1
|
Cata JP, Soni B, Bhavsar S, Pillai PS, Rypinski TA, Deva A, Siewerdsen JH, Soliz JM. Forecasting intraoperative hypotension during hepatobiliary surgery. J Clin Monit Comput 2024:10.1007/s10877-024-01223-5. [PMID: 39317921 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-024-01223-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2024] [Accepted: 09/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
Prediction and avoidance of intraoperative hypotension (IOH) can lead to less postoperative morbidity. Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being applied to predict IOH. We hypothesize that incorporating demographic and physiological features in an ML model will improve the performance of IOH prediction. In addition, we added a "dial" feature to alter prediction performance. An ML prediction model was built based on a multivariate random forest (RF) trained algorithm using 13 physiologic time series and patient demographic data (age, sex, and BMI) for adult patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery. A novel implementation was developed with an adjustable, multi-model voting (MMV) approach to improve performance in the challenging context of a dynamic, sliding window for which the propensity of data is normal (negative for IOH). The study cohort included 85% of subjects exhibiting at least one IOH event. Males constituted 70% of the cohort, median age was 55.8 years, and median BMI was 27.7. The multivariate model yielded average AUC = 0.97 in the static context of a single prediction made up to 8 min before a possible IOH event, and it outperformed a univariate model based on MAP-only (average AUC = 0.83). The MMV model demonstrated AUC = 0.96, PPV = 0.89, and NPV = 0.98 within the challenging context of a dynamic sliding window across 40 min prior to a possible IOH event. We present a novel ML model to predict IOH with a distinctive "dial" on sensitivity and specificity to predict first IOH episode during liver resection surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan P Cata
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group (ASORG), Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bhavin Soni
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Surgical Data Science Program, Institute for Data Science in Oncology (IDSO), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shreyas Bhavsar
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Parvathy Sudhir Pillai
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tatiana A Rypinski
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anshuj Deva
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Surgical Data Science Program, Institute for Data Science in Oncology (IDSO), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jose M Soliz
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group (ASORG), Houston, TX, USA.
- Surgical Data Science Program, Institute for Data Science in Oncology (IDSO), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu H, Liu Y, Wei Y. Impact of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease on the outcomes following laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-11239-2. [PMID: 39266759 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11239-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) on laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of LLR for MAFLD-HCC and Non-MAFLD-HCC. METHODS Patients with HCC who received LLR between October 2017 and July 2021 were enrolled. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to generate adjusted comparisons. Both short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated accordingly. RESULTS A total of 887 patients were enrolled, with 140 in MAFLD group and 747 in Non-MAFLD group. After IPTW adjustment, baseline factors were well matched. The MAFLD group was associated with more blood loss (210 vs 150 ml, p = 0.022), but with similar postoperative hospital stays and complication rates. The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 97.4% and 92.5% in MAFLD group, and 97.5% and 88.3% in Non-MAFLD group, respectively (p = 0.14). The 1- and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 84.8% and 62.9% in MAFLD group, and 80.2% and 58.8% in Non-MAFLD group, respectively (p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS LLR for MAFLD-HCC was associated with more blood loss but with comparable postoperative recovery and long-term survival compared with Non-MAFLD-HCC patients. LLR is feasible and safe for HCC patients with MAFLD background.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongwei Xu
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yani Liu
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yonggang Wei
- Division of Liver Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guo Xue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saleh M, Pascual F, Ghallab M, Wu AGR, Chin KM, Ratti F, Giglio MC, Garatti M, Nghia PP, Kato Y, Lim C, Herman P, Coelho FF, Schmelzle M, Pratschke J, Aghayan DL, Liu Q, Marino MV, Belli A, Chiow AKH, Sucandy I, Ivanecz A, Di Benedetto F, Choi SH, Lee JH, Park JO, Prieto M, Guzman Y, Fondevila C, Efanov M, Rotellar F, Choi GH, Robles-Campos R, Kadam P, Sutcliffe RP, Troisi RI, Tang CN, Chong CC, D'Hondt M, Dalla Valle B, Ruzzenente A, Kingham TP, Scatton O, Liu R, Mejia A, Mishima K, Wakabayashi G, Lopez-Ben S, Wang X, Ferrero A, Ettorre GM, Vivarelli M, Mazzaferro V, Giuliante F, Yong CC, Yin M, Monden K, Geller D, Chen KH, Sugioka A, Edwin B, Cheung TT, Long TCD, Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Soubrane O, Fuks D, Han HS, Cherqui D, Goh BKP. Factors Associated with and Impact of Open Conversion in Laparoscopic and Robotic Minor Liver Resections: An International Multicenter Study of 10,541 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:5615-5630. [PMID: 38879668 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15498-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the increasing widespread adoption and experience in minimally invasive liver resections (MILR), open conversion occurs not uncommonly even with minor resections and as been reported to be associated with inferior outcomes. We aimed to identify risk factors for and outcomes of open conversion in patients undergoing minor hepatectomies. We also studied the impact of approach (laparoscopic or robotic) on outcomes. METHODS This is a post-hoc analysis of 20,019 patients who underwent RLR and LLR across 50 international centers between 2004-2020. Risk factors for and perioperative outcomes of open conversion were analysed. Multivariate and propensity score-matched analysis were performed to control for confounding factors. RESULTS Finally, 10,541 patients undergoing either laparoscopic (LLR; 89.1%) or robotic (RLR; 10.9%) minor liver resections (wedge resections, segmentectomies) were included. Multivariate analysis identified LLR, earlier period of MILR, malignant pathology, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, previous abdominal surgery, larger tumor size, and posterosuperior location as significant independent predictors of open conversion. The most common reason for conversion was technical issues (44.7%), followed by bleeding (27.2%), and oncological reasons (22.3%). After propensity score matching (PSM) of baseline characteristics, patients requiring open conversion had poorer outcomes compared with successful MILR cases as evidenced by longer operative times, more blood loss, higher requirement for perioperative transfusion, longer duration of hospitalization and higher morbidity, reoperation, and 90-day mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS Multiple risk factors were associated with conversion of MILR even for minor hepatectomies, and open conversion was associated with significantly poorer perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansour Saleh
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Franco Pascual
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Mohammed Ghallab
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Andrew G R Wu
- Ministry of Health Holdings Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ken-Min Chin
- Ministry of Health Holdings Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Mariano Cesare Giglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Garatti
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Phan Phuoc Nghia
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Yutaro Kato
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Chetana Lim
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Paulo Herman
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Davit L Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Qiu Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy
- Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center-IRCCS-G, Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- AdventHealth Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - James O Park
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mikel Prieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Yoelimar Guzman
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gi-Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Prashant Kadam
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Chung Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Charing C Chong
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Bernardo Dalla Valle
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, GB Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, GB Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Alejandro Mejia
- The Liver Institute, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Kohei Mishima
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Santiago Lopez-Ben
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, IdIBGi, Girona, Spain
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, United Hospital of Ancona, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Polytechnic, University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Chee Chien Yong
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Mengqiu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kuo-Hsin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Tran Cong Duy Long
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
