Endothelial keratoplasty without Descemet's stripping in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy

Pediatric corneal transplantation: techniques, challenges, and outcomes

Pediatric corneal transplant is a highly demanding and technically challenging procedure for the cornea surgeon in today's era. These cases pose unique challenges in clinical and surgical management. The indications of pediatric corneal transplant can be therapeutic, tectonic, optical, and cosmetic. Pediatric patients undergoing corneal transplants are at a high risk of graft infection, failure, rejection, dehiscence, and amblyopia due to young age, robust immune system, increased incidence of trauma, and compliance issues. The other factors contributing to graft failure can be allograft rejection, secondary glaucoma, corneal vascularization, multiple surgeries, vitreous prolapse, and lack of treatment compliance. A successful corneal transplant in children depends on meticulous preoperative evaluation, uneventful surgery, the expertise of a corneal surgeon, and regular and timely postoperative follow-up. Therapeutic and optical penetrating keratoplasty are the most commonly performed transplants in children. However, with the advancements in surgical technique and management protocol, the current focus has shifted toward lamellar keratoplasty. Lamellar keratoplasty offers early visual recovery and potentially fewer complications. Visual rehabilitation through corneal transplant in otherwise blind eyes can be a boon for the children. Recently, keratoprostheses have been promising in children with multiple graft failures. The current review gives insights into epidemiology, etiology, indications, clinical characteristics, investigations, management options, recent advances, and the future of pediatric corneal transplants. As surgical techniques continue to grow and comprehension of pediatric corneal transplants is improving, we can safeguard these eyes with the best possible anatomical and functional outcomes.

12-year follow-up of the first endothelial keratoplasty without Descemet stripping in a 3-month newborn with Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy (CHED)

BACKGROUND

Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) is now considered as the standard treatment for Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy (CHED) by many surgeons. We present the 12-year clinical outcome of the youngest operated patient with CHED in which we successfully performed a bilateral EK procedure without removing the recipient endothelium-Descemet complex.

CASE PRESENTATION

In November 2010 we performed EK without Descemet Stripping in a 3-month female newborn, thinking that the lower manipulation obtained by leaving the recipient endothelium-Descemet complex could be the key factor for the success of our surgery. Such a particular technique was new in newborns. The surgery was a success, but the long-term visual result was not predictable at that time. We followed the patient at 4 months, and then yearly. At the latest visit in October 2022 the visual, cognitive, and motorial developments were normal, with Best-corrected Distance Visual Acuity of 0.4 LogMAR with - 0.75 D sf + 2.75 D cyl @ 105° in the right eye (RE) and 0.4 LogMAR with + 1.50 D sf + 2.50 D cyl @ 60° in the left eye (LE). The endothelial microscope showed an unexpected healthy endothelium, with a cell count of 2383 cells/mm2 in the RE and of 2547 cells/mm2 in the LE from a starting donor count of 2900 cells/mm2. No secondary procedures were performed during the 12-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

EK without Descemet stripping has proved to be a successful procedure over time in our newborn. The unexpected healthy endothelium suggests a role of the Descemet membrane in CHED.

Updates on congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy

Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED) is a rare genetic corneal disorder causing progressive cornea clouding and significant visual impairment. CHED remains a leading indication for pediatric corneal transplantation despite its infrequency, particularly in regions with high consanguinity rates like Southeast Asia. Identifying the Solute Carrier Family 4 Member 11 (SLC4A11) gene as the genetic basis of CHED has led to the discovery of it's various genetic variations. However, a comprehensive understanding of its clinical-genetic correlation, pathophysiology, and optimal management is ongoing. This review aims to consolidate current knowledge about CHED, covering its genetic origins, pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical presentation, and management strategies. Surgical intervention, such as penetrating keratoplasty (PK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), remains the primary treatment. DSAEK and DMEK offer advantages over PK, including quicker visual recovery, reduced complications, and longer graft survival, especially in the pediatric age group. The timing of surgical interventions depends on disease severity, age at presentation, comorbidities, and visual potential. Elevated oxidative stress in CHED corneal tissue suggests potential benefits from anti-inflammatory drugs to rescue mutated endothelial cells. Considering the limitations of corneal graft surgeries, exploring novel gene-based molecular therapies are essential for future management. Early diagnosis, appropriate surgical interventions, amblyopia control, and genetic counseling for predictive analysis are pivotal for optimizing CHED management. A multidisciplinary approach involving ophthalmologists, researchers, and genetic counselors is essential for precise diagnosis and optimal care for CHED patients.

