Laparoscopic treatment of mesenteric avulsion and intestinal perforation after blunt abdominal trauma: A report of a case

Diagnosis of small intestinal microperforation by cell morphology detection in abdominal puncture fluid: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Although abdominal computed tomography angiography (CTA) may be a gold standard for early diagnosis of small intestinal microperforation, early missed and delayed diagnosis are often important factors leading to poor prognosis. The cellular morphology diagnosis of abdominal puncture fluid (DAPF) or diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) may have unexpected clinical outcomes.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of small bowel microperforation which dues to BAT. A 39-year-old male with a chief complaint of "multiple injuries to the whole body from a car accident within 7 hours" was admitted to the trauma center. The first abdominal CTA ruled out perforation of abdominal parenchymatous organs and gastrointestinal tract. Subsequently, the patient underwent emergency surgery for traumatic shock, followed by clinical manifestations of persistent fever and septic shock. After diagnostic abdominal puncture fluid cell morphology examination, intestinal perforation was first considered.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Routine examination of abdominal puncture fluid can usually roughly determine the condition of visceral trauma, especially quickly and conveniently determine whether there is intra-peritoneal bleeding. However specific diagnostic components which were found in the cell images of abdominal puncture fluid also showed the clinical value of cellular morphology of DAPF.

CONCLUSION

The cellular morphology examination of DAPF/DPL may be the simplest, fastest, and most effective method for diagnosing small intestinal perforation due to blunt abdominal trauma(BAT). The value of DAPF /DPL in traumatic gastrointestinal injury cannot be ignored, especially for patients with BAT.

Seat belt syndrome is caused by a different mechanism: A case report

Introduction and importance

Seat belt syndrome is associated with multiple visceral injuries and vertebral burst fractures. Small Intestinal perforations are seen in 5–15 % of blunt abdominal trauma. In our case, we will report a case that presented small intestinal perforation and thoracic vertebral fracture caused by a different mechanism.

Case presentation

Previously healthy 48-year-old male presented to the emergency department following falling from 15 feats height. He was a paraplegic with a sensory level at T12. He did not have a clinical feature of spinal shock. He was complaining of epigastric and central abdominal pain and tenderness and was diagnosed to have a proximal Jejunal perforation associated with an unstable fracture of T12 causing spinal compression. Open intestinal repair followed by a posterior spinal exploration and pedicle screw fixation done.

Clinical discussion

Violent injury due to different mechanisms can have similar injuries to Seat belt syndrome. Ultrasonography is used to detect pneumoperitoneum, but the Contrast study is the gold standard to detect visceral injuries. The surgical approach to visceral injury depends on the patient's condition. But the laparoscopic approach has a more favorable postoperative outcome than open access.

Conclusion

Intestinal perforations associated with the neurological deficit are difficult to identify in an initial clinical assessment. Thoracolumbar fractures can associate with small bowel injuries during high-velocity trauma. Early identification and repair of the intestinal injury are important to prevent devastating complications and to improve neurological recovery after spinal surgery.

•

Seat belt syndrome is associated with a characteristic set of visceral injuries and spinal fractures.

•

Violent injuries caused by a different mechanism can cause similar injuries to Seat belt syndrome.

•

Thorough clinical examination with ultrasonography and contrast studies helps to detect visceral injuries.