- Surgery Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-National University Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu L, Zhang M, Zhang X, Xiang Q. Effects of enhance recovery after surgery nursing program on the surgical site wound infection in patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J 2024; 21:e14490. [PMID: 37973531 PMCID: PMC10898384 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Our study aimed to investigate the effects of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) nursing program on surgical site wound infections (SSWI) and postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) for hepatocellular carcinoma. Computer searches of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases were conducted to gather randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that were published from inception to September 2023. The target studies evaluated the effects of the ERAS nursing program in patients undergoing LH for hepatocellular carcinoma. Two independent authors screened the literature, extracted the data and performed quality assessments. Dichotomous variables were analysed using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), as effect analysis statistics. Stata software (version 17.0) was used for data analysis. Eleven RCTs with 765 patients were included, with 383 patients in the ERAS group and 382 in the control group. The results revealed that the incidence of SSWI (OR = 0.32, 95%CI:0.15-0.71, p = 0.004) and postoperative complications (OR = 0.23, 95%CI:0.15-0.34, p < 0.001) were both significantly reduced in the ERAS group, compared with the control group. The ERAS nursing program, when applied to patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatic cancer resection, can effectively reduce the incidence of SSWI and postoperative complications, thus promoting postoperative recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Liu
- Department of GastroenterologyChongqing University Cancer HospitalChongqingChina
| | - Meilin Zhang
- Department of General Internal MedicineChongqing University Cancer HospitalChongqingChina
| | - Xu Zhang
- Department of GastroenterologyChongqing University Cancer HospitalChongqingChina
| | - Qing Xiang
- Department of PharmacyChongqing University Cancer HospitalChongqingChina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fukumori D, Tschuor C, Penninga L, Hillingsø J, Svendsen LB, Larsen PN. Learning curves in robot-assisted minimally invasive liver surgery at a high-volume center in Denmark: Report of the first 100 patients and review of literature. Scand J Surg 2023; 112:164-172. [PMID: 36718674 DOI: 10.1177/14574969221146003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive liver surgery is evolving worldwide, and robot-assisted liver surgery (RLS) can deliver obvious benefits for patients. However, so far no large case series have documented the learning curve for RLS. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study for robotic liver surgery (RLS) from June 2019 to June 2022 where 100 patients underwent RLS by the same surgical team. Patients' variables, short-term follow-up, and the learning curve were analyzed. A review of the literature describing the learning curve in RLS was also conducted. RESULTS Mean patient age was 63.1 years. The median operating time was 246 min and median estimated blood loss was 100 mL. Thirty-two patients underwent subsegmentectomy, 18 monosegmentectomies, 25 bisegmentectomies, and 25 major hepatectomies. One patient (1.0%) required conversion to open surgery. Five patients (5%) experienced postoperative major complications, and no mortalities occurred. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days. R0 resection was achieved in 93.4% of the malignant cases. The learning curve consisted of three stages; there were no significant differences in operative time, transfusion rate, or complication rate among the three groups. Postoperative complications were similar in each group despite an increase in surgical difficulty scores. The learning effect was highlighted by significantly shorter hospital stays in cohorts I, II, and III, respectively. The included systematic review suggested that the learning curve for RLS is similar to, or shorter, than that of laparoscopic liver surgery. CONCLUSIONS In our experience, RLS has achieved good clinical results, albeit in the short term. Standardization of training leads to increasing proficiency in RLS with reduced blood loss and low complication rates even in more advanced liver resections. Our study suggests that a minimum of 30 low-to-moderate difficulty robotic procedures should be performed before proceeding to more difficult resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Fukumori
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Blegdamsvej 9 2100 Copenhagen Ø Denmark
| | - Christoph Tschuor
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Luit Penninga
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Hillingsø
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Bo Svendsen
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- CAMES, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Nørgaard Larsen
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Coelho FF, Herman P, Kruger JAP, Wu AGR, Chin KM, Hasegawa K, Zhang W, Alzoubi M, Aghayan DL, Siow TF, Scatton O, Kingham TP, Marino MV, Mazzaferro V, Chiow AKH, Sucandy I, Ivanecz A, Choi SH, Lee JH, Gastaca M, Vivarelli M, Giuliante F, Ruzzenente A, Yong CC, Dokmak S, Fondevila C, Efanov M, Morise Z, Di Benedetto F, Brustia R, Valle RD, Boggi U, Geller D, Belli A, Memeo R, Gruttadauria S, Mejia A, Park JO, Rotellar F, Choi GH, Robles-Campos R, Wang X, Sutcliffe RP, Pratschke J, Lai ECH, Chong CCN, D'Hondt M, Monden K, Lopez-Ben S, Liu R, Ferrero A, Ettorre GM, Cipriani F, Cherqui D, Liang X, Soubrane O, Wakabayashi G, Troisi RI, Yin M, Cheung TT, Sugioka A, Han HS, Long TCD, Fuks D, Abu Hilal M, Chen KH, Aldrighetti L, Edwin B, Goh BKP. Impact of liver cirrhosis, the severity of cirrhosis, and portal hypertension on the outcomes of minimally invasive left lateral sectionectomies for primary liver malignancies. Surgery 2023; 174:581-592. [PMID: 37301612 PMCID: PMC10986843 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.04.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of cirrhosis and portal hypertension on perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive left lateral sectionectomies remains unclear. We aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes between patients with preserved and compromised liver function (noncirrhotics versus Child-Pugh A) when undergoing minimally invasive left lateral sectionectomies. In addition, we aimed to determine if the extent of cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A versus B) and the presence of portal hypertension had a significant impact on perioperative outcomes. METHODS This was an international multicenter retrospective analysis of 1,526 patients who underwent minimally invasive left lateral sectionectomies for primary liver malignancies at 60 centers worldwide between 2004 and 2021. In the study, 1,370 patients met the inclusion criteria and formed the final study group. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative outcomes of these patients were compared. To minimize confounding factors, 1:1 propensity score matching and coarsened exact matching were performed. RESULTS The study group comprised 559, 753, and 58 patients who did not have cirrhosis, Child-Pugh A, and Child-Pugh B cirrhosis, respectively. Six-hundred and thirty patients with cirrhosis had portal hypertension, and 170 did not. After propensity score matching and coarsened exact matching, Child-Pugh A patients with cirrhosis undergoing minimally invasive left lateral sectionectomies had longer operative time, higher intraoperative blood loss, higher transfusion rate, and longer hospital stay than patients without cirrhosis. The extent of cirrhosis did not significantly impact perioperative outcomes except for a longer duration of hospital stay. CONCLUSION Liver cirrhosis adversely affected the intraoperative technical difficulty and perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive left lateral sectionectomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liver Surgery Unit, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Paulo Herman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liver Surgery Unit, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jaime A P Kruger
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liver Surgery Unit, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Andrew G R Wu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ken-Min Chin
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wanguang Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center and Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | | | - Davit L Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tiing-Foong Siow
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy and General Surgery Department, F Tappeiner Hospital, Merano, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano and University of Milan, Italy
| | - Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mikel Gastaca
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, United Hospital of Ancona, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics University of Verona, GB Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Chee-Chien Yong
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, University Paris Cite, Clichy, France
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain and General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Zenichi Morise
- Department of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Raffaele Dalla Valle
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA, USA
| | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center-IRCCS-G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatc-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy, Palermo, Italy; Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Italy
| | | | - James O Park
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain & Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eric C H Lai
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Charing C N Chong
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, China
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Santiago Lopez-Ben
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, IdIBGi, Girona, Spain
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Mengqiu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, China
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tran Cong Duy Long
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Kuo-Hsin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Duke National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fukumori D, Tschuor C, Penninga L, Hillingsø J, Svendsen LB, Larsen PN. Robot-assisted minimally invasive liver surgery in elderly patients: A single-centre, propensity score- matched study. Int J Med Robot 2023:e2556. [PMID: 37522365 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to evaluate the short-term results of robot-assisted minimally invasive liver surgery(Robot-assisted liver surgery (RLS)) in elderly patients. METHODS Between November 2019 and July 2022, RLS was performed on 100 consecutive patients. Patients were divided into a middle-aged group (Group1:<75years) and an elderly group(Group2:≧75years). A propensity score matching(PSM) analysis with a ratio of 1:1 was performed. RESULTS After PSM, there were 28 patients in each group. There were no significant differences in clinicopathologic characteristics, type of resection and intraoperative variables. Postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were comparable in Groups 1 and 2. In a comparison between minor and major hepatectomy in Group 2, there were no significant differences in any of the factors. CONCLUSIONS The study showed that RLS for patients over 75years had similar short-term outcomes as for younger patients down to middle-aged, especially the risk of perioperative complications was comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Fukumori
