. Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Tucker J. Netherton
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (R.M.S.); (T.J.W.); (J.P.-L.); (L.E.C.)
| | - Laurence E. Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (R.M.S.); (T.J.W.); (J.P.-L.); (L.E.C.)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Li Y, Ke Y, Huang X, Zhang R, Su W, Ma H, He P, Cui X, Huang S. Innovative regression model-based decision support tool for optimizing radiotherapy techniques in thoracic esophageal cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1370293. [PMID: 39114310 PMCID: PMC11303316 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1370293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Modern radiotherapy exemplified by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), has transformed esophageal cancer treatment. Facing challenges in treating thoracic esophageal cancer near vital organs, this study introduces a regression model-based decision support tool for the optimal selection of radiotherapy techniques. Methods We enrolled 106 patients diagnosed with locally advanced thoracic esophageal cancer in this study and designed individualized IMRT and VMAT radiotherapy plans for each patient. Detailed dosimetric analysis was performed to evaluate the differences in dose distribution between the two radiotherapy techniques across various thoracic regions. Single-factor and multifactorial logistic regression analyses were employed to establish predictive models (P1 and P2) and factors such as TLV/PTV ratio. These models were used to predict the compliance and potential advantages of IMRT and VMAT plans. External validation was performed in a validation group of 30 patients. Results Using predictive models, we developed a data-driven decision support tool. For upper thoracic cases, VMAT plans were recommended; for middle/lower thoracic cases, the tool guided VMAT/IMRT choices based on TLV/PTV ratio. Models P1 and P2 assessed IMRT and VMAT compliance. In validation, the tool showed high specificity (90.91%) and sensitivity (78.95%), differentiating IMRT and VMAT plans. Balanced performance in compliance assessment demonstrated tool reliability. Conclusion In summary, our regression model-based decision support tool provides practical guidance for selecting optimal radiotherapy techniques for thoracic esophageal cancer patients. Despite a limited sample size, the tool demonstrates potential clinical benefits, alleviating manual planning burdens and ensuring precise, individualized treatment decisions for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Shan Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chetiyawardana G, Chadwick E, Kordolaimi S, Sundar S. Bladder trigone sparing radiotherapy in prostate cancer treatment. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:1201-1209. [PMID: 38905764 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence suggests the bladder trigone to be a potential organ at risk (OAR) in predicting acute and late genitourinary (GU) side effects when treating prostate cancer with radiotherapy. METHODS A search of MEDLINE, Cinahl, EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and OpenGrey was conducted and no current or underway systematic reviews or scoping reviews on the topic were identified. A systematic literature review was carried out assessing the quality of this evidence. All evidence that prospectively or retrospectively reviewed radiotherapy or modelled radiotherapy dose to the bladder trigone were included. The search was conducted on the 8th July 2021 with 32 studies included in this review. This was repeated 10th June 2023 and two additional studies were identified. Any evidence published since this date have not been included and are a limitation of this review. RESULTS MRI imaging is recommended to assist in delineating the trigone which has been shown to have a high amount of inter-observer variability and the use of specific training may reduce this. Across all radiotherapy treatment modalities, trigone dose contributed to GU acute and late toxicity symptoms. Trigone motion is relative to prostate motion but further research is required to confirm if the prostate can be used as a reliable surrogate for trigone position. The dose tolerance given for specific trigone related toxicities is debated within the literature, and on analysis the authors of this review suggest bladder trigone dose limits: Dmean < 45.8 Gy, V61.0Gy < 40%, V59.8Gy < 25%, V42.5Gy-V41.0Gy < 91% and V47.4Gy-V43.2Gy < 91% with α/β of 3 Gy to reduce acute and late GU toxicities. CONCLUSION There is evidence to support further research into bladder trigone sparing radiotherapy to improve patient outcomes. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE Using the bladder trigone as an organ at risk is possible and the authors are currently seeking funding for a feasibility trial to further investigate this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Chetiyawardana
- Nottingham University Hospitals, City Campus, Radiotherapy, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
| | - E Chadwick
- Nottingham University Hospitals, City Campus, Radiotherapy, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| | - S Kordolaimi
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK
| | - S Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals, City Campus, Radiotherapy, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lund JÅ, Lydersen S, Aksnessæther B, Solberg A, Wanderås A, Lervåg C, Kaasa S, Tøndel H. Image guided radiotherapy in curative treatment for prostate cancer. 5-year results from a randomized controlled trial (RIC-trial). Radiother Oncol 2024; 196:110309. [PMID: 38670265 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Between 2012 and 2015 we conducted a randomized controlled trial in prostate cancer patients comparing weekly 2-D portal imaging versus daily 3-D verification. AIM To evaluate the clinical outcomes of image guided radiotherapy by presenting rectal and urinary side effects, health related quality of life and progression free survival after 5-years follow up of a randomized controlled trial. METHODS We randomized 260 men with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer to weekly 2-D portal imaging with 15 mm margin from CTV to PTV (Arm A) or daily 3-D cone-beam computer tomography with 7 mm margins (Arm B). Prescribed doses were 78 Gy/39 fractions. All patients received hormonal therapy. Primary end point was patient reported bowel symptoms and secondary outcomes were patient reported urinary symptoms, health- related quality of life and progression free survival. RESULTS Of the 216 patients available for analyses at 5 years more than 90 % completed patient reported outcome measures. There were no significant differences between study arms for any single items nor scales evaluating bowel symptoms. There were also no differences in self-reported urinary symptoms nor in health-related quality of life. Symptom scores were low in both study arms. Progression free survival was similar in Arm B as compared to arm A (Hazard ratio 1.01; 95 % CI 0.57 to 1.97). CONCLUSIONS Our results support that both 2-D weekly and 3-D daily image guided radiotherapy are safe and efficient treatments for PC and emphasize the need to evaluate technological progress in clinical trials with long follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo-Åsmund Lund
- Clinic for Cancer Treatment and Rehabilitation, Helse Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Ålesund, Norway.
| | - Stian Lydersen
- Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Bjørg Aksnessæther
- Clinic for Cancer Treatment and Rehabilitation, Helse Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Arne Solberg
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital Trust, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anne Wanderås
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital Trust, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Christoffer Lervåg
- Clinic for Cancer Treatment and Rehabilitation, Helse Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Stein Kaasa
- European Palliative Care Research Centre, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; European Palliative Care Research Centre, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hanne Tøndel
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital Trust, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Romano A, Votta C, Nardini M, Chiloiro G, Panza G, Boldrini L, Cusumano D, Galofaro E, Placidi L, Antonelli MV, Turco G, Autorino R, Gambacorta MA. Uterus motion analysis for radiotherapy planning optimization. The innovative contribution of on-board hybrid MR imaging. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 47:100808. [PMID: 39005509 PMCID: PMC11239475 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Organ motion (OM) and volumetric changes pose challenges in radiotherapy (RT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Magnetic Resonance-guided Radiotherapy (MRgRT) combines improved MRI contrast with adaptive RT plans for daily anatomical changes. Our goal was to analyze cervico-uterine structure (CUS) changes during RT to develop strategies for managing OM. Materials and methods LACC patients received chemoradiation by MRIdian system with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) protocol. Prescription doses of 55-50.6 Gy at PTV1 and 45-39.6 Gy at PTV2 were given in 22 and 25 fractions. Daily MRI scans were co-registered with planning scans and CUS changes were assessed.Six PTVs were created by adding 0.5, 0.7, 1, 1.3, 1.5, and 2 cm margins to the CUS, based on the simulation MRI. Adequate margins were determined to include 95 % of the CUSs throughout the entire treatment in 95 % of patients. Results Analysis of 15 LACC patients and 372 MR scans showed a 31 % median CUS volume decrease. Asymmetric margins of 2 cm cranially, 0.5 cm caudally, 1.5 cm posteriorly, 2 cm anteriorly, and 1.5 cm on both sides were optimal for PTV, adapting to CUS variations. Post-14th fraction, smaller margins of 0.7 cm cranially, 0.5 cm caudally, 1.3 cm posteriorly, 1.3 cm anteriorly, and 1.3 cm on both sides sufficed. Conclusion CUS mobility varies during RT, suggesting reduced PTV margins after the third week. MRgRT with adaptive strategies optimizes dose delivery, emphasizing the importance of streamlined IGRT with reduced PTV margins using a tailored MRgRT workflow with hybrid MRI-guided systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Romano
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Votta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Nardini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giuditta Chiloiro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Panza
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Davide Cusumano
- Mater Olbia Hospital, Strada Statale Orientale Sarda 125, 07026 Olbia, Italy
| | - Elena Galofaro
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Valerio Antonelli
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Turco
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Rosa Autorino
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dalm S, Duan H, Iagaru A. Gastrin Releasing Peptide Receptors-targeted PET Diagnostics and Radionuclide Therapy for Prostate Cancer Management: Preclinical and Clinical Developments of the Past 5 Years. PET Clin 2024; 19:401-415. [PMID: 38644111 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2024.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
