Volume, Dose, and Fractionation Considerations for IMRT-based Reirradiation in Head and Neck Cancer: A Multi-institution Analysis

Recurrent Versus Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Evolving Landscape and the Role of Immunotherapy

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is among the ten most common cancers worldwide, with advanced SCCHN presenting with a 5-year survival of 34% in the case of nodal involvement and 8% in the case of metastatic disease. Disease-free survival at 2 years is 67% for stage II and 33% for stage III tumors, whereas 12-30% of patients undergo distant failures after curative treatment. Previous treatments often hinder the success of salvage surgery and/or reirradiation, while the standard of care for the majority of metastatic SCCHN remains palliative chemo- and immuno-therapy, with few patients eligible for locoregional treatments. The aim of this paper is to review the characteristics of recurrent SCCHN, based on different recurrence sites, and metastatic disease; we will also explore the possibilities not only of salvage surgery and reirradiation but also systemic therapy choices and locoregional treatment for metastatic SCCHN.

Pharyngeal Constrictor-Sparing Salvage Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Tongue-Out for In-Field Recurrence After Definitive Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Guide to Tongue-Out Radiation Therapy

This report details a pharyngeal constrictor muscle (PCM)-sparing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using our institutional technique of "tongue-out" radiation therapy (TORT) for treating a local recurrent cancer in the uvula (GTVuvula) in a patient with history of a definitive chemotherapy with radiation therapy (70 Gy with weekly cisplatin) for a locally advanced laryngeal cancer 4 years ago. TORT includes optimizing the patients' reproducible tongue-out position using readily available medicine cup (30 cc) followed by sculping the thermoplastic mask with tongue-out, and real-time visual monitoring of the tongue position during the computed tomography simulation scan, cone beam computed tomography acquisition, and treatment. Between arcs during volumetric modulated arc therapy, time for tongue relaxation and saliva swallowing can be given to the patient. Without TORT, the patient's GTVuvula abutted the medial aspect of superior PCM (medial-sPCM) and a substantial volume of the previously irradiated superior PCM (sPCM) would have received high radiation dose from this salvage SBRT (32.5 Gy in 5 fractions). Comparing without TORT, the shortest distance between medial-sPCM-to-GTVuvula was increased by 13 mm with TORT, which reduced radiation dose to sPCM in the salvage SBRT plan. The mean dose to sPCM was decreased from 20.5 Gy without TORT to 12.7 Gy with TORT. With TORT, minimal sPCM volumes fell within higher isodose line: volume receiving ≥ 60% prescription dose (V60%Rx), V80%Rx, and V100%Rx to sPCM was, 4.8 versus 0.7 cc (without vs with TORT, respectively), 2.9 versus 0.19 cc, and 1.6 versus 0.04 cc, respectively. Maximum dose (Dmax) to medial-sPCM was 34.6 Gy without TORT versus 22.7 Gy with TORT. These high doses to the sPCM and intrafractional swallowing-related geographic misses of GTVuvula were avoided through the application of TORT in this salvage reirradiation setting. The patient successfully finished salvage SBRT with TORT resulting in no dysphagia or mucositis and maintained complete response at 12 months after treatment.

A nomogram based on pretreatment radiomics and dosiomics features for predicting overall survival associated with esophageal squamous cell cancer

OBJECTIVES

To propose a nomogram-based survival prediction model for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy using pretreatment computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET) radiomics and dosiomics features, and common clinical factors.

METHODS

Radiomics and dosiomics features were extracted from CT and PET images and dose distribution from 2 institutions. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) with logistic regression was used to select radiomics and dosiomics features by calculating the radiomics and dosiomics scores (Rad-score and Dos-score), respectively, in the training model. The model was trained in 81 patients and validated in 35 patients at Center 1 using 10-fold cross validation. The model was externally tested in 26 patients at Center 2. The predictive clinical factors, Rad-score, and Dos-score were identified to develop a nomogram model.

RESULTS

Using LASSO Cox regression, 13, 11, and 19 CT, PET-based radiomics, and dosiomics features, respectively, were selected. The clinical factors T-stage, N-stage, and clinical stage were selected as significant prognostic factors by univariate Cox regression. In the external validation cohort, the C-index of the combined model of CT-based radiomics, PET-based radiomics, and dosiomics features with clinical factors were 0.74, 0.82, and 0.92, respectively. Significant differences in overall survival (OS) in the combined model of CT-based radiomics, PET-based radiomics, and dosiomics features with clinical factors were observed between the high- and low-risk groups (P = 0.019, 0.038, and 0.014, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The dosiomics features have a better predicter for OS than CT- and PET-based radiomics features in ESCC treated with radiotherapy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The current study predicted the overall survival for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. The dosiomics features have a better predicter for overall survival than CT- and PET-based radiomics features.

Feasibility and flexibility of a novel multi-dose level avoidance reirradiation technical methodology in recurrent head and neck cancer

Reirradiation in recurrent head and neck cancer presents a considerable clinical challenge in radiation oncology. Though technically feasible due to advanced treatment delivery and planning techniques, confidence in delivering such treatments is not universal and patient selection is critical. Radiotherapy planning in reirradiation cases presents a complex technical challenge owing to the often-considerable overlap of dose from a patient's first treatment plan. This technical note describes three clinical case studies of recurrent head and neck cancer and the technical details of how their multidose level reirradiation was planned. Each patient had confirmed recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma and was referred for reirradiation to a previously irradiated area. The clinical details for each patient are provided before a detailed description of the treatment planning methodology is presented, which specifies how to approach such complex overlapping treatment volumes. The patient outcomes are described and a discussion is presented outlining the clinical challenges associated with these cases and the variables that must be accounted for when considering patients for potential reirradiation.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for treating primary head and neck cancer and locoregional recurrence: A comprehensive review of the literature

Introduction

Although stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has advance to standard-of-care for many different indications like lung and liver malignancies, it still remains in its infancy for treating head and neck cancer. Nevertheless there is a growing body of experience and evidence, which is summarized in this review Methods A thorough search of the literature was performed and critically reviewed both for SABR as a primary treatment as well as for treating locoregionally recurrent disease in a pre-irradiated field.

Results

There exist only few prospective data published so far for treating head and neck cancer with SABR. In the primary situation especially implementing SABR as a boost after definitive radiotherapy or a single-modality for locally limited, small glottic cancer appear promising. On the other hand, SABR can be a useful modality for treating local recurrence in a pre-irradiated field. However, caution is needed in the case of proximity to a pre-irradiated carotid artery or other serial organs at risk. Usually only limited gross volumes are treated with 3-6 fractions every other day and a cumulative dose of 24-44 Gy in dedicated radiosurgery platforms or modern linacs with the possibility of online image-guidance and adequate immobilsation.

Conclusions

SABR is an innovative, effective and promising treatment modality for small targets, especially in near proximity to organs at risk or in a pre-irradiated region. Prospective trials are further needed for this technique to become standard-of care.

A comparative dose-escalation analysis for reirradiated cancer patients with and without appropriate dose mapping

This study aims to compare dose escalation between two groups of reirradiated cancer patients, one with the previous contour and radiotherapy plan available on the treatment planning system and the other without. First group is identified as DICOM-group, while the other one is called non-DICOM group. The current study included 89 patients, 57 in the DICOM, and 32 in the non-DICOM group, who received reirradiation for recurrent or second primary tumours between 2019 and 2021. For the DICOM group, doses to 0.2cc volume for spine, brainstem, and optic apparatus from first radiation were converted into structures and transferred to reirradiation CT using deformable registration. First, one radiotherapy plan was created using the doctor prescribed dose (baseline prescription RxD_B); further an escalated dose (RxD_E) plan, taking into account all the dose volume parameters from previous radiation, was created only for DICOM group. In non-DICOM group patients were planned only for RxD_B. The maximum accepted dose escalation was 21 Gy. Radiotherapy prescription dose during earlier (first) treatment in DICOM and non-DICOM groups were 61 ± 5.6 Gy and 30-66 Gy, respectively. DICOM and non-DICOM groups had nearly identical baseline doses: 52.5 ± 10.7 Gy and 50.6 ± 6.9 Gy (difference 1.9 ± 12.7 Gy). Dose escalation was possible for 51 out of 57 patients in the DICOM-group. Average escalated dose in DICOM-group was 59.2 ± 6.2 Gy, with an incremental dose of 6.7 ± 12.4 Gy from the baseline prescription. No dose escalation was opted for in the non-DICOM group due to the unavailability of dose volume information from previous radiation. Reirradiation for head and neck cases allowed for a moderate to high dose escalation, facilitated by the presence of pertinent DICOM information from the initial radiotherapy.

