1
|
Volcheck GW, Melchiors BB, Farooque S, Gonzalez-Estrada A, Mertes PM, Savic L, Tacquard C, Garvey LH. Perioperative Hypersensitivity Evaluation and Management: A Practical Approach. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:382-392. [PMID: 36436761 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Perioperative hypersensitivity (POH) is an uncommon, potentially life-threatening event. Identification of POH can be difficult given the lack of familiarity, physiological effects of anesthesia, draping of the patient during surgery, and potential nonimmunological factors contributing to signs and symptoms. Given the unique nature and large number of medications administered in the perioperative setting, evaluation of POH can be challenging. In this paper, we present a practical approach to management with an emphasis on understanding what happens in the operating room, the overlap of signs and symptoms between nonimmunological and immunological reactions, acute management, and subsequent evaluation. In addition, we provide a strategy for further review of an initially negative evaluation and emphasize the importance of establishing management plans for the patient as well as providing recommendations to the medical, anesthesia, and surgical teams for future surgeries. A critical factor for successful management at all points in the process is a close collaboration between the anesthesia and the allergy teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerald W Volcheck
- Division of Allergic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
| | | | - Sophie Farooque
- Frankland Allergy Clinic, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada
- Division of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Paul Michel Mertes
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Louise Savic
- Department of Anaesthesia, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Charles Tacquard
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lene Heise Garvey
- Allergy Clinic, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Knapp C, Bhatia K. Maternal collapse in pregnancy. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2022; 83:1-12. [PMID: 36594762 DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2022.0259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Maternal collapse is a rare life-threatening event that can occur at any stage of pregnancy or up to 6 weeks postpartum. Prompt identification and timely intervention by a multidisciplinary team that includes an obstetrician, midwifery staff and an obstetric anaesthetist are essential to improve maternal and fetal outcomes. Standard adult resuscitation guidelines need to be followed with some modifications, taking into account the maternal-fetal physiology, which clinicians should be familiar with. During cardiac arrest, the emphasis is on advanced airway management, manual uterine displacement to relieve aortocaval compression and performing a resuscitative hysterotomy (peri-mortem caesarean delivery) swiftly in patients who are more than 20 weeks gestation to improve maternal survival. Annual multidisciplinary simulation training is recommended for all professionals involved in maternity care; this can improve teamwork, communication and emergency preparedness during maternal collapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Knapp
- North West School of Anaesthesia, Health Education England North West, Manchester, UK
| | - K Bhatia
- Department of Anaesthesia, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Munasinghe BM, Perera RN, Kumara SKWR. Two lives at stake: Obstetric anaphylactic shock resulting in acute respiratory distress syndrome – A case report. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2022; 10:2050313X221084843. [PMID: 35320983 PMCID: PMC8935580 DOI: 10.1177/2050313x221084843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Maternal anaphylaxis is rare albeit life-threatening critical incident dreaded by many due to negative effects on not only the mother but the foetus as well. Antibiotics and anaesthetic agents still contribute to majority of the episodes. Consequences of anaphylaxis such as placental insufficiency and subsequent foetal neurocognitive deficits are devastating outcomes. Acute respiratory distress syndrome following anaphylaxis is even rarer among the normal population. The management of maternal anaphylaxis does not differ from routine recommendations even though close monitoring and preparedness for early delivery should be embedded in the protocols. This is a rare case report of a primi mother who developed anaphylactic shock following intravenous penicillin in the background of negative allergic history, resultant foetal distress requiring emergency lower segment caesarian section and delayed onset acute respiratory distress syndrome which was later attributed to anaphylaxis. Pertinent identification and management which included a multidisciplinary team culminated in favourable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - RN Perera
- District General Hospital Mannar, Mannar, Sri Lanka
| | - SKWR Kumara
- District General Hospital Mannar, Mannar, Sri Lanka
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
State-of-the-Art on Biomarkers for Anaphylaxis in Obstetrics. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:life11090870. [PMID: 34575019 PMCID: PMC8467046 DOI: 10.3390/life11090870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is an unpredictable systemic hypersensitivity reaction and constitutes a high risk of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality when occurring during pregnancy. Currently, the acute management of anaphylaxis is based on clinical parameters. A total serum tryptase is only used to support an accurate diagnosis. There is a need to detect other biomarkers to further assess high-risk patients in obstetrics. Our objective is to present biomarkers in this complex interdisciplinary approach beyond obstetrician and anaesthetic management. Candidate biomarkers derive either from mediators involved in immunopathogenesis or upcoming molecules from systems biology and proteomics. Serum tryptase is determined by singleplex immunoassay method and is important in the evaluation of anaphylactic mast cell degranulation but also in the assessment of other risk factors for anaphylaxis such as systemic mastocytosis. Another category of biomarkers investigates the IgE-mediated sensitization to triggers potentially involved in the etiology of anaphylaxis in pregnant women, using singleplex or multiplex immunoassays. These in vitro tests with natural extracts from foods, venoms, latex or drugs, as well as with molecular allergen components, are useful because in vivo allergy tests cannot be performed on pregnant women in such a major medical emergency due to their additional potential risk of anaphylaxis.
