Progestogen Hypersensitivity: Heterogeneous Manifestations with a Common Trigger

Progesterone Hypersensitivity in Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Implications for Safety and Efficacy

The global rise in the age of childbirth, influenced by changing sociodemographic patterns, has had a notable impact on fertility rates. Simultaneously, assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) have become increasingly prevalent due to advancements in reproductive medicine. The paper explores the intersection between the surge in ARTs and the rising number of iatrogenic autoimmune progesterone dermatitis (APD). Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis, commonly known as progesterone hypersensitivity, manifests itself as a mucocutaneous hypersensitivity syndrome. It is characterized by a wide range of dermatological symptoms, with urticaria and maculopapular rashes being the most prominent signs. Concurrently, systemic symptoms, such as fever, angioedema, and, in severe instances, anaphylaxis, may ensue. This dermatologic condition poses a significant challenge to women of childbearing age. This intricate syndrome frequently manifests itself in conjunction with menstruation or pregnancy as a reaction to physiological fluctuations in endogenous progesterone. However, given that exposure to exogenous progesterone is an integral component of various modern therapies, secondary APD has also been described. Our findings unveil a heightened likelihood of developing secondary progesterone hypersensitivity in ART patients that is attributed to the administration of exogenous progesterone through intramuscular, intravaginal, and oral routes. The study also explores available therapeutic interventions for facilitating viable pregnancies in individuals grappling with autoimmune progesterone dermatitis within the context of ARTs. This comprehensive analysis contributes valuable insights into the intricate relationship between reproductive technologies, dermatological challenges, and successful pregnancy outcomes.

Progesterone hypersensitivity: a cyclical history

Hypersensitivity reaction to progesterone is rare, with less than 200 cases reported. It occurs mainly in women in their third decade of life and can have a heterogeneous presentation (cutaneous and/or systemic), with temporal relation to serum levels of progesterone. Diagnosis is based on history and physical examination, supported by skin tests. We describe the case of a woman in her late 20s with pruritic erythema on the chest that manifested in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, with spontaneous resolution in less than 5 days, without secondary scarring. The histological diagnosis was non-specific, with evidence of interface dermatitis, but positive skin tests supported the diagnosis of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis. It is intended to alert to the manifestations of a pathology that is rare and difficult to diagnose but with a great impact on daily life.

Effect of Gender and Special Considerations for Women in Mastocytosis and Anaphylaxis

This article reviews the effects of gender on anaphylaxis in general and focuses on mastocytosis-specific issues. Incidence of anaphylaxis is increased in female compared with male patients during the pubertal years through the fifth decade of life, in which these disparities decrease. Estrogen is thought to increase the severity of anaphylaxis through increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase release. Despite this, all-cause fatal anaphylaxis does not appear to show a gender predilection. Systemic mastocytosis incidence is higher in women; however, mortality is increased in men owing to increased molecular and cytogenetic abnormalities.

Progesterone Hypersensitivity Induced by Exogenous Progesterone Exposure

Progesterone hypersensitivity (PH) is a rare hypersensitivity reaction to either endogenous or exogenous progesterone. There are around 200 reported cases of progesterone hypersensitivity in the medical literature. We present the case of a 31-year-old female who presented with cyclical urticaria and angioedema after exogenous progesterone exposure. Her symptoms would begin a few days before her menstrual cycle began and resolve after menstruation. She only had partial recovery of her symptoms with antihistamines, steroids, montelukast, and omalizumab. She needed treatment with oral contraceptives and had a resolution of symptoms, but subsequently developed a recurrence again. Given the rarity of this condition, the diagnosis is often delayed. This diagnosis should be considered for women of reproductive age who present with cyclic hypersensitivity or allergic symptoms.

A focused report on progestogen hypersensitivity

INTRODUCTION

Progestogen Hypersensitivity (PH) is caused by increased sensitivity to either exogenous or endogenous progestogens. It is characterized by recurrent cutaneous eruptions including erythema multiforme, eczema, urticaria, and angioedema, which may be associated with systemic symptoms including asthma and anaphylaxis.

AREAS COVERED

Symptoms may be persistent or cyclical, coinciding with progestogen levels. With increased use of oral contraceptives and hormonal treatments for fertility, the prevalence of PH is expected to continuously increase. Several proposed immunological mechanisms, diagnostics, and treatment modalities have been proposed. Most treatments focus on suppressing ovulation and progesterone secretion or inducing tolerance through progesterone desensitization.