Re-irradiation for isolated neck recurrence in head and neck tumor: impact of rN category

Unresectable, isolated lymph node recurrence after radiotherapy is rare but a candidate for re-irradiation. However, severe toxicity is anticipated. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the efficacy and toxicity of re-irradiation in isolated lymph node recurrence of head and neck lesions. We analyzed 46 patients who received re-irradiation for lymph node recurrence without local progression. The primary tumor sites included the oral cavity in 17 patients, the hypopharynx in 12, the oropharynx in seven, the larynx in three, the nasopharynx in two, and other sites. During a median follow-up time of 10 months, the median survival time was 10.6 months, and the 1-year overall survival rate was 45.5%. The 1-year local control and progression-free survival rates were 49.8% and 39.3%, respectively. According to univariate analysis, age (≥ 65 years), the interval between treatment (≥ 12 months), rN category (rN1), and gross tumor volume (GTV < 25 cm3) were predisposing factors for better survival. In the multivariate analysis, the rN category and interval were identified as statistically significant predictors. Late toxicity grade ≥ 3 occurred in four patients (8.6%). These were all Grade 5 carotid blowout syndrome, which associated with tumor invasion of the carotid artery and/ or high doses administration for the carotid artery. Small-volume rN1 tumor that recur after a longer interval is a feasible candidate for re-irradiation. However, strict patient selection and meticulous care for the carotid are required.

Reirradiation of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: a pragmatic approach-part I: prognostic factors and indications to treatment

INTRODUCTION

Reirradiation (reRT) of locally recurrent/second primary tumors of the head and neck region is a potentially curative treatment for patients not candidate to salvage surgery. Aim of the present study is to summarize available literature on both prognostic factors and indications to curative reRT in this clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A narrative review of the literature was performed on two topics: (1) patients' selection according to prognostic factors and (2) dosimetric feasibility of reRT. Postoperative reRT and palliative intent treatments were out of the scope of this work.

RESULTS

Patient-tumor and treatment-related prognostic factors were analyzed, together with dosimetric parameters concerning target volume and organs at risk. Based on available evidence, a stepwise approach has been proposed aiming to provide a useful tool to identify suitable candidates for curative reRT in clinical practice. This was then applied to two clinical cases, proposed at the end of this work.

CONCLUSION

A second course of RT in head and neck recurrence/second primary tumors is a personalized approach that can be offered to selected patients only in centers with expertise and dedicated equipment following a multidisciplinary team discussion.

[Therapy of tumor recurrences or secondary carcinomas in pretreated area is not compatible with the primary therapy in non-previously treated tissue - an overview]

There are different initial situations in the treatment of local or locoregional recurrences, secondary carcinomas or residual squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region after primary therapy. The majority of patients with locoregional recurrences have had prior treatment consisting of surgery and/or postoperative radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy or primary radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. In any case, it is a matter of new tumor growth in a previously treated area, which must be taken into account for the therapy decision. The biological backgrounds are diverse and are described in more detail and clinically classified in the present work.

Advancements of radiotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer in modern era

Head and neck cancer is a kind of cancer which can be eradicated from radical radiation therapy. However, with best efforts, nearly 40% patients will experience locoregional recurrence. Locoregional recurrence is the main cause of cancer-related death in head and neck cancers, so local treatments play a key role in improving progression free survival. In the last decades, radiation techniques have been tremendously developed, highly conformal radiation techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, brachytherapy and proton or heavy ion radiation therapy have their unique radiobiological advances. Although reirradiation is widely used in clinical practice, but little is known when comparing the different techniques. In this review, we will provide a comprehensive overview of the role of reirradiation in recurrent head and neck cancers including radiation techniques, patient selection, overall clinical benefits, and toxicities.

An Overview of Head and Neck Tumor Reirradiation: What Has Been Achieved So Far?

The recurrence rate of head and neck cancers (HNCs) after initial treatment may reach 70%, and poor prognosis is reported in most cases. Curative options for recurrent HNCs mainly depend on the treatment history and the recurrent tumor localization. Reirradiation for HNCs is effective and has been included in most guidelines. However, the option remains clinically challenging due to high incidence of severe toxicity, especially in cases of quick infield recurrence. Recent technical advances in radiation therapy (RT) provide the means for upgrade in reirradiation protocols. While the majority of hospitals stay focused on conventional and widely accessible modulated RTs, the particle therapy options emerge as tolerable and providing further treatment opportunities for recurrent HNCs. Still, the progress is impeded by high heterogeneity of the data and the lack of large-scale prospective studies. This review aimed to summarize the outcomes of reirradiation for HNCs in the clinical perspective.

Impact of hyperfractionated re-irradiation on quality of life in patients with recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer, a prospective single institutional study

Purpose

Describe the clinical outcome of hyperfractionated re-irradiation (HFRT) in patients with recurrent or second primary (SP) head and neck cancer (HNC).

Methods

This prospective observational study included HNC patients eligible for HFRT. Inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, recurrent or SP HNC, planned re-irradiation and ability to respond to questionnaires. Patients received 1.5 Gy twice daily, five days a week for three (palliative) or four (curative/local control) weeks, total dose 45/60 Gy. Toxicity was scored with CTCAE v3 at baseline, end of treatment, at three, six, 12 and 36 months follow-up. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was measured with EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35, pre-treatment and eight times until 36 months. In the main outcome (Global quality of life and H&N Pain), a change score of ≥10 was considered clinically significant, and p-values < 0.05 (two-sided) statistically significant. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses.

Results

Over four years from 2015, 58 patients were enrolled (37 recurrent and 21 SP). All, but two patients completed treatment as planned. Toxicity (≥grade 3) increased from pre-treatment to end of treatment with improvement in the follow-up period. The mean Global quality of life (QoL) and H&N Pain scores were stable from pre-treatment to three months. Maintained/ improved Global QoL was reported by 60% of patients at three months and 56% of patients at 12 months. For patients with curative, local control and palliative intent, the median survival (range) was 23 (2-53), 10 (1-66) and 14 (3-41) months respectively. Of those alive, the proportion of disease-free patients at 12 and 36 months, were 58% and 48%, respectively.

Conclusion

Most HNC patients reported maintained HRQoL at three and 12 months after HFRT despite serious toxicity observed in many patients. Long-term survival can be achieved in a limited proportion of the patients.

Dosimetric and clinical aspects of head and neck cancer reirradiation with intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques over the last decade

PURPOSE

Tumor recurrence in head and neck cancer (HNC) is very common, given that locoregional disease relapse occurs in up to 50% of patients. The clinical approach towards cancer recurrence is either by surgery and/or chemo-radiotherapy. Irrespective of the treatment, the management of HNC recurrence is highly challenging and often administered with palliative intent only. The aim of this work was to analyze clinical and dosimetric aspects, such as dose prescription, organ at risk sparing, overall survival and locoregional control of HNC after reirradiation with intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques based on studies published over the last decade, due to the wide clinical implementation of the intensity modulated radiotherapy and particularly of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for this malignancy.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted within Pub-med/Medline databases to find relevant studies. Of the 130 articles fulfilling the initial search criteria, 15 were selected for final analysis that encompassed all set requirements.

RESULTS

Clinical studies revealed the multitude of factors influencing treatment outcome, including anatomical location, histological tumor type, patient-related factors (smoking / comorbidities), cumulative dose and fractionation schedule, reirradiated volume and time between the irradiation of primary and recurrent tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the literature reports no specific data related to the type of intensity modulation used in reirradiation or any correlation with treatment outcome, IMRT and VMAT might offer comparable result after HNC reirradiation. Patient selection is potentially the main factor leading to an efficient outcome.

Reirradiation of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: a pragmatic approach, part II: radiation technique and fractionations

INTRODUCTION

Reirradiation (reRT) of local recurrent/second primary tumors of the head and neck represents a potential curative treatment for patients not candidate to a salvage surgery. Aim of the present study is to summarize literature data on modern radiation techniques and fractionations used in this setting of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A narrative review of the literature was conducted on three topics: (1) target volume delineation (2) reRT dose and techniques and (3) ongoing studies. Patients treated with postoperative reRT and palliative intent were not considered for the current analysis.

