Disability and depression after orthopaedic trauma

Can Patient-centered Education and Pain Management Delivered by Coaches Improve Pain Outcomes After Orthopaedic Trauma? A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Pain after orthopaedic trauma is complex, and many patients who have experienced orthopaedic trauma are at increased risk for prolonged opioid utilization after the injury. Patient-centered interventions capable of delivering enhanced education and opioid-sparing pain management approaches must be implemented and evaluated in trauma care settings to improve pain outcomes and minimize opioid-related risks.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Does personalized pain education and management delivered by coaches (1) improve pain-related outcomes, (2) reduce opioid consumption, and (3) improve patient-reported outcome measures (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] scores) compared to written discharge instructions on pain management and opioid safety?

METHODS

This clinical trial aimed to examine the effect of a personalized pain education and management intervention, delivered by paraprofessional coaches, on pain-related outcomes and opioid consumption compared with usual care (written discharge instructions on pain management and opioid safety). Between February 2021 and September 2022, 212 patients were randomized to the intervention (49% [104]) or control group (51% [108]). A total of 31% (32 of 104) and 47% (51 of 108) in those groups, respectively, were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 12 weeks or had incomplete datasets, leaving 69% (72 of 104) and 53% (57 of 108) for analysis in the intervention and control group, respectively. Patients randomized to the intervention worked with the paraprofessional coaches throughout hospitalization after their orthopaedic injury and at their 2-, 6-, and 12-week visits with the surgical team after discharge to implement mindfulness-based practices and nonpharmacological interventions. Most participants in the final sample of 129 identified as Black (73% [94 of 129]) and women (56% [72 of 129]), the mean Injury Severity score was 8 ± 4, and one-third of participants were at medium to high risk for an opioid-use disorder based on the Opioid Risk Tool. Participants completed surveys during hospitalization and at the 2-, 6-, and 12-week follow-up visits. Surveys included average pain intensity scores over the past 24 hours measured on the pain numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 and PROMIS measures (physical functioning, pain interference, sleep disturbance). Opioid utilization, measured as daily morphine milligram equivalents, was collected from the electronic health record, and demographic and clinical characteristics were collected from self-report surveys. Groups were compared in terms of mean pain scores at the 12-week follow-up, daily morphine milligram equivalents both during inpatient and at discharge, and mean PROMIS scores at 12 weeks of follow-up. Additionally, differences in the proportion of participants in each group achieving minimum clinically important differences (MCID) on pain and PROMIS scores were examined. For pain scores, an MCID of 2 points on the pain numeric rating scale assessing past 24-hour pain intensity was utilized.

RESULTS

We found no difference between the intervention and control in terms of mean pain score at 12 weeks nor in the proportions of patients who achieved the MCID of 2 points for 24-hour average pain scores (85% [61 of 72] versus 72% [41 of 57], respectively, OR 2.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9 to 5.3]; p = 0.08). No differences were noted in daily morphine milligram equivalents utilized between the intervention and control groups during hospitalization, at discharge, or in prescription refills. Similarly, we observed no differences in the proportions of patients in the intervention and control groups who achieved the MCID on PROMIS Physical Function (81% [58 of 72] versus 63% [36 of 57], respectively, OR 2.2 [95% CI 0.9 to 5.2]; p = 0.06). We saw no differences in the proportions of patients who achieved the MCID on PROMIS Sleep Disturbance between the intervention and control groups (58% [42 of 72] versus 47% [27 of 57], respectively, OR 1.4 [95% CI 0.7 to 3.0]; p = 0.31). The proportion of patients who achieved the MCID on PROMIS Pain Interference scores did not differ between the intervention and the control groups (39% [28 of 72] versus 37% [21 of 57], respectively, OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.5 to 2.1]; p = 0.95).

CONCLUSION

In this trial, we observed no differences between the intervention and control groups in terms of pain outcomes, opioid medication utilization, or patient-reported outcomes after orthopaedic trauma. However, future targeted research with diverse samples of patients at increased risk for poor postoperative outcomes is warranted to ascertain a potentially meaningful patient perceived effect on pain outcomes after working with coaches. Other investigators interested in this interventional approach may consider the coach program as a framework at their institutions to increase access to evidence-based nonpharmacological interventions among patients who are at increased risk for poor postoperative pain outcomes. Smaller, more focused programs connecting patients to coaches to learn about nonpharmacological pain management interventions may deliver a larger impact on patient's recovery and outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Virtual Reality for Subacute Pain After Orthopedic Traumatic Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

Acute orthopedic traumatic musculoskeletal injuries are prevalent, costly, and often lead to persistent pain and functional limitations. Psychological risk factors (eg, pain catastrophizing and anxiety) exacerbate these outcomes but are often overlooked in acute orthopedic care. Addressing gaps in current treatment approaches, this mixed-methods pilot study explored the use of a therapeutic virtual reality (VR; RelieVRx ), integrating principles of mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral therapy, for pain self-management at home following orthopedic injury.

METHODS

We enrolled 10 adults with acute orthopedic injuries and elevated pain catastrophizing or pain anxiety from Level 1 Trauma Clinics within the Mass General Brigham health care system. Participants completed daily RelieVRx sessions at home for 8 weeks, which included pain education, relaxation, mindfulness, games, and dynamic breathing biofeedback. Primary outcomes were a priori feasibility, appropriateness, acceptability, satisfaction, and safety. Secondary outcomes were pre-post measures of pain, physical function, sleep, depression, and hypothesized mechanisms (pain self-efficacy, mindfulness, and coping).

RESULTS

The VR and study procedures met or exceeded all benchmarks. We observed preliminary improvements in pain, physical functioning, sleep, depression, and mechanisms. Qualitative exit interviews confirmed high satisfaction with RelieVRx and yielded recommendations for promoting VR-based trials with orthopedic patients.

DISCUSSION

The results support a larger randomized clinical trial of RelieVRx versus a sham placebo control to replicate the findings and explore mechanisms. There is potential for self-guided VR to promote evidence-based pain management strategies and address the critical mental health care gap for patients following acute orthopedic injuries.

Cognitive-Behavioral-Based Physical Therapy for Improving Recovery After a Traumatic Lower-Extremity Injury: The Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Lower-extremity injuries can result in severe impairment and substantial years lived with a disability. Persistent pain and psychological distress are risk factors for poor long-term outcomes and negatively influence the recovery process following a traumatic injury. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions have the potential to address these risk factors and subsequently improve outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a telephone-delivered cognitive-behavioral-based physical therapy (CBPT) program on physical function, pain, and general health at 12 months after hospital discharge following lower-extremity trauma. The CBPT program was hypothesized to improve outcomes compared with an education program.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 325 patients who were 18 to 60 years of age and had at least 1 acute orthopaedic injury to the lower extremity or to the pelvis or acetabulum requiring operative fixation. Patients were recruited from 6 Level-I trauma centers and were screened and randomized to the CBPT program or the education program early after hospital discharge. The primary outcome was the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) scale. The secondary outcomes were objective physical function tests (4-square step test, timed stair ascent test, sit-to-stand test, and self-selected walking speed test), PROMIS Pain Intensity and Pain Interference, and the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey. Treatment effects were calculated using targeted maximum likelihood estimation, a robust analytical approach appropriate for causal inference with longitudinal data.

RESULTS

The mean treatment effect on the 12-month baseline change in PROMIS PF was 0.94 (95% confidence interval, -0.68 to 2.64; p = 0.23). There were also no observed differences in secondary outcomes between the intervention group and the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The telephone-delivered CBPT did not appear to yield any benefits for patients with traumatic lower-extremity injuries in terms of physical function, pain intensity, pain interference, or general health. Improvements were observed in both groups, which questions the utility of telephone-delivered cognitive-behavioral strategies over educational programs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Enhancing the Evaluation of Physical Function Following Orthopaedic Trauma Care: Comparison of PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Testing and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment

OBJECTIVES

To compare measurement properties of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) (physical function [PF] and pain interference [PI]) computerized adaptive testing to traditional Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) (dysfunction index [DI] and bother index [BI]). To explore factors associated with PROMIS scores.

METHODS

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Level I Trauma Center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Isolated upper/lower extremity fracture patients were recruited from the orthopaedic trauma outpatient clinic (October 1, 2021 to January 1, 2023).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Correlations (Pearson), reliability (standard error [SE] [T score]), efficiency (amount of information per item [1 - SE2/Nitems]), and floor/ceiling effects were assessed. An r > 0.7 represented high correlation, and SE ≤ 2.2 represented sufficient reliability. Factors associated with worse PROMIS scores were also identified.

RESULTS

In total, 202 patients completed PROMs at median 98 days follow-up. Correlations between PROMIS-PF and SMFA-DI, and PROMIS-PI and SMFA-BI were -0.84 and 0.65. Reliability was very high for both instruments (mean SE 2.0 [PROMIS-PF], SE 2.1 [PROMIS-PI], and SE 1.2 [SMFA-DI], SE 1.8 [SMFA-BI]). Relative efficiency for PROMIS-PF versus SMFA-DI, and PROMIS-PI versus SMFA-BI was 7.8 (SD 2.5) and 4.1 (SD 1.7), respectively. Neither PROMIS nor SMFA exhibited floor/ceiling effects. In the multivariable regression analyses, elevated levels of depression, among other factors, showed an (independent) association with worse PROMIS-PF and PROMIS-PI scores.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMIS-PF and PROMIS-PI CATs showed a (high and moderate) correlation with SMFA and hence measure a comparable construct of physical function and discomfort. As computerized adaptive tests are much more efficient to administer, they present a compelling alternative to SMFA for evaluating impact of fracture treatment. The relation between symptoms of depression and PROMIS scores emphasizes the importance of psychosocial aspects of health in orthopaedic trauma patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prevalence of Depression and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms among Orthopaedic Post-Trauma Patients in Hospital Tuanku Jaafar Seremban (HTJS)

Introduction

Post-trauma patients are at risk of developing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depression. The primary goal of this study is to estimate the prevalence of PTSD and depression symptoms in patients who have been hospitalised for the treatment of physical trauma. Additionally, we wanted to compare the prevalence of PTSD or depression symptoms alone versus PTSD associated with depression symptoms, in orthopaedic post-trauma patients.

