1
|
Madan R, Kumar N, Dracham CB, Kumar R, Trivedi G, Tripathi M, Sahoo SK, Singla N, Ahuja CK, Chatterjee D, Yadav A, Goyal S, Khosla D. Prospective Phase II Study of Radiotherapy Dose Escalation in Grade 4 Glioma Using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET Scan. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:e294-e300. [PMID: 38821722 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Local failure remains the major concern in grade 4 glioma or glioblastoma (GBM). Pilot studies have shown a radiotherapy (RT) dose-response relationship in GBM. Here we present our preliminary data of RT dose escalation using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET scan. High 68Ga-pentixafor uptake in glioma cells helps in sharp demarcation between tumour and normal brain. MATERIALS AND METHODS This phase II prospective study was conducted from 2018 to 2020. Thirty, biopsy-proven cases of grade 4 glioma were included. All patients underwent post-operative MRI of the brain and 68Ga-Pentixafor PET scan. RT was planned in 2-phases. Phase-1 GTV (GTV1) comprised of T2/flair abnormality, PET-avid disease and post-op cavity. A margin of 2cm was given to GTV-1 to create phase-1 CTV (CTV1), which was further expanded to 0.5cm to generate phase-1 PTV (PTV1). A radiation dose of 46Gy/23fr was prescribed to PTV-1. Phase-2 GTV (GTV2) consisted of CT/MRI contrast-enhancing lesion, PET avid disease and post-op cavity. A margin of 0.5 cm was given to GTV2 to create phase-2 CTV (CTV2) which was expanded to 0.5 cm to create phase-2 PTV (PTV2). RT dose of 14 Gy/7 fr was prescribed to PTV2. PET avid disease was delineated as GTV PET and a margin of 3mm was given to generate PTV-PET which received escalated RT dose of 21 Gy/7fr by simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in phase 2 (Total dose to PTV PET = 67 Gy/30 fr). All patients received concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. The data was prospectively maintained in Microsoft Excel sheet. SPSS v 23 was used for statistical analysis. The primary endpoints were estimation of the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoint was to measure the incidence of radiation necrosis. Categorical variables were reported as frequency and percentage and quantitative variables were reported as median and range. RESULTS Data from thirty patients were analysed. A median OS of 23 months was observed with estimated 1, 2 and 3 years OS of 90%, 40% and 17.8% respectively. A significant association of OS was seen with the extent of surgery (p = 0.04) and kernofsky performance status (p = 0.007). No patient developed significant radiation necrosis. CONCLUSIONS The index study did not show any survival benefit from dose escalation RT. However, all of the patients tolerated the treatment well and none of them developed radiation necrosis. Considering the small sample size as a limitation of the index study, the role of 68Ga-pentixafor PET scan for radiation dose escalation should be further explored. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER CTRI/2019/05/019146.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Madan
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - N Kumar
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
| | - C B Dracham
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India; Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Government General Hospital, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh, India
| | - R Kumar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - G Trivedi
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - M Tripathi
- Department of Neurosurgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - S K Sahoo
- Department of Neurosurgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - N Singla
- Department of Neurosurgery, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - C K Ahuja
- Department of Radio-diagnosis and Imaging, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - D Chatterjee
- Department of Histopathology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - A Yadav
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, SN Medical College, Agra, India
| | - S Goyal
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | - D Khosla
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yoshida T, Sasaki K, Hayakawa T, Kawadai T, Shibasaki T, Kawasaki Y. Recommendation for reducing the crystalline lens exposure dose by reducing imaging field width in cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy: an anthropomorphic phantom study. Radiol Phys Technol 2024; 17:629-636. [PMID: 38691308 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00810-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
In cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of the head, we evaluated the exposure dose reduction effect to the crystalline lens and position-matching accuracy by narrowing one side (X2) of the X-ray aperture (blade) in the X-direction. We defined the ocular surface dose of the head phantom as the crystalline lens exposure dose and measured using a radiophotoluminescence dosimeter (RPLD, GD-352 M) in the preset field (13.6 cm) and in each of the fields when blade X2 aperture was reduced in 0.5 cm increments from 10.0 to 5.0 cm. Auto-bone matching was performed on CBCT images acquired five times with blade X2 aperture set to 13.6 cm and 5.0 cm at each position when the head phantom was moved from - 5.0 to + 5.0 mm in 1.0 mm increment. The maximum reduction rate in the crystalline lens exposure dose was - 38.7% for the right lens and - 13.2% for the left lens when blade X2 aperture was 5.0 cm. The maximum difference in the amount of position correction between blade X2 aperture of 13.6 cm and 5.0 cm was 1 mm, and the accuracy of auto-bone matching was similar. In CBCT of the head, reduced blade X2 aperture is a useful technique for reducing the crystalline lens exposure dose while ensuring the accuracy of position matching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Yoshida
- Department of Radiology, Koritsu Tatebayashi Kosei General Hospital, Gunma, Japan.
- Graduate School of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences, Gunma, Japan.
| | - Koji Sasaki
- Graduate School of Radiological Technology, Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences, Gunma, Japan
| | - Tomoki Hayakawa
- Department of Radiology, Koritsu Tatebayashi Kosei General Hospital, Gunma, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Kawadai
- Department of Radiology, Koritsu Tatebayashi Kosei General Hospital, Gunma, Japan
| | - Takako Shibasaki
- Department of Radiology, Koritsu Tatebayashi Kosei General Hospital, Gunma, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang F, Dinakaran D, Heikal AA, Yaghoobpour Tari S, Ghosh S, Amanie J, Murtha A, Rowe LS, Roa WH, Patel S. Dosimetric predictors of toxicity in a randomized study of short-course vs conventional radiotherapy for glioblastoma. Radiother Oncol 2022; 177:152-157. [PMID: 36273738 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is no consensus on appropriate organ at risk (OAR) constraints for short-course radiotherapy for patients with glioblastoma. Using dosimetry and prospectively-collected toxicity data from a trial of short-course radiotherapy for glioblastoma, this study aims to empirically examine the OAR constraints, with particular attention to left hippocampus dosimetry and impact on neuro-cognitive decline. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data was taken from a randomized control trial of 133 adults (age 18-70 years; ECOG performance score 0-2) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with 60 Gy in 30 (conventional arm) versus 20 (short-course arm) fractions of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02206230). The delivered plan's dosimetry to the OARs was correlated to prospective-collected toxicity and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) data. RESULTS Toxicity events were not significantly increased in the short-course arm versus the conventional arm. Across all OARs, delivered radiation doses within protocol-allowable maximum doses correlated with lack of grade ≥ 2 toxicities in both arms (p < 0.001), while patients with OAR doses at or above protocol limits correlated with increased grade ≥ 2 toxicities across all examined OARs in both arms (p-values 0.063-0.250). Mean left hippocampus dose was significantly associated with post-radiotherapy decline in MMSE scores (p = 0.005), while the right hippocampus mean dose did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.277). Compared to the original clinical plan, RapidPlan left hippocampus sparing model decreased left hippocampus mean dose by 43 % (p < 0.001), without compromising planning target volume coverage. CONCLUSIONS In this trial, protocol OAR constraints were appropriate for limiting grade ≥ 2 toxicities in conventional and short-course adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma. Higher left hippocampal mean doses were predictive for neuro-cognitive decline post-radiotherapy. Routine contouring and use of dose constraints to limit hippocampal dose is recommended to minimize neuro-cognitive decline in patients with glioblastoma treated with chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Yang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Deepak Dinakaran
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Amr A Heikal
- Division of Medical Physics, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shima Yaghoobpour Tari
- Division of Medical Physics, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sunita Ghosh
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - John Amanie
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Albert Murtha
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lindsay S Rowe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Wilson H Roa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Samir Patel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Alberta, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dose-Volume Constraints fOr oRganS At risk In Radiotherapy (CORSAIR): An "All-in-One" Multicenter-Multidisciplinary Practical Summary. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:7021-7050. [PMID: 36290829 PMCID: PMC9600677 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29100552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safe use of radiotherapy (RT) requires compliance with dose/volume constraints (DVCs) for organs at risk (OaRs). However, the available recommendations are sometimes conflicting and scattered across a number of different documents. Therefore, the aim of this work is to provide, in a single document, practical indications on DVCs for OaRs in external beam RT available in the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS A multidisciplinary team collected bibliographic information on the anatomical definition of OaRs, on the imaging methods needed for their definition, and on DVCs in general and in specific settings (curative RT of Hodgkin's lymphomas, postoperative RT of breast tumors, curative RT of pediatric cancers, stereotactic ablative RT of ventricular arrythmia). The information provided in terms of DVCs was graded based on levels of evidence. RESULTS Over 650 papers/documents/websites were examined. The search results, together with the levels of evidence, are presented in tabular form. CONCLUSIONS A working tool, based on collected guidelines on DVCs in different settings, is provided to help in daily clinical practice of RT departments. This could be a first step for further optimizations.