Novel Proposed Algorithm in Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy

PURPOSE

Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED) is a rare, autosomal recessive, monogenic corneal condition with variable expressivity. Often presents in bilateral symmetrical progressive corneal cloudiness that starts in the early infancy. It is characterized by increased corneal thickness, profound corneal edema, and thickening of the Descemet membrane due to endothelial dysfunction. The published literature lacks uniform guidelines for grading corneal cloudiness and management algorithm for CHED cases. This article focuses on applying newer investigational modalities to fine-tune surgical outcomes and more recent CHED management strategies.

METHODS

This comprehensive literature review was performed based on a search on the PubMed database of relevant CHED articles focusing on those published in the last 7 years. A total of around 70 articles were reviewed, and 17 of them were included in this review. These include systemic reviews, randomized controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-controlled studies, and case series.

RESULTS

Corneal cloudiness grading in CHED using subjective and objective methods using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) and densitometry using Scheimpflug imaging can help select appropriate management plan for CHED cases. DSAEK outscores penetrating keratoplasty with much fewer complications and expedites visual recovery, which helps mitigate amblyopia.

CONCLUSION

Managing cases of CHED has been a challenge due to the dilemma in timing and appropriate surgical method selection and lack of definitive medical or other conservative approaches. Currently, DSAEK has shown favorable results in cases of CHED. However, appropriate staging of CHED and selecting the appropriate management approach appears to play a critical role in managing such cases. Besides these, novel treatment modalities such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDS) that target restoring water-flux activity in subtype of CHED and gene editing using CRISPR-Cas9 are promising paradigm treatment modalities.

A review of techniques and outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy

Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy affects the Descemet membrane and endothelium, resulting in corneal decompensation. Penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) has been the gold-standard surgical management until recently; however, at present, endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK/DSAEK/n-DSEK: Descemet-stripping or non-Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and DMEK/n-DMEK: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) is being preferred due to lesser intraoperative and postoperative complications, early visual recovery, and comparable visual outcomes. Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) can be challenging, especially in pediatric eyes with CHED due to smaller eyeballs, shallow anterior chambers, phakic status, and poor intraoperative visibility due to thick and hazy corneas. A total of 198 articles matched our search strategy. After screening for duplication and going through the titles and abstracts, 12 relevant original articles, one case series, and six case reports were included in this review. Various surgical modifications have to be adopted in comparison to adult eyes to overcome the aforementioned difficulties. Regardless, studies have shown favorable visual outcomes with better graft survival and fewer complications in eyes that underwent EK compared to PKP. Hence, timely surgical intervention and strict amblyopia management can result in better final visual outcomes. The purpose of this review is to summarize various intraoperative difficulties and the surgical modifications required, different surgical techniques, visual and graft-related outcomes, and various complications of EK in CHED eyes.

Penetrating Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Children With Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy: Long-Term Results

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in patients with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, comparative study of all the patients with a histopathological diagnosis of CHED who underwent PKP or DSAEK between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2016. All the cases were included except those patients who had clear grafts but did not complete 2 years of postoperative follow-up. The main outcome measure was graft clarity 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

There were 111 eyes of 63 patients. Seventy-six eyes underwent PKP, and 35 eyes underwent DSAEK. The median age at surgery was 6.8 years in the PKP group and 10.32 years in the DSAEK group. At 2 years postoperatively, clear grafts were noted in 66 of 76 (86.8%) eyes in the PKP group and 30 of 35 (85.7%) eyes in the DSAEK group. At the last follow-up, 80.3% of PKP grafts and 82.8% of DSAEK grafts were clear ( P =0.5). The type and timing of complications differed between the 2 groups. The PKP group had a statistically significant higher rate of graft rejection (19.5%) versus the DSAEK group (0%) ( P =0.01). DSAEK complications were mainly lenticule detachment that developed within one month postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in the visual outcomes at the last follow-up between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Endothelial keratoplasty is a safe alternative to conventional PKP in CHED. The visual outcome and survival rates were comparable, but DSAEK had a lower rejection rate and fewer suture-related complications.

Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Pediatric Age Group: A Decade of Our Experience

PURPOSE

This study was to report the outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in managing corneal endothelial disorders in children less than 14 years of age.