Materials and Methods

This study had involved orthopaedic post-trauma patients in the orthopaedic ward and clinic of Hospital Tuanku Jaafar (HTJ), Seremban, Malaysia, using an online questionnaire, which consist of English and Malay language. We then determined the prevalence of depression and PTSD symptoms in orthopaedic post-trauma patients and compared this prevalence to the severity of the injuries sustained and any association between PTSD and depression symptoms.

Results

Only 12.9% of the participants are likely to have post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and 43.3% of participants have depression symptoms. There is no significant association between patient demographics and severity of the injuries with the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression symptoms. However, of those deemed likely to have PTSD, 93.5% of them had both post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms as well as depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

Only a few of the participants are likely to develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) while almost half of the participants are likely to have developed depression. Physicians caring for trauma patients should screen them for early symptoms of PTSD and depression and treat them accordingly.

Deep Surgical Site Infection after Fracture Has a Profound Effect on Functional Outcomes

Background

Fracture-related infection is one of the most challenging complications in orthopaedic trauma surgery. However, the effect of infection on functional and pain-related outcomes has not been well established. The aims of this study were to evaluate functional recovery for patients with fracture and a deep surgical site infection compared with patients with fracture without infection and to evaluate whether pain severity, social support, and preinjury mental health have a moderating effect on the magnitude and direction of the relationship between deep surgical site infection and functional recovery.

Methods

This is a secondary retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data from the VANCO trial (Local Antibiotic Therapy to Reduce Infection After Operative Treatment of Fractures at High Risk of Infection) and the OXYGEN (Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen to Reduce Surgical Site Infection After High Energy Fracture Surgery) trial. In this study, 2,116 patients with tibial plateau, pilon, or calcaneal fractures at high risk for infection were included. Patients were divided into cohorts of patients who experienced a deep surgical site infection and those who did not. The primary outcome measure was the functional outcome using the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12).

Results

After controlling for covariates, deep surgical site infection was independently associated with functional outcome, with a 3.3-point reduction in the VR-12 Physical Component Score, and pain severity was independently associated with functional outcome, with a 2.5-point reduction in the VR-12 Physical Component Score. Furthermore, the Brief Pain Inventory pain severity demonstrated an important moderating effect on the relationship between infection and functional outcome. In patients with lower pain scores, infection had a large negative impact on functional outcome, whereas, in patients with higher pain scores, infection had no significant impact on functional outcome. Furthermore, the functional outcome in the entire cohort remains at only 61% of baseline.

Conclusions

This study documents the negative impact of postoperative infection on functional recovery after injury, as well as the novel finding of pain severity as an important moderating factor. This study emphasizes not only the importance of developing effective interventions designed to reduce postoperative infection, but also the role that factors that moderate pain severity plays in limiting recovery of physical function.

Level of evidence

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Influence of Pain Sensitivity on Surgical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) has been found to be a valid tool, and PSQ scores have been shown to be predictive of outcomes after surgery for lumbar stenosis. The effect of pain sensitivity on outcomes of rotator cuff repair (RCR) surgery has not been examined.

HYPOTHESIS

PSQ scores would be associated with surgical outcomes after arthroscopic RCR surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Patients 18 to 80 years old scheduled for RCR were consecutively enrolled. Patients with glenohumeral arthritis grade ≥2 or RCR revision surgery were excluded. PSQ was completed preoperatively. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score were used as patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), and visual analog scale pain score was documented as well. Active shoulder external rotation (ER), internal rotation, and anterior forward elevation range of motion (ROM) were recorded. PROMs and ROM measurements were recorded preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Rotator cuff tear size, type of repair, and concomitant procedures were documented. Patients were classified as having high or normal pain sensitivity based on PSQ scores.

RESULTS

Of 100 enrolled patients, 38 patients were classified as having high pain sensitivity. Patients with high pain sensitivity had worse American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and 1 year postoperatively (P < .01). From the preoperative assessment to 3 months postoperatively, PROMs improved more in patients with high versus normal pain sensitivity. However, for patients with high pain sensitivity, PROMs plateaued after 3 months but continued to improve for patients with normal pain sensitivity (P < .01). Visual analog scale pain scores were higher at all time points for patients with high pain sensitivity (P < .05). Preoperatively, patients with high pain sensitivity had restricted active ROM compared with patients who had normal pain sensitivity for anterior forward elevation, ER, and internal rotation (P = .009, P = .012, and P = .006, respectively). By 1 year after surgery, ER ROM was still restricted in patients with high pain sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Pain sensitivity is an important factor influencing RCR outcomes. Patients with high pain sensitivity undergoing RCR showed less improvement in active ROM and worse PROMs after surgery compared with patients who had normal pain sensitivity. Preoperative PSQ may predict postoperative improvements.

A systematic review of biopsychosocial prognostic factors of recovery after a proximal humerus fracture

BACKGROUND

Proximal humerus fracture (PHF) is a common upper extremity injury. PHF often causes prolonged disability and interferes with independent function.

PURPOSE

This study reviewed and summarized prognostic factors of recovery following PHF and classified them within the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) with each domain sub-categorized by modifiability.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsychINFO from the date of database inception to March 2019 and updated searches in December 2021. Studies included examining an association between prognostic factors and recovery with at least a 6-month follow-up. Two independent reviewers used the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool for methodological bias and levels of evidence. Designs showed wide variability in terms of characteristics of the included population, definition of recovery, assessment of prognostic factors, and outcome measures used. This prevented pooled estimates from being produced. Prognostic factors linked to ICF domains were possible.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies including 4323 participants aged ≥18 met inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was low (35%), moderate (30%), and high (35%) across the included studies. Moderate evidence showed a significant association between pre-fracture functional independence and post-fracture complications with recovery. Fracture type, structural deformity, medication use, age, and gender were prognostic factors with inconclusive evidence. We assigned a weak level of evidence to the remaining 20 factors due to limited data. Immediate rehabilitation, compliance to post-fracture rehabilitation exercise, task-oriented exercise, and pain self-efficacy (i.e., coping behavior) are modifiable and are tapped into the ICF contextual factors.

CONCLUSIONS

An array of factors that fit within an ICF biopsychosocial framework have been investigated as potential mediators of outcomes after PHF. The evidence is incomplete conceptually and in terms of research design quality. Preoperative functional status is predictive of functional recovery emphasizing the importance of healthy aging.

Illicit drug and alcohol use and measures of musculoskeletal function and mental health in orthopaedic trauma patients

Objectives

The objective of this study was to describe the relationship between positive toxicology screens and measures of preinjury mental health and physical function in an orthopaedic trauma population.

Design

This was a cross-sectional study.

Setting

Urban Level 1 trauma center.

Patients

A total of 125 trauma patients gave written consent for this study.

Main Outcome Measurements

Questionnaires such as, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, General Anxiety Disorder-7, PCL-5, and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment, were used to survey patients after surgical intervention.

Results

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (P = 0.05) and PCL-5 (P = 0.04) were not found to have significant differences between positive and negative toxicology screens. Both General Anxiety Disorder-7 (P = 0.004) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment function (P = 0.006) were significantly higher in patients with positive toxicology screens.

Conclusions

Positive toxicology seems to be associated with preinjury anxiety. Patient reported preinjury function was not adversely affected by the presence of illicit substances or alcohol, nor were levels of post-traumatic stress disorder and depression found to be higher in patients with positive toxicology screens.

Level of Evidence

Level IV Cross-Sectional Study.

Patient-reported Anxiety Scores Are Associated With Lower Physical Function in Patients Experiencing Orthopaedic Trauma

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of orthopaedic trauma are not solely determined by injury severity or surgical treatment. Studies of numerous orthopaedic outcomes have found that psychosocial factors are also important. Symptoms of anxiety have been linked to long-term pain and disability. Although the existence of a relationship between psychosocial factors and functional outcomes is accepted across multiple disciplines, quantification of this association in patients who have experienced orthopaedic trauma has remained limited. Measuring the anxiety experienced by these individuals and the association with long-term functional outcomes remain poorly understood.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is there an association between early postoperative anxiety symptoms and late recovery of self-reported physical function in patients with orthopaedic trauma? (2) What was the impact of other factors such as demographic variables and comorbidities on late recovery physical function scores, and how did the magnitude of these factors compare with the association with anxiety score? (3) Did patients who presented as trauma activations differ regarding their anxiety symptoms and late-recovery self-reported physical function?

METHODS

A total of 1550 patients with lower extremity fractures and postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) anxiety and physical function scores treated between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2021, at an academic Level I trauma center in North America were assessed. We performed a bivariate regression between the initial PROMIS anxiety and physical function, as well as a multivariate regression including age, gender, BMI, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class to control for potential confounding variables. In a subgroup of 787 patients presenting as trauma activations, we performed a separate regression including Injury Severity Score.

RESULTS

PROMIS anxiety was associated with decreased late-recovery physical function (β = -2.64 [95% CI -3.006 to -2.205]; p < 0.001). The relationship between PROMIS anxiety and physical function remained after controlling for confounding variables in our overall cohort (β = -2.54 [95% CI -2.93 to -2.15]; p < 0.001) and in the trauma activation cohort (β = -2.71 [95% CI -3.19 to -2.23]; p < 0.001). Age and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were associated with worse PROMIS physical function scores, while being a man was associated with better PROMIS physical function scores (age: β= -1.26 [95% CI -1.50 to -1.02]; American Society of Anesthesiologists class: β=-2.99 [95% CI -3.52 to -2.46]; men: β = 0.95 [95% CI 0.16 to 1.75]). There were no differences in initial anxiety symptoms or late-recovery physical function between patients who presented as trauma activations and those who did not. Injury Severity Scores were independently associated with worse function (β = -1.45 [95% CI -2.11 to -0.79].