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christoph Tschuor
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Luit Penninga
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Hillingsø
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Bo Svendsen
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- CAMES, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Nørgaard Larsen
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Outcomes and Patient Selection in Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection for HCC and Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041179. [PMID: 36831521 PMCID: PMC9954110 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) are the two most common malignant tumors that require liver resection. While liver transplantation is the best treatment for HCC, organ shortages and high costs limit the availability of this option for many patients and make resection the mainstay of treatment. For patients with CRLM, surgical resection with negative margins is the only potentially curative option. Over the last two decades, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been increasingly adopted for the resection of a variety of tumors and was found to have similar long-term outcomes compared to open liver resection (OLR) while offering the benefits of improved short-term outcomes. In this review, we discuss the current literature on the outcomes of LLR vs. OLR for patients with HCC and CRLM. Although the use of LLR for HCC and CRLM is increasing, it is not appropriate for all patients. We describe an approach to selecting patients best-suited for LLR. The four common difficulty-scoring systems for LLR are summarized. Additionally, we review the current evidence behind the emerging robotically assisted liver resection technology.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bo Z, Chen Z, Chen B, Yang J, Zhao Z, Yang Y, Ma J, He Q, Yu H, Zheng C, Chen K, Wang Y, Chen G. Development of sarcopenia-based nomograms predicting postoperative complications of benign liver diseases undergoing hepatectomy: A multicenter cohort study. Front Nutr 2023; 10:1040297. [PMID: 36845061 PMCID: PMC9950394 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1040297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Sarcopenia has a remarkable negative impact on patients with liver diseases. We aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative sarcopenia on the short-term outcomes after hepatectomy in patients with benign liver diseases. Methods A total of 558 patients with benign liver diseases undergoing hepatectomy were prospectively reviewed. Both the muscle mass and strength were measured to define sarcopenia. Postoperative outcomes including complications, major complications and comprehensive complication index (CCI) were compared among four subgroups classified by muscle mass and strength. Predictors of complications, major complications and high CCI were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Nomograms based on predictors were constructed and calibration cures were performed to verify the performance. Results 120 patients were involved for analysis after exclusion. 33 patients were men (27.5%) and the median age was 54.0 years. The median grip strength was 26.5 kg and the median skeletal muscle index (SMI) was 44.4 cm2/m2. Forty-six patients (38.3%) had complications, 19 patients (15.8%) had major complications and 27 patients (22.5%) had a CCI ≥ 26.2. Age (p = 0.005), SMI (p = 0.005), grip strength (p = 0.018), surgical approach (p = 0.036), and operation time (p = 0.049) were predictors of overall complications. Child-Pugh score (p = 0.037), grip strength (p = 0.004) and surgical approach (p = 0.006) were predictors of major complications. SMI (p = 0.047), grip strength (p < 0.001) and surgical approach (p = 0.014) were predictors of high CCI. Among the four subgroups, patients with reduced muscle mass and strength showed the worst short-term outcomes. The nomograms for complications and major complications were validated by calibration curves and showed satisfactory performance. Conclusion Sarcopenia has an adverse impact on the short-term outcomes after hepatectomy in patients with benign liver diseases and valuable sarcopenia-based nomograms were constructed to predict postoperative complications and major complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyuan Bo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Hepato-Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ziyan Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Bo Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Jinhuan Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Zhengxiao Zhao
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi Yang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Qikuan He
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Haitao Yu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Chongming Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Kaiwen Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Yi Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,*Correspondence: Yi Wang, ✉
| | - Gang Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China,Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Hepato-Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China,Gang Chen, ✉
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang Z, Linn YL, Chong Y, Chung AY, Chan CY, Goh BKP. Laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe liver resections: a 1:2 propensity score-matched controlled study based on a single institution experience. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:2157-2162. [PMID: 35692120 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the wide use of laparoscopy for liver resection, laparoscopic caudate lobe resections(L-CLR) remain technically challenging, only attempted by experts in the field. The primary objective of this study was to determine the safety and compare the perioperative outcomes of L-CLR with O-CLR based on our single institution experience in a 1:2 propensity score-matched controlled study based on our single institution experience. METHODS Between 2004 and 2020, 67 consecutive patients who underwent CLR at Singapore General Hospital were identified. Propensity score matching (PSM) of laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe resections(O-CLR) was performed in a 1:2 ratio with no replacements using nearest neighbour matching method. RESULTS L-CLR was associated with a significantly decreased median blood loss (150 mL versus 500 mL, P = 0.001) and a decreased median post-operative stay (3 days versus 7.5 days, P = <0.01) in the unmatched cohorts. After 1:2 propensity score matching, these results were again demonstrated with a significantly lower blood loss (150 mL versus 400 mL, P = 0.016) and a shorter postoperative stay (3 days versus 7 days, P = <0.01) in favour of L-CLR. 30-day readmission and major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade > 2) rates were all in favour of L-CLR as well but could not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION L-CLR can be safely performed by experienced surgeons. It is associated with decreased blood loss and shorter perioperative stay compared to O-CLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongkai Wang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Division of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Department of General Surgery, Woodlands Health, Singapore
| | - Yun-Le Linn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Division of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yvette Chong
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Division of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alexander Y Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Division of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.,Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Division of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.,Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Division of Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.,Liver Transplant Service, Singhealth Duke-National University of Singapore Transplant Center, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
External validation of different difficulty scoring systems of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:3732-3749. [PMID: 34406470 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08687-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several difficulty scoring systems (DSSs) have been proposed for evaluating difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and no study has validated their performance in a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-only cohort at the same time. METHODS All cases with HCC that underwent LLR from January 2015 to December 2020 in our center were retrospectively collected. Performance of the IWATE-DSS, Halls-DSS, Hasegawa-DSS, and Kawaguchi-DSS in predicting perioperative outcomes was evaluated. Subgroup analyses were conducted to compare perioperative outcomes between surgeons on the learning curve and surgeons that have gone through the learning curve. RESULTS For all four DSSs, there were significant distributions of applying bleeding control, surgical time, estimated blood loss, postoperative major complications, and postoperative hospital stay among different groups of each DSS (P all < 0.05). Conversion to laparotomy or not was significantly distributed in different groups of the IWATE-DSS (P = 0.006) and Halls-DSS (P = 0.022), while it was not in the Hasegawa-DSS (P = 0.056) and Kawaguchi-DSS (P = 0.183). Trend tests showed that the conversion rates increased with higher DSS points in the IWATE-DSS (P < 0.001) and the Kawaguchi-DSS (P = 0.021), while not in the Halls-DSS (P = 0.064) and the Hasegawa-DSS (P = 0.068). In the medium and advanced/expert difficulty-level subgroups defined by the IWATE-DSS, there were larger estimated blood loss (P in medium-difficulty group = 0.009; P in the advanced/expert difficulty group = 0.004) and longer postoperative hospital stay (P in the medium-difficulty group = 0.012; P in the advanced/expert group = 0.035) in the learner-performed cases. CONCLUSIONS All DSSs performed well in predicting applying bleeding control, surgical time, estimated blood loss, postoperative major complications, and postoperative hospital stay, while only the IWATE-DSS was able to predict whether conversion to laparotomy or not for HCC patients underwent LLR. The IWATE-DSS was also able to help surgeons on the LLR learning curve choose cases and guide clinical practices.
