Patterns of Failure in Advanced Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients After Complete Response to R-CHOP Immunochemotherapy and the Emerging Role of Consolidative Radiation Therapy

Plasmablastic Lymphoma. A State-of-the-Art Review: Part 2-Focus on Therapy

The objective of this two-part review is to present a current and comprehensive understanding of the diagnosis and management of plasmablastic lymphoma. The first part, which was published previously, focused on the study of epidemiology, etiology, clinicopathological characteristics, differential diagnosis, prognostic variables, and the impact of plasmablastic lymphoma on specific populations. This second part addresses the difficult topic of the treatment of plasmablastic lymphoma, specifically examining both the conventional, consolidated approach and the novel therapeutic strategy.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for refractory or relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective and available local treatment for patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) aggressive B-cell lymphomas. However, the value of hypofractionated RT in this setting has not been confirmed.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma who received hypofractionated RT between January 2020 and August 2022 at a single institution. The objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and acute side effects were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients were included. The median dose for residual disease was 36 Gy, at a dose per fraction of 2.3-5 Gy. After RT, the ORR and complete response (CR) rates were 90% and 80%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 2-27 months), 10 patients (33.3%) experienced disease progression and three died. The 1-year OS and PFS rates for all patients were 81.8% and 66.3%, respectively. The majority (8/10) of post-RT progressions involved out-of-field relapses. Patients with relapsed diseases, no response to systemic therapy, multiple lesions at the time of RT, and no response to RT were associated with out-of-field relapses. PFS was associated with response to RT (P = 0.001) and numbers of residual sites (P < 0.001). No serious non-hematological adverse effects (≥ grade 3) associated with RT were reported.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that hypofractionated RT was effective and tolerable for patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma, especially for those that exhibited localized residual disease.

MYC overexpression but not MYC/BCL2 double expression predicts survival in bulky mass diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients

PURPOSE

The prognostic factors for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have been fully explored, but prognostic information for bulky mass DLBCL patients is limited. This study aimed to analyze the prognostic value of MYC protein expression and other biological parameters in bulky mass DLBCL patients.

METHODS

We defined a bulky mass as a maximum tumor diameter ≥7.5 cm and studied 227 patients with de novo bulky mass DLBCL.

RESULTS

In all patients with bulky mass DLBCL, the 1-year and 3-year OS rates were 72.7% and 57.1%, respectively, and the 1-year and 3-year PFS rates were 52.0% and 42.5%, respectively. The MYC overexpression group (n = 140) showed significantly worse overall survival (OS; p = 0.019) and progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.001) than the non-MYC overexpression group (n = 87). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the MYC overexpression group was associated with inferior OS and PFS in the subgroups with the International Prognostic Index score of 3-5 (OS: p = 0.011; PFS: p < 0.001), Ann Arbor stage 3-4 (OS: p = 0.014; PFS: p < 0.001) and GCB subtype (OS: p = 0.014; PFS: p = 0.010). Consolidation radiotherapy improved OS and PFS in patients with bulky mass DLBCL (OS: p = 0.008; PFS: p = 0.004) as well as in those with MYC overexpression (OS: p = 0.001; PFS: p = 0.001). The prognostic value of MYC overexpression was maintained in a multivariate model adjusted for the International Prognostic Index.

CONCLUSION

MYC overexpression is a poor predictor for bulky mass DLBCL patients. Consolidation radiotherapy for residual disease after induction therapy may improve outcomes for patients with bulky mass DLBCL.

Consolidative Radiotherapy after Complete Remission following R-CHOP Immunochemotherapy in Stage III-IV Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are treated with rituximab in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). The role of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) remains unclear among patients with advanced DLBCL who achieved complete remission (CR) after R-CHOP immunochemotherapy. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify the role of consolidative RT among these patients. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing RT to no RT following CR after R-CHOP immunochemotherapy in Ann Arbor stage III-IV DLBCL patients. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, and disease-free survival (DFS) was the secondary endpoint. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the primary and secondary outcomes. Review Manager (version 5.4) was used to analyze the data. Six retrospective studies involving 813 patients who received R-CHOP ± consolidative RT were identified. OS was higher in the consolidative RT group, with an HR of 2.01 and a 95% CI of 1.30 to 3.12 (p = 0.002). DFS was also higher in the RT group, with an HR of 2.18 and a 95% CI of 1.47 to 3.24 (p < 0.0001). The results suggested that consolidative RT improved OS and DFS compared to no RT among advanced-stage DLBCL patients. Further research is needed to determine the optimal radiation fields and the appropriate indications for consolidative RT for advanced-stage DLBCL patients in the rituximab era.

A phase 1 first-in-human study of GS-0189, an anti-signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) monoclonal antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)

Signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) is the receptor for cluster of differentiation (CD)47, a potent "don't eat me" signal for macrophages. Disruption of CD47-SIRPα signaling in the presence of prophagocytic signals can lead to enhanced phagocytosis of tumor cells, resulting in a direct antitumor effect; agents targeting this pathway have shown efficacy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and other tumor types. GS-0189 is a novel anti-SIRPα humanized monoclonal antibody. Here we report: (1) clinical safety, preliminary activity, and pharmacokinetics of GS-0189 as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab from a phase 1 clinical trial in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL (NCT04502706, SRP001); (2) in vitro characterization of GS-0189 binding to SIRPα; and (3) in vitro phagocytic activity. Clinically, GS-0189 was well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory NHL with evidence of clinical activity in combination with rituximab. Receptor occupancy (RO) of GS-0189 was highly variable in NHL patients; binding affinity studies showed significantly higher affinity for SIRPα variant 1 than variant 2, consistent with RO in patient and healthy donor samples. In vitro phagocytosis induced by GS-0189 was also SIRPα variant-dependent. Although clinical development of GS-0189 was discontinued, the CD47-SIRPα signaling pathway remains a promising therapeutic target and should continue to be explored.