CONCLUSION

Initial patient self-reported anxiety is negatively associated with patient-reported physical function at the final follow-up interval in a broad cohort of patients with orthopaedic lower extremity injuries undergoing surgery. Identifying patients with high initial PROMIS anxiety scores may allow us to determine which patients will report lower functional scores at the final follow-up. Future investigations could focus on the effect of psychosocial interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness on functional scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Prediction of disability in trigger finger: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

The aim of this prospective study of 55 patients was to analyse the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationship between disability and physical and psychological variables after conservative treatment of trigger finger and to determine the predictive factors for the post-treatment disability score and change in disability score. The primary outcome measure was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Potential predictive factors included pain, number of triggering events, depression, anxiety and kinesiophobia. Disability correlated strongly with anxiety, moderately with pain and depression and weakly with triggering and kinesiophobia. The change in depression score correlated significantly with the change in disability score. Post-treatment pain and anxiety scores accounted for 47% of the explained variance in disability score. Improvement in depression after treatment accounted for 18% of the explained variance in disability change score. Psychological variables appear to be potential predictors of disability.Level of evidence: IV.

The Association Between Depression and Antidepressant Use and Outcomes After Operative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures at 1 Year

PURPOSE

Depression has been linked to inferior clinical outcomes among upper extremity patients. It often is challenging to distinguish the symptoms of depression, symptoms of injury, and the interaction between these 2 entities after a patient has been injured. We aimed to study the differences in clinical outcomes after surgical fixation of distal radius fractures between patients with and without a documented history and treatment for depression.

METHODS

All subjects with an isolated, acute distal radius fracture undergoing operative fixation in a 10-year period at a level 1 academic trauma center were screened. Baseline demographic data were collected, and psychiatric history and antidepressant use were recorded and verified with a pharmacy database. Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), range of motion, and grip strength were assessed at 12 months after surgery. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to assess the association of depression with QuickDASH scores at 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients were available for 1-year follow-up, 50 of whom were being treated actively for depression with medication at the time of injury and 161 were without a known diagnosis of, or treatment for, depression. Demographic and injury characteristics were similar between both groups. In a multivariable linear regression model controlling for age, sex, and a history of osteoporosis, active treatment for depression was associated with a slight mean increase in QuickDASH scores, 6.5 (1.3-11.8), 1 year after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a small increase in QuickDASH scores between subjects with a confirmed diagnoses of depression compared with all others after surgical fixation of distal radius fracture at 1-year follow-up. We suggest that a history of depression may portend worse clinical outcomes, although other factors, such as underreporting of depression may influence results.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Concurrent Mental Illness and Financial Barriers to Mental Health Care Among a Nationally Representative Sample of Orthopaedic Trauma Survivors

OBJECTIVES

To understand prevalence and factors associated with concurrent mental illness and financial barriers to mental health care after orthopaedic trauma.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Interview-based survey was conducted across representative sample of 30,000 US households.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

The study included 2,309 survey respondents reporting a fracture over the past 3 months, between 2004 and 2017.

INTERVENTION

Screening for financial barriers to mental health care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Prevalence and factors associated with concurrent mental illness and financial barriers to mental health care based on sociodemographic and injury characteristics were the main outcome measurements.

RESULTS

Of the 2309 orthopaedic trauma survivors included in our analysis, 203 patients [7.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.4%-9.2%] were determined to experience severe mental illness, of whom 54 (25.3%, 95% CI: 18.0%-32.6%) and 86 (40.9%, 95% CI: 31.5%-50.2%) reported financial barriers to counseling and pharmacotherapy, respectively. Factors associated with concurrent severe mental illness and cost barriers to care were 45 to 64 years of age [adjusted odds ratios (AOR) 5.1, 95% CI: 1.7-15, P = 0.004], income below 200% of the Federal Poverty Threshold (AOR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.2-5.3, P = 0.012), and unemployment at the time of injury (AOR 3.9, 95% CI: 1.4-11, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one half of orthopaedic trauma survivors with severe mental illness face financial barriers to some form of mental health services. Younger, minority, and low socioeconomic status patients are most affected. These data suggest the presence of postdiagnosis disparities in mental health access that may be improved through direct provision and subsidization of integrated mental health support services for high-risk populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patient Mental Health and Well-being: Its Impact on Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes

A patient's mental health can have a significant impact on their orthopaedic trauma outcome. It is important for orthopaedic surgeons to identify patients at risk for a poor outcome based on their mental health, to include the presence of post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety, among others. Although some behaviors such as catastrophizing have been associated with worse outcomes, others, such as possessing greater self-efficacy have been associated with improved outcomes. Because of the high prevalence of mental health conditions that can have a detrimental effect on outcome, screening should be routinely conducted and at-risk patients referred to appropriate resources in an effort to optimize outcomes.

Resources for Patient Mental Health and Well-being after Orthopaedic Trauma

Orthopaedic trauma is an unanticipated life-altering experience for patients. Additionally, the prevalence of psychiatric disorders has been found to be higher in patients with trauma than in the general adult population. Symptoms of depression, anxiety, or posttraumatic stress disorder have been reported in up to 56% of patients throughout their postoperative course. Furthermore, symptoms of any one of these illnesses have been consistently associated with worse patient outcomes after treatment of traumatic orthopaedic injuries. This includes increased levels of pain and disability, postoperative complications, and, in some cases, higher rates of hospital readmission. For most patients with trauma, focus is placed on physical therapy and rehabilitation in the acute postoperative setting to help patients regain function and strength; however, more recent studies have demonstrated equal importance of the social and psychological factors involved with trauma and their impact on outcomes. Therefore, it is essential for orthopaedic surgeons and other members of the care team to be adept in the screening and treatment of psychiatric disorders. For patients struggling with these conditions, several treatment resources exist, which can be used both during their admission and after discharge. Thus, earlier recognition and intervention with appropriate treatment and referrals should be emphasized to improve outcomes. This review discusses the social and psychological impacts of orthopaedic trauma on patients' mental health and well-being and outlines numerous resources available to patients as they recover from their injuries.

Depression Screening and Behavioral Health Integration in Musculoskeletal Trauma Care

OBJECTIVES

To report our experiences in implementing a behavioral health integration pathway, including a validated depression screening and referral to care.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Single surgeon's musculoskeletal trauma outpatient practice during calendar year 2019.

PATIENTS

All patients presenting to the practice during 2019 were included (n = 573).

INTERVENTION

We piloted the usage of Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2 and PHQ-9 screening. An evidence-based, real-time treatment protocol embedded in the electronic health record was triggered when a patient screened positive for depression including an automated behavioral health integration pathway.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The percentage of patients screened, the results of the PHQ screening, and the number of patients referred and enrolled in behavioral health programs were collected.

RESULTS

Of the 573 patients, 476 (83%) received the PHQ-2 screening, 80 (14%) had a current screening on file (within 1 year), and 17 (3.0%) were not screened. One hundred seventy-two patients (36%) had a PHQ-2 score of 2 or greater and completed the PHQ-9; of them, 60 (35% of patients screened with full PHQ-9, 13% of patients screened) screened positive for symptoms of moderate depression (PHQ-9 score ≥10), and 19 (4.0%) reported passive suicidal ideation (PHQ-9 item 9). Fifty of these patients were referred to behavioral health through the pathway, and 8 patients enrolled in the program. Ten patients were not referred because of a technical error that was quickly resolved. Patients reporting suicidal ideation were managed with psychiatric crisis resources including immediate virtual consult in the examination room.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series demonstrates the feasibility of screening patients for depressive symptoms and making necessary referrals to behavioral health in outpatient musculoskeletal trauma care. We identified 50 patients with depression and appropriately triaged them for further care in our community.

Short-term Disability Insurance, Return to Work, and the Responsibility of the Orthopaedic Surgeon

Millions of Americans are unable to work every day because of illness or injury. Many of these individuals have musculoskeletal issues and are under the care of an orthopaedic surgeon. Short-term disability insurance programs have been developed to address the financial burden experienced by workers who are temporarily without income. Private insurance companies and state-sponsored programs are the two most common forms. Most disability plans require verification from a physician that the worker is unable to work or is able to work in a limited capacity. Quite often, this responsibility falls on the orthopaedic surgeon. Our participation is important and substantial, yet we receive little instruction on the role that we play in this process. This article explains the history and development of short-term disability programs, describes the way they currently function in our country, and clarifies the role of the orthopaedic surgeon in the process.

The impact of major occupational injuries on professional reintegration. A Portuguese medico-legal contribution

Occupational injuries represent an enormous economic impact for victims, respective families, involved institutions and all the community due to professional outcomes. Thus, it is of the utmost importance that medico-legal personal injury assessment and the posterior follow-up of these victims, may allow their concrete damage repair, considering the victims' needs fulfilment and professional reintegration, whenever possible. The main objective of this study is to reflect on the role that legal medicine can play in promoting the professional reintegration of victims of major occupational accidents through the analysis of occupational injuries cases considering the medico-legal examinations performed. A retrospective study was conducted using medico-legal major occupational injuries cases (Partial Permanent Disability ≥40%). Data were collected from two medico-legal assessment moments: (a) personal injury assessment homologated by a labour court 4.8 years on average after occupational injury; (b) medico-legal follow-up for needs and/or Partial Permanent Disability adjustments performed 18.9 years on average after occupational injury. The final sample includes 103 cases. The results showed that in major occupational accidents, permanent long-term outcomes were principally associated with neurological (62.1%) and orthopaedic (52.4%) sequelae. Permanent professional damage parameters assigned by the labour court included Partial Permanent Disability (23.3%), Permanent Absolute Disability for Regular Work (41.7%) and Permanent Absolute Disability for Any Work (35%). Three-dimensional methodology is helpful in predicting Partial Permanent Disability and Permanent Absolute Disability for Any Work. However, three-dimensional methodology did not reveal correlations with Permanent Absolute Disability for Regular Work, and currently 65% of the victims who were considered able to work by the labour court are not professionally active. Thus, these major cases deserve a more detailed medico-legal approach based on concrete information about the professional reality of each victim, especially cases with an eventual Permanent Absolute Disability for Regular Work. Medico-legal Injury Assessment must be based on concrete aspects of the victim's professional reality and not only on permanent disability tables. This calls for an articulation between all institutions working with the victim of occupational injuries and legal medicine to promote recovery and the necessary measures to assure professional rehabilitation.