Collapse
|
5
|
Harat M, Blok M, Miechowicz I, Wiatrowska I, Makarewicz K, Małkowski B. Safety and efficacy of irradiation boost based on 18F-FET-PET in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:3011-3020. [PMID: 35552391 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Dual timepoint FET-PET acquisition (10 and 60 minutes after FET injection) improves the definition of glioblastoma location and shape. Here we evaluated the safety and efficacy of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) planned using dual FET-PET for postoperative glioblastoma treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN In this prospective pilot study (March 2017-December 2020), 17 patients qualified for FET-PET-based SIB intensity-modulated radiotherapy after resection. The prescribed dose was 78 and 60 Gy (2.6 and 2.0 Gy per fraction, respectively) for the FET-PET- and MR-based target volumes. Eleven patients had FET-PET within nine months to precisely define biological responses. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicities, and radiation necrosis were evaluated. Six patients (35%) had tumors with MGMT promoter methylation. RESULTS The one- and two-year OS and PFS rates were 73% and 43% and 53% and 13%, respectively. The median OS and PFS were 24 (95%CI 9-26) and 12 (95%CI 6-18) months, respectively. Two patients developed uncontrolled seizures during radiotherapy and could not receive treatment per protocol. In patients treated per protocol, 7/15 presented with new or increased neurological deficits in the first month after irradiation. Radiation necrosis was diagnosed by MRI three months after SIB in five patients and later in another two patients. In two patients, the tumor was larger in FET-PET images after six months. CONCLUSIONS Survival outcomes using our novel dose escalation concept (total 78 Gy) were promising, even within the MGMTunmethylated subgroup. Excessive neurotoxicity was not observed, but radionecrosis was common and must be considered in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Harat
- Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Maciej Blok
- Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Waqar M, Trifiletti DM, McBain C, O'Connor J, Coope DJ, Akkari L, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Borst GR. Early Therapeutic Interventions for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Rationale and Review of the Literature. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:311-324. [PMID: 35119629 PMCID: PMC8885508 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01157-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Glioblastoma is the commonest primary brain cancer in adults whose outcomes are amongst the worst of any cancer. The current treatment pathway comprises surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy though unresectable diffusely infiltrative tumour cells remain untreated for several weeks post-diagnosis. Intratumoural heterogeneity combined with increased hypoxia in the postoperative tumour microenvironment potentially decreases the efficacy of adjuvant interventions and fails to prevent early postoperative regrowth, called rapid early progression (REP). In this review, we discuss the clinical implications and biological foundations of post-surgery REP. Subsequently, clinical interventions potentially targeting this phenomenon are reviewed systematically. RECENT FINDINGS Early interventions include early systemic chemotherapy, neoadjuvant immunotherapy, local therapies delivered during surgery (including Gliadel wafers, nanoparticles and stem cell therapy) and several radiotherapy techniques. We critically appraise and compare these strategies in terms of their efficacy, toxicity, challenges and potential to prolong survival. Finally, we discuss the most promising strategies that could benefit future glioblastoma patients. There is biological rationale to suggest that early interventions could improve the outcome of glioblastoma patients and they should be investigated in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mueez Waqar
- Department of Academic Neurological Surgery, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health and Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Mayo 1N, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Catherine McBain
- Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Dept 58, Floor 2a, Room 21-2-13, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - James O'Connor
- Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Dept 58, Floor 2a, Room 21-2-13, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - David J Coope
- Department of Academic Neurological Surgery, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health and Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Leila Akkari
- Division of Tumour Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Mayo 1N, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Gerben R Borst
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health and Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
- Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Dept 58, Floor 2a, Room 21-2-13, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moderately hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiation therapy with temozolomide for young and fit patients with glioblastoma: an institutional experience and meta-analysis of literature. J Neurooncol 2022; 160:361-374. [PMID: 36355260 PMCID: PMC9648463 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04151-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Shorter hypofractionated radiation therapy (HF-RT) schedules may have radiobiological, patient convenience and healthcare resource advantages over conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CF-RT) in glioblastoma (GBM). We report outcomes of young, fit GBM patients treated with HF-RT and CF-RT during the COVID-19 pandemic, and a meta-analysis of HF-RT literature in this patient subgroup. METHODS Hospital records of patients with IDH-wildtype GBM treated with HF-RT (50 Gy/20 fractions) and CF-RT (60 Gy/30 fractions) between January 2020 and September 2021 were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable analysis was performed using Cox regression analysis. A systematic search and meta-analysis of studies from January 2000 to January 2022 was performed. RESULTS 41 patients were treated (HF-RT:15, CF-RT:26). For both HF-RT and CF-RT groups, median age was 58 years and 80-90% were ECOG 0-1. There were more methylated tumours in the HF-RT group. All patients received concurrent/adjuvant temozolomide. At 19.2 months median follow-up, median OS was 19.8 months and not-reached for HF-RT and CF-RT (p = 0.5), and median PFS was 7.7 and 5.8 months, respectively (p = 0.8). HF-RT or CF-RT did not influence OS/PFS on univariable analysis. Grade 3 radionecrosis rate was 6.7% and 7.7%, respectively. 15 of 1135 studies screened from a systematic search were eligible for meta-analysis. For studies involving temozolomide, pooled median OS and PFS with HF-RT were 17.5 and 9.9 months (927 and 862 patients). Studies using shortened HF-RT schedules reported 0-2% Grade 3 radionecrosis rates. CONCLUSION HF-RT may offer equivalent outcomes and reduce treatment burden compared to CF-RT in young, fit GBM patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Antoni D, Feuvret L, Biau J, Robert C, Mazeron JJ, Noël G. Radiation guidelines for gliomas. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:116-128. [PMID: 34953698 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumour. The proximity of organs at risk, the infiltrating nature, and the radioresistance of gliomas have to be taken into account in the choice of prescribed dose and technique of radiotherapy. The management of glioma patients is based on clinical factors (age, KPS) and tumour characteristics (histology, molecular biology, tumour location), and strongly depends on available and associated treatments, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. The knowledge of molecular biomarkers is currently essential, they are increasingly evolving as additional factors that facilitate diagnostics and therapeutic decision-making. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on the indications and the technical procedures for performing radiation therapy in patients with gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Antoni
- Service de radiothérapie, institut cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg cedex, France.