Efficacy and toxicity of infradiaphragmal radiotherapy fields in lymphoma patients: a single-centre experience

PURPOSE

Data on efficacy and toxicity of infradiaphragmal radiotherapy fields in lymphoma patients are scarce. We therefore performed this retrospective study to analyse our experience with radiotherapy exclusively to infradiaphragmal fields.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

we retrospectively evaluated 101 patients treated between 2003 and 2014. Median dose was 36 Gy, range 4 to 54 Gy. Medium dose per fraction was 2 Gy, range 1.5 to 7 Gy.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 66 months (range 1-211 months), we observed lymphoma recurrence in 38 patients (38%), five in the RT field and 33 out-of-field. Recurrences were significantly more frequent in the salvage group (17 out-of-field and 4 in-field in 31 patients) than in adjuvant group (16 out-of-field and 1 in-field in 70 patients; p < 0.001). The 2-, 5- and 10-year event-free survival (EFS) rates were 62%, 56% and 54%. The 2-, 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates for the entire group of patients are 73%, 60% and 54%, respectively. Acute side effects occurred in 43 (43%) patients, most frequent gastrointestinal in 26 (26%) patients. Late side effects occurred in 12 (12%) of all patients, 6 of 23 (26%) followed up for more than 10 years. Six patients developed secondary cancers, four gastrointestinal disturbances, two diabetes mellitus and three renal failure.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with infradiaphragmatic lymphoma providing excellent local disease control with minimal late toxicity. Infradiaphragmatic lymphoma localization should not be regarded as a contraindication for use of radiotherapy. However, patients should be monitored for a secondary malignancy.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of Chinese diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in the era of rituximab (2005-2018)

Background

Rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) regimen has improved the survival of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients worldwide, compared with CHOP alone. Several limitations were seen in previous studies of Chinese DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of Chinese DLBCL patients treated with the standard first-line treatment.

Methods

Clinical data were collected from DLBCL patients who received frontline R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens at the Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CHCAMS) between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018. The treatment outcomes were compared with those of patients diagnosed with DLBCL between 2004 and 2017 and who received immunochemotherapy from the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was performed using Cox proportional hazard regression.

Results

Overall, 1084 patients from the CHCAMS and 4013 patients from the SEER database were included in the study. As of April 30, 2022, the median follow-up period for the CHCAMS group was 87.3 (range: 0.5-195.4) months. For the CHCAMS group, the 5-year PFS and OS rates were 61.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.8-64.7%) and 70.6% (95% CI: 67.8-73.4%), respectively. For the SEER group, the 5-year OS rate was 66.5% (95% CI: 65.0-68.0%), which was inferior to that of the CHCAMS group (P ​< ​0.001). After adjusting for clinical factors and treatment, no significant difference was observed in the OS between the CHCAMS and SEER groups (P ​= ​0.867). In the CHCAMS group, multivariate analysis showed that an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score ≥2, presence of B symptoms, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, elevated serum β2-microglobulin levels, and bulky mass were independent adverse prognostic factors affecting PFS and OS (P ​< ​0.05). Additionally, patients aged over 60 years, elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, and more than two extranodal sites were independent adverse prognostic factors for OS (P ​< ​0.05). Local radiotherapy was significantly associated with better PFS (P ​< ​0.001) and OS (P ​= ​0.001).

Conclusion

After adjusting for clinical and treatment-related factors, no significant difference was observed in the 5-year OS rate between Chinese DLBCL patients treated with standard first-line treatment and those from the SEER database.

Role of Radiation Therapy in Mortality among Adolescents and Young Adults with Lymphoma: Differences According to Cause of Death

Simple Summary

Despite its efficacy, emerging concerns exist regarding radiation therapy (RT)-associated toxicity in adolescent and young adult (AYA) lymphoma patients. However, the most current research studying the association between RT and outcome is based only on groups of lymphoma patients and is not compared with the general population, which could more accurately reveal the impact of RT on outcomes. This population-based analysis showed that after adjusting for potential confounders, RT administration is associated with a low risk of cause-specific mortality, including death due to the original diagnosis, second malignant neoplasms (SMNs), and noncancer causes, among AYA patients with lymphoma. This analysis may play a guiding role in the design of future lymphoma studies and the formulation of healthcare policies regarding the widespread use of RT, especially for AYA survivors.

Abstract

Background: Despite its efficacy, emerging concerns exist regarding radiation therapy (RT)-associated toxicity in adolescent and young adult (AYA) lymphoma patients. Few long-term follow-up studies have examined the association between RT and outcomes. Methods: Lymphoma patients aged 15–39 years were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 1992 to 2016. Mortality was assessed by comparing those with and without RT using the Fine–Gray competing risk model. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were used to assess the relative risk of death compared with the general U.S. population. Results: In total, 29,686 patients were included; 10,708 (36.07%) received RT. Cause-specific mortality was compared between patients with and without RT while considering other competing events, including death due to index cancer, second malignant neoplasms (SMNs), and noncancer causes. Patients with RT had a lower probability of death and crude 5-year cumulative incidence of death. Moreover, there were significantly lower SMRs in patients with RT than in patients without RT. Differences between the two groups were greatest for mortality due to hematological malignancies and infections. Additionally, in the RT cohort, the SMR for index-cancer-related death was highest in the first year after diagnosis and gradually decreased. Hematological malignancies and infections were the most common specific SMN and noncancer causes of death, respectively. Conclusions: RT did not increase mortality from index cancer, SMNs, or noncancer causes in AYA patients with lymphoid malignancies. The current analysis may serve as a reference for healthcare providers monitoring RT application for AYA lymphoid malignancy survivors.