There are more things in physical function and pain: a systematic review on physical, mental and social health within the orthopedic fracture population using PROMIS

Background

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS®) is more and more extensively being used in medical literature in patients with an orthopedic fracture. Yet, many articles studied heterogeneous groups with chronic orthopedic disorders in which fracture patients were included as well. At this moment, there is no systematic overview of the exact use of PROMIS measures in the orthopedic fracture population. Therefore this review aimed to provide an overview of the PROMIS health domains physical health, mental health and social health in patients suffering an orthopedic fracture.

Methods

This systematic review was documented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Central Register of controlled Trials, CINAHL and Google Scholar in December 2020 using a combination of MeSH terms and specific index terms related to orthopedic fractures and PROMIS questionnaires. Inclusion criteria were available full text articles that were describing the use of any PROMIS questionnaires in both the adult and pediatric extremity fracture population.

Results

We included 51 relevant articles of which most were observational studies (n = 47, 92.2%). A single fracture population was included in 47 studies of which 9 involved ankle fractures (9/51; 17.6%), followed by humeral fractures (8/51; 15.7%), tibia fractures (6/51; 11.8%) and radial -or ulnar fractures (5/51; 9.8%). PROMIS Physical Function (n = 32, 32/51 = 62.7%) and PROMIS Pain Interference (n = 21, 21/51 = 41.2%) were most frequently used questionnaires. PROMIS measures concerning social (n = 5/51 = 9.8%) and mental health (10/51 = 19.6%) were much less often used as outcome measures in the fracture population. A gradually increasing use of PROMIS questionnaires in the orthopedic fracture population was seen since 2017.

Conclusion

Many different PROMIS measures on multiple domains are available and used in previous articles with orthopedic fracture patients. With physical function and pain interference as most popular PROMIS measures, it is important to emphasize that other health-domains such as mental and social health can also be essential to fracture patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00440-3.

Diagnostik und Therapie aus der Patientenperspektive - PROMs in der Chirurgie

Die zunehmend an Bedeutung gewinnenden Patient reported Outcome and Experience Measures (PROMs/PREMs) können in allen chirurgischen Disziplinen zusätzlich zu den klassischen harten Endpunkten wie z. B. Überlebenskurven und Implantatestandzeiten wichtige Informationen zu Qualitätsindikatoren oder Entscheidungshilfen zu konkurrierenden Therapieverfahren liefern. Dies gilt ebenso für die Evaluation neuer Therapiekonzepte wie für Vergleiche klassisch offener Zugangswege und minimalinvasiver bzw. endoskopischer Verfahren z. B. im Hinblick auf geringere Zugangsmorbidität und schnellere Rehabilitation vs. höherem Komplikationsrisiko, aber auch der Risiko-Nutzen-Bewertung der Verlängerung der Lebenszeit einerseits auf Kosten einer Beeinträchtigung der Lebensqualität andererseits.

Diesem Zusatznutzen steht ein notwendiger Ressourceneinsatz (Personal- und Sachkosten für Postversand oder für eine Onlineerhebung in Form von Entwicklungs-, Bereitstellungs- oder Lizenz- und Servicekosten) gegenüber, der sich nur bedingt beeinflussen lässt (z. B. Portokosten für eine Vollerhebung vs. repräsentative Stichprobe). Die zentrale Voraussetzung für den erfolgreichen Einsatz von PROMs und PREMs ist jedoch, dass geeignete, sprachlich und inhaltlich validierte Erhebungsinstrumente verfügbar sind oder durch einen Validierungsprozess zur Verfügung gestellt werden können.

Für den Einsatz von PROMs bei konkurrierenden Therapieansätzen findet sich bereits eine Reihe von Beispielen, die wertvolle Unterstützung bieten und sich im Klinikalltag etabliert haben. So können sie bei belastenden Therapieansätze in der chirurgischen Tumortherapie bei Entscheidungen über ein verbessertes Überleben bei starker Belastung vs. dem Erhalt oder sogar Zugewinn an Lebensqualität unterstützen. In der onkologischen Mammachirurgie steht die Lebensqualität bei brusterhaltendem Vorgehen häufig der Überlebenszeit bezogen auf das TU-Stadium bei Ablation gegenüber. Ebenso gilt es bei Prostatakarzinompatienten, immer wieder zwischen invasiver Therapie und Verlaufsbeobachtung (Überleben vs. Inkontinenz und Potenzstörungen) zu entscheiden. In der Orthopädie/Unfallchirurgie gibt es bei einer Reihe von Eingriffen häufig eine Alternative, z. B. Sprunggelenkendoprothesen vs. Arthrodesen oder inverse Schulterprothesen vs. Osteosynthese bei schultergelenknahen Humerusfrakturen.

Aber auch bei der Evaluation neuer Therapiekonzepte (z. B. der subjektive Aspekt einer früheren Wiedererlangung der Selbstständigkeit durch Einführung neuer Nachbehandlungskonzepte/sog. Fast-Track-Reha) sind PROMs und PREMS wichtige Werkzeuge.

All body region injuries are not equal: Differences in pediatric discharge functional status based on Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) body regions and severity scores

PURPOSE

Functional outcomes have been proposed for assessing quality of pediatric trauma care. Outcomes assessments often rely on Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) severity scores to adjust for injury characteristics, but the relationship between AIS severity and functional impairment is unknown. This study's primary aim was to quantify functional impairment associated with increasing AIS severity scores within body regions. The secondary aim was to assess differences in impairment between body regions based on AIS severity.

METHODS

Children with serious (AIS≥ 3) isolated body region injuries enrolled in a multicenter prospective study were analyzed. The primary outcome was functional status at discharge measured using the Functional Status Scale (FSS). Discharge FSS was compared (1) within each body region across increasing AIS severity scores, and (2) between body regions for injuries with matching AIS scores.

RESULTS

The study included 266 children, with 16% having abnormal FSS at discharge. Worse FSS was associated with increasing AIS severity only for spine injuries. Abnormal FSS was observed in a greater proportion of head injury patients with a severely impaired initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (GCS< 9) compared to those with a higher GCS score (43% versus 9%; p < 0.01). Patients with AIS 3 extremity and severe head injuries had a higher proportion of abnormal FSS at discharge than AIS 3 abdomen or non-severe head injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

AIS severity does not account for variability in discharge functional impairment within or between body regions. Benchmarking based on functional status assessment requires clinical factors in addition to AIS severity for appropriate risk adjustment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 (Prognostic and Epidemiological).

Priorities for Advancing Mental and Social Health Among People Presenting for Care of Musculoskeletal Symptoms : International Consortium for Mental and Social Health in Musculoskeletal Care

An international group of clinicians and researchers formed a consortium to advance mental and social health among people seeking musculoskeletal specialty care: The International Consortium for Mental and Social Health in Musculoskeletal Care (I-MESH). As a first step to organize the work of the consortium, we sought to identify important, appropriate, and feasible interventions to address mental and social health. Members of I-MESH responded to a list of 10 queries intended to elicit mental and social health priorities. Open text answers were analyzed by 2 researchers to elicit individual themes. A modified RAND/UCLA Delphi Appropriateness process was conducted of 32 candidate social and mental health priorities using a 15-person panel of I-MESH members, using 2 rounds of independent voting with intervening discussion via surveys and video teleconferences. Panelists rated each potential priority for importance, feasibility, and appropriateness on a 9-point Likert scale. Top level priorities scored both mean and median greater than 7 in all 3 categories. Second level priorities scored a median 7 or greater on the final scoring in all 3 categories. Candidate priorities were organized into 9 themes: viable business model, coordination of specialty and non-specialty care, actionable measurement, public health/cultural interventions, research, adequate and timely access, incorporating assessment in care, strategies to develop the patient-clinician relationship, communication strategies that can directly enhance health, and support for mental and social health. Twelve top level (met mean and median criteria) and 17 s level priorities (met median criterion) were identified. Implementing evidence-based strategies to efficiently diagnose, prioritize, and begin addressing mental and social health opportunities has the potential for notable impact on both musculoskeletal and overall health. It is our hope that the results of this Delphi panel will generate enthusiasm and collaboration for implementing the mounting evidence that social and mental health are integral to musculoskeletal health.

The Association Between Psychological Factors and Outcomes After Distal Radius Fracture

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify psychological factors associated with pain intensity and disability following distal radius fracture.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 216 adult patients with distal radius fracture for 9 months. Demographics, injury and treatment details, and psychological measures (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score [HADS], Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Illness Perception Questionnaire Brief [IPQB], General Self-Efficacy Scale, and Recovery Locus of Control [RLOC]) were collected at enrollment. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors associated with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and Likert pain scores.

RESULTS

Higher 10-week DASH scores were associated with increased age, the presence of a nerve pathology, increased HADS Depression subscale scores, increased IPQB scores, and lower RLOC scores. Higher 9-month DASH scores were associated with increased age, increased deprivation scores, increased numbers of medical comorbidities, a greater degree of radial shortening, increased HADS Depression subscale scores, and lower RLOC scores. A higher 10-week pain score was associated with increased deprivation and IPQB scores. A higher pain score at 9 months was associated with an increased number of medical comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychosocial factors measured early after fracture are associated with pain and disability up to 9 months after distal radius fracture. Illness perception is a potentially modifiable psychological construct not previously studied in hand conditions. It may provide a suitable target for psychological interventions that could enhance recovery.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Minimum 2-year outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fracture: how does acute arthroplasty compare with salvage?