Collapse
|
5
|
Carra S, Schatz M, Mertes PM, Torres MJ, Fuchs F, Senna G, Castells MC, Demoly P, Tanno LK. ANAPHYLAXIS AND PREGNANCY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND CALL FOR PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIONS. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:4270-4278. [PMID: 34365055 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.07.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although rare, anaphylaxis during pregnancy implies a risk to both mothers and newborns. OBJECTIVE This systematic review is intended to identify key issues in the diagnosis and management of this condition in order to support prevention strategies and decrease the risk of death related to anaphylaxis during pregnancy. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, Lilacs, Scielo and Science Direct databases for manuscripts concerning terms "anaphylaxis during pregnancy" without language restrictions. We screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias independently in duplicate. RESULTS We selected 12 articles. Frequency of anaphylaxis during pregnancy is estimated between 1.5 to 3.8 per 100 000 maternities. Only one study provided anaphylaxis mortality data in pregnant women, and the rate of anaphylaxis-related maternal mortality is estimated at 0.05 per 100 000 live births. No standard definition of anaphylaxis severity has been utilized. Forty-nine percent to 74% of anaphylaxis cases were described during caesarean sections. Beta-lactam antibiotics (58%), latex (25%) and anaesthetic agents (17%) were the main culprits. In 17% of papers, causative agents were proven by allergy testing. Seventy two percent of articles proposed the same management and treatment for a clinical episode of anaphylaxis during pregnancy as in non-pregnant patients, and, use of epinephrine in the patient's care during anaphylaxis in pregnancy. CONCLUSION Few studies address anaphylaxis during pregnancy, and the majority have been produced by non-allergy specialists. Collaboration between different specialists involved in the care of pregnant women should be established in order to support preventive strategies and reduce avoidable deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Carra
- Department of Allergy, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Michael Schatz
- Department of Allergy, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Paul-Michel Mertes
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Strasbourg University Hospital, EA 3072, FMTS Strasbourg, France 1 Place de l'Hôpital - BP 426 67091 STRASBOURG CEDEX
| | - Maria Jose Torres
- Allergy Unit and Research Group, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, UMA-IBIMA-BIONAND, ARADyAL, Málaga, Spain
| | - Florence Fuchs
- Departement of gynecology and obstetric, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Desbrest d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IDESP UMR UA11 INSERM, University of Montpellier, France; Inserm, CESP Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations, U1018, Reproduction et Développement de l'enfant, 94807 Villejuif, France
| | - Gianenrico Senna
- Asthma Center and Allergy Unit, Verona University and General Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Mariana C Castells
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston (M.C.C.); and the Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville (E.J.P.), USA
| | - Pascal Demoly
- Department of Allergy, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Desbrest d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IDESP UMR UA11 INSERM, University of Montpellier, France; WHO Collaborating Centre on Scientific Classification Support, Montpellier, France
| | - Luciana Kase Tanno
- Department of Allergy, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Desbrest d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IDESP UMR UA11 INSERM, University of Montpellier, France; WHO Collaborating Centre on Scientific Classification Support, Montpellier, France; Hospital Sírio-Libanês.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
D'Astous-Gauthier K, Graham F, Paradis L, Des Roches A, Bégin P. Beta-2 Agonists May be Superior to Epinephrine to Relieve Severe Anaphylactic Uterine Contractions. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 9:1232-1241. [PMID: 33181341 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.10.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine contractions are recognized as a potential manifestation of anaphylaxis, but literature on their proper management is limited. It is widely recognized that anaphylactic reactions can cause uterine contractions, but little is known about their optimal management. OBJECTIVE Review potential treatments for painful uterine contractions associated with anaphylaxis or mast cell activation. METHODS This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched in English, French, and Spanish for reports of uterine anaphylaxis published up until July 2020. The search strategy used a combination of Boolean operators and included the following Medical Subject Heading terms and keywords: hypersensitivity; anaphylaxis; mastocytosis; uterus; uterine contraction; pelvic pain; labor, obstetric; labor, premature; and endometriosis. RESULTS This systematic review identified 19 studies reporting on 31 cases of painful uterine contractions occurring during anaphylaxis or other events associated with mast cell activation. Nine patients were pregnant. We present 2 additional cases in nonpregnant women, one associated with an oral food challenge and the other associated with oral food desensitization. The most frequent triggers were subcutaneous immunotherapy (14 cases), food (6 cases), and drugs (4 cases). Uterine cramps were associated with systemic symptoms in 24 cases and lasted on average for 2.4 hours. Pretreatment with antihistamines and montelukast generally failed to prevent recurrence, but nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were used successfully in some reports. Response to intramuscular epinephrine was inconsistent. Data from ex vivo models indicate that epinephrine may paradoxically contribute to uterine contractions through alpha-receptor activity. A small number of cases showed good response to beta-2 agonists. CONCLUSIONS There is a lack of quality data on painful uterine contractions occurring in the context of anaphylactic reactions and on their optimal management. In the absence of counterindication, use of a beta-2 agonist and premedication with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs could be the preferred options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine D'Astous-Gauthier
- Division of Allergy, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Francois Graham