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma of the Frontal Sinus: A Case Report

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the frontal sinus is a very rare malignant tumor with atypical clinical manifestations. It usually involves the orbital and ethmoid sinuses and causes vision loss, visual field damage, and nasal obstruction as the first symptoms. Herein, we report the diagnosis and treatment of a patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the frontal sinus, introduce imaging features of the disease, and discuss the differential diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

Positron Emission Tomography Molecular Imaging for Phenotyping and Management of Lymphoma

Positron emission tomography (PET) represents molecular imaging for non-invasive phenotyping of physiological and biochemical processes in various oncological diseases. PET imaging with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) for glucose metabolism evaluation is the standard imaging modality for the clinical management of lymphoma. One of the ¹⁸F-FDG PET applications is the detection and pre-treatment staging of lymphoma, which is highly sensitive. ¹⁸F-FDG PET is also applied during treatment to evaluate the individual chemo-sensitivity and accordingly guide the response-adapted therapy. At the end of the therapy regiment, a negative PET scan is indicative of a good prognosis in patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Thus, adjuvant radiotherapy may be alleviated. Future PET studies using non-¹⁸F-FDG radiotracers, such as ⁶⁸Ga-labeled pentixafor (a cyclic pentapeptide that enables sensitive and high-contrast imaging of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4), ⁶⁸Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) that reflects the tumor microenvironment, and ⁸⁹Zr-labeled atezolizumab that targets the programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), may complement ¹⁸F-FDG and offer essential tools to decode lymphoma phenotypes further and identify the mechanisms of lymphoma therapy.

A Favorable Outcome of Grade 3 Follicular Lymphoma Treated With Surgery and Obinutuzumab Combined With Chemotherapy: A Case Report and Literature Review

Follicular lymphoma is the most common type of low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma and the second most common type of lymphoma. Primary extranodal follicular lymphoma is rare compared with nodular follicular lymphoma involving the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. There has been uncertainty regarding follicular lymphomas due to the heterogeneous presentation and severity in which they present. However, studies showed that patients diagnosed with primary gastrointestinal follicular lymphoma do not typically differ in their presentation from those diagnosed with nodular follicular lymphoma involving the GI tract. Furthermore, recent literature identifies that patients diagnosed with grade 3 follicular lymphoma tend to have similar genetic and molecular entities to those diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Based on these results, current studies have shown that patients with grade 3 follicular lymphoma who are treated with anthracycline-based regimens have similar outcomes to those with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, additional studies are warranted to demonstrate the benefit of managing grade 3 follicular lymphoma with more aggressive anthracycline/rituximab-based regimens. Here, we present a case of a 44-year-old male diagnosed with grade 3 follicular lymphoma involving the gastrointestinal tract, who demonstrated an excellent treatment response following therapy similar to the treatment of bulky diffuse large B-cell lymphoma despite a tumor burden size below 7.5 cm.

PET-guided treatment for personalised therapy of Hodgkin lymphoma and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma

FDG-PET scanning has a central role in lymphoma staging and response assessment. There is a growing body of evidence that PET response assessment during and after initial systemic therapy can provide useful prognostic information, and PET response has an evolving role in guiding patient care. This review provides a perspective on the role of PET response assessment for individualised management of patients with the most common aggressive lymphomas, Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

'Le Roi est mort, vive le Roi': New Roles of Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Lymphomas in Combination With Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

immunotherapy (IT), including checkpoint inhibitors (CIs) and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) revolutionized the treatment of relapsing or refractory (r/r) lymphoma. Several preliminary experiences evaluated concomitant administration of radiotherapy and IT.

METHODS

we performed a systematic review of current literature as of March 30, 2020. A total of 1090 records was retrieved, 42 articles were selected on the basis of title and abstract and, after the removal of analyses with no original data or insufficient clinical information, 28 papers were included in the review.

RESULTS

previous studies were mostly represented by case reports/series or small cohorts. Nonetheless, combination of radiotherapy and CIs or CAR-T led to promising outcomes, resulting in extremely high rates of complete response and improving progression free and overall survival compared with data from recent clinical trials. Combination of RT and CIs had a fair toxicity profile with no reports of severe side effects. Within the limits of the small cohorts retrieved, RT seems a superior option compared with systemic treatment as a 'bridge' to CAR-T and could as well reduce severe complications rates. Radiotherapy could elicit immune response against lymphoma, as demonstrated by multiple cases of abscopal effect and its inclusion in anti-neoplastic vaccines protocols.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review warrant the evaluation of combination of RT and immunotherapy in larger and preferably prospective and randomized cohorts to confirm these preliminary impressive outcomes. The optimal dose, fractionation and timing of RT still have to be clarified.

Improved Progression-Free Survival for Bulky and Non-Bulky Advanced Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma With Consolidative Radiation Therapy: A Bi-Institutional Analysis

Background The role of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) for advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is not fully established. A growing body of data suggests a role for consolidative RT in select stage III-IV DLBCL patients and emerging data from randomized studies further address the role of RT in advanced-stage patients initially presenting with bulky disease. Methods Patients with treatment-naive stage III-IV DLBCL treated at two institutions who achieved a clinically complete response to systemic therapy were included. Patients with either bulky or non-bulky disease were included, but those with the relapsed or refractory disease were excluded. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the impact of consolidative RT. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results One hundred eighty-eight patients received systemic therapy consisting of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP; 79%), another rituximab-based regimen (9%), or chemotherapy alone (12%). Clinical response was assessed using conventional CT or PET-CT. Sixty-eight patients (36%) received consolidative RT (median dose 30 Gy). Consolidative RT conferred a 36.7% absolute benefit in five-year progression-free survival (PFS; 85.9% vs. 49.2%, log rank p < 0.0001), a 14.5% absolute benefit in five-year overall survival (OS; 87.4% vs. 72.9%, log rank p = 0.0134), and a 37.0% absolute benefit in five-year LC (91.9% vs. 54.9%, log rank p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, consolidative RT was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.10-0.52, p < 0.001) and LC (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.59, p = 0.003). Patients receiving consolidative RT demonstrated significantly improved PFS for tumors measuring both <5 cm (log rank p = 0.0454) and ≥5 cm (log rank p = 0.0003). Conclusions For patients with stage III-IV DLBCL who achieve clinical complete response after systemic therapy, consolidative RT improves PFS for all patients, including those with the non-bulky disease. This benefit persists in the setting of rituximab-based systemic therapy.