BACKGROUND

The objective of our study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures, range of motion (ROM), complication rates, and reoperation rates after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for proximal humeral fractures between patients treated acutely (≤30 days after injury), those treated after initial nonoperative treatment (>30 days after injury), and those treated after failed open reduction-internal fixation. Secondarily, we aimed to identify any patient-, injury-, or surgery-related factors independently associated with our response variables.

METHODS

We identified 576 patients who sustained a proximal humeral fracture treated with primary or revision shoulder arthroplasty between January 2003 and August 2018. The final cohort included 153 patients. Multivariable analysis was used to assess whether explanatory variables were associated with our response variables.

RESULTS

Initial nonoperative treatment compared with acute rTSA was associated with worse Shoulder Subjective Value (P = .04), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score (P = .03), and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index disability subscale score (P = .03). Only depression was independently associated with worse visual analog scale pain score (P = .04). There was no significant difference in postoperative ROM between the initial treatment groups. Older age was associated with decreased ROM in all planes. Additionally, ipsilateral upper-extremity injury was associated with decreased active abduction (P = .03), and cemented humeral stems were associated with decreased passive abduction (P = .03). Initial nonoperative treatment was associated with increased complication rates (odds ratio, 3.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-12.01), and male sex was associated with higher rates of reoperation (odds ratio, 3.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-9.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo initial periods of nonoperative management have worse functional outcomes and higher complication rates than those who undergo acute rTSA for proximal humeral fractures. Patients who undergo rTSA after failed open reduction-internal fixation show no difference in patient-reported outcomes compared with those who undergo acute rTSA. In addition, male patients are at higher risk of reoperation, whereas older patients are at risk of decreased ROM. Patients with preoperative depression are at risk of increased pain at 2 years after surgery.

Prevalence of depression and anxiety and associated factors among geriatric orthopedic trauma inpatients: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Common mental disorders such as anxiety and depression in geriatric orthopedic trauma patients have received little attention in research.

AIM

To investigate the prevalence of emotional disorders among geriatric orthopedic trauma patients and identify demographic, social and clinical risk factors.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was performed in geriatric patients (aged ≥ 60 years, both sexes) with orthopedic trauma admitted to a level I trauma center between May 2015 and December 2017. Demographic, social, and clinical characteristics were described. Huaxi Emotional-Distress Index (HEI) was used to evaluate the severity of anxiety and depression status. Differences in continuous variables were tested using the t-test, and differences in categorical variables were assessed using the Pearson χ² test. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify the factors associated with a HEI score > 8.

RESULTS

Among the 966 patients, 487 were male and 479 were female, with a mean age of 70.2 ± 7.1 years. The age ranged from 60 to 90 years. Seventy-five patients had an HEI score > 8, accounting for about 7.8% of all patients. A higher Injury Severity Score (4.17 ± 3.10 vs 7.96 ± 6.68, P < 0.001), higher Visual Analog Score (5.05 ± 1.09 vs 6.89 ±1.23, P < 0.001), number of chronic diseases (P < 0.001), injury type (P = 0.038), and education level (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with HEI score > 8. On logistic regression, a higher education level was a protective factor for emotional disorders (P = 0.047), whereas Injury Severity Score (P = 0.024), Visual Analog Score (P < 0.001), two or more chronic diseases (P < 0.001) were the related independent risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Emotional disorders are common in geriatric patients with orthopedic trauma. Clinicians should remain vigilant of emotional disorders in geriatric patients and screen for anxiety and depression in higher risk groups.

Functional Outcome After Nonoperative Treatment of a Proximal Humeral Fracture in Adults

BACKGROUND

The functional outcome following nonoperative treatment of a proximal humeral fracture and the factors that influence it are poorly defined. We aimed to prospectively assess patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a patient cohort at 1 year after the injury.

METHODS

In this study, 774 adult patients sustaining a proximal humeral fracture completed PROM assessments, including the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), and visual analog scale (VAS) assessments of pain, health, and overall treatment satisfaction at 1 year. The mean patient age was 65.6 years, and 73.8% of patients were female. The influences of demographic and fracture measurements and complications on the OSS and EQ-5D-3L were assessed.

RESULTS

The 1-year mean scores were 33.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.1 to 34.2 points) for the OSS and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.61) for the EQ-5D-3L. There was considerable heterogeneity in the reported scores, and the 3 demographic variables of higher levels of dependency, higher levels of social deprivation, and a history of affective (mood) disorder were most consistently associated with poorer outcomes, accounting for between 37% and 43% of the score variation. The initial fracture translation potentially leading to nonunion accounted for 9% to 15% of the variation, and a displaced tuberosity fracture was also predictive of 1% to 4% of the outcome variation. There was evidence of a ceiling effect for the OSS, with 238 patients (30.8%) having a score of ≥47 points but a mean outcome satisfaction of only 72.9 points, and this effect was more pronounced in younger, active individuals. At the other end of the spectrum, 239 patients (30.9%) reported an OSS of ≤24 points, and 120 patients (15.5%) had a "worse-than-death" EQ-5D-3L score.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures produces considerable variation in shoulder-specific and general health outcomes at 1 year, and a substantial proportion of patients have poor perceived functional outcomes. The outcome for the majority of less-displaced fractures is mainly influenced by preexisting patient-related psychosocial factors, although the fracture-related factors of displacement, nonunion, and tuberosity displacement account for a small but measurable proportion of the variation and the poorer outcomes in the minority with more severe injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical outcomes following major trauma for patients with a diagnosis of depression: a large UK database analysis

Background

More than a quarter of the UK population are affected by depression during their lifetime. For major trauma patients, postinjury depression can result in poorer long-term outcomes, but there is limited evidence regarding outcomes for patients with pre-existing depression. This study investigated the relationship between a diagnosis of depression prior to hospital admission and clinical outcomes after major trauma.

Methods

Trauma patients at a UK major trauma center were identified during a 6.5-year period using the Trauma Audit and Research Network database. Patients with Injury Severity Score >15 who did not die in the emergency department (ED) were included. Logistic regression models were used to compare in-hospital mortality (excluding ED), requirement for surgery, and length of stay (LOS) between those with depression and those without.

Results

There were 4602 patients included in the study and 6.45% had a diagnosis of depression. Depression was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.91; p=0.026). However, patients with depression were more likely to have longer LOS (OR 124, 95% CI 8.5 to 1831; p<0.001) and intensive care unit LOS (OR 9.69, 95% CI 3.14 to 29.9; p<0.001). Patients with depression were also more likely to undergo surgery (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.75; p=0.016).

Discussion

A pre-existing diagnosis of depression has complex association with clinical outcomes after major trauma, with reduced mortality but longer LOS and higher likelihood of surgical intervention. Further prospective investigations are warranted to inform optimal management strategies for major trauma patients with pre-existing depression.

Level of evidence

III.

Changing Pain Management Strategy from Opioid-Centric towards Improve Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction with Dexmedetomidine

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed to investigate the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on improving the level of pain and disability to find out the possible correlation between psychological factors with pain management satisfaction and physical function in patients with femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-four adult patients with stable femoral neck fractures (type I and II, Garden classification) who underwent internal fixation, were prospectively enrolled including 62 patients in the DEX group and 62 patients in the control group. The magnitude of disability using Harris Hip Score, Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE score), Quality of Recovery (QoR-40), pain-related anxiety (PASS-20), pain management and pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) were recorded on the first and second day after surgery.

RESULTS

The DEX group on the first and second days after surgery exhibited higher quality of recovery scores, greater satisfaction with pain management, low disability scores, less catastrophic thinking, lower pain anxiety, greater mini mental state examination scores and less opioid intake and the differences were statistically significant compared with the control group (P<0.001). Emergence agitation and incidence of POCD were significantly less in the DEX group (P<0.001). Decreased disability was associated with less catastrophic thinking and lower pain anxiety, but not associated with more opioid intake (P<0.001). Higher QoR-40 scores had a negative correlation with more catastrophic thinking and more opioid intake (P<0.001). Greater satisfaction with pain management was correlated with less catastrophic thinking and less opioid intake (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Using DEX as an adjunct to anesthesia could significantly improve postoperative cognitive dysfunction and the quality of recovery and these improvements were accompanied by decrease in pain, emergence agitation, and opioid consumption by DEX administration. Since pain relief and decreased disability were not associated with prescribing greater amounts of opioid intake in the patients, improving psychological factors, including reducing catastrophic thinking or self-efficacy about pain, could be a more effective strategy to reduce pain and disability, meanwhile reducing opioid prescription in the patients. Our findings showed that DEX administration is safe sedation with anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antiemetic effects and it could help change pain management strategy from opioid-centric towards improved postoperative cognitive dysfunction.

Hand Therapy Patients' Psychosocial Symptomology and Interests in Mindfulness: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Psychosocial sequelae are common for individuals with physical injuries to the upper extremity. However, psychosocially oriented interventions are not common in this occupational therapy practice area. Purpose: This study implemented an online survey of hand therapy patients' psychological symptoms. Second, it explored patients' interest in one psychosocially oriented intervention: mindfulness meditation. Methods: The design was a cross-sectional survey of 120 consecutively recruited hand therapy patients. Survey measures included functioning, psychosocial factors, and trait mindfulness. Findings: Anxiety was prevalent in this sample, and moderately correlated with trait mindfulness (r = -0.542, p < .001). While most participants (77%) indicated mindfulness meditation would be an acceptable intervention, women were 2.8 times as likely to be interested (p = .044). Implications: Psychosocially oriented interventions are indicated in hand therapy based on the prevalence of these symptoms. Further examination of using mindfulness meditation in hand therapy is warranted due to patient interest.