| | - L Feuvret
- Service de radiothérapie, CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - J Biau
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, Unicancer, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 392, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand cedex 01, France
| | - C Robert
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie Gustave-Roussy, 39, rue Camille-Desmoulin, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - J-J Mazeron
- Service de radiothérapie, CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance publique-hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - G Noël
- Service de radiothérapie, institut cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67200 Strasbourg cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hessen ED, Makocki S, van der Heide UA, Jasperse B, Lutkenhaus LJ, Lamers E, Damen E, Troost EGC, Borst GR. The impact of anatomical changes during photon or proton based radiation treatment on tumor dose in glioblastoma dose escalation trials. Radiother Oncol 2021; 164:202-208. [PMID: 34592361 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE Most dose-escalation trials in glioblastoma patients integrate the escalated dose throughout the standard course by targeting a specific subvolume. We hypothesize that anatomical changes during irradiation may affect the dose coverage of this subvolume for both proton- and photon-based radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS For 24 glioblastoma patients a photon- and proton-based dose escalation treatment plan (of 75 Gy/30 fr) was simulated on the dedicated radiotherapy planning MRI obtained before treatment. The escalated dose was planned to cover the resection cavity and/or contrast enhancing lesion on the T1w post-gadolinium MRI sequence. To analyze the effect of anatomical changes during treatment, we evaluated on an additional MRI that was obtained during treatment the changes of the dose distribution on this specific high dose region. RESULTS The median time between the planning MRI and additional MRI was 26 days (range 16-37 days). The median time between the planning MRI and start of radiotherapy was relatively short (7 days, range 3-11 days). In 3 patients (12.5%) changes were observed which resulted in a substantial deterioration of both the photon and proton treatment plans. All these patients underwent a subtotal resection, and a decrease in dose coverage of more than 5% and 10% was observed for the photon- and proton-based treatment plans, respectively. CONCLUSION Our study showed that only for a limited number of patients anatomical changes during photon or proton based radiotherapy resulted in a potentially clinically relevant underdosage in the subvolume. Therefore, volume changes during treatment are unlikely to be responsible for the negative outcome of dose-escalation studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline D Hessen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Makocki
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bas Jasperse
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lotte J Lutkenhaus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Emmy Lamers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eugène Damen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Germany
| | - Gerben R Borst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie National Health Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Singh R, Lehrer EJ, Wang M, Perlow HK, Zaorsky NG, Trifiletti DM, Bovi J, Navarria P, Scoccianti S, Gondi V, Brown PD, Palmer JD. Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme: An International Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 22 Prospective Trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:371-384. [PMID: 33991621 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Limited evidence is available on the utility of dose-escalated radiation therapy (DE-RT) with or without temozolomide (TMZ) versus standard-of-care radiation therapy (SoC-RT) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between DE-RT and SoC-RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS We used a Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses/Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology selection criterion to identify studies. The primary and secondary outcomes were 1-year OS and 1-year PFS, respectively. Outcomes and comparisons were subdivided based on receipt of TMZ and MGMT status. DE-RT was defined based on equivalent dose calculations. Random effects meta-analyses using the Knapp-Hartung correction, arcsine transformation, and restricted maximum likelihood method were conducted. Meta-regression was used to compare therapeutic (eg, DE-RT or TMZ) and pathologic characteristics (eg, MGMT methylation status) using the Wald-type test. RESULTS Across 22 published studies, 2198 patients with glioblastoma multiforme were included; 507 received DE-RT. One-year OS after DE-RT alone was higher than SoC-RT alone (46.3% vs 23.4%; P = .02) as was 1-year PFS (17.9% vs 5.3%; P = .02). No significant difference in 1-year OS (73.2% vs 64.4%; P = .23) or 1-year PFS (44.5% vs 44.3%; P = .33) between DE-RT + TMZ and SoC-RT + TMZ was noted. No difference in 1-year OS was noted between DE-RT + TMZ and SoC-RT + TMZ in either MGMT methylated (83.2% vs 73.2%; P = .23) or MGMT unmethylated (72.6% vs 50.6%; P = .16) patients. CONCLUSIONS DE-RT alone resulted in superior PFS and OS versus SoC-RT alone. DE-RT + TMZ did not lead to improved outcomes versus SoC-RT + TMZ. No differential benefit based on MGMT status was found. Future studies are warranted to define which subgroups benefit most from DE-RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raj Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Ming Wang
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Haley K Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania; Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Joseph Bovi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Silvia Scoccianti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chiang CS, Shih IJ, Shueng PW, Kao M, Zhang LW, Chen SF, Chen MH, Liu TY. Tumor cell-targeting radiotherapy in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme using linear accelerators. Acta Biomater 2021; 125:300-311. [PMID: 33609743 DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Although boron neuron capture therapy (BNCT) has enabled the delivery of stronger radiation dose to glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cells for precision radiotherapy (RT), patients in need are almost unable to access the treatment due to insufficient operating devices. Therefore, we developed targeted sensitization-enhanced radiotherapy (TSER), a strategy that could achieve precision cell-targeted RT using common linear accelerators. TSER, which involves the combination of GoldenDisk (GD; a spherical radioenhancer), 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), low-intensity ultrasound (US), and low-dose RT, exhibited synergized radiosensitization effects. Both 5-ALA and hyaluronic-acid-immobilized GD can selectively accumulate in GBM to induce chemical and biological enhancement of radiosensitization, resulting in DNA damage, escalation of reactive oxygen species levels, and cell cycle redistribution, in turn sensitizing GBM cells to radiation under US. TSER showed an enhanced therapeutic effect and survival in the treatment of an orthotropic GBM model with only 20% of the radiation dose compared to that of a 10-Gy RT. The strategy with the potential to inhibit GBM progress and rescue the organ at risk using low-dose RT, thereby improving the quality of life of GBM patients, shedding light on achieving cell-targeted RT using universally available linear accelerators. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: We invented GoldenDisk (GD), a radioenhancer with hyaluronic-acid (HAc)-coated gold nanoparticle (AuNP)-core/silica shell nanoparticle, to make radiotherapy (RT) safer and smarter. The surface modification of HAc and silica allows GD to target CD44-overexpressed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cells and stay structurally stable in cytoplasm throughout the course of RT. By combining GD with low-energy ultrasound and an FDA-approved imaging agent, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), GBM cells were sensitized to RT leaving healthy tissues in the vicinity unaffected. The ionized radiation can further be transferred to photoelectronic products with higher cytotoxicity by GD upon collision, achieving higher therapeutic efficacy. With the newly-developed strategy, we are able to achieve low-dose precision RT with the use of only 20% radiation dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Sheng Chiang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Cell Therapy Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - I-Ju Shih
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Wei Shueng
