The risk of cancer in patients with connective tissue diseases but without dermatomyositis or polymyositis: A multicenter cohort study conducted over 15 years in China

Malignancy Risk Associated with Mycophenolate Mofetil or Azathioprine in Patients with Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease

Some of these results were presented in abstract form at the 2021 American Thoracic Society International Conference, May 2021.

Malignancy in dermatomyositis: A retrospective paired case-control study of 202 patients from Central China

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy that is closely related to malignant diseases. Our study aims to investigate the incidence and predictive factors for occurrence of malignancy among DM patients from Central China.We performed a retrospective, paired, case-control study of 736 DM patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between 2010 and 2017. We paired the 65 patients with malignancy with age-matched and sex-matched patients without malignancy in a ratio of 1:2. Two hundred two patients were finally enrolled and their clinical and laboratory data were collected.The incidence of malignancy in DM patients was 8.83% (65/736). Most malignancies were detected in the most recent 1 year before (9/65, 13.85%) or within 3 years after (40/65, 61.54%) the onset of DM. Males (35/65, 53.85%) and patients aged between 50 and 69 years (43/65, 66.15%) were prone to develop malignancies. Lung cancer (n = 11, 31.43%) was the most common malignancy in male patients, while for females, thyroid, breast and cervical cancer (n = 4 each, 13.33%) were more prevalent. Adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (both 18/65, 27.69%) were the top two most common pathological types. Univariate analysis demonstrated that Gottron's sign (P = .02), dysphagia (P = .04), albumin (ALB) reduction (P = .003), aspartate aminotransferase (AST, P = .03), creatine kinase-MB (P = .02), absence of fever (P = .02), arthralgia (P = .04) and interstitial lung disease (ILD, P = .05) were closely related to the occurrence of malignancy. Multivariate analysis revealed the independent risk factors of ALB reduction (odds ratio = 1.546, P = .04) and the protective factor of ILD (odds ratio = 0.349, P = .003). There was no significant difference in the follow-up period between patients with and without ILD (P = .38).ALB reduction and the absence of ILD were the risk factors for malignancy in DM patients. The protective mechanism of ILD for DM patients needs further study.

Methodological quality of cohort study on rheumatic diseases in China: A systematic review

Objective

To evaluate systematically the quality of the cohort studies on rheumatic diseases in China.

Methods

Relevant databases were searched to find cohort studies on rheumatic diseases in China, and the basic information included in the literature was extracted and analyzed. Chinese and English literature were then compared with regard to methodological quality, according to the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Results

In total, we included 46 cohort studies, with 19 studies published in English and 27 studies published in Chinese. With regard to the basic characteristics of the literature, 78.26% of the studies were published in the past four years; 16 studies were associated with hyperuricemia, followed by eight studies involving systemic lupus erythematosus. The sample size of the studies in Chinese was lower than that in English studies (P< 0.05). The English literature was superior to the Chinese literature in terms of informed consent, ethical review and selection of statistical analysis methods. The methodology quality of the 46 included studies showed that the English and Chinese NOS scores were 5.59 ± 1.25 and 6.06 ± 1.11, respectively, and the difference was significant (P< 0.01). The “representativeness of the exposed group”, “demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study”, and the “adequacy of follow up of cohorts” scores were relatively low in Chinese and English studies. The score for “was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur” item in English was higher than that in the Chinese studies; however, the “study controls for the most important factor” score for Chinese papers was better than that for the English papers.

Conclusion

The Chinese rheumatic disease cohort studies started late, with a small sample size and fewer types of rheumatism. The quality of Chinese studies was better than English studies, and all reports were insufficient. In particular, “selecting exposed groups”, “controlling the outcomes before study implementation” and “adequacy of follow-up” needed improvement.