Reproductive Attitudes and Behaviors Among Transgender/Nonbinary Adolescents

Fertility preservation in transfeminine adolescents using TESE at the time of Histrelin Acetate subcutaneous implant placement: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Fertility preservation (FP) is an important aspect of the care of transgender patients in whom Gender Affirming Medical Treatment (GAT) may begin before puberty is completed. While there are overall few studies that can be used to guide conversations about long-term effects of GAT, there are concerns that GAT could negatively impact fertility. Prior studies have shown low utilization of FP in this population, with avoidance of delay in starting GAT cited as one of the most common reasons for foregoing FP. It is possible that strategies to mitigate delay in commencement of GAT can facilitate higher FP utilization, maintaining options for future family building.

OBJECTIVE

To describe our institution's experience with Testicular Sperm Extraction (TESE) for FP and Histrelin Acetate (Supprelin) Subcutaneous Implantation for GAT commencement.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of transfeminine adolescents at our institution from 2010 to 2022 who underwent TESE for FP at the time of Supprelin placement for GAT (FP/SP). Outcomes of interest included successful sperm retrieval, age at first visit to our institution's Transgender Multispecialty Service Health clinic (GeMS), age at time of FP/SP, testicular volume, and Tanner stage at time of FP/SP, and age when GnRH agonist (GnRHa) therapy was prescribed. Testosterone, LH, FSH, and Inhibin B values prior to combination FP/SP were also obtained.

RESULTS

Ten patients from 2017 to 2022 underwent FP/SP after prescription of GnRHa based on Endocrine Society Guidelines. Successful sperm retrieval and storage was achieved in all patients. Median age at FP/SP was fourteen years 5.5 months (range 12y5m-16y8m). Median time from GnRHa prescription to FP/SP was two months (range 2-5 m). Mean testicular volume at time of FP/SP was 13.2 cc (SD 3.38 cc, range 8-17 cc), and median Tanner Stage was IV (range III-V). Average testosterone level was 301.60 (SD 173.04), LH 3.00 (SD 1.25), FSH 3.33 (SD 1.71), Inhibin B 208.50 (SD 87.44).

CONCLUSIONS

Performing TESE for FP is feasible for transgender youth undergoing Histrelin implant placement, leading to short delays in starting GAT. Testicular volume and endocrine markers can provide preoperative insight into likelihood of successful sperm retrieval during TESE, are needed to identify which patients will have successful sperm retrieval to ensure optimal counseling and informed decision making for providers, patients and families.

Reproductive endocrinologist and infertility specialists' knowledge, skills, behaviors, and attitudes regarding the care for transgender and gender-diverse individuals

Objective

To investigate associations between reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) providers' prior training and current knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors regarding fertility preservation and family building for transgender and gender-diverse (T/GD) patients.

Design

The survey was distributed to members of the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, the REI-physician-focused professional body within the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, with additional participants recruited through snowball sampling.

Results

Participants (n = 206) reported on training in T/GD care; 51% endorsed prior training. Most participants (93%) believed T/GD individuals were as fit for parenthood as cisgender individuals. Prior training was associated with an increased likelihood of offering T/GD health resources and more frequent consultations with specialist colleagues.Common barriers to providing care indicated by respondents included cost, delays in gender-affirming care, and lack of knowledge of the potential impact of hormonal interventions. Common facilitators included education and training, prior experience, and affordability of services.

Conclusions

Most REI providers believed T/GD individuals are fit for parenthood and agreed that prior training facilitates care for T/GD patients. The lack of provider knowledge emerged as a barrier to care. Although training helped facilitate some components of care, systemic barriers such as the cost and variability of patient population characteristics/experiences are important considerations when serving T/GD individuals.