A matched-control study on the effects of depressive disorders following open reduction and internal fixation for acetabular fractures

INTRODUCTION

The World Health Organization (WHO) postulates that depressive disorders (DD) will be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality by 2030. Studies evaluating the association of DD following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for the treatment of acetabular fractures are limited. Therefore, the purpose of this matched-control study was to determine whether DD patients undergoing ORIF for acetabular fractures have higher rates of: (1) in-hospital lengths of stay (LOS); (2) readmissions; (3) medical complications; and (4) costs of care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective query from the 100% Medicare Standard Analytical Files (SAF) was performed to identify patients who underwent ORIF for acetabular fractures. The study group consisted of those patients with DD, whereas patients without the condition served as controls. Primary endpoints of the study were to compare in-hospital LOS, readmission rates, ninety-day medical complications, and costs of care. A p-value less than 0.01 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The query yielded 7084 patients within the study (ORIF = 1187, control = 5897). DD patients were found to have significantly longer in-hospital LOS (11 days vs. 10 days, p < 0.0001); however, odds (OR) of readmission rates were similar (23.16 vs. 18.68%; OR: 0.91, p = 0.26). Multivariate regression demonstrated DD to be associated with significantly higher (67.69 vs. 25.54%; OR: 2.64, p < 0.0001) 90-day medical complications. DD patients had significantly higher day of surgery ($30,505.93 vs. $28,424.85, p < 0.0001) and total global 90-day costs ($41,721.98 vs. $37,330.16, p < 0.0001) of care.

CONCLUSION

After adjusting for covariates, DD is associated with longer in-hospital, complications, and costs of care in patients undergoing ORIF for the treatment of acetabular fractures, whereas readmission rates are similar. The study is vital as it can be used by orthopaedists and healthcare professionals to adequately educate these patients of the potential outcomes following their surgical procedure.

Self-Reported Feelings of Disability Following Lower Extremity Orthopaedic Trauma

BACKGROUND

Nearly 20% of Americans consider themselves disabled. A common cause of disability is unexpected orthopaedic trauma. The purpose of this current study, assessing common lower extremity trauma, is the following: to assess the prevalence of self-reported feelings of disability following these injuries, to determine if self-reported feelings of disability impact functional outcomes, and to understand patient characteristics associated with self-reported feelings of disability.

METHODS

The functional statuses of patients with tibial plateau fractures and ankle fractures were prospectively assessed. Patient reported feelings of disability (acquired from validated functional outcome surveys), which were compared with overall patient-reported functional outcome and emotional status at each follow-up visit. Additionally, patient demographics were analyzed, to assess associations with feelings of disability.

RESULTS

A total of 710 patients were included in our analysis. At short-term follow-up (3 months), a strong positive correlation existed between self-reported feelings of disability and worse functional outcomes (rs = 0.744, P < 0.001). At long-term follow-up (12-months), a strong positive correlation existed between self-reported feelings of disability and worse functional outcomes (rs = 0.741, P < 0.001). Self-reported feelings of disability were associated with increased age at both short-term (P = 0.015) and long-term (P = 0.003) follow-ups. At short-term follow-up, 41% of males and 59% of females self-reported feelings of disability (P < 0.001) No significant differences existed between genders at long-term follow-up (P = 0.252). Self-reported feelings of disability declined at each follow-up visit, from 48.1% at short-term follow-up to 22.1% at long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Self-reported feelings of disability, following lower extremity trauma, had strong positive correlations with worse outcomes. Orthopaedic trauma surgeons should be aware of the percentage of patients who feel disabled following lower extremity fractures, and know that this is associated with sub-optimal outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Pain during physical examination of a healing upper extremity fracture

The evidence that symptom intensity and magnitude of limitations correlate with thoughts and emotions means that subjective signs, such as pain with physical examination, reflect both physical and mental health. During a 1-month evaluation of a rapidly healing upper extremity fracture with no risk of nonunion, 117 people completed measures of adaptiveness to pain and pain during the physical examination. Greater pain during examination correlated with less adaptive responses to pain and older age. This finding raises questions about using tenderness to assess fracture union.Level of evidence: II.

The Psychological Effects of Musculoskeletal Trauma

Musculoskeletal injuries comprise a large percentage of hospital admissions for adults and often contribute to persistent daily pain as an illness; opioid dependence; disability; and complaints of increased depression, anxiety, and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. The prevalence of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder after orthopaedic trauma has been found to be considerably greater than the general adult cohort. Soon after sustaining a fracture, psychological factors can predict pain and disability many months after injury, even after controlling for injury severity. Thus, early in the care of orthopaedic trauma, there exists an opportunity to improve overall health by attending to psychological and social concerns, along with physical health. Recent literature has identified clinically actionable subgroups within the orthopaedic trauma cohort that are at psychological risk after an injury. Improving positive factors such as resilience, social support, and self-efficacy via validated interventions such as Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, mindfulness training, and other types of mindset training has helped people return to their daily routine. Raising awareness of the psychological effects of trauma among the orthopaedic community could improve post-treatment planning, increase referrals to appropriate nonmedical professionals, and implement earlier effective interventions.

Catastrophic Thinking and Pain Alleviation After Lower Extremity Surgery

OBJECTIVES

Requests for opioid pain medication more than a few weeks after surgery are associated with greater symptoms of depression and cognitive biases regarding pain such as worst-case thinking and fear of painful movement. We sought factors associated with patient desire for more opioid medication and satisfaction with pain alleviation at suture removal after lower extremity surgery.

DESIGN

Cross sectional study.

SETTING

Enrollment occurred at 1 of 4 orthopaedic offices in an urban setting.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

At suture removal after lower extremity surgery, 134 patients completed questionnaires measuring catastrophic thinking, ability to reach goals and continue normal activities in spite of pain, symptoms of depression, and magnitude of physical limitations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Psychological factors associated with questionnaire-reported patient desire for another opioid prescription, satisfaction with postoperative pain alleviation, and the self-reported number of pills remaining from original opioid prescription.

RESULTS

In logistic regression, smoking and greater catastrophic thinking were independently associated with desire for opioid refill (R2 = 0.20). Lower satisfaction with pain alleviation was associated with greater catastrophic thinking (R2 = 0.19). The size of surgery (large vs. medium/small procedure) was not associated with pain alleviation or satisfaction with pain alleviation.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between unhelpful cognitive bias regarding pain and request for more opioids reinforces the importance of diagnosing and addressing common misconceptions regarding pain in efforts to help people get comfortable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Patient experiences of rehabilitation following traumatic complex musculoskeletal injury – A mixed methods pilot study

Introduction

The aim of this pilot study was to measure patient reported outcomes and evaluate their rehabilitation experience following traumatic complex musculoskeletal (CMSK) injury.

Methods

A mixed methods prospective observational study was undertaken between December 2015 and March 2018 to explore patient reported outcomes following CMSK injury sustained as a result of major trauma and perception of their rehabilitation and its impact on their recovery. The participants were asked to complete a series of outcome measures at 18-months post-injury. The data was anonymised and analysed by the lead researcher.

Results

Thirty patients were recruited into the study (19 males, 11 females) between 23 and 76 years of age (median 52 years). Their injury profile was split between open fractures 30%, pelvic fractures 23%, multiple fractures 27% and polytrauma 20%. The majority (60%) reported moderate disability at 18-months post injury with 50% returning to full time employment. Patients with multiple or open fractures reported the worst outcomes. There was no relationship between frequency, quantity or duration of physiotherapy and outcome. However, 77% reported supplementing their NHS rehabilitation with other interventions such as gym membership, hydrotherapy and psychological therapies. The thematic analysis showed that patients considered intensity, quality and coordinated timely access to rehabilitation as the most important factors.

Conclusion

From a patient perspective, the current NHS rehabilitation provision does not appear to meet their complex needs. In addition to physical and vocational rehabilitation, patients wanted effective pain management and psychological support. Strengthening current therapy services and involving other sectors (e.g. Citizen’s Advice) could help achieve this. Early access to an intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme was perceived to have positive benefits and improve outcomes.

Patients' experiences and wellbeing after injury: A focus group study

Background

Injury can have physical, psychological and social consequences. It is unclear which factors have an impact on patients’ wellbeing after injury. This study aimed to explore, using focus groups, patients’ experiences and wellbeing after injury and which factors, impede or facilitate patients’ wellbeing.

Methods

Trauma patients, treated in the shock room of the Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, the Netherlands, participated in focus groups. Purposive sampling was used. Exclusion criteria were younger than 18 years old, severe traumatic brain injury, dementia, and insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using coding technique open, axial, and selective coding, based on phenomenological approach.

Results

Six focus groups (3 to 7 participants) were held before data saturation was reached. In total, 134 patients were invited, 28 (21%) agreed to participate (Median age: 59.5; min. 18 –max. 84). Main reasons to decline were fear that the discussion would be too confronting or patients experienced no problems regarding the trauma or treatment. Participants experienced difficulties on physical (no recovery to pre-trauma level), psychological (fear of dying or for permanent limitations, symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, cognitive dysfunction), social (impact on relatives and social support) wellbeing. These are impeding factors for recovery. However, good communication, especially clarity about the injury and expectations concerning recovery and future perspectives could help patients in surrendering to care. Patients felt less helpless when they knew what to expect.

Conclusions

This is the first study that explored patients’ experiences and wellbeing after injury. Patients reported that their injury had an impact on their physical, psychological, and social wellbeing up to 12 months after injury. Professionals with the knowledge of consequences after injury could improve their anticipation on patients’ need.

Interventional Efforts to Reduce Psychological Distress After Orthopedic Trauma: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Unanticipated severe injury to part of the musculoskeletal system, referred to as orthopedic trauma, can be debilitating. It can also be accompanied by equally debilitating psychological distress, but little is known about the effective interventions for psychological sequelae of orthopedic trauma.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We sought to determine the effectiveness of interventions on psychological outcomes, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and pain catastrophizing (feelings of helplessness, excessive rumination, and exaggerated description of pain), after major orthopedic trauma.