RESULTS

Recommendations on the target volume contouring have been reported. 3D-Conformal Radiotherapy, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, Stereotactic body Radiotherapy Intraoperative Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy and Charged Particles have been analyzed in terms of indication and fractionation in the field of reRT. Ongoing studies on the topic have been reported for IMRT and Charged Particles. Moreover, according to literature data a stepwise approach has been proposed aiming to provide a useful tool to select patients candidate to a curative reRT in daily clinical practice. Two clinical cases were also provided for its application.

CONCLUSION

Different radiation techniques and fractionations can be used for a second course of radiotherapy in patients with recurrent/second primary tumor of head and neck region. Tumor characteristics as well as radiobiological considerations should be take into account to define the best reRT approach.

Re-irradiation for head and neck cancer: outcome and toxicity analysis using a prospective single institution database

Purpose

Re-irradiation (re-RT) in head and neck cancer is challenging. This study prospectively explored the feasibility of re-RT in patients with loco-regionally recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer (LRR/SP HNC).

Methods

From 2004 to 2021, 61 LRR/SP HNC patients were treated with re-RT, defined as having a second course of RT with curative intent resulting in a cumulative dose of ≥100 Gy in an overlapping volume. Postoperative or definitive dynamic intensity-modulated and/or volumetric modulated re-RT was administered using twice daily hyperfractionation to 60 Gy combined with cisplatin or carboplatin/5-fluorouracil. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LRC) and distant metastasis control (DMC) were analyzed and prognostic factors evaluated. Toxicity was prospectively recorded and graded.

Results

The median follow-up was 9.8 months. In 41 patients (67.1%), complete administration of the intended treatment was not feasible. In 9 patients (15%) re-RT was interrupted prematurely and in other 9, the complete re-RT dose was lower than 60 Gy, and 37 patients (61%) could not receive or complete chemotherapy. Two-year OS, PFS and LRC rates were 19%, 18% and 30%, respectively. 20 patients (33%) received the complete intended treatment, and 1- and 2-year OS rates were 70% and 47%, respectively. Charlson comorbidity index was an important predictor for treatment completion. Multivariate analysis revealed recurrent N stage 0-1, age, chemotherapy administration and re-RT dose of 60 Gy as prognostic factors for clinical outcomes. No grade 5 re-RT-related toxicity was observed. The most common new grade ≥3 acute toxicities were dysphagia (52%) and mucositis (46%). Late toxicity included grade ≥3 dysphagia in 5% and osteoradionecrosis in 10% of evaluable patients, respectively. 6 patients (10%) were alive after 9 years without progression and no late toxicity grade ≥3, except for 2 patients presenting with osteoradionecrosis.

Conclusion

Hyperfractionated re-RT with 60 Gy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy was a curative treatment option with acceptable toxicity in LRR/SP patients. Patients with higher comorbidity had a higher probability of failing to receive and complete the intended therapy. Consequently, they derived unsatisfactory benefits from re-RT, highlighting the importance of patient selection.

Evaluation of quality of life in posttreatment upper aerodigestive tract cancer patients

Background

Cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract constitute approximately 4% of all malignancies. Posttreatment cancer patient faces serious adversities that affect the quality of life. Out of the various scales available to measure the quality of life, we chose the quality of life-oral cancer (QOL-OC), which was developed and evaluated by Nie et al. in 2018.

Aims and Objectives

The aim of our study was to assess the quality of life in posttreatment upper aerodigestive tract cancer patients in a tertiary care center and also to check the reliability and validity of the questionnaire QOL-OC.

Methodology

We communicated with 89 patients who were pathologically tested positive for upper aero digestive tract cancer from January 2019 to December 2019.

Results

The most prevalent adversity was found to be altered salivary flow, followed by diet and difficulty while eating. The QOL-OC was found to be a highly valid and reliable questionnaire.

Conclusion

The study points out regarding the prevalence of various adversities in post treatment cancer patients, a discussion has also been made suggesting the importance of multidisciplinary approach that should be provided in such patients. Finally, the study also concludes regarding the generalizability of the questionnaire QOL-OC.

Dose-escalated re-irradiation improves outcome in locally recurrent head and neck cancer - Results of a large multicenter analysis

To determine efficacy and prognostic parameters of definitive re-irradiation of locoregionally recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with locoregionally recurrent or second primary HNSCC undergoing re-irradiation with modern radiotherapy technique were eligible for this multicentric retrospective analysis. Main endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional control (LC). Univariate analyses were performed using the Kaplan Meier Method (log-rank). For multivariable analysis, Cox regression was used.

RESULTS

A total of 253 patients treated between 2009 and 2020 at 16 university hospitals in Germany were included. The median follow up was 27.4 months (range 0.5-130). The median OS and PFS were 13.2 (CI: 10.7 - 15.7) months and 7.9 (CI: 6.7 - 9.1) months, respectively, corresponding to two-year OS and PFS rates of 29 % and 19 %. Rates of locoregional progression and "in-field-failure" were 62 % and 51 % after two years. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified good ECOG performance status and high radiation dose as independent prognostic parameters for OS. Doses above 50 Gy (EQD2) achieved longer median OS of 17.8 months (vs 11.7 months, p < 0.01) and longer PFS of 9.6 months (vs 6.8 months, p < 0.01). In addition, there was a trend for worse survival in patients with tracheostomy (multivariable, p = 0.061). Concomitant systemic therapy did not significantly impact PFS or OS.

CONCLUSION

Re-irradiation of locally recurrent or second primary HNSCC is efficient, especially if doses above 50 Gy (EQD2) are delivered. ECOG performance score was the strongest prognostic parameter for OS and PFS.

Management of Recurrent HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Contemporary Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the impact of contemporary treatment strategies on salvage outcomes in patients with recurrent human papilloma virus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV + OPSCC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Secondary to HPV, changes in disease biology have impacted primary treatments and subsequent approaches to patients with recurrence. With treatment strategies more inclusive of upfront surgery, the characteristics of patients with recurrence HPV + OPSCC have been further redefined. Less invasive endoscopic surgical approaches such as transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and the continued refinement of conformal radiotherapy techniques, have improved treatment options for patients with recurrent HPV + OPSCC. Systemic treatment options have continued to expand including potentially effective immune-based therapies. Effective surveillance with systemic and oral biomarkers offers hope of earlier detection of recurrence. Management of patients with recurrent OPSCC remains difficult. Modest improvements in salvage treatment have been observed within the HPV + OPSCC cohort largely reflecting disease biology and improved treatment techniques.

Reirradiation for local recurrence of oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers: a multi-institutional study

This study aimed to examine the efficacy and toxicity of reirradiation in patients with locally recurrent oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers. We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional analysis of 129 patients with previously irradiated cancer. The most frequent primary sites were the nasopharynx (43.4%), oral cavity (24.8%), and oropharynx (18.6%). With a median follow-up duration of 10.6 months, the median overall survival was 14.4 months and the 2-year overall survival rate was 40.6%. For each primary site, the 2-year overall survival rates were 32.1%, 34.6%, 30%, 60.8%, and 5.7% for the hypopharynx, oral cavity, larynx, nasopharynx, and oropharynx, respectively. Prognostic factors for overall survival were primary site (nasopharynx versus other sites) and gross tumor volume (GTV) (≤ 25 cm³ versus > 25 cm³). The 2-year local control rate was 41.2%. Twenty-four patients (18.6%) presented with grade ≥ 3 toxicities, including nine with hemorrhages that led to grade 5 toxicities in seven patients. All nine tumors that caused hemorrhage showed tumor encasement of the carotid ≥ 180 degrees and eight of nine tumors had larger GTV > 25 cm³. Reirradiation is a feasible treatment option for small local recurrence of oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers, with the requirement of a strict eligibility assessment for large tumors with carotid encasement.

Current radiotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer in the modern era: a state-of-the-art review

BACKGROUND

In the management of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, local recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure. Only a few patients with recurrent HNC (rHNC) are eligible for salvage surgery and the majority of patients receive systemic therapy and radiotherapy. In recent years, with the development of irradiation technology, radiotherapy for rHNC patients has markedly attracted clinicians' attention and its therapeutic effects on patients with end-stage cancer are worthy of investigation as well.