METHODS

Medical records of 180 DSAEK performed, between 2008 and 2020, on 167 eyes of 111 children who had a visually significant endothelial dysfunction were retrospectively reviewed for the primary etiology of corneal decompensation, time of the onset and duration of cloudiness, preoperative visual acuity, the technique of endothelial keratoplasty, surgical modifications, and reintervention.

RESULTS

Median age at surgical intervention was 7.9 years (interquartile range, 5.2-11.2 years). At a median postinterventional follow-up of 2.5 years (interquartile range, 0.9-3.4 years), 86.2% (144 of 167 eyes, 95% confidence interval 79.9%-90.1%) maintained a clear graft. Median best-corrected visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) improved from 1.45 ± 0.70 preoperatively to 0.90 ± 0.06 at the last follow-up visit (P < 0.0001). The cumulative overall long-term graft survival was 92.7%, 86.5%, and 77.7% at 1, 3, and 7 years, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the indication for DSAEK (P = 0.007; hazards ratio: 2.17 ± 0.62), age at surgery (P = 0.02; hazards ratio: 0.87 ± 0.05), and any subsequent intervention after DSAEK (P = 0.003; hazards ratio: 0.11 ± 0.08) were significant risk factors for DSAEK failure. The endothelial cell loss was 40.1% at 6 months, 45.4% at 1 year, 55.2% at 5 years, and 61.9% at 7 years.

CONCLUSIONS

DSAEK is a safe and effective surgical strategy in managing endothelial disorders among the pediatric age group.

Pediatric endothelial keratoplasty: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recently, endothelial keratoplasty (EK) has been increasingly considered the first intervention in pediatrics with isolated corneal endothelial dysfunction. This systematic review aims to investigate the current evidence about the advantages, disadvantages, technical challenges, and clinical outcomes of EK in the pediatric group.

METHOD

All the English literature relevant to pediatric EK was searched in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases with appropriate keywords. Relevant data were pooled to conduct an individual participant data meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1646 articles found initially, 35 articles were finally eligible to be included in our study. A total of 154 eyes of 107 patients underwent Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED) was the most reported indication for pediatric DSAEK (108 eyes). Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) was performed in 2 eyes of 2 cases, one with PPCD and another one in a patient with Kearns-Sayre syndrome. Owing to some specific anatomical and physiological pediatric characteristics, some modifications in a standard procedure were suggested. The average follow-up period was 23.80 ± 20.18 months (3 months to 8.5 years). Seventy-six eyes who had a mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 1.36 ± 0.70 (0.49 to 3) logMAR preoperatively found mean BCVA of 0.51 ± 0.33 (0.04 to 2) logMAR postoperatively. Graft dislocation was the most reported complication (26 eyes). The rate of other complications was low. Endothelial cell loss was reported from 8.3 to 63.7% after pediatric EK with follow-up duration from 3 months to 8.3 years.

CONCLUSION

EK procedures, despite some technical challenges, are feasible surgical techniques with acceptable visual and anatomical outcomes in the management of pediatrics with corneal endothelial dysfunction and minimal stromal involvement.

Microscope Integrated Optical Coherence Tomography Guided Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy

Purpose

To describe the outcomes of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED) and to evaluate the role of microscope integrated optical coherence tomography (Mi-OCT) during the surgery.

Design

Retrospective data analysis.

Methods

A retrospective study from the medical records of all those patients who were diagnosed with CHED and underwent DSAEK at our centre from 2015 were evaluated. All patients underwent Mi-OCT-guided standard DSAEK procedure. Intra-operative difficulties, visual outcomes and graft survival were recorded.

Results

A total of 48 eyes of 29 patients with a mean age of 9.87 ± 8.2 years and mean follow-up of 17.3 months were evaluated. Thirty-nine eyes underwent primary DSAEK and 9 eyes underwent PKP. Three eyes who underwent PKP had failed graft for which they underwent DSAEK. The mean preoperative Snellen's visual acuity was 1.71 ± 0.66 and the mean preoperative central corneal thickness was 1.10 ± 0.174 mm. Intraoperatively, all the grafts were attached which was confirmed using Mi-OCT. Graft detachment was seen in the immediate postoperative period in 10.4% (4 eyes) of primary DSAEK, out of which DM scoring was not performed in 2 eyes. Following DSAEK, cornea cleared at four-week follow-up in 89.7% eyes and in all the eyes the cornea cleared at six-week follow-up.