EXPERT OPINION

Although there has been increased recognition both clinically and in the medical literature, there is still a general lack of knowledge of PH and its clinical features in the medical community. An improved understanding of the underlying pathophysiology as well as more available commercial testis, such as ELISA that accurately measures specific IgE to progesterone, are expected to broaden and improve opportunities for disease recognition and symptom control. It is essential for physicians across specialties to recognize how to diagnose PH and either manage this condition or refer these patients to a specialist with experience treating PH.

Whole course of treatment of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis that had spontaneously resolved during pregnancy: A case report and review of the literature

Anaphylaxis due to autoimmune progesterone dermatitis is a rare but severe allergic disease in women. The clinical manifestations of APD are diverse, and a proper understanding of the disease can help even diagnose and treat it. A case of autoimmune progesterone dermatitis related in our department is reported as follows. She developed a rash with severe pruritus that was highly consistent with her menstrual cycle without any trigger 10 years ago. Laboratory tests were unremarkable. But all the symptoms disappeared during her pregnancy and resurfaced after the miscarriage. Two years ago, after a positive progesterone intradermal test confirmed the diagnosis of PH, she was given mifepristone, contraceptives(OCPs), and skin embedding treatment, and her symptoms improved.

Unraveling the Role of Sex Hormones on Keratinocyte Functions in Human Inflammatory Skin Diseases

The skin exerts several fundamental functions that are the first physical, chemical and immune barriers to the human body. Keratinocytes, the main cell type of the epidermis, provide mechanical defense, support skin integrity and actively endorse cutaneous immune responses. Not surprisingly, considering these crucial activities, alterations in keratinocyte functions are associated with different inflammatory skin diseases. Recent findings indicate that the skin should not only be regarded as a target for hormones but that it should also be considered as an endocrine peripheral organ that is directly involved in the synthesis and metabolism of these chemical messengers. Sex hormones have multiple effects on the skin, attributed to the binding with intracellular receptors expressed by different skin cell populations, including keratinocytes, that activate downstream signaling routes that modulate specific cellular functions and activities. This review is aimed at reorganizing the current knowledge on the role exerted by sex hormones on keratinocyte function in five different inflammatory skin diseases: Hidradenitis suppurativa; Acne vulgaris; Atopic dermatitis; progesterone hypersensitivity; psoriasis. The results of our work aim to provide a deeper insight into common cellular mechanisms and molecular effectors that might constitute putative targets to address for the development of specific therapeutic interventions.

Adult skin acute stress responses to short-term environmental and internal aggression from exposome factors

Exposome factors that lead to stressed skin can be defined as any disturbance to homeostasis from environmental (meteorological factors, solar radiation, pollution or tobacco smoke) and/or internal exposure (unhealthy diet, hormonal variations, lack of sleep, psychosocial stress). The clinical and biological impact of chronic exposome effects on skin functions has been extensively reviewed, whereas there is a paucity of information on the impact of short‐term acute exposure. Acute stress, which would typically last minutes to hours (and generally no more than a week), provokes a transient but robust neuroendocrine‐immune and tissue remodelling response in the skin and can alter the skin barrier. Firstly, we provide an overview of the biological effects of various acute stressors on six key skin functions, namely the skin physical barrier, pigmentation, defences (antioxidant, immune cell‐mediated, microbial and microbiome maintenance), structure (extracellular matrix and appendages), neuroendocrine and thermoregulation functions. Secondly, we describe the biological and clinical effects on adult skin from individual exposome factors that elicit an acute stress response and their consequences in skin health maintenance. Clinical manifestations of acutely stressed skin may include dry skin that might accentuate fine lines, oily skin, sensitive skin, pruritus, erythema, pale skin, sweating, oedema and flares of inflammatory skin conditions such as acne, rosacea, atopic dermatitis, pigmentation disorders and skin superinfection such as viral reactivation. Acute stresses can also induce scalp sensitivity, telogen effluvium and worsen alopecia.

Hormonal Effects on Urticaria and Angioedema Conditions

Women appear to be more frequently affected with urticaria and angioedema. Sex hormones are believed to have an important mechanistic role in regulating pathways involved in these conditions. This effect is likely nonspecific for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) or many forms of angioedema (AE), because many other chronic diseases such as asthma are also affected by sex hormones. The role of sex hormones has been better elucidated for hereditary AE, because they have been shown to have multiple effects including upregulation of FXII, an important activator of the kallikrein pathway. However, their role in the underlying pathogenesis for CSU is less clear. Autoimmunity is clearly linked to CSU, which is more common in women. This suggests that sex hormones could act as adjuvants in activating or upregulating autoimmune pathways. The purpose of this review is to discuss in detail the role of sex hormones in CSU and AE and how a better understanding of the impact hormones has on these conditions might lead to new treatment advancements with better clinical outcomes.