Each tumor has its own distinctive molecular identity. Treatment, therefore, should be tailored to this unique cancer phenotype. Theragnostics uses the same compound for targeted imaging and treatment, radiolabeled to an appropriate radionuclide, respectively. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptors (GRPRs) are overexpressed in prostate cancer, and radiolabeled GRPR antagonists have shown high diagnostic performance at staging and biochemical recurrence. Several GRPR-targeting theragnostic compounds have been developed preclinically. Their translation into clinics is underway with 4 clinical trials recruiting participants with GRPR-expressing tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Dalm
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| | - Heying Duan
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, H2200, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, H2200, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Almeida ND, Shekher R, Pepin A, Schrand TV, Goulenko V, Singh AK, Fung-Kee-Fung S. Artificial Intelligence Potential Impact on Resident Physician Education in Radiation Oncology. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101505. [PMID: 38799112 PMCID: PMC11127091 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Neil D. Almeida
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Rohil Shekher
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Abigail Pepin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tyler V. Schrand
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Chemistry, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio
| | - Victor Goulenko
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Anurag K. Singh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Simon Fung-Kee-Fung
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sarwar A, Eminowicz G. Radiotherapy induced ureteric stenosis in locally advanced cervical cancer: A review of current evidence. Brachytherapy 2024; 23:387-396. [PMID: 38643044 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concurrent chemo-radiation followed by high dose rate brachytherapy is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. The proximity of the ureters to the tumor volume risks ureteric stenosis. Here we outline the current understanding of radiotherapy induced ureteric stenosis in patients treated for cervical cancer, focusing on the incidence, risk factors, clinical consequences, and management. METHODS Searches on EMBASE, PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar were performed for publications reporting on radiotherapy, cervix cancer and ureteric stenosis. Multi and single center, prospective/retrospective, cohort, and cross-sectional studies were included. RESULTS This narrative review identified key issues relevant to radiation induced ureteric stenosis in cervical cancer in the literature. Thirteen studies were evaluated, identifying crude and actuarial rates of ureteric stenosis of 0.3-13.5% and 1.5-4.4% (at 5 years) respectively. The risk of ureteric stenosis is highest in the first 5 years after radiotherapy but continues to occur at a rate of 0.15% per year. Risk factors including advanced FIGO stage, tumor size >5 cm and baseline hydronephrosis increase the incidence of ureteric stenosis. EQD2 doses of ≥ 77Gy were significantly associated with ≥grade 3 ureteric morbidity. The majority of patients were managed with nephrostomy +/- ureteric stent insertion, with some requiring ureteral reimplantation, urinary diversion or nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS This review has identified multiple considerations, highlighting the need to identify patients highest at risk of ureteric stenosis. There is also a need to recognize ureters as organs at risk, record dose exposure, and apply dose constraints, all of which set the landscape for allowing dose optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asma Sarwar
- University College London Hospitals, London, UK; University College London, London, UK.
| | - Gemma Eminowicz
- University College London Hospitals, London, UK; University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fleury E, Pignol JP, Kiliç E, Milder M, van Rij C, Naus N, Yavuzyigitoglu S, den Toom W, Zolnay A, Spruijt K, van Vulpen M, Trnková P, Hoogeman M. Comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and protons for uveal melanoma patients. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100605. [PMID: 39050744 PMCID: PMC11268348 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular malignancy. We compared fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with proton therapy, including toxicity risks for UM patients. Materials and methods For a total of 66 UM patients from a single center, SRT dose distributions were compared to protons using the same planning CT. Fourteen dose-volume parameters were compared in 2-Gy equivalent dose per fraction (EQD2). Four toxicity profiles were evaluated: maculopathy, optic-neuropathy, visual acuity impairment (Profile I); neovascular glaucoma (Profile II); radiation-induced retinopathy (Profile III); and dry-eye syndrome (Profile IV). For Profile III, retina Mercator maps were generated to visualize the geographical location of dose differences. Results In 9/66 cases, (14 %) proton plans were superior for all dose-volume parameters. Higher T stages benefited more from protons in Profile I, especially tumors located within 3 mm or less from the optic nerve. In Profile II, only 9/66 cases resulted in a better proton plan. In Profile III, better retina volume sparing was always achievable with protons, with a larger gain for T3 tumors. In Profile IV, protons always reduced the risk of toxicity with a median RBE-weighted EQD2 reduction of 15.3 Gy. Conclusions This study reports the first side-by-side imaging-based planning comparison between protons and SRT for UM patients. Globally, while protons appear almost always better regarding the risk of optic-neuropathy, retinopathy and dry-eye syndrome, for other toxicity like neovascular glaucoma, a plan comparison is warranted. Choice would depend on the prioritization of risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Fleury
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emine Kiliç
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike Milder
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline van Rij
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Naus
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wilhelm den Toom
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andras Zolnay
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Petra Trnková
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Li Y, Guan X, Hu C. Impact of dose volume parameters and clinical characteristics on radiation-induced acute oral mucositis for head and neck cancer patients treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy dose volume outcome analysis. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-024-02255-1. [PMID: 38926185 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02255-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the predictive value of different dosimetric parameters for acute radiation oral mucositis (ROM) in head and neck cancer (HNCs) patients treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT). METHODS 44 patients with HNCs treated with CIRT were evaluated for acute ROM which was defined as severe when the score ≥3 (acute ROM was scored prospectively using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) score system). Predictive dosimetric factors were identified by using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Male gender, weight loss >5%, and total dose/fractions were related factors to severe ROM. In multivariate analysis, grade ≥3 ROM was significantly related to the Dmax, D10, D15, and D20 (P < 0.05, respectively). As the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve shows, the area under the curve (AUC) for D10 was 0.77 (p = 0.003), and the cutoff value was 51.06 Gy (RBE); The AUC for D15 was 0.75 (p = 0.006), and the cutoff value was 42.82 Gy (RBE); The AUC for D20 was 0.74 (p = 0.009), and the cutoff value was 30.45 Gy (RBE); The AUC for Dmax was 0.81 (p < 0.001), and the cutoff value was 69.33 Gy (RBE). CONCLUSION Male gender, weight loss, and total dose/fractions were significantly association with ROM. Dmax, D10, D15 and D20 were identified as the most valuable predictor and we suggest a Dmax limit of 69.33 Gy (RBE), D10 limit of 51.06 Gy (RBE), D15 limit of 42.82 Gy (RBE), and D20 limit of 30.45 Gy (RBE) and for oral mucosa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujiao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiyin Guan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Chaosu Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, 4365 Kangxin Rd, Pudong, 201321, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kiafi P, Kouri MA, Patatoukas G, Kougioumtzopoulou A, Chalkia M, Nicolatou-Galitis O, Kouloulias V, Kyrodimos E, Platoni K. Unravelling Quality of Life for Head and Neck Cancer Patients after VMAT Radiation Therapy: Insights from Toxicity, Dosimetry and Symptoms Correlation. Clin Pract 2024; 14:1085-1099. [PMID: 38921264 PMCID: PMC11202948 DOI: 10.3390/clinpract14030086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Head and neck cancer treatment, including advanced techniques like Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), presents challenges for maintaining patient quality of life (QoL). Thus, thoroughly investigating how radiation therapy (RT) affects patients has been proved essential. Derived by that, this study aims to understand the complex interactions between not only RT and QoL but also symptom severity, and treatment-related toxicities in three distinct time points of patient's treatment; (2) Methods: To achieve that, EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires were used in combination with EORTC_RTOG scoring criteria and Spearman's rho statistical analysis for 74 patients with cancer undergoing VMAT radiation therapy; (3) Results: The results revealed a significant improvement in the Overall Health Index post-treatment, indicating a temporary decline during therapy followed by subsequent recovery, often surpassing pre-treatment QoL levels. Concurrently a reduction in symptomatology was observed, notably in pain, swallowing difficulties, and dry mouth, aligning with prior research indicating decreased symptom burden post-treatment. However, Spearman's correlation coefficient analysis at two distinct time points during therapy uncovered varying degrees of correlation between dosimetric data at Organs at Risk (OARs) and reported symptoms, highlighting potential limitations in using QoL questionnaires as sole indicators of treatment efficacy. Our investigation into the correlation between dosimetric data, toxicity, and symptoms focused on the relationship between radiation doses and oral mucositis levels, a common toxicity in head and neck cancer patients. Significant associations were identified between toxicity levels and dosimetric parameters, particularly with OARs such as the parotid glands, oral cavity, and swallowing muscles, underlining the utility of the EORTC method as a reliable toxicity assessment tool; (4) Conclusions: To summarize, current research attempts to underscore the importance of refining QoL assessments for enhanced patient care. The integration of dosimetric data, symptom severity, and treatment-related toxicities in the QoL outcomes of head and neck cancer patients undergoing VMAT radiation therapy, can lead towards the optimization of treatment strategies and the improvement of patient outcomes in future patient-centered radiation therapy practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiota Kiafi
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.K.); (G.P.); (A.K.); (M.C.); (V.K.)