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Min Kao
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li-Wen Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shuo-Fu Chen
- National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Hong Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Nanomedicine and Medical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Tse-Ying Liu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ferro M, Ferro M, Macchia G, Cilla S, Buwenge M, Re A, Romano C, Boccardi M, Picardi V, Cammelli S, Cucci E, Mignogna S, Di Lullo L, Valentini V, Morganti AG, Deodato F. Post-Operative Accelerated-Hypofractionated Chemoradiation With Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Glioblastoma: A Phase I Study (ISIDE-BT-2). Front Oncol 2021; 10:626400. [PMID: 33692944 PMCID: PMC7937791 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.626400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain cancer and one of the most lethal tumors. Theoretically, modern radiotherapy (RT) techniques allow dose-escalation due to the reduced irradiation of healthy tissues. This study aimed to define the adjuvant maximum tolerated dose (MTD) using volumetric modulated arc RT with simultaneous integrated boost (VMAT-SIB) plus standard dose temozolomide (TMZ) in GBM. Methods A Phase I clinical trial was performed in operated GBM patients using VMAT-SIB technique with progressively increased total dose. RT was delivered in 25 fractions (5 weeks) to two planning target volumes (PTVs) defined by adding a 5-mm margin to the clinical target volumes (CTVs). The CTV1 was the tumor bed plus the MRI enhancing residual lesion with 10-mm margin. The CTV2 was the CTV1 plus 20-mm margin. Only PTV1 dose was escalated (planned dose levels: 72.5, 75, 77.5, 80, 82.5, 85 Gy), while PTV2 dose remained unchanged (45 Gy/1.8 Gy). Concurrent and sequential TMZ was prescribed according to the EORTC/NCIC protocol. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as any G ≥ 3 non-hematological acute toxicity or any G ≥ 4 acute hematological toxicities (RTOG scale) or any G ≥ 2 late toxicities (RTOG-EORTC scale). Results Thirty-seven patients (M/F: 21/16; median age: 59 years; median follow-up: 12 months) were enrolled and treated as follows: 6 patients (72.5 Gy), 10 patients (75 Gy), 10 patients (77.5 Gy), 9 patients (80 Gy), 2 patients (82.5 Gy), and 0 patients (85 Gy). Eleven patients (29.7%) had G1-2 acute neurological toxicity, while 3 patients (8.1%) showed G ≥ 3 acute neurological toxicities at 77.5 Gy, 80 Gy, and 82.5 Gy levels, respectively. Since two DLTs (G3 neurological: 1 patient and G5 hematological toxicity: 1 patient) were observed at 82.5 Gy level, the trial was closed and the 80 Gy dose-level was defined as the MTD. Two asymptomatic histologically proven radionecrosis were recorded. Conclusions According to the results of this Phase I trial, 80 Gy in 25 fractions accelerated hypofractionated RT is the MTD using VMAT-SIB plus standard dose TMZ in resected GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marica Ferro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Milena Ferro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessia Re
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Carmela Romano
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Mariangela Boccardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Picardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eleonora Cucci
- Radiology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Samantha Mignogna
- Medical Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Liberato Di Lullo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Roma, Italy.,Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.,Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu S, Zhao Q, Shi W, Zheng Z, Liu Z, Meng L, Dong L, Jiang X. Advances in radiotherapy and comprehensive treatment of high-grade glioma: immunotherapy and tumor-treating fields. J Cancer 2021; 12:1094-1104. [PMID: 33442407 PMCID: PMC7797642 DOI: 10.7150/jca.51107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are the most common primary malignant brain tumors. They have a high degree of malignancy and show invasive growth. The personal treatment plan for HGG is based on the patient's age, performance status, and degree of tumor invasion. The basic treatment plan for HGG involves tumor resection, radiotherapy (RT) with concomitant temozolomide (TMZ), and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy. The basic radiation technology includes conventional RT, three-dimensional conformal RT, intensity-modulated RT, and stereotactic RT. As our understanding of tumor pathogenesis has deepened, so-called comprehensive treatment schemes have attracted attention. These combine RT with chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or tumor-treating fields. These emerging treatments are expected to improve the prospects of patients with HGG. In the present article, we review the recent advances in RT and comprehensive treatment for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent HGG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiyu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.,Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Qin Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.,Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Weiyan Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.,Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Zhuangzhuang Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.,Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Zijing Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.,Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Lingbin Meng
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Lihua Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.,Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| | - Xin Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.,Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology & Therapy, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Farrell C, Shi W, Bodman A, Olson JJ. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of emerging developments in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2020; 150:269-359. [PMID: 33215345 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03607-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
TARGET POPULATION These recommendations apply to adult patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma. IMAGING Question What imaging modalities are in development that may be able to provide improvements in diagnosis, and therapeutic guidance for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma? RECOMMENDATION Level III: It is suggested that techniques utilizing magnetic resonance imaging for diffusion weighted imaging, and to measure cerebral blood and magnetic spectroscopic resonance imaging of N-acetyl aspartate, choline and the choline to N-acetyl aspartate index to assist in diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma. SURGERY Question What new surgical techniques can be used to provide improved tumor definition and resectability to yield better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma? RECOMMENDATIONS Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve extent of tumor resection in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve median survival and 2 year survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients with clinical characteristics suggesting poor prognosis. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials assessing the value of diffusion tensor imaging in improving the safety of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergoing surgery. NEUROPATHOLOGY Question What new pathology techniques and measurement of biomarkers in tumor tissue can be used to provide improved diagnostic ability, and determination of therapeutic responsiveness and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATIONS Level II: Assessment of tumor MGMT promoter methylation status is recommended as a significant predictor of a longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level II: Measurement of tumor expression of neuron-glia-2, neurofilament protein, glutamine synthetase and phosphorylated STAT3 is recommended as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Assessment of tumor IDH1 mutation status is suggested as a predictor of longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Evaluation of tumor expression of Phosphorylated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase protein, EGFR protein, and Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-3 is suggested as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. RADIATION Question What radiation therapy techniques are in development that may be used to provide improved tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATIONS Level III: It is suggested that patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergo pretreatment radio-labeled amino acid tracer positron emission tomography to assess areas at risk for tumor recurrence to assist in radiation treatment planning. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of radiation dose escalation, altered fractionation, or new radiation delivery techniques. CHEMOTHERAPY Question What emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATION Level III: As no emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques were identified in this review that improved tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of chemotherapy. MOLECULAR AND TARGETED THERAPY Question What new targeted therapy agents are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATION Level III: As no new molecular and targeted therapies have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of molecular and targeted therapies IMMUNOTHERAPY: Question What emerging immunotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATION Level III: As no immunotherapeutic agents have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of immunologically-based therapies. NOVEL THERAPIES Question What novel therapies or techniques are in development to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATIONS Level II: The use of tumor-treating fields is recommended for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who have undergone surgical debulking and completed concurrent chemoradiation without progression of disease at the time of tumor-treating field therapy initiation. Level II: It is suggested that, when available, enrollment in properly designed studies of vector containing herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene and prodrug therapies be considered in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Farrell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wenyin Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Applications of radiomics and machine learning for radiotherapy of malignant brain tumors. Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 196:856-867. [PMID: 32394100 PMCID: PMC7498494 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01626-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and amino acid positron-emission tomography (PET) of the brain contain a vast amount of structural and functional information that can be analyzed by machine learning algorithms and radiomics for the use of radiotherapy in patients with malignant brain tumors. Methods This study is based on comprehensive literature research on machine learning and radiomics analyses in neuroimaging and their potential application for radiotherapy in patients with malignant glioma or brain metastases. Results Feature-based radiomics and deep learning-based machine learning methods can be used to improve brain tumor diagnostics and automate various steps of radiotherapy planning. In glioma patients, important applications are the determination of WHO grade and molecular markers for integrated diagnosis in patients not eligible for biopsy or resection, automatic image segmentation for target volume planning, prediction of the location of tumor recurrence, and differentiation of pseudoprogression from actual tumor progression. In patients with brain metastases, radiomics is applied for additional detection of smaller brain metastases, accurate segmentation of multiple larger metastases, prediction of local response after radiosurgery, and differentiation of radiation injury from local brain metastasis relapse. Importantly, high diagnostic accuracies of 80–90% can be achieved by most approaches, despite a large variety in terms of applied imaging techniques and computational methods. Conclusion Clinical application of automated image analyses based on radiomics and artificial intelligence has a great potential for improving radiotherapy in patients with malignant brain tumors. However, a common problem associated with these techniques is the large variability and the lack of standardization of the methods applied.
Collapse
|
16
|
Guler OC, Yıldırım BA, Önal C, Topkan E. Retrospective comparison of standard and escalated doses of radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Indian J Cancer 2019; 56:59-64. [PMID: 30950447 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_128_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the efficacies of standard dose-(SDRT) and escalated dose radiotherapy (EDRT) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). MATERIALS AND METHODS Outcomes of 126 newly diagnosed GBM patients who received SDRT (60 Gy, 30 fractions) or EDRT (70 Gy, 30 fractions) with concurrent plus adjuvant TMZ were retrospectively analyzed. Both groups received concurrent TMZ (75 mg/m2) during the course of RT and at least one course of adjuvant TMZ (150-200 mg/m2), thereafter. Overall survival (OS) and local progression free survival (LPFS) constituted the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. RESULTS At median 14.2 months follow-up, 26 (20.6%) patients were alive. Median LPFS and OS were 9.2 [95% confidence interval (CI); 8.4-10.0] and 15.4 months (95% CI; 12.1-18.8), respectively, for the entire cohort. Although the median OS was numerically superior in the EDRT this difference could not reach statistical significance (22.0 vs. 14.9 months; P = 0.45), Likewise, LPFS was also (9.9 vs. 8.9 months; P = 0.89) not different between the two treatment groups. In multivariate analysis, better recursive partitioning analysis class (3-4 vs. 5; P = 0.044) and extensive surgery (gross total resection vs. subtotal resection/biopsy only; P= 0.021) were identified to associate significantly with superior OS times, irrespective of the RT protocol. CONCLUSIONS Although the current median OS of 22 months of the EDRT group is promising, no statistically significant survival advantage for EDRT was observed even in the presence of TMZ. Randomized studies with larger population sizes and available genetic markers are warranted to conclude more reliably on the fate of EDRT plus TMZ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozan Cem Guler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Berna Akkuş Yıldırım
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Cem Önal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Erkan Topkan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Adana, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zschaeck S, Wust P, Graf R, Misch M, Onken J, Ghadjar P, Badakhshi H, Florange J, Budach V, Kaul D. Locally dose-escalated radiotherapy may improve intracranial local control and overall survival among patients with glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:251. [PMID: 30567592 PMCID: PMC6299982 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1194-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The dismal overall survival (OS) prognosis of glioblastoma, even after trimodal therapy, can be attributed mainly to the frequent incidence of intracranial relapse (ICR), which tends to present as an in-field recurrence after a radiation dose of 60 Gray (Gy). In this study, molecular marker-based prognostic indices were used to compare the outcomes of radiation with a standard dose versus a moderate dose escalation. Methods This retrospective analysis included 156 patients treated between 2009 and 2016. All patients were medically fit for postoperative chemoradiotherapy. In the dose-escalation cohort a simultaneous integrated boost of up to 66 Gy (66 Gy RT) within small high-risk volumes was applied. All other patients received daily radiation to a total dose of 60 Gy or twice daily to a total dose of 59.2 Gy (60 Gy RT). Results A total of 133 patients received standard 60 Gy RT, while 23 received 66 Gy RT. Patients in the 66 Gy RT group were younger (p < 0.001), whereas concomitant temozolomide use was more frequent in the 60 Gy RT group (p < 0.001). Other intergroup differences in known prognostic factors were not observed. Notably, the median time to ICR was significantly prolonged in the 66 Gy RT arm versus the 60 Gy RT arm (12.2 versus 7.6 months, p = 0.011), and this translated to an improved OS (18.8 versus 15.3 months, p = 0.012). A multivariate analysis revealed a strong association of 66 Gy RT with a prolonged time to ICR (hazard ratio = 0.498, p = 0.01) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.451, p = 0.01). These differences remained significant after implementing molecular marker-based prognostic scores (ICR p = 0.008, OS p = 0.007) and propensity-scored matched pairing (ICR p = 0.099, OS p = 0.023). Conclusion Radiation dose escalation was found to correlate with an improved time to ICR and OS in this cohort of glioblastoma patients. However, further prospective validation of these results is warranted. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-1194-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Wust
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Reinhold Graf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Misch