Collapse
|
12
|
Bae SJ, Cho HD, Kim KH, Hwang S, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Ha TY, Song GW, Jung DH, Park GC, Yoon YI, Lee SG. Pure laparoscopic versus open left lateral sectionectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2022; 26:133-137. [PMID: 35607809 PMCID: PMC9136418 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.21-161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Anatomical resection has superior oncologic outcomes over non-anatomical resection in hepatocellular carcinoma, and left lateral sectionectomy is the simplest and easiest perform anatomical resection procedure among liver resections. The purpose of this study was to find out the safety and feasibility of pure laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (PLLLS) for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods Patients who underwent left lateral sectionectomy at a tertiary referral hospital, from August 2007 to April 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective study. After matching the 1 : 3 propensity score, 17 open and 51 pure laparoscopic cases were selected out of 102 cases of total left lateral resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. The group was analyzed in terms of patient demographics, preoperative data, and postoperative outcomes. Results During the study period, there was no open conversion case. The mean operative time and complication were not statistically significant different between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival and overall survival had no statistical between the two groups. There were no mortality cases, and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the PLLLS group than in the open left lateral sectionectomy (OLLS) group. Conclusions The oncologic outcomes and complication rate were the same in the PLLLS and OLLS groups. However, the hospital stay was shorter in the PLLLS group than in the OLLS group. The present study findings demonstrate that the PLLLS is a safe and feasible procedure for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se-Jong Bae
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hwui-Dong Cho
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki-Hun Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shin Hwang
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul-Soo Ahn
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Deok-Bog Moon
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Yong Ha
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gi-Won Song
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Hwan Jung
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gil-Chun Park
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-In Yoon
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Gyu Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Minimally Invasive vs Open Major Hepatectomies for Liver Malignancies: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:1041-1053. [PMID: 35059983 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05226-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of evidence with regards to minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) favors its application in minor hepatectomies. We conducted a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis to determine its feasibility and safety in major hepatectomies (MIMH) for liver malignancies. METHODS Retrospective review of 130 patients who underwent MIMH and 490 patients who underwent open major hepatectomy (OMH) for malignant pathologies was performed. PSM in a 1:1 ratio identified two groups of patients with similar baseline clinicopathological characteristics. Perioperative outcomes were then compared. Major hepatectomies included traditional major (>3 segments) and technical major hepatectomies (right anterior and right posterior sectionectomies). RESULTS Both cohorts were well-matched for baseline characteristics after PSM. Of 130 MIMH cases, there were 12 conversions to open. Comparison of perioperative outcomes demonstrated a significant association of MIMH with longer operation time and more frequent application of Pringle's maneuver (PM), but decreased postoperative stay. These results were consistent on a subgroup analysis that only included patients undergoing traditional major hepatectomies. A second subgroup analysis restricted to cirrhotic patients demonstrated that while perioperative outcomes were equivalent, MIMH was similarly associated with a longer operative time. Subset analyses of resections performed after 2015 demonstrated that MIMH was additionally associated with a lower postoperative morbidity compared to OMH. CONCLUSION Comparison of perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes between MIMH and OMH for malignancies demonstrated that MIMH is feasible and safe. It is associated with a shorter hospital stay at the expense of a longer operation time compared to OMH.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kim WJ, Park PJ, Choi SB, Kim WB. Case report of pure single-port robotic left lateral sectionectomy using the da Vinci SP system. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e28248. [PMID: 34941098 PMCID: PMC8701933 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since its first appearance in the early 1990s, laparoscopic hepatic resection has become increasingly accepted and recognized as safe as laparotomy. The recent introduction of robotic surgery systems has brought new innovations to the field of minimally invasive surgery, such as laparoscopic surgery. The da Vinci line of surgical systems has recently released a true single-port platform called the da Vinci SP system, which has 3 fully wristed and elbowed instruments and a flexible camera in a single 2.5 cm cannula. We present the first case of robotic liver resection using the da Vinci SP system and demonstrate the technical feasibility of this platform. PATIENT CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSIS A 63-year-old woman presented with elevated liver function test results and abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography showed multiple intrahepatic duct stones in the left lateral section and distal common bile duct stones near the ampulla of Vater. INTERVENTIONS The docking time was 8 minute. The patient underwent successful da Vinci SP with a total operation time of 135 minute. The estimated blood loss was 50.0 ml. No significant intraoperative events were observed. OUTCOMES The numerical pain intensity score was 3/10 in the immediate postoperative period and 1/10 on postoperative day 2. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 after verifying that the CT scan did not show any surgical complications. CONCLUSION We report a technique of left lateral sectionectomy, without the use of an additional port, via the da Vinci SP system. The present case suggests that minor hepatic resection is technically feasible and safe with the new da Vinci SP system in select patients. For the active application of the da Vinci SP system in hepatobiliary surgery, further device development and research are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wan-Joon Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea
| | - Pyoung-Jae Park
- Division of Transplantation Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sae-Byeol Choi
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wan-Bae Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chiow AKH, Fuks D, Choi GH, Syn N, Sucandy I, Marino MV, Prieto M, Chong CC, Lee JH, Efanov M, Kingham TP, Choi SH, Sutcliffe RP, Troisi RI, Pratschke J, Cheung TT, Wang X, Liu R, D’Hondt M, Chan CY, Tang CN, Han HS, Goh BKP. International multicentre propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy. Br J Surg 2021; 108:1513-1520. [PMID: 34750608 PMCID: PMC8743054 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive right posterior sectionectomy (RPS) is a technically challenging procedure. This study was designed to determine outcomes following robotic RPS (R-RPS) and laparoscopic RPS (L-RPS). METHODS An international multicentre retrospective analysis of patients undergoing R-RPS versus those who had purely L-RPS at 21 centres from 2010 to 2019 was performed. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were analysed retrospectively from a central database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, with analysis of 1 : 2 and 1 : 1 matched cohorts. RESULTS Three-hundred and forty patients, including 96 who underwent R-RPS and 244 who had L-RPS, met the study criteria and were included. The median operating time was 295 minutes and there were 25 (7.4 per cent) open conversions. Ninety-seven (28.5 per cent) patients had cirrhosis and 56 (16.5 per cent) patients required blood transfusion. Overall postoperative morbidity rate was 22.1 per cent and major morbidity rate was 6.8 per cent. The median postoperative stay was 6 days. After 1 : 1 matching of 88 R-RPS and L-RPS patients, median (i.q.r.) blood loss (200 (100-400) versus 450 (200-900) ml, respectively; P < 0.001), major blood loss (> 500 ml; P = 0.001), need for intraoperative blood transfusion (10.2 versus 23.9 per cent, respectively; P = 0.014), and open conversion rate (2.3 versus 11.4 per cent, respectively; P = 0.016) were lower in the R-RPS group. Similar results were found in the 1 : 2 matched groups (66 R-RPS versus 132 L-RPS patients). CONCLUSION R-RPS and L-RPS can be performed in expert centres with good outcomes in well selected patients. R-RPS was associated with reduced blood loss and lower open conversion rates than L-RPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Gi-Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- AdventHealth Tampa, Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy and Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Mikel Prieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Charing C Chong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tan-To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Duke-National University Singapore Medical School, Singapore
| | - Chung Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and Duke-National University Singapore Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhu L, Liu Y, Hu M, Zhao Z, Li C, Zhang X, Tan X, Wang F, Liu R. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic liver resection in ordinary cases of left lateral sectionectomy. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:4923-4931. [PMID: 34750706 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08846-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopy was considered the standard method of left lateral sectionectomy. The robotic approach showed advantages in complex cases of left lateral sectionectomy. However, the impact of the robotic system on ordinary cases is still unknown. METHODS Retrospective review of consecutive robotic left lateral sectionectomy (R-LLS) and laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (L-LLS) from January 2015 to December 2019. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the effects of surgical method and surgical complexity on postoperative length of stay, surgical and overall cost. RESULTS 258 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive left lateral sectionectomy were analyzed. L-LLS had comparable outcomes and decreased surgery (USD 2416.3 vs 4624.5; p < 0.001) and overall costs (USD 8004.5 vs 11897.1; p < 0.001) compared with R-LLS in the ordinary-case group, whereas R-LLS was associated with shorter postoperative LOS (5.0 vs 3.5 days; p = 0.004) in the complex-case group. On multivariable analysis, R-LLS was predictive of shorter postoperative LOS [odds ratio (OR) 0.388, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.198-0.760, p = 0.006], whereas R-LLS was predictive of higher surgery (OR 65.640, 95% CI 17.406-247.535, p < 0.001) and overall costs (OR 102.233, 95% CI 22.241-469.931, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Results of this study showed no clinical benefit to the R-LLS compared with L-LLS in ordinary cases. R-LLS had potential advantages in selected complex cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Zhu
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, No. 1, Donggangxi Rd, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Yanzhe Liu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Minggen Hu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Zhiming Zhao
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Chenggang Li