| | - Maria Anthi Kouri
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.K.); (G.P.); (A.K.); (M.C.); (V.K.)
| | - Georgios Patatoukas
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.K.); (G.P.); (A.K.); (M.C.); (V.K.)
| | - Andromachi Kougioumtzopoulou
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.K.); (G.P.); (A.K.); (M.C.); (V.K.)
| | - Marina Chalkia
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.K.); (G.P.); (A.K.); (M.C.); (V.K.)
| | - Ourania Nicolatou-Galitis
- Oral Oncology Unit, Clinic of Hospital Dentistry, Dental School, University of Athens, Bouboulinas 41, N. Psyhico, 15451 Athens, Greece;
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.K.); (G.P.); (A.K.); (M.C.); (V.K.)
| | - Efthimios Kyrodimos
- 2nd Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital, University of Athens, 15451 Athens, Greece;
| | - Kalliopi Platoni
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.K.); (G.P.); (A.K.); (M.C.); (V.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Constine LS, Olch AJ, Jackson A, Hua CH, Ronckers CM, Milano MT, Marcus KJ, Yorke E, Hodgson DC, Howell RM, Hudson MM, Williams JP, Marples B, C M Kremer L, Marks LB, Bentzen SM. Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC): An International Collaboration to Assess Normal Tissue Radiation Dose-Volume-Response Relationships for Children With Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:316-320. [PMID: 33810949 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; Department of Pediatrics, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Radiation Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Chia-Ho Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Cecile M Ronckers
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Brandenberg Medical School, Theodor Fontane Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Karen J Marcus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorder's Center, Boston, MA
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David C Hodgson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rebecca M Howell
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Melissa M Hudson
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Jacqueline P Williams
- Environmental Medicine and Radiation Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Brian Marples
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gullhaug A, Haakensen VD, De Ruysscher D, Simone CB, Hotca-Cho AE, Chhabra AM, Hellebust TP, Paulsen EE, Dimopoulos MP, Johansen S. Lung cancer reirradiation: Exploring modifications to utilization, treatment modalities and factors associated with outcomes. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2024; 55:221-231. [PMID: 38429174 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients treated for lung cancer (LC) often experience locoregional failure after initial treatment. Due to technological advances, thoracic reirradiation (re-RT) has become a viable treatment option. We sought to investigate the use of thoracic re-RT in LC patients over a time period characterized by technological advances in a large, multi-center cohort. METHODS AND MATERIALS LC patients treated with thoracic re-RT in two University Hospitals from 2010-2020 were identified. Clinical variables and RT data were extracted from the medical records and treatment planning systems. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the last day of re-RT until death or last follow up. RESULTS 296 patients (small cell LC n=30, non-small cell LC n=266) were included. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy was the RT technique used most frequently (63%), and 86% of all patients were referred for re-RT with palliative treatment intent. During the second half of the study period, the use of thoracic re-RT increased in general, more patients received curative re-RT, and there was an increased use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Median time between initial RT and re-RT was 18 months (range 1-213 months). Only 83/296 patients had combined treatment plans that allowed for registration of combined doses to organs at risk (OAR). Most of the combined doses to OAR were below recommendations from guidelines. Multivariate analysis showed superior OS (p<0.05) in patients treated with curative intent, SBRT or intensity modulated radiation therapy or had excellent performance status prior to re-RT. CONCLUSIONS The use of re-RT increased in the second half of the study period, although 2020 did not follow the trend. The use of SBRT and IMRT became more frequent over the years, yet the majority received palliative re-RT. Combined dose plans were only created for one third of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gullhaug
- Department of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Vilde D Haakensen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, the Netherlands
| | - Charles B Simone
- New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexandra E Hotca-Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | | | - Taran P Hellebust
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Erna E Paulsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway; Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | - Maria P Dimopoulos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Safora Johansen
- Department of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Singapore institute of Technology, Health and Social Sciences, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ghosh Laskar S, Sinha S, Kumar A, Samanta A, Mohanty S, Kale S, Khan F, Lewis Salins S, Murthy V. Reducing Salivary Toxicity with Adaptive Radiotherapy (ReSTART): A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Conventional IMRT to Adaptive IMRT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:353-361. [PMID: 38575432 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utility of Adaptive Radiotherapy (ART) in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) remains to be ascertained. While multiple retrospective and single-arm prospective studies have demonstrated its efficacy in decreasing parotid doses and reducing xerostomia, adequate randomized evidence is lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS ReSTART (Reducing Salivary Toxicity with Adaptive Radiotherapy) is an ongoing phase III randomized trial of patients with previously untreated, locally advanced HNSCC of the oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the standard Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) arm {Planning Target Volume (PTV) margin 5 mm} vs. Adaptive Radiotherapy arm (standard IMRT with a PTV margin 3 mm, two planned adaptive planning at 10th and 20th fractions). The stratification factors include the primary site and nodal stage. The RT dose prescribed is 66Gy in 30 fractions for high-risk PTV and 54Gy in 30 fractions for low-risk PTV over six weeks, along with concurrent chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is to compare salivary toxicity between arms using salivary scintigraphy 12 months' post-radiation. To detect a 25% improvement in the primary endpoint at 12 months in the ART arm with a two-sided 5% alpha value and a power of 80% (and 10% attrition ratio), a sample size of 130 patients is required (65 patients in each arm). The secondary endpoints include acute and late toxicities, locoregional control, disease-free survival, overall survival, quality of life, and xerostomia scores between the two arms. DISCUSSION The ReSTART trial aims to answer an important question in Radiation Therapy for HNSCC, particularly in a resource-limited setting. The uniqueness of this trial, compared to other ongoing randomized trials, includes the PTV margins and the xerostomia assessment by scintigraphy at 12 months as the primary endpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ghosh Laskar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - S Sinha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - A Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - A Samanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - S Mohanty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - S Kale
- Department of Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - F Khan
- Clinical Research Secretariat (CRS), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - S Lewis Salins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India.