Desire for children and fertility preservation in transgender and gender-diverse people: A systematic review

The decision to pursue one's desire for children is a basic human right. For transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people, gender-affirming care may alter the possibilities to fulfill one's desire for children due to the impact of this treatment on their reproductive organs. We systematically included 76 studies of varying quality describing the desire for children and parenthood; fertility counseling and utilization; and fertility preservation options and outcomes in TGD people. The majority of TGD people expressed a desire for children. Fertility preservation utilization rates were low as there are many barriers to pursue fertility preservation. The most utilized fertility preservation strategies include oocyte vitrification and sperm banking through masturbation. Oocyte vitrification showed successful outcomes, even after testosterone cessation. Sperm analyses when banking sperm showed a lower quality compared to cis male samples even prior to gender-affirming hormone treatment and an uncertain recovery of spermatogenesis after discontinuing treatment.

Breaking the Binary: How Clinicians Can Ensure Everyone Receives High Quality Reproductive Health Services

The gender binary has historically defined the study and practice of reproductive and sexual healthcare. However, the male and female binary categorization of sex does not adequately define patients seeking reproductive and sexual health. Comprehensive sexual healthcare should consider diverse gender identity and non-heteronormative sexual practices, family planning, sexually transmitted infections, cancer prevention, and sexual function. Recent research suggests clinicians do not feel prepared to provide care for sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients. In this narrative review, we focus on reproductive and sexual health within the scope of obstetric and gynecologic (OB/GYN) clinical practice. We used traditional medical subject headings to summarize data from publications in peer-reviewed journals published in the last 10 years and identified barriers, facilitators and best practices for de-gendering reproductive healthcare. Following a roughly chronological care path across the lifespan, we categorized findings into the following topics: Early Care for SGM, Sexual Health, Family Planning, and Care Later in Life for SGM. We include recommendations for creating a welcoming environment, SGM inclusive training for clinicians and staff, and best practices for individualized counseling. We review suggested practices related to service delivery and clinical considerations in the provision of sexual and reproductive health care for gender and sexual minority patients.

Retrospective Review of Sexual and Reproductive Health Conversations During Initial Visits of Adolescents Seeking Gender-Affirming Testosterone

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To use a retrospective review of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) counseling that occurred during initial visits of adolescents seeking testosterone gender-affirming hormone therapy to determine the feasibility of using such visits to manage SRH DESIGN: Retrospective chart review SETTING: Children's hospital, multidisciplinary gender clinic PARTICIPANTS: Transgender male and nonbinary patients assigned female at birth (TGD-M) aged 15-17 seen for initiation of testosterone between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019 INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Counseling on (1) testosterone impact on fertility and (2) fertility preservation; assessment of (3) desire for gender-affirming surgery, (4) sexual activity, (5) sexual orientation, and (6) human papilloma virus vaccination as documented during the initial visit.

RESULTS

Of 195 patients who met the inclusion criteria, only 3 (1.5%) had all 6 measures addressed. The median number addressed was 4 out of 6 (IQR = 2-5/6), with fertility counseling (95.9%, n = 187) being most common, followed by assessment of surgery desire (74.4%, n = 145), sexual orientation (69.2%, n = 135), and sexual activity (69.2%, n = 135). The odds of being asked about sexual orientation were 5.3 times higher in patients who endorsed sexual activity than in those who did not (P < .001; 95% CI, 9.8-10.3).

CONCLUSION

Providers of adolescent gender-affirming hormone therapy regularly assess and counsel on certain aspects of SRH as part of their initial visits for those seeking testosterone. Our data suggest that these initial visits for patients seeking testosterone represent an opportunity to expand SRH assessment and counseling among TGD-M adolescents.