- Division of Allergy, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Division of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ste-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Louis Paradis
- Division of Allergy, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Division of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ste-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Anne Des Roches
- Division of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ste-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Philippe Bégin
- Division of Allergy, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Division of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ste-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Biazar G, Farzi F, Chaibakhsh Y, Habibi MR, Khosousi Sani M, Mirmansouri L. Successful Management of a Suspected Case of Meperidine-Induced Anaphylaxis in Cesarean Delivery. Anesth Pain Med 2020; 10:e104796. [PMID: 34150563 PMCID: PMC8207837 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.104796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Meperidine is known as the gold standard drug for shivering after spinal anesthesia (SA). This drug has been used widely and safely during the Cesarean Section (CS). Case Presentation This case report presents an anaphylaxis reaction to a single intravenous dose of 25 mg meperidine, aiming to control shivering during CS under SA a few minutes after surgical incision. Conclusions The condition was well managed with timely intervention. This rare fetal reaction to meperidine is worthy of reporting to make the medical team aware of the potential risks of anaphylaxis due to many routine safe drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gelareh Biazar
- Anesthesiology Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Alzahra Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Farnoush Farzi
- Anesthesiology Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Alzahra Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
- Corresponding Author: Department of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Alzahra Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box: 4144654839, Rasht, Iran.
| | - Yasmin Chaibakhsh
- Anesthesiology Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Alzahra Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Habibi
- Anesthesiology Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Alzahra Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Mahsa Khosousi Sani
- Reproductive Health Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Al-Zahra Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Ladan Mirmansouri
- Student Research Committee, School of Pharmacy, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McCall SJ, Bonnet MP, Äyräs O, Vandenberghe G, Gissler M, Zhang WH, Van Leeuw V, Deneux-Tharaux C, Kurinczuk JJ, Knight M. Anaphylaxis in pregnancy: a population-based multinational European study. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:1469-1475. [PMID: 32463487 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Anaphylaxis in pregnancy is a rare but severe complication for both mother and infant. Population-based data on anaphylaxis in pregnancy are lacking from mainland European countries. This multinational study presents the incidence, causative agents, management and maternal and infant outcomes of anaphylaxis in pregnancy. This descriptive multinational study used a combination of retrospective (Finnish medical registries) and prospective population-based studies (UK, France, Belgium and the Netherlands) to identify cases of anaphylaxis. Sixty-five cases were identified among 4,446,120 maternities (1.5 per 100,000 maternities; 95%CI 1.1-1.9). The incidence did not vary between countries. Approximately three-quarters of reactions occurred at the time of delivery. The most common causes were antibiotics in 27 women (43%), and anaesthetic agents in 11 women (17%; including neuromuscular blocking drugs, 7), which varied between countries. Anaphylaxis had very poor outcomes for one in seven mothers and one in seven babies; the maternal case fatality rate was 3.2% (95%CI 0.4-11.0) and the neonatal encephalopathy rate was 14.3% (95%CI 4.8-30.3). Across Europe, anaphylaxis related to pregnancy is rare despite having a multitude of causative agents and different antibiotic prophylaxis protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J McCall
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.,Center for Research on Population and Health, American University of Beirut, Lebanon
| | - M-P Bonnet
- Université de Paris, CRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team EPOPé, INSERM U1153, Paris, France.,Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpital Armand Trousseau, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, France.,Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation Research Network, Paris, France
| | - O Äyräs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - G Vandenberghe
- Department of Obstetrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Gissler
- Information Services Department, THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - W-H Zhang
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Research Laboratory for Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - V Van Leeuw
- Perinatal Epidemiology Center (CEpiP), Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Deneux-Tharaux
- Université de Paris, CRESS, Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team EPOPé, INSERM U1153, Paris, France
| | - J J Kurinczuk
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - M Knight
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schatz M, Sicherer SH, Khan DA, Zeiger RS. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice 2019 Highlights. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 8:912-936. [PMID: 31980411 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
This article provides highlights of the clinically impactful original studies and reviews published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice in 2019 on the subjects of anaphylaxis, asthma, dermatitis, drug allergy, food allergy, immunodeficiency, immunotherapy, rhinitis/sinusitis, and urticaria/angioedema/mast cell disorders. Within each topic, practical aspects of diagnosis and management are emphasized. Treatments discussed include lifestyle modifications, allergen avoidance therapy, positive and negative effects of pharmacologic therapy, and various forms of immunologic and desensitization management. We designed this review to help readers consolidate and use this extensive and practical knowledge for the benefit of their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schatz
- Department of Allergy, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego, Calif.