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Onken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Harun Badakhshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ernst von Bergmann Medical Center, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Julian Florange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Piper RJ, Senthil KK, Yan JL, Price SJ. Neuroimaging classification of progression patterns in glioblastoma: a systematic review. J Neurooncol 2018; 139:77-88. [PMID: 29603080 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2843-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2017] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our primary objective was to report the current neuroimaging classification systems of spatial patterns of progression in glioblastoma. In addition, we aimed to report the terminology used to describe 'progression' and to assess the compliance with the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria. METHODS We conducted a systematic review to identify all neuroimaging studies of glioblastoma that have employed a categorical classification system of spatial progression patterns. Our review was registered with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) registry. RESULTS From the included 157 results, we identified 129 studies that used labels of spatial progression patterns that were not based on radiation volumes (Group 1) and 50 studies that used labels that were based on radiation volumes (Group 2). In Group 1, we found 113 individual labels and the most frequent were: local/localised (58%), distant/distal (51%), diffuse (20%), multifocal (15%) and subependymal/subventricular zone (15%). We identified 13 different labels used to refer to 'progression', of which the most frequent were 'recurrence' (99%) and 'progression' (92%). We identified that 37% (n = 33/90) of the studies published following the release of the RANO classification were adherent compliant with the RANO criteria. CONCLUSIONS Our review reports significant heterogeneity in the published systems used to classify glioblastoma spatial progression patterns. Standardization of terminology and classification systems used in studying progression would increase the efficiency of our research in our attempts to more successfully treat glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rory J Piper
- Cambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Hill's Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Keerthi K Senthil
- Cambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Hill's Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Jiun-Lin Yan
- Cambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Hill's Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Stephen J Price
- Cambridge Brain Tumour Imaging Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Hill's Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gerasimov VA, Boldyreva VV, Datsenko PV. [Hypofractionated radiotherapy for glioblastoma: changing the radiation treatment paradigm]. ZHURNAL VOPROSY NEĬROKHIRURGII IMENI N. N. BURDENKO 2018; 81:116-124. [PMID: 29393295 DOI: 10.17116/neiro2017816116-124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Hypofractionation has the dual advantage of increased cell death with a higher dose per fraction and a reduced effect of accelerated tumor cell repopulation due to a shorter overall treatment time. However, the potential advantage may be offset by increased toxicity in the late-responding neural tissues. Recently, investigators have attempted delivering radical doses of HFRT by escalating the dose in the immediate vicinity of the enhancing tumor and postoperative surgical cavity and reported reasonable outcomes with acceptable toxicity levels. Three different studies of high-dose HFRT have reported on the paradoxical phenomenon of improved survival in patients developing radiation necrosis at the primary tumor site. The toxicity criteria of RTOG and EORTC have defined clinically or radiographically suspected radionecrosis as Grade 4 toxicity. However, most patients diagnosed with radiation necrosis in the above studies remained asymptomatic. Furthermore, the probable association with improved survival would strongly argue against adopting a blind approach for classifying radiation necrosis as Grade 4 toxicity. The data emerging from the above studies is encouraging and strongly argues for further research. However, the majority of these studies are predominantly retrospective or relatively small single-arm prospective series that add little to the overall quality of evidence. Notwithstanding the above limitations, HFRT appears to be a safe and feasible strategy for glioblastoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V A Gerasimov
- Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Moscow, Russia, 125284
| | - V V Boldyreva
- Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Moscow, Russia, 125284
| | - P V Datsenko
- Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Moscow, Russia, 125284
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Feuvret L, Antoni D, Biau J, Truc G, Noël G, Mazeron JJ. [Guidelines for the radiotherapy of gliomas]. Cancer Radiother 2016; 20 Suppl:S69-79. [PMID: 27521036 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumours. Treating these tumours is difficult because of the proximity of organs at risk, infiltrating nature, and radioresistance. Clinical prognostic factors such as age, Karnofsky performance status, tumour location, and treatments such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy have long been recognized in the management of patients with gliomas. Molecular biomarkers are increasingly evolving as additional factors that facilitate diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making. These practice guidelines aim at helping in choosing the best treatment, in particular radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Feuvret
- Service de radiothérapie, CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - D Antoni
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg, France
| | - J Biau
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, Unicancer, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 392, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand cedex 1, France
| | - G Truc
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, Unicancer, 1, rue Professeur-Marion, BP 77980, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - G Noël
- Département universitaire de radiothérapie, centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67065 Strasbourg, France
| | - J-J Mazeron
- Service de radiothérapie, CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Truc G, Bernier V, Mirjolet C, Dalban C, Mazoyer F, Bonnetain F, Blanchard N, Lagneau É, Maingon P, Noël G. A phase I dose escalation study using simultaneous integrated-boost IMRT with temozolomide in patients with unifocal glioblastoma. Cancer Radiother 2016; 20:193-8. [PMID: 27117900 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2015.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2015] [Revised: 10/02/2015] [Accepted: 12/10/2015] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the maximum tolerated dose of simultaneous integrated-boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) associated with temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between November 2009 and January 2012, nine patients with malignant glioma were enrolled in this phase I clinical trial. Radiotherapy was delivered using fractions of 2.5Gy on the planning target volume b and of 1.9Gy on the planning target volume a. Volumes were defined as follow: gross tumour volume b: tumour taking up contrast on T1 weighted MRI images; clinical target volume b: gross tumour volume b+0.5cm (adapted to the anatomical structures) and lastly planning target volume b: clinical target volume b+0.5cm; gross tumour volume a: tumour (gross tumour volume b)+2cm and including oedema outlined on T2Flair MRI sequences; clinical target volume a gross tumour volume a+0.5cm (adapted to the anatomical structures); planning target volume a: clinical target volume a+0.5cm. Three patients were enrolled at each of the three levels of dose (70, 75 and 80Gy prescribed on the planning target volume b and 56, 60 and 60.8Gy on the planning target volume a). Radiotherapy was delivered with temozolomide according to the standard protocol. Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as any haematological toxicities at least grade 4 or as any radiotherapy-related non-haematological acute toxicities at least grade 3, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. RESULTS Until the last dose level of 80Gy, no patient showed dose-limiting toxicity. CONCLUSIONS SIB-IMRT, at least until a dose of 80Gy in 32 daily fractions, associated with temozolomide is feasible and well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Truc
- Radiotherapy Department, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue du Pr-Marion, 21079 Dijon, France.