Gender differences in anaphylaxis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Is sexual dimorphism also true in anaphylaxis as described in other allergic diseases? Possible gender differences in the epidemiology, triggers, severity, outcomes of anaphylaxis as well as in the pathogenesis of the disease are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hormonal status and the X-chromosome-coded factors deeply involved in the regulation of T-cell and B-cell responses may influence the gender difference noticed in allergic diseases, such as asthma and rhinitis. Little is known if sex is also relevant for anaphylaxis, although the description of catamenial anaphylaxis is intriguing. However, epidemiologic bias, lack of reliable animal models for the human disease, differences into diagnostic codes and not harmonized clinical grading unfortunately represent hurdles to obtain meaningful information on this topic.

SUMMARY

The female sex predisposes to a dysregulation of the immune response as suggested by the increased prevalence of autoimmunity and atopy. In anaphylaxis, pathomechanisms are not fully disclosed, triggers are numerous and IgE-dependent mast cell degranulation only represents a part of the story. Improvement into the definition of the disease including a more careful coding system and better investigations about triggers seem the only way to allow a more precise assessment of the possible different risk for women to develop anaphylaxis.

Progestogen Sensitization: a Unique Female Presentation of Anaphylaxis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Progestogen hypersensitivity (PH) is a condition which typically occurs in women in childbearing years with a spectrum of symptoms ranging from urticaria with or without angioedema, dermatitis to systemic anaphylaxis. Herein, a clinical case of PH is presented followed by a discussion on the evaluation, diagnosis, and management of PH.

RECENT FINDINGS

Progestogen hypersensitivity (a.k.a. "autoimmune progesterone dermatitis") symptoms are associated with exogenous progestin exposure (e.g., contraceptive medicines, in vitro fertilization therapy) or endogenous progesterone from progesterone surges during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. This condition can be difficult to recognize due to its heterogeneous clinical presentation. The mechanism of PH is believed to be primarily IgE-mediated; however, less commonly other immune responses may be involved. There is now a useful progesterone specific IgE immunoassay to assist in diagnosis and well-defined treatment algorithms that can be used to successfully manage PH. The epidemiology of PH is still poorly elucidated but is likely to be encountered by clinicians and especially allergists given the extensive use of oral contraceptives and increased use of supra-physiologic doses of progesterone required to support pregnancy in IVF. Including PH in the differential diagnosis of women presenting with cyclic hypersensitivity will accelerate diagnosis and successful management of this condition.

Phellinus linteus Grown on Germinated Brown Rice Inhibits IgE-Mediated Allergic Activity through the Suppression of FcεRI-Dependent Signaling Pathway In Vitro and In Vivo

Phellinus linteus (PL) has been used as a traditional herbal medicine owing to its immune regulatory activity. Previous studies reported that PL grown on germinated brown rice (PBR) exerted immunomodulatory, anticancer, and anti-inflammatory activities. However, role of PBR on type I hypersensitive reactions has not been studied yet. We found that PBR contained more polyphenolic compounds than PL extract. Among fractions, PBR butanol fraction (PBR-BuOH) significantly contained the most amounts of total polyphenolic contents compared with all extracts or fractions. In this study, anti-allergic activity of PBR-BuOH was examined using in vitro and in vivo models of immunoglobulin E/antigen- (IgE/Ag-) stimulated allergy. The inhibitory activity of degranulation was higher in PBR-BuOH (IC₅₀ 41.31 ± 0.14 μg/mL) than in PL-BuOH (IC₅₀ 108.07 ± 8.98 μg/mL). We observed that PBR-BuOH suppressed calcium influx and the level of TNF-α and IL-4 mRNA expression in a dose-dependent manner. The phosphorylation of Fyn, Gab2, PI3K, Syk, and IκB protein is reduced by PBR-BuOH. Oral administration of PBR-BuOH inhibited allergic reactions including the extravasation of Evans blue dye, ear swelling, and infiltration of immune cells in mice with passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA). These findings suggest that PBR-BuOH might be used as a functional food, a health supplement, or a drug for preventing type I hypersensitive allergic disease.

Development of a progesterone-specific IgE assay for diagnosing patients with suspected progestogen hypersensitivity

BACKGROUND

Progesterone hypersensitivity (PH) manifests as a spectrum of allergic symptoms during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Confirming progesterone-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE; sIgE) by skin testing is unreliable because of irritant responses.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a progesterone sIgE assay to assist in diagnosing PH.