METHODS

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement as guidelines, we systematically searched Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Studies included for review were English-language interventional studies in an orthopedic trauma population that included assessment of post-injury psychological distress or disability as either a primary or secondary aim.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were identified, including six randomized trials, three prospective cohort studies, and three retrospective cohort studies. Study sample sizes ranged from 48 to 569 patients, the mean age ranged from 29 to 52.8 years, and the percentage of male patients ranged from 38 to 90%. We examined four categories of interventions. Peer group treatment (one study) significantly reduced rates of depression but had low participation rates. Brief interventions to teach coping and self-efficacy skills (two studies) decreased depression, pain catastrophizing, and anxiety scores while increasing self-efficacy on short-term follow-up. Individualized counseling and rehabilitation (four studies) resulted in a consistent reduction in the risk of PTSD. Early amputation was found to result in lower rates of PSTD than limb salvage in US military personnel (four studies). One study examined surgeons' confidence in dealing with possible psychological distress; surgeons who participated in a program on collaborative care were significantly more confident that they could help their patients with such issues.

CONCLUSION

Interventional strategies, including group interventions, brief individual interventions, longitudinal counseling, and consideration of early amputation in selected populations have proved effective in reducing negative psychological sequelae of major orthopedic trauma. Further research that determines the effects of interventions in this population is needed.

Prevalence and association of depression in in-patient orthopaedic trauma patients: A single centre study in India

INTRODUCTION

Depression is characterized by a persistent state of low mood and aversion to activity affecting a person's thoughts, behavior, feelings and sense of well-being. It has been reported in Orthopaedic trauma patients. Depression is likely to interfere in an individual's ability to sustain a long duration rehabilitation programme leading to poor function and delayed return to a productive lifestyle. The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence and identify factors associated with depression in indoor Orthopaedic trauma patients.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study was conducted on 190 adult Orthopaedic trauma patients enrolled on a randomly selected day of a week subject to written informed consent. Patients with conditions that may preclude assessment of the mental status were excluded from the study. Age, sex, duration since injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), type of surgery, marital status, insurance coverage, level of education, socioeconomic status, familial support, substance abuse. Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) score and pain score (visual analogue scale) were recorded as soon as the patient was stabilized. Bivariate analyses and Logistic regression were used to identify factors associated with a HADS score of ≥8.

RESULTS

Mean age was 33.8 years. One hundred fifty-one (79.47%) patients were males and thirty-nine patients were females (21.53%). A HADS score ≥8 was present in 42.63% enrolled cases. On logistic regression a higher pain score, nuclear family, and female sex were found to be significantly associated with HADS ≥8.

CONCLUSION

Depression is common in indoor Orthopaedic trauma patients. HADS may be used to screen patients for depression and refer patients to a psychiatrist for a definitive diagnosis and management.

Patient-Reported Outcomes following Surgical Treatment of Symptomatic Digital Neuromas

BACKGROUND

Many surgical techniques are used to treat symptomatic neuroma, but options are limited for digital neuromas because of a paucity of soft-tissue coverage and/or the absence of the terminal nerve end. The authors assessed factors that influence patient-reported outcomes after surgery for symptomatic digital neuroma.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively identified 29 patients with 33 symptomatic digital neuromas that were treated surgically. Patients completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity and Pain Interference scales, a numeric rating scale for pain, and the PROMIS Depression scale at a median follow-up of 7.6 years postoperatively (range, 3.2 to 16.8 years). Surgical treatment for neuroma included excision with nerve repair/reconstruction (n =13; 39 percent), neuroma excision alone (n =10; 30 percent), and excision and implantation (n =10; 30 percent). Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify the factors that independently influenced patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative PROMIS Upper Extremity score was 45.2 ± 11.2, the mean Pain Interference score was 54.3 ± 10.7, and the mean numeric rating scale pain score was 3 (interquartile range, 1 to 5). Compared with other treatment techniques, neuroma excision with nerve repair/reconstruction was associated with lower numeric rating scale pain scores; lower Pain Interference scores, corresponding to less daily impact of pain; and higher Upper Extremity scores, reflecting better upper extremity function. Older age and higher Depression scores were associated with lower Upper Extremity scores and higher Pain Interference scores. Smoking was associated with higher Pain Interference and numeric rating scale pain scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuroma excision followed by nerve repair/reconstruction resulted in better outcomes compared with neuroma excision alone with or without implantation. Patient age and psychosocial factors influenced patient-reported outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Do PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression Correlate to the Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index in Spine Trauma Patients?

STUDY DESIGN

Correlational study.

OBJECTIVE

In spine trauma patients, we aimed to assess the correlation of patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and Depression scores with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) ODI/NDI scores.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The ODI and NDI were intended as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients seeking spine care. To date, the PROMIS has not been studied in the spine trauma population.

METHODS

Between January 1, 2015 and December 13, 2017, patients presenting to a single, level 1 trauma center spine clinic with known spine trauma were identified. A total of 56 patients (52 operative, 4 nonoperative) representing 181 encounters were identified. PROMIS PF, PI, and Depression, as well as the ODI or NDI, were administered to patients. Spearman rho (ρ) were calculated between PROMs.

RESULTS

A strong correlation exists between PROMIS PI and the ODI (ρ = 0.79, P < 0.001), while a strong-moderate correlation exists between PROMIS PF and the ODI (ρ = -0.61, P < 0.001). A moderate correlation exists between PROMIS Depression and the ODI (ρ = 0.54, P < 0.001). Strong correlations exist between PROMIS PI and the NDI (ρ = 0.71, P < 0.001) and PROMIS Depression and the NDI (ρ = 0.73, P < 0.001). A poor correlation exists between PROMIS PF and the NDI (ρ = -0.28, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

PROMIS PF, PI, and Depression domains significantly correlate with the ODI and NDI; however, only PROMIS PI strongly correlates with both the NDI and ODI. This suggests that PROMIS PI can be used to capture similar information to that of the ODI or NDI but that PROMIS PF and Depression may offer additional clinical information.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Psychological factors and recovery from trauma

Recent research has identified a high prevalence of psychological illnesses in patients who have sustained orthopaedic trauma. Depressive symptoms in this patient population have been reported to range from 13% to as high as 56%. Moreover, symptoms of depression, catastrophic thinking, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), have been consistently shown to negatively impact patient outcomes following treatment for their traumatic injuries. Specifically, patients with higher levels of psychosocial dysfunction have shown increased levels of pain, disability, and complications throughout their recovery. However, current research in orthopaedic trauma continues to be substantially focused on the physical and technical factors involved in the treatment of orthopaedic injuries. More research which applies the "biopsychosocial model" of health and evaluates the significant impact of psychological and social factors on recovery from trauma is needed. In particular, investigation which evaluates effective screening strategies and interventions to treat psychosocial dysfunction during recovery from trauma is highly desirable. This article reviews the current state of knowledge in this area and suggests future directions for research.

Can an Integrative Care Approach Improve Physical Function Trajectories after Orthopaedic Trauma? A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Orthopaedic trauma patients frequently experience mobility impairment, fear-related issues, self-care difficulties, and work-related disability []. Recovery from trauma-related injuries is dependent upon injury severity as well as psychosocial factors []. However, traditional treatments do not integrate psychosocial and early mobilization to promote improved function, and they fail to provide a satisfying patient experience.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We sought to determine (1) whether an early psychosocial intervention (integrative care with movement) among patients with orthopaedic trauma improved objective physical function outcomes during recovery compared with usual care, and (2) whether an integrative care approach with orthopaedic trauma patients improved patient-reported physical function outcomes during recovery compared with usual care.

METHODS

Between November 2015 and February 2017, 1133 patients were admitted to one hospital as orthopaedic trauma alerts to the care of the three orthopaedic trauma surgeons involved in the study. Patients with severe or multiple orthopaedic trauma requiring one or more surgical procedures were identified by our orthopaedic trauma surgeons and approached by study staff for enrollment in the study. Patients were between 18 years and 85 years of age. We excluded individuals outside of the age range; those with diagnosis of a traumatic brain injury []; those who were unable to communicate effectively (for example, at a level where self-report measures could not be answered completely); patients currently using psychotropic medications; or those who had psychotic, suicidal, or homicidal ideations at time of study enrollment. A total of 112 orthopaedic trauma patients were randomized to treatment groups (integrative and usual care), with 13 withdrawn (n = 99; 58% men; mean age 44 years ± 17 years). Data was collected at the following time points: baseline (acute hospitalization), 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and at 1 year. By 1-year follow-up, we had a 75% loss to follow-up. Because our data showed no difference in the trajectories of these outcomes during the first few months of recovery, it is highly unlikely that any differences would appear months after 6 months. Therefore, analyses are presented for the 6-month follow-up time window. Integrative care consisted of usual trauma care plus additional resources, connections to services, as well as psychosocial and movement strategies to help patients recover. Physical function was measured objectively (handgrip strength, active joint ROM, and Lower Extremity Gain Scale) and subjectively (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function [PROMIS®-PF] and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia). Higher values for hand grip, Lower Extremity Gain Scale (score range 0-27), and PROMIS®-PF (population norm = 50) are indicative of higher functional ability. Lower Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (score range 11-44) scores indicate less fear of movement. Trajectories of these measures were determined across time points.

RESULTS

We found no differences at 6 months follow-up between usual care and integrative care in terms of handgrip strength (right handgrip strength β = -0.0792 [95% confidence interval -0.292 to 0.133]; p = 0.46; left handgrip strength β = -0.133 [95% CI -0.384 to 0.119]; p = 0.30), or Lower Extremity Gain Scale score (β = -0.0303 [95% CI -0.191 to 0.131]; p = 0.71). The only differences between usual care and integrative care in active ROM achieved by final follow-up within the involved extremity was noted in elbow flexion, with usual care group 20° ± 10° less than integrative care (t [27] = -2.06; p = 0.05). Patients treated with usual care and integrative care showed the same Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia score trajectories (β = 0.0155 [95% CI -0.123 to 0.154]; p = 0.83).