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Xuan Zhang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Xianglong Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Fei Wang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Rong Liu
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, No. 1, Donggangxi Rd, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China. .,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The General Hospital of People's Liberation Army, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Heinrich S, Seehofer D, Corvinus F, Tripke V, Huber T, Hüttl F, Penzkofer L, Mittler J, Abu Hilal M, Lang H. [Advantages and future perspectives of laparoscopic liver surgery]. Chirurg 2021; 92:542-549. [PMID: 32995902 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01288-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS) is increasingly utilized worldwide due to several potential advantages over open liver surgery. OBJECTIVE Analysis and presentation of the advantages and disadvantages of LLS in comparison to open surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS Analysis of clinically relevant factors of minimally invasive liver surgery in comparison to open liver surgery in the current literature. RESULTS In addition to obvious cosmetic advantages, the current literature shows advantages regarding length of hospital stay and quality of life after LLC. In contrast to major liver resections, parenchyma-preserving resections often appear cost-neutral due a shorter postoperative hospital stay compared to conventional liver resections. In addition to particular personnel requirements, LLS also has technical prerequisites, such as a dedicated intraoperative ultrasound system. Furthermore, contrast-enhanced laparoscopic examinations are possible and ultrasound information can be fused with preoperative imaging. Virtual reality technology and 3‑dimensional printing are currently under investigation to improve the intraoperative anatomical orientation of LLS. CONCLUSION The current literature reveals significant advantages for LLS so that this procedure should be further developed in Germany in order to offer this technique to as many patients as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Heinrich
- Klinik f. Allgemein‑, Viszeral- u. Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik u. Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Florian Corvinus
- Klinik f. Allgemein‑, Viszeral- u. Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Verena Tripke
- Klinik f. Allgemein‑, Viszeral- u. Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Tobias Huber
- Klinik f. Allgemein‑, Viszeral- u. Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Florentine Hüttl
- Klinik f. Allgemein‑, Viszeral- u. Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Lea Penzkofer
- Klinik f. Allgemein‑, Viszeral- u. Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Jens Mittler
- Klinik f. Allgemein‑, Viszeral- u. Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero Multispecialistico, Brescia, Italien
| | - Hauke Lang
- Klinik f. Allgemein‑, Viszeral- u. Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
International multicenter propensity score matched study on laparoscopic versus open left lateral sectionectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:707-714. [PMID: 33039275 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite a lack of high-level evidence, current guidelines recommend laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LLLS) as the routine approach over open LLS (OLLS). Randomized studies and propensity score matched studies on LLLS vs OLLS for all indications, including malignancy, are lacking. METHODS This international multicenter propensity score matched retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing LLLS or OLLS in six centers from three European countries (January 2000-December 2016). Propensity scores were calculated based on nine preoperative variables and LLLS and OLLS were matched in a 1:1 ratio. Short-term operative outcomes were compared using paired tests. RESULTS A total of 560 patients were included. Out of 200 LLLS, 139 could be matched to 139 OLLS. After matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced. LLLS was associated with shorter operative time (144 (110-200) vs 199 (138-283) minutes, P < 0.001), less blood loss (100 (50-300) vs 350 (100-750) mL, P = 0.005) and a 3-day shorter postoperative hospital stay (4 (3-7) vs 7 (5-9) days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION This international multicenter propensity score matched study confirms the superiority of LLLS over OLLS based on shorter postoperative hospital stay, operative time, and less blood loss thus validating current guideline advice.
Collapse
|
19
|
Kim W, Kim K, Cho H, Namgoong J, Hwang S, Park J, Lee S. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomy in Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Liver Transpl 2021; 27:513-524. [PMID: 37160037 PMCID: PMC8246762 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy for transplantation has been well established over the past decade. This study aimed to assess its safety and feasibility in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) by comparing the surgical and long-term survival outcomes on both the donor and recipient sides between open and laparoscopic groups. The medical records of 100 patients (≤17 years old) who underwent ABO-compatible LDLT using a left lateral liver graft between May 2008 and June 2016 were analyzed. A total of 31 donors who underwent pure laparoscopic hepatectomy and their corresponding recipients were included in the study; 69 patients who underwent open living donor hepatectomy during the same period were included as a comparison group. To overcome bias from the different distributions of covariables among the patients in the 2 study groups, a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was performed. The mean follow-up periods were 92.9 and 92.7 months in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. The mean postoperative hospital stay of the donors was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (8.1 days) than in the open group (10.6 days; P < 0.001). Overall, the surgical complications in the donors and overall survival rate of recipients did not differ between the groups. Our data suggest that the laparoscopic environment was not associated with long-term graft survival during pediatric LDLT. In addition, the laparoscopic approach for the donors did not adversely affect the corresponding recipient's outcome. Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy for living donors is a safe, feasible, and reproducible procedure for pediatric liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wan‐Joon Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryKorea University Guro HospitalKorea University Medical CollegeSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Ki‐Hun Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Liver TransplantationDepartment of SurgeryAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Hwui‐Dong Cho
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Liver TransplantationDepartment of SurgeryAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Jung‐Man Namgoong
- Division of Pediatric SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Shin Hwang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Liver TransplantationDepartment of SurgeryAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Jeong‐Ik Park
- Department of SurgeryHaeundae Paik HospitalInje UniversityCollege of MedicineBusanKorea
| | - Sung‐Gyu Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Liver TransplantationDepartment of SurgeryAsan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chiow AKH, Rho SY, Wee IJY, Lee LS, Choi GH. Robotic ICG guided anatomical liver resection in a multi-centre cohort: an evolution from "positive staining" into "negative staining" method. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:475-482. [PMID: 32863114 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic major anatomical liver resection is challenging. The robotic liver resection (RLR) approach, with Firefly indocyanine green (ICG) imaging, was proposed to overcome the limitations of laparoscopy. The aim of this multi-centre international study was to evaluate the use of Firefly ICG imaging in anatomical RLR. METHODS A retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing RLR anatomical resection with intra-operative ICG administration from January 2015 to July 2018 were enrolled. Patients who underwent simultaneous or en-bloc resections of other organs were excluded. RESULTS A total of 52 patients were recruited of which 32 patients were healthy donors, 17 with malignancy and 3 for benign conditions. 12 patients had cirrhosis. 28 patients underwent a right hepatectomy (53.8%) with left hepatectomy performed with 18 patients. 40 patients underwent negative staining and 12 patients via direct portal vein injection for positive staining. ICG demarcation line was visualized in 43 patients and was clearer than the ischaemic demarcation line in 29 patients. All resections for malignancy had clear margins. There were no 30-day/inpatient mortalities. CONCLUSION Robotic ICG guided hepatectomy technique for anatomical liver resection is safe, feasible and has the benefit for improved visualization in healthy donors and cirrhotic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Seoung Yoon Rho
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ian J Y Wee
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lip Seng Lee
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Goh BKP. Letter regarding "Benchmark performance of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy and right hepatectomy in expert centers". J Hepatol 2020; 73:1576. [PMID: 32951914 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Singapore General Hospital; Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Duarte VC, Coelho FF, Valverde A, Danoussou D, Kruger JAP, Zuber K, Fonseca GM, Jeismann VB, Herman P, Lupinacci RM. Minimally invasive versus open right hepatectomy: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis. BMC Surg 2020; 20:260. [PMID: 33126885 PMCID: PMC7602349 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00919-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive liver resections (MILRs) have been increasingly performed in recent years. However, the majority of MILRs are actually minor or limited resections of peripheral lesions. Due to the technical complexity major hepatectomies remain challenging for minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the short and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive right hepatectomies (MIRHs) with contemporary patients undergoing open right hepatectomies (ORHs) METHODS: Consecutive patients submitted to anatomic right hepatectomies between January 2013 and December 2018 in two tertiary referral centers were studied. Study groups were compared on an intention-to-treat basis after propensity score matching (PSM). Overall survival (OS) analyses were performed for the entire cohort and specific etiologies subgroups RESULTS: During study period 178 right hepatectomies were performed. After matching, 37 patients were included in MIRH group and 60 in ORH group. The groups were homogenous for all baseline characteristics. MIRHs had significant lower blood loss (400 ml vs. 500 ml, P = 0.01), lower rate of minor complications (13.5% vs. 35%, P = 0.03) and larger resection margins (10 mm vs. 5 mm, P = 0.03) when compared to ORHs. Additionally, a non-significant decrease in hospital stay (ORH 9 days vs. MIRH 7 days, P = 0.09) was observed. No differences regarding the use of Pringle's maneuver, operative time, overall morbidity or perioperative mortality were observed. OS was similar between the groups (P = 0.13). Similarly, no difference in OS was found in subgroups of patients with primary liver tumors (P = 0.09) and liver metastasis (P = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS MIRHs are feasible and safe in experienced hands. Minimally invasive approach was associated with less blood loss, a significant reduction in minor perioperative complications, and did not negatively affect long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinícius Campos Duarte
- Liver Surgery Unit, Digestive Surgery Division, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255-9º Andar-sala 9025, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-900, Brazil.
| | - Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
- Liver Surgery Unit, Digestive Surgery Division, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255-9º Andar-sala 9025, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-900, Brazil
| | - Alain Valverde
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon Hospital, 125, Rue d'Avron, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Divia Danoussou
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon Hospital, 125, Rue d'Avron, 75020, Paris, France
| | - Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger
- Liver Surgery Unit, Digestive Surgery Division, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255-9º Andar-sala 9025, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-900, Brazil
| | - Kevin Zuber
- Research and Biostatistics Unit, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Gilton Marques Fonseca
- Liver Surgery Unit, Digestive Surgery Division, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255-9º Andar-sala 9025, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-900, Brazil
| | - Vagner Birk Jeismann
- Liver Surgery Unit, Digestive Surgery Division, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255-9º Andar-sala 9025, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-900, Brazil
| | - Paulo Herman
- Liver Surgery Unit, Digestive Surgery Division, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255-9º Andar-sala 9025, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-900, Brazil
| | - Renato Micelli Lupinacci
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon Hospital, 125, Rue d'Avron, 75020, Paris, France.,AP-HP, Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.,Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines/Paris Saclay University, UFR des Sciences de la Santé Simone Veil, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Darnis B, Mohkam K, Golse N, Vibert E, Cherqui D, Cauchy F, Soubrane O, Regimbeau JM, Dembinski J, Hardwigsen J, Bachelier P, Laurent C, Truant S, Millet G, Lesurtel M, Boleslawksi E, Mabrut JY. Long-term abdominal wall benefits of the laparoscopic approach in liver left lateral sectionectomy: a multicenter comparative study. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:5034-5042. [PMID: 32989540 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07985-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopy is nowadays considered as the standard approach for hepatic left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), but its value in the prevention of incisional hernia (IH) has not been demonstrated. METHODS Between 2012 and 2017, patients undergoing laparoscopic (LLLS) or open LLS (OLLS) in 8 centers were compared. Patients undergoing a simultaneous major abdominal procedure were excluded. The incidence of IH was assessed clinically and morphologically on computed tomography (CT) using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS After IPTW, 84 LLLS were compared to 48 OLLS. Compared to OLLS, LLLS patients had reduced blood loss (100 [IQR: 50-200] ml vs. 150 [IQR: 50-415] ml, p = 0.023) and shorter median hospital stay (5 [IQR: 4-7] days vs. 7 [6-9] days, p < 0.001), but experienced similar rate of postoperative complications (mean comprehensive complication index: 12 ± 19 after OLLS versus 13 ± 20 after LLLS, p = 0.968). Long-term radiological screening was performed with a median follow-up of 27.4 (12.1-44.9) months. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of clinically relevant IH (10.7% [n = 9] after LLLS, 8.3% [n = 4] after OLLS, p = 0.768). The rate of IH detected on computed tomography was lower after LLLS than after OLLS (11.9% [n = 10] versus 29.2% [n = 14], p = 0.013). On multivariable analysis, the laparoscopic approach was the only independent factor influencing the risk of morphological IH (OR = 0.290 [95% CI: 0.094-0.891], p = 0.031). The 2 preferential sites for specimen extraction after LLLS were Pfannenstiel and midline incisions, with rates of IH across the extraction site of 2.3% [n = 1/44] and 23.8% [n = 5/21], respectively (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION The laparoscopic approach for LLS decreases the risk of long-term IH as evidenced on morphological examinations, with limited clinical impact. Pfannenstiel's incision should be preferred to midline incision for specimen extraction after LLLS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Darnis
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de La Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317, Lyon Cedex 04, France
| | - Kayvan Mohkam
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de La Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317, Lyon Cedex 04, France. .,Cancer Research Center of Lyon, INSERM 1052/CNRS 5286 Unit, Lyon, France.
| | - Nicolas Golse
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Eric Vibert
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - François Cauchy
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Jean-Marc Regimbeau
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire D'Amiens, Amiens, France
| | - Jeanne Dembinski
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire D'Amiens, Amiens, France
| | - Jean Hardwigsen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Philippe Bachelier
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Christophe Laurent
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Guillaume Millet
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de La Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317, Lyon Cedex 04, France.,Cancer Research Center of Lyon, INSERM 1052/CNRS 5286 Unit, Lyon, France
| | - Emmanuel Boleslawksi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Jean-Yves Mabrut
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital de La Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69317, Lyon Cedex 04, France.,Cancer Research Center of Lyon, INSERM 1052/CNRS 5286 Unit, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Valverde A, Abdallah S, Danoussou D, Goasguen N, Jouvin I, Oberlin O, Lupinacci RM. Transitioning From Open to Robotic Liver Resection. Results of 46 Consecutive Procedures Including a Majority of Major Hepatectomies. Surg Innov 2020; 28:309-315. [PMID: 32857664 DOI: 10.1177/1553350620954580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Aims. Minimally invasive liver resection is a complex and challenging operation. Although authors have reported robotic liver resection shows improved safety and efficacy compared with open liver resection, robotic major liver resections for malignant liver lesions treatment remain inadequately evaluated. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the feasibility and safety of transitioning from open to robotic liver resection in a nonuniversity hospital. Patients and Methods. From December 2015 to March 2020, 46 patients underwent totally robotic-assisted liver resections out of 446 robotic procedures. Also, we retrospectively reviewed the last 27 open right hepatectomies (ORHs) and compared then with the first 25 anatomic robotic-assisted right hepatectomies (RRHs). Results. Mean operative time, mean blood lost, rate of complications, and mean hospital stay were associated with the complexity of the procedure. The comparison between ORH and RRH showed that intraoperative complications were less frequently observed during ORH whereas RRH showed a trend in favor of less blood loss. ORH had a trend toward smaller surgical margins and higher rate of R1 resections. Recurrence occurred in 31 (59%) patients and was more frequently observed after ORH. However, the mean follow-up was significantly shorter after RRH. Conclusion. Our study demonstrated the technical feasibility and safety of transitioning from open to robotic liver resection (including major hepatectomies) in a nonuniversity setting. Higher costs remain an important drawback for robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alain Valverde
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, 158498GH Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | - Solafah Abdallah
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, 158498GH Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | - Divya Danoussou
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, 158498GH Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Goasguen
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, 158498GH Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | - Ingrid Jouvin
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, 158498GH Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Oberlin
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, 158498GH Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France