Patterns and Predictors of Failure in Recurrent or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphomas following Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy

PURPOSE

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy is capable of eliciting durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) lymphomas. However, the majority of treated patients relapse. Patterns of failure following CAR T have not been previously characterized and may provide insights into the mechanisms of resistance guiding future treatment strategies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Retrospective analysis of R/R large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with anti-CD19 CAR T at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center from 2015 to 2019. Pre- and post-treatment PET/CTs were analyzed to assess the progression of existing (local failures) versus new, non-overlapping lesions (de novo failures) and to identify lesions at high-risk for progression.

RESULTS

A total of 469 pretreatment lesions in 63 patients were identified. At a median follow-up of 12•6 months, 36 (57%) patients recurred. The majority (n=31, 86%) had a component of local failure with 13 (36%) patients exhibiting strictly local failures. Even at progression, 84% of recurrent patients continued to have a subset of pretreatment lesions maintain PET/CT resolution. Lesions at high-risk for local failure included those with a diameter ≥5cm (OR 2•34, 95%CI 1•55-3•55; p<0•001), an SUV_max≥10 (OR 2•08, 95%CI 1•38-3•12; p<0•001), or that were extranodal (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.10-2.04; p=0.01). In the 69 patients eligible for survival analysis, those with any lesion ≥5cm (n=46, 67%) experienced inferior PFS (HR 2•41, 95%CI 1•15-5•04; p=0•02) and OS (HR 3•36, 95%CI 1•17-9•96; p=0•02).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients who recur following CAR T experience a component of local progression. Furthermore, lesions with high-risk features, particularly large size, were associated with inferior treatment efficacy and patient survival. Taken together, these observations suggest that lesion-specific resistance may contribute to CAR T treatment failure. Locally-directed therapies to high-risk lesions, such as radiotherapy, may be a viable strategy to prevent CAR T failures in select patients.

Long-term results of PET-guided radiation in patients with advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP

Consolidative radiation therapy (RT) for advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains controversial, with routine practice continuing to include RT in patients with initial bulky disease or residual masses. Positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography is a sensitive modality for detecting the presence of residual disease at the end of treatment (EOT). A PET-guided approach to selectively administering RT has been the policy in British Columbia since 2005. Patients with advanced-stage DLBCL diagnosed from 1 January 2005 to 1 March 2017 and treated with at least 6 cycles of R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone plus rituximab), who underwent EOT PET, were included in this analysis. Those with complete metabolic response (PET-negative [PET-NEG]) were observed; those with PET-positive (PET-POS) scans were offered consolidative RT, when feasible. Of the patient records reviewed, 723 were identified, with median follow-up of 4.3 years: 517 (72%) were PET-NEG; 206 (28%) were PET-POS. Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) at 3 years were 83% vs 56% and 87% vs 64%, in patients with PET-NEG and PET-POS scans, respectively. PET-POS patients with nonprogressing disease treated with consolidative RT (109 and 206; 53%) had outcomes approaching those of PET-NEG patients, with 3-year estimates of 76% and 80% for TTP and OS. PET-NEG patients who had bulky disease (≥10 cm) at diagnosis had outcomes indistinguishable from those without bulk, despite the omission of RT. These data suggest that patients with advanced-stage DLBCL who are PET-NEG at EOT and receive no RT have excellent outcomes. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET can reliably guide selective administration of consolidative RT, even in patients with initially bulky disease.

Radiotherapy for Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Radiotherapy (RT) plays a diverse and essential role in the contemporary management of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and remains the single most powerful monotherapeutic intervention for both aggressive and indolent subtypes. Over the past decade, there have been significant advancements in radiation oncology practice, which have made modern treatments safer and more conformal. Despite this sophistication and evidence supporting a continued role for RT, numerous data suggest that utilization is on the decline. In this review, we discuss the rationale for RT in 4 commonly encountered scenarios: combined modality therapy for limited-stage aggressive NHL, consolidation therapy for advanced-stage aggressive NHL, and the changing roles of salvage RT for relapsed/refractory NHL in an era of new frontiers such as cellular therapies. We also evaluate current strategies to treat indolent histologies. We conclude with perspectives on how RT for the hematological malignancies may continue to evolve.

Treatment Modalities and Survival Outcomes for Sinonasal Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

This study utilizes a large population national database to comprehensively analyze prognosticators and overall survival (OS) outcomes of varying treatment modalities in a large cohort of sinonasal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (SN-DLBCL) patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database study.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for all SN-DLBCL cases diagnosed from 2004 to 2015. Kaplan-Meier log-rank test determined differences in OS based on clinical covariates. Cox proportional-hazards analysis was used to determine clinical and sociodemographic covariates predictive of mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 2,073 SN-DLBCL patients were included, consisting of 48% female with a mean age of 66.0 ± 16.2 years. Overall, 82% of patients were Caucasian, 74% had early-stage disease, and 49% had primary tumors in the paranasal sinuses. Early-stage patients were more likely to receive multi-agent chemoradiotherapy compared to multi-agent chemotherapy alone (P < .001). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards analysis revealed chemoradiotherapy to confer significantly greater OS improvements than chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; P < .001). However, subset analysis of late-stage patients demonstrated no significant differences in OS between these treatment modalities (P = .245). On multivariable analysis of chemotherapy patients treated post-2012, immunotherapy (HR = 0.51; P = .024) demonstrated significant OS benefits. However, subset analysis showed no significant advantage in OS with administering immunotherapy for late-stage patients (P = .326). Lastly, for all patients treated post-2012, those receiving immunotherapy had significantly improved OS compared to those not receiving immunotherapy (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment protocol selection differs between early- and late-stage SN-DLBCL patients. Early-stage patients receiving chemotherapy may benefit from immunotherapy as part of their treatment paradigm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Laryngoscope, 2021.