Conclusion

Primary DSAEK could be a preferred option over PKP for CHED with early presentation and in those eyes with failed primary PKP. Mi-OCT is a very useful tool in these eyes for various intraoperative procedures, thereby improving the outcomes of the procedure.

Role of Anterior Segment OCT for Descemet Membrane Stripping During Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes With Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy

PURPOSE

To report the utility of preoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) in decision-making for stripping of the Descemet membrane (DM) during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in eyes with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED).

METHODS

ASOCT was performed in eyes with CHED undergoing DMEK. Host DM was retained if the DM appearance was normal on ASOCT. Outcomes of DMEK with or without DM stripping (non DM stripping [DMEK]) were analyzed and compared regarding graft adhesion, graft clarity, visual acuity, and complications.

RESULTS

Twelve eyes of 8 patients were included in the series. Of these, 6 eyes (mean age, 6 ± 2.6 years, range 3-8 years) underwent nDMEK and 6 eyes (mean age, 23.6 ± 10.2 years, range 13-39 years) underwent standard DMEK. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. During the early postoperative period, one eye in the nDMEK group had donor detachment that was successfully managed by repeat air injection. The mean preoperative and postoperative corrected visual acuities were 1.15 and 0.37 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) in the nDMEK group, and 0.95 and 0.25 LogMAR in the DMEK group (P 0.39 and 0.06). Average endothelial cell counts were 1826 ± 318 cell/mm in the nDMEK group (32.3% loss), and 1708 ± 271 cells/mm in the DMEK group (33.6% loss) at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative anterior segment OCT is useful in decision-making regarding stripping of host DM during DMEK in eyes with CHED. The outcomes of nDMEK were similar to DMEK in this small series.

Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty in Pediatric Patients with Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy

PURPOSE

To report the long-term outcomes of Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) with suture-assisted donor lenticule insertion performed in different age groups for pediatric patients with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED).

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Pediatric patients with CHED who underwent DSEK from January 2010 to January 2016 were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their ages: the infant group and the child group. Long-term clinical outcomes and complications were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty eyes of 16 patients were included: 19 eyes (10 patients) in the child group and 11 eyes (6 patients) in the infant group. The average duration of follow-up was 4.08 ± 1.90 years (range 2.5-8.5 years). Corneal transparency scores of the 2 groups on postoperative day 7 were not statistically different. The average postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the infant group (logMAR 0.32 ± 0.11) was better than that in the child group (logMAR 0.54 ± 0.20; (P = .01). Thirty-three percent of cases in the child group and 86% of cases in the infant group had postoperative BCVA achieved or better than logMAR 0.4. Average endothelial cell loss in the child group was 31.21% ± 9.17%. Lenticule detachment occurred in 3 cases in the child group.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved visual outcomes could be achieved in infant patients with CHED after DSEK without significant complications. Suture-assisted donor lenticule insertion techniques, Descemet membrane stripping, and postoperative sedation are advocated technical points.

Outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy

Background/aim

To report the outcome of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in Irish patients with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED).

Methods

A retrospective case series review of patients with CHED who underwent PKP was conducted. The outcomes of PKP in 14 patients with CHED at the Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital in Dublin from 1978 to 2013 were described following case note review. The main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and graft survival.

Results

Thirty-three corneal transplants were performed, which included 32 PKPs and one Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Twenty-four eyes underwent primary corneal grafts and nine eyes had regrafts. The graft survival rates at final follow-up were 37.5% and 33% in the primary graft and regraft groups, respectively. Preoperative BCVA was 20/200 or worse in all patients. At the final postoperative visit, the BCVA was 20/80 or better in four eyes following primary PKP, 20/160 in one eye following regrafting and was 20/200 or worse in all other eyes. The mean time to graft failure was 16 months (range 0–37 months). The mean follow-up time was 101 months (range 12–252 months). Fifty per cent of the patients continue to attend for follow-up.

Conclusions

This study has demonstrated a poor outcome from PKP for CHED in this Irish cohort. This arises from a combination of dense amblyopia and a high risk of graft failure in the long term.

The challenging management of pediatric corneal transplantation: an overview of surgical and clinical experiences

PURPOSE

Pediatric keratoplasty is an immense challenge because of the technical complexity of the procedure and the high risk of rejection in young graft recipients. Our aim is to describe the major indications and appropriate timing of corneal transplantation intervention, including a report of our experience and surgical tips, in conjunction with the current literature.