| | - Scott H Sicherer
- Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - David A Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy & Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Robert S Zeiger
- Department of Allergy, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego, Calif; Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, Calif
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Takahashi M, Hotta K, Inoue S, Takazawa T, Horiuchi T, Igarashi T, Takeuchi M. Mepivacaine-induced anaphylactic shock in a pregnant woman undergoing combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a case report. JA Clin Rep 2019; 5:84. [PMID: 32026066 PMCID: PMC6967107 DOI: 10.1186/s40981-019-0302-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anaphylactic shock during pregnancy is a rare but life-threatening event for both the mother and the newborn. Case presentation A 42-year-old woman, who was pregnant with twins, was scheduled for cesarean delivery under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. An epidural catheter was placed uneventfully. After spinal anesthesia, the patient exhibited skin symptoms and severe hypotension. The patient was diagnosed with anaphylaxis, and subsequently, treatment was started. Fetal heart rate monitoring revealed sustained bradycardia, and it was decided to proceed with cesarean delivery. After delivery, the mother’s vital signs recovered. Both infants were intubated due to birth asphyxia. Currently, the twins are 4 years old and exhibit no developmental problems. Clinical examination identified mepivacaine as the causative agent of anaphylaxis. Conclusions This case report highlights that upon occurrence of anaphylaxis during pregnancy, maternal treatment and fetal assessment should be started immediately. Indication for immediate cesarean delivery should be considered and a definite identification of the causative factor pursued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miyuki Takahashi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
| | - Kunihisa Hotta
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Soichiro Inoue
- Department of Anesthesiology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae-ku, Kawasak-shii, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Tomonori Takazawa
- Intensive Care Unit, Gunma University Hospital, 3-39-15 Showa-machi, Maebashi-shi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Tatsuo Horiuchi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi-shi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Takashi Igarashi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| | - Mamoru Takeuchi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke-shi, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Global Trends in Anaphylaxis Epidemiology and Clinical Implications. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2019; 8:1169-1176. [PMID: 31786255 PMCID: PMC7152797 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Revised: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The true global scale of anaphylaxis remains elusive, because many episodes occur in the community without presentation to health care facilities, and most regions have not yet developed reliable systems with which to monitor severe allergic events. The most robust data sets currently available are based largely on hospital admissions, which are limited by inherent issues of misdiagnosis, misclassification, and generalizability. Despite this, there is convincing evidence of a global increase in rates of all-cause anaphylaxis, driven largely by medication- and food-related anaphylaxis. There is no evidence of parallel increases in global all-cause anaphylaxis mortality, with surprisingly similar estimates for case-fatality rates at approximately 0.5% to 1% of fatal outcomes for hospitalizations due to anaphylaxis across several regions. Studying regional patterns of anaphylaxis to certain triggers have provided valuable insights into susceptibility and sensitizing events: for example, the link between the mAb cetuximab and allergy to mammalian meat. Likewise, data from published fatality registers can identify potentially modifiable risk factors that can be used to inform clinical practice, such as prevention of delayed epinephrine administration, correct posturing during anaphylaxis, special attention to populations at risk (such as the elderly on multiple medications), and use of venom immunotherapy in individuals at risk of insect-related anaphylaxis.
Collapse
|