Emerging Role of Consolidative Radiotherapy After Complete Remission Following R-CHOP Immunochemotherapy in Stage III-IV Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Single Institutional and Case-Matched Control Study

Purpose

The role of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) after complete-remission (CR) following rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed the survival outcomes and patterns of failure with our institutional experience.

Material and Methods

Between 2009 and 2018, 206 patients with stage III-IV DLBCL achieved CR after receiving R-CHOP. Propensity-score matching was used to analyze the role of consolidative RT. The consolidative RT group (n = 34) and the R-CHOP alone group (n = 68) were matched at a 1:2 ratio. After propensity-score matching, 102 patients were analyzed.

Results

With a median follow-up of 39.7 months, 26 patients (25.5%) showed local recurrence. Only one patient failed at the previous RT field. RT was delivered to bulky sites, head and neck lesions, testes, and bone with median dose of 30.6 Gy. The most common site of failure was head and neck lesions followed by bulky sites. The 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and isolated-local recurrence free survival (LRFS) were 73.5, 64.0, and 79.9%. In univariate and multivariate analysis, bone marrow involvement and consolidative RT were associated with isolated LRFS (p = 0.006 and 0.032) significantly.

Conclusion

Consolidative RT improved isolated local control. Based on the pattern of failure, we carefully suggest to radiate on initially involved bulky sites or head and neck lesions. Further studies need to be done to find out the optimal radiation dose and selection of RT site.

Pattern of failure and optimal treatment strategy for primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The optimal treatment for primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PG-DLBCL) is still unknown. We evaluated unfavorable prognostic factors and pattern of failure in PG-DLBCL to determine the optimal treatment strategy.

METHODS

Between April 2001 and November 2018, 120 patients with complete remission following rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. According to the Lugano staging system, 80 patients (66.7%) had localized disease and 40 patients (33.3%) had advanced disease. A total of 93 (77.5%) patients had single gastric lesion and 27 (22.5%) patients had multiple gastric lesions. Ninety patients (75%) were treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy alone and 30 patients (25%) received R-CHOP chemotherapy with additional local treatment for gastric lesions.

RESULTS

The 5-year locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates in patients treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy with local treatment were 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, whereas the LRFS, PFS, and OS rates in patients treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy alone were 86.3%, 78.2%, and 87.4%, respectively (p = 0.031, p = 0.095, and p = 0.025, respectively). During the follow-up period, 17 patients (14.2%) had disease recurrence. Only 3 of the 17 patients had relapse in a completely new site without relapse in the initial involved site. All, except 2, cases of local recurrence included gastric failure. In the multivariate analysis, performance status and number of gastric lesions were independent prognostic factors for treatment outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with complete remission following R-CHOP chemotherapy showed a good prognosis. The main pattern of failure in patients with PG-DLBCL was local recurrence, especially in the stomach. Patients who received local treatment for gastric lesions showed improved gastric control. Therefore, in patients with unfavorable prognostic factors, we recommend R-CHOP chemotherapy with additional local treatment for gastric lesions.

Association of progression-free or event-free survival with overall survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after immunochemotherapy: a systematic review

To investigate progression-free survival (PFS) and event-free survival (EFS) as early efficacy endpoints in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), this systematic review included phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), phase II trials, and retrospective studies in newly diagnosed DLBCL receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy through databases search up to 2019. Quality control was performed, where studies with high risk of bias were excluded. Prediction models were first established using the RCTs, and then externally validated in the phase II and retrospective populations. Trial-level surrogacy analysis was conducted by correlating the logarithmic (log) hazard ratio (HR) for PFS or EFS and log HR for OS. Correlation analysis at treatment arm-level was performed between 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year PFS or EFS rates and 5-year OS. The correlation was evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient r in weighted linear regression, with weight equal to patient size. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the consistency of predictive model by leaving one subgroup of trials out at a time. Twenty-six phase III RCTs, 4 phase II trials and 47 retrospective studies were included. In trial-level surrogacy, PFS (r, 0.772; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.471-0.913) or EFS (r, 0.838; 95% CI, 0.625-0.938) were associated with OS. For rituximab immunochemotherapy treatment arms in RCTs, there was a linear correlation between 1 and 5-year PFS (r, 0.813-0.873) or EFS (r, 0.853-0.931) and 5-year OS. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated reasonable overall consistency. The correlation between PFS and OS was externally validated using independent phase II, and retrospective data (r, 0.795-0.897). We recommend PFS and EFS as earlier efficacy endpoints in patients with DLBCL primarily treated with rituximab-containing immunochemotherapy.

A multi-institutional analysis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with consolidative radiotherapy and the impact of cell-of-origin on outcomes

Background

Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with bulky disease and/or those who fail to achieve complete response benefit from the addition of radiotherapy (RT). We aim to review the outcome, as well as determine the impact of cell-of-origin, on patients undergoing consolidative RT.

Patients and methods

Patients with DLBCL treated with radical intent consolidative RT were included. Clinical, pathological and treatment characteristics were extracted from electronic medical records. Survival outcomes and factors that predict for disease-free survival (DFS) were analysed.