METHODS

Review of the literature on indications for keratoplasty in pediatric patients classified as: congenital, traumatic and acquired non-traumatic opacities. We additionally explored the challenges corneal surgeons face in performing this type of surgery and review the most pressing transplant-related problems and their management.

RESULTS

Outcomes after pediatric keratoplasty, in terms of visual development, restoration and clarity of the graft, are influenced by peri-operative local and systemic conditions and factors, and by intraoperative management of the transplantation procedure itself.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric corneal transplantation is a critical tool for visual restoration and development in young patients with corneal opacities, particularly during the critical period of visual development. Successful management of the significant challenges associated with pediatric keratoplasty requires customized clinical and surgical management of each patient with particular attention paid to proper post-operative rehabilitation.

[Treatment of corneal endothelial disorders by DMEK and UT-DSAEK. Indications, complications, results and follow-up]

Various techniques for posterior lamellar keratoplasty have been established for the clinical routine and continuously improved during the last 15 years so that an extremely rapid recovery of vision is possible due to very thin transplants. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is the method of choice for simple corneal endothelial diseases and has already been applied in complex conditions of the anterior segment. The learning curve for DMEK is comparatively long and the risk of complications in complex anterior segment pathologies is higher than in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK); however, DMEK results in better visual outcome and less graft rejections than DSAEK. The latest evolution in posterior lamellar transplant surgery is ultrathin DSAEK (UT-DSAEK), where the grafted lamella is much thinner than in conventional DSAEK. Currently available data suggest that the resulting visual acuity after UT-DSAEK is close to the visual acuity seen after DMEK; however, studies comparing the results after DMEK and UT-DSAEK are so far lacking. Whether the transplantation of these very thin DSAEK grafts also results in endothelial cell densities and graft rejection rates comparable to DMEK has to be proven.

Outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty in pseudophakic corneal oedema: with or without Descemet's membrane stripping

AIMS

To evaluate and compare outcomes of Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) with non-DSEK (nDSEK) in pseudophakic corneal oedema (PCE).

METHODS

The study was a prospective, non-consecutive, comparative, interventional case series. Twenty-six patients with PCE were randomised into two groups. Group 1 comprised of those cases that had undergone conventional DSEK, and group 2 consisted of those that had nDSEK for PCE between 2010 and 2012. The data on demographics and clinical characteristics were collected from all patients. Any intraoperative and early and late postoperative complications were also noted. The primary outcome measure was postoperative functional success. Graft survival and complications were analysed as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The median best-corrected visual acuities at 6 months postoperatively in groups 1 and 2 were 0.18 (IQR 0.10-0.30) and 0.44 (IQR 0.18-0.51), respectively (p=0.11). Corneal oedema cleared in all patients. During the early postoperative period, a patient in group 2 had lenticule detachment managed by rebubbling.

CONCLUSIONS

nDSEK has outcomes similar to DSEK in PCE with advantages of decreased surgical time and avoidance of inadvertent pull on the posterior stromal fibres that may occur during Descemet's stripping.

Endothelial keratoplasty in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty has superseded penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in adults as the procedure of choice for treating endothelial dysfunction, but endothelial keratoplasty despite the multitude of advantages has undergone a much slower adoption in pediatric patients. This review focuses on the recent advances made in the field of pediatric endothelial keratoplasty and the associated surgical challenges.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pediatric endothelial keratoplasty does not require as many sutures as PKP, and the wound size is smaller and more stable. Endothelial keratoplasty grafts clear faster, possibly allowing for a more effective management of amblyopia. Visual outcomes appear to be comparable with PKP but with a lower complication rate.

SUMMARY

As corneal surgeons grow more and more familiar with the nuances of pediatric endothelial keratoplasty, our understanding of this procedure will become more complete. The limited data available suggest that endothelial keratoplasty is a suitable surgical alternative to PKP in children.

Visual outcome after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in an 8-month-old with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy

Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) has rapidly become the standard of care for endothelial dysfunction of the cornea in adults. There are few reports of DSAEK in children and infants, mainly because most pediatric corneal opacities are full-thickness and therefore not amenable to lamellar procedures but also because of the unique difficulties of performing this procedure in the youngest patients. We report the case of an 8-month-old girl who underwent DSAEK for congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. At 24 months' follow-up, her visual acuity was 20/40 in the operated eye. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an objective visual outcome in a child with DSAEK performed in infancy.