Menstrual considerations for transgender male and gender diverse adolescents who were assigned female at birth

Menstruation is a female normative process. Physiologically, it indicates that the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis is functioning appropriately, and all the correct female end-organs are intact. Menarche also heralds a girl's arrival into womanhood, which culturally is often celebrated. It is a sign of the possibility of fertility, pregnancy and motherhood. However, menstruation for transgender males, and other gender diverse individuals assigned female at birth, may be anything but celebratory. For these adolescents, menstruation is an indication that one's body is not functioning appropriately and that one does not have the correct organs congruent to their gender identity. Menstruation or the anticipation of menarche for many transgender males is often met with worsening of dysphoria, anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation. Therefore, to meet the physiologic and psychologic needs of transgender males, one needs to be aware of issues that may be present in relation to menstruation and be knowledgeable on how to medically proceed with sensitivity and respect toward one's gender identity. Research on menstruation, both from a physical and psychologic perspective, has been historically based on women and cannot be simply extrapolated to be the same for transgender males. Although there is a paucity of literature on the subject, over the past decade there has begun to be a great interest in the care of transgender individuals. This article focuses on concerns related to menstruation among transgender adolescent males and gender diverse individuals assigned female at birth, including suppression of menses, fertility, contraception, and pregnancy.

Fertility Desire and Motivation Among Individuals with Gender Dysphoria: A Comparative Study

Despite receiving Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy or Gender-Affirming Surgery, which may adversely impact their fertility, people with Gender Dysphoria (GD) may desire to form families. In this study, we aimed to quantitatively display fertility desire from the perspective of these individuals, despite all the legal challenges they face. The single center, cross-sectional comparative study included individuals with GD and cisgender volunteers. A Sociodemographic Data Form, the Fertility Desire Data Form, the Childbearing Motivations Scale and the Fertility Desire Scale were used. Of the 414 participants, 171 were individuals with GD (110 FtM; 61 MtF) and 243 were cisgender volunteers (142 cis-males; 101 cis-females). While 22% of the people with GD stated that they had regrets about not undergoing fertility preservation, 16% stated that they would like this process if it were legal. People with GD, particularly MtF, want to have children more than cisgenders. Moreover, people with MtF exhibited less negative motivations toward becoming parents, despite having reservations regarding the socioeconomic aspect of parenthood. Our findings indicate that fertility desire in people with GD is not less in comparison to cisgender people. Healthcare professionals should not forget to offer fertility preservation options as part of clinical practice before Gender-Affirming Therapy.

Fertility preservation in transgender and non-binary adolescents and young adults

Although 37.5–51% of transgender adults state they would’ve considered freezing gametes before gender-affirming therapy if offered and 24–25.8% of transgender adolescents express interest in having biological children, less than 5% of transgender adolescents have opted for fertility preservation. We sought to assess fertility preservation utilization in our multidisciplinary adolescent gender clinic. We also aimed to identify fertility preservation utilization and interest among non-binary adolescents and young adults. A retrospective review was conducted of patients seen in the Stanford Pediatric & Adolescent Gender Clinic from October 2015 through March 2019 who were >10 years of age at initial visit. All individuals with documented discussion of fertility preservation were offered referral for formal fertility preservation consultation but only 24% of patients accepted. Only 6.8% of individuals subsequently underwent fertility preservation (n = 9). Transfeminine adolescents are more likely to pursue fertility preservation than transmasculine adolescents (p = 0.01). The rate of fertility preservation in non-binary adolescents did not significantly differ from those in transfeminine adolescents (p = 1.00) or transmasculine adolescents (p = 0.31). Although only one non-binary individual underwent fertility preservation, several more expressed interest with 36% accepting referral (n = 4) and 27% being seen in consultation (n = 3). Despite offering fertility preservation with designated members of a gender clinic team, utilization remains low in transgender adolescents. Additionally, non-binary adolescents and their families are interested in fertility preservation and referrals should be offered to these individuals. Further studies and advocacy are required to continue to address fertility needs of transgender adolescents.