| | - V Murthy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chen ZJ, Li XA, Brenner DJ, Hellebust TP, Hoskin P, Joiner MC, Kirisits C, Nath R, Rivard MJ, Thomadsen BR, Zaider M. AAPM Task Group Report 267: A joint AAPM GEC-ESTRO report on biophysical models and tools for the planning and evaluation of brachytherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:3850-3923. [PMID: 38721942 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Brachytherapy utilizes a multitude of radioactive sources and treatment techniques that often exhibit widely different spatial and temporal dose delivery patterns. Biophysical models, capable of modeling the key interacting effects of dose delivery patterns with the underlying cellular processes of the irradiated tissues, can be a potentially useful tool for elucidating the radiobiological effects of complex brachytherapy dose delivery patterns and for comparing their relative clinical effectiveness. While the biophysical models have been used largely in research settings by experts, it has also been used increasingly by clinical medical physicists over the last two decades. A good understanding of the potentials and limitations of the biophysical models and their intended use is critically important in the widespread use of these models. To facilitate meaningful and consistent use of biophysical models in brachytherapy, Task Group 267 (TG-267) was formed jointly with the American Association of Physics in Medicine (AAPM) and The Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) to review the existing biophysical models, model parameters, and their use in selected brachytherapy modalities and to develop practice guidelines for clinical medical physicists regarding the selection, use, and interpretation of biophysical models. The report provides an overview of the clinical background and the rationale for the development of biophysical models in radiation oncology and, particularly, in brachytherapy; a summary of the results of literature review of the existing biophysical models that have been used in brachytherapy; a focused discussion of the applications of relevant biophysical models for five selected brachytherapy modalities; and the task group recommendations on the use, reporting, and implementation of biophysical models for brachytherapy treatment planning and evaluation. The report concludes with discussions on the challenges and opportunities in using biophysical models for brachytherapy and with an outlook for future developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Jay Chen
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - X Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - David J Brenner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Taran P Hellebust
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Center, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael C Joiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Christian Kirisits
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ravinder Nath
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Mark J Rivard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Bruce R Thomadsen
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Marco Zaider
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Vicente EM, Grande Gutierrez N, Oakes JM, Cammin J, Gopal A, Kipritidis J, Modiri A, Mossahebi S, Mohindra P, Citron WK, Matuszak MM, Timmerman R, Sawant A. Integrating local and distant radiation-induced lung injury: Development and validation of a predictive model for ventilation loss. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 38820385 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Investigations on radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) have predominantly focused on local effects, primarily those associated with radiation damage to lung parenchyma. However, recent studies from our group and others have revealed that radiation-induced damage to branching serial structures such as airways and vessels may also have a substantial impact on post-radiotherapy (RT) lung function. Furthermore, recent results from multiple functional lung avoidance RT trials, although promising, have demonstrated only modest toxicity reduction, likely because they were primarily focused on dose avoidance to lung parenchyma. These observations emphasize the critical need for predictive dose-response models that effectively incorporate both local and distant RILI effects. PURPOSE We develop and validate a predictive model for ventilation loss after lung RT. This model, referred to as P+A, integrates local (parenchyma [P]) and distant (central and peripheral airways [A]) radiation-induced damage, modeling partial (narrowing) and complete (collapse) obstruction of airways. METHODS In an IRB-approved prospective study, pre-RT breath-hold CTs (BHCTs) and pre- and one-year post-RT 4DCTs were acquired from lung cancer patients treated with definitive RT. Up to 13 generations of airways were automatically segmented on the BHCTs using a research virtual bronchoscopy software. Ventilation maps derived from the 4DCT scans were utilized to quantify pre- and post-RT ventilation, serving, respectively, as input data and reference standard (RS) in model validation. To predict ventilation loss solely due to parenchymal damage (referred to as P model), we used a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model. Our model used this NTCP-based estimate and predicted additional loss due radiation-induced partial or complete occlusion of individual airways, applying fluid dynamics principles and a refined version of our previously developed airway radiosensitivity model. Predictions of post-RT ventilation were estimated in the sublobar volumes (SLVs) connected to the terminal airways. To validate the model, we conducted a k-fold cross-validation. Model parameters were optimized as the values that provided the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) between predicted post-RT ventilation and the RS for all SLVs in the training data. The performance of the P+A and the P models was evaluated by comparing their respective post-RT ventilation values with the RS predictions. Additional evaluation using various receiver operating characteristic (ROC) metrics was also performed. RESULTS We extracted a dataset of 560 SLVs from four enrolled patients. Our results demonstrated that the P+A model consistently outperformed the P model, exhibiting RMSEs that were nearly half as low across all patients (13 ± 3 percentile for the P+A model vs. 24 ± 3 percentile for the P model on average). Notably, the P+A model aligned closely with the RS in ventilation loss distributions per lobe, particularly in regions exposed to doses ≥13.5 Gy. The ROC analysis further supported the superior performance of the P+A model compared to the P model in sensitivity (0.98 vs. 0.07), accuracy (0.87 vs. 0.25), and balanced predictions. CONCLUSIONS These early findings indicate that airway damage is a crucial factor in RILI that should be included in dose-response modeling to enhance predictions of post-RT lung function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther M Vicente
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Noelia Grande Gutierrez
- Mechanical Engineering Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jessica M Oakes
- Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jochen Cammin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Arun Gopal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - John Kipritidis
- Department of Radiotherapy, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Arezoo Modiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sina Mossahebi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Wendla K Citron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Martha M Matuszak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Amit Sawant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hoeltgen L, Meixner E, Hoegen-Saßmannshausen P, Kim JY, Deng M, Seidensaal K, Held T, Herfarth K, Haberer T, Debus J, Mairani A, Harrabi S, Tessonnier T. Helium Ion Therapy for Advanced Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibroma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1993. [PMID: 38893114 PMCID: PMC11171253 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16111993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Helium ion therapy (HRT) is a promising modality for the treatment of pediatric tumors and those located close to critical structures due to the favorable biophysical properties of helium ions. This in silico study aimed to explore the potential benefits of HRT in advanced juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) compared to proton therapy (PRT). We assessed 11 consecutive patients previously treated with PRT for JNA in a definitive or postoperative setting with a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) weighted dose of 45 Gy (RBE) in 25 fractions at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center. HRT plans were designed retrospectively for dosimetric comparisons and risk assessments of radiation-induced complications. HRT led to enhanced target coverage in all patients, along with sparing of critical organs at risk, including a reduction in the brain integral dose by approximately 27%. In terms of estimated risks of radiation-induced complications, HRT led to a reduction in ocular toxicity, cataract development, xerostomia, tinnitus, alopecia and delayed recall. Similarly, HRT led to reduced estimated risks of radiation-induced secondary neoplasms, with a mean excess absolute risk reduction of approximately 30% for secondary CNS malignancies. HRT is a promising modality for advanced JNA, with the potential for enhanced sparing of healthy tissue and thus reduced radiation-induced acute and long-term complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ji-Young Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Partner Site, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO), Medical Physics Department, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Saadatmand P, Mahdavi SR, Nikoofar A, Jazaeri SZ, Ramandi FL, Esmaili G, Vejdani S. A dosiomics model for prediction of radiation-induced acute skin toxicity in breast cancer patients: machine learning-based study for a closed bore linac. Eur J Med Res 2024; 29:282. [PMID: 38735974 PMCID: PMC11089719 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-01855-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation induced acute skin toxicity (AST) is considered as a common side effect of breast radiation therapy. The goal of this study was to design dosiomics-based machine learning (ML) models for prediction of AST, to enable creating optimized treatment plans for high-risk individuals. METHODS Dosiomics features extracted using Pyradiomics tool (v3.0.1), along with treatment plan-derived dose volume histograms (DVHs), and patient-specific treatment-related (PTR) data of breast cancer patients were used for modeling. Clinical scoring was done using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) V4.0 criteria for skin-specific symptoms. The 52 breast cancer patients were grouped into AST 2 + (CTCAE ≥ 2) and AST 2 - (CTCAE < 2) toxicity grades to facilitate AST modeling. They were randomly divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) cohorts. Multiple prediction models were assessed through multivariate analysis, incorporating different combinations of feature groups (dosiomics, DVH, and PTR) individually and collectively. In total, seven unique combinations, along with seven classification algorithms, were considered after feature selection. The performance of each model was evaluated on the test group using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and f1-score. Accuracy, precision, and recall of each model were also studied. Statistical analysis involved features differences between AST 2 - and AST 2 + groups and cutoff value calculations. RESULTS Results showed that 44% of the patients developed AST 2 + after Tomotherapy. The dosiomics (DOS) model, developed using dosiomics features, exhibited a noteworthy improvement in AUC (up to 0.78), when spatial information is preserved in the dose distribution, compared to DVH features (up to 0.71). Furthermore, a baseline ML model created using only PTR features for comparison with DOS models showed the significance of dosiomics in early AST prediction. By employing the Extra Tree (ET) classifiers, the DOS + DVH + PTR model achieved a statistically significant improved performance in terms of AUC (0.83; 95% CI 0.71-0.90), accuracy (0.70), precision (0.74) and sensitivity (0.72) compared to other models. CONCLUSIONS This study confirmed the benefit of dosiomics-based ML in the prediction of AST. However, the combination of dosiomics, DVH, and PTR yields significant improvement in AST prediction. The results of this study provide the opportunity for timely interventions to prevent the occurrence of radiation induced AST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pegah Saadatmand
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seied Rabi Mahdavi
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
- Radiation Biology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Alireza Nikoofar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyede Zohreh Jazaeri
- Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Division of NeuroscienceCellular and Molecular Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | | | - Soheil Vejdani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chirilă ME, Kraja F, Marta GN, Neves Junior WFP, de Arruda GV, Gouveia AG, Franco P, Poortmans P, Ratosa I. Organ-sparing techniques and dose-volume constrains used in breast cancer radiation therapy - Results from European and Latin American surveys. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100752. [PMID: 38425691 PMCID: PMC10900109 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Advances in local and systemic therapies have improved the outcomes of patients with breast cancer (BC), leading to a possible increased risk for postoperative radiation therapy (RT) late adverse events. The most adequate technologies and dose constraints for organs at risk (OAR) in BC RT have yet to be defined. Methods An online survey was distributed to radiation oncologists (ROs) practicing in Europe and Latin America including the Caribbean (LAC) through personal contacts, RO and BC professional groups' networks. Demographic data and clinical practice information were collected. Results The study included 585 responses from ROs practicing in 57 different countries. The most frequently contoured OAR by European and LAC participants were the whole heart (96.6 % and 97.7 %), the ipsilateral (84.3 % and 90.8 %), and contralateral lung (71.3 % and 77.4 %), whole lung (69.8 % and 72.9 %), and the contralateral breast (66.4 % and. 83.2 %). ESTRO guidelines were preferred in Europe (33.3 %) and the RTOG contouring guideline was the most popular in LAC (62.2 %), while some participants used both recommendations (13.2 % and 19.2 %). IMRT (68.6 % and 59.1 %) and VMAT (65.6 % and 60.2 %) were the preferred modalities used in heart sparing strategies, followed by deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) (54.8 % and 37.4 %) and partial breast irradiation (PBI) (41.6 % and 24.6 %). Only a small percentage of all ROs reported the dose-volume constraints for OAR used in routine clinical practice. A mean heart dose (Heart-Dmean) between 4 and 5 Gy was the most frequently reported parameter (17.2 % and 39.3 %). Conclusion The delineation approaches and sparing techniques for OAR in BC RT vary between ROs worldwide. The low response rate to the dose constraints subset of queries reflects the uncertainty surrounding this topic and supports the need for detailed consensus recommendations in the clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica-Emila Chirilă