METHODS

A progesterone-bovine serum albumin (BSA) conjugate was characterized and used to analyze sera collected from women in our center with suspected PH in a 1-batch enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to establish high, low and negative cut-points. Sera collected from healthy nonatopic female subjects and from women with classical PH symptoms were included as negative and positive controls, respectively. Values exceeding the average negative control (OD + 3× the standard deviation) were considered positive. These cut-points were subsequently used to establish positive and negative results for serum from women with suspected PH received from other centers. A subset of high positive sera was used for ELISA-inhibition and in a beta-hexosaminidase mediator release assay to evaluate the specificity and functional relevance of progesterone-specific serum IgE, respectively. The numbers of true negative, false negative, true positive, and false positive samples were determined.

RESULTS

The direct progesterone sIgE ELISA results ranged from high positive to low positive and negative compared with healthy nonatopic control sera. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay inhibition and beta-hexosaminidase mediator release confirmed specificity and functional relevance of progesterone-sIgE, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity positive predictive values and negative predictive values were found to be 82%, 100%, 86%, and 100%, respectively, using the mediator release assay results as the gold standard.

CONCLUSION

This assay has a good specificity and positive predictive value for screening women with suspected PH for progesterone sIgE.

Presentation and natural history of progestogen hypersensitivity

OBJECTIVE

To review the published medical literature on the clinical presentation, risk factors, and natural history of hypersensitivity reactions to progestogens.

DATA SOURCES

Through the use of PubMed, we conducted a review of allergy, dermatology, and obstetric literature for cases and case series of patients with hypersensitivity reactions to exogenous or endogenous progestogens. There are no longitudinal, prospective studies related to progestogen hypersensitivity.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Publications were selected that described cases that were clinically consistent with progesterone hypersensitivity and positive test results or clear symptoms with exposure to progestogens to confirm the diagnosis.

RESULTS

Progestogen hypersensitivity symptoms can be triggered by endogenous progesterone or exogenous progestins used for contraception or fertility treatments. Symptoms are varied and include dermatitis, urticaria, asthma, and anaphylaxis.

CONCLUSION

Although the medical literature on progestogen hypersensitivity is limited to case reports and small case series, significant heterogeneity exists in clinical presentation among patients.

The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice 2017 Year in Review

An impressive number of clinically impactful studies and reviews were published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice in 2017. As a service to our readers, the editors provide this Year in Review article to highlight and contextualize the advances published over the past year. We include information from articles on asthma, allergic rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, immunotherapy, atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, food allergy, anaphylaxis, drug hypersensitivity, urticarial/angioedema, eosinophilic disorders, and immunodeficiency. Within each topic, epidemiologic findings are presented, relevant aspects of prevention are described, and diagnostic and therapeutic advances are enumerated. Treatments discussed include behavioral therapy, allergen avoidance therapy, positive and negative effects of pharmacologic therapy, and various forms of immunologic and desensitization management. We hope this review will help readers consolidate and use this extensive and practical knowledge for the benefit of patients.

Progestogen Hypersensitivity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Progestogen hypersensitivity (PH) is a rare disorder which usually occurs in women of childbearing age with symptoms ranging from urticaria with or without angioedema, multiple organ involvement consistent with allergic anaphylaxis, to a spectrum of other non-evanescent skin eruptions. In this review, we present a clinical vignette of PH and discuss the clinical presentation and proposed pathomechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of PH.

RECENT FINDINGS

The hypersensitivity symptoms are associated with exogenous progestin exposure (e.g., contraceptive medicines, in vitro fertilization therapy) or endogenous progesterone from progesterone surges during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. Recognition of this condition can be challenging to the clinician due to its heterogeneous clinical presentation. It has been recently proposed to use the new term "progestogen hypersensitivity" to replace "autoimmune progesterone dermatitis" due to the lack of evidence supporting an autoimmune mechanism for this disorder. In addition, diagnostic and treatment algorithms are now available that can lead to successful management of this condition. More new developments of Progesterone desensitization protocols are now available which appear to be the safest and most effective long-term treatment option for PH. With the extensive use of oral contraceptives and increased use of supra-physiologic doses of progesterone to support pregnancy in in vitro fertilization, there is likely to be a higher prevalence of PH in the future than currently recognized. Therefore, the allergist-immunologist will be required to collaborate with gynecologists and reproductive endocrinologists to diagnose and treat this condition.