| | - V Bernier
- Radiotherapy Department, institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, avenue de Bourgogne, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - C Mirjolet
- Radiotherapy Department, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue du Pr-Marion, 21079 Dijon, France
| | - C Dalban
- Biostatistics and Epidemiological Unit, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue du Pr-Marion, 21079 Dijon, France
| | - F Mazoyer
- Radiation Physics Department, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue du Pr-Marion, 21079 Dijon, France
| | - F Bonnetain
- Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology unit (EA 3181), CHU de Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France
| | - N Blanchard
- Radiotherapy Department, hôpital privé les Dentellières, 10, avenue Vauban, 59300 Valenciennes, France
| | - É Lagneau
- Radiotherapy Department, hôpital privé Drevon, 7, rue des Princes-de-Condé, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - P Maingon
- Radiotherapy Department, centre Georges-François-Leclerc, 1, rue du Pr-Marion, 21079 Dijon, France
| | - G Noël
- Radiotherapy Department, centre Paul-Strauss, 3, rue de la Porte-de-l'Hôpital, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Buglione M, Pedretti S, Poliani PL, Liserre R, Gipponi S, Spena G, Borghetti P, Pegurri L, Saiani F, Spiazzi L, Tesini G, Uccelli C, Triggiani L, Magrini SM. Pattern of relapse of glioblastoma multiforme treated with radical radio-chemotherapy: Could a margin reduction be proposed? J Neurooncol 2016; 128:303-12. [PMID: 27025858 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-016-2112-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2015] [Accepted: 03/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
To analyse the pattern of recurrence of patients treated with Stupp protocol in relation to technique, to compare in silico plans with reduced margin (1 cm) with the original ones and to analyse toxicity. 105 patients were treated: 85 had local recurrence and 68 of them were analysed. Recurrence was considered in field, marginal and distant if >80 %, 20-80 % or <20 % of the relapse volume was included in the 95 %-isodose. In silico plans were retrospectively recalculated using the same technique, fields angles and treatment planning system of the original ones. The pattern of recurrence was in field, marginal and distant in 88, 10 and 2 % respectively and was similar in in silico plans. The margin reduction appears to spare 100 cc of healthy brain by 57 Gy-volume (p = 0.02). The target coverage was worse in standard plans (pt student < 0.001), especially if the tumour was near to organs at risk (pχ2 < 0.001). PTV coverage was better with IMRT and helical-IMRT, than conformal-3D (pAnova test = 0.038). This difference was no more significant with in silico planning. A higher incidence of asthenia and leuko-encephalopathy was observed in patients with greater percentage of healthy brain included in 57 Gy-volume. No differences in the pattern of recurrence according to margins were found. The margin reduction determines sparing of healthy brain and could possibly reduce the incidence of late toxicity. Margin reduction could allow to use less sophisticated techniques, ensuring appropriate target coverage, and the choice of more costly techniques could be reserved to selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Buglione
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Sara Pedretti
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Pietro Luigi Poliani
- Pathology Department, University and Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Roberto Liserre
- Neuroradiology Department, University and Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Gipponi
- Neurology Department, University and Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giannantonio Spena
- Neurosurgery Department, University and Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Borghetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Ludovica Pegurri
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Federica Saiani
- Medical Physics Department, Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luigi Spiazzi
- Medical Physics Department, Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giulia Tesini
- Medical Physics Department, Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Chiara Uccelli
- Medical Physics Department, Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Triggiani
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Radiation Oncology Department, University and Spedali Civili, P.le Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Badiyan SN, Markovina S, Simpson JR, Robinson CG, DeWees T, Tran DD, Linette G, Jalalizadeh R, Dacey R, Rich KM, Chicoine MR, Dowling JL, Leuthardt EC, Zipfel GJ, Kim AH, Huang J. Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation for Glioblastoma Multiforme in the Era of Temozolomide. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 90:877-85. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2014] [Revised: 06/24/2014] [Accepted: 07/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
24
|
Brada M, Haylock B. Is current technology improving outcomes with radiation therapy for gliomas? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2014:e89-e94. [PMID: 24857152 DOI: 10.14694/edbook_am.2014.34.e89] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) remains the principal component of glioma treatment, and three-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT) is the current standard of RT delivery. Advances in imaging and in RT technology have enabled more precise treatment to defined targets combined with better means of avoiding critical normal structures, and this is complemented by intensive quality assurance, which includes on-treatment imaging. The refinements of 3DCRT include intensity modulated RT (IMRT), arcing IMRT, and high-precision conformal RT, formerly described as "stereotactic," which can be delivered using a linear accelerator or other specialized equipment. Although proton therapy uses heavy charged particles, the principal application can also be considered as refinement of 3DCRT. The technologies generally improve the dose differential between the tumor and normal tissue and enable more dose-intensive treatments. However, these have not translated into improved survival outcome in patients with low- and high-grade gliomas. More intensive altered fractionation regimens have also failed to show survival benefit. Nevertheless, novel technologies enable better sparing of normal tissue and selective avoidance of critical structures, and these need to be explored further to improve the quality of life of patients with gliomas. Principal clinical advance in RT has been the recognition that less intensive treatments are beneficial for patients with adverse prognosis high-grade gliomas. We conclude that the principal gain of modern RT technology is more likely to emerge as a reduction in treatment related toxicity rather than as an improvement in overall survival; the optimal avoidance strategies remain to be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Brada
- From the University of Liverpool, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Liverpool; Department of Radiation Oncology, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Bebbington, Wirral
| | - Brian Haylock
- From the University of Liverpool, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Liverpool; Department of Radiation Oncology, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Bebbington, Wirral
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ammirati M, Chotai S, Newton H, Lamki T, Wei L, Grecula J. Hypofractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy with temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Neurosci 2013; 21:633-7. [PMID: 24380758 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2013] [Accepted: 09/11/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
We conducted a phase I study to determine (a) the maximum tolerated dose of peri-radiation therapy temozolomide (TMZ) and (b) the safety of a selected hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy (HIMRT) regimen in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. Patients with histological diagnosis of GBM, Karnofsky performance status (KPS)≥ 60 and adequate bone marrow function were eligible for the study. All patients received peri-radiation TMZ; 1 week before the beginning of radiation therapy (RT), 1 week after RT and for 3 weeks during RT. Standard 75 mg/m(2)/day dose was administered to all patients 1 week post-RT. Dose escalation was commenced at level I: 50mg/m(2)/day, level II: 65 mg/m(2)/day and level III: 75 mg/m(2)/day for 4 weeks. HIMRT was delivered at 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions to the contrast enhancing lesion (or surgical cavity) plus the surrounding edema plus a 2 cm margin. Six men and three women with a median age of 67 years (range, 44-81) and a median KPS of 80 (range, 80-90) were enrolled. Three patients were accrued at each TMZ dose level. Median follow-up was 10 months (range, 1-15). Median progression free survival was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9-7.4; range, 0.9-9.9 months) and the overall survival 12.7 months (95% CI: 2.5-17.6; range, 2.5-20.7 months). Time spent in a KPS ≥ 70 was 8.1 months (95% CI: 2.4-15.6; range, 2.4-16 months). No instance of irreversible grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was noted. HIMRT at 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions with peri-RT TMZ at a maximum tolerated dose of 75 mg/m(2)/day for 5 weeks is well tolerated and is able to abate treatment time for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Ammirati
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Medical Center, N1025 Doan Hall, 410 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| | - Silky Chotai
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Medical Center, N1025 Doan Hall, 410 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Herbert Newton
- Department of Neurology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Tariq Lamki
- Dardinger Microneurosurgical Skull Base Laboratory, Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Medical Center, N1025 Doan Hall, 410 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Lai Wei
- Center for Biostatistics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - John Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Polymeric micelles, a promising drug delivery system to enhance bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs. JOURNAL OF DRUG DELIVERY 2013; 2013:340315. [PMID: 23936656 PMCID: PMC3712247 DOI: 10.1155/2013/340315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 267] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2013] [Revised: 06/04/2013] [Accepted: 06/11/2013] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Oral administration is the most commonly used and readily accepted form of drug delivery; however, it is find that many drugs are difficult to attain enough bioavailability when administered via this route. Polymeric micelles (PMs) can overcome some limitations of the oral delivery acting as carriers able to enhance drug absorption, by providing (1) protection of the loaded drug from the harsh environment of the GI tract, (2) release of the drug in a controlled manner at target sites, (3) prolongation of the residence time in the gut by mucoadhesion, and (4) inhibition of efflux pumps to improve the drug accumulation. To explain the mechanisms for enhancement of oral bioavailability, we discussed the special stability of PMs, the controlled release properties of pH-sensitive PMs, the prolongation of residence time with mucoadhesive PMs, and the P-gp inhibitors commonly used in PMs, respectively. The primary purpose of this paper is to illustrate the potential of PMs for delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs with bioavailability being well maintained.