Results

Seventy-four patients were included in this analysis. The median follow up was 3 years (0.7–16 years). Fifty-eight percent of patients had stage I–II disease, and 61% received at least 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Cell-of-origin was discernible in 60% of patients, and approximately half were classified as Germinal centre origin. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of this group was excellent at 92% (median survival not reached). The 5-year DFS was 73% (95% CI 57–83%). Seven percent (n = 5) of patients experienced local recurrence at a median time of 6 months. Failure to achieve complete response post RT and/or initial bulky disease are significant predictors of inferior DFS. There was no association between cell-of-origin and DFS or OS.

Conclusions

The outcome of patients who received radiotherapy as consolidation is excellent. Patients who fail to achieve complete response after radiotherapy had poorer outcomes. Despite using radiotherapy, presence of bulky disease remains a significant predictor of disease recurrence. We did not find any association of poorer outcomes, with regards to cell-of-origin, in the use of consolidative RT.

FDG-PET/CT in the management of lymphomas: current status and future directions

FDG-PET/CT is the current state-of-the-art imaging in lymphoma and plays a central role in treatment decisions. At diagnosis, accurate staging is crucial for appropriate therapy selection: FDG-PET/CT can identify areas of lymphoma missed by CT alone and avoid under-treatment of patients with advanced disease stage who would have been misclassified as having limited stage disease by CT. Particularly in Hodgkin lymphoma, positive interim FDG-PET/CT scans are adversely prognostic for clinical outcomes and can inform PET-adapted treatment strategies, but such data are less consistent in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The use of quantitative FDG-PET/CT metrics using metabolic tumour volume, possibly in combination with other biomarkers, may better define prognostic subgroups and thus facilitate better treatment selection. After chemotherapy, FDG-PET/CT response is predictive of outcome and may identify a subgroup who benefit from consolidative radiotherapy. Novel therapies, in particular immunotherapies, exhibit different response patterns than conventional chemotherapy, which has led to modified response criteria that take into account the risk of transient pseudo-progression. In relapsed lymphoma, FDG-PET/CT after second-line therapy and prior to high-dose therapy is also strongly associated with outcome and may be used to guide intensity of salvage therapy in relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma. Currently, FDG-PET/CT has no role in the routine follow-up after complete metabolic response to therapy, but it remains a powerful tool for excluding relapse if patients develop clinical features suggestive of disease relapse. In conclusion, FDG-PET/CT plays major roles in the various phases of management of lymphoma and constitutes a step towards the pursuit of personalized treatment.

INFRADIAPHRAGMAL RADIOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH LYMPHOMA: VOLUME DEFINITION AND SIDE EFFECTS

SUMMARY – Lymphomas are very radiosensitive and radiotherapy (RT) was the first treatment modality that enabled cure. It is the most effective single modality for local control of lymphomas. However, as a local form of treatment, curative intention is only possible if all lymphoma tissue can be incorporated in the volume to be irradiated with the prescribed total irradiation dose. That is why RT is a single modality only in early stage of nodular lymphocyte predominance Hodgkin’s lymphoma and low grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. In most patients, RT can be used as consolidation therapy after chemotherapy or as salvage after failure of chemotherapy. In the past two decades, irradiation techniques have been improved in order to spare critical tissues and reduce toxicity. Although effective, RT is a neglected modality of treatment because of the appearance of new drugs and fear of side effects after irradiation. Radiation has been shown to be effective in the treatment of all stages and forms of lymphoma. Study data are still mostly derived from patients that received supradiaphragmal RT; therefore, there is no agreement about the best management approach in patients with infradiaphragmal lymphoma.

An evidence-based review on the value of interim FDG-PET in assessing response to therapy in lymphoma

Assessing response to therapy in lymphoma is important for determining patients' prognosis, guiding subsequent treatment, and may be used as an outcome measure of prognostic and therapeutic trials. Traditionally, computed tomography was the mainstay for response assessment and was predominantly performed at the end of treatment, whereas the most recent guidelines propose ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for this purpose. However, the value of FDG-PET performed during treatment (interim FDG-PET) is still a topic of debate. The purpose of this scientific communication is to provide an evidence-based overview of the value of interim FDG-PET in patients with lymphoma. The article first describes the development of imaging-based response assessment in lymphoma, the rationale and limitations of using FDG-PET for this purpose, and continues with the evidence-based clinical utility of interim FDG-PET in three major lymphoma subtypes (Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma), and finishes with conclusions and recommendations for standard care and future research.

The role of radiotherapy as salvage and/or consolidation treatment in relapsed/refractory and high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

Many salvage therapies have been proposed for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphomas or for consolidation in the case of suboptimal response. Radiotherapy (RT) is one modality of salvage therapy, but its place is currently not well defined.

METHOD

This study reports a retrospective review of patients receiving unplanned radiotherapy for R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), or as consolidation therapy after second-line chemotherapy, treated in our hospital.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with a median age of 53.5 years [19-89] were selected. The histologic type was DLBCL in 35 cases (68%), PMBCL in 8 cases (16%), and secondary transformed NHL in 8 cases (16%). Median aaIPI was 1 [0-4], and 17 patients (33%) had a high tumor burden (bulky disease). Sixteen patients (31%) were irradiated for a response considered to be insufficient, 18 patients (36%) were refractory, and 17 patients (33%) had relapsed. Patients were irradiated with a median dose of 40 Gy [15-44], 29 (57%) by a conformal 3D technique and 22 (43%) by tomotherapy. With a median follow-up of 36 months [1.0-127.8] after irradiation, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 62% and 72%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, adverse factors associated with PFS and OS in our cohort were age >70 years (HR = 5.06, P = .02) and post-RT relapse (HR = 12.24, P = .002), whereas favorable factors were number of lines of chemotherapy <3 (HR = 0.02, P = .03) and bulky disease (HR = 0.02, P = .009).

CONCLUSION

Due to its low toxicity and ease of use, radiotherapy should therefore remain an available option in patients with R/R DLBCL or as consolidation therapy in patients with high-risk disease, mostly in patients with chemo-sensitive disease or bulky disease.