| | - Renato M Lupinacci
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, 158498GH Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France.,Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Oncologique et Métabolique, Hôpital Ambroise Paré - APHP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.,UFR des Sciences de la Santé Simone Veil, Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines et Université Paris-Saclay, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Li B, Liu T, Zhang Y, Zhang J. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic hepatectomy of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: case report and literature review. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20:278. [PMID: 32819277 PMCID: PMC7439623 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01380-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Almost all liver tumours can be removed laparoscopically, but some difficult tumour locations complicate laparoscopic surgery. Recurrent liver tumours often pose great difficulties to laparoscopic surgery due to adhesions caused by previous operations. Referring to laparoscopic adrenalectomy, a retroperitoneal approach is proposed to remove liver tumours near the adrenal gland, which will provide a new method for liver surgery. CASE PRESENTATION Our case involves a patient with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) whose last operation was laparoscopic hepatectomy in our department, with a recurrence of HCC 2 years after the first surgery. In this case, based on preoperative CT and MRI, through a retroperitoneal approach, combined with intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) localization and indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence navigation, laparoscopic hepatectomy was successfully performed to precisely resect recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in segment VII. The patient was discharged on the third day after the operation. The AFP decreased to normal levels on the 28th postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS Retroperitoneal hepatectomy has the advantages of less trauma, shorter operation times, fewer complications and faster recovery for hepatic tumours near the adrenal gland. Accurate localization of tumours is needed to ensure accurate resection; therefore, IOUS and ICG fluorescence are very important. Liver parenchyma was severed strictly according to fluorescent labelling during hepatectomy, which prevented the deviation of liver parenchyma from the plane and ensured that the margin of hepatectomy was tumour-free. In order to ensure a radical resection of the tumour, it may be necessary to enter the abdominal cavity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baifeng Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Tao Liu
- Department of Urology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yijie Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jialin Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jin S, Tan S, Peng W, Jiang Y, Luo C. Radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:199. [PMID: 32787883 PMCID: PMC7425008 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01966-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared the effects of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the results have remained inconsistent. Hence, a meta-analysis and a systematic review of these treatment modalities are necessary to evaluate their efficacy and safety for HCC treatment. Methods From the inception of this meta-analysis and review until August 31, 2019, we searched Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database for RCTs involving LH and RFA treatments of patients with HCC. The studies were screened and the data from these articles were extracted independently by two authors. Summary odd ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each outcome with a fixed- or random-effect model. The outcomes for effectiveness evaluations included duration of surgery, estimated bleeding volume, incidence of blood transfusion during surgery, duration of hospital stay, and the outcome for safety included the incidence of cancer recurrence. Results Seven RCTs with a total of 615 patients were identified, 312 and 303 of which underwent RFA and LH treatments, respectively. The duration of surgery (MD = −99.04; 95% CI: −131.26–−66.82), estimated bleeding volume (MD = −241.97; 95% CI: −386.93–−97.02), incidence of blood transfusion during surgery (OR = 0.08; 95% CI: 0.02–0.37), and duration of hospital stay (MD = −3.4; 95% CI: −5.22–−1.57) in RFA treatment were significantly lower than those of LH treatment. However, the incidence of cancer recurrence was significantly higher for RFA treatment compared with LH treatment (OR = 2.68; 95% CI: 1.72–4.18). Conclusions LH treatment is preferred over RFA treatment with a better radical effect, but RFA treatment is more beneficial with smaller trauma, development of less complications, and shorter operating time when compared with HCC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan Jin
- Department of oncology, People's Hospital of Guizhou province, Guiyang City, China
| | - Shisheng Tan
- Department of oncology, People's Hospital of Guizhou province, Guiyang City, China
| | - Wen Peng
- Department of oncology, People's Hospital of Guizhou province, Guiyang City, China
| | - Ying Jiang
- Department of oncology, People's Hospital of Guizhou province, Guiyang City, China
| | - Chunshan Luo
- Department of orthopedic, Guizhou Orthopedic Hospital, No. 184, Zhongshan East Road, Nanming District, Guiyang City, 550000, Guizhou Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: comprehensive comparison of complications and costs at 90 days using a propensity method. Updates Surg 2020; 72:1041-1051. [PMID: 32734578 PMCID: PMC7680740 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00854-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (LHH) may offer advantages over open hemihepatectomy (OHH) in blood loss, recovery, and hospital stay. The aim of this study is to evaluate our recent experience performing hemihepatectomy and compare complications and costs up to 90 days following laparoscopic versus open procedures. Retrospective evaluation of patients undergoing hemihepatectomy at our center 01/2010–12/2018 was performed. Patient, tumor, and surgical characteristics; 90-day complications; and costs were analyzed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates. A total of 141 hemihepatectomies were included: 96 OHH and 45 LHH. While operative times were longer for LHH, blood loss and transfusions were less. At 90 days, there were similar rates of liver-specific and surgical complications but fewer medical complications following LHH. Medical complications that arose with greater frequency following OHH were primarily pulmonary complications and urinary and central venous catheter infections. Complications at 90 days were lower following LHH (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ III OHH 23%, LHH 11%, p = 0.130; Comprehensive Complication Index OHH 20.0 ± 16.1, LHH 10.9 ± 14.2, p = 0.001). While operating costs were higher, costs for hospital stay and readmissions were lower with LHH. Patients undergoing LHH experience a significant reduction in postoperative medical complications and costs, resulting in 90-day cost equity compared with OHH.
Collapse
|
28
|
Assis BSD, Coelho FF, Jeismann VB, Kruger JAP, Fonseca GM, Cecconello I, Herman P. Total laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 33:e1494. [PMID: 32428137 PMCID: PMC7236330 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background:
There have been an increasing number of articles that demonstrate the
potential benefits of minimally invasive liver surgery in recent years. Most
of the available evidence, however, comes from retrospective observational
studies susceptible to bias, especially selection bias. In addition, in many
series, several modalities of minimally invasive surgery are included in the
same comparison group. Aim:
To compare the perioperative results (up to 90 days) of patients submitted
to total laparoscopic liver resection with those submitted to open liver
resection, matched by propensity score matching (PSM). Method: Consecutive adult patients submitted to liver resection were included. PSM
model was constructed using the following variables: age, gender, diagnosis
(benign vs. malignant), type of hepatectomy (minor vs. major), and presence
of cirrhosis. After matching, the groups were redefined on a 1:1 ratio, by
the nearest method. Results:
After matching, 120 patients were included in each group. Those undergoing
total laparoscopic surgery had shorter operative time (286.8±133.4 vs.