METHODS

Several studies have investigated the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of rHNC patients. We reviewed retrospective reports and prospective trials published in recent decades that concentrated on the management of rHNC.

RESULTS

A growing body of evidence supported the application of irradiation to rHNC patients. According to the results of this review, current radiotherapy could achieve a better efficacy with a lower incidence of toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy is a promising treatment for rHNC patients.

Organ-at-risk sparing with dynamic trajectory radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: comparison with volumetric arc therapy on a publicly available library of cases

Background

Dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) extends volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with dynamic table and collimator rotation during beam-on. The aim of the study is to establish DTRT path-finding strategies, demonstrate deliverability and dosimetric accuracy and compare DTRT to state-of-the-art VMAT for common head and neck (HN) cancer cases.

Methods

A publicly available library of seven HN cases was created on an anthropomorphic phantom with all relevant organs-at-risk (OARs) delineated. DTRT plans were generated with beam incidences minimizing fractional target/OAR volume overlap and compared to VMAT. Deliverability and dosimetric validation was carried out on the phantom.

Results

DTRT and VMAT had similar target coverage. For three locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal carcinomas and one adenoid cystic carcinoma, mean dose to the contralateral salivary glands, pharynx and oral cavity was reduced by 2.5, 1.7 and 3.1 Gy respectively on average with DTRT compared to VMAT. For a locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma, D_0.03 cc to the ipsilateral optic nerve was above tolerance (54.0 Gy) for VMAT (54.8 Gy) but within tolerance for DTRT (53.3 Gy). For a laryngeal carcinoma, DTRT resulted in higher dose than VMAT to the pharynx and brachial plexus but lower dose to the upper oesophagus, thyroid gland and contralateral carotid artery. For a single vocal cord irradiation case, DTRT spared most OARs better than VMAT. All plans were delivered successfully on the phantom and dosimetric validation resulted in gamma passing rates of 93.9% and 95.8% (2%/2 mm criteria, 10% dose threshold).

Conclusions

This study provides a proof of principle of DTRT for common HN cases with plans that were deliverable on a C-arm linac with high accuracy. The comparison with VMAT indicates substantial OAR sparing could be achieved.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02092-5.

Retreatment of Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer After Prior Radiation: Executive Summary of the American Radium Society® (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC): Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology - Head and Neck Cancer

BACKGROUND

Re-treatment of recurrent or second primary head and neck cancers occurring in a previously irradiated field is complex. Few guidelines exist to support practice.

METHODS

We performed an updated literature search of peer-reviewed journals in a systematic fashion. Search terms, key questions, and associated clinical case variants were formed by panel consensus. The literature search informed the committee during a blinded vote on the appropriateness of treatment options via the modified Delphi method.

RESULTS

The final number of citations retained for review was 274. These informed five key questions, which focused on patient selection, adjuvant re-irradiation, definitive re-irradiation, stereotactic body radiation (SBRT), and re-irradiation to treat non-squamous cancer. Results of the consensus voting are presented along with discussion of the most current evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This provides updated evidence-based recommendations and guidelines for the re-treatment of recurrent or second primary cancer of the head and neck.

Clinical and technical challenges of cancer reirradiation: Words of wisdom

Since the development of new radiotherapy techniques that have improved healthy tissue sparing, reirradiation (reRT) has become possible. The selection of patients eligible for reRT is complex given that it can induce severe or even fatal side effects. The first step should therefore be to assess, in the context of multidisciplinary staff meeting, the patient's physical status, the presence of sequelae resulting from the first irradiation and the best treatment option available. ReRT can be performed either curatively or palliatively to treat a cancer-related symptom that is detrimental to the patient's quality of life. The selected techniques for reRT should provide the best protection of healthy tissue. The construction of target volumes and the evaluation of constraints regarding the doses that can be used in this context have not yet been fully codified. These points raised in the literature suggest that randomized studies should be undertaken to answer pending questions.

Salvage Surgery in Recurrent Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

More than half of patients with oral cancer recur even after multimodality treatment and recurrent oral cancers carry a poorer prognosis when compared to other sites of head and neck. The best survival outcome in a recurrent setting is achieved by salvage surgery; however, objective criteria to select an ideal candidate for salvage surgery is difficult to frame, as the outcome depends on various treatment-, tumor-, and patient-related factors. The following is summarizes various tumor- and treatment-related factors that guide our decision-making to optimize oncologic and functional outcomes in surgical salvage for recurrent oral cancers. Short disease-free interval, advanced tumor stage (recurrent and primary), extracapsular spread and positive tumor margins in a recurrent tumor, regional recurrence, and multimodality treatment of primary tumor all portend worse outcomes after surgical salvage. Quality of life after surgical intervention has shown improvement over 1 year with a drastic drop in pain scores. Various trials are underway evaluating the combination of immunotherapy and surgical salvage in recurrent head and neck tumors, including oral cavity, which may widen our indications for salvage surgery with improved survival and preserved organ function.

Locoregional Recurrence Prediction Using a Deep Neural Network of Radiological and Radiotherapy Images

Radiation therapy (RT) is an important and potentially curative modality for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Locoregional recurrence (LR) of HNSCC after RT is ranging from 15% to 50% depending on the primary site and stage. In addition, the 5-year survival rate of patients with LR is low. To classify high-risk patients who might develop LR, a deep learning model for predicting LR needs to be established. In this work, 157 patients with HNSCC who underwent RT were analyzed. Based on the National Cancer Institute’s multi-institutional TCIA data set containing FDG-PET/CT/dose, a 3D deep learning model was proposed to predict LR without time-consuming segmentation or feature extraction. Our model achieved an averaged area under the curve (AUC) of 0.856. Adding clinical factors into the model improved the AUC to an average of 0.892 with the highest AUC of up to 0.974. The 3D deep learning model could perform individualized risk quantification of LR in patients with HNSCC without time-consuming tumor segmentation.

Re-irradiation for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based re-irradiation (reRT) for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer (HNC).

Materials and Methods

Patients who underwent IMRT-based reRT for recurrent or second primary HNC between 2007 and 2019 at two institutions were included. Medical records and dosimetric data were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), severe late toxicities, and clinicopathological prognostic factors were analyzed.

Results

A total of 42 patients were analyzed. With a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range, 3.7 to 85.8 months), the median OS was 28.9 months with a 2-year OS rate of 54.6%. The median PFS and 2-year PFS rates were 10.0 months and 30.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that good performance (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0 or 1), a longer time interval (≥24 months) between radiotherapy courses, and higher reRT dose (>60 Gy) were significantly favorable factors for OS (all p < 0.05). Higher reRT dose and salvage surgery were significantly associated with improved PFS (all p < 0.05). Regarding the Multi‐Institution Reirradiation (MIRI) Collaborative RPA classification, the 2-year OS rates of each class were 87.5% in class I, 51.8% in class II, and 0% in class III (p = 0.008). Grade ≥3 late toxicity was reported in 10 (23.8%) patients. There was no significant factor associated with increased late toxicities.

Conclusion

IMRT-based reRT should be considered as a treatment option for patients with recurrent or second primary HNC. Further trials are needed to establish a subset of patients who may benefit from reRT without severe late toxicity.

Hyperfractionated radiotherapy for re-irradiation of recurrent esophageal cancer

Purpose

Re-irradiation is a treatment option for recurrent esophageal cancer patients with a history of radiotherapy, but there is a risk of severe late adverse effects. This study focused on the efficacy and safety of re-irradiation using hyperfractionated radiotherapy.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-six patients who underwent re-irradiation by the hyperfraction technique using twice-daily irradiation of 1.2 Gy per fraction for recurrent esophageal cancer were retrospectively included in this study. The overall survival period after the start of secondary radiotherapy and the occurrence of late adverse effects were investigated.

Results

Of 26 patients, 21 (81%) received re-irradiation with definitive intention and 21 (81%) underwent concurrent chemotherapy. The median re-irradiation dose was 60 Gy in 50 fractions in 25 treatment days, and the median accumulated irradiation dose in equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction was 85.4 Gy with an α/β value of 3. The median interval between two courses of radiotherapy was 21.0 months. The median overall survival period was 15.8 months and the 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates were 64.3% and 28.3%, respectively. Higher dose of re-irradiation and concurrent chemotherapy significantly improved survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.019, respectively). Severe late adverse effects with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or higher were observed in 5 (19.2%) patients, and 2 (7.7%) of them developed a grade 5 late adverse effect.