Retracted article: Adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in advanced stage (III/IV) improves the outcome in the rituximab era

Statement of Retraction: Adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in advanced stage (III/IV) improves the outcome in the rituximab era We, the Editor[s] and Publisher of Hematology, have retracted the following article: Avilès, A, Nambo, M-J, Calva, A, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in advanced stage (III/IV) improves the outcome in the rituximab era. Hematology. 2019;24:507-511; DOI: 10.1080/10245332.2018.1423880 The above article has been retracted as a result of concerns regarding the data upon which the presented research has been based. After re-examination and several independent expert reviews the consensus is that the data and results are not reliable and therefore the article must be retracted. The authors have agreed with this decision. We have been informed in our decision-making by our policy on publishing ethics and integrity and the COPE guidelines on retractions. The retracted article will remain online to maintain the scholarly record, but it will be digitally watermarked on each page as "Retracted".

Consolidation radiotherapy for advanced-stage aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Patients with advanced aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) are usually treated with rituximab in combination with chemotherapy. However, disease relapse rates are high. Radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to be efficacious in treating early-stage NHL but its role in advanced stage diseases is unclear. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chemotherapy with RT to chemotherapy alone in patients with newly diagnosed advanced aggressive NHL. We searched online databases and pooled similar outcome estimates. For time-to-event outcomes, we estimated hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) using the fixed-effect model. Two RCTs involving 254 patients met inclusion criteria. The trials were single-centre RCTs with follow-up period of five and ten years. Both trials were conducted in the pre-rituximab era. Patients treated with consolidation RT had better OS (HR for mortality 0.61; 95 % CI 0.38 to 0.97) and EFS (HR for mortality 0.67; 95 % CI 0.46 to 0.98) compared to those who received no RT. There was an apparent benefit of RT on local control (OR 0.09; 95 % CI 0.04 to 0.20); although this was estimated as a dichotomous rather than time-to-event outcome. Limited evidence shows benefits of consolidation RT in advanced aggressive NHL. However, we were not able to estimate the effect size with confidence due to small number of trials and sample size. We cannot recommend routine consolidation RT in advanced aggressive NHL. More RCTs with the inclusion of rituximab and PET-CT monitoring are needed.

Consolidative Radiotherapy to Residual Masses After Chemotherapy Is Associated With Improved Outcome in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. A Retrospective, Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

The role of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) in advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is not established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a population-based retrospective analysis of patients with DLBCL in Western Norway during 2003 to 2008, 170 consecutive patients admitted to Haukeland University Hospital (HUS) and 94 to Stavanger University Hospital (SUS) were included. The mean age was 64 years (range, 17-95 years), 147 patients (56%) were male, 80 patients (30%) had stage I/II, 126 patients (48%) stage III/IV, and 57 patients (22%) had primary extranodal disease.

RESULTS

There were no differences between hospitals in patient characteristics, use of rituximab, number of chemotherapy courses or cumulative doses, or in distribution of response categories after chemotherapy. The use of RT was significantly different: 17 patients (23%) received RT at SUS and 92 patients (65%) at HUS (P < .001). For 219 patients with International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of 0 to 3, 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 67% at SUS and 81% at HUS (P = .012). For 73 patients with complete response after chemotherapy there were no differences in survival between patients with and without RT. For 138 patients with any residual mass after chemotherapy, there were highly significant differences in favor of receiving RT (n = 81) versus no RT (n = 57): 5-year CSS 89% versus 69% (P < .001), and 5-year overall survival 82% versus 59% (P = .005). The effect of RT on residual mass was evident in most subgroups, mainly in low to intermediate risk, but not in high-risk (IPI 4-5) patients.

CONCLUSION

With the limitations of a retrospective study, these data suggest that consolidative RT might improve survival in DLBCL patients with a residual mass after chemotherapy, also in advanced disease.

Treatment outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma involving the head and neck: Two-institutional study for the significance of radiotherapy after R-CHOP chemotherapy

This study was performed to analyze the treatment outcome for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) involving the head and neck and to evaluate the role of radiotherapy in the rituximab era. Fifty-six patients diagnosed with DLBCL involving the head and neck were assessed. All patients were treated with 6 cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP). After chemotherapy, radiation was delivered to the head and neck area in a median dose of 36 Gy. Radiation was delivered using 3-dimensional radiotherapy (n  =  25) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (n  =  31). Primary endpoints were relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and local control rate. After median follow-up time of 45 months, the 5-year RFS and OS rates were 72% and 61%, respectively. Fourteen (25%) of 56 patients relapsed; 1 had a local relapse, 11 had distant relapses, and 2 had both local and distant relapses. The final local control rate after radiotherapy was 94%. Age, performance status, international prognostic index score, and radiotherapy response were significant prognostic factors for both RFS and OS in the multivariate analysis. Incidence of acute grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicity was 9% and 4%, respectively. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity occurred in 2 (4%) patients, and there was no grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity for the irradiated patients. Excellent local control and survival rates can be achieved with R-CHOP followed by radiotherapy in patients with DLBCL involving the head and neck. Treatment-related toxicity after the introduction of modern radiotherapy was acceptable and limited.

Male Breast Cancer as a Second Primary Cancer: Increased Risk Following Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Male breast cancer (MBC) as a second primary cancer (SPC) has a known association with prior MBC. However, its association with non-breast index malignancies, relative to population risk, has not been previously reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (9 catchment area) data, we identified MBCs diagnosed from 1973-2012 as their SPC. Information regarding the index malignancy was also obtained. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) of MBC as SPC were estimated, along with incidence rates and trends. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival.