Fertility preservation and fertility treatment in transgender adolescents and adults in a Swedish region, 2013-2018

STUDY QUESTION

In a transgender population referred for fertility consultation, which factors influence the decision to cryopreserve oocytes and sperm?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Previous hormonal treatment, gender affirmation surgery and sexual orientation were associated with the decision to undergo fertility preservation and transgender women underwent fertility preservation more frequently than transgender men.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

It is well-known internationally that fertility preservation and fertility treatment are increasingly requested by transgender men and women. Factors affecting their decisions as well as treatment differences between transgender women and transgender men have been reported, but many studies have had low participation rates and small sample sizes.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This retrospective cohort study, conducted during 2013–2018, included 78 transgender women (assigned male at birth and referred for sperm cryopreservation) and 164 transgender men (assigned female at birth referred for oocyte cryopreservation).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

In 2013, the previous requirement for sterilization before completion of a legal gender change was removed in Sweden. All fertile-aged transgender men and transgender women referred to a tertiary care centre for consultation concerning fertility preservation, fertility treatment or hysterectomy were identified from administrative systems. Demographic, medical and treatment data were extracted from electronic medical records and from an ART database. Logistic regression was applied to analyse factors affecting the decision to cryopreserve gametes among transgender men and transgender women.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A majority of transgender men (69.5%) and transgender women (82%), wanted to become parents. Fertility preservation was less frequent in transgender men than in transgender women (26.2% versus 75.6%, respectively). No individuals among those primarily referred for hysterectomy opted for cryopreservation of oocytes. Among transgender men, young age, no previous hormonal treatment and stating homosexual orientation were independent factors associated with the decision to cryopreserve oocytes. Among transgender women, the decision to undergo gender affirmation surgery and stating heterosexual orientation were independent factors associated with a decision to refrain from fertility preservation. Fertility treatments, using IUI or IVF with donor sperm, were mainly performed in partners of transgender men. Ten live births were reported in the group of transgender men and two for transgender women.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The main limitation is the retrospective nature of the study, with missing data for many variables. The short study period and the study population being too young to permit observation of long-term outcomes of fertility preservation and fertility treatments are reasons for caution.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our results confirm that fertility preservation has been requested by transgender people since the change in Swedish legislation in 2013. Information about aspects of fertility early in the transition process is important, since hormonal and surgical treatments may have a large impact on the decision to undergo fertility preservation. It is important to train fertility clinic staff to identify and handle the specific obstacles, as well as address the need for information and support that transgender people may have when planning for fertility preservation, fertility treatment and pregnancy.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This research was supported by a grant from the Swedish state, under the ALF agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils (ALFGBG-720291), and by Hjalmar Svensson’s Research Foundation. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Reproductive health risks and clinician practices with gender diverse adolescents and young adults

BACKGROUND

Reproductive health counseling is essential for adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) AYAs would benefit from tailored counseling given concerns about iatrogenic infertility and sexual dysfunction, and high rates of interpersonal violence, unplanned pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections, yet there are multiple obstacles to providing this care at the patient/family and clinician levels.

OBJECTIVES

This narrative review summarizes the literature on reproductive health considerations for TGD AYAs, current practices, and clinician barriers and facilitators to providing culturally sensitive reproductive care for TGD AYAs. Specific areas of focus include reproductive health goals, risks, and access barriers; clinician knowledge practices and challenges; and strategies for improving counseling practices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, Web of Science, and PsycInfo databases were searched using the following terms: transgender, non-binary, gender expansive, gender non-conforming, reproductive health, sexual health, fertility, family planning/building, contraception, sexual dysfunction; gender-affirming hormones/surgery, clinician, physician or provider knowledge and attitudes; counseling.

RESULTS

Many TGD AYAs desire biological children and improved sexual experiences. TGD AYAs may experience infertility and sexual dysfunction associated with transition; have disproportionate HIV/STI risk; experience high rates of interpersonal/sexual violence and trauma; and encounter barriers to accessing competent medical care. Clinicians lack knowledge about reproductive health needs of TGD AYAs; inconsistently discuss family building options; perceive counseling challenges; and desire more training in this area.