Conclusion

High-dose re-irradiation using a hyperfractionated schedule with concurrent chemotherapy might be related to good prognosis, while the rate of late severe adverse effects is not high compared with the rates in past reports.

Management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

This article reviews the various treatment options, by primary or postoperative external radiotherapy and by brachytherapy for the p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Dose levels, fractionation and association with systemic treatments are presented. The need for neck node dissection post local treatment is discussed, as well as specificities for the management of p16-positive tumours. Guidelines for target volume selection and delineation are thoroughly elaborated. Last, the management by radiotherapy of locoregional recurrences is discussed.

A Prospective Real-World Multi-Center Study to Evaluate Progression-Free and Overall Survival of Radiotherapy with Cetuximab and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy with Cetuximab in Locally Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer

Simple Summary

Despite recent developments in immune checkpoint inhibitors, the treatment of locoregionally recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) remains challenging. Prospective data comparing re-irradiation with systemic treatment are not available. The SOCCER trial represents a prospective non-interventional multicenter trial that enrolled patients with locoregionally recurrent HNSCC treated with cetuximab in combination with re-radiotherapy or chemotherapy. A total of 192 patients were analyzed. Radiotherapy combined with cetuximab had superior progression-free and overall survival compared to chemotherapy with cetuximab. This highlights the high efficacy of local re-radiotherapy in combination with cetuximab in patients with locoregionally recurrent HNSCC.

Abstract

Treatment options of locoregional recurrent head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) include both local strategies as surgery or re-radiotherapy and systemic therapy. In this prospective, multi-center, non-interventional study, patients were treated either with platinum-based chemotherapy and cetuximab (CT + Cet) or re-radiotherapy and cetuximab (RT + Cet). In the current analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in patients with locoregional recurrence. Four hundred seventy patients were registered in 97 German centers. After exclusion of patients with distant metastases, a cohort of 192 patients was analyzed (129 CT + Cet, 63 RT + Cet). Radiotherapy was delivered as re-irradiation to 70% of the patients. The mean radiation dose was 51.8 Gy, whereas a radiation dose of ≥60 Gy was delivered in 33% of the patients. Chemotherapy mainly consisted of cisplatin/5-flurouracil (40%) or carboplatin/5-flurouracil (29%). The median PFS was 9.2 months in the RT + Cet group versus 5.1 months in the CT + Cet group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.40, 95% CI, 0.27–0.57, p < 0.0001). Median OS was 12.8 months in the RT + Cet group versus 7.9 months in the CT + Cet group (hazard ratio for death, 0.50, 95% CI, 0.33–0.75, p = 0.0008). In conclusion, radiotherapy combined with cetuximab improved survival compared to chemotherapy combined with cetuximab in locally recurrent HNSCC.

Re-Irradiation for Head and Neck Cancer: Cumulative Dose to Organs at Risk and Late Side Effects

Simple Summary

Local recurrences of head and neck cancer are unfortunately common and can be difficult to treat. The treatment is challenging, partly due to the location, with several important organs in the head and neck area, but also because recurrence often occurs in an area already treated with radiotherapy. It has been shown that repeat radiotherapy, re-irradiation, can offer long-lasting tumor control and sometimes even cure in selected patients. However, there is a risk of normal tissue close to the tumor being damaged by high cumulative doses of radiotherapy. In this study, we aim to establish levels of cumulative dose to specific organs that could be considered reasonably safe to deliver at re-irradiation without causing high rates of severe side effects. Increased knowledge in dose–response relationships in re-irradiation for head and neck cancer will facilitate a tailored treatment for the individual patient.

Abstract

Re-irradiation in head and neck cancer is challenging, and cumulative dose constraints and dose/volume data are scarce. In this study, we present dose/volume data for patients re-irradiated for head and neck cancer and explore the correlations of cumulative dose to organs at risk and severe side effects. We analyzed 54 patients re-irradiated for head and neck cancer between 2011 and 2017. Organs at risk were delineated and dose/volume data were collected from cumulative treatment plans of all included patients. Receiver–operator characteristics (ROC) analysis assessed the association between dose/volume parameters and the risk of toxicity. The ROC-curve for a logistic model of carotid blowout vs. maximum doses to the carotid arteries showed AUC = 0.92 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.00) and a cut-off value of 119 Gy (sensitivity 1.00/specificity 0.89). The near-maximum dose to bones showed an association with the risk of osteoradionecrosis: AUC = 0.74 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.95) and a cut-off value of 119 Gy (sensitivity 1.00/specificity 0.52). Our analysis showed an association between cumulative dose to organs at risk and the risk of developing osteoradionecrosis and carotid blowout, and our results support the existing dose constraint for the carotid arteries of 120 Gy. The confirmation of these dose–response relationships will contribute to further improvements of re-irradiation strategies.

IRAK2, an IL1R/TLR Immune Mediator, Enhances Radiosensitivity via Modulating Caspase 8/3-Mediated Apoptosis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Predicting and overcoming radioresistance are crucial in radiation oncology, including in managing oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). First, we used RNA-sequence to compare expression profiles of parent OML1 and radioresistant OML1-R OSCC cells in order to select candidate genes responsible for radiation sensitivity. We identified IRAK2, a key immune mediator of the IL-1R/TLR signaling, as a potential target in investigating radiosensitivity. In four OSCC cell lines, we observed that intrinsically low IRAK2 expression demonstrated a radioresistant phenotype (i.e., OML1-R and SCC4), and vice versa (i.e., OML1 and SCC25). Next, we overexpressed IRAK2 in low IRAK2-expression OSCC cells and knocked it down in high IRAK2-expression cells to examine changes of irradiation response. After ionizing radiation (IR) exposure, IRAK2 overexpression enhanced the radiosensitivity of radioresistant cells and synergistically suppressed OSCC cell growth both in vitro and in vivo, and vice versa. We found that IRAK2 overexpression restored and enhanced radiosensitivity by enhancing IR-induced cell killing via caspase-8/3-dependent apoptosis. OSCC patients with high IRAK2 expression had better post-irradiation local control than those with low expression (i.e., 87.4% vs. 60.0% at five years, P = 0.055), showing that IRAK2 expression was associated with post-radiation recurrence. Multivariate analysis confirmed high IRAK2 expression as an independent predictor for local control (HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.016 – 0.760; P = 0.025). In conclusion, IRAK2 enhances radiosensitivity, via modulating caspase 8/3-medicated apoptosis, potentially playing double roles as a predictive biomarker and a novel therapeutic target in OSCC.

The influence of facility volume on patient treatments and survival outcomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the influence of facility case-volume on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatments and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with NPC receiving definitive treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 8260 patients (5-year OS: 63.4%) were included. The 1114 unique facilities were categorized into 854 low-volume (treating 1-8 patients), 200 intermediate-volume (treating 9-23 patients), and 60 high-volume (treating 24-187 patients) facilities. Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis demonstrated significantly improved OS with high-volume facilities (p < 0.001). On cox proportional-hazard multivariate regression after adjusting for age, sex, income, insurance, comorbidity index, histology, AJCC clinical stage, and treatment type, high-volume facilities were associated with lower mortality risk than low-volume (HR = 0.865, p = 0.019) and intermediate-volume facilities (HR = 0.916, p = 0.004). Propensity score matching analysis confirmed this association (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Higher facility volume was an independent predictor of improved OS in NPC, suggesting a possible survival benefit of referrals to high-volume medical centers.

Recurrent/Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Big and Intriguing Challenge Which May Be Resolved by Integrated Treatments Combining Locoregional and Systemic Therapies

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is a complex group of malignancies, posing several challenges to treating physicians. Most patients are diagnosed with a locally advanced disease and treated with strategies integrating surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. About 50% of these patients will experience a recurrence of disease. Recurrent/metastatic SCCHN have poor prognosis with a median survival of about 12 months despite treatments. In the last years, the strategy to manage recurrent/metastatic SCCHN has profoundly evolved. Salvage treatments (surgery or re-irradiation) are commonly employed in patients suffering from locoregional recurrences and their role has gained more and more importance in the last years. Re-irradiation, using some particularly fractionating schedules, has the dual task of reducing the tumor mass and eliciting an immune response against cancer (abscopal effect). In this review, we will analyze the main systemic and/or locoregional strategies aimed at facing the recurrent/metastatic disease, underlining the enormous importance of the multidisciplinary approach in these types of patients.