- Radiation Oncology Department, Amethyst Radiotherapy Centre, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Clinical Development, MVision AI, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Fatjona Kraja
- Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine Tirana, Albania
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre Mother Teresa, Tirana, Albania
| | - Gustavo Nader Marta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sirio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Post-Graduation Program, Radiology and Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Wellington Furtado Pimenta Neves Junior
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Sirio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
- Post-Graduation Program, Radiology and Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gustavo Viani de Arruda
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Department of Medical Imaging, Hematology and Oncology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - André Guimarães Gouveia
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Sciences (DIMET), University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ivica Ratosa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rong Y, Chen Q, Fu Y, Yang X, Al-Hallaq HA, Wu QJ, Yuan L, Xiao Y, Cai B, Latifi K, Benedict SH, Buchsbaum JC, Qi XS. NRG Oncology Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Deep Learning-Based Auto-segmentation for Radiation Therapy: Current Developments, Clinical Considerations, and Future Directions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:261-280. [PMID: 37972715 PMCID: PMC11023777 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Deep learning neural networks (DLNN) in Artificial intelligence (AI) have been extensively explored for automatic segmentation in radiotherapy (RT). In contrast to traditional model-based methods, data-driven AI-based models for auto-segmentation have shown high accuracy in early studies in research settings and controlled environment (single institution). Vendor-provided commercial AI models are made available as part of the integrated treatment planning system (TPS) or as a stand-alone tool that provides streamlined workflow interacting with the main TPS. These commercial tools have drawn clinics' attention thanks to their significant benefit in reducing the workload from manual contouring and shortening the duration of treatment planning. However, challenges occur when applying these commercial AI-based segmentation models to diverse clinical scenarios, particularly in uncontrolled environments. Contouring nomenclature and guideline standardization has been the main task undertaken by the NRG Oncology. AI auto-segmentation holds the potential clinical trial participants to reduce interobserver variations, nomenclature non-compliance, and contouring guideline deviations. Meanwhile, trial reviewers could use AI tools to verify contour accuracy and compliance of those submitted datasets. In recognizing the growing clinical utilization and potential of these commercial AI auto-segmentation tools, NRG Oncology has formed a working group to evaluate the clinical utilization and potential of commercial AI auto-segmentation tools. The group will assess in-house and commercially available AI models, evaluation metrics, clinical challenges, and limitations, as well as future developments in addressing these challenges. General recommendations are made in terms of the implementation of these commercial AI models, as well as precautions in recognizing the challenges and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Rong
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Quan Chen
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Duarte, CA
| | - Yabo Fu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Commack, NY
| | | | | | | | - Lulin Yuan
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Ying Xiao
- University of Pennsylvania/Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Bin Cai
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Stanley H Benedict
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | | | - X Sharon Qi
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hahnemann L, Krämer A, Fink C, Jungk C, Thomas M, Christopoulos P, Lischalk J, Meis J, Hörner-Rieber J, Eichkorn T, Deng M, Lang K, Paul A, Meixner E, Weykamp F, Debus J, König L. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of intracranial postoperative cavities after resection of brain metastases - Clinical outcome and prognostic factors. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 46:100782. [PMID: 38694237 PMCID: PMC11061678 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose After surgical resection of brain metastases (BM), radiotherapy (RT) is indicated. Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) reduces the risk of local progression and neurocognitive decline compared to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Aside from the optimal dose and fractionation, little is known about the combination of systemic therapy and postoperative fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT), especially regarding tumour control and toxicity. Methods In this study, 105 patients receiving postoperative fSRT with 35 Gy in 7 fractions performed with Cyberknife were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and total intracranial brain control (TIBC) were analysed via Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors. Results Median follow-up was 20.8 months. One-year TIBC was 61.6% and one-year LC was 98.6%. Median OS was 28.7 (95%-CI: 16.9-40.5) months. In total, local progression (median time not reached) occurred in 2.0% and in 20.4% radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) of the cavity (after median of 14.3 months) were diagnosed. Absence of extracranial metastases was identified as an independent prognostic factor for superior OS (p = <0.001) in multivariate analyses, while a higher Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was predictive for longer OS in univariate analysis (p = 0.041). Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) developed in 13% of patients. Conclusion FSRT after surgical resection of BM is an effective and safe treatment approach with excellent local control and acceptable toxicity. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to establish standardized therapeutic guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Hahnemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A. Krämer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - C. Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C. Jungk
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M. Thomas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik and National Center for Tumor Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - P. Christopoulos
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik and National Center for Tumor Diseases at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany
| | - J.W. Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Health at Long Island, New York, NY, USA
| | - J. Meis
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J. Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T. Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M. Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K. Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A. Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - E. Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F. Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J. Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L. König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Deng MY, da Silva AS, Göller PC, König L, Schäfer H, Maire C, Lentz-Hommertgen A, Held T, Regnery S, Eichkorn T, Stritzke F, Bauer L, Schnell D, Herfarth K, von Deimling A, Krieg S, Wick A, Wick W, Grosu A, Debus J, Sahm F, Ricklefs F. Plasma extracellular vesicles in meningioma patients following radiotherapy as liquid biopsy- a prospective explorative biomarker study (ARO 2023-05/AG-NRO-07). BMC Cancer 2024; 24:449. [PMID: 38605332 PMCID: PMC11007956 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12170-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While surgical resection remains the primary treatment approach for symptomatic or growing meningiomas, radiotherapy represents an auspicious alternative in patients with meningiomas not safely amenable to surgery. Biopsies are often omitted in light of potential postoperative neurological deficits, resulting in a lack of histological grading and (molecular) risk stratification. In this prospective explorative biomarker study, extracellular vesicles in the bloodstream will be investigated in patients with macroscopic meningiomas to identify a biomarker for molecular risk stratification and disease monitoring. METHODS In total, 60 patients with meningiomas and an indication of radiotherapy (RT) and macroscopic tumor on the planning MRI will be enrolled. Blood samples will be obtained before the start, during, and after radiotherapy, as well as during clinical follow-up every 6 months. Extracellular vesicles will be isolated from the blood samples, quantified and correlated with the clinical treatment response or progression. Further, nanopore sequencing-based DNA methylation profiles of plasma EV-DNA will be generated for methylation-based meningioma classification. DISCUSSION This study will explore the dynamic of plasma EVs in meningioma patients under/after radiotherapy, with the objective of identifying potential biomarkers of (early) tumor progression. DNA methylation profiling of plasma EVs in meningioma patients may enable molecular risk stratification, facilitating a molecularly-guided target volume delineation and adjusted dose prescription during RT treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Y Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | - Pauline Carlotta Göller
- Department of Neuropathology, CCU Neuropathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Henning Schäfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Cecile Maire
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Adriane Lentz-Hommertgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Stritzke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Bauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Schnell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas von Deimling
- Department of Neuropathology, CCU Neuropathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sandro Krieg
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antje Wick
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) and National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), NCT Heidelberg, a partnership between DKFZ and Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, CCU Neuropathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Franz Ricklefs
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Fijardo M, Kwan JYY, Bissey PA, Citrin DE, Yip KW, Liu FF. The clinical manifestations and molecular pathogenesis of radiation fibrosis. EBioMedicine 2024; 103:105089. [PMID: 38579363 PMCID: PMC11002813 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Advances in radiation techniques have enabled the precise delivery of higher doses of radiotherapy to tumours, while sparing surrounding healthy tissues. Consequently, the incidence of radiation toxicities has declined, and will likely continue to improve as radiotherapy further evolves. Nonetheless, ionizing radiation elicits tissue-specific toxicities that gradually develop into radiation-induced fibrosis, a common long-term side-effect of radiotherapy. Radiation fibrosis is characterized by an aberrant wound repair process, which promotes the deposition of extensive scar tissue, clinically manifesting as a loss of elasticity, tissue thickening, and organ-specific functional consequences. In addition to improving the existing technologies and guidelines directing the administration of radiotherapy, understanding the pathogenesis underlying radiation fibrosis is essential for the success of cancer treatments. This review integrates the principles for radiotherapy dosimetry to minimize off-target effects, the tissue-specific clinical manifestations, the key cellular and molecular drivers of radiation fibrosis, and emerging therapeutic opportunities for both prevention and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzie Fijardo
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer Yin Yee Kwan
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Deborah E Citrin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Kenneth W Yip
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fei-Fei Liu
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Nisha A, C S, Nagesh J, Nair SS. Comparison between Volumetric Modulated arc Therapy based Coplanar and Noncoplanar Planning for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Liver. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2024; 25:1383-1390. [PMID: 38680000 PMCID: PMC11162725 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2024.25.4.1383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study aims to investigate potential dosimetric benefits between non-coplanar and coplanar beam arrangements of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans for liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS Thirteen patients who had undergone liver SBRT treatment in our department were chosen retrospectively for the study. Two sets of SBRT-VMAT plans namely, non-coplanar (NC-VMAT) and Coplanar (C-VMAT) were generated in Monaco(v5.11) planning system for Elekta Versa HD Linac using unflatten 6MV photon. The NC-VMAT plans were created by two/three non-coplanar partial arcs with couch rotation of ±150 and had an arc span of 1300 to 1600 whereas the C-VMAT plans consisted of a full arc. Both plans were compared by statistically analyzing various dosimetric and technical parameters. RESULTS There is no statistically significant difference observed between the C-VMAT and NC-VMAT plans for planning target volume (PTV) coverage. However, the spine dose (D1cc) was much less in the NC-VMAT plan compared to the C-VMAT plan, with mean values of 6.127 ± 3.08Gy and 9.058 ± 4.76Gy, respectively (p-value=0.002). The low dose spillage to the healthy tissue was compared by the volume receiving 5Gy (V5Gy) and 10Gy (V10Gy). V5Gy of the NC-VMAT plan was 2399.23±1870.76cc while that of C-VMAT plans was 2835.36±1930.20cc with the p-value <0.001. Moreover, the monitor units(MU) were less with NC-VMAT than with C-VMAT SBRT plans (p=0.015). CONCLUSION The plan quality of NC-VMAT plans was favorable compared to C-VMAT plans for liver SBRT especially in reducing spine dose, low dose spillage to healthy tissue, and MU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjum Nisha
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Medical Radiation Physics Program, Manipal College of Health Professions(MCHP), Manipal Academy of Higher Education(MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India.