Collapse
|
27
|
Integration method of 3D MR spectroscopy into treatment planning system for glioblastoma IMRT dose painting with integrated simultaneous boost. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8:1. [PMID: 23280007 PMCID: PMC3552736 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-8-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2012] [Accepted: 12/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To integrate 3D MR spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) in the treatment planning system (TPS) for glioblastoma dose painting to guide simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Methods For sixteen glioblastoma patients, we have simulated three types of dosimetry plans, one conventional plan of 60-Gy in 3D conformational radiotherapy (3D-CRT), one 60-Gy plan in IMRT and one 72-Gy plan in SIB-IMRT. All sixteen MRSI metabolic maps were integrated into TPS, using normalization with color-space conversion and threshold-based segmentation. The fusion between the metabolic maps and the planning CT scans were assessed. Dosimetry comparisons were performed between the different plans of 60-Gy 3D-CRT, 60-Gy IMRT and 72-Gy SIB-IMRT, the last plan was targeted on MRSI abnormalities and contrast enhancement (CE). Results Fusion assessment was performed for 160 transformations. It resulted in maximum differences <1.00 mm for translation parameters and ≤1.15° for rotation. Dosimetry plans of 72-Gy SIB-IMRT and 60-Gy IMRT showed a significantly decreased maximum dose to the brainstem (44.00 and 44.30 vs. 57.01 Gy) and decreased high dose-volumes to normal brain (19 and 20 vs. 23% and 7 and 7 vs. 12%) compared to 60-Gy 3D-CRT (p < 0.05). Conclusions Delivering standard doses to conventional target and higher doses to new target volumes characterized by MRSI and CE is now possible and does not increase dose to organs at risk. MRSI and CE abnormalities are now integrated for glioblastoma SIB-IMRT, concomitant with temozolomide, in an ongoing multi-institutional phase-III clinical trial. Our method of MR spectroscopy maps integration to TPS is robust and reliable; integration to neuronavigation systems with this method could also improve glioblastoma resection or guide biopsies.
Collapse
|
28
|
Hingorani M, Colley WP, Dixit S, Beavis AM. Hypofractionated radiotherapy for glioblastoma: strategy for poor-risk patients or hope for the future? Br J Radiol 2012; 85:e770-81. [PMID: 22919020 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/83827377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The prognosis of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor, and the use of hyperfractionation or dose escalation beyond 60 Gy has not conferred any survival benefit. More recently, hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) has been employed as a novel approach for achieving dose escalation, with interesting results. We present here a systematic overview of the role and development of HFRT as a possible therapeutic strategy in patients with GBM. We searched the PubMed database for studies published since 1990 that reported on the tolerance, safety and survival outcomes after HFRT. These studies reported on the paradox of improved survival in patients developing central radionecrosis within the high-dose volume. Most series reported no significant increase in early or late toxicity, except for one study that reported visual loss in one patient at 7 months after treatment. More recently, studies of HFRT combined with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) reported a trend towards improved survival compared with historical controls, with a few studies reporting a median survival of approximately 20 months. The interpretation of data from the above studies is limited by the heterogeneities of patient population and the significant variation in the range of employed dose schedules. However, high-dose HFRT using intensity-modulated radiotherapy appears to be a safe and feasible therapeutic option. There is a suggestion of improved outcomes on combining HFRT with TMZ, which warrants further investigation in a randomised trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hingorani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Massaccesi M, Ferro M, Cilla S, Balducci M, Deodato F, Macchia G, Valentini V, Morganti AG. Accelerated intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma: a phase I dose-escalation study (ISIDE-BT-1). Int J Clin Oncol 2012; 18:784-91. [PMID: 22892797 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-012-0462-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2012] [Accepted: 07/26/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed a dose-escalation trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with standard concurrent and sequential-dose temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. METHODS Histologically proven glioblastoma patients underwent IMRT dose escalation. IMRT was delivered over 5 weeks with the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique to the two planning target volumes (PTVs) defined by adding 5-mm margin to the respective clinical target volumes (CTVs). CTV1 was the tumor bed plus the enhancing lesion with 10-mm margin; CTV2 was the area of perifocal edema with 20-mm margin. Only the PTV1 dose was escalated (planned dose escalation: 60, 62.5, 65, 67.5, 70 Gy) while the PTV2 dose remained the same (45 Gy). RESULTS Forty consecutive glioblastoma patients were treated. While no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was recorded during the dose escalation up to 67.5/2.7 Gy, two out of the first six consecutively enrolled patients on the highest dose level (70/2.8 Gy) experienced a DLT, and therefore a cohort expansion was required. 3/14 patients experienced a DLT on the highest planned dose level, and therefore the MTD was not exceeded. After a median follow-up time of 25 months no grade >2 late neurological toxicity was recorded. CONCLUSIONS By using a SIB IMRT technique, a radiation dose of 70 Gy in 25 fractions (biological effective dose--BED--of 92.8 Gy) can be delivered with concurrent and sequential standard dose TMZ, without unacceptable acute toxicity in patients with glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariangela Massaccesi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Oncology, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura "Giovanni Paolo II", Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 1, 86100, Campobasso, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yu JB, Lloyd S, Decker RH, Wilson LD, Park HS. Comparative Effectiveness Research and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database: what is Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and why is it important? Curr Probl Cancer 2012; 36:208-15. [PMID: 22481005 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2012.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
31
|
KONISHI Y, MURAGAKI Y, ISEKI H, MITSUHASHI N, OKADA Y. Patterns of Intracranial Glioblastoma Recurrence After Aggressive Surgical Resection and Adjuvant Management: Retrospective Analysis of 43 Cases. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2012; 52:577-86. [DOI: 10.2176/nmc.52.577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiyuki KONISHI
- Faculty of Advanced Techno-Surgery, Institute of Advanced Biomedical Engineering and Science, Tokyo Women's Medical University
| | - Yoshihiro MURAGAKI
- Faculty of Advanced Techno-Surgery, Institute of Advanced Biomedical Engineering and Science, Tokyo Women's Medical University
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University
| | - Hiroshi ISEKI
- Faculty of Advanced Techno-Surgery, Institute of Advanced Biomedical Engineering and Science, Tokyo Women's Medical University
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University
| | - Norio MITSUHASHI
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Women's Medical University
| | - Yoshikazu OKADA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University
| |
Collapse
|