Re-irradiation with concurrent and maintenance nivolumab in locally recurrent and inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A single-center cohort study

•

Combination of in-field ReRT and nivolumab for locally recurrent HNSCC is feasible.

•

No unexpected radiation-related toxicity occurred.

•

CRP-, hemoglobin-levels, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio were associated with LPFS.

Background

The rate of loco-regional recurrences for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) following standard treatment reaches up to 50%, accompanied by a probability of 20% to develop a second primary tumor in the head and neck region.

Methods

Ten patients with inoperable, in-field recurrence of HNSCC following previous primary or adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in combination with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy were re-irradiated with 60 Gray in 30 fractions between December 2017 and January 2020 with concurrent and maintenance nivolumab administration. Data were retrospectively collected and compared with patients who underwent re-irradiation (ReRT) with concurrent cisplatin following propensity score matching (PSM). Local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS) were visualized using Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test).

Results

All patients completed ReRT. Median number of applied courses of nivolumab was 12 (range, 3–38). OS rate was 50% at 12 months and the median OS was 11 (range, 2–23) months. Six and 12 month LPFS rates were 60% and 30%, respectively. Median LPFS was 8 (range, 2–19) months. OS and LPFS rates were not inferior to those of patients treated with concurrent cisplatin. No unexpected radiation-related toxicity occurred. A total of four patients developed any-grade immune-related adverse events of which two presented with grade 3 toxicities. One patient died within 3 weeks after ReRT. Higher blood levels of CRP (p = 0.004), lower levels of hemoglobin (p = 0.029) and higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.004) were associated with impaired LPFS. Higher recursive portioning analysis (RPA) class was associated with impaired LPFS (p = 0.022) and OS (p = 0.024).

Conclusion

The combination of ReRT and nivolumab for locally recurrent HNSCC was feasible without occurrence of unexpected toxicities. Combined radioimmunotherapy might offer an effective treatment option for carefully selected pre-irradiated patients ineligible for salvage surgery.

Permanent Interstitial Cesium-131 Brachytherapy in Treating High-Risk Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study

Purpose/Objectives

To establish the feasibility and safety of intraoperative placement of cesium-131 (Cs-131) seeds for re-irradiation in recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC).

Methods

Patients with resectable recurrent HNC who were deemed to have a high risk of second recurrence were eligible. Immediately after tumor extirpation, seeds were implanted in the surgical bed based on the preoperative treatment plan with intraoperative adjustment. The surgical bed and the seeds were covered with a regional flap or microvascular free flap. A CT of the neck was obtained on postoperative day 1 for evaluation of the postoperative dose distribution. Patients were followed 1 and 3 months after surgery, then every 3 months in the first 2 years.

Results

From November 2016 to September 2018, 15 patients were recruited and 12 patients received treatment per protocol. For the patients who had implants, the sites of initial recurrence included 10 neck alone, 1 neck and larynx, and 1 neck/peristomal. The median follow-up was 21.4 months. After surgery, patients remained hospitalized for a median of 6 days. There were no high-grade toxicities except two patients with wound complications requiring wound care. Eight patients had recurrences, three locoregional alone, three distant alone, and two with both locoregional and distant recurrences. Only one patient had an in-field failure. Five patients died, with 1- and 2-year overall survival of 75 and 58%.

Conclusions

Cs-131 implant after surgical resection in recurrent HNC is feasible and safe. There were no unexpected severe toxicities. Most failures were out-of-field or distant.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02794675.

Cost-utility analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy plus cetuximab in previously irradiated recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to estimate the cost-utility of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plus cetuximab for patients with previously irradiated recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS

We constructed a Markov health-state transition model to simulate costs and clinical outcomes of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Model parameters were derived from the published literature and the National Health Insurance Administration reimbursement price list. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and the net monetary benefit were calculated from a health payer perspective. The impact of uncertainty was modeled with one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

In the base-case, SBRT plus cetuximab compared to SBRT alone resulted in an ICER of NT$ 840,455 per QALY gained. In the one-way sensitivity analysis, the utility of progression-free state for patients treated with SBRT plus cetuximab or SBRT alone and the cost of progression-free survival for SBRT+Cet were the most sensitive parameters in the model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of NT$ 2,252,340 per QALY was 100% for SBRT plus cetuximab but 0% for SBRT alone.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that SBRT+Cet was cost-effective and benefited patients with previously irradiated rSCCHN.

A surveillance study of patterns of reirradiation practice using external beam radiotherapy in Japan

The aim of this study was to survey the present status and patterns of reirradiation (Re-RT) practice using external beam radiotherapy in Japan. We distributed an e-mail questionnaire to the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology partner institutions, which consisted of part 1 (number of Re-RT cases in 2008-2012 and 2013-2018) and part 2 (indications and treatment planning for Re-RT and eight case scenarios). Of the 85 institutions that replied to part 1, 75 (88%) performed Re-RTs. However, 59 of these 75 institutions (79%) reported difficulty in obtaining Re-RT case information from their databases. The responses from 37 institutions included the number of Re-RT cases, which totaled 508 in the period from 2009 to 2013 (institution median 3; 0-235), and an increase to 762 cases in the period from 2014 to 2018 (12.5; 0-295). A total of 47 physicians responded to part 2 of the survey. Important indications for Re-RT that were considered were age, performance status, life expectancy, absence of distant metastases and time interval since previous radiotherapy. In addition to clinical decision-making factors, previous total radiation dose, volume of irradiated tissue and the biologically equivalent dose were considered during Re-RT planning. From the eight site-specific scenarios presented to the respondents, >60% of radiation oncologists agreed to perform Re-RT. Re-RT cases have increased in number, and interest in Re-RT among radiation oncologists has increased recently due to advances in technology. However, several problems exist that emphasize the need for consensus building and the establishment of guidelines for practice and prospective evaluation.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Treatment Management and Survival Outcomes in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To comprehensively investigate nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment, overall survival (OS), and the influence of clinical/sociodemographic factors on outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database study.

SETTING

National Cancer Database.

METHODS

The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database was queried for all patients with NPC receiving definitive treatment. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 8260 patients with NPC were included (71.4% male; 42.5% with keratinizing histology; mean ± SD age, 52.1 ± 15.1 years), with a 5-year OS of 63.4%. Multivariate predictors of mortality included age ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81; P < .001), Charlson/Deyo score ≥1 (HR, 1.27; P = .001), American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage III to IV (HR, 1.85; P < .001), and government insurance or no insurance (HR, 1.53; P < .001). Predictors of survival included female sex (HR, 0.82; P = .002), Asian/Pacific Islander race (HR, 0.74; P < .001), nonkeratinizing/undifferentiated histology (HR, 0.79; P = .004), and receiving treatment at academic centers (HR, 0.87; P = .02). Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) demonstrated improved OS as compared with radiotherapy (RT) only for stage II (P = .006) and stage III (P = .005) and with RT or chemotherapy only in stage IVA NPC (P < .001). When compared with CRT alone, surgery plus CRT provided OS benefits in keratinizing (P = .013) or stage IVA (P = .030) NPC. When compared with RT, CRT provided OS benefits in keratinizing (P = .005) but not nonkeratinizing (P = .240) or undifferentiated (P = .390) NPC. Substandard radiation dosing of <60 Gy and <30 fractions were associated with inferior OS (both P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

NPC survival is dependent on a variety of clinical/sociodemographic factors. Stage-specific treatments with optimal OS include CRT or RT for stages I to II and CRT for stage III to IV. The large representation of nonendemic histology is valuable, as these cases are not well characterized.