| | - Shambhavi C
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Medical Radiation Physics Program, Manipal College of Health Professions(MCHP), Manipal Academy of Higher Education(MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, India.
| | - Jyothi Nagesh
- Radiotherapy and Oncology, Senior Grade Lecturer, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
| | - Sarath S Nair
- Radiotherapy and Oncology, Senior Grade Lecturer, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Firoozabad LA, Cheraghi S, Farahani S, Nikoofar A, Rezaeijo SM, Bakhshandeh M, Paydar R. Prediction of auditory brain stem responses damage in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving radiotherapy using the functional assays of normal tissue complication probability models. J Cancer Res Ther 2024; 20:802-810. [PMID: 39023586 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1485_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
AIM The purpose of this study was to set four NTCP models on clinical data and develop a model that calculates the possibility of hearing damage due to irradiation of healthy and at-risk brainstem tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS ABR tests were performed on 50 head-and-neck cancer patients three years after radiotherapy for evaluation of lesions in a part of the auditory nerve or the auditory pathway in the brainstem. RESULTS It indicated a significant difference in the latency of the waves assessed by the ABR test between the two groups. The paired sample t-test indicated the latency time of waves I, III, V, I-III, and I-V (P < 0.001) in the right ear, and in the left ear latency time of waves III, V, I-III, I-V, and III-V (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the case group's ear than those in the control group. The confidence interval of the fitted parameters was 95% for NTCP models. ABR test's binary outcome with differential dose-volume histograms (dDVHs) was calculated and imported as input to the NTCP modeling. The values of the parameters n = 2.3-2.9 and the value s = 1 were obtained, which indicated that the brainstem organ is seriality. CONCLUSION The best model ranked for the prediction of brainstem hearing damage was the logit model, which had the lowest Akaike value. The nervousness of the auditory organ of the brainstem (VIII nerve) can be declared as one of the reasons for being independent of the received dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan Cheraghi
- Radiation Biology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Allied Medicine Faculty, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Saeid Farahani
- Department of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Nikoofar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Masoud Rezaeijo
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Mohsen Bakhshandeh
- Department of Radiology Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Paydar
- Radiation Biology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Allied Medicine Faculty, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Khandelwal Y, Singh Parihar A, Sistani G, Ramirez-Fort MK, Zukotynski K, Subramaniam RM. Role of PET/Computed Tomography in Gastric and Colorectal Malignancies. PET Clin 2024; 19:177-186. [PMID: 38199915 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
This article focuses on the role of PET/computed tomography in evaluating and managing gastric cancer and colorectal cancer. The authors start with describing the common aspects of imaging with 2-deoxy-2-18F-d-glucose, followed by tumor-specific discussions of gastric and colorectal malignancies. Finally, the authors provide a brief overview of non-FDG tracers including their potential clinical applications, and describe future directions in imaging these malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yogita Khandelwal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, AIIMS Campus, Ansari Nagar East, New Delhi, Delhi 110016, India
| | - Ashwin Singh Parihar
- Mallinckodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 South Kingshighway Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Golmehr Sistani
- Medical Imaging Department, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, 201 Georgian Drive, Barrie, ON L4M 6M2, Canada
| | | | - Katherine Zukotynski
- Department of Medical Imaging, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
| | - Rathan M Subramaniam
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, Midwifery & Health Sciences, 160 Oxford Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kiess AP, O'Donoghue J, Uribe C, Bodei L, Hobbs RF, Hesterman J, Kesner AL, Sgouros G. How Can Radiopharmaceutical Therapies Reach Their Full Potential? Improving Dose Reporting and Phase I Clinical Trial Design. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2301241. [PMID: 38484205 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ana P Kiess
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Joseph O'Donoghue
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Carlos Uribe
- Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert F Hobbs
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Adam L Kesner
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - George Sgouros
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Paetkau O, Weppler S, Kwok J, Quon HC, Gomes da Rocha C, Smith W, Tchistiakova E, Kirkby C. Pharyngeal Constrictor Dose-Volume Histogram Metrics and Patient-Reported Dysphagia in Head and Neck Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:173-182. [PMID: 38220581 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Head and neck radiotherapy long-term survival continues to improve and the management of long-term side-effects is moving to the forefront of patient care. Dysphagia is associated with dose to the pharyngeal constrictors and can be measured using patient-reported outcomes to evaluate its effect on quality of life. The aim of the present study was to relate pharyngeal constrictor dose-volume parameters with patient-reported outcomes to identify prognostic dose constraints. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 64-patient training cohort and a 24-patient testing cohort of oropharynx and nasopharynx cancer patients treated with curative-intent chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively examined. These patients completed the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory outcome survey at 12 months post-radiotherapy to evaluate late dysphagia: a composite score lower than 60 indicated dysphagia. The pharyngeal constrictor muscles were subdivided into four substructures: superior, middle, inferior and cricopharyngeal. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics for each of the structure combinations were extracted. A decision tree classifier was run for each DVH metric to identify dose constraints optimising the accuracy and sensitivity of the cohort. A 60% accuracy threshold and feature selection method were used to ensure statistically significant DVH metrics were identified. These dose constraints were then validated on the 24-patient testing cohort. RESULTS Existing literature dose constraints only had two dose constraints performing above 60% accuracy and sensitivity when evaluated on our training cohort. We identified two well-performing dose constraints: the pharyngeal constrictor muscle D63% < 55 Gy and the superior-middle pharyngeal constrictor combination structure V31Gy < 100%. Both dose constraints resulted in ≥73% mean accuracy and ≥80% mean sensitivity on the training and testing patient cohorts. In addition, a pharyngeal constrictor muscle mean dose <57 Gy resulted in a mean accuracy ≥74% and mean sensitivity ≥60%. CONCLUSION Mid-dose pharyngeal constrictor muscle and substructure combination dose constraints should be used in the treatment planning process to reduce late patient-reported dysphagia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Paetkau
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - S Weppler
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - J Kwok
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - H C Quon
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - C Gomes da Rocha
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Institute for Quantum Science and Technology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - W Smith
- Varian Medical Systems - A Siemens Healthineers Company, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - E Tchistiakova
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - C Kirkby
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kuipers ME, van Doorn-Wink KCJ, Hiemstra PS, Slats AM. Predicting Radiation-Induced Lung Injury in Patients With Lung Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:639-649. [PMID: 37924986 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) is one of the main dose-limiting toxicities in radiation therapy (RT) for lung cancer. Approximately 10% to 20% of patients show signs of RILI of variable severity. The reason for the wide range of RILI severity and the mechanisms underlying its development are only partially understood. A number of clinical risk factors have been identified that can aid in clinical decision making. Technological advancements in RT and the use of strict organ-at-risk dose constraints have helped to reduce RILI. Predicting patients at risk for RILI may be further improved with a combination of cytokine assessments, γH2AX-assays in leukocytes, or epigenetic markers. A complicating factor is the lack of an objective definition of RILI. Tools such as computed tomography densitometry, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography uptake, changes in lung function measurements, and exhaled breath analysis can be implemented to better define and quantify RILI. This can aid in the search for new biomarkers, which can be accelerated by omics techniques, single-cell RNA sequencing, mass cytometry, and advances in patient-specific in vitro cell culture models. An objective quantification of RILI combined with these novel techniques can aid in the development of biomarkers to better predict patients at risk and allow personalized treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merian E Kuipers
- Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Pieter S Hiemstra
- Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies M Slats
