Single incision laparoscopic approach for esophageal achalasia: A case report

Single incision laparoscopic fundoplication: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Fundoplication, was first introduced as a surgical treatment method of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Consequently, several modifications of this method have been described, whereas laparoscopic fundoplication was recently introduced. Although single incision (SI) fundoplication was considered as an alternative to the conventional laparoscopic approach, several studies reported an increased operation duration, and high rates of multiport conversion and incisional hernia.

AIM

To provide a current overview of the technical variations and the postoperative outcomes of patients submitted to SI fundoplication.

METHODS

The present systematic review of the literature was designed and conducted on the basis of the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic screening of the electronic scholar databases (Medline, Scopus and Web of Science) was performed.

RESULTS

Literature search resulted in the identification of 19 studies. Overall, 266, 137 and 110 SI Nissen, Dor and Toupet fundoplications were reported, respectively. In the majority of the trials, standard laparoscopic instruments were used. The left liver lobe was displayed through the use of forceps, graspers, retractors, drains or even glue. Both intra-corporeal and extracorporeal suturing was described. Mean operative time was 136.3 min. Overall complication rate was 5.2% and the rate of incisional hernia was 0.9%. No mortality was reported.

CONCLUSION

Due to the methodological heterogeneity and the lack of high quality studies comparing multi to single access techniques and the several variations, we conclude that further well designed studies are necessary, in order to evaluate the role of SI fundoplication.

Secondary headache due to aspergillus sellar abscess simulating a pituitary neoplasm: case report and review of literature

Fungal sellar abscess is rare. A 42-year-old man was admitted with 2-month headache characterized by right peri-orbital pain. An intrasellar mass was found to be simulated a pituitary neoplasm after magnetic resonance imaging examination, and operated on via an endoscopic trans-sphenoidal approach. Milk-like pus and a mass of ash black mixed and necrotic material were found and removed. Histopathology revealed numerous aspergillus hyphae. Itraconazole was given on a dosage of 200 mg twice a day orally for 6 weeks. No recurrence was observed during follow-up. Complete surgical resection through endoscopic trans-sphenoidal approach combined with systemic anti-fungal therapy, should be considered as the optimal treatment.

Short-term surgical outcomes of reduced port surgery for esophageal achalasia

PURPOSE

To clarify the feasibility and utility of reduced port surgery (RPS) for achalasia.

METHODS

Between September 2005 and June 2013, 359 patients with esophageal achalasia, excluding cases of reoperation, underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication (LHD) according to our clinical pathway. Three-hundred and twenty-seven patients underwent LHD with five incisions (conventional approach), while the other 32 patients underwent RPS, including eight via SILS. The clinical data were collected in a prospective fashion and retrospectively reviewed. We selected 24 patients matched for gender, age and morphologic type with patients in the RPS group from among the 327 patients (C group). The surgical outcomes were compared between the C and RPS groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in the duration of symptoms, dysphagia score, chest pain score, shape of the distal esophagus and esophageal clearance. The operative time was significantly longer in the RPS group than in the C group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the length of postoperative hospital stay or rates of bleeding, mucosal injury of the esophagus and/or stomach and postoperative complications. The symptom scores significantly improved after surgery in both groups (p < 0.001). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the C group and RPS group in terms of the postoperative symptom scores or satisfaction scores after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical outcomes of RPS for achalasia are comparable to those obtained with the conventional method.