352.4±141.5 minutes, p<0.001), shorter ICU stay (1.9±1.2 vs. 2.5±2.2days,
p=0.031), shorter hospital stay (5.8±3.9 vs. 9.9±9.3 days, p<0.001) and a
45% reduction in perioperative complications (19.2 vs. 35%, p=0.008). Conclusion:
Total laparoscopic liver resections are safe, feasible and associated with
shorter operative time, shorter ICU and hospital stay, and lower rate of
perioperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Silva de Assis
- Postgraduate Course in Digestive Surgery, Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
- Postgraduate Course in Digestive Surgery, Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Vagner Birk Jeismann
- Postgraduate Course in Digestive Surgery, Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Gilton Marques Fonseca
- Postgraduate Course in Digestive Surgery, Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ivan Cecconello
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Universityof São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Paulo Herman
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Universityof São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Martel G, Baker L, Wherrett C, Fergusson DA, Saidenberg E, Workneh A, Saeed S, Gadbois K, Jee R, McVicar J, Rao P, Thompson C, Wong P, Abou Khalil J, Bertens KA, Balaa FK. Phlebotomy resulting in controlled hypovolaemia to prevent blood loss in major hepatic resections (PRICE-1): a pilot randomized clinical trial for feasibility. Br J Surg 2020; 107:812-823. [PMID: 31965573 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Revised: 09/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major liver resection is associated with blood loss and transfusion. Observational data suggest that hypovolaemic phlebotomy can reduce these risks. This feasibility RCT compared hypovolaemic phlebotomy with the standard of care, to inform a future multicentre trial. METHODS Patients undergoing major liver resections were enrolled between June 2016 and January 2018. Randomization was done during surgery and the surgeons were blinded to the group allocation. For hypovolaemic phlebotomy, 7-10 ml per kg whole blood was removed, without intravenous fluid replacement. Co-primary outcomes were feasibility and estimated blood loss (EBL). RESULTS A total of 62 patients were randomized to hypovolaemic phlebotomy (31) or standard care (31), at a rate of 3·1 patients per month, thus meeting the co-primary feasibility endpoint. The median EBL difference was -111 ml (P = 0·456). Among patients at high risk of transfusion, the median EBL difference was -448 ml (P = 0·069). Secondary feasibility endpoints were met: enrolment, blinding and target phlebotomy (mean(s.d.) 7·6(1·9) ml per kg). Blinded surgeons perceived that parenchymal resection was easier with hypovolaemic phlebotomy than standard care (16 of 31 versus 10 of 31 respectively), and guessed that hypovolaemic phlebotomy was being used with an accuracy of 65 per cent (20 of 31). There was no significant difference in overall complications (10 of 31 versus 15 of 31 patients), major complications or transfusion. Among those at high risk, transfusion was required in two of 15 versus three of nine patients (P = 0·326). CONCLUSION Endpoints were met successfully, but no difference in EBL was found in this feasibility study. A multicentre trial (PRICE-2) powered to identify a difference in perioperative blood transfusion is justified. Registration number: NCT02548910 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Martel
- Liver and Pancreas Unit, Department of Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - L Baker
- Liver and Pancreas Unit, Department of Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - C Wherrett
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - D A Fergusson
- Liver and Pancreas Unit, Department of Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - E Saidenberg
- Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Workneh
- Liver and Pancreas Unit, Department of Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - S Saeed
- Liver and Pancreas Unit, Department of Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - K Gadbois
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - R Jee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - J McVicar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - P Rao
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - C Thompson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - P Wong
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Abou Khalil
- Liver and Pancreas Unit, Department of Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - K A Bertens
- Liver and Pancreas Unit, Department of Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - F K Balaa
- Liver and Pancreas Unit, Department of Surgery, Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Troisi RI, Pegoraro F, Giglio MC, Rompianesi G, Berardi G, Tomassini F, De Simone G, Aprea G, Montalti R, De Palma GD. Robotic approach to the liver: Open surgery in a closed abdomen or laparoscopic surgery with technical constraints? Surg Oncol 2019; 33:239-248. [PMID: 31759794 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The application of the minimally invasive approach has shown to be safe and effective for liver surgery and is in constant growth. The indications for laparoscopic surgery are steadily increasing across the field. In the early 2000s, robotic surgery led to some additional improvements, such as tremor filtration, instrument stability, 3D view and more comfort for the surgeon. These techniques bring in some advantages compared to the traditional OLR: less blood loss, shorter admissions, fewer adhesions, and a faster postoperative recovery and better outcomes in case of further hepatectomy for tumor recurrence has been shown. Concerning which is the best minimally invasive approach between laparoscopic and robotic surgery, the evidence is still conflicting. The latter shows good potential, since the endo-wristed instruments work similarly to the surgeon's hands, even with an intact abdominal wall. However, the technique is still under development, burdened by important costs, and limited by the lack of some instruments available for the laparoscopic approach. The paucity of universally accepted and proven data, especially concerning long-term outcomes, hampers drawing univocal acceptance at present. Furthermore, the number of variables related both to the patient and the disease further complicates the decision leading to a treatment tailored to each patient with strict selection. This review aims to explore the main differences between laparoscopic and robotic surgery, focusing on indications, operative technique and current debated clinical issues in recent literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Interuniversity Center for Technological Innovation Interdepartmental Center for Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Naples, Italy; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine, Belgium.
| | - Francesca Pegoraro
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Interuniversity Center for Technological Innovation Interdepartmental Center for Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Naples, Italy
| | - Mariano Cesare Giglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Interuniversity Center for Technological Innovation Interdepartmental Center for Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Naples, Italy
| | | | - Giammauro Berardi
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine, Belgium
| | - Federico Tomassini
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Faculty of Medicine, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe De Simone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Interuniversity Center for Technological Innovation Interdepartmental Center for Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Aprea
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Interuniversity Center for Technological Innovation Interdepartmental Center for Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Montalti
- Department of Public Health, Federico II University Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Domenico De Palma
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Interuniversity Center for Technological Innovation Interdepartmental Center for Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yoshida H, Taniai N, Yoshioka M, Hirakata A, Kawano Y, Shimizu T, Ueda J, Takata H, Nakamura Y, Mamada Y. Current Status of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy. J NIPPON MED SCH 2019; 86:201-206. [PMID: 31204380 DOI: 10.1272/jnms.jnms.2019_86-411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Before the first laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) was described in 1991, open hepatectomy (OH) was the only choice for surgical treatment of liver tumors. LH indications were initially based solely on tumor location, size, and type. Use of LH has spread rapidly worldwide because it reduces incision size. This review systematically assesses the current status of LH. As compared with OH, LH is significantly less complicated, requires shorter hospital stays, and results in less blood loss. The long-term survival rates of LH and OH are comparable. Development of new techniques and instruments will improve the conversion rate and reduce complications. Furthermore, development of surgical navigation will improve LH safety and efficacy. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy for HCC remains a challenging procedure and should only be performed by experienced surgeons. In the near future, a training system for young surgeons will become mandatory for standardization of LH, and LH will likely become better standardized and have broader applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School
| | - Nobuhiko Taniai
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School
| | - Masato Yoshioka
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School
| | - Atsushi Hirakata
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School
| | - Youichi Kawano
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School
| | - Tetsuya Shimizu
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School
| | - Junji Ueda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School
| | - Hideyuki Takata
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School
| | - Yoshiharu Nakamura
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School
| | - Yasuhiro Mamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Piccolo G, Ratti F, Cipriani F, Catena M, Paganelli M, Aldrighetti L. Totally Laparoscopic Radical Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Cancer: A Single Center Experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019; 29:741-746. [PMID: 31074684 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2019.0227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Primary laparoscopic approach for the treatment of cancers of the biliary tract is not popular in the surgical community. The aim of this study is to report the short-term data of patients who underwent total laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer (GBC) at a single center of specialized hepatobiliary surgery. Methods: From November 2016 to January 2019, we routinely performed a laparoscopic approach for two groups of patients: (1) patients with primary GBC (diagnosed preoperatively) and (2) patients with incidental GBC (IGBC) discovered after cholecystectomy. Results: Our retrospective study included 18 patients (7 primary GBCs, 11 IGBCs). Conversion rate from laparoscopy to laparotomy was 28.6% and 9.1%, respectively, for the two groups, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .28). Only 3 patients had liver recurrence (27.3%) and 1 had liver invasion (14.3%). A more advanced T category and TNM stage were presented in the preoperative suspicion cases (T3-T4 18.2% versus 57.1%, P = .06, stage IVA-B 9.1% versus 71.4%, P = .017). Regional lymphadenectomy was performed in 15 patients, in 73.3% the total number of lymph nodes (total LNs) retrieved was more than 7 (7-12 LNs in 66.7% of patients and >12 LNs in 6.6% of patients). The mean postoperative long stay was 8 days excluding for cases who developed complication. Conclusions: Laparoscopy can be considered a safe treatment for IGBC or primary GBC. The T3 stage with only liver involvement was not a contraindication. The real reasons that lead to convert the laparoscopic procedure were due to oncological concerns, unrelated to the liver infiltration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetano Piccolo
- 1 Department of Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- 2 Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | - Federica Cipriani
- 2 Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | - Marco Catena
- 2 Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | - Michele Paganelli
- 2 Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- 2 Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|