- Department of Pulmonology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Irannejad M, Abedi I, Lonbani VD, Hassanvand M. Deep-neural network approaches for predicting 3D dose distribution in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the brain tumors. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14197. [PMID: 37933891 PMCID: PMC10962483 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to reduce treatment planning time by predicting the intensity-modulated radiotherapy 3D dose distribution using deep learning for brain cancer patients. "For this purpose, two different approaches in dose prediction, i.e., first only planning target volume (PTV) and second PTV with organs at risk (OARs) as input of the U-net model, are employed and their results are compared." METHODS AND MATERIALS The data of 99 patients with glioma tumors referred for IMRT treatment were used so that the images of 90 patients were regarded as training datasets and the others were for the test. All patients were manually planned and treated with sixth-field IMRT; the photon energy was 6MV. The treatment plans were done with the Collapsed Cone Convolution algorithm to deliver 60 Gy in 30 fractions. RESULTS The obtained accuracy and similarity for the proposed methods in dose prediction when compared to the clinical dose distributions on test patients according to MSE, dice metric and SSIM for the Only-PTV and PTV-OARs methods are on average (0.05, 0.851, 0.83) and (0.056, 0.842, 0.82) respectively. Also, dose prediction is done in an extremely short time. CONCLUSION The same results of the two proposed methods prove that the presence of OARs in addition to PTV does not provide new knowledge to the network and only by defining the PTV and its location in the imaging slices, does the dose distribution become predictable. Therefore, the Only-PTV method by eliminating the process of introducing OARs can reduce the overall designing time of treatment by IMRT in patients with glioma tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maziar Irannejad
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Najafabad BranchIslamic Azad UniversityNajafabadIran
| | - Iraj Abedi
- Medical Physics Department, School of MedicineIsfahan University of Medical SciencesIsfahanIran
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Carpenter DJ, Salama JK, Lee WR, Boyer MJ. Radiation technique and outcomes following moderately hypofractionated treatment of low risk prostate cancer: a secondary analysis of RTOG 0415. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:95-102. [PMID: 36849728 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00653-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (MHRT) for prostate cancer (PC) is commonly delivered by intensity modulated radiation therapy, IMRT has not been prospectively compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in this context. We conducted a secondary analysis of the phase III RTOG 0415 trial comparing survival and toxicity outcomes for low-risk PC following MHRT with IMRT versus 3D-CRT. METHODS RTOG 0415 was a phase III, non-inferiority trial randomizing low-risk PC patients to either MHRT or conventionally fractionated radiation with stratification by RT technique. A secondary analysis for differences in overall survival (OS), biochemical recurrence free survival (BRFS), or toxicity by EPIC scores and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) was performed. RESULTS 1079 patients received the allocated intervention with a median follow up of 5.8 years. 79.1% of patients were treated with IMRT and radiation technique was balanced between arms. Across all patients, RT technique was not associated with significant differences in BRFS, OS, or rates of acute and late toxicities. For patients completing MHRT, there was a difference in the late GU toxicity distribution between 3D-CRT and IMRT but no difference in late grade 2 or greater GU or GI toxicity. Stratifying patients by RT technique and fractionation, no significant differences were observed in the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in EPIC urinary and bowel scores following RT. CONCLUSIONS RT technique did not impact clinical outcomes following MHRT for low-risk PC. Despite different late GU toxicity distributions in patients treated with MHRT by IMRT or 3D-CRT, there was no difference in late Grade 2 or greater GU or GI toxicity or patient reported toxicity. Increases in late GU and GI toxicity following MHRT compared to CFRT, as demonstrated in the initial publication of RTOG 0415, do not appear related to a 3D-CRT treatment technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Carpenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joseph K Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - W Robert Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Matthew J Boyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Choi W, Jia Y, Kwak J, Werner-Wasik M, Dicker AP, Simone NL, Storozynsky E, Jain V, Vinogradskiy Y. Novel Functional Radiomics for Prediction of Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography Avidity in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2024; 8:e2300241. [PMID: 38452302 PMCID: PMC10939651 DOI: 10.1200/cci.23.00241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Traditional methods of evaluating cardiotoxicity focus on radiation doses to the heart. Functional imaging has the potential to provide improved prediction for cardiotoxicity for patients with lung cancer. Fluorine-18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging is routinely obtained in a standard cancer staging workup. This work aimed to develop a radiomics model predicting clinical cardiac assessment using 18F-FDG PET/CT scans before thoracic radiation therapy. METHODS Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT scans from three study populations (N = 100, N = 39, N = 70) were used, comprising two single-institutional protocols and one publicly available data set. A clinician (V.J.) classified the PET/CT scans per clinical cardiac guidelines as no uptake, diffuse uptake, or focal uptake. The heart was delineated, and 210 novel functional radiomics features were selected to classify cardiac FDG uptake patterns. Training data were divided into training (80%)/validation (20%) sets. Feature reduction was performed using the Wilcoxon test, hierarchical clustering, and recursive feature elimination. Ten-fold cross-validation was carried out for training, and the accuracy of the models to predict clinical cardiac assessment was reported. RESULTS From 202 of 209 scans, cardiac FDG uptake was scored as no uptake (39.6%), diffuse uptake (25.3%), and focal uptake (35.1%), respectively. Sixty-two independent radiomics features were reduced to nine clinically pertinent features. The best model showed 93% predictive accuracy in the training data set and 80% and 92% predictive accuracy in two external validation data sets. CONCLUSION This work used an extensive patient data set to develop a functional cardiac radiomic model from standard-of-care 18F-FDG PET/CT scans, showing good predictive accuracy. The radiomics model has the potential to provide an automated method to predict existing cardiac conditions and provide an early functional biomarker to identify patients at risk of developing cardiac complications after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wookjin Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Yingcui Jia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jennifer Kwak
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Maria Werner-Wasik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Adam P. Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nicole L. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eugene Storozynsky
- Department of Cardiology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Varsha Jain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mason M, Lapuente-Santana Ó, Halkola AS, Wang W, Mall R, Xiao X, Kaufman J, Fu J, Pfeil J, Banerjee J, Chung V, Chang H, Chasalow SD, Lin HY, Chai R, Yu T, Finotello F, Mirtti T, Mäyränpää MI, Bao J, Verschuren EW, Ahmed EI, Ceccarelli M, Miller LD, Monaco G, Hendrickx WRL, Sherif S, Yang L, Tang M, Gu SS, Zhang W, Zhang Y, Zeng Z, Das Sahu A, Liu Y, Yang W, Bedognetti D, Tang J, Eduati F, Laajala TD, Geese WJ, Guinney J, Szustakowski JD, Vincent BG, Carbone DP. A community challenge to predict clinical outcomes after immune checkpoint blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. J Transl Med 2024; 22:190. [PMID: 38383458 PMCID: PMC10880244 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04705-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predictive biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy are currently lacking for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we describe the results from the Anti-PD-1 Response Prediction DREAM Challenge, a crowdsourced initiative that enabled the assessment of predictive models by using data from two randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of ICIs in first-line metastatic NSCLC. METHODS Participants developed and trained models using public resources. These were evaluated with data from the CheckMate 026 trial (NCT02041533), according to the model-to-data paradigm to maintain patient confidentiality. The generalizability of the models with the best predictive performance was assessed using data from the CheckMate 227 trial (NCT02477826). Both trials were phase III RCTs with a chemotherapy control arm, which supported the differentiation between predictive and prognostic models. Isolated model containers were evaluated using a bespoke strategy that considered the challenges of handling transcriptome data from clinical trials. RESULTS A total of 59 teams participated, with 417 models submitted. Multiple predictive models, as opposed to a prognostic model, were generated for predicting overall survival, progression-free survival, and progressive disease status with ICIs. Variables within the models submitted by participants included tumor mutational burden (TMB), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and gene-expression-based signatures. The best-performing models showed improved predictive power over reference variables, including TMB or PD-L1. CONCLUSIONS This DREAM Challenge is the first successful attempt to use protected phase III clinical data for a crowdsourced effort towards generating predictive models for ICI clinical outcomes and could serve as a blueprint for similar efforts in other tumor types and disease states, setting a benchmark for future studies aiming to identify biomarkers predictive of ICI efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION CheckMate 026; NCT02041533, registered January 22, 2014. CheckMate 227; NCT02477826, registered June 23, 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Mason
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Óscar Lapuente-Santana
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Anni S Halkola
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Wenyu Wang
- Faculty of Medicine, Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Raghvendra Mall