CONCLUSION

Our early psychosocial intervention did not change the trajectory of physical function recovery compared with usual care. Although this specific intervention did not alter recovery trajectories, these interventions should not be abandoned because the greatest gains in function occur early in recovery after trauma, which is the key time in transition to home. More work is needed to identify ways to capitalize on improvements earlier within the recovery process to facilitate functional gains and combat psychosocial barriers to recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

Global Research on Quality of Life of Patients with HIV/AIDS: Is It Socio-Culturally Addressed? (GAPRESEARCH)

Quality of life (QOL) has been considered as an important outcome indicator in holistic care for HIV-infected people, especially as HIV/AIDS transforms from a fatal illness to a chronic condition. This study aimed to identify trends and emerging topics among research concerning the QOL of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). The analyzed data were English papers published from 1996 to 2017, searched and extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection. Collaborations between countries and the correlation between the keywords were visualized by VOSviewer while the abstracts’ content was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis and Jaccard’s’ similarity index. There has been an increase in both the number of publications and citations. The United Nations of America leads in terms of paper volume. The cross-nation collaborations are mainly regional. Despite a rather comprehensive coverage of topics relating to QOL in PLWHA, there has evidently been a lack of studies focusing on socio-cultural factors and their impacts on the QOL of those who are HIV-infected. Further studies should consider investigating the role of socio-cultural factors, especially where long-term treatment is involved. Policy-level decisions are recommended to be made based on the consideration of cultural factors, while collaborations between developed and developing nations, in particular in HIV/AIDS-ridden countries, are strongly recommended.

Does Intolerance of Uncertainty Affect the Magnitude of Limitations or Pain Intensity?

BACKGROUND

Intolerance of uncertainty-the tendency to overestimate the chance of and be unwilling to accept potential, but unlikely, negative outcomes in uncertain situations-is a cognitive construct that has been shown to affect symptoms and limitations for patients with traumatic and nontraumatic upper-extremity conditions. Cognitive flexibility and tolerance of uncertainty can be trained and practiced, with the potential to increase musculoskeletal health. However, to our knowledge, the degree to which intolerance of uncertainty might be associated with symptom intensity and the magnitude of limitations in adults with upper-extremity problems has not been characterized.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

After accounting for personal and social factors, is intolerance of uncertainty independently associated with (1) the magnitude of physical limitations and (2) pain intensity?

METHODS

In this cross-sectional, observational study, 139 new and returning patients presenting to one of four orthopaedic offices in a large urban area completed the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (a validated measure of the level of comfort with uncertain situations), the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function Upper Extremity computer adaptive test (to measure the magnitude of limitations), and an 11-point ordinal measure of pain intensity. The mean age of the 139 participants was 51 years ± 16 years and 55% (76 of 139) were men. Participants presented to the clinics with a wide variety of upper-extremity conditions, such as trigger finger, distal radius fractures, lateral epicondylitis, or non-specific shoulder pain. We also assessed sex, race, marital status, education level, income, public versus private insurance, area deprivation index, and the participant's self-perception of their healthcare experience through a multiple-choice question (answer choices: none, some, a little, and a lot of experience). The following patient characteristics were more common in our study participants: white, employed, part of a married or unmarried couple, and private insurance coverage. We created two multivariable linear regression models to assess factors independently associated with the magnitude of limitations and pain intensity.

RESULTS

After controlling for potentially confounding variables including sex, insurance, area deprivation index, and type of visit, we found that fewer physical limitations were associated with a greater intolerance of uncertainty (regression coefficient [β] -0.30; 95% confidence interval, -0.50 to -0.10; p = 0.003; semi-partial r = 0.07; adjusted r for the full model = 0.16), as was being a man (β 3.2; 95% CI, 0.08-6.3; p = 0.045; semi-partial r = 0.03) and having private insurance coverage (β 5.2; 95% CI, 2.1-8.2; p = 0.001; semi-partial r = 0.08). After controlling for one important potentially confounding variable, the level of education, greater pain intensity was associated with a greater intolerance of uncertainty (β 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.14; p = 0.009; semi-partial r = 0.05; adjusted r for the full model = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Intolerance of uncertainty-a byproduct of cognitive bias and error, which are elements of the normal functioning of the human mind-increases limitations and pain intensity across diagnoses, independent of demographic and social factors. Future studies can address the effect of strategies that incorporate mindset training (for example, cognitive behavioral therapy and its derivatives) on musculoskeletal symptoms and limitations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prognostic study.

Patient Characteristics, Treatment, and Presenting PROMIS Scores Associated with Number of Office Visits for Traumatic Hand and Wrist Conditions

BACKGROUND

Overuse of healthcare resources is burdensome on society. Prior research has demonstrated that many patients with traumatic musculoskeletal injuries continue to seek care long after appropriate healing is well established, suggesting an overuse of services. However, few studies have examined the factors-including patient-reported outcomes-associated with an increased number of clinic visits for traumatic hand and wrist conditions.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) After accounting for surgical treatment, surgeon, and demographic factors, is a patient's PROMIS Pain Interference score associated with the total number of office visits? (2) Is PROMIS Depression, combination of PROMIS Depression and Pain Interference, or Physical Function scores associated with the number of office visits?

METHODS

Between June 2015 and May 2018, 1098 patients presenting for a new patient visit at a single, urban academic medical center for distal radius fracture, wrist or hand sprain, tendon rupture, traumatic finger amputation, or scaphoid fracture were identified. Of those, 823 (75%) patients completed all PROMIS domains and presented before the trailing period and thus were included in this retrospective study. We recorded a number of variables including: Total number of office visits, age, sex, race, marital status, diagnosis, provider, and operative or nonoperative treatment. Multivariable Poisson regression analysis was conducted to determine whether Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS PI), Physical Function (PROMIS PF), and Depression scores measured at the first visit were associated with the total number of office visits, after accounting for the other factors we measured.

RESULTS

Higher PROMIS PI scores were associated with greater number of clinic visits (0.0077; 95% CI, 0.0018-0.014; p = 0.010). Although PROMIS Depression scores were not associated with the number of office visits (0.0042; 95% CI, -0.0099 to 0.0094; p = 0.112), higher PROMIS PF scores were associated with fewer office visits when accounting for confounding variables (-0.0077; 95% CI, -0.0012 to -0.0029; p = 0.001). Additionally, across all individual PROMIS models, there was an association between the variables "operative treatment" (PI: 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98; p < 0.001; Depression: 0.87; 95% CI, 0.74-1.0; p < 0.001; PF: 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72-0.99; p < 0.001) and "traumatic finger amputation" (PI: 0.22; 95% CI, 0.016-0.42; p = 0.034; Depression: 0.2; 95% CI, 0.086-0.47; p = 0.005; PF: 0.21; 95% CI, 0.014-0.41; p = 0.036) with an increased total number of office visits. Provider team 5 (PI: -0.62; 95% CI, -0.98 to -0.27; p = 0.001; Depression: -0.61; 95% CI, -0.96 to -0.26; p = 0.001; PF: -0.60; 95% CI, -0.96 to -0.25; p = 0.001) was associated with fewer office visits. In both the PROMIS Depression and PROMIS PF regression models, increasing age (Depression: -0.0048; 95% CI, -0.0088 to -0.00081; p = 0.018; PF: -0.0045; 95% CI, -0.0085 to -0.0006; p = 0.024) was also associated with fewer total number of office visits.

CONCLUSIONS

This study helps surgeons understand that patients who present at their initial office visit for traumatic hand and wrist conditions displaying worse pain coping strategies and decreased physical function will have more office visits. We recommend that surgeons engage in a comprehensive care approach that is empathetic, fosters effective pain coping strategies (and so might decrease PROMIS PI scores), and educates patients about expectations by providing educational materials and/or including other health professionals (such as, social work, physical therapy, mental health professional) as needed. This may decrease healthcare use in patients with traumatic hand and wrist conditions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic study.

Factors associated with the magnitude of limitations during recovery from a fracture of the proximal humerus

Aims

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with limitations in function, measured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), six to nine months after a proximal humeral fracture, from a range of demographic, injury, psychological, and social variables measured within a week and two to four weeks after injury.

Patients and Methods

We enrolled 177 adult patients who sustained an isolated proximal humeral fracture into the study and invited them to complete PROMs at their initial outpatient visit within one week of injury, between two and four weeks, and between six to nine months after injury. There were 128 women and 49 men; the mean age was 66 years (sd 16; 18 to 95). In all, 173 patients completed the final assessment. Bivariate analysis was performed followed by multivariable regression analysis accounting for multicollinearity using partial R2, correlation matrices, and variable inflation factor.

Results

Many variables within a week of injury and between two and four weeks after injury correlated with six- to nine-month PROMs in bivariate analysis. Kinesiophobia measured within a week of injury (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11: partial R2 = 0.14; p = 0.000) and self-efficacy measured between two and four weeks (Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire-2: partial R2 = 0.266; p < 0.001) were the strongest predictors of limitations (measured by Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS UE)) at six to nine months in multivariable analysis. Similar findings were observed with other types of PROM. Regression models accounted for a substantial amount of variance in all PROMs at both timepoints (e.g. 66% of the overall variance within one week, and 70% within two to four weeks for PROMIS UE at six to nine months).

Conclusion

Recovery from a proximal humeral fracture appears to be enhanced by overcoming fears of movement or reinjury within a week after injury and greater self-efficacy (developing resilience and more effective coping strategies) within a month. Such factors are modifiable using enhanced communication skills and cognitive behavioural treatments. These findings could be a catalyst for the routine assessment and treatment of psychological and social factors in the management of patients with fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:715–723.