Intelligent IoT-based large-scale inverse planning system considering postmodulation factors

The model and algorithm of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) are updated increasingly quickly, but the hardware upgrade of primary hospitals often lags behind. The new generation of intelligent precise radiotherapy platforms provides users with intelligent medical consortium services using big data, artificial intelligence and industrial Internet of Things technology. This technology can ensure that under the real-time guidance of a professional medical consortium, primary hospitals can realize rapid large-scale reverse planning design and can more accurately consider many factors of postprocessing. Although large-scale healthcare systems, such as volumetric-modulated arc therapy and other accurate radiotherapy technologies, have developed rapidly, the development of step-and-shoot-mode IMRT technology is still very important for developing countries. For software, in addition to the conformity of the dose distribution, the modulation speed, convenience and stability of the later dose delivery should also be considered in inverse planning. Therefore, this paper analyzes the main problems in conventional IMRT inverse planning, including the smoothing of the fluence map, the selection of the gantry angle and the dose leakage of tongue–groove effects. To address these issues, a novel Intelligent IoT-based large-scale inverse planning strategy with the key factors of the postmodulation is developed, and a detailed flow chart is also provided. The scheme consists of two steps. The first step is to obtain a relatively optimal combination of gantry angles by considering the dose distribution requirements and constraints and the modulation requirements and constraints. The second step is to optimize the intensity map, to smooth the map based on prior knowledge according to the determined angles, and to obtain the final modulation scheme according to the relevant objectives and constraints of the map decomposition (leaf sequencing). In an experiment, we calculate and validate the clinical head and neck case. Because of the special gantry angle selection, the angle combination is optimized from the initial equivalent distribution to adapt to the target area and protect the nontarget area. The value of the objective function varies greatly after the optimization, especially in the target area, and the target value decreases by approximately 10%. On this basis, we smooth the fluence map by a partial differential equation with prior knowledge and a minimization of the total number of monitor units. It is also shown from the objective function value that the target value is essentially unchanged for the target area, while for the nontarget area, the value decreases by 16%, which is very impressive.

Radical external beam re-irradiation in the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancer: Critical review

Management of patients with recurrent head and neck cancer remains a challenge for the surgeon as well as the treating radiation oncologist. Even in the era of modern radiotherapy, the rate of severe toxicity remains high with unsatisfactory treatment results. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and heavy-ion irradiation have all emerged as highly conformal and precise techniques that offer many radiobiological advantages in various clinical situations. Although re-irradiation is now widespread in clinical practice, little is known about the differences in treatment response and toxicity using diverse re-irradiation techniques. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the role of radiation therapy in recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer including patient selection, therapeutic outcome, and risk using different re-irradiation techniques. Critical review of published evidence on IMRT, SBRT, and heavy-ion full-dose re-irradiation is presented including data on locoregional control, overall survival, and toxicity.

Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Simple Summary

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma is an aggressive cancer subtype with a dismal prognosis. Multimodal treatment approaches consisting of surgical resection, radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy have resulted in longer overall survival and promising outcomes. Hypofractionated RT is an alternative to conventional RT regimens. In this study, we aim to evaluate the outcome of hypofractionated regimens, perform a systematic review concerning hypofractionated RT and pooled analysis of this treatment modality. Hypofractionated RT appears to be non-inferior compared to conventional RT concerning OS after propensity score matching. In addition, radiation dose escalation correlated with a longer OS. In conclusion, hypofractionated RT is effective with manageable toxicity and could be an integral part in multimodal treatment.

Abstract

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is associated with a poor prognosis due to aggressive tumor growth and high treatment resistance. Hypofractionated treatment concepts may be more effective and less time consuming compared to normofractionated radiotherapy (RT). In this retrospective study, we aim to evaluate the outcome of hypofractionated regimens and perform a systematic review concerning hypofractionated RT and pooled analysis of this treatment modality. A systematic review using the MEDLINE/Pubmed and Cochrane databases was performed. Data from all eligible studies were extracted, and a pooled analysis of literature and our cohort (n = 60) was carried out to examine patient characteristics, toxicity, and outcomes of patients with ATC. As a result, median overall survival (OS) of the single center cohort was four (range 1–12) months. Survival rates at one, three, and six months were 82%, 55%, and 36%, respectively. In univariate analyses, multimodal treatment (p = 0.006) and gender (p = 0.04) were correlated with an improved OS. Six studies with a total number of 152 patients undergoing hypofractionated RT treatment were analyzed. The pooled analysis included four patient cohorts with 60 patients and showed median OS of 5.3 (range: 1–24) months. Multimodal treatment (p < 0.001) and a cumulative radiation dose ≥50 Gy in equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) (p = 0.014) correlated with an improved OS. On multivariate analysis, multimodal treatment (p = 0.003, hazard ratio (HR): 0.636, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.469–0.861) was an independent predictor for longer OS. After propensity score matching (PSM), hypofractionated RT appears to be non-inferior compared to normofractionated RT concerning OS. In conclusion, hypofractionated RT is effective with manageable toxicity. A dose escalation with ≥50 Gy (EQD2) correlated with a longer OS. Hypofractionated RT could be an integral part in multimodal treatment with a promising outcome.

The 3 Bs of cancer care amid the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: "Be safe, be smart, be kind"-A multidisciplinary approach increasing the use of radiation and embracing telemedicine for head and neck cancer

Because of the national emergency triggered by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, government-mandated public health directives have drastically changed not only social norms but also the practice of oncologic medicine. Timely head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment must be prioritized, even during emergencies. Because severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 predominantly resides in the sinonasal/oral/oropharyngeal tracts, nonessential mucosal procedures are restricted, and HNCs are being triaged toward nonsurgical treatments when cures are comparable. Consequently, radiation utilization will likely increase during this pandemic. Even in radiation oncology, standard in-person and endoscopic evaluations are being restrained to limit exposure risks and preserve personal protective equipment for other frontline workers. The authors have implemented telemedicine and multidisciplinary conferences to continue to offer standard-of-care HNC treatments during this uniquely challenging time. Because of the lack of feasibility data on telemedicine for HNC, they report their early experience at a high-volume cancer center at the domestic epicenter of the COVID-19 crisis.

Overlapping volumes in re-irradiation for head and neck cancer - an important factor for patient selection

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consensus concerning the definition of re-irradiation and re-irradiation volumes in head and neck cancer (HNC). The aim of the present study is to introduce a more strict definition of the re-irradiated volume that might better predict the risk of serious side-effects from treatment.

METHODS

Fifty-four consecutive patients re-irradiated for HNC cancer were retrospectively analysed. CT images were deformably registered and the dose distributions accumulated after conversion to EQD2. Patients with a cumulative dose of ≥100 Gy in the overlapping volume (V100) were included in the study. Survival data and radiation-related acute and late toxicities were recorded.

RESULTS

The overall survival of all included patients at 2 and 5 years was 42.6 and 27.3% respectively and the progression free survival at 2 and 5 years was 32.5 and 28.5% respectively. The overall rate of any event of severe (grade ≥ 3) acute and late toxicity was 26 and 51%, respectively. We found that severe acute toxicity was more common in patients who had a larger overlapping volume (V100 > mean) where 43% of the patients experienced grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity, compared to the patients with smaller overlapping volumes (V100 < mean) where only 11% had severe toxicity (p = 0.02). The seemingly high rates of late toxicity in the present study could be due to the use of a more strict definition of re-irradiation. In previous studies also patients with low dose overlap are included and our results imply that there is a risk that previous studies might have overestimated the risk-benefit ratio in re-irradiation of HNC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study describes the outcome of a patient material where a more strict definition of the re-irradiated volume is used. With this definition, which could better describe the volume of highest risk for serious complications, we found that larger such overlapping volumes result in an increase in severe acute side-effects. A clear definition of re-irradiation and re-irradiation volumes is of utmost importance for future studies of HNC to make results from different studies comparable.

Long-term outcomes and safety after reirradiation in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic area

PURPOSE

To determine outcomes and toxicities after reirradiation for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) and to apply a prognostic index in a non-endemic region.

METHODS

We retrospectively reported progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related toxicities in patients treated with curative intent for locally rNPC. We applied the prognostic model for OS and grade 5 radiotherapy (RT)-related toxicities published by Li et al. and evaluated its prognostic accuracy by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2018, 33 patients were treated for rNPC in our institution. Median follow-up was 60 months. The mean time to local recurrence was 75 months. Six (18%) patients had a persistent grade 3 toxicity from a previous RT course. The median re-RT dose was 66 Gy. After re-RT, 13 patients had local failure and 3 patients had metastatic recurrence. Median PFS was 18 months with a 5-year PFS rate of 29%. Median OS was 35 months with a 5-year OS rate of 37%. Grade 3 or higher toxicities rate was 74%. There were 21% grade 5 toxicities. The median time to a grade 5 toxicity was less than 6 months following re-RT. The prognostic nomogram was not predictive for OS or grade 5 toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Reirradiation of rNPC is an effective treatment but is associated with a high rate of life-threatening toxicity. Stratification of patients based on their risk of developing severe toxicity is needed to select patients who will most likely benefit from re-RT.