RESULTS

Over a 38-year period, 464 MBCs were identified as SPC. The most common index malignancies were breast (SIR 30.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.50-42.92, p < .001), lymphoma (SIR 1.58, 95% CI 1.08-2.22, p = .014), melanoma (SIR 1.26, 95% CI 0.80-1.89), urinary (SIR 1.05, 95% CI 0.74-1.43), colorectal (SIR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.24), and prostate (SIR 0.93 95% CI 0.81-1.07). Apart from the known association with prior breast cancer, the only significant association was with lymphoma as an index cancer, although not significant with a Bonferroni correction. From 1975-2012, incidence of breast cancer as a first cancer increased at an annual percentage change of 1.3% while breast cancer as a SPC increased at 4.7% (both p values < .001).

CONCLUSION

Male breast cancer as a SPC has increased markedly over 4 decades. Men with a history of lymphoma may experience higher-than-expected rates of breast SPC. These observations warrant further research, and suggest possible etiologic connections with disease biology, prior therapy, or genetics.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study reports that men are presenting more frequently to the clinic with breast cancer, both as an initial cancer and as a second cancer following an earlier malignancy. We also report the novel observation that men who survive lymphoma are at increased risk of developing a subsequent breast cancer. Further work is needed to better understand possible treatment or biologic causes of this association. More immediately, these findings suggest the need for heightened vigilance for male breast cancer overall and, in particular, for male lymphoma survivors.

Analysis of prognostic value of complete response by PET-CT and further stratification by clinical and biological markers in DLBCL patients

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is performed as the standard method for response assessment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. However, a substantial proportion of patients experience relapse even if they have achieved complete response (CR) defined by PET-CT. We validated the prognostic value of CR by PET-CT and applied the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) and cell of origin (COO) to patients with CR by PET-CT to evaluate their additional predictive ability for survival outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed DLBCL patients who were treated with R-CHOP or an R-CHOP-like regimen and who achieved CR by PET-CT or CT only. A total of 185 patients were analyzed: 114 patients achieved CR by PET-CT and 71 patients by CT only. Patients with CR by PET-CT had significantly better overall survival (OS) than those with CR by CT (5-year OS, 87.5 vs. 62.4%, P = 0.003). Patients with high risk according to the NCCN-IPI had a dismal outcome despite achieving CR by PET-CT (5-year OS, 61.8%). In contrast, low-, low-intermediate-, and high-intermediate-risk patients had excellent outcomes (5-year OS, 100, 89.7, and 93.5%, respectively). Among patients with CR by PET-CT, patients with germinal center B cell (GCB) DLBCL (n = 40) had significantly better survival than those with non-GCB DLBCL (n = 57) (5-year OS, 96.9 vs. 75.5%, P = 0.039). We demonstrated that CR by PET-CT was a better predictor of survival outcomes than CR by CT only. The NCCN-IPI and COO subtypes could identify a subpopulation of poor-risk patients among those who achieved CR by PET-CT.

Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET in R-CHOP-treated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the prognostic value of interim (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP). MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for suitable studies. Included studies were methodologically appraised, and results were summarized both descriptively and meta-analytically. Nine studies, comprising a total of 996 R-CHOP-treated DLBCL patients, were included. Overall, studies were of moderate methodological quality. The area under the summary receiver operating curve (AUC) of interim FDG-PET in predicting treatment failure and death were 0.651 and 0.817, respectively. There was no heterogeneity in diagnostic odds ratios across available studies (I(2)=0.0%). At multivariable analysis, 2 studies reported interim FDG-PET to have independent prognostic value in addition to the International Prognostic Index (IPI) in predicting treatment failure, whereas 3 studies reported that this was not the case. One study reported interim FDG-PET to have independent prognostic value in addition to the IPI in predicting death, whereas 2 studies reported that this was not the case. In conclusion, interim FDG-PET in R-CHOP-treated DLBCL has some correlation with outcome, but its prognostic value is homogeneously suboptimal across studies and it has not consistently proven to surpass the prognostic potential of the IPI. Moreover, there is a lack of studies that compared interim FDG-PET to the recently developed and superior National Comprehensive Cancer Network-IPI. Therefore, at present there is no scientific base to support the clinical use of interim FDG-PET in R-CHOP-treated DLBCL.

Changes in treatment patterns and impact of radiotherapy for early stage diffuse large B cell lymphoma after Rituximab: A population-based analysis

PURPOSE

Use of Rituximab for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has improved outcomes and led to further questions regarding the benefit of consolidative radiation therapy (RT). This study sought to determine changes in RT utilization following the incorporation of Rituximab for treatment of early stage DLBCL and to examine survival outcomes.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We included patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, diagnosed with Stage I-II DLBCL between 1992 and 2011. Linear regression was performed to determine rate of RT utilization over time during the pre- and post-Rituximab eras (1992-2001 vs. 2002-2011). Kaplan-Meier and Cox Regression were performed to compare overall survival (OS) for patients treated with or without RT. Propensity-score matching was used to compare survival outcomes to account for indication bias.

RESULTS

34,680 patients met the specified criteria. RT utilization was 35.2% in the pre-Rituximab era and 29.9% in the post-Rituximab era (​P<0.001). Linear regression revealed that in the pre-Rituximab era the slope of the best fit line for RT utilization by year was positive (m=0.01, ​P=0.0046), while the slope was negative in the post-Rituximab era (m=-0.008, ​P=0.0102). RT use was associated with improved OS in both the pre-Rituximab era (hazard ratio [HR]=0.797; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.756-0.841) and the post-Rituximab era (HR=0.745; 95% CI 0.702-0.789). Propensity-score matched analysis confirmed that RT use improved OS in the pre-Rituximab era (HR=0.844; 95% CI 0.793-0.897) and post-Rituximab era (0.754; 95% CI 0.703-0.809).

CONCLUSION

RT utilization has decreased following incorporation of Rituximab for first line treatment of DLBCL. RT use is associated with improved OS in both pre- and post-Rituximab eras, suggesting that RT should continue to be used for management of early stage DLBCL, even in the era of Rituximab.