DISCUSSION

Enriched communication training for medical/mental health clinicians is necessary to provide a skilled workforce for TGD AYAs. Web-based reproductive health training with other populations (eg oncology) demonstrates efficacy for improving communication skills and confidence in counseling, CONCLUSION: This review highlights barriers to adequate reproductive care encountered by TGD AYAs, exacerbated in underserved minority youth. Dedicated training for providers, and programs increasing access are important goals for improving care. The need for additional research is also emphasized.

Reproductive potential and fertility preservation in transgender and nonbinary individuals

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To synthesize recent literature to better understand parenting desires and challenges of transgender individuals as well as the impact of gender-affirming care on reproductive potential.

RECENT FINDINGS

Survey studies of transgender and nonbinary individuals demonstrate significant parenting interest, yet uptake in fertility preservation services remains low with potential for decisional regret. Masculinizing hormones have demonstrated variable effects on folliculogenesis and follicle distribution in the human ovary. In the mouse model, testosterone administration has demonstrated an increase in atretic late antral follicles without a reduction in primordial or total antral follicle counts and a preserved ability to respond to gonadotropin stimulation. Case series of transgender individuals undergoing oocyte or embryo cryopreservation are promising with outcomes similar to cisgender controls. Feminizing hormones have shown detrimental effects on sperm parameters at time of cryopreservation and spermatogenesis in orchiectomy samples with uncertainty regarding the reversibility of these changes.

SUMMARY

Current evidence demonstrates variable effects of gender-affirming hormones on ovarian and testicular function with potential for detrimental impact on an individual's reproductive potential. As many individuals initiate gender-affirming care prior to or during their reproductive years it is imperative that they receive thorough fertility preservation counseling and improved access to reproductive care services.

Reproductive desires in transgender and gender diverse adults: A cross-sectional study in Thailand

Objective: To explore the desires and barriers to fertility preservation among transgender women and gender diverse people assigned male at birth in Thailand. Material and methods: This study is a cross-sectional study in clinic-based setting. The data was obtained from a questionnaire. Three hundred and three participants visiting the Gender Care Clinic at Chiang Mai University Hospital and Mplus clinics between April 2019 and December 2019 were included. Of these, 199 were transgender women and 104 were gender diverse people assigned male at birth. Results: The overall parental desire was 30.4% which was similar across the 2 groups (p = 0.897). A genetically related child was preferred in 40.9% of transgender women and 50.5% of gender diverse group (p = 0.115). Factors impacting a parental desire were a good relationship with family (OR 2.905, 95%CI 1.315-6.420, p = 0.008), being in a stable relationship (OR 4.183, 95%CI 1.738-10.069, p < 0.001) and belief in a positive attitude of society toward LGBTQ parenting (OR 2.572, 95%CI 1.207-5.479, p = 0.014). Access to fertility preservation services was low. The majority of transgender women (75.3%) and gender diverse people (95.2%) never received a consultation regarding fertility. The utilization rate of fertility treatments was 5.3% in our study. Conclusion: Transgender women and gender diverse people assigned male at birth have parental desires for a genetically related child. However, access to reproductive information, consultation and services were very limited. Social support along with competent health services might increase access to reproductive services in transgender and gender diverse populations.

Maternal Health in the Transgender Population

Social acceptance and legal protections for transgender and gender nonconforming patients have increased over the past decade, but significant health care disparities still remain. Such an area of disparity is discussion with and interventions for fertility, contraception, pregnancy, and lactation in TGNC patients. Providing optimal care starts with creating a welcoming and safe environment. Appropriate preconception education includes the effects of gender-affirming therapies (both surgical and nonsurgical) on fertility as well the fertility preservation techniques that are available. However, as gamete retrieval requires natal hormone stimulation, gender dysphoria may be worsened. Thus, these patients should be carefully monitored not only medically, but also with regard to their mental health. In addition to assisted reproductive technologies, protocols exist to aid with induction of lactation as well as discontinuation if desired. As this is a growing field of medicine with limited data available on safety and long-term outcomes, recommendations are for a multidisciplinary team approach to ensure patients' safety and well-being.