Is It Worth It? Consequences of Definitive Head and Neck Reirradiation

Locally recurrent head and neck malignancies after definitive radiation or chemoradiation represent challenging clinical scenarios requiring careful consideration of individualized risks and benefits before deciding upon the next best course of therapy. Herein, a case-based approach to personalized decision making highlights the expert opinions of leaders in head and neck oncology. Topics of interest include optimal candidacy for reirradiation or salvage surgical resection, the judicious use of chemotherapy as induction therapy or as a radiosensitizing agent, the incorporation of immunotherapy into the treatment paradigm for locally recurrent disease, and the impact of various treatment modalities on quality of life and functional outcomes. Interestingly, the lack of consensus among the experts on topics as fundamental as the appropriateness of offering reirradiation at all and as nuanced as target volume delineation for the reirradiated field suggests that there is no straightforward approach in this scenario. Common to all opinions is a desire to maximize the therapeutic ratio for a patient potentially facing a grim prognosis, and honest discussions about goals of care and expectations for post-treatment quality of life should be central to the clinical approach to this and similar cases.

Follow-Up of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors: Tipping the Balance of Intensity

The traditional concept of post-treatment surveillance in head and neck cancer patients relies on examinations directed at early detection of disease recurrence and/or second primary tumors. They are usually provided by ear, nose and throat specialists with complementary input from radiation oncologists and medical oncologists. Emerging evidence underscores the importance of monitoring and effective management of late adverse events. One of the major drawbacks is a lack of prospective controlled data. As a result, local institutional policies differ, and practice recommendations are subject to continuing debate. Due to the economic burden and impact on emotional comfort of patients, intensity and content of follow-up visits are a particularly conflicting topic. According to the current evidence-based medicine, follow-up of head and neck cancer patients does not prolong survival but can improve quality of life. Therefore, an approach giving priority to a multidisciplinary care involving a speech and swallowing expert, dietician, dentist, and psychologist may indeed be more relevant. Moreover, on a case-by-case basis, some patients need more frequent consultations supplemented by imaging modalities. Human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal cancer tends to develop late failures at distant sites, and asymptomatic oligometastatic disease, especially in the lungs, can be successfully salvaged by local ablation, either surgically or by radiation. The deep structures of the skull base related to the nasopharynx are inaccessible to routine clinical examination, advocating periodic imaging supplemented by nasofibroscopy as indicated. Anamnesis of heavy smoking justifies annual low-dose computed tomography screening of the thorax and intensive smoking cessation counseling. Finally, some cancer survivors feel more comfortable with regular imaging, and their voice should be taken into consideration. Future development of surveillance strategies will depend on several variables including identification of reliable predictive factors to select those who could derive the most benefit from follow-up visits, the availability of long-term follow-up data, the results of the first randomized trials, resource allocation patterns, infrastructure density, and the therapeutic landscape of locally advanced and recurrent and/or metastatic disease, which is rapidly changing with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors and better utilization of local approaches.

The value of moderate dose escalation for re-irradiation of recurrent or second primary head-and-neck cancer

Background

Treatment for local and locoregional recurrence or second head-and-neck (H&N) cancers after previous radiotherapy is challenging, and re-irradiation carries a significantly increased risk for radiotherapy-related normal tissue toxicities and treatment failure due to a radioresistant tumor phenotype. Here, we analyzed re-irradiation management and outcomes in patients with recurrent or second primary H&N carcinoma using state-of-the-art diagnostic procedures and radiotherapy techniques.

Methods

Between 2010 and 2019, 48 patients with recurrent or second primary H&N carcinoma received re-radiotherapy at the University of Freiburg Medical Center and were included in this study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate Cox-regression analyses were performed to assess the effects of clinico-pathological factors on treatment outcomes. Acute and chronic treatment-related toxicities were quantified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.03).

Results

Thirty-one patients (64.6%) received definitive and 17 (35.4%) adjuvant radiotherapy. Simultaneous chemotherapy was administered in 28 patients (58.3%) with cetuximab as the most commonly used systemic agent (n = 17, 60.7%). After a median time of 17 months (range 4 months to 176 months) between first and second radiotherapy, patients were re-irradiated with a median of 58.4 Gy and a treatment completion rate of 87.5% (n = 42). Median OS was 25 months with a 1-year OS amounting to 62.4%, and median PFS was 9 months with a 1-year PFS of 37.6%. Univariate analyses demonstrated that both a lower rT-status and a radiotherapy boost were associated with improved OS (p < 0.05). There was a trend towards superior OS for patients who received > 50 Gy (p = 0.091) and who completed the prescribed radiotherapy (p = 0.055). Five patients (10.4%) suffered from at least one grade 3 toxicities, while 9 patients (27.3%) experienced chronic higher-grade toxicities (≥ grade 3) with one (3.0%) grade 4 carotid blowout and one (3.0%) grade 4 osteoradionecrosis.

Conclusion

Re-irradiation of recurrent or second primary H&N cancer with modern radiation techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy resulted in promising survival rates with acceptable toxicities compared to historical cohorts. Increased re-irradiation doses, utilization of a radiotherapy boost and completion of the re-irradiation treatment were found to result in improved survival.

Dosiomics improves prediction of locoregional recurrence for intensity modulated radiotherapy treated head and neck cancer cases

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether dosiomics can benefit to IMRT treated patient's locoregional recurrences (LR) prediction through a comparative study on prediction performance inspection between radiomics methods and that integrating dosiomics in head and neck cancer cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 237 patients with head and neck cancer from four different institutions was obtained from The Cancer Imaging Archive and utilized to train and validate the radiomics-only prognostic model and integrate the dosiomics prognostic model. For radiomics, the radiomics features were initially extracted from images, including CTs and PETs, and selected on the basis of their concordance index (CI) values, then condensed via principle component analysis. Lastly, multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed with class-imbalance adjustment as the LR prediction models by inputting those condensed features. For dosiomics integration model establishment, the initial features were similar, but with additional 3-dimensional dose distribution from radiation treatment plans. The CI and the Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank analysis were used to assess and compare these models.

RESULTS

Observed from the independent validation dataset, the CI of the model for dosiomics integration (0.66) was significantly different from that for radiomics (0.59) (Wilcoxon test, p=5.9×10^-31). The integrated model successfully classified the patients into high- and low-risk groups (log-rank test, p=2.5×10^-02), whereas the radiomics model was not able to provide such classification (log-rank test, p=0.37).

CONCLUSION

Dosiomics can benefit in predicting the LR in IMRT-treated patients and should not be neglected for related investigations.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for recurrent and previously irradiated head and neck cancers

Objective:

To assess the response and toxicity of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC), who had previously received radiation for their primary tumor.

Methods:

Between 2014 and 2018, patients who received SABR to recurrent HNC within the previously irradiated region were retrospectively reviewed. Mean age was 60 years (range 30–78 Years). Histology was confirmed in all patients. MRI and /or CT-positron emission tomography were done to evaluate local extent and to rule out metastasis. Response was assessed as per RECIST/PERCIST Criteria. Cox proportional hazards regression and the Kaplan–Meier methods were used for statistical analysis.

Results:

32 patients received SABR. RPA Class II, III patients were 20 and 12 respectively. 87% patients received a dose of ≥30 Gy/5 fractions. Median follow-up was 12 months. Estimated 1 year and 2 years local control was 64.2 and 32% and 1 year and 2 years overall survival was 67.5 and 39.5% respectively. Acute Grade 2 skin and Grade 3 mucosal toxicity was seen in 31.3 and 28% patients respectively. Late Grade 3 toxicity was seen in 9.3% patients.

Conclusion:

Re-irradiation with SABR yields high local control rates and is well tolerated. It compares favorably with other treatment modalities offered to patients with recurrent HNC. It is also suitable for patients of RPA Class II and III. There is need for novel systemic agents to further improve the survival.

Advances in knowledge:

Treatment of patients with recurrent HNC is challenging and is more difficult in previously radiated patient. More than 50% patients are unresectable. Other options of salvage treatment like re-irradiation and chemotherapy are associated with poor response rates and high incidence of acute and late toxicity (Gr ≥3 toxicity 50–70%). SABR is a novel technology to deliver high dose of radiation to recurrent tumor with high precision. It yields high local control rates with less toxicity compared to conventionally fractionated radiation.