- Qatar Computing Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, P.O. Box 34110, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, P.O. Box 38105, Memphis, TN, USA
- Biotechnology Research Center, Technology Innovation Institute, P.O. Box 9639, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Xu Xiao
- School of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
- National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Jacob Kaufman
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jingxin Fu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Han Chang
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Francesca Finotello
- Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Digital Science Center (DiSC), University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tuomas Mirtti
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- iCAN-Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mikko I Mäyränpää
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jie Bao
- Faculty of Medicine, Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Emmy W Verschuren
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eiman I Ahmed
- Human Immunology Department, Sidra Medicine, P.O. Box 26999, Doha, Qatar
| | - Michele Ceccarelli
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (DIETI), University of Naples "Federico II", 80125, Naples, Italy
- BIOGEM Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Via Camporeale, Ariano Irpino, Italy
| | - Lance D Miller
- Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Gianni Monaco
- BIOGEM Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Via Camporeale, Ariano Irpino, Italy
| | - Wouter R L Hendrickx
- Human Immunology Department, Sidra Medicine, P.O. Box 26999, Doha, Qatar
- College of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, P.O. Box 26999, Doha, Qatar
| | - Shimaa Sherif
- Human Immunology Department, Sidra Medicine, P.O. Box 26999, Doha, Qatar
- College of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, P.O. Box 26999, Doha, Qatar
| | - Lin Yang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ming Tang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Yi Zhang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Zexian Zeng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Yang Liu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Davide Bedognetti
- Human Immunology Department, Sidra Medicine, P.O. Box 26999, Doha, Qatar
- College of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, P.O. Box 26999, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Jing Tang
- Faculty of Medicine, Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Biochemistry and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Federica Eduati
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Institute for Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Teemu D Laajala
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- iCAN-Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, Helsinki, Finland
- FICAN West Cancer Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Department of Pharmacology, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | | | | | - Benjamin G Vincent
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Computational Medicine Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - David P Carbone
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Okamoto H, Wakita A, Tani K, Kito S, Kurooka M, Kodama T, Tohyama N, Fujita Y, Nakamura S, Iijima K, Chiba T, Nakayama H, Murata M, Goka T, Igaki H. Plan complexity metrics for head and neck VMAT competition plans. Med Dosim 2024; 49:244-253. [PMID: 38368182 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2024.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
Previous plan competitions have largely focused on dose metric assessments. However, whether the submitted plans were realistic and reasonable from a quality assurance (QA) perspective remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between aperture-based plan complexity metrics (PCM) in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) competition plans and clinical treatment plans verified through patient-specific QA (PSQA). In addition, the association of PCMs with plan quality was examined. A head and neck (HN) plan competition was held for Japanese institutions from June 2019 to July 2019, in which 210 competition plans were submitted. Dose distribution quality was quantified based on dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics by calculating the dose distribution plan score (DDPS). Differences in PCMs between the two VMAT treatment plan groups (HN plan competitions held in Japan and clinically accepted HN VMAT plans through PSQA) were investigated. The mean (± standard deviation) DDPS for the 98 HN competition plans was 158.5 ± 20.6 (maximum DDPS: 200). DDPS showed a weak correlation with PCMs with a maximum r of 0.45 for monitor unit (MU); its correlation with some PCMs was "very weak." Significant differences were found in some PCMs between plans with the highest 20% DDPSs and the remaining plans. The clinical VMAT and competition plans revealed similar distributions for some PCMs. Deviations in PCMs for the two groups were comparable, indicating considerable variability among planners regarding planning skills. The plan complexity for HN VMAT competition plans increased for high-quality plans, as shown by the dose distribution. Direct comparison of PCMs between competition plans and clinically accepted plans showed that the submitted HN VMAT competition plans were realistic and reasonable from the QA perspective. This evaluation may provide a set of criteria for evaluating plan quality in plan competitions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Okamoto
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
| | - Akihisa Wakita
- Division of Medical Physics, EuroMediTech Co., LTD., 2-20-4 higashigotanda, shinagawa-ku Tokyo, 141-0022, Japan
| | - Kensuke Tani
- Division of Medical Physics, EuroMediTech Co., LTD., 2-20-4 higashigotanda, shinagawa-ku Tokyo, 141-0022, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kito
- Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku Tokyo,113-8677, Japan
| | - Masahiko Kurooka
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan
| | - Takumi Kodama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, 780 Ooazakomuro, Inamachi, Kitaadachi-gun Saitama 362-0806, Japan
| | - Naoki Tohyama
- Division of Medical Physics, Tokyo Bay Makuhari Clinic for Advanced Imaging, Cancer Screening, and High-Precision Radiotherapy, 1-17 Toyosuna, Mihama-ku Chiba, Chiba, 261-0024, Japan
| | - Yukio Fujita
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Komazawa University, 1-23-1, komazawa, setagaya-ku Tokyo, 154-8525, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nakamura
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Kotaro Iijima
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Takahito Chiba
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Hiroki Nakayama
- Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Miyuki Murata
- Department of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Tomonori Goka
- Department of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Tello Valverde CP, Ebrahimi G, Sprangers MA, Pateras K, Bruynzeel AME, Jacobs M, Wilmink JW, Besselink MG, Crezee H, van Tienhoven G, Versteijne E. Impact of Short-Course Palliative Radiation Therapy on Pancreatic Cancer-Related Pain: Prospective Phase 2 Nonrandomized PAINPANC Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:352-361. [PMID: 37647972 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical evidence is limited regarding palliative radiation therapy for relieving pancreatic cancer-related pain. We prospectively investigated pain response after short-course palliative radiation therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe pancreatic cancer-related pain. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this prospective phase 2 single center nonrandomized trial, 30 patients with moderate-to-severe pain (5-10, on a 0-10 scale) of pancreatic cancer refractory to pain medication, were treated with a short-course palliative radiation therapy; 24 Gy in 3 weekly fractions (2015-2018). Primary endpoint was defined as a clinically relevant average decrease of ≥2 points in pain severity, compared with baseline, within 7 weeks after the start of treatment. Secondary endpoint was global quality of life (QoL), with a clinically relevant increase of 5 to 10 points (0-100 scale). Pain severity reduction and QoL were assessed 9 times using the Brief Pain Inventory and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C15-PAL, respectively. Both outcomes were analyzed using joint modeling. In addition, acute toxicity based on clinician reporting and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS Overall, 29 of 30 patients (96.7%) received palliative radiation therapy. At baseline, the median oral morphine equivalent daily dose was 129.5 mg (range, 20.0-540.0 mg), which decreased to 75.0 mg (range, 15.0-360.0 mg) after radiation (P = .021). Pain decreased on average 3.15 points from baseline to 7 weeks (one-sided P = .045). Patients reported a clinically relevant mean pain severity reduction from 5.9 to 3.8 points (P = .011) during the first 3 weeks, which further decreased to 3.2 until week 11, ending at 3.4 (P = .006) in week 21 after the first radiation therapy fraction. Global QoL significantly improved from 50.5 to 60.8 during the follow-up period (P = .001). Grade 3 acute toxicity occurred in 3 patients and no grade 4 to 5 toxicity was observed. Median OS was 11.8 weeks, with a 13.3% 1-year actuarial OS rate. CONCLUSIONS Short-course palliative radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer-related pain was associated with rapid, clinically relevant reduction in pain severity, and clinically relevant improvement in global QoL, with mostly mild toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Paola Tello Valverde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Gati Ebrahimi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituut Verbeeten, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam A Sprangers
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstantinos Pateras
- University of Thessaly, Faculty of Public and One Health, Laboratory of Epidemiology & Artificial Intelligence, Karditsa, Greece; Department of Data Science and Biostatistics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center of Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Jacobs
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Crezee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Versteijne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|